Download PDF
Review  |  Open Access  |  30 Jul 2026

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries

Views: 6 |  Downloads: 0 |  Cited:  0
Energy Mater. 2026, 6, 600088.
10.20517/energymater.2026.115 |  © The Author(s) 2026.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Abstract

Metal-carbon dioxide (M-CO2) batteries are a promising dual-function technology for addressing the urgent need for high-energy-density storage and the imperative of carbon capture and utilization. Among them, hybrid Na-CO2 batteries belonging to the alkali metal-CO2 family offer unique advantages of resource abundance, enhanced safety, and reaction pathways toward valuable chemicals through a proton-coupled electron transfer mechanism. Among battery components, the catholyte and its nature influence ion transport, establish the micro-reaction environment at the catalyst interface, and directly determine the discharge product speciation and overall cell performance. However, despite growing interest in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, review reports thoroughly examining design principles of catholytes, along with their challenges and advances, are still lacking. In this paper, we systematically review the latest progress in catholyte development for hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, covering aqueous electrolytes, water-in-salt electrolytes, gel electrolytes, molten-salt electrolytes, and solid-state electrolytes. We critically analyze the fundamental electrochemical reaction mechanisms, discharge product characteristics, and the corresponding advantages and limitations for each system. Key challenges, such as the narrow electrochemical stability window (ESW), interface compatibility issues, sluggish CO2 reduction kinetics, and the trade-off between product selectivity and long-term stability, are highlighted. Finally, future research perspectives and directions, emphasizing in-depth mechanistic understanding through advanced operando characterization, rational design of electrolyte-catalyst interfaces, and the development of multifunctional electrolyte systems, are proposed to achieve efficient, durable, and economically viable hybrid Na-CO2 batteries for practical carbon-neutral energy applications.

Keywords

Hybrid Na-CO2 battery, CO2 electrochemistry, working mechanism, catholyte engineering, electrochemical performance

INTRODUCTION

The Industrial Revolution and excessive consumption of fossil fuels resulted in increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations reaching over 425 ppm as of 2024, which, in turn, induced a global warming equivalent to a 1.5 °C rise in global temperature[1,2]. These compounding pressures of climate change induce extreme weather, ocean acidification, and ecosystem imbalance, posing serious challenges to the sustainable development of human society[3]. Under these conditions, traditional carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) technologies, considered a key pathway, have failed due to their high energy consumption and operating costs, especially when considering the continuous rise in carbon emissions, thereby limiting their large-scale application[4,5]. Alternatively, metal-carbon dioxide (M-CO2) batteries, deeply integrating energy storage and CO2 utilization, are innovative systems with unique dual advantages of converting CO2 as a cathode active material into high-value chemicals, such as carbonates, formates, or carbon monoxide, allowing the realization of in-situ resource utilization of greenhouse gases while producing energy with a theoretical energy density of up to 1,880 Wh kg-1, a value significantly better than that of traditional lithium-ion batteries (LIBs, ~250 Wh kg-1)[6-8]. Among M-CO2 batteries, alkali metal (Li, Na, and K)-carbon dioxide batteries exhibit unique electrochemical advantages in terms of low electrochemical potentials of its anode metals [-3.04 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) for Li, -2.71 V vs. SHE for Na, and -2.93 V vs. SHE for K], as well as excellent theoretical energy densities induced by the multi-electron reduction reaction of the CO2 cathode[6,9]. Furthermore, the low free energy generated by the interaction between alkali metals and CO2 endows the battery with a lower charging potential, helping to suppress electrolyte decomposition, improve round-trip efficiency, and extend battery life[10,11]. Among the alkali M-CO2 battery family, Na-CO2 batteries are synergistically advantageous in terms of resource sustainability and high electrochemical performance. In fact, the resource abundance of sodium with a crustal content of 2.36 wt% is about 3 orders higher than that of lithium (0.0017 wt%), with an even global distribution preventing geopolitical risks and supply chain vulnerabilities from the available sources[12,13]. Na-CO2 batteries also operate on a reversible reaction pathway, resulting in a relatively low operating voltage that suppresses electrolyte decomposition and improves cycle efficiency for better electrochemical properties[14]. The Na+ phase, with a small Stokes radius (1.02 Å) and a first ionization energy (495.8 kJ mol-1), also improves the ion transport dynamics of Na+ over a wide temperature range, endowing the batteries with excellent low-temperature electrochemical performance[15,16].

A typical Na-CO2 battery can be configured from a Na anode and a highly porous cathode to facilitate CO2 gas diffusion and electrochemical reactions. The two electrodes are separated by a polymeric or ceramic membrane and are immersed in an electrolyte[17-19]. Na-CO2 battery systems are generally categorized into two main types depending on the nature of the electrolyte. The first has to do with nonaqueous Na-CO2 batteries (defined as aprotic and solid-state Na-CO2 batteries), and the second deals with hybrid aprotic/aqueous (referred to as ‘‘hybrid’’) Na-CO2 batteries[20-22]. In nonaqueous electrolyte systems, discharge products of Na-CO2 batteries, such as Na2CO3, are typically insoluble and electrochemically inert[20]. They can also deposit inside the pores of the gas diffusion electrode, gradually covering the active sites and blocking the CO2 transport channels, passivating the electrode and degrading battery performance[23,24]. This bottleneck can be overcome by constructing hybrid Na-CO2 batteries with the configuration of “Na|aprotic electrolyte|Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (NASICON) solid electrolyte|aqueous electrolyte|CO2 electrode”[25], in which the unique dual-chamber structure provides the hybrid Na-CO2 battery with several significant advantages. The first is highly efficient reaction kinetics, in which the high solubility of CO2 in aqueous electrolytes enhances CO2 mass transfer, thereby greatly increasing the positive electrode reaction rate. The second is excellent cycle stability, in which discharge products, such as formate or carbonate, may dissolve in the aqueous electrolyte to effectively prevent their accumulation as solid products in the cathode pores, thereby avoiding electrode passivation and enhancing the long-term activity of the reaction interface and extended battery life. The third advantage has to do with the intrinsic safety, where the NASICON solid electrolyte acts as a physical barrier to completely isolate the aqueous electrolyte and cathode active material from the metallic sodium anode, fundamentally eliminating the side reactions between the active material and the Na anode for significantly improved chemical compatibility and battery safety performance. Last but not least, the fourth advantage relies on product controllability, where the reduction pathway of CO2 in aqueous solution can be selectively converted by controlling the catalyst and reaction conditions to generate high-value-added chemicals, such as formic acid, carbon monoxide, and methanol, according to the proton-coupled electron transfer mechanism[21,26]. Together, these advantages have made the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries very promising for integration into energy storage-carbon sequestration technologies, moving forward from proof of concept to practical application.

So far, significant progress has been made in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, as an emerging electrochemical energy storage and carbon fixation technology. For instance, a rechargeable hybrid Na-CO2 battery with an aqueous cathode electrolyte was reported in 2018 for the first time and was found to continuously generate electrical energy during discharge while producing hydrogen instead of CO2 during charging[21]. Further optimization of the battery structure, along with the development of novel cathodes, efficient catalysts, electrolytes, and discharge products, resulted in gradually improved electrochemical performances of the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, as depicted in Figure 1A. Among hybrid Na-CO2 battery components, the catholyte plays a crucial role in connecting the solid electrolyte and the catalyst layer, along with providing a proper micro-reaction environment for CO2 reduction on the catalyst layer, thereby directly affecting the electrochemical performance of the whole battery[27-29]. In practice, catholytes not only require basic characteristics, such as high ionic conductivity, good thermal stability, superior chemical/electrochemical stability, environmental friendliness, and low cost, but should also possess easily tunable solvation structures to regulate the interfacial micro-reaction environment[9,30-33]. However, unfortunately, only a handful of review papers have so far reported the progress on hybrid Na-CO2 battery catholytes, often as a subsection in general M-CO2 battery reviews[29].

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 1. (A) Progress of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries with various catholytes, (A1) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[21]. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier. (A2) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[25]. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier. (A3) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[30]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier. (A4) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[31]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier. (A5) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[32]. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier. (A6) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[33]. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier. (A7) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[34]. Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society. (A8) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[28]. Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons. (A9) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[35]. Copyright © 2025 Elsevier. (A10) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[36]. Copyright © 2026 John Wiley & Sons; (B) Schematic illustration of the catholyte in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12; SEI: solid electrolyte interface.

Herein, a thorough investigation of the influence of catholyte on the reaction mechanism and electrochemical performance of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries is performed by focusing on the latest research progress of catholytes [Figure 1B]. A detailed discussion of the electrochemical reaction mechanism of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries is provided, along with an in-depth analysis of discharge products. The challenges and future development trends of hybrid Na-CO2 battery cathode electrolytes are also summarized. We believe that this article contributes to providing an in-depth understanding of hybrid Na-CO2 battery systems and can be used as a reference for future research and development of hybrid Na-CO2 battery systems.

OVERVIEW OF HYBRID NA-CO2 BATTERY

Mechanism of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries

Despite the relatively early development of non-aqueous Na-CO2 batteries, the separator’s inferior physicochemical properties and inability to effectively prevent the crossover of active species have led to severe anode corrosion and dendrite growth [Figure 2A]. These issues significantly compromise both the electrochemical performance and safety of non-aqueous Na-CO2 batteries, and can be addressed by constructing hybrid Na-CO2 battery alternatives. Such systems typically comprise a sodium metal anode in contact with an organic anolyte, a NASICON solid electrolyte separator, and a catalytically active porous cathode in contact with an aqueous catholyte, as depicted in Figure 2B. The NASICON solid electrolyte allows the diffusion of only Na+ between the cathode and anode electrodes, while effectively blocking the diffusion of active materials to the anode to prevent corrosion of metallic sodium. During discharge, metallic sodium oxidizes to Na+ by losing one electron, which is then driven by the voltage difference to migrate toward the cathode through the organic electrolyte and solid electrolyte[28]. At the cathode, CO2 gains electrons at the reaction interface and reduces to different forms of carbon-containing discharge products (solid products, liquid products, and gaseous products) depending on the different micro-reaction environments composed of the electrolyte and the catalyst. During the charging process, the solid and liquid products decompose, releasing Na+ and CO2[8,10]. When gaseous products are generated, the charging process is the oxygen reduction step of water oxidation in the electrolyte. Thus, the catholyte not only acts as a transport medium for Na+ but also determines the electrochemical reaction pathway and may even directly participate in the whole electrochemical reaction of the battery. Therefore, proper electrolytes with stable electrochemical properties and high conductivity may yield better results, thereby being the focus of current research and development.

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 2. (A) Non-aqueous Na-CO2 battery structure, (B) hybrid Na-CO2 battery structure. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12.

Electrolytes and catalyst interface micro-reaction environment chemistry

The core advantage of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries resides in the catholyte, which not only serves as an ion-transport medium but also actively participates in regulating interfacial reaction chemistry. Through synergistic interaction with the catalyst, a micro-reaction environment can be precisely constructed at the solid/liquid/gas three-phase interface to control the pathway and final products of the electrochemical CO2 reduction.

The electrolyte dictates the chemical potential and the kinetics of proton supply at the interface. For aqueous electrolytes, water serves not only as a solvent but as a crucial proton source directly participating in CO2 reduction. The proton-coupled electron transfer mechanism allows CO2 reduction to overcome the constraints of simple electron transfer, thereby surmounting various energy barriers to generate various chemical products ranging from formic acid (HCOOH) and CO to multi-carbon products (such as C2H4 and C2H5OH)[34]. However, an excessive proton supply may not necessarily be advantageous, rendering the precise regulation of proton activity and concentration vital for successful reactions. For example, the relatively low H/O atomic ratio at the electrolyte/catalyst interface in sodium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (NaFSI)-based electrolytes may create a highly favorable chemical environment for CO2 adsorption and subsequent hydrogenation steps[28]. This environment stabilizes key intermediates, such as *HCOOH or HCOO*, ultimately leading to the highly selective production of HCOOH.

Electrolytes can also directly regulate the stability and evolutionary pathways of reaction intermediates through their unique bulk and interfacial structures. For instance, organic cations, such as those derived from imidazolium-based ionic liquids in gel electrolytes, can interact with both the electrode surface and reaction intermediates via strong coordination or π-π stacking, effectively stabilizing the key intermediate C2O42- and inhibiting its disproportionation into the thermodynamically stable CO32-[32]. In this fashion, the discharge products might be directed towards the highly reversible Na2C2O4, rather than the insulating and difficult-to-decompose Na2CO3. Hence, highly reactive intermediates can be “captured” and stabilized by the intrinsic molecular properties of the electrolyte components, enabling the rational manipulation of reaction pathways. The interfacial contact configuration between the electrode and the solid electrolyte also plays a crucial role in the electrode reactivity. Optimizing the traditional “point-to-point” contact into a more efficient “face-to-face” configuration not only reduces interfacial charge-transfer impedance but also establishes a more continuous and stable three-phase reaction channel for the transport of Na+ and CO2[35].

Finally, the physicochemical properties of electrolytes, particularly their CO2 solubility and ionic transport characteristics, establish the fundamental kinetic framework for interfacial reactions, in which highly concentrated electrolytes significantly restrict the free water content. This not only broadens the electrochemical stability window (ESW) but also suppresses side reactions, such as the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), facilitating the electrochemical CO2 reduction across a wider potential range[30]. For instance, the low donor number (DN) and high polarity of the solvent in acetonitrile (MeCN)-based gel electrolytes, coupled with the low solvation-desolvation energy barrier for Na+, synergistically facilitate CO2 enrichment and accelerate reaction kinetics at the electrode interface[33]. In high-temperature molten-salt systems, the exceptionally high ionic conductivity and the unique molten ionic environment significantly enhance interfacial charge transfer and accelerate the oxidative decomposition kinetics of discharge products, such as Na2CO3[36]. As a consequence, tailoring the physical state of the electrolyte can effectively decouple and optimize the crucial processes of ionic transport and interfacial reactions.

Product analysis of hybrid Na-CO2 battery

The discharge products of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries are closely related to the nature of the catalyst, atmosphere, and electrolyte[37,38]. Depending on the properties of key materials and reactants, the discharge products of the battery may include gaseous, liquid, and solid products. To better understand reaction mechanisms, various experiments and analyses have been performed on different cell configurations. For example, Kim et al.[21] constructed a hybrid Na-CO2 battery using metallic sodium as the anode, CO2 as the cathode, and NaOH solution as the catholyte, with the sodium metal anode kept in the organic electrolyte and separated from the aqueous electrolyte by a NASICON separator.

In this battery, the overall reaction mechanisms included chemical reactions and electrochemical reactions. The chemical reaction of the CO2 dissolution mechanism was as follows:

$$ {CO}_{2}({aq})+{H}_{2} {O}({l}) \rightleftharpoons {H}_{2} {CO}_{3}({aq}) \ \ \ K \mathrm{h}=1.70 \times 10^{-3} $$

$$ {H}_{2} {CO}_{3}({aq}) \rightleftharpoons {HCO}_{3}^{-}({aq})+{H}^{+}({aq}) \ \ \ {pK}_{a 1}=6.3 $$

As shown in Figure 3A, the gas chromatography (GC) analysis of the generated gases during discharge confirmed H2 as the only gaseous product. The corresponding electrochemical reaction that took place in the battery can be summarized as follows:

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 3. Gas chromatography (GC) profiles of gases evolved during the (A) discharge and (B) charge processes. (A and B) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[21]. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier; Characterization of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery electrode during discharge and recharge: (C) in-situ Raman spectra and (D) ex-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. (C and D) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[25]. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier; (E) In-situ Raman spectra of quasi-solid-state Na-CO2 batteries. (E) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[32]. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier; (F) Ion chromatography (IC) analysis of the catholyte after discharge, (G) discharge/charge profiles, and (H) quasi-in-situ 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) characterization of the catholyte at different discharge/charge stages. (F-H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[28]. Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons. PTFE: Polytetrafluoroethylene.

$$ \mathrm{Anodic}: 2 N a-2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 N a^{+} \ \ \ E^{0}=2.71 \ V $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : 2 H^{+}+2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons H_{2}(g)\ \ \ E^{0}=0.00 \ V $$

$$ \mathrm{Overall}\ \mathrm {reaction}: 2 {Na}+2 {H}^{+} \rightleftharpoons 2 {Na}^{+}+{H}_{2}({g}) \ \ \ E^{0}=2.71 \ {V} $$

During the charging process, the qualitative GC analysis detected the evolution of oxygen, as evidenced by Figure 3B, with the corresponding electrochemical reactions that can be written as follows:

$$ 2 {H}_{2} {O} \rightleftharpoons {O}_{2}({g})+4 {H}^{+}+4 e^{-}\ \ \ E^{0}=1.229 \ V $$

Xu et al.[25] further investigated the discharge reaction mechanism of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery using in-situ Raman spectroscopy [Figure 3C] and ex-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) [Figure 3D]. Their study aimed to confirm Na2CO3 and C as discharge products of the Na-CO2 battery based on a saturated NaCl aqueous solution as a catholyte. The relevant reactions can be summarized as follows:

$$ \mathrm{Anodic} : 4 N a-4 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 4 N a^{+} $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : 4 {Na}^{+}+3 {CO}_{2}+4 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 {Na}_{2} {CO}_{3}+{C} $$

$$ \mathrm{Overall \ reaction}: 4 {Na}+3 {CO}_{2} \rightleftharpoons 2{Na}_{2} {CO}_{3}+C \ \ \ E^{0}=2.35 \ V $$

$$ {Na}_{2} {CO}_{3}+{CO}_{2}+{H}_{2} {O} \rightleftharpoons 2 {NaHCO}_{3} $$

Using in-situ Raman spectroscopy, Xu et al.[32] confirmed Na2C2O4 as the discharge product of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery based on gel electrolyte, as displayed in Figure 3E. In gel electrolyte, Na2C2O4 surrounded by imidazole-like organic cations significantly reduced the charge on its surface, preventing the disproportionation reaction of C2O42- to CO32- to ensure Na2C2O4 as the final discharge product, as follows[32]:

$$ \mathrm{Anodic} : 2{Na}-2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 {Na}^{+} $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : 2 {Na}^{+}+2 {CO}_{2}+2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {Na}_{2} {C}_{2} {O}_{4} $$

$$ \mathrm{Overall \ reaction} : 2 {Na}+2 {CO}_{2} \rightleftharpoons {Na}_{2}{C}_{2} {O}_{4} $$

In our previous study[28], we employed a water-in-salt electrolyte as a catholyte to enable the successful generation of HCOOH in the hybrid Na-CO2 battery. The ion chromatography (IC) analysis of the electrolyte after discharge revealed the formation of substantial amounts of HCOO- in the electrolyte, as evidenced by Figure 3F. The quasi-in-situ 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) characterization during the discharge/charge process confirmed the production of large quantities of HCOOH during discharge, which gradually disappeared during the charging process, corroborating HCOOH as a discharge product of the battery [Figure 3G and H]. The corresponding battery reactions can be summarized as follows:

$$ \mathrm{Anodic} : 2 {Na}-2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 {Na}^{+} $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : {CO}_{2}+2 {H}^{+}+2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {HCOOH} $$

$$ \mathrm{Overall \ reaction} : 2 {Na}+{CO}_{2}+2 {H}^{+} \rightleftharpoons {HCOOH}+2 {Na}^{+} $$

Using different combinations of aqueous electrolytes and catalysts, Kim et al. successfully generated chemical substances, such as CO, HCOOH, and C2 in a hybrid Na-CO2 battery[34], with relevant reactions during discharge that can be summarized as follows:

$$ \mathrm{ Anodic}: 2 {Na}-2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 {Na}^{+} $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : {CO}_{2}+2 {H}^{+}+2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {CO}+{H}_{2} {O} $$

$$ {CO}_{2}+2 {H}^{+}+2 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {HCOOH} $$

$$ 2 {CO}_{2}+12{H}^{+}+12 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {C}_{2} {H}_{4}+4 {H}_{2}{O} $$

$$ 2 {CO}_{2}+12 {H}^{+}+12 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {C}_{2} {H}_{5} {OH}+3 {H}_{2} {O} $$

During the charging process, the electrochemical reaction can be written as follows:

$$ \mathrm{Anodic} : {Na}^{+}+e^{-} \rightleftharpoons {Na} $$

$$ \mathrm{Cathodic} : 4 O H^{-}-4 e^{-} \rightleftharpoons 2 {H}_{2} {O}+{O}_{2}({g}) $$

In aqueous electrolytes, the continuous supply of protons (H) allows effective control over the battery reaction pathway to generate diverse discharge products, providing a foundation for the functional design of batteries and the resource utilization of CO2.

HYBRID NA-CO2 BATTERY ELECTROLYTES

Traditional aqueous electrolytes

The use of aqueous electrolytes in Na-CO2 batteries is advantageous in terms of intrinsic safety, excellent ion transport performance, environmental friendliness, and the unique CO2 reduction mechanism[39,40]. Water solvent is non-flammable and thermally stable, preventing fundamental safety hazards of flammability and explosion related to the use of organic electrolytes. The low viscosity and high dielectric constant of water also endow aqueous electrolytes with higher ionic conductivity when compared to organic systems, enabling rapid charging and discharging of the battery at low-temperatures. Using water as a solvent also avoids the strict assembly environment associated with organic solvents, significantly reducing material costs and environmental impact for better economic efficiency and sustainability. More importantly, the application of water solvent in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries not only acts as an ion transport medium but also serves as a direct source of protons, enabling the occurrence of a proton-coupled electron transfer mechanism, suitable for a more flexible and controllable CO2 reduction process, as well as directional generation of various value-added chemicals, such as formate and C2H4. The formation of soluble products in water solvent also effectively prevents the deposition and passivation of solid products on the electrode surface, benefiting the cycle stability and energy efficiency of the battery. The combined effect of these advantages of using water as a solvent enables hybrid Na-CO2 batteries to achieve synergistic energy storage and CO2 resource utilization under mild conditions, demonstrating unique technological value and application prospects of aqueous solvents in hybrid Na-CO2 battery assemblies.

As presented in Figure 4A, Kim et al.[21] constructed a hybrid Na-CO2 battery with metallic sodium as the anode in contact with an organic electrolyte as the anolyte, and a noble metal as the cathode catalyst (Pt/C + IrO2) in contact with an aqueous NaOH solution as the catholyte, with the organic electrolyte and aqueous electrolyte separated by a NASICON membrane. In this configuration, CO2 spontaneously dissolved in the aqueous electrolyte, resulting in electrolyte acidification. During discharge, the battery underwent a HER to generate H2 gas and deliver electrical energy. Since the cathode reaction potential was significantly affected by the pH of the aqueous solution, the spontaneous dissolution of CO2 helped improve the kinetic performance of HER due to the decrease in pH, as shown in Figure 4B. The H2 generated during the discharge process naturally escaped from the electrode surface, forcing the occurrence of an oxygen evolution reaction (OER) from water oxidation during the charging process without CO2 generation [Figure 4C]. The resulting system exhibited a stable charge-discharge platform and a stable cycle life of 700 h, fully demonstrating its good rechargeability, as confirmed by Figure 4D.

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 4. (A) Schematic illustration of the hybrid Na-CO2 system and its reaction mechanism, (B) cyclic voltammetry (CV) profiles, (C) anodic rotating disk electrode profile, and (D) cycle performance of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery. (A-D) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[21]. Copyright © 2018 Elsevier; (E) Flow cell type hybrid Na-CO2 battery and its discharge product, (F) FEformate, FECO, and FEH2 at different current densities, (G) discharge polarization curves and power density curves, (H) FE of discharge products at different current densities. (E-H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[34]. Copyright © 2023 American Chemical Society; (I) Schematic illustration of the proposed hybrid Na-CO2 battery, (J) photograph of a practical hybrid Na-CO2 battery, hybrid Na-CO2 battery performance: (K) discharge-charge voltage curves with different catholytes, and (L) cycling performance. (I-L) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[25]. Copyright © 2019 Elsevier. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12.

Kim et al.[34] explored different combinations of catalysts and electrolytes in similar battery structures, overcoming the limitations of traditional hybrid Na-CO2 batteries in terms of C2 product generation and power density, as illustrated by Figure 4E. When applied to an H-cell type hybrid Na-CO2 battery composed of a 0.5 M NaHCO3 catholyte and Ni-N-C catalyst with an average particle diameter of 1 μm, products based on formic acid, CO, and H2 were generated simultaneously during discharge, as shown in Figure 4F. The highest amount of HCOOH [70.4% Faradaic efficiency (FE)] was obtained at a current density of 15.0 mA cm-2, followed by FEH2 at 13.9% and FECO at 13.7%[34]. Furthermore, the battery showed stable cyclability for more than 24 h at a current density of 5 mA cm-2. In a flow cell-type hybrid Na-CO2 battery configuration, the use of a Ni-N-C catalyst in combination with a 1 M NaOH electrolyte delivered a battery power density reaching 25.0 mW cm-2 at a current density of 29.7 mA cm-2, as revealed by Figure 4G. In this flow cell-type hybrid Na-CO2 battery, using cubic Cu2O nanoparticles as the catalyst and a 1 M NaOH aqueous solution as the catholyte resulted in a variety of discharge products, such as H2, CO, formate, ethylene, and ethanol, as shown in Figure 4H. Under 25 mA cm-2, the highest FE was recorded with C2 compounds, consisting of 37.6% (ethanol: 18.1% and ethylene: 19.5%). In addition, this work also constructed an anode-free hybrid Na-CO2 battery using Ni-N-C nanoparticles as cathode catalyst in contact with seawater as the catholyte. During the discharge process, CO and H2 were recorded as the positive electrode discharge products. Under a current density of 20.0 mA cm-2, FECO reached a highest value of 85%[34]. Mechanistic studies revealed that the OER reaction from water oxidation takes place during the charging reaction, while the discharge products do not directly participate in the electrochemical process, limiting the long lifespan of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery.

Xu et al.[25] designed a reversible hybrid Na-CO2 battery using a saturated NaCl aqueous solution as the catholyte in contact with N-doped single-walled carbon nanohorns (N-SWCNHs) as the catalyst, and a NASICON solid electrolyte as the separator, as shown in Figure 4I and J. The in-situ Raman spectroscopy and ex-situ XRD characterization of the cathode catalyst layer during the discharge process revealed the reduction of CO2 to C and Na2CO3, while the generated Na2CO3 further reacted with water in the electrolyte to form NaHCO3 [Equation 10]. The high solubility of the discharge product Na2CO3 in aqueous solution and the unique catalytic activity of N-SWCNHs greatly improved the battery round-trip efficiency and cycle capability, as shown in Figure 4K and L. Further improvement of the electrochemical performance of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery can be achieved by using saturated NaCl aqueous solution as the catholyte in combination with proper design and optimization of catalysts[41].

Together, the above results show great progress in the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries based on aqueous electrolytes, yet several significant challenges remain to be solved during battery operation. First, aqueous electrolytes in an open cathode structure experience poor thermal stability. As reported by Xu et al.[25], failing to replenish the electrolyte in time would greatly affect the cycle performance of the battery. This can be solved to some extent by adopting a flow cell-type battery structure to limit electrolyte evaporation, but this may inevitably reduce the weight energy density of the battery. In addition, the narrow ESW of aqueous electrolytes (approximately 1.23 V) makes them prone to decomposition during battery operation, thereby affecting the battery’s electrochemical performance. These features can be effectively addressed by designing more stable aqueous electrolytes to improve battery performance.

Water-in-salt electrolytes

Unlike aqueous electrolytes, water-in-salt electrolytes use water as a solvent and high-concentration salt as a solute, with the volume and weight of the solute salt significantly exceeding that of the solvent water[42,43]. Compared to traditional low-concentration aqueous electrolytes, the high salt concentration strongly influences ion interactions in the system, with the solvation shell of metal ions mainly composed of contact ion pairs[44]. Such a unique solvation structure enables contact between ion pairs containing specific anions to construct a stable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer in-situ on the cathode surface, significantly widening the ESW of the electrolyte[45,46]. This also allows matching high-voltage cathode with low-voltage anode materials, effectively improving the energy density of the resulting batteries. Moreover, water-in-salt electrolytes exhibit excellent thermal stability in addition to inheriting the advantages of aqueous electrolytes, such as high safety and environmental friendliness. More importantly, the water-in-salt electrolytes tend to form a glassy state rather than a crystalline state at low-temperatures, suitable for maintaining continuous ion transport channels and ensuring stable battery operation under low-temperature conditions[47,48]. Overall, water-in-salt electrolytes possess high safety, good ionic conductivity, elevated chemical compatibility, relevant thermal stability, and controllable solvation structure, providing an important foundation for the design and optimization of high-performance batteries. In fact, water-in-salt electrolyte systems have been widely used in various energy storage devices, such as metal-ion batteries[49,50], metal-gas batteries[51,52], and supercapacitors[53,54]. In metal-gas batteries with open cathode structures, their high chemical and thermal stability provides key support for improving electrochemical performance[55,56]. These attributes of water-in-salt electrolytes as the catholytes might also apply to hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, deserving further research and development in this direction.

The first constructed hybrid Na-CO2 battery based on the water-in-salt electrolyte was reported by Im et al.[30]. As shown in Figure 5A, a 17 m NaClO4 solution was used as the catholyte, and increasing the catholyte concentration effectively suppressed HER in the electrolyte, as shown by linear scanning voltammetry (LSV) and corresponding differential electrochemical mass spectrometry (DEMS) measurements. The rise in the electrolyte concentration from 1 m to 17 m also significantly broadened the ESW to 3.45 V and enhanced stability, as illustrated in Figure 5B. Benefiting from the excellent physicochemical properties of the electrolyte, the constructed hybrid Na-CO2 battery exhibited excellent cycle stability, with a stable cycle time of over 1,200 h, as can be observed in Figure 5C. However, the high insulation and thermodynamic stability of the discharge product Na2CO3 still limited the battery in terms of the large overpotential (1.65 V) and the low round-trip efficiency (56.58%)[30]. Additionally, a relatively low concentration of the water-in-salt electrolyte (17 m) formed an ionic structure in which each cation interacted with ~3 water molecules, resulting in relatively poor inhibition of water-molecule activity and leading to electrolyte decomposition during battery operation, affecting the battery’s electrochemical performance.

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 5. (A) Schematic representation of a hybrid Na-CO2 battery with water-in-salt electrolyte, (B) ESW of different aqueous electrolytes (1, 10, and 17 m), and (C) cycle performance of the battery. (A-C) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[30]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier; (D) ESW of different water-in-salt electrolytes, (E) schematic diagram of hybrid Na-CO2 battery with NaFSI-based electrolytes, (F) free energy profiles for CO2 reduction to HCOOH in vacuum, 18 m NaClO4, 35 m NaFSI, and Na(FSI)27(ClO4)8. Electrochemical performance of hybrid Na-CO2 battery: (G) discharge specific capacity curves, and (H) cycling curves of the battery at different temperatures. (D-H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[28]. Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12; ESW: electrochemical stability window.

As displayed in Figure 5D, we previously developed a dual-salt water-in-salt electrolyte featuring a wide ESW, and systematically evaluated its application as the catholyte of a hybrid Na-CO2 battery[28]. Our results revealed a successful transition of the discharge product from solid Na2CO3 to liquid HCOOH using this electrolyte [Figure 5E]. The obtained hybrid Na-CO2 battery exhibited a low H/O atomic ratio at the catalyst/electrolyte interface, beneficial for forming a liquid product, HCOOH. Furthermore, the free energy calculations of CO2 capture and its conversion to HCOOH in different water-in-salt electrolytes suggested a much lower generation of HCOOH in NaFSI-based water-in-salt electrolyte than in 17 m NaClO4 electrolyte, as displayed in Figure 5F. IC and NMR characterization identified the discharge product of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery using NaFSI-based water-in-salt electrolyte as liquid HCOOH. The high reversibility of HCOOH and the excellent thermal/chemical stability of the NaFSI-based water-in-salt electrolyte endowed the hybrid Na-CO2 battery with high electrochemical performance. In Figure 5G, the hybrid Na-CO2 battery based on a NaFSI-based water-in-salt electrolyte illustrated an ultra-high areal capacity of 148.1 mAh cm-2, a value far exceeding those of alkali metal-CO2 batteries at the time. The battery based on a NaFSI-based water-in-salt electrolyte also exhibited excellent cycle stability, especially in terms of low-temperature cycle stability [Figure 5H], with stable cycling for over 2,500 h at -20 °C, achieving the best low-temperature M-CO2 cycle life.

The use of water-in-salt electrolytes not only endows hybrid Na-CO2 batteries with excellent electrochemical performance at room temperature but also shows great potential for application in low-temperature environments. Additionally, water-in-salt electrolytes can expand the application of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries to a wide temperature range and promote their development toward extreme operating conditions. However, water-in-salt electrolytes still suffer from several drawbacks. In fact, high concentration represents high costs, elevated viscosity, and low Na+ conductivity, restricting their practical large-scale application and further improvement of their electrochemical performance. Therefore, more research focus should be paid to optimizing electrolyte composition, improving transport performance, and promoting the practical application while taking into account both cost and efficiency.

Gel electrolytes

Gel electrolytes consist of confining a liquid electrolyte within a polymer or inorganic network. The use of this kind of electrolyte in battery systems is advantageous in terms of retaining the high ionic conductivity of liquids (typically reaching the order of 10-3 S cm-1, higher than that of solid electrolytes) while endowing the system with leak-free properties, high safety, and excellent mechanical flexibility[57-59]. Furthermore, gel electrolytes can effectively buffer changes in electrode volume and suppress dendrite growth, thereby combining the interfacial wettability of liquid batteries with the morphological stability of solid batteries. When applied to cathodes of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, gel electrolytes exhibit even more unique functions. First, the gel electrolyte induces a stable “solid-liquid-gas” three-phase reaction interface, ensuring not only the effective diffusion of CO2 gas to the cathode catalyst layer, but also preventing the loss of liquid electrolyte due to gas scouring or airflow disturbance, thereby solving the drying problem of traditional liquid systems under gas flow conditions[60,61]. Second, the moderate mechanical constraint in gel electrolytes can regulate the deposition morphology and spatial distribution of discharge products (such as Na2CO3), preventing dense accumulations of insulating products on the positive electrode surface and preventing premature termination of the reaction for significantly improved battery capacity and cycle stability[62,63]. Moreover, the high viscoelasticity of the gel electrolyte can tightly adhere to the cathode catalyst layer and maintain good interfacial contact during cycling, crucial for hybrid Na-CO2 batteries requiring to withstand large volume changes[64,65].

Xu et al.[32] prepared a catholyte based on a gel electrolyte for a hybrid Na-CO2 battery by dispersing 10 g of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and 330 g of sodium(I)bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (NaTFSI) in 1.5 mL of the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide {[C2C1im][NTf2]} via ultrasonication for 1 h. The resulting dispersion was then centrifuged to obtain the gel, as displayed in Figure 6A. Compared with the original CNTs, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging of the obtained gel electrolyte revealed the entangled CNT bundles forming a three-dimensional (3D) network due to the interaction between the organic cations of the imidazole ion groups and the π electrons of CNTs during the gelation process, suitable for improving the mechanical strength of the material, as shown in Figure 6B. The gel electrolyte also illustrated high conductivity due to the presence of CNTs (102-103 S cm-1), which served as electron conduction channels in the gel electrolytes. In Figure 6C, the use of the gel electrolyte as catholyte in hybrid Na-CO2 battery configurations stabilized the discharge product Na2C2O4 by interacting with the organic cations in the gel electrolyte, thereby inhibiting its further conversion into Na2CO3. Also, the high reversibility of Na2C2O4 as a discharge product endowed the hybrid Na-CO2 battery with excellent cycle stability, achieving stable cycling for 367 cycles at a current density of 0.1 mA cm-2, with a total cycle time exceeding 2,200 h [Figure 6D].

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 6. (A) Scheme of gel electrolyte synthesis process, (B) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of gel electrolytes, (C) electrochemical reaction mechanism of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery with gel electrolytes, and (D) cycling performance of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery. (A-D) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[32]. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier; Plots of (E) specific capacities, (F) power densities, and (G) cycling performance of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, and (H) schematic illustration of the proposed Na+ diffusion in different electrolytes. (E-H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[33]. Copyright © 2023 Elsevier. CNT: Carbon nanotube; TEGDME: tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether; NCF: N-doped carbon framework.

The electrochemical performance of gel electrolyte-based hybrid Na-CO2 batteries can be further improved by using MeCN solvent, characterized by a wide ESW, a low viscosity, and high CO2 solubility as the battery catholyte. In this view, Im et al.[33] applied MeCN to the catholyte of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries and recorded improved battery performance, with a discharge specific capacity of approximately 2,200 μAh cm-2 as shown in Figure 6E, a value 2.2-fold that of the conventional tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether (TEGDME)-based electrolyte. Such an improvement can be attributed to the low DN and high polarity of the MeCN solvent, which promote the generation of Na2CO3 discharge products. The hybrid Na-CO2 battery based on MeCN cathode electrolyte also showed a power density of 2.59 mW cm-2, a value about 220% higher than that of the TEGDME-based electrolyte, as displayed in Figure 6F. The cycle performance tests revealed better cycle performance of the MeCN-based catholyte battery when compared to that based on TEGDME, with severe polarization noticed only after 860 h in the former case versus 400 h in the latter [Figure 6G]. The reason for this might have to do with the large structure of the TEGDME solvent requiring Na+ to break free from its five chelation sites to release Na+, while Na+ in the MeCN solvent can easily jump to the adjacent solvation structure with a relatively small diffusion barrier, as reported by theoretical calculations [Figure 6H][33]. This aspect endowed the MeCN catholyte with a unique solvation structure and a lower diffusion barrier, leading to improved electrochemical performance of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery.

The application of gel electrolytes in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries can effectively suppress the leakage of liquid electrolytes and endows the system with higher safety, yet their practical applications still face several challenges. First, the high viscosity, low ionic conductivity, and poor CO2 diffusion of gel electrolytes limit the kinetics of the CO2 reduction reaction when compared to traditional aqueous electrolytes. This, in turn, affects the power density and rate performance of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. Second, gel electrolytes subjected to high-current-density cycling are prone to oxidative decomposition, affecting the cycle stability of the battery. Furthermore, the poor temperature adaptability of gel electrolytes renders the application of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries for extreme environments more difficult. These drawbacks can be solved by optimizing the structure, conductivity, and temperature adaptability of the gel electrolyte to improve the overall performance of gel-based hybrid Na-CO2 batteries.

Molten-salt electrolytes

Another category of materials that can be used as battery catholytes is molten-salt electrolytes, usually composed of one or more metal cations and anions[66,67]. These ions exhibit excellent conductivity and chemical stability under high temperature conditions, making them useful for a wide range of electrochemical applications. As catholytes for hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, molten-salt electrolytes have several advantages. First, their non-flammable and non-volatile properties are particularly important for use in open systems, such as metal-gas batteries[68,69]. Second, the comparable ionic conductivity and electrochemical window of molten-salts to those of traditional organic electrolytes make them good alternative materials[70]. Importantly, the higher operating temperature of molten-salts further accelerates reaction kinetics for improved battery performance[71,72].

Based on the above characteristics, Zhong et al.[36] designed a NaNO3-KNO3-CsNO3 ternary molten-salt electrolyte by melting NaNO3 (26.4 wt%), KNO3 (27.3 wt%), and CsNO3 (46.3 wt%) to 200 °C. Afterward, a glass fiber membrane with a diameter of 12 mm was immersed in the melt to adsorb the molten-salt, and a molten-salt electrolyte membrane was obtained after cooling down. As shown in Figure 7A, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) characterization of the electrolyte revealed an ionic conductivity of the molten-salt electrolyte reaching up to 96 mS cm-1, a value 50-fold higher than that of the traditional organic electrolyte (1.78 mS cm-1 for 1 M NaClO4/TEGDME)[17]. The electrochemical stability of the molten-salt catholyte at 170 °C revealed an ESW of 1.6-4.2 V, a value comparable to that of organic electrolytes [Figure 7B]. The chemical stability of the catholyte evaluated at high temperature using the in-situ DEMS technique showed no decomposition of NaNO3-KNO3-CsNO3 molten-salt at 170 °C to produce nitrogen oxides, such as NO, NO2, and N2O. This confirmed the good stability of the nitrate system, without undergoing volatile decomposition under operating conditions [Figure 7C].

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 7. (A) Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and (B) ESW profiles of the molten-salt electrolyte, (C) in-situ DEMS curves during hybrid Na-CO2 battery operation at 170 °C, and (D) schematic structure of a hybrid Na-CO2 battery with molten-salt electrolyte; Electrochemical performance of hybrid Na-CO2 battery with molten-salt electrolyte: (E) charge-discharge curves, (F) rate performance, and (G) cycling performance. (H) Schematic of a hybrid Na-CO2 battery with a cathode. (A-H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[36]. Copyright © 2026 John Wiley & Sons. ESW: Electrochemical stability window; DEMS: differential electrochemical mass spectrometry; SP: super P.

Subsequently, the hybrid Na-CO2 battery was assembled according to the structure shown in Figure 7D to yield an Na-CO2 battery composed of molten-salt electrolyte and 1 M NaClO4/TEGDME electrolyte, followed by electrochemical performance evaluation under an argon and CO2 environment. Compared to the limited discharge specific capacity (2,345 mAh g-1) and poor Coulombic efficiency (43.1%) of traditional organic electrolytes, the respective discharge and charge capacities of the molten-salt-based hybrid Na-CO2 battery significantly improved to 4,852 mAh g-1 and 4,815 mAh g-1 [Figure 7E]. Also, the Coulombic efficiency of the molten-salt-based hybrid Na-CO2 battery reached 99.2%, a value close to 100%, with a charging platform voltage in the molten-salt system of only 3.2 V. Rate performance testing of the battery revealed the molten-salt battery maintaining a low charging plateau of approximately 3.4 V even at a high current density of 500 mA g-1, as shown by Figure 7F. By comparison, the batteries assembled with organic electrolytes exhibited severe polarization, with charging voltages exceeding 4.8 V at the same current density, rendering cycling impossible. Furthermore, the cycle performance characterization of the hybrid Na-CO2 battery revealed stable cycling for over 300 cycles at a cutoff discharge specific capacity of 1,000 mAh g-1, with a charging potential consistently below 3.5 V [Figure 7G]. By contrast, Na-CO2 batteries based on organic electrolytes typically require charging voltages exceeding 4.0 V and fail within 150 cycles. The fundamental mechanism behind this performance difference can be explained by the scheme illustrated in Figure 7H. In organic electrolytes, the insulating properties of Na2CO3 induce its continuous accumulation on the cathode, resulting in severe electrode passivation, parasitic side reactions, and gradual electrolyte decomposition, leading to rapid battery failure. Conversely, nitrate-based molten-salt electrolytes promote rapid Na+ transport and facilitate the efficient decomposition of Na2CO3, thereby minimizing side reactions and enabling stable and continuous battery cycling.

Therefore, the use of molten-salt electrolytes as the catholyte in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries can significantly improve the Coulombic efficiency and reduce the battery charging potential. However, the requirement for high temperatures to achieve high conductivity increases the complexity and cost of the battery system, limiting their application in room-temperature or low-temperature environments and challenging battery thermal management. Some electrode materials may also be unstable or undergo side reactions in a high-temperature molten-salt environment, affecting battery performance and lifespan. These drawbacks can be overcome to some extent by adopting specific strategies to reduce the operating temperature of molten-salt electrolytes and enhance their practical applications.

Solid-state electrolytes

The solid-state technology brings several advantages to the development of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries[73,74]. The first is a significant improvement in safety[22], since solid electrolytes are non-flammable and non-volatile, fundamentally eliminating the risks of flammability and leakage inherent in traditional liquid electrolytes with open cathode structures. Even under extreme conditions (such as high temperatures), solid electrolytes can effectively prevent thermal runaway and fire/explosion, significantly reducing battery safety risks. The second advantage is the significantly increased energy density of solid electrolytes[75,76]. As a result, solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 battery structures allow for more compact electrode designs and more efficient ion transport pathways. The wider ESW of solid electrolytes also allows battery operation under high voltage platforms to achieve higher energy densities. The third advantage is extended cycle life[77,78]. The use of solid electrolytes effectively prevents the volatilization problem of traditional liquid electrolytes under airflow disturbances, as well as avoiding the occurrence of side reactions, effectively improving the cycle life of the battery.

An ideal solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 battery cathode electrolyte should facilitate the conduction of electrons, Na+ and CO2 gas molecules to realize the so-called “tri-conductive” electrolytes. In this regard, Tong et al.[31] and Liu et al.[35] first melted a mixture of 92.5 wt% succinonitrile (SN) and 7.5 wt% NaClO4 to obtain a homogeneous SN-based solution [Figure 8A], and then drop-coated this mixture onto a prepared cathode at 50 °C to ensure full wetting onto the solid electrolyte membrane to form a solid-state cathode. As illustrated in Figure 8B, the use of this solid-state cathode switched the traditional “point-to-point” contact to “face-to-face” contact, effectively improving the interfacial contact between the cathode catalyst and the solid electrolyte. The XRD characterization of the SN-based electrolyte revealed almost vanished characteristic peaks of SN at 20° and 28° after mixing with NaClO4, effectively reducing the long-range order of SN [Figure 8C]. Subsequent assembly of the prepared solid-state cathode into a full cell resulted in a small semicircle in the high-frequency region of the EIS for the hybrid Na-CO2 battery without SN-based electrolyte, as displayed in Figure 8D, while capacitance and resistance were observed in the low-frequency region. In the presence of SN electrolyte, the EIS profile displayed a double semi-circular characteristic, indicative of the importance of the SN additive in significantly improving the rate of interfacial charge transfer. Evaluation of the battery electrochemical reactions using cyclic voltammetry revealed the presence of a significant redox peak for the battery containing an SN-based solid-state cathode, which accelerated the reaction rate and improved sodium ion diffusion [Figure 8E]. Stability tests on the all-solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 battery suggested a battery capable of stably cycling for 100 cycles at a current density of 50 mA g-1, with a stable cycle time of over 2,400 h [Figure 8F]. Furthermore, a comprehensive comparison with previously reported Na-CO2 batteries highlighted the superiority of batteries associated with SN-based solid-state cathodes in providing the best electrochemical performance [Figure 8G]. Together, these results show that the development of high-performance all-solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 batteries can not only provide a foundation for CO2 fixation and resource utilization but also provide a reliable energy supplement for outer space exploration [Figure 8H].

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 8. (A) Photos of succinonitrile (SN) with NaClO4. (A) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[31]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier; (B) Illustration of “point-to-point” and “face-to-face” contact between the cathode and NASICON. (B) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[35]. Copyright © 2025 Elsevier; (C) XRD patterns of SN with NaClO4. (C) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[31]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier; The electrochemical performance of hybrid Na-CO2 battery: (D)EIS curves, (E) CV curves, and (F) cycling curves. (G) Compared the key properties of Na-CO2 battery. (D-G) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[35]. Copyright © 2025 Elsevier; (H) Future application scenarios of solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. (H) Reprinted with permission from Ref.[31]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12; XRD: X-ray diffraction; CV: cyclic voltammetry; EIS: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; NZSP: Na3Zr2Si2PO12.

Despite the significant advantages of solid-state hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, their development is still in its early stages of exploration and faces several key challenges. First, the solid-solid contact between the solid electrolyte and the cathode results in a much higher interfacial impedance than that of liquid-solid contact. This might be problematic during charging and discharging processes, where volume changes in the cathode catalyst layer and the metal anode can lead to failure of interfacial contact. Second, the construction and maintenance of the three-phase reaction interface of electrons, ions, and gases in these cells poses problems since solid electrolytes cannot wet porous cathodes as liquids can, resulting in a scarcity of effective reaction sites. Solid products can also dynamically block the three-phase channels. More importantly, the decomposition kinetics of discharge products (such as Na2CO3) are slow, and all-solid configurations lack a flowable medium to assist their operation[31]. Once the solid products isolate the catalyst from the electrolyte, the charging process is terminated prematurely. Therefore, future research should focus on solid-solid interface optimization and efficient three-phase cathode structural design.

The electrochemical performances of the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries utilizing various catholytes are summarized in Table 1. The analysis suggests that the catholyte plays a decisive role in determining the overall electrochemical performance of the battery. Diverse electrolyte systems possess distinct physicochemical properties, each offering unique advantages in enhancing energy efficiency, prolonging cycle life, and improving battery safety. However, no single electrolyte could satisfy all ideal criteria simultaneously to deliver flawless electrochemical performance. Consequently, the development and optimization of catholytes require further advancement by optimally balancing ionic conduction, interfacial stability, and reaction kinetics to achieve a comprehensive breakthrough in the overall performance of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries.

Table 1

Comparative summary of the electrochemical performances of the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries with different catholytes

Electrolyte types Catholyte Discharge products Voltage gap, applied current Capacity (mAh g-1/mAh cm-2) Cyclability Refs.
Traditional aqueous electrolyte 0.1 M NaOH and seawater H2 ≈1.4 V, 50 mA g-1 210,000 mAh g-1 700 h [21]
1 M NaOH Formate 3 V, 5 mA cm-2 - 25 h [34]
0.5 M NaHCO3 CO 3 V, 4 mA cm-2 - 24 h
1 M NaOH CO/C2 chemicals 2.8 V, 8 mA cm-2 - -
Saturated NaCl solution Na2CO3 0.49 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 2,293 mAh g-1 300 cycles [25]
Water-in-salt electrolyte 17 m NaClO4 Na2CO3 1.65 V - 1,200 h [30]
35 m NaFSI HCOOH 0.92 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 55.1 mAh cm-2 452 cycles [28]
Na(FSI)24(ClO4)11 HCOOH 0.70 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 116.2 mAh cm-2 -
Na(FSI)30(ClO4)5 HCOOH 0.69 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 132.3 mAh cm-2 -
Na(FSI)27(ClO4)8 HCOOH 0.64 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 148.1 mAh cm-2 1,218 cycles
Gel electrolyte CNT-based gel electrolyte Na2C2O4 1.75 V, 0.1 mA cm-2 1,777 mAh g-1 367 cycles [32]
MeCN Na2CO3 ≈1.72 V, 50 μA cm-2 ≈2,200 μAh cm-2 860 h [33]
Molten-salt electrolyte NaNO3-KNO3-CsNO3 eutectic electrolyte Na2CO3 ≈1.2 V, 250 mA g-1 6,715 mAh g-1 300 cycles [36]
Solid-state electrolyte Succinonitrile Na2CO3 1.3 V, 50 mA g-1 28,830 mAh g-1 70 cycles [31]
Succinonitrile Na2CO3 1.43 V, 50 mA g-1 28,148.3 mAh g-1 2,400 h [35]

CONCLUSIONS AND OUTLOOK

Hybrid Na-CO2 batteries are promising platforms that synergistically combine energy storage with CO2 utilization. Compared to nonaqueous Na-CO2 batteries, hybrid systems offer distinct advantages, including intrinsically safe operation, efficient reaction kinetics enabled by high CO2 diffusion rate in water, prevented solid-product passivation through the formation of soluble discharge species, and the ability to steer the reduction pathway toward valuable chemicals (such as formate, CO, and C2 products). The nature and characteristics of the catholyte play a decisive role in determining the reaction mechanism, discharge product speciation, and overall battery performance. In this review, the fundamentals and advances of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries were discussed to gain a better understanding of the science and technology of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. The fundamental properties of hybrid Na-CO2 electrochemistry were provided, with the challenges and optimization strategies associated with battery catholytes. Considering the problems allowing further development of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries, some perspectives for high-performance hybrid Na-CO2 batteries are summarized in Figure 9.

Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO<sub>2</sub> batteries

Figure 9. Schematic illustration of future research for high-performance hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. NASICON: Na3Zr2Si2PO12; OSA: optical spectrum analyzer; FBG: fiber bragg grating.

In-depth understanding of reaction mechanisms

The electrochemical reaction pathways in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries highly depend on the catholyte composition, catalyst structure, and operating conditions, resulting in a complex interplay between CO2 reduction mechanisms and product distributions. The range of discharge products may include solids (such as Na2CO3 and Na2C2O4), liquids (such as HCOOH, C2H4, and C2H5OH), and gases (such as CO and H2). The reaction mechanisms are often inferred from these final discharge products, yet the precise reaction intermediates and their dynamic evolution under operating conditions are still poorly understood. While Na2CO3 and C are widely recognized as the primary products in most studies, the nucleation and growth of Na2CO3 into different macroscopic structures remains poorly understood. Thus, the precise control over the type of discharge products in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries is crucial since these directly affect key performance indicators of the battery, such as capacity, energy density, and cycle performance. Furthermore, the main sources and nature of the electrochemical side reactions in the hybrid Na-CO2 batteries still require clarification. Current research on the cycling reaction mechanism of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries mainly relies on ex-situ characterization [XRD, scanning electron microscope (SEM), Raman, TEM, X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), etc.] of the cathode catalyst layer before and after discharge and charging processes. However, capturing crucial dynamic information during actual charging and discharging processes using these methods remains challenging. Furthermore, real-time monitoring of gas consumption and byproducts during a complete battery cycle is still lacking. Therefore, future research should focus on using advanced operando/in-situ characterization techniques [such as XRD, DEMS, TEM, atomic force microscope (AFM), XPS, SEM, and XAS], widely employed in other battery systems, in combination with theoretical calculations to identify key reaction intermediates, monitor the nucleation and growth processes of discharge products, and reveal the reaction mechanisms of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries.

Design of multifunctional catholytes

The catholyte not only governs ion transport but also directly participates in the CO2 reduction reaction through the modulation of the local proton activity, solvation structure, and electrode/electrolyte interfacial micro-reaction environment. Furthermore, the chemical and thermal stability of the catholyte is equally crucial to the electrochemical stability of batteries with open cathode structures. The properties of the catholyte can be significantly affected by the nature and properties of the salts, solvents, and additives. Optimal components can be effectively screened using machine learning and computational methods. For aqueous and water-in-salt systems, water offers a range of advantages as a solvent, including high ionic conductivity and high safety, but its unstable electrochemical activity presents challenges. As a consequence, optimizing salt concentration, anion chemistry, and introducing multifunctional additives can regulate the properties of solvent water and the interfacial micro-reaction environment to expand the ESW and regulate the selectivity of discharge product formation. For example, introducing hydrophilic organic or inert inorganic compounds may form strong H-bonds between water molecules and some highly polar aprotic solvents, which may inhibit HER and expand the ESW. Similarly, introducing solute salts with different chemical properties may regulate the interfacial micro-reaction environment by forming different discharge products. For gel electrolytes, improving ionic conductivity, CO2 diffusivity, and mechanical robustness while maintaining long-term stability under gas-flow conditions remains a key challenge. For molten-salt electrolytes, reducing the operating temperature through eutectic composition engineering and exploring new low-melting-point systems may enhance the practical viability of the batteries. For solid-state systems, establishing efficient triple-phase boundaries and maintaining stable solid-solid contacts during cycling is essential. These issues can be solved by constructing three-dimensional mixed-conducting cathode architectures, incorporating compliant interfacial layers, and designing “tri-conductive” (electron, ion, and gas) networks. Finally, given the potential demand for hybrid Na-CO2 batteries in practical applications (such as Mars exploration), their low-temperature electrochemical performance is expected to hinder their applications under extreme conditions. This can be overcome by systematically exploring the influence mechanism of electrolyte components on ion transport behavior at low-temperatures, solvation structure stability, and desolvation kinetics at the electrode/electrolyte interface to optimize the catholyte. Specifically, the low-temperature electrochemical performance of batteries can be effectively improved by controlling the freezing point of the solvent system, adjusting the salt concentration to suppress low-temperature salt precipitation, or introducing functional additives to reduce interfacial charge transfer resistance. These electrolyte engineering strategies may result in high-performance hybrid Na-CO2 batteries combining superior energy density and wide temperature range adaptability, thereby providing key technical support for energy systems under special scenarios like deep space exploration.

Integration of emerging concepts and multifunctional systems

Current hybrid Na-CO2 batteries still suffer from issues, such as low round-trip efficiency, poor rate performance, and poor cycle stability. Improving catalyst performance should be addressed by solving the aforementioned issues of optimizing the cathode electrolyte, since both are linked by the mechanistic pathway at the interface. Integrating catholyte with emerging technologies offers a new way to overcome existing limitations. By introducing solvents or solutes with specific functions into the electrolyte, the electrochemical performance of the battery can be improved with the assistance of an external field. For instance, photo-assisted operation can leverage photogenerated carriers to reduce the overpotential and enhance reaction kinetics, potentially enabling more efficient CO2 conversion under mild conditions. Similarly, adding a substance sensitive to magnetic fields to the electrolyte, coupled with the application of an external magnetic field, can accelerate the migration rate of charge carriers in the electrolyte and guide their directional transport, thereby improving the rate performance and energy conversion efficiency of the battery. In addition to the two external-field assistance methods mentioned above, using non-thermal plasma to pre-activate CO2 or provide necessary active intermediates can effectively promote the CO2 reduction reaction and further improve the electrochemical performance of the battery.

System-level engineering and scalability

Beyond materials development, the practical realization of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries necessitates holistic system design. The open-cathode configuration raises challenges regarding electrolyte evaporation, CO2 supply management, and long-term operation under fluctuating environmental conditions. Flow-cell architectures can mitigate evaporation issues but introduce additional complexity and reduce gravimetric energy density. Therefore, developing novel hybrid Na-CO2 battery structures is vital to mitigate these issues. Examples of solutions include constructing Na-CO2 battery configurations with dual-membrane structures to integrate functions such as high-efficiency energy storage, CO2 recovery, value-added chemicals, and oxygen production, while effectively avoiding problems such as electrolyte volatilization. Sealing and gas management strategies must be carefully engineered to maintain a stable CO2 atmosphere while preventing moisture and oxygen infiltration that may degrade the sodium anode. Furthermore, the cost and availability of key components, including NASICON membranes, electrocatalysts, and electrolyte salts, ultimately determine the economic feasibility. Therefore, future efforts should focus on techno-economic assessments and life-cycle analyses to guide the selection of materials and architectures for balancing performance, durability, and cost.

In summary, current hybrid Na-CO2 batteries stand at a critical juncture where fundamental understanding, materials innovation, and system engineering must progress in parallel. The unique ability of these batteries to simultaneously store electrical energy while converting CO2 into value-added products makes them a compelling technology for carbon-neutral energy storage. However, achieving the required combination of high energy efficiency, long cycle life, and practical viability requires further sustainable research efforts across various disciplines, including electrochemistry, materials science, and chemical engineering. Continuous advances in catholyte design, mechanistic elucidation, and system integration would further improve hybrid Na-CO2 batteries for future sustainable energy infrastructures, particularly in niche applications where safety, environmental adaptability, and CO2 utilization are of paramount importance.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Conceived the review and wrote the manuscript: Yang, X.; Guo, X.; Dong, J.; Li, Q.; Gu, P.; Gao, X.

Revised and polished the manuscript: Yang, X.; Liang, F.; Xia, S.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

AI and AI-assisted tools statement

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22169016) and the Yunnan Key Laboratory of Crystalline Porous Organic Functional Materials (202449CE340024).

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2026.

REFERENCES

1. Vogt, E. T. C.; Weckhuysen, B. M. The refinery of the future. Nature 2024, 629, 295-306.

2. Soukharev, B. Why humans would not be able to stop global warming in the coming decades even if there were no climate feedbacks. In Global Warming and Mass Migration; Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. pp. 113-73.

3. Jacobson, T. A.; Kler, J. S.; Hernke, M. T.; Braun, R. K.; Meyer, K. C.; Funk, W. E. Direct human health risks of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nat. Sustain. 2019, 2, 691-701.

4. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Khan, S.; Banerjee, A.; Pramanik, D. An overview on the evolution of metal-CO2 batteries: focus on aqueous Zn-CO2 batteries. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 2025, 577, 122441.

5. Zou, J.; Gupta, D.; Liang, G. CO2 utilization in energy storage and conversion. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025, 13, 32004-29.

6. Sarkar, A.; Dharmaraj, V. R.; Yi, C. H.; et al. Recent advances in rechargeable metal-CO2 batteries with nonaqueous electrolytes. Chem. Rev. 2023, 123, 9497-564.

7. Zou, J.; Gupta, D.; Yuwono, J. A.; Zhang, S.; Guo, Z. The promises and reality of metal-CO2 batteries. Nat. Rev. Clean. Technol. 2025, 1, 699-718.

8. Xu, C.; Zhao, H.; Chen, L.; Shi, W.; Shao, G.; Lei, Y. Deciphering intricacies in directional CO2 conversion from electrolysis to CO2 batteries. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2026, e70796.

9. He, B.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, F.; et al. Understanding electrolytes and interface chemistry for sustainable nonaqueous metal-CO2 batteries. NanoMicro. Lett. 2025, 17, 299.

10. Xu, C.; Dong, Y.; Shen, Y.; et al. Fundamental understanding of nonaqueous and hybrid Na-CO2 batteries: challenges and perspectives. Small 2023, 19, e2206445.

11. Lin, J.; Song, W.; Xiao, C.; et al. A comprehensive overview of the electrochemical mechanisms in emerging alkali metal-carbon dioxide batteries. Carbon. Energy. 2023, 5, e313.

12. Yao, A.; Benson, S. M.; Chueh, W. C. Critically assessing sodium-ion technology roadmaps and scenarios for techno-economic competitiveness against lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Energy. 2025, 10, 404-16.

13. Usiskin, R.; Lu, Y.; Popovic, J.; et al. Fundamentals, status and promise of sodium-based batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 1020-35.

14. Sun, J.; Lu, Y.; Yang, H.; Han, M.; Shao, L.; Chen, J. Rechargeable Na-CO2 batteries starting from cathode of Na2CO3 and carbon nanotubes. Research 2018, 2018, 6914626.

15. Qiu, X.; Chen, Y.; Sun, Y.; et al. Research on low-temperature sodium-ion batteries: challenges, strategies and prospect. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2024, 72, 103760.

16. Liu, Y.; Xu, S.; Zhu, H.; et al. Ultrafine Na3V2(PO4)3@C with boosted interfacial charge transfer kinetics for low-temperature (-40 °C) Na-ion battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 504, 158704.

17. Hu, X.; Sun, J.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, C.; Chen, J. Rechargeable room-temperature Na-CO2 batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 6482-6.

18. Cai, F.; Hu, Z.; Chou, S. Progress and future perspectives on Li(Na)-CO2 batteries. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2018, 2, 1800060.

19. Wang, Z.; Mao, Y.; Sheng, L.; Sun, C. Robust solid-state Na-CO2 battery with Na2.7Zr2Si2PO11.7F0.3-PVDF-HFP composite solid electrolyte and Na15Sn4/Na anode. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 12706-16.

20. Fang, C.; Luo, J.; Jin, C.; et al. Enhancing catalyzed decomposition of Na2CO3 with Co2MnOx nanowire-decorated carbon fibers for advanced Na-CO2 batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 17240-8.

21. Kim, C.; Kim, J.; Joo, S.; et al. Efficient CO2 utilization via a hybrid Na-CO2 system based on CO2 dissolution. iScience 2018, 9, 278-85.

22. Hu, X.; Li, Z.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Quasi-solid state rechargeable Na-CO2 batteries with reduced graphene oxide Na anodes. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1602396.

23. Jena, A.; Tong, Z.; Chang, H.; Hu, S.; Liu, R. Capturing carbon dioxide in Na-CO2 batteries: a route for green energy. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2021, 68, 421-8.

24. Thoka, S.; Tong, Z.; Jena, A.; et al. High-performance Na-CO2 batteries with ZnCo2O4@CNT as the cathode catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8, 23974-82.

25. Xu, C.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, D.; et al. Reversible hybrid sodium-CO2 batteries with low charging voltage and long-life. Nano. Energy. 2020, 68, 104318.

26. Xie, J.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y. Metal-CO2 batteries at the crossroad to practical energy storage and CO2 recycle. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908285.

27. Xu, G.; Shangguan, X.; Dong, S.; Zhou, X.; Cui, G. Formulation of blended-lithium-salt electrolytes for lithium batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3400-15.

28. Yang, X.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, L.; et al. Upgrading cycling stability and capability of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries via tailoring reaction environment for efficient conversion CO2 to HCOOH. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2024, 14, 2304365.

29. Zhang, X.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, H.; et al. Recent advances in wide-range temperature metal-CO2 batteries: a mini review. NanoMicro. Lett. 2024, 17, 99.

30. Im, E.; Ryu, J. H.; Baek, K.; Moon, G. D.; Kang, S. J. “Water-in-salt” and NASICON electrolyte-based Na-CO2 battery. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2021, 37, 424-32.

31. Tong, Z.; Wang, S.; Fang, M.; et al. Na-CO2 battery with NASICON-structured solid-state electrolyte. Nano. Energy. 2021, 85, 105972.

32. Xu, B.; Zhang, D.; Chang, S.; et al. Fabrication of long-life quasi-solid-state Na-CO2 battery by formation of Na2C2O4 discharge product. Cell. Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3, 100973.

33. Im, E.; Mun, J.; Pourasad, S.; et al. Unveiling the electrochemical characteristics of acetonitrile-catholyte-based Na-CO2 battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 476, 146740.

34. Kim, J.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.; et al. Anode-less hybrid Na-CO2 battery with sodium harvesting from seawater for both electricity storage and various chemical production. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2023, 8, 5079-87.

35. Liu, J.; Zhi, C.; Li, S.; et al. Development of advanced rechargeable Na-CO2 solid-state batteries with single-atom Ru-coordinated HOF cathode: Implications for Mars exploration. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 525, 170490.

36. Zhong, H.; Yang, T.; Mu, X.; Li, W.; Zhou, H.; He, P. Breaking the reversibility barrier in Na-CO2 batteries: a molten-salt electrolyte and catalytic RuO2 design. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e74254.

37. Mu, X.; He, P.; Zhou, H. Toward practical Li-CO2 batteries: mechanisms, catalysts, and perspectives. Acc. Mater. Res. 2024, 5, 467-78.

38. Fetrow, C. J.; Carugati, C.; Zhou, X.; Wei, S. Electrochemistry of metal-CO2 batteries: opportunities and challenges. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2022, 45, 911-33.

39. Gupta, D.; Zou, J.; Mao, J.; Guo, Z. Concurrent energy storage and decarbonization by metal-CO2 batteries: aqueous or non-aqueous? Energy. Environ. Sci. 2025, 18, 5215-49.

40. Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Xia, X.; Cai, W.; Chen, Q.; Chen, M. Metal-CO2 electrochemistry: from CO2 recycling to energy storage. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2100667.

41. Zhan, J.; Hua, Z.; Wu, F.; Li, Q. Preparation and electrochemical performance of nitrogen-doped carbon-coated CuxS nanobox catalyst for hybrid Na-CO2 batteries. Trans. Nonferrous. Met. Soc. China. 2026, 36, 929-42.

42. Suo, L.; Borodin, O.; Gao, T.; et al. “Water-in-salt” electrolyte enables high-voltage aqueous lithium-ion chemistries. Science 2015, 350, 938-43.

43. Zhanadilov, O.; Akhmetova, A.; Jin, Y.; Myung, S. Hydrogen evolution in lithium water-in-salt electrolytes. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2026, 11, 1035-45.

44. Dong, D.; Zhao, C. X.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C. Aqueous electrolytes: from salt in water to water in salt and beyond. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2418700.

45. Dubouis, N.; Lemaire, P.; Mirvaux, B.; Salager, E.; Deschamps, M.; Grimaud, A. The role of the hydrogen evolution reaction in the solid-electrolyte interphase formation mechanism for “Water-in-Salt” electrolytes. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3491-9.

46. Wang, Q.; Qu, Z. Localized insight into potential-switched structure and hierarchical transport of water-in-salt electrolyte at electrified interfaces. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2026, 86, 104959.

47. Vazquez, D.; Ingenmey, J.; Trapp, K.; Ciliak, D.; Salanne, M.; Lukatskaya, M. R. Extended stability window in water-in-salt electrolytes: understanding the origins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 35953-61.

48. Zhou, A.; Zhang, J.; Chen, M.; et al. An electric-field-reinforced hydrophobic cationic sieve lowers the concentration threshold of water-in-salt electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 2022, 34, e2207040.

49. Roy, R.; Das, T.; Goddard, W. A.; Singh, A. K. Ultra-robust zinc-ion batteries with Co-solvent water-in-salt electrolytes for enhanced stability and capacity. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2026, 14, 7058-70.

50. Lin, S.; Hua, H.; Lai, P.; Zhao, J. A Multifunctional dual-salt localized high-concentration electrolyte for fast dynamic high-voltage lithium battery in wide temperature range. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2101775.

51. Dong, Q.; Yao, X.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Cathodically stable Li-O2 battery operations using water-in-salt electrolyte. Chem 2018, 4, 1345-58.

52. Manikkoth, M.; Akhi, M. G.; Manoj, V.; Rajan, T. P. D. Towards sustainable Al-air batteries: electrolyte engineering using water-in-salt chemistry for improved performance. J. Energy. Storage. 2026, 143, 119544.

53. Jung, T.; Jung, J.; Lee, J.; Yang, S.; Lee, B. Suppressing hydrogen evolution with artificial interfaces for high-voltage and wide-temperature aqueous supercapacitors. J. Energy. Storage. 2026, 148, 120126.

54. Dou, Q.; Lei, S.; Wang, D.; et al. Safe and high-rate supercapacitors based on an “acetonitrile/water in salt” hybrid electrolyte. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3212-9.

55. Qiao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Mu, X.; et al. Advanced hybrid electrolyte Li-O2 battery realized by dual superlyophobic membrane. Joule 2019, 3, 2986-3001.

56. Hao, Y.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Concentration-tuned reduction pathway for aqueous lithium-carbon dioxide batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026, 18, 10648-57.

57. Lu, J.; Chen, Y.; Lei, Y.; Jaumaux, P.; Tian, H.; Wang, G. Quasi-solid gel electrolytes for alkali metal battery applications. NanoMicro. Lett. 2025, 17, 194.

58. Park, J.; Shin, H.; Lee, W.; Li, S.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, B. J. Elastomeric polymer network electrolyte: synthesis, properties, and applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2025, 163, 101944.

59. Zhang, R.; Li, C.; Yang, B.; et al. Fluorinated gel polymer electrolytes for high performance lithium metal batteries: a mechanism analysis and systematic review. Sci. China. Chem. 2025, 68, 4712-32.

60. Vallier, T.; Nuernberg, R. B.; Issa, S.; et al. Understanding Na+ diffusion, physicochemical behavior, and electrochemical performance of a gel polymer electrolyte. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 29077-86.

61. Sun, X.; Wen, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. A Hydrogel electrolyte-based Zn-CO2 battery with improved life. Small 2025, 21, e2411867.

62. Wang, Q.; Xin, Y.; An, G.; et al. 1,3,2-dioxathiolane 2,2-dioxide additive in carbonate-based gel polymer electrolyte enables dual-Interface stabilization for high-performance long-cycling sodium metal batteries. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2026, 702, 138841.

63. Huang, Q.; Song, J.; Gao, Y.; Wang, D. Elastic and stretchable gel polymer electrolyte coating to improve long-term cycling stability of high-areal-capacity sio electrode for lithium-ion battery. Meet. Abstr. 2017, MA2017-02, 76-76.

64. Feng, J.; Wang, J.; Gu, Q.; et al. 1 µm-thick robust gel polymer electrolyte with excellent interfacial stability for high-performance Li metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Materials. 2025, 35, 2412287.

65. Cao, F.; Wu, B.; Li, T.; Sun, S.; Jiao, Y.; Wu, P. Mechanoadaptive morphing gel electrolyte enables flexible and fast-charging Zn-ion batteries with outstanding dendrite suppression performance. Nano. Res. 2022, 15, 2030-9.

66. Dong, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, F.; et al. Molten salt electrolyte for enhanced low-temperature sodium liquid metal batteries. Energy. Environ. Mater. 2026, e70334.

67. Wang, W.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, S.; et al. Molten salt electrolyte enables micro-sized silicon anode in lithium-ion batteries. Energy. Environ. Mater. 2026, 9, e70111.

68. Liu, S.; Han, W.; Cui, B.; et al. A novel rechargeable zinc-air battery with molten salt electrolyte. J. Power. Sources. 2017, 342, 435-41.

69. Koo, D.; Kang, S. J. Nitrate molten salt electrolytes with iron oxide catalysts for open and sealed Li-O2 batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 47740-8.

70. Wang, Z.; Xu, Y.; Peng, J.; et al. A high rate and stable hybrid Li/Na-ion battery based on a hydrated molten inorganic salt electrolyte. Small 2021, 17, e2101650.

71. Wang, D.; Yang, J.; He, P.; Zhou, H. A low-charge-overpotential lithium-CO2 cell based on a binary molten salt electrolyte. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 4107-14.

72. Sun, X.; Wang, D.; Wen, Z.; Li, W.; Zhou, H.; He, P. An inorganic molten salt electrolyte-based Li-CO2 battery with moderate working temperature and enhanced performance. Chem. Commun. 2024, 60, 8772-5.

73. Xu, Y.; Xu, Z.; Lee, S. Y.; Wu, Z. S. Recent progress and perspectives on highly-safe and energy-dense solid-state Li-CO2 batteries. Sci. Bull. 2025, 70, 135-9.

74. Wang, Z.; Sun, C.; Lu, L.; Jiao, L. Recent progress and perspectives of solid state Na-CO2 batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 36.

75. Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Y.; et al. Flexible and tailorable Na-CO2 batteries based on an all-solid-state polymer electrolyte. ChemElectroChem 2018, 5, 3628-32.

76. Zhou, J.; Li, X.; Yang, C.; et al. A quasi-solid-state flexible fiber-shaped Li-CO2 battery with low overpotential and high energy efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1804439.

77. Wang, S.; Xu, K.; Song, H.; et al. A High-energy long-cycling solid-state lithium-metal battery operating at high temperatures. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2022, 12, 2201866.

78. Hu, X.; Joo, P. H.; Matios, E.; et al. Designing an all-solid-state sodium-carbon dioxide battery enabled by nitrogen-doped nanocarbon. Nano. Lett. 2020, 20, 3620-6.

Cite This Article

Review
Open Access
Exploring the frontiers of catholyte in hybrid Na-CO2 batteries

How to Cite

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Export Citation File:

Type of Import

Tips on Downloading Citation

This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.

Citation Manager File Format

Use the radio buttons to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex.

Type of Import

If you have citation management software installed on your computer your Web browser should be able to import metadata directly into your reference database.

Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.

Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.

About This Article

Special Topic

This article belongs to the Special Topic Advanced Functional Materials for Battery Applications
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: All statements, opinions, and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of OAE and/or the editor(s). OAE and/or the editor(s) disclaim any responsibility for harm to persons or property resulting from the use of any ideas, methods, instructions, or products mentioned in the content.
© The Author(s) 2026. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
6
Downloads
0
Citations
0
Comments
0
0

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at [email protected].

0
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Energy Materials
ISSN 2770-5900 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/