REFERENCES
1. Yang, Q.; Jin, W.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Mixed-modality speech recognition and interaction using a wearable artificial throat. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023, 5, 169-80.
2. Brown, S.; Laird, A. R.; Pfordresher, P. Q.; Thelen, S. M.; Turkeltaub, P.; Liotti, M. The somatotopy of speech: phonation and articulation in the human motor cortex. Brain. Cogn. 2009, 70, 31-41.
3. Khanna, P.; Srivastava, T.; Pan, S.; Jain, S.; Nguyen, P. JawSense: recognizing unvoiced sound using a low-cost ear-worn system. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Virtual, February 24-26, 2021; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp 44-9.
4. Gonzalez-Lopez, J. A.; Gomez-Alanis, A.; Martín-Doñas, J. M.; Pérez-Córdoba, J. L.; Gomez, A. M. Silent speech interfaces for speech restoration: a review. IEEE. Access. 2020, 8, 177995-8021.
5. Dong, P.; Song, Y.; Yu, S.; et al. Electromyogram-based lip-reading via unobtrusive dry electrodes and machine learning methods. Small 2023, 19, 2205058.
6. Betts, B. J.; Binsted, K.; Jorgensen, C. Small-vocabulary speech recognition using surface electromyography. Interact. Comput. 2006, 18, 1242-59.
7. Beukelman, D. R.; Mirenda, P. Augmentative and alternative communication; P.H. Brookes Pub., 1998. https://books.google.com/books/about/Augmentative_and_Alternative_Communicati.html?id=LPraAAAAMAAJ (accessed 2026-06-16).
8. Cheok, M. J.; Omar, Z.; Jaward, M. H. A review of hand gesture and sign language recognition techniques. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cyber. 2017, 10, 131-53.
9. Bulling, A.; Ward, J. A.; Gellersen, H.; Tröster, G. Eye movement analysis for activity recognition using electrooculography. IEEE. Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011, 33, 741-53.
10. Lee, W.; Seong, J. J.; Ozlu, B.; Shim, B. S.; Marakhimov, A.; Lee, S. Biosignal sensors and deep learning-based speech recognition: a review. Sensors 2021, 21, 1399.
11. Lu, Y.; Tian, H.; Cheng, J.; et al. Decoding lip language using triboelectric sensors with deep learning. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1401.
12. Meltzner, G. S.; Heaton, J. T.; Deng, Y.; De Luca, G.; Roy, S. H.; Kline, J. C. Development of sEMG sensors and algorithms for silent speech recognition. J. Neural. Eng. 2018, 15, 046031.
13. Zhang, Q.; Wang, D.; Zhao, R.; Yu, Y. SoundLip: enabling word and sentence-level lip interaction for smart devices. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2021, 5, 1-28.
14. Gohel, V.; Mehendale, N. Review on electromyography signal acquisition and processing. Biophys. Rev. 2020, 12, 1361-7.
15. Schultz, T.; Wand, M.; Hueber, T.; Krusienski, D. J.; Herff, C.; Brumberg, J. S. Biosignal-based spoken communication: a survey. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2017, 25, 2257-71.
16. Tang, C.; Qi, L.; Gao, S.; et al. Sensing technologies for silent speech interfaces. Nat. Sens. 2026, 1, 16-26.
17. Boufidis, D.; Garg, R.; Angelopoulos, E.; Cullen, D. K.; Vitale, F. Bio-inspired electronics: soft, biohybrid, and “living” neural interfaces. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1861.
18. Lin, K.; Hong, W.; Huang, C.; et al. Stretchable high-density surface electromyography electrode patch assisted with machine learning for silent speech recognition. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2025, 234, 7541-9.
19. Sahni, H.; Bedri, A.; Reyes, G.; et al. The tongue and ear interface: a wearable system for silent speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Seattle, USA, September 13-17, 2014; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp 47-54.
20. Wang, K.; Li, Z.; Cai, Z.; et al. The applications of flexible electronics in dental, oral, and craniofacial medicine. npj. Flex. Electron. 2024, 8, 33.
21. Silva, A. B.; Littlejohn, K. T.; Liu, J. R.; Moses, D. A.; Chang, E. F. The speech neuroprosthesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2024, 25, 473-92.
22. Tankisi, H.; Burke, D.; Cui, L.; et al. Standards of instrumentation of EMG. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2020, 131, 243-58.
23. Daniel, Ţ. D.; Neagu, M. Cancelling harmonic power line interference in biopotentials. In Compendium of New Techniques in Harmonic Analysis; IntechOpen, 2018; pp 19-37.
24. Zhang, Q.; Lan, Y.; Guo, K.; Wang, D. Lipwatch: enabling silent speech recognition on smartwatches using acoustic sensing. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2024, 8, 1-29.
25. Kaifosh, P.; Reardon, T. R.; CTRL-labs at Reality Labs. A generic non-invasive neuromotor interface for human-computer interaction. Nature 2025, 645, 702-11.
26. Liu, L.; Ji, Y.; Wang, H.; Denby, B. Comparison of DCT and autoencoder-based features for DNN-HMM multimodal silent speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 2016 10th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP), Tianjin, China, October 17-20, 2016; IEEE, 2016.
27. Rabiner, L. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc. IEEE. 1989, 77, 257-86.
28. Baum, L. E.; Petrie, T.; Soules, G.; Weiss, N. A maximization technique occurring in the statistical analysis of probabilistic functions of Markov chains. Ann. Math. Statist. 1970, 41, 164-71.
29. Song, R.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; et al. Decoding silent speech from high-density surface electromyographic data using transformer. Biomed. Signal. Process. Control. 2023, 80, 104298.
30. Gaddy, D.; Klein, D. An improved model for voicing silent speech. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Virtual, August 1-6, 2021; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2021; pp 175-81.
31. Freitas, J.; Teixeira, A.; Sales Dias, M.; Silva, S. An introduction to silent speech interfaces; Springer Cham, 2017.
32. CNX Anatomy. Side views of the muscles of facial expressions. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:1106_Side_Views_of_the_Muscles_of_Facial_Expressions.jpg (accessed 2026-06-16).
33. Wikipedia. Silent Speech Interface. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_speech_interface (accessed 2026-06-16).
34. Moses, D. A.; Metzger, S. L.; Liu, J. R.; et al. Neuroprosthesis for decoding speech in a paralyzed person with anarthria. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 217-27.
35. Metzger, S. L.; Liu, J. R.; Moses, D. A.; et al. Generalizable spelling using a speech neuroprosthesis in an individual with severe limb and vocal paralysis. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6510.
36. Simonyan, K.; Horwitz, B. Laryngeal motor cortex and control of speech in humans. Neuroscientist 2011, 17, 197-208.
37. Metzger, S. L.; Littlejohn, K. T.; Silva, A. B.; et al. A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control. Nature 2023, 620, 1037-46.
38. Willett, F. R.; Kunz, E. M.; Fan, C.; et al. A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis. Nature 2023, 620, 1031-6.
39. Chen, X.; Wang, R.; Khalilian-gourtani, A.; et al. A neural speech decoding framework leveraging deep learning and speech synthesis. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 467-80.
40. Macdonald, D. B.; Skinner, S.; Shils, J. Yingling, C; American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2013, 124, 2291-316.
42. Zhang, Y.; Cai, H.; Wu, J.; et al. EMG-based cross-subject silent speech recognition using conditional domain adversarial network. IEEE. Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 2023, 15, 2282-90.
43. Janke, M.; Diener, L. EMG-to-speech: direct generation of speech from facial electromyographic signals. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2017, 25, 2375-85.
44. Gaddy, D.; Klein, D. Digital voicing of silent speech. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), Virtual, November 16-20, 2020; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2020; pp 5521-30.
45. Cleveland Clinic. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/15066-temporomandibular-disorders-tmd-overview (accessed 2026-06-16).
46. Srivastava, T.; Khanna, P.; Pan, S.; Nguyen, P.; Jain, S. MuteIt: Jaw motion based unvoiced command recognition using earable. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2022, 6, 1-26.
47. Rekimoto, J.; Nishimura, Y. Derma: silent speech interaction using transcutaneous motion sensing. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans Conference 2021, Rovaniemi, Finland, February 22-24, 2021; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp 91-100.
48. Bedri, A.; Sahni, H.; Thukral, P.; et al. Toward silent-speech control of consumer wearables. Computer 2015, 48, 54-62.
49. Huo, X.; Park, H.; Kim, J.; Ghovanloo, M. A dual-mode human computer interface combining speech and tongue motion for people with severe disabilities. IEEE. Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2013, 21, 979-91.
50. Hofe, R.; Ell, S. R.; Fagan, M. J.; et al. Small-vocabulary speech recognition using a silent speech interface based on magnetic sensing. Speech. Commun. 2013, 55, 22-32.
51. Heracleous, P.; Badin, P.; Bailly, G.; Hagita, N. A pilot study on augmented speech communication based on Electro-Magnetic Articulography. Pattern. Recogn. Lett. 2011, 32, 1119-25.
52. Kimura, N.; Gemicioglu, T.; Womack, J.; et al. SilentSpeller: Towards mobile, hands-free, silent speech text entry using electropalatography. In CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New Orleans, LA, USA, April 29-May 5, 2022; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp 1-19.
53. Wei, Y.; Qiao, Y.; Jiang, G.; et al. A wearable skinlike ultra-sensitive artificial graphene throat. ACS. Nano. 2019, 13, 8639-47.
54. Che, Z.; Wan, X.; Xu, J.; Duan, C.; Zheng, T.; Chen, J. Speaking without vocal folds using a machine-learning-assisted wearable sensing-actuation system. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1873.
55. Sugden, E.; Cleland, J. Using ultrasound tongue imaging to support the phonetic transcription of childhood speech sound disorders. Clin. Linguist. Phon. 2021, 36, 1047-66.
56. Liu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Xu, M.; et al. Decoding and synthesizing tonal language speech from brain activity. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadh0478.
57. Mallat, S. G. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE. Trans. Pattern. Anal. Machine. Intell. 1989, 11, 674-93.
58. Schuster, M.; Paliwal, K. Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE. Trans. Signal. Process. 1997, 45, 2673-81.
59. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; et al. Attention is all you need. In Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, December 4-9, 2017; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp 6000-10.
60. Lecun, Y.; Bottou, L.; Bengio, Y.; Haffner, P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc. IEEE. 1998, 86, 2278-324.
61. Van Den Oord, A.; Dieleman, S.; Zen, H.; et al. WaveNet: a generative model for raw audio. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1609.03499. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.03499 (accessed 16 June 2026).
62. Kong, J.; Kim, J.; Bae, J. HiFi-GAN: generative adversarial networks for efficient and high fidelity speech synthesis. In Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, December 6-12, 2020; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp 17022-33.
63. Wang, Y.; Tang, T.; Xu, Y.; et al. All-weather, natural silent speech recognition via machine-learning-assisted tattoo-like electronics. npj. Flex. Electron. 2021, 5, 20.
64. Dong, P.; Tian, S.; Chen, S.; et al. Decoding silent speech cues from muscular biopotential signals for efficient human-robot collaborations. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2024, 10, 2400990.
65. Denby, B.; Schultz, T.; Honda, K.; Hueber, T.; Gilbert, J.; Brumberg, J. Silent speech interfaces. Speech. Commun. 2010, 52, 270-87.
66. Beck, T. W.; Housh, T. J.; Cramer, J. T.; et al. A comparison of monopolar and bipolar recording techniques for examining the patterns of responses for electromyographic amplitude and mean power frequency versus isometric torque for the vastus lateralis muscle. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2007, 166, 159-67.
67. Stepp, C. E. Surface electromyography for speech and swallowing systems: measurement, analysis, and interpretation. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 2012, 55, 1232-46.
68. De Luca, C. J. The use of surface electromyography in biomechanics. J. Appl. Biomech. 1997, 13, 135-63.
69. Meltzner, G. S.; Heaton, J. T.; Deng, Y.; De Luca, G.; Roy, S. H.; Kline, J. C. Silent speech recognition as an alternative communication device for persons with laryngectomy. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2017, 25, 2386-98.
70. Bio-medical. Silver-Silver Chloride EEG/ECG/EMG Electrodes - 6 pack. https://bio-medical.com/silver-silver-chloride-eeg-ecg-emg-electrodes-6-pack.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw6auyBhDzARIsALIo6v9vEmZic2JdDesJlj94CqziGqhBReVs9kl72TBiusniSyRpyEyv4rEaAj_0EALw_wcB (accessed 2024-05).
71. Bio-medical. Kendall Disposable Surface EMG/ECG/EKG Electrodes 1” (24mm) 50pkg. https://bio-medical.com/covidien-kendall-disposable-surface-emg-ecg-ekg-electrodes-1-24mm-50pkg.html?gclid=Cj0KCQjw6auyBhDzARIsALIo6v82RA28LQxjTsIdC_r32s-l0PQ3o5S9e2t8EyiGe1uXXtacuTcOuKwaApOCEALw_wcB (accessed 2024-05).
72. Yao, S.; Zhu, Y. Nanomaterial-enabled dry electrodes for electrophysiological sensing: a review. JOM 2016, 68, 1145-55.
73. Zhou, W.; Yao, S.; Wang, H.; Du, Q.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, Y. Gas-permeable, ultrathin, stretchable epidermal electronics with porous electrodes. ACS. Nano. 2020, 14, 5798-805.
74. Yao, S.; Yang, J.; Poblete, F. R.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Y. Multifunctional electronic textiles using silver nanowire composites. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 31028-37.
75. Qin, Q.; Li, J.; Yao, S.; Liu, C.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y. Electrocardiogram of a silver nanowire based dry electrode: quantitative comparison with the standard Ag/AgCl gel electrode. IEEE. Access. 2019, 7, 20789-800.
76. Prasad, S.; Farella, M.; Paulin, M.; Yao, S.; Zhu, Y.; Van Vuuren, L. J. Effect of electrode characteristics on electromyographic activity of the masseter muscle. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2021, 56, 102492.
77. Ariati, R.; Sales, F.; Souza, A.; Lima, R. A.; Ribeiro, J. Polydimethylsiloxane composites characterization and its applications: a review. Polymers 2021, 13, 4258.
78. Luo, Y.; Abidian, M. R.; Ahn, J.; et al. Technology roadmap for flexible sensors. ACS. Nano. 2023, 17, 5211-95.
79. Wang, S.; Li, M.; Wu, J.; et al. Mechanics of epidermal electronics. J. Appl. Mech. 2012, 79, 031022.
80. Dong, P.; Ives, J.; Garcia, E.; et al. Unobtrusive swallow monitoring enabled by conformal IONOGEL biopotential electrodes and machine learning. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2025, 10, e00229.
81. Wang, J.; Fan, J.; Wan, T.; Hu, L.; Li, Z.; Chu, D. Recent progress in silver nanowire-based transparent conductive electrodes. Adv. Energy. Sustain. Res. 2025, 6, 2500033.
82. Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, L.; et al. Glassy ionogels with high compressibility and strength for impact protection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2025, 122, e2417978122.
83. Tang, C.; Mallah, J.; Kazieczko, D.; et al. Wireless silent speech interface using multichannel textile EMG sensors integrated into headphones. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2025, 74, 1-10.
84. ADInstrument. EMG. https://www.adinstruments.com/signal/emg-electromyography (accessed 2026-06-16).
85. OpenBCI. Cyton getting started guide. https://docs.openbci.com/GettingStarted/Boards/CytonGS/ (accessed 2026-06-16).
86. Delsys. Trigno Quattro sensor. https://delsys.com/trigno-quattro/#design (accessed 2026-06-16).
88. Wikipedia. Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist%E2%80%93Shannon_sampling_theorem (accessed 2026-06-16).
89. Woodman, S. J.; Shah, D. S.; Landesberg, M.; Agrawala, A.; Kramer-bottiglio, R. Stretchable Arduinos embedded in soft robots. Sci. Robot. 2024, 9, eadn6844.
90. Chung, H. U.; Kim, B. H.; Lee, J. Y.; et al. Binodal, wireless epidermal electronic systems with in-sensor analytics for neonatal intensive care. Science 2019, 363, eaau0780.
91. Kalogeropoulos, C.; Theofilatos, K.; Mavroudi, S. From neurons to networks: a holistic review of electroencephalography (EEG) from neurophysiological foundations to AI techniques. Signals 2026, 7, 17.
93. Min, B.; Kim, J.; Park, H.; Lee, B. Vowel imagery decoding toward silent speech BCI using extreme learning machine with electroencephalogram. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 1-11.
94. Inoue, M.; Hatakeyama, E.; Kita, Y.; Sasai, S. Large-scale training data enhances silent speech decoding with around-ear EEG. J. Neural. Eng. 2026, 23, 026027.
95. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 23, 107-10.
96. Jackson, A. F.; Bolger, D. J. The neurophysiological bases of EEG and EEG measurement: a review for the rest of us. Psychophysiology 2014, 51, 1061-71.
98. Jain, A.; Raja, R.; Srivastava, S.; Sharma, P. C.; Gangrade, J.; R, M. Analysis of EEG signals and data acquisition methods: a review. Comput. Methods. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging. Vis. 2024, 12, 2304574.
99. Malmivuo, J.; Plonsey, R. Electroencephalography. In Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields; Oxford University Press, 1995; pp 257-64.
100. Etard, O.; Reichenbach, T. Neural speech tracking in the theta and in the delta frequency band differentially encode clarity and comprehension of speech in noise. J. Neurosci. 2019, 39, 5750-9.
101. Synigal, S. R.; Teoh, E. S.; Lalor, E. C. Including measures of high gamma power can improve the decoding of natural speech from EEG. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 130.
102. Bröhl, F.; Kayser, C. Delta/theta band EEG differentially tracks low and high frequency speech-derived envelopes. Neuroimage 2021, 233, 117958.
103. Zhou, J.; Cao, Z.; Duan, Y.; et al. Pretraining large brain language model for active BCI: silent speech. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Dublin, Ireland, October 27-31, 2025; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2025, pp 5883-92.
104. Panachakel, J. T.; Ramakrishnan, A. G. Decoding covert speech from EEG - a comprehensive review. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 642251.
105. Brownlee, A.; Bruening, L. Living with ALS: changes in speech and communication solutions. https://www.als.org/sites/default/files/2022-10/Resource-Guide-9.pdf (accessed 2022-06).
106. Brigham, K.; Kumar, B. V. K. V. Imagined speech classification with eeg signals for silent communication: a preliminary investigation into synthetic telepathy. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, China, June 18-20, 2010; IEEE, 2010, pp 1-4.
107. Suppes, P.; Lu, Z.; Han, B. Brain wave recognition of words. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 14965-9.
108. Tseghai, G. B.; Malengier, B.; Fante, K. A.; Van Langenhove, L. Hook fabric electroencephalography electrode for brain activity measurement without shaving the head. Polymers 2023, 15, 3673.
109. Tian, Q.; Zhao, H.; Wang, X.; et al. Hairy-skin-adaptive viscoelastic dry electrodes for long-term electrophysiological monitoring. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2211236.
110. Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Wang, B.; et al. On-skin paintable biogel for long-term high-fidelity electroencephalogram recording. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabo1396.
111. Scalco De Vasconcelos, L.; Yan, Y.; Maharjan, P.; et al. On-scalp printing of personalized electroencephalography e-tattoos. Cell. Biomater. 2025, 1, 100004.
112. Mahmood, M.; Mzurikwao, D.; Kim, Y.; et al. Fully portable and wireless universal brain-machine interfaces enabled by flexible scalp electronics and deep learning algorithm. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019, 1, 412-22.
113. Shin, J. H.; Kwon, J.; Kim, J. U.; et al. Wearable EEG electronics for a Brain-AI Closed-Loop System to enhance autonomous machine decision-making. npj. Flex. Electron. 2022, 6, 32.
114. Liu, S.; Fawden, T.; Zhu, R.; Malliaras, G. G.; Bance, M. A data-efficient and easy-to-use lip language interface based on wearable motion capture and speech movement reconstruction. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eado9576.
115. Dong, P.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Grafstein, J. T.; Khan, I.; Yao, S. Decoding silent speech commands from articulatory movements through soft magnetic skin and machine learning. Mater. Horiz. 2023, 10, 5607-20.
116. MBIENTLAB. METAMOTIONS. https://mbientlab.com/metamotions/ (accessed 2026-06-16).
117. Srivastava, T.; Pan, S.; Nguyen, P.; Jain, S. Jawthenticate: microphone-free speech-based authentication using jaw motion and facial vibrations. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Istanbul, Turkiye, November 12-17, 2023; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp 209-22.
118. Graves, A.; Fernández, S.; Gomez, F.; Schmidhuber, J. Connectionist temporal classification. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, June 25-29, 2006; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp 369-76.
119. Wang, Y.; Lee, S.; Yokota, T.; et al. A durable nanomesh on-skin strain gauge for natural skin motion monitoring with minimum mechanical constraints. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabb7043.
120. Kim, T.; Shin, Y.; Kang, K.; et al. Ultrathin crystalline-silicon-based strain gauges with deep learning algorithms for silent speech interfaces. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5815.
121. Yoo, H.; Kim, E.; Chung, J. W.; et al. Silent speech recognition with strain sensors and deep learning analysis of directional facial muscle movement. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 54157-69.
122. Sun, T.; Tasnim, F.; Mcintosh, R. T.; et al. Decoding of facial strains via conformable piezoelectric interfaces. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020, 4, 954-72.
123. Yao, S.; Zhu, Y. Wearable multifunctional sensors using printed stretchable conductors made of silver nanowires. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 2345.
124. Yao, S.; Swetha, P.; Zhu, Y. Nanomaterial-enabled wearable sensors for healthcare. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2017, 7, 1700889.
125. Yao, S.; Vargas, L.; Hu, X.; Zhu, Y. A novel finger kinematic tracking method based on skin-like wearable strain sensors. IEEE. Sensors. J. 2018, 18, 3010-5.
126. Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bhuiyan, S. R. A.; Zhu, Y.; Yao, S. Printed strain sensors for on-skin electronics. Small. Struct. 2021, 3, 2100131.
127. Yao, S.; Lee, J. S.; James, K. E.; et al. Silver nanowire strain sensors for wearable body motion tracking. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Sensors, Busan, South Korea, November 1-4, 2015; IEEE, 2015.
128. Xu, S.; Yu, J. X.; Guo, H.; et al. Force-induced ion generation in zwitterionic hydrogels for a sensitive silent-speech sensor. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 219.
129. Jin, Y.; Wen, B.; Gu, Z.; et al. Deep-learning-enabled MXene-based artificial throat: toward sound detection and speech recognition. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2020, 5, 2000262.
130. Gong, S.; Zhang, X.; Nguyen, X. A.; et al. Hierarchically resistive skins as specific and multimetric on-throat wearable biosensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023, 18, 889-97.
131. Liu, T.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; et al. Machine learning-assisted wearable sensing systems for speech recognition and interaction. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2363.
132. Benster, T.; Wilson, G.; Elisha, R.; Willett, F. R.; Druckmann, S. A cross-modal approach to silent speech with LLM-enhanced recognition. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.05583. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05583 (accessed 16 June 2026).
133. Nguyen, C. H.; Karavas, G. K.; Artemiadis, P. Inferring imagined speech using EEG signals: a new approach using Riemannian manifold features. J. Neural. Eng. 2017, 15, 016002.
134. Lee, Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.; Lee, S. Towards voice reconstruction from EEG during imagined speech. AAAI 2023, 37, 6030-8.
135. Kamble, A.; Ghare, P. H.; Kumar, V.; Kothari, A.; Keskar, A. G. Spectral analysis of EEG signals for automatic imagined speech recognition. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 72, 1-9.
136. Kunimi, Y.; Ogata, M.; Hiraki, H.; Itagaki, M.; Kanazawa, S.; Mochimaru, M. E-MASK: a mask-shaped interface for silent speech interaction with flexible strain sensors. In Proceedings of Augmented Humans 2022, Kashiwa, Japan, March 13-15, 2022; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp 26-34.
137. Tang, C.; Xu, M.; Yi, W.; et al. Ultrasensitive textile strain sensors redefine wearable silent speech interfaces with high machine learning efficiency. npj. Flex. Electron. 2024, 8, 27.
138. Yin, J.; Wang, S.; Tat, T.; Chen, J. Motion artefact management for soft bioelectronics. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2024, 2, 541-58.
139. Tian, G.; Yang, D.; Liang, C.; et al. A nonswelling hydrogel with regenerable high wet tissue adhesion for bioelectronics. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2212302.
140. Yang, Q.; Hu, Z.; Rogers, J. A. Functional hydrogel interface materials for advanced bioelectronic devices. Acc. Mater. Res. 2021, 2, 1010-23.
141. Kim, J.; Oh, J.; Park, Y.; Kim, J. J.; Jeong, U. Soft conductive interfacing for bioelectrical uses: adhesion mechanisms and structural approaches. Macromolecules 2023, 56, 4431-46.
142. Park, B.; Shin, J. H.; Ok, J.; et al. Cuticular pad-inspired selective frequency damper for nearly dynamic noise-free bioelectronics. Science 2022, 376, 624-9.
143. Jeong, H. Lee, J.Y.; Lee, K.; et al. Differential cardiopulmonary monitoring system for artifact-canceled physiological tracking of athletes, workers, and COVID-19 patients. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg3092.
144. Wang, Y.; Yin, L.; Bai, Y.; et al. Electrically compensated, tattoo-like electrodes for epidermal electrophysiology at scale. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eabd0996.
145. Lin, C. F.; Zhu, J. D. Hilbert-Huang transformation-based time-frequency analysis methods in biomedical signal applications. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part. H. J. Eng. Med. 2012, 226, 208-16.
146. Challis, R. E.; Kitney, R. I. Biomedical signal processing (in four parts) Part 2 The frequency transforms and their inter-relationships. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 1991, 29, 1-17.
147. Xiong, D.; Zhang, D.; Zhao, X.; Zhao, Y. Deep learning for EMG-based human-machine interaction: a review. IEEE. CAA. J. Autom. Sinica. 2021, 8, 512-33.
148. Ding, S.; Saha, T.; Yin, L.; et al. A fingertip-wearable microgrid system for autonomous energy management and metabolic monitoring. Nat. Electron. 2024, 7, 788-99.
149. Ding, S.; Bian, Y.; Saha, T.; et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled wearable microgrids for self-sustained energy management. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2025, 2, 683-93.
150. Woo, S. T.; Ha, J. W.; Na, S.; Choi, H.; Pyun, S. B. Design and evaluation of Korean electropalatography (K-EPG). Sensors 2021, 21, 3802.
151. Stone, S. A silent-speech interface using electro-optical stomatography; TUD press, 2021. https://www.gbv.de/dms/tib-ub-hannover/1777588154.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
152. Pastore, G. Tongue position tracking device (TPTD): a discreet wireless electropalatography and glossometry device. University of Illinois at Chicago, 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/10027/23029 (accessed 2026-06-16).
153. icSpeech. Portable electropalatography (EPG) system. https://icspeech.com/electropalatography.html (accessed 2026-06-16).
154. Kelly, S.; Main, A.; Manley, G.; Mclean, C. Electropalatography and the Linguagraph system. Med. Eng. Phys. 2000, 22, 47-58.
155. Mat Zin, S.; Md Rasib, S. Z.; Suhaimi, F. M.; Mariatti, M. The technology of tongue and hard palate contact detection: a review. Biomed. Eng. Online. 2021, 20, 17.
156. Cleveland Clinic. Dental impressions. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/22671-dental-impressions (accessed 2026-06-16).
157. Jain, A. R.; Venkat Prasad, M. K.; Ariga, P. Palatogram revisited. Contemp. Clin. Dent. 2014, 5, 138-41.
158. Cao, B.; Sebkhi, N.; Mau, T.; Inan, O. T.; Wang, J. Permanent magnetic articulograph (PMA) vs. electromagnetic articulograph (EMA) in articulation-to-speech synthesis for silent speech interface. In Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 7, 2019; Association for Computational Linguistics: Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2019; pp 17-23.
159. Rebernik, T.; Jacobi, J.; Jonkers, R.; Noiray, A.; Wieling, M. A review of data collection practices using electromagnetic articulography. Lab. Phonol. 2021, 12, 6.
160. Marinelli, F.; Venegas, C.; Alarcón, J.; Navarro, P.; Fuentes, R. Chewing analysis by means of electromagnetic articulography: current developments and new possibilities. Sensors 2023, 23, 9511.
161. Gonzalez, J. A.; Cheah, L. A.; Gilbert, J. M.; et al. A silent speech system based on permanent magnet articulography and direct synthesis. Comput. Speech. Lang. 2016, 39, 67-87.
162. Gonzalez, J. A.; Cheah, L. A.; Gomez, A. M.; et al. Direct speech reconstruction from articulatory sensor data by machine learning. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2017, 25, 2362-74.
163. Kroos, C. Evaluation of the measurement precision in three-dimensional Electromagnetic Articulography (Carstens AG500). J. Phon. 2012, 40, 453-65.
164. Stella, M.; Bernardini, P.; Sigona, F.; Stella, A.; Grimaldi, M.; Gili Fivela, B. Numerical instabilities and three-dimensional electromagnetic articulography. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2012, 132, 3941-9.
165. Ferrat, K.; Guerti, M. An experimental study of the gemination in Arabic language. Arch. Acoust. 2017, 42, 571-8.
166. Carstens-Medizinelektronik-GmbH. Sensor Coil. https://www.articulograph.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/sensor_18.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
167. Yunusova, Y.; Green, J. R.; Mefferd, A. Accuracy assessment for AG500, Electromagnetic articulograph. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 2009, 52, 547-55.
168. Stella, M.; Stella, A.; Sigona, F.; Bernardini, P.; Grimaldi, M.; Fivela, B. G. Electromagnetic articulography with AG500 and AG501. In Proceedings of the Interspeech, Lyon, France, August 25-29, 2013; ISCA, 2013; pp 1316-20.
169. Chen, L.; Chen, P.; Tsai, R. T.; Tsao, Y. EPG2S: speech generation and speech enhancement based on electropalatography and audio signals using multimodal learning. IEEE. Signal. Process. Lett. 2022, 29, 2582-6.
170. Stone, S.; Birkholz, P. Cross-speaker silent-speech command word recognition using electro-optical stomatography. In Proceedings of ICASSP 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain, May 4-8, 2020; IEEE, 2020; pp 7849-53.
171. Sebkhi, N.; Santus, N.; Bhavsar, A.; Siahpoushan, S.; Inan, O. T. Evaluation of a wireless tongue tracking system on the identification of phoneme landmarks. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 68, 1190-7.
172. Chen, Y.; Hung, K.; Chuang, S.; et al. EMA2S: an end-to-end multimodal articulatory-to-speech system. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Daegu, Korea, May 22-28, 2021; IEEE, 2021; pp 1-5.
173. Cao, B.; Ravi, S.; Sebkhi, N.; et al. MagTrack: a wearable tongue motion tracking system for silent speech interfaces. J. Speech. Lang. Hear. Res. 2023, 66, 3206-21.
174. Hou, B.; Yang, D.; Ren, X.; Yi, L.; Liu, X. A tactile oral pad based on carbon nanotubes for multimodal haptic interaction. Nat. Electron. 2024, 7, 777-87.
175. Tang, J.; Lebel, A.; Jain, S.; Huth, A. G. Semantic reconstruction of continuous language from non-invasive brain recordings. Nat. Neurosci. 2023, 26, 858-66.
176. Leuthardt, E. C.; Schalk, G.; Roland, J.; Rouse, A.; Moran, D. W. Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology. Neurosurg. Focus. 2009, 27, E4.
177. Lago, N.; Cester, A. Flexible and organic neural interfaces: a review. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1292.
178. Duraivel, S.; Rahimpour, S.; Chiang, C.; et al. High-resolution neural recordings improve the accuracy of speech decoding. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6938.
179. Fattahi, P.; Yang, G.; Kim, G.; Abidian, M. R. A review of organic and inorganic biomaterials for neural interfaces. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1846-85.
180. Blackrock Neurotech. Utah Array. https://blackrockneurotech.com/products/utah-array/ (accessed 2026-06-16).
181. Hu, M.; Li, M.; Li, W.; Liang, H. Joint analysis of spikes and local field potentials using copula. Neuroimage 2016, 133, 457-67.
182. Kluin, K. J.; Gilman, S.; Markel, D. S.; Koeppe, R. A.; Rosenthal, G.; Junck, L. Speech disorders in olivopontocerebellar atrophy correlate with positron emission tomography findings. Ann. Neurol. 2004, 23, 547-54.
183. Cleveland Clinic. Dysarthria. https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/17653-dysarthria (accessed 2026-06-16).
184. Zhao, M.; Marino, M.; Samogin, J.; Swinnen, S. P.; Mantini, D. Hand, foot and lip representations in primary sensorimotor cortex: a high-density electroencephalography study. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19464.
185. Littlejohn, K. T.; Cho, C. J.; Liu, J. R.; et al. A streaming brain-to-voice neuroprosthesis to restore naturalistic communication. Nat. Neurosci. 2025, 28, 902-12.
186. Angrick, M.; Luo, S.; Rabbani, Q.; et al. Online speech synthesis using a chronically implanted brain-computer interface in an individual with ALS. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 9617.
187. Glasser, M. F.; Coalson, T. S.; Robinson, E. C.; et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature 2016, 536, 171-8.
188. Andrews, J. P.; Cahn, N.; Speidel, B. A.; et al. Dissociation of Broca’s area from Broca’s aphasia in patients undergoing neurosurgical resections. J. Neurosurg. 2023, 138, 847-57.
189. Liu, Y.; Xu, S.; Yang, Y.; et al. Nanomaterial-based microelectrode arrays for in vitro bidirectional brain-computer interfaces: a review. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2023, 9, 13.
190. Wandelt, S. K.; Bjånes, D. A.; Pejsa, K.; Lee, B.; Liu, C.; Andersen, R. A. Representation of internal speech by single neurons in human supramarginal gyrus. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2024, 8, 1136-49.
191. Wairagkar, M.; Card, N. S.; Singer-clark, T.; et al. An instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesis. Nature 2025, 644, 145-52.
192. Card, N. S.; Wairagkar, M.; Iacobacci, C.; et al. An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2024, 391, 609-18.
193. Cleveland Clinic. Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG). https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/17457-seeg-test (accessed 2026-06-16).
194. Kimura, N.; Hayashi, K.; Rekimoto, J. TieLent. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, Salerno, Italy, September 28-October 2, 2020; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2020, pp 1-8.
195. Jensen, M. A.; Fine, A.; Kerezoudis, P.; et al. Functional mapping of movement and speech using task-based electrophysiological changes in stereoelectroencephalography. J. Neurosurg. 2025, 142, 311-23.
196. Young, J. J.; Coulehan, K.; Fields, M. C.; et al. Language mapping using electrocorticography versus stereoelectroencephalography: a case series. Epilepsy. Behav. 2018, 84, 148-51.
197. Mullin, J. P.; Shriver, M.; Alomar, S.; et al. Is SEEG safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis of stereo-electroencephalography-related complications. Epilepsia 2016, 57, 386-401.
198. McGovern, R. A.; Ruggieri, P.; Bulacio, J.; Najm, I.; Bingaman, W. E.; Gonzalez-Martinez, J. A. Risk analysis of hemorrhage in stereo-electroencephalography procedures. Epilepsia 2019, 60, 571-80.
199. He, T.; Wei, M.; Wang, R.; et al. VocalMind: a stereotactic EEG dataset for vocalized, mimed, and imagined speech in tonal language. Sci. Data. 2025, 12, 657.
200. Ivucic, D.; Bayer, T.; Ivucic, G.; et al. Speech envelope reconstruction from stereo EEG in a speech production task. In 2025 47th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Copenhagen, Denmark, July 14-18, 2025; IEEE, 2025; pp 1-5.
201. Luo, S.; Angrick, M.; Coogan, C.; et al. Stable decoding from a speech BCI enables control for an individual with ALS without recalibration for 3 months. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, 2304853.
202. Angrick, M.; Herff, C.; Mugler, E.; et al. Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks. J. Neural. Eng. 2019, 16, 036019.
203. Wandelt, S. K.; Bjånes, D. A.; Pejsa, K.; Lee, B.; Liu, C.; Andersen, R. A. Online internal speech decoding from single neurons in a human participant. medRxiv 2022, 2022.11.02.22281775. Available online: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.11.02.22281775v1 (accessed 16 June 2026).
204. Wu, X.; Wellington, S.; Fu, Z.; Zhang, D. Speech decoding from stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) signals using advanced deep learning methods. J. Neural. Eng. 2024, 21, 036055.
205. Petrosyan, A.; Voskoboinikov, A.; Sukhinin, D.; et al. Speech decoding from a small set of spatially segregated minimally invasive intracranial EEG electrodes with a compact and interpretable neural network. J. Neural. Eng. 2022, 19, 066016.
206. Wilson, G. H.; Stavisky, S. D.; Willett, F. R.; et al. Decoding spoken English from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus. J. Neural. Eng. 2020, 17, 066007.
207. Wang, C.; Cai, M.; Hao, Z.; et al. Stretchable, multifunctional epidermal sensor patch for surface electromyography and strain measurements. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2021, 3, 2100031.
208. Liu, H.; Dong, W.; Li, Y.; et al. An epidermal sEMG tattoo-like patch as a new human-machine interface for patients with loss of voice. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 2020, 6, 16.
209. Stone, S.; Birkholz, P. Silent-speech command word recognition using electro-optical stomatography. In Interspeech 2016, 17th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, San Francisco, CA, USA, September 8-12, 2016; ISCA, 2016; pp 2350-1. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2016/stone16_interspeech.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
210. Bouten, C. V.; Koekkoek, K. T.; Verduin, M.; Kodde, R.; Janssen, J. D. A triaxial accelerometer and portable data processing unit for the assessment of daily physical activity. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1997, 44, 136-47.
211. Karantonis, D. M.; Narayanan, M. R.; Mathie, M.; Lovell, N. H.; Celler, B. G. Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE. Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2006, 10, 156-67.
212. Makin, J. G.; Moses, D. A.; Chang, E. F. Machine translation of cortical activity to text with an encoder-decoder framework. Nat. Neurosci. 2020, 23, 575-82.
213. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, X. Decoding silent speech based on high-density surface electromyogram using spatiotemporal neural network. IEEE. Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2023, 31, 2069-78.
214. Ang, K. K.; Chin, Z. Y.; Zhang, H.; Guan, C. Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP) in brain-computer interface. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Hong Kong, China, June 1-8, 2008; IEEE, 2008; pp 2390-7.
215. Delorme, A.; Makeig, S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2004, 134, 9-21.
216. Addison, P.; Walker, J.; Guido, R. Time--frequency analysis of biosignals. IEEE. Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2009, 28, 14-29.
217. Patro, S. G. K.; Sahu, K. K. Normalization: a preprocessing stage. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1503.06462. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.06462 (accessed 16 June 2026).
218. Santurkar, S.; Tsipras, D.; Ilyas, A.; Madry, A. How does batch normalization help optimization? In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montréal, Canada, December 3-8, 2018; Curran Associates Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2018; pp 2488-98.
219. Kim, T.; Kim, J.; Tae, Y.; Park, C.; Choi, J. H.; Choo, J. Reversible instance normalization for accurate time-series forecasting against distribution shift. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria, May 4-8, 2021; ICLR, 2021. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=cGDAkQo1C0p (accessed 2026-06-16).
220. Ba, J. L.; Kiros, J. R.; Hinton, G. E. Layer normalization. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1607.06450. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06450 (accessed 16 June 2026).
221. Ulyanov, D.; Vedaldi, A.; Lempitsky, V. Instance normalization: the missing ingredient for fast stylization. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1607.08022. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.08022 (accessed 16 June 2026).
222. Freitas, J.; Teixeira, A. Dias, M.S. Multimodal silent speech interface based on video, depth, surface electromyography and ultrasonic doppler: data collection and first recognition results. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech Production in Automatic Speech Recognition (SPASR-2013), Lyon, France, August 30, 2013; ISCA, 2013; pp 44-9. https://www.isca-archive.org/spasr_2013/freitas13_spasr.html (accessed 2026-06-16).
223. Leonard, M. K.; Gwilliams, L.; Sellers, K. K.; et al. Large-scale single-neuron speech sound encoding across the depth of human cortex. Nature 2023, 626, 593-602.
224. Senin, P. Dynamic time warping algorithm review. Information and Computer Science Department, University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu. 2008. https://csdl.ics.hawaii.edu/techreports/2008/08-04/08-04.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
225. Li, W.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, L.; Cui, J.; Wang, X.; Li, H. sEMG-based technology for silent voice recognition. Comput. Biol. Med. 2023, 152, 106336.
226. Janke, M.; Wand, M.; Schultz, T. A spectral mapping method for EMG-based recognition of silent speech. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Bio-inspired Human-Machine Interfaces and Healthcare Applications, Valencia, Spain, January 20-23, 2010; SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2010; pp 22-31.
227. Lu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Liu, W. Classification of EEG signal by STFT-CNN framework: identification of right-/left-hand motor imagination in BCI systems. In Proceedings of the The 7th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks, Shanghai, China, July 22-27, 2017; Sissa Medialab, 2017.
228. Burhan, N.; Kasno, M.; Ghazali, R. Feature extraction of surface electromyography (sEMG) and signal processing technique in wavelet transform: a review. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control and Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS), Selangor, Malaysia, October 22-22, 2016; IEEE, 2016, pp 141-6.
229. Abdul, Z. K.; Al-talabani, A. K. Mel frequency cepstral coefficient and its applications: a review. IEEE. Access. 2022, 10, 122136-58.
230. Yu, C.; Wang, X.; Qian, Z. Silent speech recognition using visual cascading fusion of tongue-lip movements based on pre-trained and fine-tuned model. J. Audio. Speech. Music. Proc. 2025, 2025, 16.
231. Chandrabanshi, V.; Domnic, S. Leveraging 3D-CNN and graph neural network with attention mechanism for visual speech recognition. SIViP. 2025, 19, 844.
232. Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, L.; et al. A novel silent speech recognition approach based on parallel inception convolutional neural network and Mel frequency spectral coefficient. Front. Neurorobot. 2022, 16, 971446.
233. Park, D. S.; Chan, W.; Zhang, Y.; et al. SpecAugment: a simple data augmentation method for automatic speech recognition. In Proceedings of the Interspeech 2019, Graz, Austria, September 15-19, 2019; ISCA, 2019; pp. 391-5.
234. Cao, B.; Teplansky, K.; Sebkhi, N.; Bhavsar, A. Inan, O.T.; Samlan, R.; Mau, T.; Wang, J. Data augmentation for end-to-end silent speech recognition for laryngectomees. In Proceedings of the Interspeech 2022, Incheon, Korea, September 18-22; ISCA, 2022; pp 3653-7.
235. Deng, Y.; Heaton, J. T.; Meltzner, G. S. Towards a practical silent speech recognition system. In Interspeech 2014, Singapore, September 14-18, 2014; ISCA, 2014; pp 1164-8.
236. Hahm, S.; Wang, J.; Friedman, J. Silent speech recognition from articulatory movements using deep neural network. In Proceedings of the ICPhS 2015 Proceedings, Glasgow, UK, August 10-14, 2015; IPA, 2015. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0524.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
237. Janke, M.; Wand, M.; Schultz, T. Impact of lack of acoustic feedback in EMG-based silent speech recognition. In Interspeech 2010, Chiba, Japan, September 26-30, 2010; ISCA, 2010; pp 2686-9.
238. Wand, M.; Janke, M.; Schultz, T. The EMG-UKA corpus for electromyographic speech processing. In Interspeech 2014, Singapore, September 14-18, 2014; ISCA, 2014; pp 1593-7.
239. Dietrich, M. The effects of stress reactivity on extralaryngeal muscle tension in vocally normal participants as a function of personality. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2009. https://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/concern/etds/96f5b541-089e-446d-9fdf-5dd673fef5b8 (accessed 2026-06-16).
240. Viterbi, A. Error bounds for convolutional codes and an asymptotically optimum decoding algorithm. IEEE. Trans. Inform. Theory. 1967, 13, 260-9.
241. Kimura, N.; Su, Z.; Saeki, T. End-to-end deep learning speech recognition model for silent speech challenge. In Proceedings of the Interspeech 2020, Shanghai, China, October 25-29, 2020; ISCA, 2020; pp 1025-6. https://www.isca-archive.org/interspeech_2020/kimura20_interspeech.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
242. Ferreira, D.; Silva, S.; Curado, F.; Teixeira, A. RaSSpeR: Radar-Based Silent Speech Recognition. In Interspeech 2021, Brno, Czechia, August 30-September 3, 2021; ISCA, 2021; pp 646-50.
243. Cai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, L.; et al. A facial electromyography activity detection method in silent speech recognition. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on High Performance Big Data and Intelligent Systems (HPBD&IS), Macau, China, December 5-7, 2021; IEEE, 2021; pp 246-51.
244. El-bialy, R.; Chen, D.; Fenghour, S.; et al. Developing phoneme-based lip-reading sentences system for silent speech recognition. CAAI. Trans. on. Intel. Tech. 2022, 8, 129-38.
245. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Chen, X.; Chen, X. Encoder-decoder architectures for silent speech recognition based on high-density surface electromyogram. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Mechatronics (ICARM), Guilin, China, July 9-11, 2022; IEEE, 2022; pp 760-3.
246. Vorontsova, D.; Menshikov, I.; Zubov, A.; et al. Silent EEG-speech recognition using convolutional and recurrent neural network with 85% accuracy of 9 words classification. Sensors 2021, 21, 6744.
247. Wang, X.; Su, Z.; Rekimoto, J.; Zhang, Y. Watch your mouth: silent speech recognition with depth sensing. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 11-16, 2024; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2024; pp 1-15.
248. Sun, X.; Xiong, J.; Feng, C.; et al. EarSSR: silent speech recognition via earphones. IEEE. Trans. on. Mobile. Comput. 2024, 23, 8493-507.
249. Amini Digehsara, P.; Possamai De Menezes, J. V.; Wagner, C.; et al. A user-friendly headset for radar-based silent speech recognition. In Proceedings of the Interspeech 2022, Incheon, Korea, September 18-22; ISCA, 2022; pp 4835-9.
250. Wagner, C.; Schaffer, P.; Amini Digehsara, P.; Bärhold, M.; Plettemeier, D.; Birkholz, P. Silent speech command word recognition using stepped frequency continuous wave radar. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4192.
251. Lee, K. Ultrasonic doppler based silent speech interface using perceptual distance. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 827.
252. Luo, J.; Wang, J.; Cheng, N.; Jiang, G.; Xiao, J. End-to-end silent speech recognition with acoustic sensing. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop, Shenzhen, China, January 19-22, 2021; IEEE, 2021; pp 606-12.
253. Yi, C.; Wei, B.; Zhu, J.; Rho, S.; Chen, Z.; Jiang, F. Mordo: silent command recognition through lightweight around-ear biosensors. IEEE. Internet. Things. J. 2023, 10, 763-73.
254. Yi, C.; Wei, B.; Zhu, J.; et al. Mordo2: a personalization framework for silent command recognition. IEEE. Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2024, 32, 133-43.
255. Zeng, S.; Wan, H.; Shi, S.; Wang, W. mSilent: towards general corpus silent speech recognition using COTS mmWave radar. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2023, 7, 1-28.
256. Yeo, J. H.; Kim, M.; Choi, J.; Kim, D. H.; Ro, Y. M. AKVSR: audio knowledge empowered visual speech recognition by compressing audio knowledge of a pretrained model. IEEE. Trans. Multimedia. 2024, 26, 6462-74.
257. Li, H.; Liang, Y.; Gao, H.; et al. Silent speech interface with vocal speaker assistance based on convolution-augmented transformer. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 72, 1-11.
258. Tóth, L.; Shandiz, A. H.; Gosztolya, G.; Gábor, C. T. Adaptation of tongue ultrasound-based silent speech interfaces using spatial transformer networks. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.19130. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.19130 (accessed 16 June 2026).
259. Li, H.; Lin, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Sequence-to-sequence voice reconstruction for silent speech in a tonal language. Brain. Sci. 2022, 12, 818.
260. Li, Z.; Ma, B.; Mao, W.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Z.; Lu, Y. SVIT-SSR: A sEMG-based vision transformer approach for silent speech recognition. Electron. Lett. 2024, 60, e13285.
261. Frey, S.; Spacone, G.; Cossettini, A.; et al. BioGAP-Ultra: a modular edge-AI platform for wearable multimodal biosignal acquisition and processing. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Circuits. Syst. 2026, 20, 399-415.
262. Xu, J.; Yu, J.; Hu, S.; Liu, X.; Meng, H. Mixed precision low-bit quantization of neural network language models for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2021, 29, 3679-93.
263. Spacone, G.; Frey, S.; Pollo, G.; et al. SilentWear: an ultra-low power wearable system for EMG-based silent speech recognition. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.02847. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.02847 (accessed 16 June 2026).
264. Ota, K. Data augmentation method based on three-dimensional measurement for silent speech recognition. Acoust. Sci. Technol. 2024, 45, 329-32.
265. Jin, Y.; Gao, Y.; Xu, X.; et al. EarCommand: "Hearing" your silent speech commands in ear. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2022, 6, 1-28.
266. Su, Z.; Fang, S.; Rekimoto, J. Multimodal silent speech-based text entry with word-initials conditioned LLM. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces, Waterloo, Canada, July 8-10, 2025; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2025; pp 1-14.
267. Shuzo, M.; Hiramoto, R.; Ishigaki, R.; Ando, S.; Sakai, M. Development of an EEG-based silent speech recognition model on the native arabic silent speech dataset using light BERT architecture. Int. J. Act. Behav. Comput. 2025, 2025, 1-16.
268. Benster, T.; Wilson, G.; Elisha, R.; Willett, F. R.; Druckmann, S. A cross-modal approach to silent speech with LLM-enhanced recognition. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.05583. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05583 (accessed 16 June 2026).
269. Cote-allard, U.; Gagnon-turcotte, G.; Phinyomark, A.; et al. A transferable adaptive domain adversarial neural network for virtual reality augmented EMG-based gesture recognition. IEEE. Trans. Neural. Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2021, 29, 546-55.
270. Cui, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; et al. A simplified adversarial architecture for cross-subject silent speech recognition using electromyography. J. Neural. Eng. 2024, 21, 056001.
271. Makhoul, J.; Kubala, F.; Schwartz, R.; Weischedel, R. Performance measures for information extraction. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the DARPA Broadcast News Workshop, Herndon, VA, February 28-March 3, 1999; Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, USA, 1999. https://ccc.inaoep.mx/~villasen/bib/slot%20error%20rate.pdf (accessed 2026-06-16).
272. Rix, A. W.; Beerends, J. G.; Hollier, M. P.; Hekstra, A. P. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ)-a new method for speech quality assessment of telephone networks and codecs. In 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, May 7-11, 2001; IEEE, 2001; pp 749-52.
273. Zheng, R. C.; Ai, Y.; Ling, Z. H. Incorporating ultrasound tongue images for audio-visual speech enhancement. IEEE/ACM. Trans. Audio. Speech. Lang. Process. 2024, 32, 1430-44.
274. Powers, D. M. W. Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.16061. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.16061 (accessed 16 June 2026).
275. Kubichek, R. Mel-cepstral distance measure for objective speech quality assessment. In Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications Computers and Signal Processing, Victoria, Canada, May 19-21, 1993; IEEE, 1993; pp 125-8.[DOI: 10.1109/PACRIM.1993.407206].
276. Qian, Y.; Liu, C.; Yu, P.; et al. Real-time decoding of full-spectrum Chinese using brain-computer interface. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadz9968.
277. Röddiger, T.; Küttner, M.; Lepold, P.; et al. OpenEarable 2.0: open-source earphone platform for physiological ear sensing. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2025, 9, 1-33.
278. Chang, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Liu, W. MetaEar: imperceptible acoustic side channel continuous authentication based on ERTF. Electronics 2022, 11, 3401.
279. Tan, J.; Wang, X.; Nguyen, C.; Shi, Y. SilentKey: a new authentication framework through ultrasonic-based lip reading. Proc. ACM. Interact. Mob. Wearable. Ubiquitous. Technol. 2018, 2, 1-18.
280. Yao, S.; Zhou, W.; Hinson, R.; et al. Ultrasoft porous 3D conductive dry electrodes for electrophysiological sensing and myoelectric control. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101637.
281. Sun, B.; Mccay, R. N.; Goswami, S.; et al. Gas-permeable, multifunctional on-skin electronics based on laser-induced porous graphene and sugar-templated elastomer sponges. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1804327.
282. Koelle, M.; Boll, S.; Olsson, T.; et al. (Un)Acceptable!?!: Re-thinking the social acceptability of emerging technologies. In Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, April 21-26, 2018; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp 1-8.
283. Yang, D.; Tian, G.; Chen, J.; et al. Neural electrodes for brain-computer interface system: from rigid to soft. BMEMat 2025, 3, e12130.
284. Wu, N.; Wan, S.; Su, S.; Huang, H.; Dou, G.; Sun, L. Electrode materials for brain-machine interface: a review. InfoMat 2021, 3, 1174-94.
285. Polikov, V.S.; Tresco, P.A.; Reichert, W. M. Response of brain tissue to chronically implanted neural electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2005, 148, 1-18.
286. Oxley, T. J.; Opie, N. L.; John, S. E.; et al. Minimally invasive endovascular stent-electrode array for high-fidelity, chronic recordings of cortical neural activity. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016, 34, 320-7.
287. Kacker, K.; Chetty, N.; Feldman, A. K.; et al. Motor activity in gamma and high gamma bands recorded with a Stentrode from the human motor cortex in two people with ALS. J. Neural. Eng. 2025, 22, 026036.
288. Zhou, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Xie, L.; Yin, E. AVE Speech Dataset: a comprehensive benchmark for multi-modal speech recognition integrating audio, visual, and electromyographic signals. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.16780. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.16780 (accessed 16 June 2026).
