REFERENCES
1. Pang, G.; Shen, C.; Cao, L.; Hengel, A. V. D. Deep learning for anomaly detection: a review. ACM. Comput. Surv. 2022, 54, 1-38.
2. Omar, S.; Ngadi, A.; Jebur, H. H. Machine learning techniques for anomaly detection: an overview. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2013, 79, 33-41.
3. Audibert, J.; Michiardi, P.; Guyard, F.; Marti, S.; Zuluaga, M. A. USAD: unsupervised anomaly detection on multivariate time series. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Min. Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. pp. 3395-404.
4. Singhal, A.; Seborg, D. E. Clustering multivariate time‐series data. J. Chemometrics. 2005, 19, 427-38.
5. Karim, S.; Rousanuzzaman, M.; Yunus, P. A.; Khan, P. H.; Asif, M. Implementation of K-means clustering for intrusion detection. Int. J. Sci. Res. Comput. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2019, 5, 1232-41.
6. Erfani, S. M.; Rajasegarar, S.; Karunasekera, S.; Leckie, C. High-dimensional and large-scale anomaly detection using a linear one-class SVM with deep learning. Pattern. Recognit. 2016, 58, 121-34.
7. Liu, F. T.; Ting, K. M.; Zhou, Z. H. Isolation forest. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy. Dec 15-19, 2008. IEEE; 2008. pp. 413-22.
8. Malhotra, P.; Ramakrishnan, A.; Anand, G.; Vig, L.; Agarwal, P.; Shroff, G. LSTM-based encoder-decoder for multi-sensor anomaly detection. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1607.00148. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.00148. (accessed 2026-09-21).
9. Zeng, F.; Chen, M.; Qian, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, W. Multivariate time series anomaly detection with adversarial transformer architecture in the Internet of Things. Future. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2023, 144, 244-55.
10. Nanduri, A.; Sherry, L. Anomaly detection in aircraft data using recurrent neural networks (RNN). In 2016 Integrated Communications Navigation and Surveillance (ICNS), Herndon, USA. Apr 19-21, 2016. IEEE; 2016. pp. 5C2-1-8.
11. Hwang, R.; Peng, M.; Huang, C.; Lin, P.; Nguyen, V. An unsupervised deep learning model for early network traffic anomaly detection. IEEE. Access. 2020, 8, 30387-99.
12. Dutta, V.; Pawlicki, M.; Kozik, R.; Choraś, M. Unsupervised network traffic anomaly detection with deep autoencoders. Log. J. IGPL. 2022, 30, 912-25.
13. Xu, W.; Jang-Jaccard, J.; Singh, A.; Wei, Y.; Sabrina, F. Improving performance of autoencoder-based network anomaly detection on NSL-KDD dataset. IEEE. Access. 2021, 9, 140136-46.
14. Said Elsayed, M.; Le-Khac, N. A.; Dev, S.; Jurcut, A. D. Network anomaly detection using LSTM based autoencoder. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Symposium on QoS and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks. Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. pp. 37-45.
15. Zare, F.; Mahmoudi-Nasr, P.; Yousefpour, R. A real-time network based anomaly detection in industrial control systems. Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 2024, 45, 100676.
16. Xu, J.; Wu, H.; Wang, J.; Long, M. Anomaly transformer: time series anomaly detection with association discrepancy. In ICLR 2022 Conference. 2022. https://openreview.net/forum?id=LzQQ89U1qm_. (accessed 2026-09-21).
17. Tuli, S.; Casale, G.; Jennings, N. R. TranAD: deep transformer networks for anomaly detection in multivariate time series data. Proc. VLDB. Endow. 2022, 15, 1201-14.
18. Zhang, W.; Zhang, C.; Tsung, F. GRELEN: multivariate time series anomaly detection from the perspective of graph relational learning. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-22). 2022. pp. 2390-7.
19. Zhou, Q.; Chen, J.; Liu, H.; He, S.; Meng, W. Detecting multivariate time series anomalies with zero known label. Proc. AAAI. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2023, 37, 4963-71.
20. Song, J.; Kim, K.; Oh, J.; Cho, S. MEMTO: memory-guided transformer for multivariate time series anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2023. pp. 57947-63.
21. Wang, C.; Zhuang, Z.; Qi, Q.; et al. Drift doesn’t matter: dynamic decomposition with diffusion reconstruction for unstable multivariate time series anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2023. pp. 10758-74.
22. Dai, Z.; He, L.; Yang, S. H.; Leeke, M. SARAD: spatial association-aware anomaly detection and diagnosis for multivariate time series. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2024. pp. 48371-410.
23. Huang, X.; Chen, W.; Hu, B.; Mao, Z. Graph mixture of experts and memory-augmented routers for multivariate time series anomaly detection. Proc. AAAI. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2025, 39, 17476-84.
24. Liu, S.; Kimura, T.; Liu, D.; et al. FOCAL: contrastive learning for multimodal time-series sensing signals in factorized orthogonal latent space. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc.; 2023. pp. 47309-38.
25. Ferrag, M. A.; Friha, O.; Hamouda, D.; Maglaras, L.; Janicke, H. Edge-IIoTset: a new comprehensive realistic cyber security dataset of IoT and IIoT applications for centralized and federated learning. IEEE. Access. 2022, 10, 40281-306.
26. Neto, E. C. P.; Dadkhah, S.; Ferreira, R.; Zohourian, A.; Lu, R.; Ghorbani, A. A. CICIoT2023: a real-time dataset and benchmark for large-scale attacks in IoT environment. Sensors 2023, 23, 5941.
27. Qathrady, M. A.; Ullah, S.; Alshehri, M. S.; et al. SACNN‐IDS: a self‐attention convolutional neural network for intrusion detection in industrial Internet of Things. CAAI. Trans. Intell. Technol. 2024, 9, 1398-411.
28. Li, X.; Li, S.; Zhang, G.; Xie, Y.; Wang, T.; Chu, F. A novel interpretable dynamic weighted domain adaptation network for cross-domain fault diagnosis of bearings under time-varying speeds. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2026, 170, 114173.
29. Griffin, J. M.; Doberti, A. J.; Hernández, V.; Miranda, N. A.; Vélez, M. A. Multiple classification of the force and acceleration signals extracted during multiple machine processes: part 1 intelligent classification from an anomaly perspective. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 93, 811-23.
30. Janssens, O.; Slavkovikj, V.; Vervisch, B.; et al. Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery. J. Sound. Vib. 2016, 377, 331-45.
31. Amruthnath, N.; Gupta, T. A research study on unsupervised machine learning algorithms for early fault detection in predictive maintenance. In 2018 5th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Singapore. Apr 26-28, 2018. IEEE; 2018. pp. 355-61.
32. Diez-Olivan, A.; Pagan, J. A.; Khoa, N. L. D.; Sanz, R.; Sierra, B. Kernel-based support vector machines for automated health status assessment in monitoring sensor data. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018, 95, 327-40.
33. Joshi, S. S.; Phoha, V. V. Investigating hidden Markov models capabilities in anomaly detection. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Southeast Conference. Association for Computing Machinery; 2005. pp. 98-103.
34. Nguyen, M. N.; Vien, N. A. Scalable and interpretable one-class SVMs with deep learning and random fourier features. In Berlingerio, M.; Bonchi, F.; Gärtner, T.; Hurley, N.; Ifrim, G.; eds. Machine learning and knowledge discovery in databases. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 157-72.
35. Xu, H.; Chen, W.; Zhao, N.; et al. Unsupervised anomaly detection via variational auto-encoder for seasonal KPIs in web applications. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee; 2018. pp. 187-96.
36. Lu, C.; Wang, Z.; Qin, W.; Ma, J. Fault diagnosis of rotary machinery components using a stacked denoising autoencoder-based health state identification. Signal. Process. 2017, 130, 377-88.
37. Zhang, C.; Song, D.; Chen, Y.; et al. A deep neural network for unsupervised anomaly detection and diagnosis in multivariate time series data. Proc. AAAI. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2019, 33, 1409-16.
38. Yin, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Xiong, N. N. Anomaly detection based on convolutional recurrent autoencoder for IoT time series. IEEE. Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. Syst. 2022, 52, 112-22.
39. Muneer, A.; Mohd Taib, S.; Mohamed Fati, S.; Balogun, A. O.; Abdul Aziz, I. A hybrid deep learning-based unsupervised anomaly detection in high dimensional data. Comput. Mater. Contin. 2022, 70, 5363-81.
40. Zheng, Y. Methodologies for cross-domain data fusion: an overview. IEEE. Trans. Big. Data. 2015, 1, 16-34.
41. Xiao, X.; Zheng, Y.; Luo, Q.; Xie, X. Inferring social ties between users with human location history. J. Ambient. Intell. Human. Comput. 2014, 5, 3-19.
42. Ngiam, J.; Khosla, A.; Kim, M.; Nam, J.; Lee, H.; Ng, A. Y. Multimodal deep learning. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning, Bellevue, USA. 2011. pp. 689-96. https://ai.stanford.edu/~jngiam/papers/NgiamKhoslaKimNamLeeNg2011.pdf. (accessed 2026-09-21).
43. Nagrani, A.; Yang, S.; Arnab, A.; Jansen, A.; Schmid, C.; Sun, C. Attention bottlenecks for multimodal fusion. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2107.00135. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.00135. (accessed 2026-09-21).
44. Yasaei, R.; Moghaddas, Y.; Al Faruque, M. A. IoT-GRAF: IoT graph learning-based anomaly and intrusion detection through multi-modal data fusion. In 2024 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Valencia, Spain. Mar 25-27, 2024. IEEE; 2024. p. 1-6.
45. Zhan, D.; Zhang, W.; Ye, L.; Yu, X.; Zhang, H.; He, Z. Anomaly detection in industrial control systems based on cross-domain representation learning. IEEE. Trans. Dependable. Secure. Comput. 2025, 22, 2505-18.
46. Sun, Y.; Qi, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, R. K-nearest neighbor temporal aggregate queries. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Extending Database Technology. 2015. pp. 493-504. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/k-nearest-neighbor-temporal-aggregate-queries/. (accessed 2026-09-21).
47. Canonico, R.; Esposito, G.; Navarro, A.; Romano, S. P.; Sperlì, G.; Vignali, A. Empowered cyber–physical systems security using both network and physical data. Comput. Secur. 2025, 152, 104382.
48. Pinto, A.; Herrera, L.; Donoso, Y.; Gutierrez, J. A. Cyber-physical anomaly detection a deep adversarial fusion of sensor and network data. Discov. Comput. 2026, 29, 10064.
49. Shafin, S. S.; Karmakar, G.; Mareels, I.; Balasubramanian, V.; Kolluri, R. R. Sensor self-declaration of numeric data reliability in Internet of Things. IEEE. Trans. Reliab. 2025, 74, 2751-65.
50. Veličković, P.; Cucurull, G.; Casanova, A.; Romero, A.; Liò, P.; Bengio, Y. Graph attention networks. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.10903. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.10903. (accessed 2026-09-21).
52. Ngo, G.; Beard, R.; Chandra, R. Evolutionary bagging for ensemble learning. Neurocomputing 2022, 510, 1-14.
53. Kadkhodaei, H. R.; Moghadam, A. M. E.; Dehghan, M. HBoost: a heterogeneous ensemble classifier based on the boosting method and entropy measurement. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2020, 157, 113482.
54. Zhang, H.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Dong, C. Multi-dimensional feature fusion and stacking ensemble mechanism for network intrusion detection. Future. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2021, 122, 130-43.
55. Kuncheva, L. I.; Whitaker, C. J. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Mach. Learn. 2003, 51, 181-207.
56. Booij, T. M.; Chiscop, I.; Meeuwissen, E.; Moustafa, N.; Hartog, F. T. H. D. ToN_IoT: the role of heterogeneity and the need for standardization of features and attack types in IoT network intrusion data sets. IEEE. Internet. Things. J. 2022, 9, 485-96.
57. Sokolova, M.; Lapalme, G. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Inf. Process. Manag. 2009, 45, 427-37.
58. Li, R.; Li, Y.; He, W.; Chen, L.; Luo, J. Multi-layer reconstruction errors autoencoding and density estimate for network anomaly detection. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2021, 128, 381-97.
59. Wu, Z.; Pan, S.; Long, G.; Jiang, J.; Chang, X.; Zhang, C. Connecting the dots: multivariate time series forecasting with graph neural networks. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery; 2020. pp. 753-63.
