REFERENCES

1. Stuttard, D.; Pinto, M. The web application hacker’s handbook: finding and exploiting security flaws. John Wiley & Sons; 2011. https://books.google.com/books?id=NSBHAAAAQBAJ. (accessed 2026-06-08).

2. Bhodia, N.; Prajapati, P.; Di Troia, F.; Stamp, M. Transfer learning for image-based malware classification. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.11551. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.11551. (accessed 2026-06-08).

3. Vu, D. L.; Nguyen, T. K.; Nguyen, T. V.; Nguyen, T. N.; Massacci, F.; Phung, P. H. A convolutional transformation network for malware classification. In 2019 6th NAFOSTED conference on information and computer science (NICS). Hanoi, Vietnam, Dec 12-13, 2019. IEEE; 2019. pp. 234-39.

4. Vasan, D.; Alazab, M.; Wassan, S.; Safaei, B.; Zheng, Q. Image-based malware classification using ensemble of CNN architectures (IMCEC). Comput. Secur. 2020, 92, 101748.

5. Kolosnjaji, B.; Zarras, A.; Webster, G.; Eckert, C. Deep learning for classification of malware system call sequences. In AI 2016: Advances in Artificial Intelligence: 29th Australasian Joint Conference. Hobart, Australia, December 5-8, 2016. Springer; 2016. pp. 137-49.

6. Wang, P.; Tang, Z.; Wang, J. A novel few-shot malware classification approach for unknown family recognition with multi-prototype modeling. Comput. Secur. 2021, 106, 102273.

7. Wang, J.; Lin, T.; Wu, H.; Wang, P. AGProto: adaptive graph ProtoNet towards sample adaption for few-shot malware classification. Electronics 2024, 13, 935.

8. Snell, J.; Swersky, K.; Zemel, R. Prototypical networks for few-shot learning. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1703.05175. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05175. (accessed 2026-06-08).

9. Vinayakumar, R.; Alazab, M.; Soman, K.; Poornachandran, P.; Venkatraman, S. Robust intelligent malware detection using deep learning. IEEE. Access. 2019, 7, 46717-38.

10. Raff, E.; Barker, J.; Sylvester, J.; Brandon, R.; Catanzaro, B.; Nicholas, C. Malware detection by eating a whole EXE. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.09435. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.09435. (accessed 2026-06-08).

11. Gibert, D.; Mateu, C.; Planes, J. A hierarchical convolutional neural network for malware classification. In 2019 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). Budapeest, Hungary, Jul 14-19, 2019. IEEE; 2019. pp. 1-8.

12. Raff, E.; Zak, R.; Cox, R.; et al. An investigation of byte n-gram features for malware classification. J. Comput. Virol. Hack. Tech. 2018, 14, 1-20.

13. Cui, Z.; Xue, F.; Cai, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, Gg.; et al. Detection of malicious code variants based on deep learning. IEEE. Trans. Ind. Inform. 2018, 14, 3187-96.

14. Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Wu, Y.; Zou, F. A novel image-based malware classification model using deep learning. In International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Springer; 2019. pp. 150-61.

15. Yuan, B.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Guo, W.; Wu, P.; Bao, X. Byte-level malware classification based on markov images and deep learning. Comput. Secur. 2020, 92, 101740.

16. Sharma, O.; Sharma, A.; Kalia, A. Windows and IoT malware visualization and classification with deep CNN and Xception CNN using Markov images. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 2023, 60, 349-75.

17. Azmoodeh, A.; Dehghantanha, A.; Choo, K. K. R. Robust malware detection for internet of (battlefield) things devices using deep eigenspace learning. IEEE. Trans. Sustain. Comput. 2019, 4, 88-95.

18. Zhu, H.; Gu, W.; Wang, L.; Xu, Z.; Sheng, V. S. Android malware detection based on multi-head squeeze-and-excitation residual network. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2023, 212, 118705.

19. Sasidharan, S. K.; Thomas, C. ProDroid - an Android malware detection framework based on profile hidden Markov model. Pervasive. Mob. Comput. 2021, 72, 101336.

20. Lee, Y. T.; Ban, T.; Wan, T. L.; et al. Cross platform IoT-malware family classification based on printable strings. In 2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom). Guangzhou, China, Dec 29 2020 - Jan 01 2021. IEEE; 2020. pp. 775-84.

21. Han, W.; Xue, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Kong, Z.; Mao, L. MalDAE: detecting and explaining malware based on correlation and fusion of static and dynamic characteristics. Comput. Secur. 2019, 83, 208-33.

22. Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Deng, R. H.; Xu, K. SDAC: a slow-aging solution for android malware detection using semantic distance based API clustering. IEEE. Trans. Dependable. Secure. Comput. 2022, 19, 1149-63.

23. Yan, S.; Ren, J.; Wang, W.; Sun, L.; Zhang, W.; Yu, Q. A survey of adversarial attack and defense methods for malware classification in cyber security. IEEE. Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2023, 25, 467-96.

24. Han, X.; Yu, X.; Pasquier, T.; et al. SIGL: Securing software installations through deep graph learning. In 30th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 21). USENIX Association; 2021. pp. 2345-62. https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity21/presentation/han-xueyuan. (accessed 2026-06-08).

25. Amer, E.; Zelinka, I.; El-Sappagh, S. A multi-perspective malware detection approach through behavioral fusion of API call sequence. Comput. Secur. 2021, 110, 102449.

26. Lin, K.; Xu, X.; Xiao, F. MFFusion: a multi-level features fusion model for malicious traffic detection based on deep learning. Comput. Netw. 2022, 202, 108658.

27. Almashhadani, A. O.; Carlin, D.; Kaiiali, M.; Sezer, S. MFMCNS: a multi-feature and multi-classifier network-based system for ransomworm detection. Comput. Secur. 2022, 121, 102860.

28. Wang, Q.; Hassan, W. U.; Li, D.; et al. You are what you do: hunting stealthy malware via data provenance analysis. In Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS) Symposium 2020. San Diego, USA, Feb 23-26, 2020. https://www.ndss-symposium.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/24167.pdf. (accessed 2026-06-08).

29. Damodaran, A.; Di Troia, F.; Visaggio, C. A.; Austin, T. H.; Stamp, M. A comparison of static, dynamic, and hybrid analysis for malware detection. J. Comput. Virol. Hack. Tech. 2017, 13, 1-12.

30. Gopinath, M.; Sethuraman, S. C. A comprehensive survey on deep learning based malware detection techniques. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2023, 47, 100529.

31. Huang, X.; Ma, L.; Yang, W.; Zhong, Y. A method for windows malware detection based on deep learning. J. Sign. Process. Syst. 2021, 93, 265-73.

32. Yoo, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Kang, B. B. AI-HydRa: advanced hybrid approach using random forest and deep learning for malware classification. Inform. Sci. 2021, 546, 420-35.

33. Nguyen, T. N.; Ngo, Q. D.; Nguyen, H. T.; Nguyen, G. L. An advanced computing approach for IoT-botnet detection in industrial Internet of Things. IEEE. Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 8298-306.

34. O’Shaughnessy, S.; Sheridan, S. Image-based malware classification hybrid framework based on space-filling curves. Comput. Secur. 2022, 116, 102660.

35. Kim, T.; Kang, B.; Rho, M.; Sezer, S.; Im, E. G. A multimodal deep learning method for android malware detection using various features. IEEE. Trans. Inf. Forensics. Secur. 2019, 14, 773-88.

36. Gibert, D.; Mateu, C.; Planes, J. HYDRA: a multimodal deep learning framework for malware classification. Comput. Secur. 2020, 95, 101873.

37. Dib, M.; Torabi, S.; Bou-Harb, E.; Assi, C. A multi-dimensional deep learning framework for iot malware classification and family attribution. IEEE. Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag. 2021, 18, 1165-77.

38. He, Y.; Lei, J.; Qin, Z.; Ren, K.; Chen, C. Combating concept drift with explanatory detection and adaptation for Android malware classification. In Proceedings of the 2025 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York, USA. Association for Computing Machinery; 2025. pp. 978-92.

39. Chai, Y.; Chen, X.; Qiu, J.; et al. MalFSCIL: a few-shot class-incremental learning approach for malware detection. IEEE. Trans. Inf. Forensics. Secur. 2025, 20, 2999-3014.

40. Miller, S. J.; Howard, J.; Adams, P.; Schwan, M.; Slater, R. Multi-modal classification using images and text. SMU Data Sci. Rev. 2020, 3, 6. https://scholar.smu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1165&context=datasciencereview. (accessed 2026-06-08).

41. Audebert, N.; Herold, C.; Slimani, K.; Vidal, C. Multimodal deep networks for text and image-based document classification. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: International Workshops of ECML PKDD 2019. Würzburg, Germany, Sep 16-20, 2019. Springer; 2020. pp. 427-43.

42. Antol, S.; Agrawal, A.; Lu, J.; et al. VQA: visual question answering. 2015. https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_iccv_2015/papers/Antol_VQA_Visual_Question_ICCV_2015_paper.pdf. (accessed 2026-06-08).

43. Xu, K.; Ba, J.; Kiros, R.; et al. Show, attend and tell: neural image caption generation with visual attention. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR. 2015. pp. 2048-57. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/xuc15.html. (accessed 2026-06-08).

44. Anderson, P.; He, X.; Buehler, C.; et al. Bottom-up and top-down attention for image captioning and visual question answering. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2018. pp. 6077-86.

45. Simonyan, K.; Zisserman, A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1409.1556. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1409.1556. (accessed 2026-06-08).

46. Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural. Comput. 1997, 9, 1735-80.

47. Yang, Z.; He, X.; Gao, J.; Deng, L.; Smola, A. Stacked attention networks for image question answering. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1511.02274. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.02274. (accessed 2026-06-08).

48. Kim, J. H.; Jun, J.; Zhang, B. T. Bilinear attention networks. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1805.07932. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1805.07932. (accessed 2026-06-08).

49. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; et al. Attention is all you need. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1706.03762. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762. (accessed 2026-06-08).

50. Devlin, J.; Chang, M. W.; Lee, K.; Toutanova, K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1810.04805. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805. (accessed 2026-06-08).

51. Nataraj, L.; Karthikeyan, S.; Jacob, G.; Manjunath, B. S. Malware images: visualization and automatic classification. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Visualization for Cyber Security. Association for Computing Machinery; 2011. p. 1-7.

52. Seok, S.; Kim, H. Visualized malware classification based-on convolutional neural network. J. Korea. Inst. Inf. Secur. Cryptol. 2016, 26, 197-208. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301236691_Visualized_Malware_Classification_Based-on_Convolutional_Neural_Network. (accessed 2026-06-08).

53. Hospedales, T.; Antoniou, A.; Micaelli, P.; Storkey, A. Meta-learning in neural networks: a survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2021, 44, 5149-69. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=9428530. (accessed 2026-06-08).

54. Song, Y.; Wang, T.; Mondal, S. K.; Sahoo, J. P. A comprehensive survey of few-shot learning: evolution, applications, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2205.06743. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.06743. (accessed 2026-06-08).

55. Vinyals, O.; Blundell, C.; Lillicrap, T.; Kavukcuoglu, K.; Wierstra, D. Matching networks for one shot learning. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1606.04080. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.04080. (accessed 2026-06-08).

56. Gao, T.; Han, X.; Liu, Z.; Sun, M. Hybrid attention-based prototypical networks for noisy few-shot relation classification. Proc. AAAI. Conf. Artif. Intell. 2019, 33, 6407-14.

57. Ndibanje, B.; Kim, K. H.; Kang, Y. J.; Kim, H. H.; Kim, T. Y.; Lee, H. J. Cross-method-based analysis and classification of malicious behavior by API calls extraction. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 239.

58. Belal, M. M.; Sundaram, D. M. Global-local attention-based butterfly vision transformer for visualization-based malware classification. IEEE. Access. 2023, 11, 69337-55.

59. Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Chintala, S.; et al. Automatic differentiation in PyTorch. In 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017). Long Beach, USA. 2017. https://openreview.net/pdf?id=BJJsrmfCZ. (accessed 2026-06-08).