REFERENCES
1. Kim J, Bhagwandin S, Labow DM. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:236.
3. Henley SJ, Larson TC, Wu M, et al. Mesothelioma incidence in 50 states and the district of Columbia, United States, 2003-2008. Int J Occup Environ Health 2013;19:1-10.
4. Moolgavkar SH, Meza R, Turim J. Pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in SEER: age effects and temporal trends, 1973-2005. Cancer Causes Control 2009;20:935-44.
5. Beasley MB, Galateau-Salle F, Dacic S. Pleural mesothelioma classification update. Virchows Arch 2021;478:59-72.
6. Gelvez-Zapata SM, Gaffney D, Scarci M, Coonar AS. What is the survival after surgery for localized malignant pleural mesothelioma? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013;16:533-7.
7. Marchevsky AM, Khoor A, Walts AE, et al. Localized malignant mesothelioma, an unusual and poorly characterized neoplasm of serosal origin: best current evidence from the literature and the International Mesothelioma Panel. Mod Pathol 2020;33:281-96.
8. Editorial Board WC of T. Thoracic tumours: WHO classification of tumours, 5th ed. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
9. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke A, Marx A, Nicholson AG. WHO classification of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart, 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2015.
10. Nicholson AG, Sauter JL, Nowak AK, et al. EURACAN/IASLC proposals for updating the histologic classification of pleural mesothelioma: towards a more multidisciplinary approach. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:29-49.
11. Husain AN, Colby TV, Ordóñez NG, et al. Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma 2017 update of the consensus statement from the international mesothelioma interest group. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:89-108.
12. Sauter JL, Dacic S, Galateau-Salle F, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the pleura: advances since the 2015 classification. J Thorac Oncol 2022;17:608-22.
13. Rosen LE, Karrison T, Ananthanarayanan V, et al. Nuclear grade and necrosis predict prognosis in malignant epithelioid pleural mesothelioma: a multi-institutional study. Mod Pathol 2018;31:598-606.
14. Kadota K, Suzuki K, Colovos C, et al. A nuclear grading system is a strong predictor of survival in epitheloid diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 2012;25:260-71.
15. Pelosi G, Papotti M, Righi L, et al. Pathologic grading of malignant pleural mesothelioma: an evidence-based proposal. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1750-61.
16. Klebe S, Brownlee NA, Mahar A, et al. Sarcomatoid mesothelioma: a clinical-pathologic correlation of 326 cases. Mod Pathol 2010;23:470-9.
17. Mansfield AS, Symanowski JT, Peikert T. Systematic review of response rates of sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesotheliomas in clinical trials. Lung Cancer 2014;86:133-6.
18. Galateau Salle F, Le Stang N, Tirode F, et al. Comprehensive molecular and pathologic evaluation of transitional mesothelioma assisted by deep learning approach: a multi-institutional study of the international mesothelioma panel from the MESOPATH reference center. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:1037-53.
19. Galateau Salle F, Le Stang N, Nicholson AG, et al. New insights on diagnostic reproducibility of biphasic mesotheliomas: a multi-institutional evaluation by the international mesothelioma panel from the MESOPATH reference center. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:1189-203.
20. Schulte JJ, Chapel DB, Attanoos R, et al. Comparison of nuclear grade, necrosis, and histologic subtype between biopsy and resection in pleural malignant mesothelioma: an international multi-institutional analysis. Am J Clin Pathol 2021;156:989-99.
21. Chirieac LR, Hung YP, Foo WC, et al. Diagnostic value of biopsy sampling in predicting histology in patients with diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer 2019;125:4164-71.
22. Vigneswaran WT, Kircheva DY, Ananthanarayanan V, et al. Amount of epithelioid differentiation is a predictor of survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:962-6.
23. Zhang YZ, Brambilla C, Molyneaux PL, et al. Presence of pleomorphic features but not growth patterns improves prognostic stratification of epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma by 2-tier nuclear grade. Histopathology 2020;77:423-36.
24. Zhang YZ, Brambilla C, Molyneaux PL, et al. Utility of nuclear grading system in epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma in biopsy-heavy setting: an external validation study of 563 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:347-56.
25. Fuchs TL, Chou A, Aksoy Y, et al. A critical assessment of current grading schemes for diffuse pleural mesothelioma with a proposal for a novel mesothelioma weighted grading scheme (MWGS). Am J Surg Pathol 2022;46:774-85.
26. Marchevsky AM, LeStang N, Hiroshima K, et al. The differential diagnosis between pleural sarcomatoid mesothelioma and spindle cell/pleomorphic (sarcomatoid) carcinomas of the lung: evidence-based guidelines from the International Mesothelioma Panel and the MESOPATH National Reference Center. Hum Pathol 2017;67:160-8.
27. Le Stang N, Burke L, Blaizot G, et al. Differential diagnosis of epithelioid malignant mesothelioma with lung and breast pleural metastasis: a systematic review compared with a standardized panel of antibodies-a new proposal that may influence pathologic practice. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020;144:446-56.
28. Chapel DB, Schulte JJ, Husain AN, Krausz T. Application of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis and management of malignant mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2020;9:S3-S27.
29. Ordóñez NG. The immunohistochemical diagnosis of mesothelioma: a comparative study of epithelioid mesothelioma and lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:1031-51.
30. Ordóñez NG. Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a review and update. Hum Pathol 2013;44:1-19.
31. Patel A, Borczuk AC, Siddiqui MT. Utility of claudin-4 versus BerEP4 and B72.3 in pleural fluids with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2020;9:146-51.
32. Vojtek M, Walsh MD, Papadimos DJ, Shield PW. Claudin-4 immunohistochemistry is a useful pan-carcinoma marker for serous effusion specimens. Cytopathology 2019;30:614-9.
33. Naso JR, Churg A. Claudin-4 shows superior specificity for mesothelioma vs non-small-cell lung carcinoma compared with MOC-31 and Ber-EP4. Hum Pathol 2020;100:10-4.
34. McGregor SM, Dunning R, Hyjek E, Vigneswaran W, Husain AN, Krausz T. BAP1 facilitates diagnostic objectivity, classification, and prognostication in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Hum Pathol 2015;46:1670-8.
35. Hakim SA, Abou Gabal HH. Diagnostic utility of BAP1, EZH2 and survivin in differentiating pleural epithelioid mesothelioma and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia: immunohistochemical study. Pathol Oncol Res 2021;27:600073.
36. Chapel DB, Hornick JL, Barlow J, Bueno R, Sholl LM. Clinical and molecular validation of BAP1, MTAP, P53, and Merlin immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 2022; doi: 10.1038/s41379-022-01081-z.
37. Dagogo-Jack I, Madison RW, Lennerz JK, et al. Molecular characterization of mesothelioma: impact of histologic type and site of origin on molecular landscape. JCO Precis Oncol 2022;6:e2100422.
38. Hung YP, Dong F, Torre M, Crum CP, Bueno R, Chirieac LR. Molecular characterization of diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Mod Pathol 2020;33:2269-79.
39. Marshall K, Jackson S, Jones J, et al. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A in malignant mesothelioma: diagnostic utility, patient characteristics and survival in a UK mesothelioma centre. Lung Cancer 2020;150:195-200.
40. Oyama Y, Hamasaki M, Matsumoto S, Sato A, Tsujimura T, Nabeshima K. Short 57 kb. CDKN2A ;22:813.
41. Nabeshima K, Hamasaki M, Kinoshita Y, Matsumoto S, Sa-Ngiamwibool P. Update of pathological diagnosis of pleural mesothelioma using genomic-based morphological techniques, for both histological and cytological investigations. Pathol Int 2022;72:389-401.
42. Chapel DB, Dubuc AM, Hornick JL, Sholl LM. Correlation of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) protein expression with MTAP and CDKN2A copy number in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Histopathology 2021;78:1032-42.
43. Illei PB, Rusch VW, Zakowski MF, Ladanyi M. Homozygous deletion of CDKN2A and codeletion of the methylthioadenosine phosphorylase gene in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:2108-13.
44. Brcic L, Le Stang N, Gallob F, et al. A combination of MTAP and p16 immunohistochemistry can substitute for CDKN2A fluorescence In situ hybridization in diagnosis and prognosis of pleural mesotheliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; doi: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0331-OA.
45. Hwang HC, Sheffield BS, Rodriguez S, et al. Utility of BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 (CDKN2A) fish in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion cytology specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 2016;40:120-6.
46. Berg KB, Dacic S, Miller C, Cheung S, Churg A. Utility of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase compared with BAP1 immunohistochemistry, and CDKN2A and NF2 fluorescence in situ hybridization in separating reactive mesothelial proliferations from epithelioid malignant mesotheliomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142:1549-53.
47. Kinoshita Y, Hida T, Hamasaki M, et al. A combination of MTAP and BAP1 immunohistochemistry in pleural effusion cytology for the diagnosis of mesothelioma. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:54-63.
48. Naso JR, Tessier-Cloutier B, Senz J, Huntsman DG, Churg A. Significance of p53 immunostaining in mesothelial proliferations and correlation with TP53 mutation status. Mod Pathol 2022;35:77-81.
49. Terra S, Roden AC, Yi ES, Aubry MC, Boland JM. Loss of methylthioadenosine phosphorylase by immunohistochemistry is common in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma and sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Am J Clin Pathol 2022;157:33-9.
50. Andrici J, Sheen A, Sioson L, et al. Loss of expression of BAP1 is a useful adjunct, which strongly supports the diagnosis of mesothelioma in effusion cytology. Mod Pathol 2015;28:1360-8.
51. Sheffield BS, Hwang HC, Lee AF, et al. BAP1 immunohistochemistry and p16 FISH to separate benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:977-82.
52. Soeberg MJ, Creighton N, Currow DC, Young JM, van Zandwijk N. Patterns in the incidence, mortality and survival of malignant pleural and peritoneal mesothelioma, New South Wales, 1972-2009. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016;40:255-62.
53. Pavlisko EN, Liu B, Green C, Sporn TA, Roggli VL. Malignant diffuse mesothelioma in women: a study of 354 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2020;44:293-304.
54. Thomas A, Chen Y, Yu T, Gill A, Prasad V. Distinctive clinical characteristics of malignant mesothelioma in young patients. Oncotarget 2015;6:16766-73.
55. Antman K, Shemin R, Ryan L, et al. Malignant mesothelioma: prognostic variables in a registry of 180 patients, the dana-farber cancer institute and brigham and women’s hospital experience over two decades, 1965-1985. J Clin Oncol 1988;6:147-53.
56. Le Stang N, Bouvier V, Glehen O, et al. Incidence and survival of peritoneal malignant mesothelioma between 1989 and 2015: A population-based study. Cancer Epidemiol 2019;60:106-11.
57. Chapel DB, Schulte JJ, Absenger G, et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: prognostic significance of clinical and pathologic parameters and validation of a nuclear-grading system in a multi-institutional series of 225 cases. Mod Pathol 2021;34:380-95.
58. Helm JH, Miura JT, Glenn JA, et al. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:1686-93.
59. Pavlisko EN, Roggli VL. Sarcomatoid peritoneal mesothelioma: clinicopathologic correlation of 13 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2015;39:1568-75.
60. Malpica A, Euscher ED, Marques-Piubelli ML, et al. Malignant mesothelioma of the peritoneum in women: a clinicopathologic study of 164 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 2021;45:45-58.
61. Whitaker D, Henderson DW, Shilkin KB. The concept of mesothelioma in situ: Implications for diagnosis and histogenesis. Semin Diagn Pathol 1992;9:151-61.
62. Dacic S, Roy S, Lyons MA, von der Thusen JH, Galateau-Salle F, Churg A. Whole exome sequencing reveals BAP1 somatic abnormalities in mesothelioma in situ. Lung Cancer 2020;149:1-4.
64. Fels Elliott DR, Travieso JL, As-Sanie S, et al. Progression of peritoneal mesothelioma in situ to invasive mesothelioma arising in the setting of endometriosis with germline BAP1 mutation: a case report. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2022;41:535-40.
65. Churg A, Dacic S, Galateau-Salle F, Attanoos R, de Perrot M. Malignant mesothelioma in situ: clinical and pathologic implications. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:899-901.
66. Churg A, Galateau-Salle F, Roden AC, et al. Malignant mesothelioma in situ: morphologic features and clinical outcome. Mod Pathol 2020;33:297-302.
67. Klebe S, Nakatani Y, Dobra K, et al. The concept of mesothelioma in situ, with consideration of its potential impact on cytology diagnosis. Pathology 2021;53:446-53.
