Download PDF
Systematic Review  |  Open Access  |  16 Jul 2018

Surgical treatment of stage IV gastric cancer: is it worthwhile?

Views: 6260 |  Downloads: 1204 |  Cited:  0
J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:33.
10.20517/2394-4722.2017.84 |  © The Author(s) 2018.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Abstract

Aim: To analyze clinical features and survival outcomes of patients with surgically-treated stage IV gastric cancer, in order to evaluate the suitability of surgery in these patients.

Methods: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase on October 9th, 2017. Survival outcomes data were collected.

Results: The original search returned 2434 papers. Thirty-nine studies were included in the final review, of which 26 evaluated liver metastasis resection, four pulmonary metastasis resections and nine palliative gastrectomies. In total 933 patients underwent hepatectomy for liver metastasis from gastric cancer and median survival rates were 73%, 37% and 27% at 1-, 3- and 5-year respectively, with a median overall survival of 22 months (9-52 months). Data regarding resection of lung metastases were scarce and extremely heterogeneous. In total 1115 patients underwent palliative gastrectomy and median overall survival of patients was 12 months (8-53 months). In the only randomized controlled trial, no survival benefit of additional gastrectomy over chemotherapy alone was found, in contrast with the retrospective studies.

Conclusion: Survival benefit of surgery in advanced gastric cancer is still unclear. Surgery may play an important role in highly selected patients. However, further randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify the actual impact of surgery in these patients.

Keywords

Gastric cancer, metastasis, surgical treatment

Introduction

Gastric carcinoma is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide[1]. The 5-year survival for patients with gastric cancer is 30.6%. This decreases to 5.2% in patients with distant metastases, who comprise 35% of total patients with a diagnosis of gastric cancer[2,3]. Liver metastases occur in 4%-14% of cases, while around 15% of patients develop pulmonary metastases[4,5]. Approximately 70% of patients are considered ineligible for surgical treatment with curative intent at the time of presentation, due to the presence of locally advanced disease or distant metastases[2]. In addition, recurrence occurs in 30%-50% of cases, even after curative R0 resection, mainly in the first two years after gastrectomy[6,7].

In this setting, neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers new perspectives in controlling systemic disease and down-staging locally advanced gastric cancer prior to surgery[8]. Moreover, several studies have reported promising outcomes of surgical resection in patients with advanced gastric cancer with hepatic or pulmonary metastases. However, the current guidelines are not consistent regarding the most appropriate treatment strategy. The Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines[9,10] do not recommend surgery with curative intent in these patients, leading most patients with metastatic gastric cancer to receive palliative treatment. By contrast, the Guidelines Committee of the JGCA recently reconsidered the treatment of potentially resectable M1 disease in highly selected patients[9,11]. The definition of "stage IV" gastric cancer has varied greatly over the last few years; the 7th and 8th versions[12,13] of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) 2010 tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system clearly defined stage IV as any lesion with hematogenous metastases (M1), while previous versions[14] have also included "locally advanced" cases, such as lesions with massive (> 15) lymph node metastases (N3) or with direct invasion of adjacent structures (T4). The Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer did not classify pancreatic head (station 13 and 17) and para-aortic (station 16) lymph node metastases as "distant" (M1) up until the 3rd English Edition in 2011[15], whereas western staging systems had accepted this concept long before[14]. Which patients with stage IV gastric cancer (either locally advanced or with M1) should be offered a surgical resection and the exact survival benefit of this remain unclear.

This study sought to systematically review the literature in order to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment for stage IV gastric cancer and to provide an update on the surgical treatment strategies for this condition.

Methods

A systematic literature search was carried out on October 9th, 2017. All references from 2002 to 2017 were potentially eligible for inclusion in the study. The following search strategy was used in PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase: ((((((((((“gastric cancer”) OR “gastric carcinoma”) OR “gastric neoplasm”) OR “stomach cancer”) OR “stomach carcinoma”) OR “stomach neoplasm”)) AND ((“metastatic”) OR metastas*)) AND ((((“liver”) OR “hepatic”) OR “lung”) OR “pulmonary”)) AND (((((“surgery”) OR “resection”) OR “palliative surgery”) OR “palliative gastrectomy”) OR “surgical”)).

A title search was conducted with title review of all identified references. Studies deemed unrelated to study aims were excluded. Abstracts for the remaining studies were retrieved and screened for relevance. Full papers were retrieved for all abstracts deemed potentially eligible. Full papers underwent authors’ review and assessment of inclusion/exclusion criteria. Any disagreement during the search and selection process was resolved by consensus.

Inclusion criteria

• Papers presenting data regarding liver and pulmonary metastasis resection in patients with gastric cancer, without evidence of peritoneal metastases or metastases to other organs.

• Papers presenting data on patients undergoing palliative gastrectomy, defined as gastric resection without radical intent (microscopic or macroscopic residual disease) in patients with locally advanced disease or in patients with distant metastases.

• Original data (no review papers).

• Survival outcomes data available for at least 1year following surgical resection. Papers relating to hepatic metastases must have reported at least the median survival time.

• Patient recruitment after 1980.

Exclusion criteria

• Non-English language studies.

• Full manuscript not available (e.g., abstracts presented at conferences).

• Studies with less than ten patients.

• Malignancy other than epithelial carcinoma[16,17].

The following data were collected: author details, country, recruitment period, study design, median follow-up, sample size, gender, positive and negative findings, and methodological quality. The primary outcome assessed was survival following surgical resection.

Considering the extreme heterogeneity of inclusion criteria of each paper, we aimed to review the literature descriptively without an intent of inference.

Results

The original search returned 2434 papers. Figure 1 shows the study search strategy. Overall, 39 studies were included in the final review (26 for hepatic resection[18-43], 4 for pulmonary resection[44-47] and 9 for palliative gastrectomy[48-55]).

Surgical treatment of stage IV gastric cancer: is it worthwhile?

Figure 1. Diagram showing literature selection strategy

Liver metastasis surgical treatment

The 26 studies included provided data on 933 patients who underwent gastrectomy and synchronous or metachronous hepatectomy. The median sample size was 24 patients (range 11-256). Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1. The median age of patients undergoing hepatectomy was 64 years (range 57-72 years) and 78% of patients were males. There was a wide variety of disease burden in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Hepatic lesions were solitary and unilobar in 65% and 78% respectively. Fifty five percent of patients developed synchronous metastases, while 45% developed metachronous lesions. The majority of hepatectomies were minor resections for limited disease, although 42% of patients underwent major resections.

Table 1

Basic characteristics of studies regarding hepatectomy for hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer

StudyAreaYear of publicationRecruitment periodMedian follow-up (months)Sample (n)Median age (years)Mean age (years)M/F
(n)
Solitary/multiple (n)Unilobular/bilobar (n)Synchronous/metachronous (n)Hepatectomy (minor/
major) (n)
Hepatectomy (minor/major) (%)Neo/
adjuvant
therapy (n)
Neo/
adjuvant therapy (%)
Baek
et al.[18]
South Korea20132003-20101312NR6111/111/111/13/98/467/330/60/50
Chen
et al.[19]
China20132007-2012NR20NR5712/88/1211/920/06/1430/7020/20100/100
Cheon
et al.[20]
South Korea20081995-2005NR4160NR34/728/13NR/NR30/1129/371/70/37NR/88
Dittmar
et al.[21]
Germany20121995-2009NR1557NR12/38/712/39/67/353/20NR/NRNR/NR
Garancini
et al.[22]
Italy20121998-2007202164NR14/712/916/512/917/481/19NR/NRNR/NR
Kinoshita
et al.[23]
Japan20141990-20106525664NR207/49NR/NRNR/NR106/15073/18329/7145/8418/33
Koga
et al.[24]
Japan20071985-2005NR42NRNRNR29/13NR/NR20/2235/783/160/14NR/31
Komeda
et al.[25]
Japan20142000-2012NR2469NR21/317/7NR/NR1/2310/1442/5811/1546/63
Li et al.[26]Taiwan20171996-20122934NR6223/11NR/NRNR/NR0/34NR/NRNR/NRNR/NRNR
Liu et al.[27]China20121995-20103835NRNR29/612/2312/2335/0NR/NRNR/NRNR/NRNR/NR
Makino
et al.[28]
Japan20101992-2007NR16NRNR13/39/711/59/716/0100/05/1319/88
Miki et al.[29]Japan20121995-2009NR2572NR23/218/720/516/9NR/NRNR/NR0/00/0
Morise
et al.[30]
Japan20081989-2004NR1864NR16/214/415/311/714/478/22NR/NRNR/NR
Nomura
et al.[31]
Japan20091991-20052017NR6613/4NR/NRNR/NR9/814/382/183/1018/59
Qiu et al.[32]China20131998-20093825NRNR22/316/921/4NR/NRNR/NRNR/NR4/1416/60
Roh et al.[33]South Korea20051988-1996191161NR10/111/011/08/310/191/9NR/NRNR/NR
Sakamoto
et al.[34]
Japan20031985-2001172263NR13/1116/617/512/1019/386/140/80/40
Sakamoto
et al.[35]
Japan20071990-2005NR3764NR29/821/1630/716/2132/586/140/60/16
Takemura
et al.[36]
Japan20121993-2011276465NR49/1537/27NR/NR34/3050/1478/2218/2628/41
Thelen
et al.[37]
Germany20081988-200292464NR17/713/1118/615/916/867/33NR/NRNR/NR
Tiberio
et al.[38]
Italy20151997-2011NR53NRNRNRNR/NRNR/NR53/038/1472/260/220/42
Tsujimoto
et al.[39]
Japan20101980-20072917NR6616/113/417/09/8NR/NRNR/NR0/140/82
Viganò
et al.[40]
Italy20131997-2008432061NR12/815/518/29/1111/955/458/NR40/NR
Wang
et al.[41]
China20122003-2008NR3060NR27/322/827/3NR/NR23/777/230/300/100
Wang
et al.[42]
China20141996-20081439NR6426/1331/834/539/0NR/NRNR/NR0/390/100
Zacherl
et al.[43]
Austria20021980-1999NR1562NR10/58/7NR/NR10/512/373/200/2NR/14

Details on chemotherapy used were also reported in 19 studies, including data on 775 patients. Of these, 15% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. A wide variety of chemotherapy regimens were described, while seven studies did not state what chemotherapeutic agents their patients received[18,23,24,29,34,39,41].

Survival outcomes are summarized in Table 2. Median follow-up was 24 months (range 9-65 months). Twenty-one studies presented 1-year survival rates ranging from 36% to 96%, 19 presented 3-year survival rates ranging from 14% to 70% and 25 studies presented 5-year survival rates of between 9% to 42%. Median survival rates were 73%, 37% and 27% at 1-, 3- and 5-year respectively. Median overall survival was 22 months (range 9-52 months).

Table 2

Survival outcomes following hepatectomy for liver metastasis from gastric cancer, with a comparison with nonresected patients (chemotherapy alone)

Study1-year survival (%)3-year survival (%)5-year survival (%)Median survival (months)Nonresected patients,
median OS
(months)
P value
Baek et al.[18]65NR3931--
Chen et al.[19]NRNR15225.50.000
Cheon et al.[20]75322117NR0.0001
Dittmar et al.[21]NRNR274890.002
Garancini et al.[22]68311911--
Kinoshita et al.[23]77423131--
Koga et al.[24]76484234--
Komeda et al.[25]78404022--
Li et al.[26]743725263.130.001
Liu et al.[27]5822NR15--
Makino et al.[28]88564238150.001
Miki et al.[29]74433733NR0.04
Morise et al.[30]56272713--
Nomura et al.[31]NRNR3121--
Qiu et al.[32]96702938--
Roh et al.[33]73NR2719--
Sakamoto et al.[34]73383821--
Sakamoto et al.[35]NRNR1131--
Takemura et al.[36]84503734--
Thelen et al.[37]3816109--
Tiberio et al.[38]5014913--
Tsujimoto et al.[39]NRNR3234--
Viganò et al.[40]95633352--
Wang et al.[41]43171711--
Wang et al.[42]56181014NRNR
(but referred
< 0.05)
Zacherl et al.[43]3629149--

Seven of the 26 studies compared survival outcomes between resected patients and those who underwent chemotherapy alone. Surgery demonstrated a survival advantage in all of them.

Pulmonary metastasis surgical treatment

Eighty-three patients provided by four studies underwent resection of pulmonary metastases from gastric cancers. Resection of gastric cancer lung metastases has rarely been reported and few data are available regarding short- and long-term outcomes of this procedure. The majority of patients with pulmonary metastases from gastric cancer present with carcinomatous lymphangitis or pleuritis, whereas nodular lesions are less common[56].

Baseline characteristics are described in Table 3 and Supplementary Table 2. Median age was 66 years (range 56-68 years), and males represented the majority of resected patients (83% vs. 17%). All patients underwent gastrectomy and subsequent pulmonary metastasectomy. Hundred percent of included patients displayed metachronous metastases and 73% of these were solitary lesions. Overall 39% of patients underwent lobectomy, while wedge resection or segmentectomy was performed in 61%. In 3 studies[45-47], indications for performing surgery were decided based on Thomford’s criteria[57]. Shiono et al.[44] did not specify the criteria for surgical resection. Details on chemotherapy were reported in 3 studies. No patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while adjuvant treatment was carried out in 42% of patients.

Table 3

Demographics and survival data from the cited lung resection studies for metastatic gastric cancer

StudyCountryYear of publicationRecruitment periodMedian follow-up (months)Sample (n)Mean age (years)M/F
(n)
Neoadj/adjuvant therapy (n)1-year survival (%)3-year survival (%)5-year survival (%)Median survival
(months)
Nonresected patients, median OS (months)P value
Iijima
et al.[46]
Japan20161985-201227106410/0NRNR30NR27--
Kobayashi
et al.[47]
Japan20121998-201223125610/20/10NRNR58.4067--
Shiono
et al.[44]
Japan20131980-201118516840/11NR/18NRNR2829--
Yoshida
et al.[45]
Japan20142003-20122710679/10/3100100NRNR--

Median follow-up was 25 months (range 18-27 months). Overall survival outcomes are summarized in Table 3. Iijima et al.[46] reported an overall 3-year survival rate of 30%. Kobayashi et al.[47] showed a median survival time following pulmonary resection of 67 months and an overall 5-year survival rate of 59%, while Shiono et al.[44] reported a value of 28%. By contrast, Yoshida et al.[45] followed patients for a median time of 27 months and the overall survival rates at 1, 3 and 4 years were 100%, 100%, and 75%, respectively. None of the included studies reported data regarding palliative treatment arms involving chemotherapy alone.

Palliative gastrectomy

Nine studies providing data on 1115 patients who underwent palliative gastric resection were included [Table 4]. One of these was a randomized controlled trial (REGATTA)[58]. The median sample size was 137 patients (range 23-218), and 68% of patients were males. Except for the randomized controlled trial, inclusion criteria and study structure were very heterogeneous between series and, consequently a comparison of results between them was challenging. In addition, in these retrospective studies, the indications for palliative gastrectomy were judged individually by surgeons based on patients’ general health, performance status, symptoms, extent of disease, and feasibility of resection.

Table 4

Demographics and survival data of patients undergoing palliative gastrectomy, with a comparison with nonresected patients

StudyCountryYear of publicationRecruitment periodMedian
follow-up
(months)
Sample (n)Mean
age
(years)
M/F
(n)
Gastrectomy total/subtotalNeo/adjuvant therapy1-year survival (%)3-year survival (%)5-year survival (%)Median survival
(months)
Nonresected patients, median OS
(months)
P value
Li et al.[48]China20101992-2002NR1375876/6121/116NR/NRNRNRNR1270.001
Ko et al.[49]South Korea20121992-2007NR17858122/5663/1150/120NRNRNR12--
Hartgrink
et al.[50]
The Netherlands20021989-1993NR156NRNR63/93NRNRNRNR850.001
Saidi
et al.[51]
USA20061990-2000NR245714/104/10NR/12NRNR51360.006
Kokkola
et al.[52]
Finland20122000-2009NR2361NR11/12NR/15NRNRNR1160.152
Samarasam et al.[53]India20061999-2003NR107NRNR39/68NR/107NRNRNR24120.003
Lin et al.[54]China20081994-2001NR18360143/40NRNR/11280.320.86NR--
Sougioultzis et al.[55]Greece20111997-2007NR218NRNRNRNR/218NRNRNR53160.001
Fujitani
et al.[58]
Japan/
South Korea/
Singapore
20162008-2013NR89NR61/2857/320/89NRNRNR 14160.070
(one-side)

The minority of palliative resections were total gastrectomies, while 62% of patients underwent minor resection. Data regarding adjuvant treatment were reported in 7 of the 9 studies, and overall 71% of patients underwent post-operative chemotherapy; only one study reported data about neoadjuvant treatment[49]. Median overall survival was 12 months (range 8-53 months). In 6 of the 8 retrospective studies, a comparison with nonresected patients was carried out, and gastrectomy showed a significant survival advantage in 5 of them; however, these results had limitations related to the retrospective nature and the selection bias for surgery. In fact, in the REGATTA trial, the median overall survival was 16.6 months for patients assigned to chemotherapy alone and 14.3 months for those assigned to gastrectomy plus chemotherapy, in whom significantly higher rates of adverse events were also seen.

Discussion

The most appropriate treatment in cases of stage IV gastric cancer is still debated. Indications and advantages of a surgical approach to treat advanced gastric neoplasms in comparison to conservative therapy such as chemotherapy have not yet been established. Gastric cancers are mostly of advanced stage at diagnosis. However, location and number of metastases, as well as patient characteristics, influence the benefit of surgical treatment and overall survival outcomes. This systematic review showed that surgery seems to play an important role even in patients with incurable gastric cancer.

In our study, surgical resection of gastric cancer with hepatic metastasis in the absence of peritoneal disease is associated with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 73%, 37%, and 27% respectively. Median overall survival was 22 months (range 9-52 months). Compared to the results of randomized controlled trials based on chemotherapy, hepatectomy seems to offer in selected patients better survival outcomes[59,60]. Liao et al.[61], consistent with previous reviews, described significantly improved overall survival in patients treated with hepatectomy compared to palliative chemotherapy. In light of these studies, the Japanese guidelines reconsidered the role of hepatectomy in the treatment of liver metastasis in gastric cancer, however, which patients may actually benefit from surgical treatment is still controversial. Medical comorbidities of patients undergoing hepatectomy were poorly described in the included studies, as were other confounders like metastasic features, use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, and surgical techniques. With regard to surgical approach, minor hepatectomy was performed more commonly than major resection (58% vs. 42%). Synchronous, multiple, or bilobar metastases were associated in some studies with poorer prognosis, but were not necessarily considered contraindications for surgery[24,28,35]. Chemotherapy was commonly used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. However, there was a wide variation in timing and regimens between studies. Therefore, from the current literature, the indications for a surgical approach to gastric cancer metastatic to the liver, in particular, the threshold for number of metastases and their location and the administration of chemotherapy in relation to surgery, remain undetermined.

Resection of lung metastases from gastric cancer has rarely been reported, and only small amounts of heterogeneous data are available regarding short- and long-term outcomes. The majority of articles present in the literature are case reports or small series. Only four studies were included in our evaluation. They reported favorable results in the surgical group; however, the series were small, and comparison between studies was difficult because of the heterogeneity of inclusion criteria for each study. Overall 3-year survival rates ranged from 30% to 100%. The frequent occurrence of extrapulmonary metastases before pulmonary metastasectomy restricts surgical treatment to highly selected patients[56]. In this setting, lung metastasectomy seems not to have a determined role in the standard management of these patients.

In the 1115 patients included in this review who underwent palliative gastrectomy, median overall post-resection survival was 12 months. The rationale for non-curative gastrectomy was the reduction of tumor burden and/or the palliation of symptoms, such as obstruction, perforation, bleeding or ascites. In 6 of the 8 retrospective studies included in this review, overall survival of resected patients was significantly better than the nonresected group. However, all studies highlighted as a limitation, the possible relationship between these positive results and the selection bias of patients. A previous meta-analysis was consistent with these results[62]. Moreover, they analyzed survival rates of patients that received palliative gastrectomy with or without chemotherapy, and it was shown that surgery combined with chemotherapy offered a survival benefit[62]. By contrast, the results of the REGATTA trial showed no survival benefit of additional gastrectomy over chemotherapy alone, not justifying gastric resection in patients with metastatic gastric cancer[58]. In light of this randomized controlled trial, chemotherapy alone remains the standard of care for these patients, even though the chemotherapy regimen used in the REGATTA trial was based on S-1, which shows reduced tolerability in Western patients[63].

In summary, from the present literature, a surgical approach for stage IV gastric cancer shows uncertain survival benefits and is not justified in all patients. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify the actual impact of surgery in these patients. Probably, surgery may play an important role in highly selected patients. Criteria to select patients who can benefit more from surgical treatment have not yet been identified, and this needs further investigation.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Robin Vasan from Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School for language editing.

Authors’ contributions

Concept, design, definition of intellectual content: Pergolini I, Ciano P, Guercioni G, Catarci M

Literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, statistical analysis: Pergolini I, Ciano P

Manuscript preparation: Pergolini I, Catarci M

Manuscript editing, manuscript review: Pergolini I, Ciano P, Guercioni G, Catarci M

Availability of data and materials

Data are searched and available from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase.

Financial support and sponsorship

None.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018.

REFERENCES

1. Blot WJ, Devesa SS, Kneller RW FJJ. Rising incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia. JAMA 1991;265:1287-9.

2. Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:7-30.

3. National Cancer Institute - Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER*Stat Databases: November 2015 Submission. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/data/seerstat/nov2015/. [Last accessed on 27 Feb 2018].

4. Shin A, Kim J, Park S. Gastric cancer epidemiology in Korea. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:135-40.

5. Kemp CD, Kitano M, Kerkar S, Ripley RT, Marquardt JU, Schrump DS, Avital I. Pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1796-805.

6. Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Squires MH, Poultsides GA, Fields RC, Schmidt C, Weber SM, Votanopoulos K, Maithel SK, Pawlik TM. Rates and patterns of recurrence after curative intent resection for gastric cancer: a United States multi-institutional analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2014;219:664-75.

7. Deng J, Liang H, Wang D, Sun D, Pan Y, Liu Y. Investigation of the recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection. Surg Today 2011;41:210-5.

8. Nio Y, Koike M, Omori H, Hashimoto K, Itakura M, Yano S, Higami T, Maruyama R. A randomized consent design trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur plus uracil (UFT) for gastric cancer - a single institute study. Anticancer Res 2004;24:1879-87.

9. Kodera Y, Sano T. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017;20:1-19.

10. Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P, Denlinger CS, Fanta P, Farjah F, Fuchs CS, Gerdes H, Gibson M, Glasgow RE, Hayman JA, Hochwald S, Hofstetter WL, Ilson DH, Jaroszewski D, Johung KL, Keswani RN, Kleinberg LR, Korn WM, Leong S, Linn C, Lockhart AC, Ly QP, Mulcahy MF, Orringer MB, Perry KA, Poultsides GA, Scott WJ, Strong VE, Washington MK, Weksler B, Willett CG, Wright CD, Zelman D, McMillian N, Sundar H. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:1286-312.

11. Kodera Y, Fujitani K, Fukushima N, Ito S, Muro K, Ohashi N, Yoshikawa T, Kobayashi D, Tanaka C, Fujiwara M. Surgical resection of hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer: a review and new recommendation in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:206-12.

12. AJCC. Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2010.

13. AJCC. Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.

14. AJCC. Cancer Staging Manual, 6th edition. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003.

15. Sano T, Kodera Y. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101-12.

16. Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Theise ND. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press; 2010.

17. Hu B, El Hajj N, Sittler S, Lammert N, Barnes R, Meloni-Ehrig A. Gastric cancer: classification, histology and application of molecular pathology. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;3:251-61.

18. Baek HU, Kim SB, Cho EH, Jin SH, Yu HJ, Lee JI, Bang HY, Lim CS. Hepatic resection for hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:86-92.

19. Chen L, Song MQ, Lin HZ, Hao LH, Jiang XJ, Li ZY, Chen YX. Chemotherapy and resection for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:2097-103.

20. Cheon SH, Rha SY, Jeung HC, Im CK, Kim SH, Kim HR, Ahn JB, Roh JK, Noh SH, Chung HC. Survival benefit of combined curative resection of the stomach (D2 resection) and liver in gastric cancer patients with liver metastases. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1146-53.

21. Dittmar Y, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Rauchfuss F, Götz M, Scheuerlein H, Jandt K, Settmacher U. Resection of liver metastases is beneficial in patients with gastric cancer: report on 15 cases and review of literature. Gastric Cancer 2012;15:131-6.

22. Garancini M, Uggeri F, Degrate L, Nespoli L, Gianotti L, Nespoli A, Uggeri F, Romano F. Surgical treatment of liver metastases of gastric cancer: is local treatment in a systemic disease worthwhile? HPB 2012;14:209-15.

23. Kinoshita T, Kinoshita T, Saiura A, Esaki M, Sakamoto H, Yamanaka T. Multicentre analysis of long-term outcome after surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastases. Br J Surg 2015;102:102-7.

24. Koga R, Yamamoto J, Ohyama S, Saiura A, Seki M, Seto Y, Yamaguchi T. Liver resection for metastatic gastric cancer: Experience with 42 patients including eight long-term survivors. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007;37:836-42.

25. Komeda K, Hayashi M, Kubo S, Nagano H, Nakai T, Kaibori M, Wada H, Takemura S, Kinoshita M, Koga C, Matsumoto M, Sakaguchi T, Inoue Y, Hirokawa F, Kwon AH, Uchiyama K. High survival in patients operated for small isolated liver metastases from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study. World J Surg 2014;38:2692-7.

26. Li S, Lee C, Hung C, Wu J, Chen J. Surgical resection of metachronous hepatic metastases from gastric cancer improves long-term survival: a population-based study. PLoS One 2017;12:1-10.

27. Liu J, Li JH, Zhai RJ, Wei B, Shao MZ, Chen L. Predictive factors improving survival after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases. Chin Med J 2012;125:165-71.

28. Makino H, Kunisaki C, Izumisawa Y, Tokuhisa M, Oshima T, Nagano Y, Fujii S, Kimura J, Takagawa R, Kosaka T, Ono HA, Akiyama H, Tanaka K, Endo I. Indication for hepatic resection in the treatment of liver metastasis from gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2010;30:2367-76.

29. Miki Y, Fujitani K, Hirao M, Kurokawa Y, Mano M, Tsujie M, Miyamoto A, Nakamori S, Tsujinaka T. Significance of surgical treatment of liver metastases from gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2012;32:665-70.

30. Morise Z, Sugioka A, Hoshimoto S, Kato T, Ikeda M, Uyama I, Horiguchi A, Miyakawa S. The role of hepatectomy for patients with liver metastases of gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2008;55:1238-4.

31. Nomura T, Kamio Y, Takasu N, Moriya T, Takeshita A, Mizutani M, Hachiya O, Hirai I, Kimura W. Intrahepatic micrometastases around liver metastases from gastric cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009;16:493-501.

32. Qiu JL, Deng MG, Li W, Zou RH, Li BK, Zheng Y, Lao XM, Zhou K, Yuan YF. Hepatic resection for synchronous hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:694-700.

33. Roh H, Suh K, Lee H, Yang H, Choe K, Lee K. Outcome of hepatic resection for metastatic gastric cancer. Am Surg 2005;71:95-9.

34. Sakamoto Y, Ohyama S, Yamamoto J, Yamada K, Seki M, Ohta KI, Kokudo N, Yamaguchi T, Muto T, Makuuchi M. Surgical resection of liver metastases of gastric cancer: an analysis of a 17-year experience with 22 patients. Surgery 2003;133:507-11.

35. Sakamoto Y, Sano T, Shimada K, Esaki M, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Katai H, Kosuge T, Sasako M. Favorable indications for hepatectomy in patients with liver metastasis from gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2007;95:534-9.

36. Takemura N, Saiura A, Koga R, Arita J, Yoshioka R, Ono Y, Hiki N, Sano T, Yamamoto J, Kokudo N, Yamaguchi T. Long-term outcomes after surgical resection for gastric cancer liver metastasis: an analysis of 64 macroscopically complete resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:951-7.

37. Thelen A, Jonas S, Benckert C, Lopez-Hänninen E, Neumann U, Rudolph B, Schumacher G, Neuhaus P. Liver resection for metastatic gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008;34:1328-34.

38. Tiberio GAM, Baiocchi GL, Morgagni P, Marrelli D, Marchet A, Cipollari C, Graziosi L, Ministrini S, Vittimberga G, Donini A, Nitti D, Roviello F, Coniglio A, de Manzoni G. Gastric cancer and synchronous hepatic metastases: is it possible to recognize candidates to R0 resection? Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:589-96.

39. Tsujimoto H, Ichikura T, Ono S, Sugasawa H, Hiraki S, Sakamoto N, Yaguchi Y, Hatsuse K, Yamamoto J, Hase K. Outcomes for patients following hepatic resection of metastatic tumors from gastric cancer. Hepatol Int 2010;4:406-13.

40. Viganò L, Vellone M, Ferrero A, Giuliante F, Nuzzo G, Capussotti L. Liver resection for gastric cancer metastases. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60:557-62.

41. Wang YN, Shen KT, Ling JQ, Gao XD, Hou YY, Wang XF, Qin J, Sun YH, Qin XY. Prognostic analysis of combined curative resection of the stomach and liver lesions in 30 gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases. BMC Surg 2012;12:20.

42. Wang W, Liang H, Zhang H, Wang X, Xue Q, Zhang R. Prognostic significance of radical surgical treatment for gastric cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases. Med Oncol 2014;31:1-8.

43. Zacherl J, Zacherl M, Scheuba C, Steininger R, Wenzl E, Mühlbacher F, Jakesz R, Längle F. Analysis of hepatic resection of metastasis originating from gastric adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2002;6:682-9.

44. Shiono S, Sato T, Horio H, Chida M, Matsuguma H, Ozeki Y, Nakajima J, Okumura S. Outcomes and prognostic factors of survival after pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2013;43:e13-6.

45. Yoshida Y, Imakiire T, Yoneda S, Obuchi T, Inada K, Iwasaki A. Ten cases of resected solitary pulmonary metastases arising from gastric cancer. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2013;22:578-82.

46. Iijima Y, Akiyama H, Atari M, Fukuhara M, Nakajima Y, Kinosita H, Uramoto H. Pulmonary resection for metastatic gastric cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;22:230-6.

47. Kobayashi Y, Fukui T, Ito S, Shitara K, Ito S, Hatooka S, Mitsudomi T. Pulmonary metastasectomy for gastric cancer: a 13-year single-institution experience. Surg Today 2013;43:1382-9.

48. Li C, Yan M, Chen J, Xiang M, Zhu ZG, Yin HR, Lin YZ. Survival benefit of non-curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg 2010;14:282-8.

49. Ko KJ, Shim JH, Yoo HM, Il SO, Jeon HM, Park CH, Jeon DJ, Song KY. The clinical value of non-curative resection followed by chemotherapy for incurable gastric cancer. World J Surg 2012;36:1800-5.

50. Hartgrink HH, Putter H, Klein Kranenbarg E, Bonenkamp JJ, van de Velde CJH. Value of palliative resection in gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:1438-43.

51. Saidi RF, ReMine SG, Dudrick PS, Hanna NN. Is there a role for palliative gastrectomy in patients with stage IV gastric cancer? World J Surg 2006;30:21-7.

52. Kokkola A, Louhimo J, Puolakkainen P. Does non-curative gastrectomy improve survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer? J Surg Oncol 2012;106:193-6.

53. Samarasam I, Chandran BS, Sitaram V, Perakath B, Nair A, Mathew G. Palliative gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: is it worthwhile? ANZ J Surg 2006;76:60-3.

54. Lin SZ, Tong HF, You T, Yu YJ, Wu WJ, Chen C, Zhang W, Ye B, Li CM, Zhen ZQ, Xu JR, Zhou JL. Palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2008;134:187-92.

55. Sougioultzis S, Syrios J, Xynos ID, Bovaretos N, Kosmas C, Sarantonis J, Dokou A, Tzivras D, Zografos G, Felekouras E, Papalambros E, Tsavaris N. Palliative gastrectomy and other factors affecting overall survival in stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011;37:312-8.

56. Funakoshi T, Yasui H, Boku N, Fukutomi A, Yamazaki K, Machida N, Todaka A, Tsushima T, Yokota T, Onozawa Y, Kenmotsu H, Endo M. Clinicopathological features and outcomes of gastric cancer patients with pulmonary lymphangitis carcinomatosa. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014;44:792-8.

57. Thomford NR, Woolner LB, Clagett OT. The surgical treatment of metastatic tumors in the lungs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965;49:357-63.

58. Fujitani K, Yang HK, Mizusawa J, Kim YW, Terashima M, Han SU, Iwasaki Y, Hyung WJ, Takagane A, Park DJ, Yoshikawa T, Hahn S, Nakamura K, Park CH, Kurokawa Y, Bang YJ, Park BJ, Sasako M, Tsujinaka T16; REGATTA study investigators. Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:309-18.

59. Waddell T, Chau I, Cunningham D, Gonzalez D, Frances A, Okines C, Wotherspoon A, Saff C, Middleton G, Wadsley J, Ferry D, Mansoor W, Crosby T, Coxon F, Smith D, Waters J, Iveson T, Falk S, Slater S, Peckitt C, Barbachano Y. Epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine with or without panitumumab for patients with previously untreated advanced oesophagogastric cancer (REAL3): a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2013;14:481-9.

60. Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, Lordick F, Ohtsu A, Omuro Y, Satoh T, Aprile G, Kulikov E, Hill J, Lehle M, Rüschoff J, Kang YK; ToGA Trial Investigators. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687-97.

61. Liao YY, Peng NF, Long D, Yu PC, Zhang S, Zhong JH, Li LQ. Hepatectomy for liver metastases from gastric cancer: a systematic review. BMC Surg 2017;17:14.

62. Sun J, Song Y, Wang Z, Chen X, Gao P, Xu Y, Zhou B, Xu H. Clinical significance of palliative gastrectomy on the survival of patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2013;13:577.

63. Krasniqi E, Pellicori S, Formica V. Emerging role of S-1 in gastric cancer. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2015;36:219-28.

Cite This Article

Systematic Review
Open Access
Surgical treatment of stage IV gastric cancer: is it worthwhile?
Ilaria Pergolini, ... Marco Catarci

How to Cite

Pergolini, I.; Ciano P.; Guercioni G.; Catarci M. Surgical treatment of stage IV gastric cancer: is it worthwhile?. J. Cancer. Metastasis. Treat. 2018, 4, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2017.84

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Export Citation File:

Type of Import

Tips on Downloading Citation

This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.

Citation Manager File Format

Use the radio buttons to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex.

Type of Import

If you have citation management software installed on your computer your Web browser should be able to import metadata directly into your reference database.

Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.

Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.

About This Article

Special Issue

This article belongs to the Special Issue Reviews of Gastric Cancer Metastasis and Treatment
© The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
6260
Downloads
1204
Citations
0
Comments
0
31

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

0
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Journal of Cancer Metastasis and Treatment
ISSN 2454-2857 (Online) 2394-4722 (Print)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/