REFERENCES
1. Shintake, J.; Cacucciolo, V.; Floreano, D.; Shea, H. Soft robotic grippers. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1707035.
2. Caruso, F.; Shea, H.; Cacucciolo, V. Electroadhesion suction cups. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e2420231.
3. Okuno, Y.; Shigemune, H.; Kuwajima, Y.; Maeda, S. Stretchable suction cup with electroadhesion. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800304.
4. Tang, Q.; Du, Y.; Ding, M.; et al. Study on the performance of vortex suction cup for an underwater inspection robot. Ocean. Eng. 2024, 300, 117462.
5. Tun, T. T.; Elara, M. R.; Kalimuthu, M.; Vengadesh, A. Glass facade cleaning robot with passive suction cups and self-locking trapezoidal lead screw drive. Autom. Constr. 2018, 96, 180-8.
6. Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Xia, G.; Wang, Y. Precise adhesion control of an UUV equipped with bioinspired hydrogel sucker. Ocean. Eng. 2024, 295, 116964.
7. Baik, S.; Kim, D. W.; Park, Y.; Lee, T. J.; Bhang, S. H.; Pang, C. A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi. Nature 2017, 546, 396-400.
8. van Veggel, S.; Wiertlewski, M.; Doubrovski, E. L.; et al. Classification and evaluation of octopus-inspired suction cups for soft continuum robots. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2400806.
9. Wang, Z.; Chen, J.; Sun, G.; et al. Biorobotic non-destructive adhesion strategy for biological tissues inspired by scavenger fish suction cups and haptic perception. Device 2026, 4, 100991.
10. Xin, Y.; Zhou, X.; Bark, H.; Lee, P. S. The role of 3D printing technologies in soft grippers. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2307963.
11. Papadakis, E.; Tsakiris, D. P.; Sfakiotakis, M. An octopus-inspired soft pneumatic robotic arm. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 773.
12. Galloway, K. C.; Becker, K. P.; Phillips, B.; et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft. Robot. 2016, 3, 23-33.
13. Calisti, M.; Giorelli, M.; Levy, G.; et al. An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots. Bioinspir. Biomim. 2011, 6, 036002.
14. Jiang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Cheng, G.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, J. Pneumatically actuated self-healing bionic crawling soft robot. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2020, 100, 445-54.
15. Hu, B.; Wang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Fu, Z. A miniature wall climbing robot with biomechanical suction cups. Ind. Robot. 2009, 36, 551-61.
16. Lian, Z.; Wang, L.; Jiang, Y.; et al. 3D-printed octopus-inspired PAM/CS hydrogels with excellent adhesion for high-performance ECG sensors. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 508, 161043.
17. Lee, S.; Akerson, A.; Pardakhtim, R.; et al. Deformation driven suction cups: a mechanics-based approach to wearable electronics. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e20417.
18. Wang, J.; Gao, G.; Guan, X.; Liu, H.; Xu, J.; Wang, T. A bionic gecko suction cup piezoresistive sensor with integrated patterned electrodes for limb movement and physiological electrical signal detection. ACS. Appl. Nano. Mater. 2024, 7, 26978-87.
19. Zhou, Z.; Zhao, J.; Li, R.; et al. Bio-inspired self-sensing suction cups for stable dynamic grasping. Sci. China. Mater. 2026, 69, 1044-53.
20. Pyo, G.; Park, Y. A passive suction cup gripper with a trigger-release mechanism. Intell. Serv. Robot. 2025, 18, 125-35.
21. Aoyagi, S.; Suzuki, M.; Morita, T.; Takahashi, T.; Takise, H. Bellows suction cup equipped with force sensing ability by direct coating thin-film resistor for vacuum type robotic hand. IEEE/ASME. Trans. Mechatron. 2020, 25, 2501-12.
22. Kim, M.; Song, M.; Son, J.; Hwang, G. W.; Park, H.; Pang, C. Effective HA‐loading strategy in internal dome‐assisted suction cups for enhanced transdermal delivery under vertical adhesion and vibration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e19672.
23. Yue, T.; Lu, C.; Tang, K.; et al. Embodying soft robots with octopus-inspired hierarchical suction intelligence. Sci. Robot. 2025, 10, eadr4264.
24. Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Xu, P.; et al. Octopus-inspired soft gripper with embedded triboelectric tactile sensor for underwater target recognition and grasp. Nano. Energy. 2025, 140, 111007.
25. Tao, D.; Gao, X.; Lu, H.; et al. Controllable anisotropic dry adhesion in vacuum: gecko inspired wedged surface fabricated with ultraprecision diamond cutting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1606576.
26. Li, S.; Tian, H.; Zhu, X.; Liu, M.; Li, X.; Shao, J. Gecko toe pad-inspired robotic gripper with rapidly and precisely tunable adhesion. Research 2025, 8, 0687.
27. Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Li, B.; et al. Gecko’s feet-inspired self-peeling switchable dry/wet adhesive. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 2785-95.
28. Tsujioka, K.; Matsuo, Y.; Shimomura, M.; Hirai, Y. A new concept for an adhesive material inspired by clingfish sucker nanofilaments. Langmuir 2022, 38, 1215-22.
29. Sandoval, J. A.; Sommers, J.; Peddireddy, K. R.; Robertson-Anderson, R. M.; Tolley, M. T.; Deheyn, D. D. Toward bioinspired wet adhesives: lessons from assessing surface structures of the suction disc of intertidal clingfish. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 45460-75.
30. Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Hu, D.; et al. Octopus-inspired self-adaptive hydrogel gripper capable of manipulating ultra-soft objects. Nanomicro. Lett. 2025, 18, 33.
31. Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Wang, C.; et al. 3D printing of octopi-inspired hydrogel suckers with underwater adaptation for reversible adhesion. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141268.
32. Shi, L.; Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, D.; Ji, Z.; Wang, X. Vat photopolymerization 3D printing hydrogels and bionic adhesive devices: a minireview. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2024, 9, 2301853.
33. Yun, J.; Jiang, D.; Huang, L.; et al. Grasping detection of dual manipulators based on Markov decision process with neural network. Neural. Netw. 2024, 169, 778-92.
34. Zhang, Y.; Yu, B.; Ma, S.; et al. Engineering surface-grafted polymers for adhesion and friction control. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2024, 157, 101888.
35. Zhou, L.; Ren, L.; Chen, Y.; Niu, S.; Han, Z.; Ren, L. Bio-inspired soft grippers based on impactive gripping. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2002017.
36. Linghu, C.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; et al. Fibrillar adhesives with unprecedented adhesion strength, switchability and scalability. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae106.
37. Fan, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; et al. Damage-free dry transfer printing of ultrathin films with on-demand interfacial adhesion: principles and applications. Soft. Sci. 2025, 5, 52.
38. Huang, M.; Liu, S.; Chi, Y.; et al. Multimodal sensing conductive organohydrogel electronics based on chitosan-encapsulated MXene nanocomposites for deep learning-enhanced ball sports recognition. Soft. Sci. 2025, 5, 24.
39. Fillion, R. M.; Riahi, A. R.; Edrisy, A. Design factors for reducing ice adhesion. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2017, 31, 2271-84.
40. Zhang, H.; Du, H.; Zhu, D.; et al. Ice adhesion properties on micropillared superhydrophobic surfaces. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 11084-93.
41. Prime, H.; Lowrey, S.; Blaikie, R.; Sommers, A.; Sun, Z.; Juras, J. Micro-fabricated aluminium surfaces for reduced ice adhesion. Exp. Therm. Fluid. Sci. 2022, 136, 110646.
42. Wright, M.; Parry, T.; Airey, G. Chemical pavement modifications to reduce ice adhesion. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Transp. 2016, 169, 76-87.
43. Yang, S.; Gerber, D.; Feng, Y.; et al. Dehydration drives damage in the freezing of brittle hydrogels. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eado7750.
44. Xiao, Y.; Friis, E. A.; Gehrke, S. H.; Detamore, M. S. Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus. Tissue. Eng. Part. B. Rev. 2013, 19, 403-12.
45. Wang, Y.; Xu, X.; Liu, D.; et al. Dimethyl sulfoxide mediated high-fidelity 3D printing of hydrogels. Addit. Manuf. 2024, 91, 104346.
46. Wu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, Z.; et al. Strong and ultra‐tough supramolecular hydrogel enabled by strain‐induced microphase separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2210395.
47. Liu, D.; Jiang, P.; Wang, Y.; et al. Engineering tridimensional hydrogel tissue and organ phantoms with tunable springiness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2214885.
