fig4

Figure 4. The work of a single muscle. (A and B) Relationship between the measured capacitive deformation and muscle contraction displacement. The change of Cs is consistent with the variation in muscle contraction displacement with the linear regression of R2 = 0.96; (C and D) Relationship between the muscle contraction force and RMS of EMG. The RMS of EMG matches the variation of muscle contraction force with the linear regression of R2 = 0.91; (E) Comparison of muscle work Ew, mechanical energy Em of the weight, and muscle oxygenation SmO2; (F) Linear regression between Em and Ew with R2 = 0.95; (G) Characterization of the measured Cs and EMG during multiple cycles of weight lifting with one single muscle; (H) Validation of muscle work during repeated weight lifting with one single muscle. The high-pass filtered Ew is consistent with Ewmith the linear regression of R2 = 0.95. RMS: Root mean square; EMG: electromyography.