Download PDF
Review Article  |  Open Access  |  28 Mar 2024

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Views: 285 |  Downloads: 33 |  Cited:   0
Soft Sci 2024;4:14.
10.20517/ss.2023.52 |  © The Author(s) 2024.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article


Soft robotics has emerged as a transformative field, leveraging bio-inspired novel actuation mechanisms to enable more adaptable, compliant, and sophisticated robotic systems. However, the portability of soft pneumatic actuators is typically constrained by the tethering to bulky power sources. This review offers a thorough analysis of autonomous power alternatives facilitated by chemical reactions for gas generation and absorption, a concept analogous to biological energy conversion processes. These bio-inspired strategies propel soft pneumatic actuators towards new horizons of autonomy and portability, essential for real-world applications. This comprehensive review explores the critical intersection of gas evolution reactions (GERs) and gas consumption reactions (GCRs) as a power source for pneumatic actuation in soft robotics. We here emphasize the importance and impact of bio-inspired design, control, efficiency, safety, and sustainability within soft robotics to not only mimic biological motions but to enhance them. This review explores the fundamentals of both pneumatic and chemically powered actuation, highlighting the need for careful consideration of reaction kinetics. Additionally, this work highlights key aspects of smart materials that draw from biological structures and response mechanisms, along with state-of-the-art techniques for precise pressure modulation. Finally, we chart prospective development pathways and provide a future outlook for bio-inspired soft robotics, emphasizing the transformative impact of integrating chemical actuation methods. This exploration underlines the quest for further autonomy in soft robotic systems and points towards the future opportunities in this exciting and fast-developing field.


Soft robotics, chemistry, pneumatic actuation, design, chemical power source, oscillating systems, chemical reactions, chemically driven pneumatic actuation


The evolution of robotics over the past decades has transformed the field and yielded more interactive and collaborative systems[1-3]. From agriculture and commodities to science, medicine, and manufacturing industries, robotic advancements have become embedded as critical components in diverse sectors of human development[4,5]. Historical events such as global pandemics and wars have underscored the significance of contingency robotic systems. Contingency systems capable of operating in hazardous environments or performing repetitive and collaborative tasks will allow humans to shift their focus to capital and knowledge-intensive industries[6,7].

The field of soft robotics draws inspiration from nature to create systems that replicate the adaptability, fluidity, and function of biological entities, with performance approaching that of the mimicked natural systems[8]. Beyond mimicking biological structures, soft robotics also aims to develop biocompatible systems to interact synergically with biological structures. As soft robotics and robotics evolve, we witness more autonomous, adaptable, modular, safer, and controllable systems that positively influence and benefit society[9]. It is paramount for industry and researchers to take safety and sustainability into consideration when designing or conceptualizing new systems[10]. By developing systems that can mimic, interact, and preserve biological systems, a complete soft robotics “triad” can be achieved[11] [Figure 1A].

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 1. Soft robotics triad: factors and examples regarding (A) the safe interaction, effective mimicking, and environmental preservation for soft robotics; (B) Pneumatic gloves for movement restoration and muscular rehabilitation. Reproduced with permission[12]. Copyright 2020, IEEE; and (C) Soft grippers for gentle biological sampling under water. Reproduced with permission[16]. Copyright 2019, AAAS; and (D) Soft system for apple harvesting. Reproduced with permission[17]. Copyright 2023, Elsevier. AAAS: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Developing systems capable of interacting with soft biological tissues (e.g., in nature to collect biological samples, or interacting with humans, as outlined below) is a major goal in soft robotics. Pneumatic soft actuators are a popular choice for developing bio-inspired systems by arranging multiple positive and negative pressure-actuated systems to mimic limbs. Hu et al. introduced positive and negative pressure-driven pneumatic actuators arranged in the shape of a glove system for hand rehabilitation [Figure 1B][12]. Recently, non-invasive pneumatic and hydraulic systems for sample collection and exploration in shallow waters have been proposed and tested[13-15]. Sinatra et al. developed a soft robotic system with ultra-gentle manipulation for interacting with softer species such as jellyfish [Figure 1C][16]. Other systems with the ability for gentle manipulation can also interact with other natural specimens such as fruits and vegetables using pneumatic grippers. Wang et al. proposed a novel soft robotic gripper comprised of positive pressure-driven robotic fingers and a negative pressure-driven suction cup for apple harvesting [Figure 1D][17].

However, the realm of soft robotics is not limited to non-human interactions. A key research focus lies in developing implantable soft robots designed to address and prevent muscular failure-related issues. These medical conditions, including urinary incontinence (UI)[18], muscular dystrophy (MD)[19], sarcopenia, and other muscle-related complications[20], arise due to disease, aging, or trauma. There is widespread interest in preventing and restoring muscular malfunctioning of damaged muscle tissue and other medical conditions related to the mobility and control of smooth or rough muscles[21-24]. Rehabilitation gloves[25], apparel that improves mobility[26], and other important topics related to well-being and opportunities to increase life quality are of significant interest to soft roboticists[27,28]. By exploring innovative soft robotic solutions, researchers aim to improve treatment and rehabilitation options for patients suffering from these debilitating conditions.

While several mechanisms drive soft robots, pneumatic soft actuators are among the most popular and researched soft actuators; their simple mechanism and compliance make them great candidates for achieving high mechanical forces (up to ~140 N)[29] and specific control. Their reliance on changes in pressures - particularly gases - to induce deformation underpins their popularity[30]. Among the different pressure sources commonly used to power soft actuators (see Section “Power sources”), gas evolution reactions (GERs) and gas consumption reactions (GCRs) have a promising role as innovative power sources for oscillating and cyclic pneumatic systems[31]. As we believe this chemical-based approach has the potential to revolutionize the mechanism of soft pneumatic actuation, this review explores and describes the potential of implementing GERs and GCRs for chemo-driven pneumatic actuation. To aid in designing future chemo-driven pneumatic actuation systems, we also carefully consider and address some of the safety and power requirements of these novel power sources.


Soft pneumatic actuators predominantly exhibit actuation strain and stress comparable to natural muscles[32]. Moreover, a considerable number of materials employed in their fabrication possess Young’s modulus values within the same range (105-107 Pa) as skeletal muscles[33-36]. Owing to the gas pressure driving the actuation, soft pneumatic actuators can accomplish distinct types of movements through designed tunability [Figure 2]. By integrating and configuring elastic and inelastic regions within the design, pneumatic actuation can achieve linear[37], bending[38], and twisting[39] motions when a pressure difference (∆P) is created between the internal pressure of the soft system and the atmospheric pressure (see Table 1 for examples).

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 2. Schematic of the deformation motions obtained by soft pneumatic actuation. (A) Linear actuation using folded membrane and strain-limiting geometries[37]; (B) bending actuation is achieved by the combination of a folded membrane and an inelastic region[38]; (C) twisting actuation is obtained by the combination of strain-limiting geometries and origami folding[39].

Table 1

Summary of common muscular actions and the average force and power generated in contrast with pump-driven and chemically driven soft pneumatic actuators

ActionTypical average force (N)Ref.
Natural muscular actions
Force to stand (one leg)800a
Overhead seated pull400*222*[40]
Overhead standing pull400*244*
Straight push seated227*96*
Straight push standing251*140*
Contracting quadriceps (no age range)460 ± 159[41]
Hand grip left (20-29)454 ± 94254 ± 52[42]
Hand grip right (20-29)486 ± 87285 ± 64
Anal sphincter7[43]
Power (W)
Plantar flexors extension630 ± 13[44]
Knee extensors606 ± 30
Hip extensors2,037 ±181
Soft robotics
Force (N)
High-force soft pneumatic actuator70[45]
Chemo-driven pneumatic actuator15[31]

Pneumatic soft actuation has been studied for a range of applications, from human assistance to hostile terrain exploration[47-49]. Hashem et al. reported an arrangement of soft pneumatic actuators as a concept for mimicking the smooth muscle contractions found, for example, in the digestive system[50]. The arrangement of bellows-type pneumatic actuators surrounding the soft tissue emulates the peristaltic contraction movements through their linear motions when pressurized. Chen et al. described the development and arrangement of soft grippers[51] that mimic the bending and twisting motions of a human wrist, providing precision and fine control for tasks such as delicate goods handling.

Geometry is a fundamental part not only of the motion achieved by soft pneumatic systems but also of their control and deployment. Origami, kirigami, and kerf patterns have served as inspiration for achieving controlled and tunable actuation[52,53]. Jin et al. reported soft pneumatic actuators with programmable shapes using various kirigami patterns through computational optimization strategies[54]. Furthermore, Melancon et al. developed large-scale multi-stable inflatable structures that lock in place after deployment by integrating bistable origami shapes into the associated pneumatic actuators[55]. They also developed modular origami structures with different stabilities to achieve controlled and tunable motions[56]. The significant advances in the design and control of soft pneumatic systems, as reported by Jin et al.[54] and Melancon et al.[56], undeniably showcase the vast potential of these systems [Figure 3]. The ability to achieve motion, control, and deployment in these systems, particularly those designed for portability, hinges critically on the power source. A major challenge for these and related systems is, therefore, the on-demand availability of portable pneumatic power sources. As these soft pneumatic systems become more compact and efficient, the need for compatible, lightweight, and efficient power sources becomes increasingly apparent to allow wide application of this approach.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 3. Geometry used as a resource for achieving tunable motions and controlled deployment. (A) and (B) portraying the use of origami patterns to move and deploy modular structures in a controlled way. Reproduced with permission[56]. Copyright 2022, Wiley Materials. Reproduced with permission[55]. Copyright 2021, Springer Nature; (C) shows pneumatic actuators with integrated kirigami patterns used to restrict specific regions of the actuator and achieve controlled actuation. Reproduced with permission[54]. Copyright 2020, Wiley Materials.

Power sources

Despite the numerous advantages of soft pneumatic systems derived from their fluid-driven nature in terms of tunability, applications and design, these systems tend to rely on heavy, rigid, and non-portable power sources[57-59]. Commonly used conventional power sources include air compressors and pumps. These devices utilize energy from electrical power or fuel combustion to generate the initial mechanical force necessary for air compression. This compressed air is then used as the driving fluid for pneumatic systems or cylinders.

A further commonly used power source is pressurized cylinders. This source does not rely on external energy once it is fully pressurized, and the pressure and flow of the gas are driven by the inner pressure of the cylinder and controlled by a pressure regulator. The use of the previously described power sources limits the portability and autonomy of pneumatic soft systems, making them completely tethered systems. Electronic design advances and new manufacturing processes allow the manufacture of battery-powered onboard pumps as the first approach toward more compact and portable soft systems[60,61]. The mechanical efficiency of soft pneumatic systems is dramatically reduced when the power sources are considered[62]. The weights of soft pneumatic systems range from 0.01 to 1 kg, while gas cylinders and air compressors can weigh as high as 50 kg[63-65]. When using air pumps, cylinders or micro-compressors, the final volume and weight of the set-up, considering the microcontrollers, batteries, tubing, and related components, significantly influences the produced power and energy densities of each system.

Breitman et al. have spearheaded efforts focused on the miniaturization and portability of pneumatic soft actuators[66]. Through an in-depth analysis of the internal fluid mechanics of different actuator geometries, the relevance of viscosity and compressibility in miniaturized pneumatic channels was reported. Their work on actuator miniaturization contributes significantly to studying complex fluid mechanics, thereby influencing the optimized miniaturization of associated power sources. Microcompressors powered by batteries are a popular choice owing to various available options, each tailored to the energy and control requirements of the specific system[60,67,68]. They work well for low-pressure systems; if larger pressures are required, a reconfiguration of multiple micro-compressors can be used, introducing more mass and volume to the total of the system. Another promising power source for pneumatic actuation is using soft electro-pneumatic pumps (EPPs) proposed by Diteesawat et al.[69]. Using the dielectrophoretic liquid zipping (DLZ) principle, a small bead of dielectric liquid between the closest point(s) of two electrodes amplifies the electrostatic forces. By arranging two distinct electrodes to ‘zip’ together when an electric charge is applied, high contraction is achieved, resulting in an EPP. The EPP, weighing only 5.3 grams, can deliver pressures up to 2.34 kPa and volumetric flow rates of 161 mL/min.

While these advances are significant, the high energy density of certain chemical reactions offers an untapped opportunity for onboard powering of pneumatic systems; this promising novel approach is explored in this review.


Applying chemical reactions, specifically GERs and GCRs, has the potential to revolutionize powering pneumatic actuators by improving portability and energy density. Wehner et al. made a significant contribution to this approach by using the platinum nanoparticle (PtNP)-catalyzed chemical decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) into O2 and H2O[70]. PtNPs were integrated using additive manufacturing techniques into the first entirely soft autonomous robot. A similar system exploring the decomposition of H2O2 into H2O and O2 as a power source was reported by Kim et al. using manganese dioxide (MnO2) as the catalyst, further underscoring the potential of chemical reactions as viable power sources[71].

While H2O2-based reactions offer one set of possibilities, it is critical to also consider using negative pressures to drive soft pneumatic actuation. Fortunately, as shown in Figure 4, chemical reactions are not confined to generating positive pressures; they can also be harnessed for negative pressure applications. Given this dual capability, a comprehensive understanding of the chemical energy sources and pressures generated is essential to advance this emerging field.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 4. GERs and GCRs as power sources. (A) GERs: a gas is produced by the chemical reaction of one or more reactants, increasing pressure when the reaction takes place in a sealed system. When a soft pneumatic actuator is attached to the system, the increase in pressure results in the actuation; (B) GCRs: a gas is used as a reactant for reaction with other chemical species, resulting in the decrease of pressure when the reaction takes place in a sealed system. When a soft pneumatic actuator is attached to the system, the decrease in pressure results in actuation. GERs: Gas evolution reactions; GCRs: gas consumption reactions.

As recently demonstrated[31], neutralization reactions are an untapped source to power pneumatic actuators. Owing to the small amount of starting material required, these GERs and GCRs stand out as perfect candidates for wearable and potentially even implantable, pneumatic soft actuators.

Prior to detailing the reactions that could be implemented in chemically driven pneumatic actuation, it is important to understand the factors influencing the efficiency of both GERs and GCRs such as the kinetics and thermodynamics behind the reactions, from both a safety and an actuation optimization point of view.


The molar volume of gas

The molar volume of a gas is dependent on the temperature and pressure of the system. In the case of an isothermal reaction, the system temperature will be constant; therefore, the initial conditions of the system can be set as room temperature and pressure (RTP) conditions. As an example, the utilized values can be defined as:

Temperature (T) = 293K;
Pressure (P) = 1 atm;
Molar volume of a gas (VM) = 24 L·mol-1

Ideal gas law

According to the ideal gas law, the pressure of the system will be given, among other parameters, by its volume and the number of moles of gas it contains.

Boyle’s, Gay-Lussac/Charles’s, and Avogadro’s laws collectively inform the behavior of gases under various conditions of pressure, volume, and temperature[72-74]. The evolution and consumption of gases can be monitored by the change in pressure of a sealed system. By having a constant temperature and volume, the pressure change will be directly influenced by the change in the amount of moles (n) of gas resulting from the GER and GCR occurring inside the system.

The general gas equation in empirical form is expressed as:

$$ P V_{s}=n \mathrm{R} T $$

where P = pressure, VS = volume of the system, n = number of moles of gas, R = universal gas constant, T = temperature.

By monitoring the system pressure during and after the GER and GCR total completion, the final number of moles of gas in the system can be calculated by:

$$ n=\frac{P V_{s}}{\mathrm{R} T} $$

Le Chatelier’s principle

Le Chatelier’s states that when a system at equilibrium is subjected to a change, it will shift its position to counteract that disturbance. In the context of GERs and GCRs, this principle is of paramount importance in predicting how changes in pressure, volume, temperature, or concentration will affect the equilibrium position of the system.

If the concentration, pressure or volume of a substance is increased, the equilibrium will shift towards the side that consumes that substance. Conversely, if the concentration, pressure or volume is decreased, the equilibrium will shift towards the side that produces that substance. Temperature changes can drastically affect the position of equilibrium, especially in endothermic and exothermic reactions. For endothermic reactions, an increase in temperature will shift the equilibrium towards the products, favoring the forward reaction. Conversely, decreasing the temperature will shift the equilibrium towards the reactants, favoring the reverse reaction.

For reactions involving the evolution or consumption of gases, changes in volume or pressure can lead to profound shifts in equilibrium:

GER: reactions that produce gas will increase the total number of gaseous moles. An increase in pressure or decrease in volume will shift the equilibrium to the side with fewer gas molecules, often favoring the reactants.

GCR: reactions that consume gases will decrease the total number of gaseous moles. An increase in pressure or decrease in volume can shift the equilibrium to the side consuming the gas, often favoring the products.

While Le Chatelier’s principle provides insight into the thermodynamic aspects of a reaction with temperature changes, it is essential to remember that temperature also affects reaction rates (kinetics). A reaction may be thermodynamically favored at a particular temperature but kinetically inactive. For a simple yet elegant example, see the work on phase changes in alcohols to achieve actuation by Lee et al.[75].

Reaction kinetics

Reaction kinetics is the study of the rates of chemical reactions and the factors that influence these rates. The rate of a reaction describes how quickly the concentration of reactants decreases or the concentration of products increases over time[76].

For a general chemical reaction:

$$ a A+b B \rightleftharpoons c C+d D $$

where A and B are reactants, C and i are products, and a, b, c, and d are their stoichiometric coefficients.

The rate r of the reaction can be expressed as:

$$ r=-\frac{1}{a} \frac{\Delta[A]}{\Delta t}=-\frac{1}{b} \frac{\Delta[B]}{\Delta t}=\frac{1}{c} \frac{\Delta[C]}{\Delta t} $$

where t is time.

Experimentally, the rate law shows the relationship between the rate of a reaction and the concentrations of the reactants and takes the form:

$$ r=k[A]^{m}[B]^{n} $$

where m and n are called reaction orders and are obtained experimentally and defined using graphical methods, distinct from the stoichiometric coefficients.

Integrated rate laws and their implications

For various reaction orders, rate laws, when integrated over time, correlate the reactant concentration to time:

$$ \begin{align*} &Zero order: [A]=[A]_{0}-k \\ &First order: \ln [A]=\ln [A]_{0}-k \\ &Second order: \frac{1}{[A]}=\frac{1}{[A]_{0}}+k t \\ \end{align*} $$

where k is the rate constant, t is time, and [A] and [A]0 are reactant concentration and concentration at t = 0.

Concept of half-life: half-life (t1/2) denotes the time necessary for the concentration of the reactant to halve its initial value. For first-order reactions, it is expressed as:

$$ t_{1 / 2}=\frac{0.693}{k} $$

It is noteworthy that the half-life remains unaffected by the starting concentration.

The Arrhenius equation and activation energy: Activation energy (Ea) signifies the minimum energy required to start a chemical reaction[77]. The Arrhenius equation relates the rate constant, temperature, and the activation energy:

$$ k=A\;exp \left(\frac{\mathrm{E}_{a}}{\mathrm{R}T}\right) $$

where A is the pre-exponential factor representing a specific reaction-dependent constant.

In practice, temperature variations will influence the kinetics of the underlying chemical reactions and, consequently, the actuation behavior of these soft actuators. However, it is worth noting that the practical impact of temperature sensitivity can vary depending on factors such as the choice of reactants and the efficiency of the selected chemical reactions. For instance, as recently demonstrated by our group[31], highly efficient reactions with low reactant consumption may exhibit minimal sensitivity to temperature changes (ΔT = ~2 °C).

Energetic considerations

As described by Adami et al. for GERs and GCRs, the energy storage can be described in terms of fuel, even if not a conventional combustible fuel[78]. To accurately describe a pressure generation method, it is essential to consider the quantity of gas that can be generated.

The net flow factor, denoted as fn,v, is obtained based on the fuel’s initial volume Vfuel prior to expansion and the resulting volume of gas Vgas after the expansion, as determined by:

$$ f_{n, v}=\frac{V_{\text {gas }}}{V_{fuel}} $$

The gross flow factor fg,vis obtained by considering the total volume of the system Vsys (instead of the volume of the fuel):

$$ f_{g, v}=\frac{V_{g a s}}{V_{s y s}} $$

To consider the varying densities of the reactants (fuel) and the fuel system, the flow capacity is also included. The net flow capacity fn,mis calculated (similar to the determination of the net flow factor), employing the mass of the fuel mfuel. The gross flow capacity fg,mis calculated accordingly from the mass of the system msys:

$$ f_{n, m}=\frac{V_{gas}}{m_{f u e l}}, \quad f_{\mathrm{g}, m}=\frac{V_{gas}}{m_{s y s}} $$

The energy density of the reactants ωn,V can then be defined as the energy E per volume of fuel, and the energy stored per fuel mass or net specific energy ωn,mcan be defined similarly.

$$ \omega_{n, V}=\frac{\mathrm{E}}{V_{fuel}}, \quad \omega_{n, m}=\frac{\mathrm{E}}{m_{f u e l}} $$

According to Adami et al., the pressure-volume work W1,2, of an isothermal process with the ideal gas considerations is calculated by[78]:

$$ W_{1,2}=n \cdot \mathrm{R} \cdot T \cdot \ln \left(\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}\right)=P_{1} \cdot V_{1} \cdot \ln \left(\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}\right)=P_{2} \cdot V_{2} \cdot \ln \left(\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}\right) $$

As the energy leaves the GER or GCR system, the pressure-work value is considered negative. For GCRs, the pressure-volume work performed at an initial gas volume V1 is considered to be the effective energy of reactants or fuel. The effective energy density is then calculated by:

$$ \omega_{\text {eff }, v}=\frac{-W_{1,2}}{V_{1}}=\frac{P_{1} \cdot V_{1} \cdot \ln \left(\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}\right)}{V_{1}}=-P_{1} \cdot \ln \left(\frac{P_{2}}{P_{1}}\right) $$

Similarly, effective specific energy for a system with solid reactants is calculated by:

$$ \omega_{\text {eff }, m}=\frac{-W_{1,2}}{m_{1}} $$

Application of these equations will be shown in later sections of this review.


Positive gauged pressure (∆P > 0) is the most common and accessible type of pressure when pneumatic actuation is required. In this context, a few GERs have been investigated as potential energy sources for pneumatic actuation in soft robotics. Combustion reactions involving methane and butane have been studied for their high theoretical energy densities of 1.11 × 10-2 and 1.08 × 10-2 MJ/kg, respectively[78,79]. However, the highly explosive nature of combustion reactions requires using materials that can withstand the resulting localized elevated temperatures. These reactions generate elevated temperatures, which can range from 340 to 2,800 °C[80,81]. Systems that employ combustion as a power source typically incorporate discrete mixing chambers and sparking sources to facilitate the reaction.

The decomposition of H2O2 is another popular studied chemical reaction for pneumatic actuation. Pure H2O2 has a specific energy of 2.9 MJ/kg, which reduces to 1.45 MJ/kg for a 50% w/v H2O2 solution[78,82,83]. The O2 evolution rate can be modulated by varying the addition rate of H2O2 to the catalyst.

Acid-carbonate reactions have been recently explored as an efficient power source for pneumatic soft actuators. Okui et al. evaluated the neutralization reaction of sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) and citric acid as an inexpensive, nontoxic and ubiquitous alternative to power pneumatic soft actuators[84]. The exothermic chemical reaction has a reported conversion efficiency of over 97%, meaning it can produce over 23.3 L of CO2 per mol of starting material. Similarly, the GERs of CO2 from acid-carbonate reactions were explored using potassium carbonate (K2CO3), sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) or calcium carbonate (CaCO3), and adding hydrochloric acid (HCl)[31]. The CO2 evolution rates were controlled by adjusting the quantity of acid added to the carbonate-containing reservoir. Control over the reaction speed, and consequently pressure rise of GERs, provides an additional level of flexibility in the design and operation of chemically driven pneumatic actuation systems.

Other GERs, such as the hydrogen (H2) displacement from HCl by Zn and O2 evolution by water splitting, have also been briefly explored as means to power soft pneumatic actuators by harnessing direct gas release from the reactants[31] or implementing mechano-electrochemical methods using electrodes[85,86] [Table 2].

Table 2

GERs previously used in soft robotics

TypeReactionGas evolvedRef.
Water splitting2H2O (l) ↔ 2H2 (g) + O2 (g)O2[85]
Catalyzed decomposition of H2O22H2O2 (aq) → O2 (g) + 2H2O (l)O2[31,70,71,82,83,87]
Methane combustionCH4 (l) + 2O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2H2O (l)CO2[88,89]
Butane combustion2C4H10 (l) + 13O2 (g) → 8CO2 (g) + 10H2O (l)CO2[79]
Acid-carbonateC6H8O7 (l) + 3NaHCO3 (s) → Na3C6H5O7 (aq) + 3H2O (l) + 3CO2 (g)CO2[84]
Acid-carbonateK2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2KCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)CO2[31]
Acid-carbonateNa2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2NaCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)CO2[31]
Acid-carbonateCaCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → CaCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)CO2[31]
DisplacementZn (s) + 2HCl (aq) → ZnCl2 (aq) + H2 (g)H2[31]
Reversible adsorption(2/x)M + H2$$ \rightleftharpoons $$ (2/x)MHxH2[86]


Gas, as one of the four states of matter, is characterized by the random and constant movement of molecules. The transition from solid to liquid and ultimately to gas occurs as temperature and pressure varies. The selection of appropriate reactants, which can efficiently transition to the gaseous phase and produce the desired volume of gas, is essential for the optimal performance of actuators.

One of the most important characteristics of soft robotics is their suitability for interacting with and mimicking biological systems. Therefore, chemical reactions that utilize or produce noxious gases such as carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), ammonia (NH3), or chlorine (Cl2) will be briefly discussed but will not be considered as potential sources for soft pneumatic actuation. Fortunately, in contrast to the harmful gases previously discussed, various gases such as N2, CO2, or O2 are not harmful to biological systems or even play important roles in biological processes such as respiration, photosynthesis, pH regulation and ion-mobility processes crucial for cell metabolism[90]. Therefore, there is an extensive list of safe and appropriate chemical reactions with potential applications in soft robotics, specifically pneumatic soft actuators, as discussed below.

Acid-carbonate reactions

Acid-carbonate reactions are a type of acid-base reaction where the acid reacts with the carbonate to form a salt, H2O, and CO2 gas. These reactions occur through:

$$ \text {Acid} + \text {Carbonate} \rightarrow \text {Salt} +\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}+\mathrm{CO}_{2} $$

Most acid-carbonate reactions are exothermic reactions and will release heat, depending on the specific reactants and reaction conditions. Metal carbonates are of alkaline nature and some of the most abundant molecules on Earth, making them accessible to harvest and use within the soft robotics field[91]. In addition, CaCO3 has medical applications in treating and preventing osteoporosis and is also used as an antacid for indigestion[92]. Therefore, acid-carbonate reactions are a suitable and safe type of GER to be used within bio-inspired soft systems [Table 3].

Table 3

Acid-carbonate-based reactions for gas evolution[93]

Acid-carbonate reactions
CaCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
MgCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → MgCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
Na2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2NaCl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
K2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2KCl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
(NH4)2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2NH4Cl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
BaCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → BaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
ZnCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → ZnCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
CuCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → CuCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
FeCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → FeCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
PbCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → PbCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
Ag2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2AgCl (s) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
SrCO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → SrCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)
Cr2(CO3)3 (s) + 6HCl (aq) → 2CrCl3 (aq) + 3H2O (l) + 3CO2 (g)
Al2(CO3)3 (s) + 6HCl (aq) → 2AlCl3 (aq) + 3H2O (l) + 3CO2 (g)
Li2CO3 (s) + 2HCl (aq) → 2LiCl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)

The acid-carbonate reactions would ideally run until the reactants have been consumed or limited by their stoichiometry. However, the effectiveness of these reactions depends on several factors that should be considered. Among these factors, the most practical and influencing are the acid concentration, the acid concentration at the surface of the carbonate, the reactant concentration at the center of the carbonate, and the effective diffusivity of the acid within the carbonate. These factors can be partially controlled by the spatial distribution of the reactants in the reaction chamber which should simultaneously be designed to favor the acidcarbonate chemical reaction. The chamber design should benefit the transport of the reaction products (CO2, H2O, and salt) from the solidliquid interface to the bulk fluid in an ideally controlled mass transfer step[94,95].

Other GERs

Fermentation reactions are biological processes in which microorganisms break down organic compounds to produce gases, such as CO2 and CH4, and other products such as alcohols, acids, and organic acids. These reactions have been widely studied and used to produce fuels, such as methane and hydrogen[96], and in other industrial applications, such as manufacturing chemicals, biofuels, and food and beverage products. Fermentation reactions can be classified into several types, such as alcoholic fermentation, lactic acid fermentation, and acetic acid fermentation, each with distinct microorganisms and conditions to produce different by-products[97,98]. Studies by Dagle et al. have shown that fermentation reactions can be a cost-effective and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels and other traditional energy sources[99] [Table 4].

Table 4

Fermentation GERs

Fermentation reactionsBacteria
C6H12O6 (l) → 3CH4 (g) + 3CO2 (g)Methanogens
C6H12O6 (l) → CH3(CHOH)COOH (l) + CH3(CH2)OH (l) + CO2 (g)Lactobacillus
C6H12O6 (l) → 2CH3(CH2)OH (l) + 2H2O (l) + 2CO2 (g)Saccharomyces
C12H22O11 (l) + H2O (aq) → C2H5OH (l) + 4CO2 (g)Escherichia coli
C9H18O9 (l) → 2[CH3(CH2)COOH] (l) + CH3COOH (l) + H2O (aq) + CO2 (g)Clostridium
C12H24O12 (l) → CH3(CH2)2COOH (l) + 2(CH3COOH) (l) + 4CO2 (g) + 6H2 (g)Clostridium

Displacement reactions involve replacing one element in a compound with another. These reactions are commonly used to generate gases such as H2 and O2. One common application of displacement reactions is in producing H2 gas, which serves as a fuel source in various industries, such as transportation and power generation. For example, the reaction between Zn and HCl generates H2 gas and can be used in H2 fuel cells to produce electricity[100]. In addition to the reaction between Zn and HCl, another example of displacement reactions is in producing O2 gas, which is applied in various industrial and medical settings. For example, the reaction between KMnO4 and H2SO4 generates O2 gas and is leveraged in O2 generators in hospitals and submarines[101]. Furthermore, displacement reactions are also implemented in generating Cl2 gas, which is deployed in water treatment and disinfection. For example, the reaction between HCl and MnO2 generates Cl2 gas and is employed in water disinfection systems[102] [Table 5].

Table 5

Displacement reactions for gas evolution[103]

Displacement reactions
Zn (s) + 2HCl (aq) → ZnCl2 (aq) + H2 (g)
2HCl (aq) + MnO2 (s) → MnCl2 (aq) + Cl2 (g) + H2O (l)
Fe (s) + 2H2SO4 (aq) → FeSO4 (aq) + 2H2O (l) + SO2 (g)
2Al (s) + 6H2O (l) → 2Al(OH)3 (s) + 3H2 (g)
Ni (s) + 2HCl (aq) → NiCl2 (aq) + 2H2 (g)
Cu (s) + 4HNO3 (aq) → Cu(NO3)2 (aq) + 2NO2 (g) + 2H2O (l)
2KMnO4 (s) + 3H2SO4 (aq) + 5H2O (l) → K2SO4 (aq) + 2MnSO4 (aq) + 8O2 (g) + 6H2O (l)

Catalyzed decomposition of hydrogen peroxide

H2O2 is a strong oxidizing agent and is especially dangerous at high concentrations. It is crucial to handling it with care and use appropriate safety measures when working with it[104]. Despite these risks, H2O2 has a wide range of applications due to its ability to decompose into H2O and O2 gas[105,106]. The catalyzed decomposition of H2O2 is commonly used in the generation of O2 gas and steam and has been widely employed in various fields such as rocket propulsion, water treatment, and medical sterilization.

The decomposition of H2O2 in nature is typically catalyzed by enzymes such as catalase or peroxidase. These enzymes catalyze the breakdown of H2O2 into H2O and O2 gas through:

$$ 2 \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}_{2}(l) \xrightarrow{\text { cat }} \mathrm{O}_{2}(g)+2 \mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O}(l) $$

The reaction, when not catalyzed by enzymes, is highly exothermic and releases substantial amounts of energy, making it useful in generating heat and power. Among the most common catalysts used for this reaction are MnO2, silver (Ag), platinum (Pt), palladium (Pd), and iron (Fe).

MnO2 is inexpensive, stable, and easy to obtain, making it a popular choice in various H2O2-related fields. Ag is an effective catalyst for the H2O2 decomposition and is used in medical and industrial settings owing to its high catalytic activity. Pt is another highly active catalyst for the decomposition of H2O2 and is frequently employed in industrial contexts. Pd acts as a replacement for platinum in industrial usage. Fe, as a cheap and widely available catalyst, sees frequent use in industrial applications and water treatment.

The decomposition of H2O2 is also employed in the field of soft robotics for the actuation of pneumatic systems. This reaction serves as a means for inflating and deflating soft actuators, thus enabling motion in soft robotic devices. The reaction is safe, as it produces no toxic or harmful by-products. However, the storage of H2O2, especially in concentrated form, poses risks to consider; lower concentrations are safer but result in decreased reactivity, potentially affecting the gas evolution performance.


As mentioned in Section “POSITIVE PRESSURE”, combustion reactions have already been explored in soft robotics as a power source for pressure-driven soft actuators. Their working principle, instead of relying on the quantity of gas produced by the reaction, is explained by the localized and momentary elevated temperatures and, therefore, pressures reached during the combustion process. These reactions require O2 to occur, and, as previously mentioned, the amount of gas (O2) consumed is higher than the quantity of gas (CO2) produced due to the formation of H2O as a side product [Table 6]. Combustion reactions rely on heat rather than gas production to generate pressure, which is the reason that, regardless of their use and application in pneumatic soft actuators, these reactions are not considered GERs.

Table 6

Combustion gas evolution[103]

Combustion reactions
Combustion of methane
CH4 (g) + 2O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2H2O
Combustion of ethane
2C2H6 (g) + 7O2 (g) → 4CO2 (g) + 6H2O
Combustion of butane
2C4H10 (g) +13O2 (g) → 8CO2 (g) + 10H2O
Combustion of propane
C3H8 (g) + 5O2 (g) → 3CO2 (g) + 4H2O

Thermal decomposition

Contrary to combustion reactions, thermal decomposition reactions deliver a gas surplus by the end of the reaction. Take, for example, the use of baking powder in cooking. When subjected to elevated temperatures, NaHCO3 in the baking powder undergoes decomposition, releasing CO2, which contributes to the cake rising. Notably, the decomposition of NaHCO3 commences at around 80 °C, a temperature already considered high for biological systems.

Other more industrially focused instances of thermal decomposition reactions, such as the generation of N2 from sodium azide or the production of O2 from mercury oxide, are known[107]. However, these reactions occur at even higher temperatures of 275 and 500 °C, respectively.

One important aspect to highlight is the endothermic nature of thermal decomposition reactions. This necessitates considering supplemental energy sources to sustain the reaction. Furthermore, the requirement for a contained environment, especially at elevated temperatures, poses challenges in controlling these reactions. The need for precise temperature control and containment makes practically applying thermal decomposition reactions in certain settings particularly difficult [Table 7].

Table 7

Thermal decomposition reactions for gas evolution[108]

Thermal decomposition reactions
Decomposition of sodium bicarbonate
2NaHCO3 (s) → Na2CO3 (s) + H2O (g) + CO2 (g)
Decomposition of sodium azide
2NaN3 (s) → 2Na (s) + 3N2 (g)
Decomposition of mercury oxide
2HgO (s) → 2Hg (l) + O2 (g)


For lower temperature ranges, the evaporation of solvents such as methanol or ethanol has already been utilized in soft pneumatic actuators. Miriyev et al. proposed encapsulating these solvents in gas pockets using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based silicon elastomer[109]. The inner volume of each pocket or chamber increases due to the pressurization caused by the expansion of gases in the system when the solvent reaches its boiling point. Although these systems produce effective actuation, no chemical interaction occurs with the solvent and a secondary reactant. These vaporization processes are a physical phenomenon driven by external stimuli (temperature increases) resulting in a liquid-to-gas phase change, and thus not a chemical GER [Figure 5].

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 5. Vaporization diagram. Showing the migration of molecules from an aqueous phase to a gas phase placed over a heat source and the enthalpy of vaporization formula[110].

Lee et al. have recently reported the development of vaporization-based actuators using thermoelectric materials to achieve fast actuation responses via quick heating/cooling cycles[75]. Even though a chemical reaction is not involved in vaporization, it can be categorized as a gas evolution process of interest for soft robotics. Chemical reactions can offer a higher volume:reactant ratio compared with simple evaporation. This means that a smaller quantity of reactants can generate a larger volume of gas, resulting in increased actuation capabilities. Additionally, chemical reactions can be controlled and triggered with precision, allowing for on-demand actuation and modulation of force without needing external power sources. The advantages of one method over the other can vary depending on factors such as the desired actuation force, response time, environmental considerations, and available resources.


Within the pneumatic actuation field, only a few systems have exploited using negative pressures to achieve actuation compared to positive-pressure-driven actuators[39,64,111-113]. Similarly to pneumatic actuators, many negative-pressure-driven soft actuators rely on mechanical vacuum pumps to operate successfully[114]. Although several interesting designs allow full actuation, the vacuum pump requires a large (and heavy) power source and, similar to positive pressure systems, a series of connectors, microcontrollers, and batteries[115]. Since negative-pressure-driven actuation is limited by the strength of the materials used for the fabrication of the actuators, these systems offer a safer operating mechanism than those driven by positive, usually high, pressures via an inherent fail-safe mechanism[116]. For the use of GCRs, the safety considerations need to be assessed according to the nature of the used reactants.

A notable example of this approach is the combustion of hydrocarbons, where localized elevated temperatures are achieved. As a result, the use of appropriate personal protection equipment (including high-temperature gloves) is advised. It is worth mentioning that when the temperature is controlled, combustion reactions result in a gas molecules deficit, hence its consideration as both GER and GCR. The mechanism for the combustion of methane (first reaction, Table 8) requires two molecules of O2 as a precursor for every CO2 molecule created, meaning it uses three equivalents of gas in the system (one CH4 and two O2) for every equivalent of gas produced [Table 8]. As described by Heisser et al., a momentary vacuum or negative pressure is generated by the rapid cooling of the system when powering soft pneumatic actuators using combustion reactions[89]. The acid-base reaction of potassium hydroxide (KOH) with CO2, forming KHCO3 and H2O, was the first neutralization reaction successfully employed to produce negative pressures for driving pneumatic soft systems[31] [Figure 6]. To the authors’ knowledge, the use of GCRs for negative pressure-driven soft pneumatic actuators has only been reported in the aforementioned study. According to the reported results, the use of GCRs and their coupling with GERs for the oscillating actuation of soft pneumatic systems represent a significant opportunity for the soft robotics community to produce precise and compliant systems. These reactions are just a few within a broader category of similar chemical processes that will be further discussed in Section “GCRs”.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 6. GCRs as a power source for negative pressure-driven actuation. (A) The reaction rate of the GCR of KOH with CO2; (B) showing the effect of the GCR on the soft actuator when ∆P < 0. Reproduced with permission[31], Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert Inc. GCRs: Gas consumption reactions.

Table 8

GCRs previously used in soft robotics

TypeReactionGas consumedRef.
Methane combustionCH4 (g)+ 2O2 (g) → CO2 (g) + 2H2O (l)O2[88,89]
Oxidation4 Fe (s) + 3O2 (g) + 6H2O (l) → 4Fe(OH)3 (s)O2[31]
Metal hydroxideKOH (s) + CO2 (g) → KHCO3 (aq)CO2[31]


Hydroxides and CO2 reactions

Acid-base (or neutralization) reactions are a fundamental class of chemical reactions that involve combining an acid and a base to form a salt and H2O. According to the work of Brønsted and Lowry, acids are defined as proton donors and bases as proton acceptors. The reactions of CO2 with various hydroxides are typical examples of acid-base neutralization reactions, which have been extensively studied[117]. These reactions not only play a significant role in distinct industrial processes but also significantly influence the natural environment, such as in the carbonate-bicarbonate system in oceans and lakes. They are also known as double displacement reactions or metathesis reactions. In the case of the acid-base neutralization reactions involving CO2, the acid and base react to form a salt and H2O, with the salt often in solid form. An example is the reaction between CO2 and calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2], which forms CaCO3 as a precipitate and H2O; this reaction plays a significant role in the formation and dissolution of CaCO3 in natural systems such as coral reefs and shells[118,119] [Table 9].

Table 9

Hydroxide-based GCRs

CO2 absorption reactions
2NaOH (aq) + CO2 (g) → Na2CO3 (aq) + H2O (l)
Ca(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → CaCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Mg(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → MgCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Sr(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → SrCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Ba(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → BaCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
2Al(OH)3 (aq) + 3 CO2 (g) → Al2(CO3)3 (s) + 3 H2O (l)
Fe(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → FeCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Cu(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → CuCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Ni(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → NiCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Zn(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → ZnCO3 (s) + H2O (l)
Pb(OH)2 (aq) + CO2 (g) → PbCO3 (s) + H2O (l)

The production of carbonates, such as CaCO3, is an example of a precipitation reaction, i.e., to form an insoluble solid product. The overall balanced equation for a typical reaction producing carbonate is expressed as:

$$ \text {Metal hydroxide} +\mathrm{CO}_{2} \rightarrow \text {Metal carbonate} +\mathrm{H}_{2} \mathrm{O} $$

Oxidation reactions

Oxidation reactions use O2 as a reactant and are classified into two categories depending on whether they occur at room temperature or require specific conditions. The reactions that occur at room temperature involve, for example, the rusting of Fe, the reaction of Cu and mercury (Hg) with O2, the reaction of tin (Sn) with O2, the reaction of lead (Pb) with O2, and the reaction of ethanol (C2H5OH) with O2. For soft robotics, oxidation reactions are of interest due to the loss of gas (O2), which can be harnessed to generate negative pressures and, therefore, movement or change in shape. The speed of these reactions and the temperatures at which they occur are crucial as they directly influence the performance and functionality of soft robotic systems[120]. On the other hand, the reactions that require elevated temperatures or specific conditions to occur include the reaction of aluminum (Al), iron sulfide (FeS2), MnO2, carbon (C), sulfur dioxide (SO2) with O2, and the reaction of Fe with O2, HNO3 and H2SO4 (see Section “Oxidation reactions that do not occur at room temperature”).

Oxidation reactions that occur at room temperature

The reaction between solid Fe, gaseous O2, and H2O results in the formation of solid iron (III) oxide hydroxide [Fe(OH)3] at room temperature[121,122]. These reactions can occur at any temperature above 0 °C [Table 10].

Table 10

Oxidation-based gas consumption

Oxidation reactions
Room temperature
4 Fe (s) + 3O2 (g) + 6H2O (l) → 4Fe(OH)3 (s)
2Cu (s) + O2 (g) → 2CuO (s)
2Hg (l) + O2 (g) → 2HgO (s)
2Sn (s) + O2 (g) → 2SnO2 (s)
2Pb (s) + O2 (g) → 2PbO (s)
4Al (s) + 3O2 (g) → 2Al2O3 (s)
High temperatures
2Fe (s) + 3O2 (g) → 2FeO (s)
2FeS2 (s) + 7O2 (g) → 2FeO (s) + 4SO2 (g)
2MnO2 (s) + O2 (g) → 2MnO3 (s)
2C (s) + O2 (g) → 2CO (g)
2SO2 (g) + O2 (g) → 2SO3 (g)

Oxidation reactions that do not occur at room temperature

As mentioned at the beginning of Section “GCRs”, other oxidation reactions occur at high temperatures or specific pressure conditions to be energetically feasible; the listed reactions [Table 10] have been reported to occur at temperature ranges from 400 to 1,150 °C[123-125]. However, these high-temperature reactions are not typically relevant to the field of bio-inspired soft robotics. This is primarily because the materials used in these fields, such as elastomers and hydrogels, are designed to operate under ambient conditions and can degrade or lose their functionality under high temperatures[126,127]. Therefore, understanding and controlling reactions at such elevated temperatures is not a primary concern in these research areas.


Hydrogenation reactions are a type of chemical reaction in which hydrogen is added to double-bond containing (i.e., unsaturated) compounds, such as alkenes and alkynes, to convert them into saturated compounds. However, hydrogenation can be applied to other types of compounds as well under a range of conditions, including nitriles, aromatic compounds, CO2, ketones, nitro compounds, carboxylic acids, and esters [Table 11].

Table 11

Hydrogenation GCRs

Hydrogenation reactions
Unsaturated fatty acids
C17H33COOH (l) + H2 (g) → C17H35COOH (l)
R2C−O + H2 (g) → R2CH−OH
Nitro compounds
RNO2 + 3H2 (g) → RNH2 + 2H2O (l)
Carboxylic acids
C17H35COOH (l) + H2 (g) → C17H35CHO (l) + H2O (l)
RCOOR’ + H2 (g) → RCH2OH +R′OH
N2 (g) + 3H2 (g) → 2NH3 (g)

These reactions have been widely used in the chemical and food industries to modify the properties of various compounds[128]. Hydrogenation reactions can occur at RTP, but the reaction rate is typically low. To increase the reaction rate, catalysts are usually added, such as nickel (Ni), Pd or Pt[129,130]. Moreover, the reaction conditions, such as temperature, pressure, and H2 to unsaturated compound ratio, can also affect the reaction rate and selectivity.


The use of chemical reactions to actuate pneumatic soft actuators is an area that has seen limited research, even more so for integrating both positive and negative pressure sources within soft systems. Fatahillah et al. demonstrated that soft grippers simultaneously combining positive and negative pressure-driven actuation can exert larger forces at lower bending angles than actuators driven by positive pressure only[115]. These actuators consist of two independent channels, enabling them to combine contraction and extension forces through positive and negative pressures, respectively. Such soft grippers have shown the capability to securely hold objects weighing up to 4 kg with a negative pressure of only 200 mbar and a positive pressure of 600 mbar. This review has identified specific chemical reactions, as detailed in Section 3, which can meet the power and pressure requirements. Integrating these chemical reactions into an actuation system offers a promising avenue for fulfilling system requirements for soft grippers.

Interestingly, if GERs and GCRs are operated in separate reaction systems, they can be simultaneously incorporated into systems similar to that reported by Fatahillah et al. [Figure 7A][115]. Additionally, arranging these reactions serially within the same pneumatic system and pairing of a GCR and GER that reciprocally utilize the same gas as a product and reactant will facilitate oscillating motion via positive-negative pressure coupling[31].

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 7. Coupling of GER and GCR as power sources. (A) Parallel configuration: Both GER and GCR are activated or opened simultaneously, resulting in actuation from the rest state with the GERs and GCRs valve closed state, as described in ref[115]; (B) Serial configuration: the GER and GCR work independently and are alternated to achieve actuation in different directions. In this configuration, one power source is activated or open while the other remains inactive or closed, and the roles are reversed to change the direction of actuation. GER: Gas evolution reaction; GCR: gas consumption reaction.

Towards continuous actuation: coupling GER and GCRs

Chemical and safety considerations

As chemical reactions produce new products, the potential energy available in the resulting materials and systems can present safety challenges. This energy can be rapidly released as heat or pressure, determined by the kinetics and thermodynamics of the reaction[131], underlining the need for detailed knowledge prior to application. The main experimental dangers arise from mischarging reactants, insufficient studies of the thermo-chemistry, inadequate pressure or temperature control, unsuitable agitation, under-rated or inadequate reaction chambers and containers, and human factors[132]. Once the risks have been identified and assessed, the system involving the assessed chemical reaction must incorporate design measures to prevent those dangers.

There are a number of challenges when considering using chemical reactions for continuous actuation. The most significant factor is the precursor-product link between the GERs and GCRs. Further essential aspects to consider include response times (the time it takes for the actuator to react and perform the intended action) and compatibility (the materials used to fabricate the actuator must be compatible with the solvents or species used or generated in the reactions). Even if there is a precursor–product link between chemical reactions, by-products can interfere, compete, and dangerously interact with any involved species. For example, the reaction of chlorine and ammonia produces nitrogen chloride and hydrogen chloride. This reaction can produce various other by-products, including phosgene, a highly toxic gas. Phosgene can react with the desired products, nitrogen chloride and hydrogen chloride, to produce other toxic gases. This can lead to serious health problems or even death. Therefore, it is paramount to conduct a complete risk assessment of the intended reactions. Depending on the chemicals involved, they would exhibit different mechanisms of toxicity in humans. For instance, reactions where metal ions are produced can include side products such as highly reactive radicals, which are harmful and toxic to human cells[133]. The chemical reactions highlighted in this review for energy generation in soft actuators were meticulously chosen for their safety and non-toxic nature, except where specifically indicated otherwise. Among these reactions are water splitting, acid-carbonate reactions, combustion, thermal decomposition, displacement, vaporization, and fermentation, all used for producing GERs. In contrast, GCRs employ methods such as hydroxide-based reactions, oxygenation, and hydrogenation. For most of these reactions, both the reactants and products are considered safe and non-toxic. For example, the water splitting reaction, while primarily a safety concern due to its explosive potential, produces non-toxic gases. However, appropriate safety measures must be strictly adhered to when utilizing this reaction.

One of the greatest concerns when designing a suitable container for a GER is thermal runaway. In the worst case, an exothermic reaction is uncontrollably accelerated by the increase in temperature produced by the ongoing reaction. The accelerated reaction and increase in temperature can create secondary decomposition reactions with higher energy and are significantly more hazardous than the original reaction. Having a good understanding of the kinetics, the rate of the reactions, the potential for side reactions, and the stability of the products attained is essential for a successful and safe coupling of GERs and GCRs. Most importantly, the safety considerations to mitigate the potential hazards of GERs, including pressure build-up, fire and explosion, and toxic gas release, must be carefully discussed and assessed before designing and carrying out safe GERs and GCRs[134-136].

Once risk assessments are completed, and any safety concerns and potential hazardous outcomes of a GER and GCR coupling have been addressed, additional variables such as temperature, volume, pressure and stability of the reactants and products should be considered. As these variables are connected by the ideal gas law, the size and construction of the materials in contact with the reagents and products are fundamental factors that require a careful design process. By carefully selecting the volume of the container and the amount of reactant used, it is possible to create conditions where the GERs and GCRs can proceed efficiently without being significantly influenced by temperature changes. A good example of this size consideration can be found in our previous work[31] where a GER and GCR were successfully combined. The latter was set by carefully studying the selected chemical reaction and tailoring the reaction chamber to it, which allowed the use of low amounts of reactants to develop a safe and appropriate coupling of GERs and GCRs without noticeable temperature variation.

Design and control

Working with matter in its separate phases simultaneously is common in the chemistry field. The combination of and reaction between solids, liquids and gases are determined by surface interactions at two or more phases. Since applying chemical reactions in soft pneumatic systems relies on the interaction of gases with other reactants, a good understanding of such interactions is needed[11]. The primary concern to create coupled GERs-GCRs is to enable gas interaction (formed from the GER) with GCR reactants. To this end, the focus is set on detailing actuator designs that could allow this type of interaction in various ways. Since most of the produced pneumatic soft systems focus on the actuator design, the design of the power sources is neglected (apart from miniaturization). When having two separate but compatible power sources, e.g., GER and GCR, their design and correct coupling is crucial to obtaining the maximum and most effective actuation response. As shown in Figure 7, the configuration, isolation, and integration of both GER and GCR in a unified system offer initial variations and options to satisfy varied actuation mechanisms.

A parallel and isolated configuration [Figure 7] is desired when the actuation and functioning of a system rely upon the simultaneous application of positive and negative pressures. As detailed by Fatahllilah et al., positive-negative pressure (PNP) actuators contain two separate pneumatic actuators; when actuated simultaneously, via pressure increase or decrease, they achieve a larger bending force at lower bending angles[115]. Most of the soft pneumatic systems reported in literature work with individual pressure stimuli (positive or negative) comprising single or interconnected fluid chambers. For this type of individual pressure actuation, a serial and interconnected configuration of GER and GCR is desired. Both PNP and individual pressure actuation systems, with the appropriate configuration, would need a cascade arrangement of chemical reactions to allow an oscillating and cyclic performance akin to those found in electronically or electromechanically controlled systems.

Typically, actuators driven by chemical reactions exhibit varying response times and actuation forces, primarily influenced by the cycles of gas evolution and consumption reactions[31,84,88,137]. Compared to conventional pneumatic systems, these chemical reaction-driven actuators may demonstrate slower response times and reduced force generation. For example, standard pneumatic systems, comprising a compressed air source, connection lines, flow-controlling valves, and regulated air receivers, can reduce rise times to the millisecond range[138] and offer tunable force output depending on the intended application[139]. In contrast, the response time of chemically powered pneumatic actuators is typically within the seconds to minutes range[31,70], and the force generated directly depends on the amount of gas produced and the internal volume of the soft actuators. It is important to note that while chemical reaction-driven actuators might not match the rapid response or high-force generation of conventional systems, they offer unique advantages in terms of design flexibility, miniaturization, and suitability for specific environments or applications.

In investigations where the coupling of GER and GCR has been evaluated for soft actuators[31], the reaction chambers comprise over 95% of the total system volume (including the actuator). The volume of reactants, for both GER and GCR coupling, required only about 5% of the total volume of the system. As mentioned earlier, surface interactions are crucial for the effective completion of the GER and GCR involved, with interfacial areas of the systems and gas solubility playing a crucial role on the reaction kinetics for this type of reaction[140-142]. Challenges, including small gas-liquid interface areas and poor gas miscibility, can be addressed by reducing the volume allocated for the power source and carefully designing reaction chambers with larger surface area for optimal chemical interactions. Furthermore, scaling these systems to larger robots introduces additional challenges, such as maintaining effective reaction kinetics at increased scales. Such challenges will necessitate innovative design and material selection approaches for larger-scale soft actuators.

To achieve independence from electrical systems, the soft and compliant properties of materials used in soft system fabrication have been leveraged to create integrated and non-electric fluidic circuits with logic-operating principles similar to those found in electronic circuits[143,144]. Analogous to electronic circuits, a fluidic “switch” can be considered a basic form of control, allowing, or blocking the signal propagation. Microfluidic boards composed of check-valves and switch-valves, which are autoregulated by geometric design, can function as charging capacitors as pressure builds up and bends the soft deformable layer between microchannels[145] [Figure 8A and B]. In this manner, system pressure dynamically autoregulates the soft controller, allowing for frequent oscillations under specific conditions. Constraints in channel and component sizes are the main limitations for optimal performance in these systems. Soft valves have been developed by exploiting the instability of elastomeric membranes, enabling them to switch, in a binary fashion, between pressures.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 8. Fluidic-based soft control systems (A) A check-valve and switch-valve in both the open and closed state based on differential pressure and their corresponding component state symbol along with the analog diode and p-channel JFET transistor components. Reproduced with permission[145]. Copyright 2010, Springer Nature; (B) Showing the different components for actuation, control and sensing to create autonomous crawling systems combining bistable valves, soft logic gates and soft pneumatic actuators[143,144]. Reproduced with permission[143]. Copyright 2021, AAAS. JFET: Junction field-effect transistor; AAAS: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

By selectively adjusting the printing or manufacturing density of materials, it becomes possible to create reaction chambers within the actuator, provided the reactants are safe for interaction[146]. In addition to reaction chambers, a flexible power chamber, such as an expanding bladder made from non-extensible materials, can also be employed. However, it is important to ensure that the volume change under pressure does not influence the robot actions[147]. Developing suitable containment systems is crucial for enhancing efficiency and reducing the number of reactants needed per reaction. Furthermore, miniaturization and portability of power sources are essential for creating optimal, efficient, and fully autonomous soft systems.

The pursuit of autonomous soft systems promotes developing systems capable of executing routines with minimal human intervention. Depending on the desired routine, power input in soft pneumatic systems is typically regulated by the passive operation of electrical switches, regulators, or valves that periodically supply the actuators.

Wehner et al. demonstrated control methods with GERs[70]. Oscillating pneumatic actuation has been achieved by transporting H2O2 through microfluidic control boards into catalytic chambers, generating O2 and pressurizing the system. Although not yet proven with GER-GCR coupling systems, the working principle based on fluid pressure seems compatible and suitable for achieving oscillating and cycling actuation via the coupling of GER and GCR [Figure 9A]. The working principle of bistable flexible membranes in rubber “poppers” allows these valves to harvest power only while transitioning between open and closed configurations [Figure 9B and C]. Carefully selecting and tuning the mechanical properties of membranes ensure that the switch remains in its selected position without any applied force and will not switch its configuration until the necessary force to “snap” the membrane back is achieved.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 9. Fluidic-based control technologies in soft systems. (A) The “Octobot” featuring a series of microfluidic channels to manage the pneumatic actuation of the octopus-like tentacles. Reproduced with permission[70]. Copyright 2016, Springer Nature; (B) A jumping actuator inspired by rubber popper toys, combining gas pressurization and the snapping mechanism of a bistable membrane for actuation. Reproduced with permission[148]. Copyright 2020, Science Robotics; (C) Bistable valve utilizing the snapping mechanism of a bistable membrane to regulate fluid flow. Reproduced with permission[149]. Copyright 2018, Science Robotics.


Efficiency and control

One of the most attractive features of chemo-driven pneumatic actuation is that it can be used to create autonomous actuators, with the long-term goal of finding self-sustaining (oscillating) coupled chemical reactions to negate the requirements for an external power source[70]. This makes chemo-driven pneumatic actuation well-suited for applications where power is limited or unavailable. However, achieving fully oscillating pneumatic systems presents a significant challenge due to thermodynamic constraints[150]. For instance, certain fully oscillating chemical reactions, such as the Belousov-Zhabotinsky (BZ) reaction, are known but are very slow and complex[151]. Additionally, advantages and disadvantages of chemical-based pneumatic actuation are generally related to the type of GER and GCR used, such as the actuation speed and the achievable amplitude motion. It is noteworthy that other factors related to the materials selection for fabricating the embedded reaction chambers and pneumatic actuators must be considered to avoid issues related to material fatigue or degradation.

As this review focuses on using various chemical reactions for actuation in soft robotic systems, it is important to highlight that the “ideal” chemical reaction highly depends on the specific application. In medical applications, biocompatibility and precision are paramount, necessitating safe and controllable reactions[152]. For underwater robotics, reactions efficient in low-oxygen environments are preferred[153]. In industrial settings, factors such as speed, scalability, and cost take precedence[154]. This diversity in requirements underscores the need for tailored approaches in selecting chemical reactions for soft robotics, a theme that has recurred throughout our discussions on GERs and GCRs.

Looking ahead, there is an unexplored opportunity in exploiting bio-based reactions such as enzyme-based reactions for chemo-driven pneumatic actuation[155]. The use of bio-catalysts could potentially offer more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives while maintaining high efficiency at low temperatures and pressures.

Furthermore, chemo-driven pneumatic actuation can also benefit from external agents or specific conditions to boost its efficiency and control. In this context, materials science has made significant strides by developing diverse materials that can include embedded or encapsulated catalysts for powering reactions that drive actuation[156-158]. These materials not only serve as catalysts to augment GERs and GCRs, thereby reducing the energy requirements for reactions to proceed, but also offer gas selectivity and affinity for superior control over production and consumption ratios.

However, as mentioned, one of the primary challenges when coupling GERs and GCRs lies in exerting control over gas capture and storage[10]. To address this issue, a range of smart materials showing promising potential for integration into chemo-driven pneumatic soft actuators has been introduced[159]. One promising strategy for controlling gas capture and storage involves employing porous materials[160-163]. Characterized by an intricate network of interconnected pores, these materials can be tailored to selectively trap and release gases. This intrinsic and hierarchical porosity positions them as highly effective candidates for gas storage and separation.

While porous materials and liquids are indeed smart materials solutions based on innovative chemistry, their ability to convert into gas or remove gas brings them into the realm of chemical approaches. For instance, hierarchical pressure-driven systems could potentially be developed if a material absorbs and desorbs gases within a pressurized system[164,165]. Giri et al. have successfully explored the concept of porous liquids[166], where gas molecules are trapped within the molecular cages of a liquid, introducing volumetric vacancies to the liquid. This approach could be extended to designing hierarchically porous systems that utilize both porous materials and porous liquids to enhance gas capture, storage and on-demand release[167].

A simple approach to obtain the efficiency of the presented chemical reactions is by yielding the products obtained. This strategy will depend not only on the reactants but also on the physical characteristics or architectures of the reaction chambers, the distribution of the reactants, and the mass transfer of the products to further favor the reaction process (see Section “THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS”). In a more general fashion, the efficiency could be expressed as the ratio of the output energy to the supplied (or input) energy. This concept would lead to calculations of the energy demands (energy yields) of the reactions conducted under the different conditions and architectures of the reactor or reaction chamber[134,168].

Developing more efficient and controllable chemo-driven pneumatic soft actuation systems and materials could revolutionize soft robotics and have a wide range of practical applications in fields such as biomedical engineering and advanced manufacturing.

Design and manufacturing

By exploring and integrating various geometries and material densities, the rapidly growing field of soft pneumatic actuation has unlocked a broad spectrum of achievable motions (i.e., linear, bending, and twisting)[169]. Nevertheless, it is paramount to start considering integrating power sources within the design of chemo-driven pneumatic actuators. Bio-inspiration is already widely accepted and exploited for soft robotics and has been a primary source of inspiration for motion and material design[35,170]. For example, chambers for storing chemicals can be found in many biological systems[171,172]. It is envisaged that a significant step toward achieving the autonomy of chemo-driven pneumatic systems can be made by assigning a dedicated compartment for storing reactants and gases.


As mentioned in Section “Towards continuous actuation: coupling GER and GCRs”, the safety of new systems that generate pressure or vacuums needs to be carefully understood to inform the design of future systems. Many of the systems suggested can be controlled via feed ratios, and the products and reactants are selected to be biocompatible in many cases. Although future work will pave the way for introducing physical barriers (such as flow gates) to prevent uncontrolled chemical reactions, consideration has to be given to the chemical degradation of the materials used over time, embedded reaction chambers and their degradation and the ability of the system to vent in a safe fashion when potentially overpressurized.


The concerns regarding sustainability come under two areas. Firstly, it is crucial for future systems to focus on regenerating starting materials for both GERs and GCRs. Achieving sustainability may involve creating closed loops by coupling these reactions, although the number of effective cycles will be inherently limited. An innovative approach is to generate starting materials from biological sources, such as harnessing gas production from gut bacteria or leveraging natural pH variations within biological systems, to maintain the viability of these meticulously designed systems. Secondly, when considering the response of the actuator to these reactions, it is essential to address both the degradation of the systems and the potential loss of functionality. To ensure compatibility with biological systems, comprehensive testing over repeated cycles is necessary, particularly focusing on resolving issues related to the reservoirs and power sources of actuators. To address the concern of gas loss through material fatigue (and degradation) with prolonged use, recent advances in self-healing materials offer a promising solution. For instance, a study by Terryn et al. demonstrates the development of self-healing elastomers, thereby mitigating the risk of gas leakage and prolonging the functional lifespan of actuators[173]. Incorporating such self-healing systems within the makeup of actuators could significantly enhance the sustainability and durability of soft pneumatic actuators, especially in long-term application settings.

In conclusion, we believe that significant opportunities exist, in carefully chosen application areas, to expand the use of chemo-pneumatic soft actuation. Although this field is in its early stages of development, noteworthy pathways already exist related to a) the application of bio-inspired design and b) the rules for safe and long-term sustainable solutions to soft actuation. The hope is that this overview of the field, the detailed discussion of all aspects of efficiency and control, design, safety, and sustainability, as shown in the roadmap presented in Figure 10, will lead to innovation in the research, development and application of chemo-driven pneumatic actuators.

Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation

Figure 10. Roadmap towards chemo-driven pneumatic actuation. Crucial areas of consideration for the development of reliable, sustainable, and compliant chemo-driven pneumatic soft actuators. Dashed arrows represent the feedback loops present on each of the crucial areas to allow for the optimization of chemo-driven actuators.



This manuscript significantly extends and elaborates upon the work previously conducted by Villeda-Hernandez M for his doctoral thesis, officially submitted on October 03, 2023. The thesis has been appropriately cited within the manuscript, ensuring that this foundational piece of work is recognized for its contribution to the field of pneumatic soft actuation. All authors acknowledge the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for their funding under grant No. EP/T020792/1.

Author’s contributions

Conceptualized and designed the review: Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC

Wrote the original draft: Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC, Romero C

Reviewed and edited the final manuscript: Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC, Romero C, Faul CFJ, Rossiter JM

Provided supervision: Faul CFJ, Rossiter JM

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

All authors thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) grant No. EP/T020792/1 via the emPOWER project.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.


© The Author(s) 2024.


1. Bao G, Fang H, Chen L, et al. Soft robotics: academic insights and perspectives through bibliometric analysis. Soft Robot 2018;5:229-41.

2. Jumet B, Bell MD, Sanchez V, Preston DJ. A data-driven review of soft robotics. Adv Intell Syst 2022;4:2100163.

3. Li M, Pal A, Aghakhani A, Pena-Francesch A, Sitti M. Soft actuators for real-world applications. Nat Rev Mater 2022;7:235-49.

4. Bresnahan TF, Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies ‘Engines of growth’? J Econom 1995;65:83-108.

5. Reuveny R, Thompson WR. Leading sectors, lead economies, and economic growth. Rev Int Political Econ 2001;8:689-719.

6. Wang Y, Low FZ, Low YY, et al. Using early health economic modeling to inform medical innovation development: a soft robotic sock in poststroke patients in Singapore. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023;39:e4.

7. Gariya N, Kumar P, Dobriyal R. A review on soft robotic technologies. AIP Conf Proc 2023;2521:050004.

8. Stuttaford-Fowler A, Samani H, Yang CY. Biomimicry in soft robotics actuation and locomotion. In: 2022 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE); 2022 May 26-29; Taichung, Taiwan, China. IEEE; 2022. pp. 17-21.

9. Whitesides GM. Soft robotics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2018;57:4258-73.

10. Hartmann F, Baumgartner M, Kaltenbrunner M. Becoming sustainable, the new frontier in soft robotics. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2004413.

11. Villeda Hernandez M. Chemo-driven soft pneumatic actuation: from catalysts to neutralisation reactions for oscillating pneumatic systems. Bristol, United Kingdom: University of Bristol; 2023. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

12. Hu D, Zhang J, Yang Y, Li Q, Li D, Hong J. A novel soft robotic glove with positive-negative pneumatic actuator for hand rehabilitation. In: 2020 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM); 2020 Jul 6-9; Boston, MA, USA. IEEE; 2020. pp. 1840-7.

13. Katzschmann RK, Marchese AD, Rus D. Hydraulic autonomous soft robotic fish for 3D swimming. In: Hsieh M, Khatib O, Kumar V, editors. Experimental robotics. Cham: Springer; 2016. pp. 405-20.

14. Galloway KC, Becker KP, Phillips B, et al. Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Robot 2016;3:23-33.

15. Katzschmann RK, DelPreto J, MacCurdy R, Rus D. Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish. Sci Robot 2018;3:eaar3449.

16. Sinatra NR, Teeple CB, Vogt DM, Parker KK, Gruber DF, Wood RJ. Ultragentle manipulation of delicate structures using a soft robotic gripper. Sci Robot 2019;4:eaax5425.

17. Wang X, Kang H, Zhou H, Au W, Wang MY, Chen C. Development and evaluation of a robust soft robotic gripper for apple harvesting. Comput Electron Agric 2023;204:107552.

18. Vaughan CP, Markland AD. Urinary incontinence in women. Ann Intern Med 2020;172:ITC17-32.

19. Emery AEH. The muscular dystrophies. Lancet 2002;359:687-95.

20. Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR, et al. Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022;13:86-99.

21. Roche ET, Horvath MA, Wamala I, et al. Soft robotic sleeve supports heart function. Sci Transl Med 2017;9:eaaf3925.

22. Payne CJ, Wamala I, Bautista-Salinas D, et al. Soft robotic ventricular assist device with septal bracing for therapy of heart failure. Sci Robot 2017;2:eaan6736.

23. Simons MF, Digumarti KM, Le NH, et al. B:Ionic glove: a soft smart wearable sensory feedback device for upper limb robotic prostheses. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2021;6:3311-6.

24. Payne CJ, Wamala I, Abah C, et al. An implantable extracardiac soft robotic device for the failing heart: mechanical coupling and synchronization. Soft Robot 2017;4:241-50.

25. Polygerinos P, Wang Z, Galloway KC, Wood RJ, Walsh CJ. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Rob Auton Syst 2015;73:135-43.

26. Helps T, Taghavi M, Manns S, Turton AJ, Rossiter J. Easy undressing with soft robotics. In: Giuliani M, Assaf T, Giannaccini M, editors. Towards autonomous robotic systems. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 79-90.

27. Haynes AC, Lywood A, Crowe EM, Fielding JL, Rossiter JM, Kent C. A calming hug: design and validation of a tactile aid to ease anxiety. PLoS One 2022;17:e0259838.

28. Morris L, Cramp M, Turton A. User perspectives on the future of mobility assistive devices: Understanding users’ assistive device experiences and needs. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2022;9:20556683221114790.

29. Li H, Yao J, Zhou P, Chen X, Xu Y, Zhao Y. High-force soft pneumatic actuators based on novel casting method for robotic applications. Sens Actuators A Phys 2020;306:111957.

30. Pagoli A, Chapelle F, Corrales-ramon J, Mezouar Y, Lapusta Y. Review of soft fluidic actuators: classification and materials modeling analysis. Smart Mater Struct 2022;31:013001.

31. Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC, Romero C, Rossiter JM, Dicker MPM, Faul CFJ. Chemically driven oscillating soft pneumatic actuation. Soft Robot 2023;10:1159-70.

32. Wang J, Gao D, Lee PS. Recent progress in artificial muscles for interactive soft robotics. Adv Mater 2021;33:e2003088.

33. Hines L, Petersen K, Lum GZ, Sitti M. Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Adv Mater 2017;29:1603483.

34. Autumn K, Majidi C, Groff RE, Dittmore A, Fearing R. Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. J Exp Biol 2006;209:3558-68.

35. Coyle S, Majidi C, Leduc P, Hsia KJ. Bio-inspired soft robotics: material selection, actuation, and design. Extrem Mech Lett 2018;22:51-9.

36. Peng Y, Serfass CM, Kawazoe A, et al. Elastohydrodynamic friction of robotic and human fingers on soft micropatterned substrates. Nat Mater 2021;20:1707-11.

37. Luo M, Skorina EH, Tao W, Chen F, Onal CD. Optimized design of a rigid kinematic module for antagonistic soft actuation. In: 2015 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Practical Robot Applications (TePRA); 2015 May 11-12; Woburn, MA, USA. IEEE; 2015. pp. 1-6.

38. Hu W, Mutlu R, Li W, Alici G. A structural optimisation method for a soft pneumatic actuator. Robotics 2018;7:24.

39. Jiao Z, Ji C, Zou J, Yang H, Pan M. Vacuum-powered soft pneumatic twisting actuators to empower new capabilities for soft robots. Adv Mater Technol 2019;4:1800429.

40. Das B, Wang Y. Isometric pull-push strengths in workspace: 1. strength profiles. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 2004;10:43-58.

41. Fahal IH, Bell GM, Bone JM, Edwards RH. Physiological abnormalities of skeletal muscle in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1997;12:119-27.

42. Nilsen T, Hermann M, Eriksen CS, Dagfinrud H, Mowinckel P, Kjeken I. Grip force and pinch grip in an adult population: reference values and factors associated with grip force. Scand J Occup Ther 2012;19:288-96.

43. Ling L, Malmfred S, Thesleff P. Solid-sphere test for examination of anal sphincter strength. Scand J Gastroenterol 1984;19:960-4.

44. Xu HQ, Xue YT, Zhou ZJ, et al. Review of: Retentive capacity of power output and linear versus non-linear mapping of power loss in the isotonic muscular endurance test. Sci Rep 2021;11:22677.

45. Yap HK, Ng HY, Yeow C. High-force soft printable pneumatics for soft robotic applications. Soft Robot 2016;3:144-58.

46. Walpole SC, Prieto-Merino D, Edwards P, Cleland J, Stevens G, Roberts I. The weight of nations: an estimation of adult human biomass. BMC Public Health 2012;12:439.

47. Suulker C, Skach S, Althoefer K. A fabric soft robotic exoskeleton with novel elastic band integrated actuators for hand rehabilitation. arXiv. [Preprint.] Dec 14, 2022 [accessed 2024 Mar 27]. Available from:

48. Baeten J, Donné K, Boedrij S, Beckers W, Claesen E. Autonomous fruit picking machine: a robotic apple harvester. In: Laugier C, Siegwart R, editors. Field and service robotics. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 531-9.

49. Liu Z, Lu Z, Karydis K. SoRX: a soft pneumatic hexapedal robot to traverse rough, steep, and unstable terrain. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA);2020 May 31 - Aug 31; Paris, France. IEEE; 2020. pp. 420-6.

50. Hashem R, Stommel M, Cheng LK, Xu W. Design and characterization of a bellows-driven soft pneumatic actuator. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2021;26:2327-38.

51. Chen G, Lin T, Ding S, Chen S, Ji A, Lodewijks G. Design and test of an active pneumatic soft wrist for soft grippers. Actuators 2022;11:311.

52. Son H, Park Y, Na Y, Yoon C. 4D multiscale origami soft robots: a review. Polymers 2022;14:4235.

53. Ai C, Chen Y, Xu L, et al. Current development on origami/kirigami-inspired structure of creased patterns toward robotics. Adv Eng Mater 2021;23:2100473.

54. Jin L, Forte AE, Deng B, Rafsanjani A, Bertoldi K. Kirigami-inspired inflatables with programmable shapes. Adv Mater 2020;32:e2001863.

55. Melancon D, Gorissen B, García-Mora CJ, Hoberman C, Bertoldi K. Multistable inflatable origami structures at the metre scale. Nature 2021;592:545-50.

56. Melancon D, Forte AE, Kamp LM, Gorissen B, Bertoldi K. Inflatable origami: multimodal deformation via multistability. Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2201891.

57. Polygerinos P, Lyne S, Wang Z, et al. Towards a soft pneumatic glove for hand rehabilitation. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2013 Nov 3-7; Tokyo, Japan. IEEE; 2013. pp. 1512-7.

58. De Benedictis C, Franco W, Maffiodo D, Ferraresi C. Hand rehabilitation device actuated by a pneumatic muscle. In: Aspragathos N, Koustoumpardis P, Moulianitis V, editors. Advances in service and industrial robotics. Cham: Springer; 2019. pp. 102-11.

59. Raparelli T, Zobel PB, Durante F, Antonelli M, Raimondi P, Costanzo G. First clinical investigation on a pneumatic lumbar unloading orthosis. In: 2007 IEEE/ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering; 2007 May 23-27; Beijing, China. IEEE; 2007. pp. 1327-30.

60. Ahmadjou A, Sadeghi S, Zareinejad M, Talebi HA. A compact valveless pressure control source for soft rehabilitation glove. Int J Med Robot 2021;17:e2298.

61. Kim SJ, Chang H, Park J, Kim J. Design of a portable pneumatic power source with high output pressure for wearable robotic applications. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2018;3:4351-8.

62. Chun HTD, Roberts JO, Sayed ME, Aracri S, Stokes AA. Towards more energy efficient pneumatic soft actuators using a port-hamiltonian approach. In: 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft); 2019 Apr 14-18; Seoul, Korea (South). IEEE; 2019. pp. 277-82.

63. Gonzalez D, Garcia J, Voyles RM, Nawrocki RA, Newell B. Characterization of 3D printed pneumatic soft actuator. Sens Actuators A Phys 2022;334:113337.

64. Robertson MA, Sadeghi H, Florez JM, Paik J. Soft pneumatic actuator fascicles for high force and reliability. Soft Robot 2017;4:23-32.

65. Wilkening A, Mihajlov M, Ivlev O. Model-based pressure and torque control for innovative pneumatic soft-actuators. In: 7th International Fluid Power Conference. 2010. pp. 1-12. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024]

66. Breitman P, Matia Y, Gat AD. Fluid mechanics of pneumatic soft robots. Soft Robot 2021;8:519-30.

67. Wehner M, Tolley MT, Mengüç Y, et al. Pneumatic energy sources for autonomous and wearable soft robotics. Soft Robot 2014;1:263-74.

68. Niiyama R, Rus D, Kim S. Pouch motors: printable/inflatable soft actuators for robotics. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2014 May 31 - Jun 7; Hong Kong, China. IEEE; 2014. pp. 6332-7.

69. Diteesawat RS, Helps T, Taghavi M, Rossiter J. Electro-pneumatic pumps for soft robotics. Sci Robot 2021;6:eabc3721.

70. Wehner M, Truby RL, Fitzgerald DJ, et al. An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 2016;536:451-5.

71. Kim KR, Shin YJ, Kim KS, Kim S. Application of chemical reaction based pneumatic power generator to robot finger. In. 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2013 Nov 3-7; Tokyo, Japan. IEEE; 2013. pp. 4906-11.

72. Boyle R. A defence of the doctrine touching the spring and weight of the air propos’d by Mr. R. Boyle in his new physico-mechanical experiments, against the objections of Franciscus Linus; wherewith the objector’s funicular hypothesis is also examin’d, by the author of those experiments. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024]

73. Gay-Lussac LJ. The expansion of gases by heat. Available from: [Last accessed on 29 March 2024]

74. Avogadro A. Essay on a manner of determining the relative masses of the elementary molecules of bodies, and the proportions in which they enter into these compounds. 1811. Available from: [Last accessed on 29 March 2024]

75. Lee J, Yoon Y, Park H, et al. Bioinspired soft robotic fish for wireless underwater control of gliding locomotion. Adv Intell Syst 2022;4:2100271.

76. Silbey RJ, Alberty RA, Papadantonakis GA, Bawendi MG. Physical chemistry. John Wiley & Sons; 2022. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

77. Atkins P, Overton T, Rourke J, Weller M, Armstrong F. Shriver and Atkins’ inorganic chemistry. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from:,+Overton+T,+Rourke+J,+Weller+M,+Armstrong+F.+Shriver+and+Atkins%E2%80%99+inorganic+chemistry&ots=i47SGsARce&sig=-iOikgfZRVmAH2D04fTFWonHSFg. [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

78. Adami M, Seibel A. On-board pneumatic pressure generation methods for soft robotics applications. Actuators 2019;8:2.

79. Tolley MT, Shepherd RF, Mosadegh B, et al. A resilient, untethered soft robot. Soft Robot 2014;1:213-23.

80. Prince JC, Treviño C, Williams FA. A reduced reaction mechanism for the combustion of n-butane. Combust Flame 2017;175:27-33.

81. Warnatz J. The mechanism of high temperature combustion of propane and butane. Combust Sci Technol 1983;34:177-200.

82. Onal CD, Chen X, Whitesides GM, Rus D. Soft mobile robots with on-board chemical pressure generation. In: Christensen H, Khatib O, editors. Robotics research. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 525-40.

83. Goldfarb M, Barth E, Gogola M, Wehrmeyer J. Design and energetic characterization of a liquid-propellant-powered actuator for self-powered robots. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2003;8:254-62.

84. Okui M, Nagura Y, Iikawa S, Yamada Y, Nakamura T. A pneumatic power source using a sodium bicarbonate and citric acid reaction with pressure booster for use in mobile devices. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2017 Sep 24-28; Vancouver, BC, Canada. IEEE; 2017, pp. 1040-5.

85. Kitamori T, Wada A, Nabae H, Suzumori K. Untethered three-arm pneumatic robot using hose-free pneumatic actuator. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2016 Oct 9-14; Daejeon, Korea (South). IEEE; 2016, pp. 543-8.

86. Hosono M, Ino S, Sato M, Yamashita K, Izumi T. A system utilizing metal hydride actuators to achieve passive motion of toe joints for prevention of pressure ulcers: a pilot study. Rehabil Res Pract 2012;2012:541383.

87. Nishikawa Y, Matsumoto M. A design of fully soft robot actuated by gas-liquid phase change. Adv Robot 2019;33:567-75.

88. Shepherd RF, Stokes AA, Freake J, et al. Using explosions to power a soft robot. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013;52:2892-6.

89. Heisser RH, Aubin CA, Peretz O, et al. Valveless microliter combustion for densely packed arrays of powerful soft actuators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118:e2106553118.

90. Timm S, Mielewczik M, Florian A, et al. High-to-low CO2 acclimation reveals plasticity of the photorespiratory pathway and indicates regulatory links to cellular metabolism of Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2012;7:e42809.

91. Gilbert PUPA, Bergmann KD, Boekelheide N, et al. Biomineralization: integrating mechanism and evolutionary history. Sci Adv 2022;8:eabl9653.

92. Ciria-Recasens M, Blanch-Rubió J, Coll-Batet M, et al. Comparison of the effects of ossein-hydroxyapatite complex and calcium carbonate on bone metabolism in women with senile osteoporosis: a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, controlled, prospective study. Clin Drug Investig 2011;31:817-24.

94. Mumallah NA. Factors influencing the reaction rate of hydrochloric acid and carbonate rock. In: the SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Anaheim, California, February 1991. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024]

95. Bischoff KB. Effectiveness factors for general reaction rate forms. Aiche J 1965;11:351-5.

96. Doménech P, Pogrebnyakov I, Nielsen AT, Riisager A. Catalytic production of long-chain hydrocarbons suitable for jet-fuel use from fermentation-derived oxygenates. Green Chem 2022;24:3461-74.

97. Wang S, Zhang T, Bao M, Su H, Xu P. Microbial production of hydrogen by mixed culture technologies: a review. Biotechnol J 2020;15:e1900297.

98. Soccol CR, Pandey A, Larroche C. Fermentation processes engineering in the food industry. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2013, pp. 1-464.

99. Dagle VL, Smith C, Flake M, et al. Integrated process for the catalytic conversion of biomass-derived syngas into transportation fuels. Green Chem 2016;18:1880-91.

100. Chakik FE, Kaddami M, Mikou M. Effect of operating parameters on hydrogen production by electrolysis of water. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:25550-7.

101. Symons MCR. 809. The mechanism of decomposition of potassium permanganate in alkaline solution and its bearing on oxidation by this reagent. J Chem Soc 1953:3956-61.

102. Janudin N, Kasim NAM, Knight VF, et al. Sensing techniques on determination of chlorine gas and free chlorine in water. J Sensors 2022;2022:1898417.

103. Atkins P. Reactions: the private life of atoms. Oxford Academic; 2011. pp. 191.

104. Giaretta JE, Duan H, Oveissi F, Farajikhah S, Dehghani F, Naficy S. Flexible sensors for hydrogen peroxide detection: a critical review. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2022;14:20491-505.

105. Hu L, Tao K, Miao J, Grüber G. Hydrogen-peroxide-fuelled platinum-nickel-SU-8 microrocket with steerable propulsion using an eccentric nanoengine. RSC Adv 2016;6:102513-8.

106. Kopacz W, Okninski A, Kasztankiewicz A, Nowakowski P, Rarata G, Maksimowski P. Hydrogen peroxide - a promising oxidizer for rocket propulsion and its application in solid rocket propellants. FirePhysChem 2022;2:56-66.

107. Castillo E, Vilke G. Road traffic accidents: air bag-related injuries and deaths. encyclopedia of forensic and legal medicine. Elsevier; 2016. pp. 162-74.

108. Oxtoby DW, Gillis HP, Butler LJ. Principles of modern chemistry. 8th ed. Cengage Learning; 2016. pp. 993. Available from:,+Gillis+HP,+Butler+LJ.+Principles+of+Modern+Chemistry&ots=16S2ZBOdDy&sig=oapaY9RHEUzsBEcv5MhBKiaAVDA#v=onepage&q&f=false. [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

109. Miriyev A, Stack K, Lipson H. Soft material for soft actuators. Nat Commun 2017;8:596.

110. Mehmandoust B, Sanjari E, Vatani M. An efficient reliable method to estimate the vaporization enthalpy of pure substances according to the normal boiling temperature and critical properties. J Adv Res 2014;5:261-9.

111. Cheng P, Ye Y, Jia J, Wu C, Xie Q. Design of cylindrical soft vacuum actuator for soft robots. Smart Mater Struct 2021;30:045020.

112. Miyazaki H, Uozaki H, Tojo A, et al. Application of low-vacuum scanning electron microscopy for renal biopsy specimens. Pathol Res Pract 2012;208:503-9.

113. Tawk C, In Het Panhuis M, Spinks GM, Alici G. Bioinspired 3D printable soft vacuum actuators for locomotion robots, grippers and artificial muscles. Soft Robot 2018;5:685-94.

114. Yang D, Verma MS, Lossner E, Stothers D, Whitesides GM. Negative-pressure soft linear actuator with a mechanical advantage. Adv Mater Technol 2017;2:1600164.

115. Fatahillah M, Oh N, Rodrigue H. A novel soft bending actuator using combined positive and negative pressures. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020;8:472.

116. Tawk C, Alici G. A review of 3D-printable soft pneumatic actuators and sensors: research challenges and opportunities. Adv Intell Syst 2021;3:2000223.

117. Pitzer KS. Thermodynamics of electrolytes. I. Theoretical basis and general equations. J Phys Chem 1973;77:268-77.

118. Tortolero-Langarica JJA, Rodríguez-Troncoso AP, Cupul-Magaña AL, Morales-de-Anda DE, Caselle JE, Carricart-Ganivet JP. Coral calcification and carbonate production in the eastern tropical Pacific: the role of branching and massive corals in the reef maintenance. Geobiology 2022;20:533-45.

119. Carlot J, Kayal M, Lenihan HS, et al. Juvenile corals underpin coral reef carbonate production after disturbance. Glob Chang Biol 2021;27:2623-32.

120. Wu S, Baker GL, Yin J, Zhu Y. Fast thermal actuators for soft robotics. Soft Robot 2022;9:1031-9.

121. Benard J. The oxidation of metals and alloys. Metall Rev 1964;9:473-503.

122. Kofstad P. Oxidation of metals: determination of activation energies. Nature 1957;179:1362-3.

123. Khanna AS. Chapter 6 - High temperature oxidation. Handbook of environmental degradation of materials. Elsevier; 2005. pp. 105-52.

124. Young DJ. High temperature oxidation and corrosion of metals. 1st ed. Elsevier; 2008, pp. 593. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

125. Shemet V, Pomytkin A, Neshpor V. High-temperature oxidation behaviour of carbon materials in air. Carbon 1993;31:1-6.

126. Nagai T, Kurita A, Shintake J. Characterization of sustainable robotic materials and finite element analysis of soft actuators under biodegradation. Front Robot AI 2021;8:760485.

127. Laschi C, Mazzolai B. Bioinspired materials and approaches for soft robotics. MRS Bulletin 2021;46:345-9.

128. Leigh GJ. Haber-bosch and other industrial processes. In: Smith BE, Richards RL, Newton WE, editors. Catalysts for nitrogen fixation. Dordrecht,Netherlands: Springer; 2004. pp. 33-54.

129. Bullock RM. Catalysis without precious metals. Wiley; 2010.

131. Ottaway MR, Coates CF, Haines PJ, Skinner GA. The use of thermal methods in assessing the hazards and safety of chemical reactions. Anal Proc 1986;23:116.

132. Etchells JC; Principal Specialist Inspector. The protection of reactors containing exothermic reactions: an HSE view. 1994. pp. 377-84. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

133. Halliwell B, Adhikary A, Dingfelder M, Dizdaroglu M. Hydroxyl radical is a significant player in oxidative DNA damage in vivo. Chem Soc Rev 2021;50:8355-60.

134. Taylor CJ, Pomberger A, Felton KC, et al. A brief introduction to chemical reaction optimization. Chem Rev 2023;123:3089-126.

135. Stoessel F. Thermal safety of chemical processes: risk assessment and process design. Wiley; 2008. pp. 1-374.

136. Brent J, Burkhart K, Dargan P, et al. Critical care toxicology: diagnosis and management of the critically poisoned patient. Springer; 2017. pp. 1-3058.

137. Shepherd RF, Ilievski F, Choi W, et al. Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:20400-3.

138. Joshi S, Paik J. Pneumatic supply system parameter optimization for soft actuators. Soft Robot 2021;8:152-63.

139. Soft robotics toolkit. Modeling and design tool for soft pneumatic actuators. Available from: [Last accessed on 27 March 2024].

140. Mourad AA, Mohammad AF, Al-marzouqi AH, El-naas MH, Al-marzouqi MH, Altarawneh M. CO2 capture and ions removal through reaction with potassium hydroxide in desalination reject brine: Statistical optimization. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 2022;170:108722.

141. Ho H, Iizuka A. Mineral carbonation using seawater for CO2 sequestration and utilization: a review. Sep Purif Technol 2023;307:122855.

142. Kucka L, Kenig EY, Górak A. Kinetics of the gas - liquid reaction between carbon dioxide and hydroxide ions. Ind Eng Chem Res 2002;41:5952-7.

143. Rajappan A, Jumet B, Preston DJ. Pneumatic soft robots take a step toward autonomy. Sci Robot 2021;6:eabg6994.

144. Drotman D, Jadhav S, Sharp D, Chan C, Tolley MT. Electronics-free pneumatic circuits for controlling soft-legged robots. Sci Robot 2021;6:eaay2627.

145. Mosadegh B, Kuo CH, Tung YC, et al. Integrated elastomeric components for autonomous regulation of sequential and oscillatory flow switching in microfluidic devices. Nat Phys 2010;6:433-7.

146. Mosadegh B, Polygerinos P, Keplinger C, et al. Pneumatic networks for soft robotics that actuate rapidly. Adv Funct Mater 2014;24:2163-70.

147. Su M, Xie R, Zhang Y, et al. Pneumatic soft actuator with anisotropic soft and rigid restraints for pure in-plane bending motion. Appl Sci 2019;9:2999.

148. Gorissen B, Melancon D, Vasios N, Torbati M, Bertoldi K. Inflatable soft jumper inspired by shell snapping. Sci Robot 2020;5:eabb1967.

149. Rothemund P, Ainla A, Belding L, et al. A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators. Sci Robot 2018;3:eaar7986.

150. Philamore H, Rossiter J, Stinchcombe A, Ieropoulos I. Row-bot: an energetically autonomous artificial water boatman. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2015 Sep 28 - Oct 2; Hamburg, Germany. IEEE; 2015. pp. 3888-93.

151. Girabawe C, Fraden S. An image-driven drop-on-demand system. Sens Actuators B Chem 2017;238:532-9.

152. Sitti M, Ceylan H, Hu W, et al. Biomedical applications of untethered mobile milli/microrobots. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2015;103:205-24.

153. Kim S, Laschi C, Trimmer B. Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol 2013;31:287-94.

154. Zhang C, Zhu P, Lin Y, Jiao Z, Zou J. Modular soft robotics: modular units, connection mechanisms, and applications. Adv Intell Syst 2020;2:1900166.

155. Arnaboldi S, Salinas G, Bichon S, Gounel S, Mano N, Kuhn A. Bi-enzymatic chemo-mechanical feedback loop for continuous self-sustained actuation of conducting polymers. Nat Commun 2023;14:6390.

156. Yang X, Chang L, Pérez-Arancibia NO. An 88-milligram insect-scale autonomous crawling robot driven by a catalytic artificial muscle. Sci Robot 2020;5:eaba0015.

157. Chen S, Cao Y, Sarparast M, et al. Soft crawling robots: design, actuation, and locomotion. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:1900837.

158. Sarikaya S, Gardea F, Auletta JT, et al. Fuel-driven redox reactions in electrolyte-free polymer actuators for soft robotics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:31803-11.

159. Mangadlao JD, Xu H, Baer E, Advincula RC. In situ photogeneration of palladium nanoparticles in thermoplastic polyurethane: photopatterning and enhanced oxygen barrier property. Macro Chem Phys 2017;218:1700289.

160. Storck S, Bretinger H, Maier WF. Characterization of micro- and mesoporous solids by physisorption methods and pore-size analysis. Appl Catal A Gen 1998;174:137-46.

161. Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013;341:1230444.

162. Kelly JA, Giese M, Shopsowitz KE, Hamad WY, MacLachlan MJ. The development of chiral nematic mesoporous materials. Acc Chem Res 2014;47:1088-96.

163. Wang H, Yuan X, Wu Y, et al. Synthesis and applications of novel graphitic carbon nitride/metal-organic frameworks mesoporous photocatalyst for dyes removal. Appl Catal B Environ 2015;174-5:445-54.

164. Narzary BB, Baker BC, Yadav N, D’elia V, Faul CFJ. Crosslinked porous polyimides: structure, properties and applications. Polym Chem 2021;12:6494-514.

165. Narzary BB, Baker BC, Faul CFJ. Selective CO2 electroreduction from tuneable naphthalene-based porous polyimide networks. Adv Mater 2023;35:e2211795.

166. Giri N, Del Pópolo MG, Melaugh G, et al. Liquids with permanent porosity. Nature 2015;527:216-20.

167. Fulvio PF, Dai S. Porous liquids: the next frontier. Chem 2020;6:3263-87.

168. Gronnow MJ, White RJ, Clark JH, Macquarrie DJ. Energy efficiency in chemical reactions:  a comparative study of different reaction techniques. Org Process Res Dev 2005;9:516-8.

169. Xavier MS, Tawk CD, Zolfagharian A, et al. Soft pneumatic actuators: a review of design, fabrication, modeling, sensing, control and applications. IEEE Access 2022;10:59442-85.

170. Dezaki M, Bodaghi M, Serjouei A, Afazov S, Zolfagharian A. Soft pneumatic actuators with controllable stiffness by bio-inspired lattice chambers and fused deposition modeling 3D printing. Adv Eng Mater 2023;25:2200797.

171. Yadav T, Mishra G. Insect toxins and their bioprospecting. In: Omkar, editor. Insects as service providers. Singapore: Springer; 2023. pp. 131-62.

172. Arndt EM, Moore W, Lee WK, Ortiz C. Biomechanics. Mechanistic origins of bombardier beetle (Brachinini) explosion-induced defensive spray pulsation. Science 2015;348:563-7.

173. Terryn S, Brancart J, Lefeber D, Van Assche G, Vanderborght B. Self-healing soft pneumatic robots. Sci Robot 2017;2:eaan4268.

Cite This Article

Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS

OAE Style

Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC, Romero C, Rossiter JM, Faul CFJ. Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation. Soft Sci 2024;4:14.

AMA Style

Villeda-Hernandez M, Baker BC, Romero C, Rossiter JM, Faul CFJ. Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation. Soft Science. 2024; 4(2): 14.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Villeda-Hernandez, Marcos, Benjamin C. Baker, Christian Romero, Jonathan M. Rossiter, Charl FJ. Faul. 2024. "Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation" Soft Science. 4, no.2: 14.

ACS Style

Villeda-Hernandez, M.; Baker BC.; Romero C.; Rossiter JM.; Faul CFJ. Soft alchemy: a comprehensive guide to chemical reactions for pneumatic soft actuation. Soft. Sci. 2024, 4, 14.

About This Article

Special Issue

This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-inspired Soft Robotics
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments




Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at

Download PDF
Cite This Article 3 clicks
Like This Article 3 likes
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Soft Science
ISSN 2769-5441 (Online)
Follow Us


All published articles are preserved here permanently:


All published articles are preserved here permanently: