REFERENCES
1. Woods GA, Rommelfanger NJ, Hong G. Bioinspired materials for in vivo bioelectronic neural interfaces. Matter. 2020;3:1087-113.
2. Song E, Li J, Rogers JA. Barrier materials for flexible bioelectronic implants with chronic stability - current approaches and future directions. APL Mater. 2019;7:050902.
3. Song E, Li J, Won SM, Bai W, Rogers JA. Materials for flexible bioelectronic systems as chronic neural interfaces. Nat Mater. 2020;19:590-603.
4. Kim DH, Viventi J, Amsden JJ, et al. Dissolvable films of silk fibroin for ultrathin conformal bio-integrated electronics. Nature Mater. 2010;9:511-7.
5. Ressler KJ, Mayberg HS. Targeting abnormal neural circuits in mood and anxiety disorders: from the laboratory to the clinic. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1116-24.
6. Wells JD, Kao C, Jansen ED, Konrad PE, Mahadevan-Jansen A. Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10:064003.
7. Legon W, Sato TF, Opitz A, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:322-9.
8. Liang L, Liu C, Cai P, et al. Highly specific differentiation of MSCs into neurons directed by local electrical stimuli triggered wirelessly by electromagnetic induction nanogenerator. Nano Energy. 2022;100:107483.
9. Palanker D, Vankov A, Huie P, Baccus S. Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis. J Neural Eng. 2005;2:S105-20.
10. Zhang T, Liang H, Wang Z, et al. Piezoelectric ultrasound energy - harvesting device for deep brain stimulation and analgesia applications. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabk0159.
11. Bonmassar G, Lee SW, Freeman DK, Polasek M, Fried SI, Gale JT. Microscopic magnetic stimulation of neural tissue. Nat Commun. 2012;3:921.
12. Rand D, Jakešová M, Lubin G, et al. Direct electrical neurostimulation with organic pigment photocapacitors. Adv Mater. 2018;30:1707292.
13. Jiang Y, Huang Y, Luo X, et al. Neural stimulation in vitro and in vivo by photoacoustic nanotransducers. Matter. 2021;4:654-74.
15. Schwalb JM, Hamani C. The history and future of deep brain stimulation. Neurotherapeutics. 2008;5:3-13.
16. Kellaway P. The part played by electric fish in the early history of bioelectricity and electrotherapy. Bull Hist Med. 1946;20:112-137.
17. Sackeim HA. Modern electroconvulsive therapy: vastly improved yet greatly underused. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:779-80.
18. Benabid AL, Pollak P, Louveau A, Henry S, de Rougemont J. Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral parkinson disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1987;50:344-6.
20. Elkin BS, Ilankovan A, Morrison B III. Age-dependent regional mechanical properties of the rat hippocampus and cortex. J Biomech Eng. 2010;132:011010.
22. Lai HY, Liao LD, Lin CT, et al. Design, simulation and experimental validation of a novel flexible neural probe for deep brain stimulation and multichannel recording. J Neural Eng. 2012;9:036001.
23. Wurth S, Capogrosso M, Raspopovic S, et al. Long-term usability and bio-integration of polyimide-based intra-neural stimulating electrodes. Biomaterials. 2017;122:114-29.
24. Fujie T, Ahadian S, Liu H, et al. Engineered nanomembranes for directing cellular organization toward flexible biodevices. Nano Lett. 2013;13:3185-92.
25. Xiang Z, Yen S, Xue N, et al. Ultra-thin flexible polyimide neural probe embedded in a dissolvable maltose-coated microneedle. J Micromech Microeng. 2014;24:065015.
26. Minev IR, Musienko P, Hirsch A, et al. Electronic dura mater for long-term multimodal neural interfaces. Science. 2015;347:159-63.
27. Zhu M, Wang H, Li S, et al. Flexible electrodes for in vivo and in vitro electrophysiological signal recording. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2100646.
28. David-Pur M, Bareket-Keren L, Beit-Yaakov G, Raz-Prag D, Hanein Y. All-carbon-nanotube flexible multi-electrode array for neuronal recording and stimulation. Biomed Microdevices. 2014;16:43-53.
29. Vitale F, Summerson SR, Aazhang B, Kemere C, Pasquali M. Neural stimulation and recording with bidirectional, soft carbon nanotube fiber microelectrodes. ACS Nano. 2015;9:4465-74.
30. Mccallum GA, Sui X, Qiu C, et al. Chronic interfacing with the autonomic nervous system using carbon nanotube (CNT) yarn electrodes. Sci Rep. 2017;7:11723.
31. Tang R, Zhang C, Liu B, et al. Towards an artificial peripheral nerve: liquid metal-based fluidic cuff electrodes for long-term nerve stimulation and recording. Biosens Bioelectron. 2022;216:114600.
32. Fan X, Chen Z, Sun H, Zeng S, Liu R, Tian Y. Polyelectrolyte-based conductive hydrogels: from theory to applications. Soft Sci. 2022;2:10.
33. Cong Y, Fu J. Hydrogel - tissue interface interactions for implantable flexible bioelectronics. Langmuir. 2022;38:11503-13.
34. Kim SD, Park K, Lee S, et al. Injectable and tissue-conformable conductive hydrogel for MRI-compatible brain-interfacing electrodes. Soft Sci. 2023;3:18.
35. Zhang J, Wang L, Xue Y, et al. Engineering electrodes with robust conducting hydrogel coating for neural recording and modulation. Adv Mater. 2023;35:2209324.
36. Nguyen TK, Barton M, Ashok A, et al. Wide bandgap semiconductor nanomembranes as a long-term biointerface for flexible, implanted neuromodulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119:e2203287119.
37. Lin JC. A new IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio-frequency radiation. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag. 2006;48:157-9.
38. Fotopoulou K, Flynn BW. Wireless power transfer in loosely coupled links: coil misalignment model. IEEE Trans Magn. 2011;47:416-30.
39. Freeman DK, O’brien JM, Kumar P, et al. A sub-millimeter, inductively powered neural stimulator. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:659.
40. Maeng LY, Murillo MF, Mu M, et al. Behavioral validation of a wireless low-power neurostimulation technology in a conditioned place preference task. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:026022.
41. Singer A, Dutta S, Lewis E, et al. Magnetoelectric materials for miniature, wireless neural stimulation at therapeutic frequencies. Neuron. 2020;107:631-43.e5.
42. Yu Z, Chen JC, Alrashdan FT, et al. MagNI: a magnetoelectrically powered and controlled wireless neurostimulating implant. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2020;14:1241-52.
43. Chen JC, Kan P, Yu Z, et al. A wireless millimetric magnetoelectric implant for the endovascular stimulation of peripheral nerves. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6:706-16.
44. Guduru R, Liang P, Hong J, et al. Magnetoelectric ‘spin’ on stimulating the brain. Nanomedicine. 2015;10:2051-61.
45. Kozielski KL, Jahanshahi A, Gilbert HB, et al. Nonresonant powering of injectable nanoelectrodes enables wireless deep brain stimulation in freely moving mice. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabc4189.
46. Han F, Ma X, Zhai Y, et al. Strategy for designing a cell scaffold to enable wireless electrical stimulation for enhanced neuronal differentiation of stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2100027.
47. Tang B, Zhuang J, Wang L, et al. Harnessing cell dynamic responses on magnetoelectric nanocomposite films to promote osteogenic differentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:7841-51.
48. Zhang Y, Chen S, Xiao Z, et al. Magnetoelectric nanoparticles incorporated biomimetic matrix for wireless electrical stimulation and nerve regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10:2100695.
49. Qi F, Gao X, Shuai Y, et al. Magnetic-driven wireless electrical stimulation in a scaffold. Compos B Eng. 2022;237:109864.
50. Goetz G, Palanker D, Cizmar T. Holographic display system for photovoltaic retinal prosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54:352. Available from: https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2148311. [Last accessed on 27 Nov 2023]
51. Chen ZC, Wang B, Bhuckory MB, et al. Optically configurable confinement of electric field with photovoltaic retinal prosthesis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021;62:3166. Available from: https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2776270. [Last accessed on 27 Nov 2023]
52. Chenais NAL, Airaghi Leccardi MJI, Ghezzi D. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis restores high-resolution responses to single-pixel stimulation in blind retinas. Commun Mater. 2021;2:28.
53. Loudin JD, Simanovskii DM, Vijayraghavan K, et al. Optoelectronic retinal prosthesis: system design and performance. J Neural Eng. 2007;4:S72.
54. Mathieson K, Loudin J, Goetz G, et al. Photovoltaic retinal prosthesis with high pixel density. Nature Photon. 2012;6:391-7.
55. Boinagrov D, Lei X, Goetz G, et al. Photovoltaic pixels for neural stimulation: circuit models and performance. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2016;10:85-97.
56. Lei X, Huang TW, Flores TA, et al. Photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis with pixel sizes down to 40 um. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017;58:4269. Available from: https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2641379. [Last accessed on 27 Nov 2023]
57. Bhuckory MB, Chen ZC, Shin A, et al. 3-dimensional subretinal prosthesis with single-cell resolution. Invest Ophthalmol Vi Sci 2022;63:4516-F0303. Available from: https://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2782016. [Last accessed on 27 Nov 2023]
58. Wang BY, Chen ZC, Bhuckory M, et al. Electronic photoreceptors enable prosthetic visual acuity matching the natural resolution in rats. Nat Commun. 2022;13:6627.
59. Silverå Ejneby M, Migliaccio L, Gicevičius M, et al. Extracellular photovoltage clamp using conducting polymer-modified organic photocapacitors. Adv Mater Technol. 2020;5:1900860.
60. Silverå Ejneby M, Jakešová M, Ferrero JJ, et al. Chronic electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves via deep-red light transduced by an implanted organic photocapacitor. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6:741-53.
61. Menz MD, Oralkan O, Khuri-Yakub PT, Baccus SA. Precise neural stimulation in the retina using focused ultrasound. J Neurosci. 2013;33:4550-60.
62. Seo D, Neely RM, Shen K, et al. Wireless recording in the peripheral nervous system with ultrasonic neural dust. Neuron. 2016;91:529-39.
63. Marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/71100/download. [Last accessed on 27 Nov 2023].
64. Wang X, Song J, Liu J, Wang ZL. Direct-current nanogenerator driven by ultrasonic waves. Science. 2007;316:102-5.
65. Ciofani G, Danti S, D’Alessandro D, et al. Enhancement of neurite outgrowth in neuronal-like cells following boron nitride nanotube-mediated stimulation. ACS Nano. 2010;4:6267-77.
66. Marino A, Arai S, Hou Y, et al. Piezoelectric nanoparticle-assisted wireless neuronal stimulation. ACS Nano. 2015;9:7678-89.
67. Piech DK, Johnson BC, Shen K, et al. A wireless millimetre-scale implantable neural stimulator with ultrasonically powered bidirectional communication. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4:207-22.
68. Shi Q, Wang T, Lee C. MEMS based broadband piezoelectric ultrasonic energy harvester (PUEH) for enabling self-powered implantable biomedical devices. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24946.
69. Yang Z, Zeng D, Wang H, Zhao C, Tan J. Harvesting ultrasonic energy using 1-3 piezoelectric composites. Smart Mater Struct. 2015;24:075029.
70. Jiang L, Yang Y, Chen R, et al. Flexible piezoelectric ultrasonic energy harvester array for bio-implantable wireless generator. Nano Energy. 2019;56:216-24.
71. Jiang L, Yang Y, Chen R, et al. Ultrasound-induced wireless energy harvesting for potential retinal electrical stimulation application. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1902522.
72. Jiang L, Lu G, Zeng Y, et al. Flexible ultrasound-induced retinal stimulating piezo-arrays for biomimetic visual prostheses. Nat Commun. 2022;13:3853.
73. Jiang L, Lu G, Yang Y, et al. Photoacoustic and piezo-ultrasound hybrid-induced energy transfer for 3D twining wireless multifunctional implants. Energy Environ Sci. 2021;14:1490-505.
74. Chen P, Wu P, Wan X, et al. Ultrasound-driven electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves based on implantable piezoelectric thin film nanogenerators. Nano Energy. 2021;86:106123.
75. Das R, Curry EJ, Le TT, et al. Biodegradable nanofiber bone-tissue scaffold as remotely-controlled and self-powering electrical stimulator. Nano Energy. 2020;76:105028.
76. Chen P, Wang Q, Wan X, et al. Wireless electrical stimulation of the vagus nerves by ultrasound-responsive programmable hydrogel nanogenerators for anti-inflammatory therapy in sepsis. Nano Energy. 2021;89:106327.
77. Xu Z, Wan X, Mo X, et al. Electrostatic assembly of laminated transparent piezoelectrets for epidermal and implantable electronics. Nano Energy. 2021;89:106450.
78. Wan X, Chen P, Xu Z, et al. Hybrid-piezoelectret based highly efficient ultrasonic energy harvester for implantable electronics. Adv Funct Mater. 2022;32:2200589.
79. Tofts PS. The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. Phys Med Biol. 1990;35:1119-28.
80. Bagherzadeh H, Meng Q, Lu H, Hong E, Yang Y, Choa FS. High-performance magnetic-core coils for targeted rodent brain stimulations. BME Front. 2022;2022:9854846.
81. Klomjai W, Katz R, Lackmy-Vallée A. Basic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;58:208-13.
82. Deng ZD, Lisanby SH, Peterchev AV. Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs. Brain Stimul. 2013;6:1-13.
83. Roth Y, Amir A, Levkovitz Y, Zangen A. Three-dimensional distribution of the electric field induced in the brain by transcranial magnetic stimulation using figure-8 and deep H-coils. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;24:31-8.
84. Wilson SA, Day BL, Thickbroom GW, Mastaglia FL. Spatial differences in the sites of direct and indirect activation of corticospinal neurones by magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101:255-61.
85. Di Lazzaro V, Oliviero A, Meglio M, et al. Direct demonstration of the effect of lorazepam on the excitability of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:794-9.
86. Pascual-Leone A, Valls-Solé J, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. Brain. 1994;117:847-58.
87. Chen R, Classen J, Gerloff C, et al. Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology. 1997;48:1398-403.
88. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005;45:201-6.
89. Hamada M, Hanajima R, Terao Y, et al. Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118:2672-82.
90. Khedr EM, Gilio F, Rothwell J. Effects of low frequency and low intensity repetitive paired pulse stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115:1259-63.
91. Park HJ, Bonmassar G, Kaltenbach JA, Machado AG, Manzoor NF, Gale JT. Activation of the central nervous system induced by micro-magnetic stimulation. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2463.
92. Khalifa A, Zaeimbashi M, Zhou TX, et al. The development of microfabricated solenoids with magnetic cores for micromagnetic neural stimulation. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2021;7:91.
93. Boyden ES, Zhang F, Bamberg E, Nagel G, Deisseroth K. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:1263-8.
94. Yang Y, Wu M, Vázquez-Guardado A, et al. Wireless multilateral devices for optogenetic studies of individual and social behaviors. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:1035-45.
95. Rajalingham R, Sorenson M, Azadi R, Bohn S, DiCarlo JJ, Afraz A. Chronically implantable LED arrays for behavioral optogenetics in primates. Nat Methods. 2021;18:1112-6.
96. Wells J, Kao C, Mariappan K, et al. Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. Opt Lett. 2005;30:504-6.
97. Wu X, Jiang Y, Rommelfanger NJ, et al. Tether-free photothermal deep-brain stimulation in freely behaving mice via wide-field illumination in the near-infrared-II window. Nat Biomed Eng. 2022;6:754-70.
98. Harvey EN. The effect of high frequency sound waves on heart muscle and other irritable tissues. Am J Physiol. 1929;91:284-90.
99. Tufail Y, Matyushov A, Baldwin N, et al. Transcranial pulsed ultrasound stimulates intact brain circuits. Neuron. 2010;66:681-94.
100. Yoo SS, Bystritsky A, Lee JH, et al. Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity. Neuroimage. 2011;56:1267-75.
101. Lee W, Lee SD, Park MY, et al. Image-guided focused ultrasound-mediated regional brain stimulation in sheep. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:459-70.
102. Dallapiazza RF, Timbie KF, Holmberg S, et al. Noninvasive neuromodulation and thalamic mapping with low-intensity focused ultrasound. J Neurosurg. 2018;128:875-84.
103. Deffieux T, Younan Y, Wattiez N, Tanter M, Pouget P, Aubry JF. Low-intensity focused ultrasound modulates monkey visuomotor behavior. Curr Biol. 2013;23:2430-3.
104. Legon W, Bansal P, Tyshynsky R, Ai L, Mueller JK. Transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation of the human primary motor cortex. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10007.
105. Panczykowski DM, Monaco EA III, Friedlander RM. Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:N8-9.
106. Zhang F, Aravanis AM, Adamantidis A, de Lecea L, Deisseroth K. Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8:577-81.
107. Wagner T, Valero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2007;9:527-65.
109. Dinno MA, Dyson M, Young SR, Mortimer AJ, Hart J, Crum LA. The significance of membrane changes in the safe and effective use of therapeutic and diagnostic ultrasound. Phys Med Biol. 1989;34:1543-52.
110. Ye J, Tang S, Meng L, et al. Ultrasonic control of neural activity through activation of the mechanosensitive channel MscL. Nano Lett. 2018;18:4148-55.
111. Li J, Ma Y, Zhang T, Shung KK, Zhu B. Recent advancements in ultrasound transducer: from material strategies to biomedical applications. BME Front. 2022;2022:9764501.
112. Qian X, Lu G, Thomas BB, et al. Noninvasive ultrasound retinal stimulation for vision restoration at high spatiotemporal resolution. BME Front. 2022;2022:9829316.
113. Zhang T, Wang Z, Liang H, et al. Transcranial focused ultrasound stimulation of periaqueductal gray for analgesia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2022;69:3155-62.
114. Kook G, Jo Y, Oh C, et al. Multifocal skull-compensated transcranial focused ultrasound system for neuromodulation applications based on acoustic holography. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023;9:45.
115. Jiang Y, Lee HJ, Lan L, et al. Optoacoustic brain stimulation at submillimeter spatial precision. Nat Commun. 2020;11:881.
116. Shi L, Jiang Y, Fernandez FR, et al. Non-genetic photoacoustic stimulation of single neurons by a tapered fiber optoacoustic emitter. Light Sci Appl. 2021;10:143.
