## Article

# Uncovering isolated resonant responses in antagonistic pure-shear dielectric elastomer actuators

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}Department of Mechanical Engineering,

^{4}

Correspondence Address: Dr. Xing Gao, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (SIAT), Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1068 Xueyuan Road Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, China. E-mail:

**Received:**31 Mar 2021 |

**First Decision:**30 Apr 2021 |

**Revised:**2 May 2021 |

**Accepted:**21 May 2021 |

**First online:**21 May 2021

**Academic Editor:**Zhifeng Ren |

**Copy Editor:**Yue-Yue Zhang |

**Production Editor:**Yue-Yue Zhang

**Open Access**This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

## Abstract

The dielectric elastomer actuator (DEA) is one type of emerging soft actuator that has the attractive features of large actuation strains, high energy density, and inherent compliance, which is desirable for novel bio-inspired and soft robotic applications. Due to their inherent elasticity, when stimulated by an alternating current voltage with a frequency matching the natural frequency of the DEA system, the DEAs can exhibit resonant responses which maximize the oscillation amplitude. Silicone elastomers are widely utilized for resonant actuation applications for their reduced viscous damping hence better dynamic performance compared to VHB elastomers. However, the low pre-stretch ratios adopted by silicone elastomers could induce loss-of-tension of the mem-branes in high amplitude oscillations, yet its effects on the dynamic responses of a DEA are not fully understood. By using a numerical dynamic model, this work studies the effects of the loss-of-tension on the frequency response of the antagonistic pure-shear DEAs. A subharmonic frequency response curve isolated from the main response branch is uncovered for the first time in a parametrically forced DEA system, which causes a sudden jump in the oscillation amplitude and serves as a severe threat to the dynamic stability and controllability of the DEA system. By using a global analysis method, the evolution of the isolated response curve against the excitation components and system physical parameters is also investigated numerically.

## Keywords

*,*pure-shear configuration

*,*nonlinear dynamics

*,*isolated response curve

*,*soft oscillator

## Introduction

Dielectric elastomer actuators (DEAs) are an emerging type of soft actuator that possess several advantages over conventional actuators in terms of large actuation strain, high theoretical efficiency, inherent compliance, and low cost^{[1,2]}. An idealized DEA consists of two pieces of compliant electrodes with one layer of dielectric elastomer in between. When a voltage is applied across the electrodes, opposing charges are accumulated on the two sides of the membrane, which cause it to contract in thickness and expand in area. Many configurations of DEAs have been proposed; for instance, stacked DEAs^{[3]}, conical DEAs^{[4,5]}, rolled DEAs^{[6,7]}, and the dielectric elastomer minimum energy structures^{[8,9]}. Many robotic applications based on DEAs have been developed in soft robotic locomotion^{[10-16]}, fluidic pumps^{[17,18]}, and grippers^{[19,20]}.

Pure-shear DEAs represent one class of planar and linear DE actuation system that utilizes the active area expansion of the membrane in one planar direction as the output. Such a design has a compact configuration which is desirable for many applications in robotics such as a flexible morphing wing^{[21]}, a vibration shaker^{[22]}, and a fishlike airship^{[23]}. In order to maintain the tension on the membrane, one end of it is usually fixed while the opposing end is typically attached to a biasing mass^{[24-26]} or an equivalent force^{[27]}, a spring^{[28-30]}, an antagonistic pure-shear DEA^{[31,32]}, or a bistable mechanism^{[33,34]}.

Large actuation strains of the DEAs can reduce the system complexity and robot size (i.e., no strain amplification mechanism required) and also increase the range of motion of the robot designs. Hence, several works have focused on optimizing the quasi-static linear actuation strains of the pure-shear DEAs. Lu *et al*.^{[35]} utilized the anisotropic pre-stretch and stiff fiber constraints to achieve an output strain up to 142%. By using the same anisotropic pre-stretch principle and adding an optimal mass to the membrane, a maximum actuation strain over 500% was documented by Goh *et al*.^{[26]}.

Due to the inherent elasticity, when stimulated by an alternating current (AC) voltage signal, the DEAs can generate oscillatory motions. As the excitation frequency approaches the natural frequency of the DEA system, it can exhibit a dramatic increase in its oscillation amplitude. This soft oscillation technology can have advantages over other conventional rigid mechanical oscillators in terms of inherent compliance, which can be readily integrated with soft robotic systems to allow active vibration control and dynamic robotic locomotion^{[36]}. As a result, more works have been concerned with the nonlinear dynamics of the pure-shear DEAs.

For example, Li *et al*.^{[37]} have extensively investigated the nonlinear dynamics of pure-shear DEAs with specific focus on the effects of biasing elements, membrane strain-stiffing^{[29]}, and the viscosity-induced drifting^{[38]}. Zhang *et al*.^{[27,39]} studied the effects of dissipating factors of a pure-shear DEA (viscous damping and leakage current) on its dynamic responses. By using an antagonistic pure-shear DEA configuration, Zhang *et al*.^{[40]} also investigated the loss-of-tension due to the large deformation of the membranes during vibrations and demonstrated that the loss-of-tension can be eliminated by increasing the pre-stretch ratio.

However, although loss-of-tension in pure-shear DEAs has been demonstrated, no work has looked at the effects of loss-of-tension on the frequency responses of such actuators. For silicone elastomers, which usually adopt low pre-stretch ratios (typically between 1-2; e.g., 1.0 in^{[14]}, 1.02 in^{[15]}, or 1.2 in^{[19]}) and exhibit low viscous damping^{[18,41,42]}, loss-of-tension could be expected in high-amplitude vibrations, particularly near the resonance of the system where amplitude can be dramatically increased. Hence in this work, by adopting the antagonistic pure-shear DEA configuration, we use a numerical model to analyze the effects of the loss-of-tension mechanism on the nonlinear dynamic response of the DEA under low pre-stretch conditions. From this, we uncover the resonant responses that are detached from the main response branch - these isolated resonant responses cannot be detected by conventional continuation methods but, once triggered, they will cause a sudden change in the oscillation amplitude and response phase, which serves as a real threat to the dynamic stability and controllability of such DEA systems; hence they demand careful and dedicated investigation.

The rest of this paper is structured as follows. In section **DYNAMIC MODELLING**, the DEA structure is introduced and the governing dynamic equations are developed. In section **RESULTS AND DISCUSSION**, the nonlinear dynamics and resonances due to loss-of-tension are investigated in the subsection **Nonlinear dynamic response**. A parametric study is then conducted in the subsection **Parametric study** which studies the effects of the forcing parameters and physical system parameters on the frequency responses. Finally, conclusions are drawn in section **CONCLUSION**.

## Dynamic modelling

### System overview and actuation principle

The basic structure of the antagonistic pure-shear DEA is shown in Figure 1A. The undeformed DE membrane has the dimensions of *L*_{1}, *L*_{2}, and *L*_{3} in direction 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Two identical DE membranes, I and II, are pre-stretched along direction 1 by *λ*_{p} and then bonded to the constraint frames. One mass, *M*, is attached to one end of each membrane and is constrained to allow only horizontal translation (i.e., no vertical motion, hence neglecting gravitational force). In its passive equilibrium (no actuation voltage applied), the mass is balanced in the center by the tensile forces of the two membranes, *F*_{I} and *F*_{II}. The actuation principle of the antagonistic pure-shear DEA relies on the force balance of the two membranes on the mass. When a voltage, *Φ*, is applied across the electrodes of DEA I, the electrostatic pressure, induced by the electric field, reduces the tension on membrane I, *F*_{I}. The force imbalance leads to a translation of the mass along direction 1 until another force balance is achieved between the two membranes, as is shown in Figure 1A. The stretch ratios of membranes I and II during deformation, *λ*_{I} and *λ*_{II}, are defined as the ratios of the deformed lengths in direction 1 and the initial length, *L*_{1}.

### Equation of motion

The equation of motion that describes the dynamic responses of this system has been described in detail in previous studies^{[24,26,36,40,43]}. Hence, in this work, the development of the equation of motion is introduced briefly and the final equation used for the rest of the study is given in the end of this subsection.

The two DE membranes and mass are considered separately at this stage with the subsystem membrane I being investigated first. A thermodynamic framework is adopted, which indicates that the variation of the free energy of the DE during actuation is equal to the work done jointly by the voltage, tensile force, the viscous damping, and the inertial force of the membrane.

To derive this model, it is assumed that a voltage, *T*_{I}, is applied across the compliant electrodes of the membrane and a charge, *Q*_{I}, is built on the electrodes. A tensile force, *P*, is applied to the membrane in direction 1. The membrane material is assumed to have a density, *ρ*, and a viscous damping coefficient, *c*. For an infinitesimal variation of *δλ*_{I}, by conservation of energy

where W is the Helmholtz free energy density, and can be expressed using the Gent model^{[44]} as

where *μ* is the shear modulus of the material, *J* is the constant relating to the limiting stretch, *D*_{I} is the electric displacement of membrane I and is given as , and *ε* is the permittivity.

Note that the Helmholtz free energy density equation given here is simplified due to there being no stretch in direction 2 on the DE membrane.

By partially differentiating equation 2 with respect to *λ*_{I} and substituting to equation 1, one can obtain the expression for the tensile force, which is written as

It is worth noting that a membrane is a type of element that can only withstand tension in direction 1 by neglecting the effects of shear stress in the membrane due to the sufficiently high area-to-thickness ratio. Hence if the tensional force on the membrane in the deformation direction becomes zero, the membrane loses tension in this direction, as illustrated in Figure 1B and C. However, this phenomenon cannot be captured by the well-developed continuous force-stretch function in equation 3, for instance, when *λ*_{I} < 1, the tensile force, *P*, becomes a finite negative value, which cannot be true. Note that in previous antagonistic pure-shear DEA studies, *P* was considered as a continuous function in the region-of-interest as the pre-stretch value was usually sufficiently large so that *λ*_{I} remains > 1. However, in this study, where a low pre-stretch value is used, the deformation, particularly at high-amplitude vibrations near the resonance of the system, can be large enough to cause loss-of-tension on the DE membrane which creates non-smoothness in the force function thus discontinuity in the stiffness. To take this effect in to account, a piecewise force function is used in this work, and is written as

where *F*_{I} is the true tensile force in membrane I.

Due to the constraint applied to the two DE membranes, the stretch of membrane II can be written as

Then the true tensile force, FII, can be obtained by substituting equation 5 into 4, and is given as

where *Φ*_{II}, is the voltage applied to membrane II.

The equation of motion for the mass can be obtained as

By performing nondimensionalization and neglecting the inertia force of the membranes by assuming a sufficiently large *M* compared to the mass of the membrane, *ρL*_{1}*L*_{2}*L*_{3}, the equation of motion can be rewritten as

where

is the non-dimensional time, is the non-dimensional voltage, is the non-dimensional damping coefficient.

Figure 2A shows examples of the total force exerted on the mass, *f*_{t}*=* -*f*_{I} + *f*_{II}, against the stretch offset from its passive equilibrium (with no actuation voltage), *Δλ*_{I} = *λ*_{I} - *λ*_{p}. Note from Figure 2A that, as the pre-stretch is greater than 1.0, discontinuity is created when either *f*_{I} or *f*_{II} becomes zero, which corresponds to *λ*_{I} and *λ*_{II} = 1, respectively. It is noteworthy that, in the region where -(*λ*_{p} - 1) < *Δλ*_{I} < (*λ*_{p} - 1), the system appears to be “stiffer” (the slope is steeper) than other regions as the two membranes act on the mass antagonistically in this region. As a voltage is applied to membrane I, the discontinuity points do not necessarily correspond to *λ*_{I} and *λ*_{II} = 1, as illustrated in Figure 2B. It can be noted that the leftmost discontinuity is shifting to the right as the voltage increases and the force-displacement function is no longer symmetrical around the passive equilibrium (origin in Figure 2).

Figure 2. Force-displacement relationship of the antagonistic pure-shear DEA. (A) Total force vs. stretch offset with pre-stretch *λ _{p}* = 1.0, 1.02, and 1.05.

*φ*=

_{I}*φ*= 0 in all three cases. (B) Total force

_{II}*vs*. stretch offset with non-dimensional voltage

*φ*= 0, 0.2, and 0.3.

_{I}*λ*= 1.02 and

_{p}*φ*= 0 in all three cases.

_{II}In this work, the Gent model parameters (*μ* and *J*) are determined based on the previous studies on the silicone elastomer ELASTOSIL (Wacker Chemie AG)^{[42,45,46]} and is given as *μ* = 400 kPa and *J* = 16. The dimension of the elastomer is defined as *L*_{1} = 20 mm, *L*_{2} = 200 mm, and *L*_{3} = 0.1 mm. The mass *M* is chosen as 50 g. The permittivity, *ε*, is a product of the absolute permittivity of a vacuum and the relative permittivity of the dielectric elastomer and is given as *ε* = 2.48 × 10^{-11} F/m.

By solving the nondimensionalized equation of motion, equation 8, numerically in MATLAB (MathWorks), the dynamic performance of the DEA system under parametric mechanisms of excitation is investigated systemically in the following sections.

## Results and discussion

### Nonlinear dynamic responses

In this section, the nonlinear dynamic responses of the pure-shear DEA under AC voltage excitation are investigated. In this study, only membrane I is subject to a time-varying voltage excitation, while no actuation voltage is applied to membrane II. The forcing term of this system, , as described in equation 9e, is a function of the displacement, *λ*_{I}, hence this system is excited parametrically^{[47]}. It is noteworthy that the forcing term is also a function of the square of the voltage input. Therefore, for an non-dimensional AC voltage signal given as *φ*_{I} = *φ*_{DC} + *φ*_{AC} cos(*ω*_{e}*τ*), where *φ*_{DC} and *φ*_{AC} are the non-dimensional direct current (DC) and AC voltage amplitudes respectively and is the non-dimensional angular excitation frequency, the force experienced by the moving mass is proportional to (following the authors’ previous work^{[46]})

where

From equation 10 it can be noted that the voltage forcing term contains one constant biasing component and two time-varying components, one at the excitation frequency and the second at twice the input frequency. As such, when the excitation frequency is close to either the natural frequency of the DEA system or half of its value, resonances can be observed^{[42,48]}, which are termed *primary harmonic resonance* and *super-harmonic resonance*, respectively. It is worth noting that both the DC and AC voltage amplitudes contribute to the biasing forcing component, *E*_{a}. As a result, varying either *φ*_{AC} or *φ*_{DC} could result in a change in the biasing excitation component, which then leads to a shift in the equilibrium point, and hence the resonant behavior. To analyze the dynamic responses of the DEA system consistently, the biasing forcing term, *E*_{a}, AC to DC amplitude ratio, *ADR* = *φ*_{AC}/*φ*_{DC} and the excitation frequency, *ω*_{e}, are considered as three independent variables. In this section, the frequency response of the DEA system is investigated by varying the excitation frequency while fixing the *E*_{a} value at 0.2^{2}, and two *ADR* values of 0.6 and 1.0 are chosen for comparison. In these two cases, the amplitudes for *E*_{b} are 0.041 and 0.053 respectively, while *E*_{c} is changed from 0.006 to 0.013 as *ADR* is increased from 0.6 to 1.0. It can be noted that, even though the biasing forcing amplitude *E*_{a} remains unchanged, the increase in *ADR* in fact increases the amplitudes of the two time-varying forcing components. The results of these increments will lead to a higher resonance amplitude of the DEA and can also lead to new dynamic phenomenon, as will be shown in the next subsection. The non-dimensional damping coefficient is given as and the pre-stretch ratio is *λ*_{P} = 1.02. It is noteworthy that, with the material parameters adopted in this work, the nominal electrical breakdown electric field is about 90 MV/m with no pre-stretch^{[49]}, while the applying nominal amplitude adopted in this study is equivalent to about 40 MV/m, which is significantly lower than the critical value. As a result, it is believed that no electric breakdown occurs within this study.

#### Frequency sweep results

In the first study, forward and backward frequency sweeps are conducted for the *ADR* = 0.6 and 1.0 case from a non-dimensional frequency of 0 to 6 (6 to 0 for the backward sweep) over *τ* = 12000. The sweep results are shown in Figure 3A and B, respectively. For the *ADR* = 0.6 case, two distinct resonant peaks can be observed and, for each resonant peak, a backward sweep leads to a higher amplitude than the forward sweep, which is mainly due to the strong nonlinearity in the DEA system causing the occurrence of two possible stable oscillations at the frequencies near resonance, one with very high resonant amplitude and another one with low amplitude. Note that, in the forward frequency sweep, as the sweep frequency approaches the resonant frequency from a lower value, the response first follows the lower branch and experiences a sudden jump up, before gradually reducing as the excitation frequency increases further, as illustrated by the dark-blue arrows in Figure 3A. However, in the backward sweep result, the response follows the high amplitude branch as the sweep frequency decreases from above resonance and drops down sharply once the maximum value is reached. As the *ADR* value is increased to 1.0, the two resonant peaks observed in the *ADR* = 0.6 case grow in amplitude. Furthermore, a new resonant peak emerges at a higher sweep frequency, as marked in Figure 3B.

Figure 3. (A) Frequency sweep results of the *ADR* = 0.6 case, blue represents the forward frequency sweep and red illustrates the backward sweep. (B) Frequency sweep results of the *ADR* = 1.0 case. (C) Scalogram of the ADR = 0.6 case, where dark-red represents high-amplitude frequency responses. (D) Scalogram of the *ADR* = 1.0 case.

The frequency components and their amplitudes in the forward frequency sweeps for the *ADR* = 0.6 and 1.0 cases are analyzed using a wavelet transform and the scalograms are shown in Figure 3C and D, respectively. It can be noted from Figure 3C that the fundamental response frequency, *ω*_{r}, (the frequency component in the response with the highest amplitude, represented by the dark-red color) is equal to the excitation frequency, *ω*_{e}, with the exception near the first resonant peak, where *ω*_{r} = 2*ω*_{e}, demonstrating a super-harmonic response. The fundamental response frequency in the case *ADR* = 1.0 follows the same pattern. The new resonant peak found in this case shows an *ω*_{r} = 0.5*ω*_{e} relationship, which corresponds to a *subharmonic response*.

#### Detailed frequency response study

The frequency sweep results demonstrated that, apart from super-harmonic and harmonic resonance, which result from the square of the sinusoidal excitation function, there exists the subharmonic response that is not directly correlated to the excitation. The results also illustrated that multiple stable periodic solutions might exist at a single frequency for this dynamic system (e.g., the region between the jump-up and down points in Figure 3A) and the stable periodic solution of the system is determined by the its initial conditions, displacement and velocity. By using a sufficient set of initial conditions at each excitation frequency, and numerically integrating the equation of motion in the time domain until the system reaches a steady-state periodic oscillation, the stable responses of the DEA system, which might be hidden from the forward and backward sweeps, can be analyzed.

##### i. ADR = 0.6 case

Figure 4 shows the frequency response for the *ADR* = 0.6 case. It can be noted that, apart from the super-harmonic (red) and harmonic (blue) resonant peaks observed in the frequency sweep results in Figure 3A, a “hidden” resonant peak is uncovered using this multi-initial condition approach, as marked in green in Figure 4. The third resonant peak is in fact the same subharmonic resonant peak observed in the *ADR* = 1.0 case in Figure 3B, yet it is detached from the main response branch. Hence, in a continuous frequency sweep, such a response is not able to be captured and tends to be overlooked when analyzing such systems. Isolated response curves, or *isolas*, have been reported in different nonlinear dynamic systems (see, e.g.,^{[50-54]}). Yet to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that an isolated subharmonic response curve being demonstrated theoretically using a parametrically forced DEA system. The mechanism leading to this type of isolated curve has not been fully understood, but it is believed to a result of the multi-valuedness of the nonlinear system at some frequencies^{[50,51]}. The oscillation amplitude of the isola can be over 10-fold higher than the primary response at the same frequency, once triggered, it will cause a sudden jump in the oscillation amplitude, which serves as a real threat to the dynamic stability and controllability of such DEA systems. In practical applications, this could lead to a system failure and catastrophic outcomes.

Figure 4. Frequency response, time histories and phase paths at *ω*_{e} = 1.2, *ω*_{e} = 1.8, and *ω*_{e} = 3.7 for *ADR* = 0.6 case.

Note from Figure 4 that, at all three frequencies where resonant peaks occur, as marked by i, ii, and iii, there exists two stable periodic solutions. The time histories and the phase paths of the stable periodic oscillations at *ω*_{e} = 1.2, *ω*_{e} = 1.8, and *ω*_{e} = 3.7 are also plotted in Figure 4. It can be noted that at *ω*_{e} = 1.2, for both high and low amplitude solutions, the mass oscillates twice as the excitation signal repeats itself once, demonstrating a clear 2:1 super-harmonic behavior (i.e., *ω*_{r}:*ω*_{e} = 2:1). At *ω*_{e} = 1.8 where the primary resonance occurs, the high amplitude solution lags behind the excitation signal by 90 degrees, while the low-amplitude one is approximately in-phase with the excitation. At *ω*_{e} = 3.7, two types of periodic solutions exist, where the high amplitude solution corresponds to a 1:2 subharmonic response (i.e., the mass oscillates once in every two excitation cycles). The low amplitude solution shows a 1:1 anti-phase response with the excitation signal.

##### ii. DR = 1.0 case

The same frequency response analysis is conducted for the *ADR* = 1.0 case and is shown in Figure 5. It can be noted that, in contrast to the *ADR* = 0.6 case, the 1:2 subharmonic resonant branch is “attached” to the main branch, that is, only one stable solution exists near the root of the subharmonic branch. Hence this resonant response cannot be “skipped” in a continuous frequency sweep (as shown in Figure 3B). The transition from an isola to an attached response curve is believed to be attributed to the transcritical bifurcation^{[52]}, in other words, the unstable solution between the two stable solutions lowers and eventually merges with the 1:1 harmonic branch as *ADR* increases.

Figure 5. Frequency response, time histories and phase paths of the three stable periodic solutions at *ω _{e}* = 3.6 for

*ADR*= 1.0 case.

It is noteworthy that, in the *ADR* = 1.0 case, a new isola emerges between the 1:1 harmonic and 1:2 subharmonic branches, as is indicated by the purple dots in Figure 5. However, this isola occurs only at a very narrow frequency band from *ω*_{e} ≈ 3.65 to 3.75. Note that, at *ω*_{e} = 3.7, there exist three stable periodic solutions, and the time history and phase path of each solution are plotted in Figure 5. The solution in purple repeats itself in every three excitation cycles, which correlates to a 1:3 subharmonic response.

##### iii. Basins of attraction

In the previous study, multiple stable periodic solutions of the DEA system at some excitation frequencies have been demonstrated for both *ADR* = 0.6 and 1.0 cases. To map the initial conditions that are attracted to the different periodic solutions in the two cases, a *point mapping* technique^{[55]} is adopted by dividing the initial condition region of interest into discrete points and numerically computing the steady-state response that each initial condition leads to. By plotting the initial conditions and the corresponding steady-state response, *Basins of attraction* can be obtained. In this study, the initial displacement and velocity ranges are set as [-0.8, 0.8] and [-1, 1] with a step fixed at 0.08, which lead to a total of 201 × 251 points.

Two cases are considered in this basin of attraction study: (1) *ADR* = 0.6 and *ω*_{e} = 3.7; and (2) *ADR* = 1.0 and *ω*_{e} = 3.6. In the first case, there are two stable periodic responses (i.e., a 1:1 harmonic and 1:2 subharmonic) where the latter one is on the isola, as is demonstrated in Figure 4. In the second case, apart from these two types of periodic orbits, a 1:3 subharmonic response also exists, as is demonstrated in Figure 5.

The basins of attraction for the two cases are plotted in Figure 6A and B, respectively. The black, white and red regions correspond to the periodic oscillations with 1:1 harmonic, 1:2 subharmonic and 1:3 subharmonic responses, respectively. It can be noted that both black and white basins follow a spiral pattern. Also note that the black basin occupies the largest area in both cases, which indicates that, for both cases, the system is more likely to be attracted to a low amplitude 1:1 harmonic response. A more intricate pattern can be found for red basin in Figure 6B and its area is much smaller than the other two basins, meaning it can be more difficult to detect without using the rigorous initial condition search since it is isolated from the main response curve. It is worth noting that, for both cases, there exists a non-negligible possibility to achieve a periodic response on the isolated response curve by adequately perturbing the system.

### Parametric study

In the last section, the frequency response of the DEA system with *ADR* = 0.6 and *ADR* = 1.0 were analyzed and isolated response curves were uncovered in both cases. It was noted that the isola observed in the *ADR* = 0.6 case becomes attached to the main response curve as *ADR* is increased to 1.0. In this section, an extensive parametric study is conducted to investigate the effects of excitation voltage parameters (*ADR* and *E*_{a}), the damping, and the pre-stretch ratio of the DE membrane on the frequency response of the system. Particular attention is given to the evolution of the isola and its interaction with the main branch.

#### Effects of excitation parameters

In this subsection, the effects of the excitation parameters (*ADR* and *E*_{a}) on the frequency response of the system are studied. First, the *ADR* value is varied from 0.2 to 1.0 while keeping *E*_{a} as 0.2^{2}, and the results are presented in Figure 7. The pre-stretch ratio is set as *λ*_{p} = 1.02 and the non-dimensional damping coefficient is . Note that Figure 7 shows the oscillation amplitude as a function of the excitation frequency, defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values of *λ*_{I} in a steady-state periodic oscillation cycle.

Figure 7. Effects of *ADR* value on the frequency response of the DEA system. Zoomed in sections show the evolution of the 1:2 subharmonic response curve. *λ _{p}* = 1.02, , and

*E*= 0.22 are adopted in this study.

_{a}As the *ADR* value increases, both the harmonic forcing amplitude *E*_{b} and super-harmonic forcing amplitude *E*_{c} in equation 10 increase, which increases the harmonic and super-harmonic resonant amplitudes in Figure 7. It can be noted from Figure 7 that, at a low *ADR* = 0.2, no subharmonic response can be found in this system, and, as *ADR* is increased to 0.25, a subharmonic isola emerges and its amplitude grows as *ADR* increases further. At *ADR* = 0.65, the isola begins to merge with the main branch, as highlighted in the zoomed-in section. When the *ADR* value is increased to 1.0, this isolated response curve is firmly attached to the main branch. Meanwhile, a new 1:3 subharmonic isola appears at *ADR* = 1.0, which is also demonstrated in Figure 5.

In the next study, the *ADR* value is fixed at 0.6 while varying the *E*_{a} and the results are plotted in Figure 8. Increasing the *E*_{a} value increases both the AC and DC components of the excitation simultaneously, which causes higher *E*_{b} and *E*_{c} forcing components; this leads to increases in the amplitudes of both the harmonic and super-harmonic responses. The 1:2 subharmonic response also emerges as *E*_{a} increases, first as an isola, before attaching to the main branch as *E*_{a} rises further. Note that, as *E*_{a} becomes sufficiently high, the displacement from the equilibrium to one end could be greater than 1, which violates the physical constraints of this system (i.e., the mass will collide with the constraint frames). For the case with *λ*_{p} = 1.02, , and *ADR* = 0.6, *E*_{a} should be less than 0.25^{2} to avoid collision.

#### Effects of damping

In this subsection, the effects of a physical parameter, i.e., damping coefficient , is investigated with the focus on the excitation frequency range of 3 to 6 where the subharmonic resonant peak occurs. In this study, the *ADR*, *E*_{a}, and *λ*_{p} values are set as 0.6, 0.2^{2}, and 1.02, respectively, while is increased from 0.02 to 0.1 with an increment of 0.02.

The frequency response of the DEA systems with different damping coefficients are shown in Figure 9. It is worth noting that, for all five cases, the 1:2 subharmonic response curve remains detached from the main curve. As the damping coefficient increases, the size of the isola shrinks and eventually vanishes at . Also note that in the lightest damping case () there exists the 1:3 subharmonic isola, but this isola quickly disappears as becomes higher. The viscous damping in the DE membranes has a clear effect on the development of isolas in this system, for VHB elastomers which have significant viscoelastic properties, the high viscous damping could reduce and even eliminate the isola phenomenon. However, utilizing resonant actuation to optimize the dynamic performance of a DEA system usually requires minimizing the viscous damping in the actuation system, which is one of the main reasons why, in dynamic applications, silicone elastomers are preferable to VHB^{[15,16]}. It should be noted that silicone DEA systems require comprehensive dynamic analyses to ensure their dynamic behavior is fully understood due to their low viscous damping.

#### Effects of pre-stretch

Apart from the damping coefficient, another important physical parameter for the DEA system is the pre-stretch ratio, *λ*_{p}. In this study, the pre-stretch ratio is varied from 1.01 to 1.06, while the other parameters are fixed at *ADR* = 0.6, *E*_{a} = 0.2^{2}, and . The results of this study are plotted in Figure 10 with a focus on the evolution of the subharmonic response curve. Note from Figure 10 that, at the lowest pre-stretch value of 1.01, the subhramonic response curve is attached to the main branch, and quickly transitions to an isola as *λ*_{p} is increased to 1.02. It is noteworthy that increasing *λ*_{p} leads to a reduction in the size of the subharmonic response curve, such that the peak amplitude reduces and the bottom of the curve separates further from the main branch. At *λ*_{p} = 1.06, the subharmonic curve disappears under the current forcing conditions.

### Discussions

The study of the effects of the damping coefficients and the pre-stretch ratios demonstrate that, under the same forcing conditions, by increasing either the damping coefficients or the pre-stretch ratios, the subharmonic response is suppressed and eventually vanishes. However, it cannot be concluded that subharmonic responses, either in isolated or attached form, do not exist in the parametrically forced DEA system when the physical parameters reach those values. For insistence, as is demonstrated in the last subplot in Figures 9 and 10, for (, *λ*_{p} = 1.02) and (, *λ*_{p} = 1.06) cases, no subharmonic response is observed with the forcing condition of *ADR* = 0.6 and *E*_{a} = 0.2^{2}. However, it is found that, by increasing the forcing amplitude, a subharmonic response can be triggered again, as is demonstrated in Figure 11.

Figure 11. Examples showing that, by increasing the forcing amplitude, the vanished subharmonic response can be triggered again. (A) , *λ _{p}* = 1.02, and

*ADR*= 0.6. Ea is increased from 0.22 to 0.32. (B) ,

*λ*= 1.06, and

_{p}*ADR*= 0.6.

*E*

_{a}is increased from 0.22 to 0.252.

The structure of the subharmonic response exhibits a complex interaction between the two physical parameters ( and *λ*_{p}) and the forcing parameters (*ADR* and *E*_{a}). Note that, by using the control variate technique, the effects of each parameter may be analyzed separately. However, the subharmonic response of this system is due to the interaction between different parameters. As shown in Figure 12, when *λ*_{p} reaches 1.2, even though the forcing amplitude is higher (*E*_{a} = 0.3^{2}), there is no subharmonic response. Hence a future work that fully investigates the five-dimensional space (*ω*_{e}, *E*_{a}, *ADR*, , and *λ*_{p}) could enhance the understanding of the isolated resonance responses in the DEA system.

## Conclusions

This paper has investigated the nonlinear dynamic behavior of an antagonistic pure-shear DEA with a low pre-stretch ratio. Under high-amplitude oscillations, such a configuration can lead to the loss-of-tension of the DE membranes, which induces the discontinuity in the force-displacement function. By simulating the effect of initial conditions, the isolated subharmonic resonant responses have been uncovered; these behaviors cannot be captured using conventional continuation methods (e.g., frequency sweeps or steps). The main contributions of this work are: (1) reporting isolated subharmonic response curves in a DEA system for the first time; (2) developing a comprehensive method for the analysis of isolas in DEA systems, including global analysis and an electro-mechanically coupled DEA dynamics model; and (3) demonstrating the correlation between the system and forcing parameters and the evolution of isolas. The key findings of this paper are listed as follow:

The pure-shear DEA exhibits multiple types of frequency response, including 2:1 super-harmonics, 1:1 harmonics, 1:2 subharmonics, and 1:3 subharmonics.

The 2:1 super-harmonic and 1:1 harmonic responses are the result of the square of the excitation function.

Subharmonic resonant responses do not occur naturally from the forcing function, instead, it is a result of the complex interaction between the forcing and response.

Increasing the forcing amplitude first leads to the growth of the subharmonic response curve outside the main frequency response curve, before causing it to attach to the main branch.

Under the same forcing condition, increasing the damping coefficient and pre-stretch ratio could reduce the size of the subharmonic response curve until it vanishes.

Isolated response curves have received increasing attention in the nonlinear dynamics community as they often represent high amplitude responses which could lead to catastrophic outcomes^{[56]}. For DEA dynamic systems, isolas can be easily overlooked by using continuation methods and in controlled environments with no perturbations, such as static lab conditions. However, in practical applications where the environment is dynamically changing, adequate perturbations could trigger isolas hidden in DEA systems, causing the response to jump to a high amplitude, which then leads to loss of control of the system. As a result, a careful selection of the system parameters and a comprehensive study of the dynamic responses are essential to avoid such outcomes in resonating DEA applications where dynamic stability and controllability are crucial. In the meantime, as highlighted in^{[50,51]}, the isolas demonstrated in the antagonistic pure-shear DEA system could also be exploited, for instance, in highly versatile dynamic mechanical oscillation systems with multiple resonant modes and amplitudes. Such oscillating systems could have practical applications in highly programmable robotic locomotion where the multiple resonant modes and amplitudes can serve as means for steering and speed regulation. The initial condition sensitivity of the isolas within these systems can be utilized as a passive collision controller for robots. For example, when a robot collides with other objects, the sudden change in system states can trigger isolas which increases the oscillation amplitude of the actuator, thus allowing for rapid escape of the robot. These systems can also be used in smart energy harvesting where the isolas can be actively triggered to increase bandwidth and efficiency of energy conversion.

## Declarations

Authors’ contributionsMade substantial contributions to conception: Cao C, Hill TL, Gao X

Design of the study: Cao C, Chen G, Li B, Gao X

Data analysis and interpretation: Cao C, Hill TL, Wang L, Gao X

Data acquisition: Cao C

Administrative, technical, and material support: Cao C, Hill TL, Wang L, Gao X

Manuscript writing: Cao C, Hill TL, Li B, Chen G, Wang L, Gao X

Availability of data and materialsNot applicable.

Financial support and sponsorshipThis work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2019YFB1311600; in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Grant 62003333; in part by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2020A1515110175; and in part by the Shenzhen Fundamental Research Project JCYJ20200109115639654.

Conflicts of interestAll authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participateNot applicable.

Consent for publicationNot applicable.

Copyright© The Author(s) 2021.

## REFERENCES

1. Pelrine R, Kornbluh R, Pei Q, et al. High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. *Science* 2000;287:836-9.

2. Wang N, Cui C, Guo H, et al. Advances in dielectric elastomer actuation technology. *Sci China Technol Sci* 2018;61:1512-27.

3. Carpi F, Salaris C, De Rossi D. Folded dielectric elastomer actuators. *Smart Mater Struct* 2007;16:S300-5.

4. Conn A, Rossiter J. Towards holonomic electro-elastomer actuators with six degrees of freedom. *Smart Mater Struct* 2012;21:035012.

5. Cao C, Chen L, Thomas H, et al. On the mechanical power output comparisons of cone dielectric elastomer actuators. *IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron* 2021; doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2021.3054460.

6. Zhao H, Hussain A, Duduta M, et al. Compact dielectric elastomer linear actuators. *Adv Funct Mater* 2018;28:1804328.

7. Luo M, Liu L, Liu C, et al. A single-chamber pneumatic soft bending actuator with increased stroke-range by local electric guidance. *IEEE Trans Ind Electron* 2020; doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3013544.

8. Kofod G, Wirges W, Paajanen M, et al. Energy minimization for self-organized structure formation and actuation. *Appl Phys Lett* 2007;90:1-4.

9. Wang Y, Gupta U, Parulekar N, et al. A soft gripper of fast speed and low energy consumption. *Sci China Technol Sci* 2019;62:31-8.

10. Tang C, Li B, Fang H, et al. A speedy, amphibian, robotic cube: resonance actuation by a dielectric elastomer. *Sensors Actuators A Phys* 2018;270:1-7.

13. Zhao J, Niu J, McCoul D, et al. Phenomena of nonlinear oscillation and special resonance of a dielectric elastomer minimum energy structure rotary joint. *Appl Phys Lett* 2015;106:133504.

14. Cao C, Gao X, Burgess S, et al. Power optimization of a conical dielectric elastomer actuator for resonant robotic systems. *Extrem Mech Lett* 2019;35:100619.

15. Chen Y, Zhao H, Mao J, et al. Controlled flight of a microrobot powered by soft artificial muscles. *Nature* 2019;575:324-9.

16. Ji X, Liu X, Cacucciolo V, et al. An autonomous untethered fast soft robotic insect driven by low-voltage dielectric elastomer actuators. *Sci Robot* 2019;4:eaaz6451.

17. Li Z, Zhu J, Foo C, et al. A robust dual-membrane dielectric elastomer actuator for large volume fluid pumping via snap-through. *Appl Phys Lett* 2017;111:212901.

18. Cao C, Gao X, Conn A. A magnetically coupled dielectric elastomer pump for soft robotics. *Adv Mater Technol* 2019;4:1900128.

19. Shintake J, Rosset S, Schubert B, et al. Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. *Adv Mater* 2016;28:231-8.

20. Gao X, Cao C, Guo J, et al. Elastic electroadhesion with rapid release by integrated resonant vibration. *Adv Mater Technol* 2019;4:1800378.

21. Li B, Cai Y, Jiang L, et al. A flexible morphing wing by soft wing skin actuation utilizing dielectric elastomer: experiments and electro-aerodynamic model. *Smart Mater Struct* 2020;29:015031.

22. Gupta U, Godaba H, Zhao Z, et al. Tunable force/displacement of a vibration shaker driven by a dielectric elastomer actuator. *Extrem Mech Lett* 2015;2:72-7.

23. Jordi C, Michel S, Kovacs G, et al. Scaling of planar dielectric elastomer actuators in an agonist-antagonist configuration. *Sensors Actuators A Phys* 2010;161:182-90.

24. Gu G, Gupta U, Zhu J, et al. Modeling of viscoelastic electromechanical behavior in a soft dielectric elastomer actuator. *IEEE Trans Robot* 2017;33:1263-71.

25. Lu T, Huang J, Jordi C, et al. Dielectric elastomer actuators under equal-biaxial forces, uniaxial forces, and uniaxial constraint of stiff fibers. *Soft Matter* 2012;8:6167.

26. Goh Y, Akbari S, Khanh Vo T, et al. Electrically-induced actuation of acrylic-based dielectric elastomers in excess of 500% Strain. *Soft Robot* 2018;5:675-84.

27. Zhang J, Chen H, Sheng J, et al. Dynamic performance of dissipative dielectric elastomers under alternating mechanical load. *Appl Phys A* 2014;116:59-67.

28. Liu F, Sun W, Zhao X, et al. Method towards optimal design of dielectric elastomer actuated soft machines. *Sci China Technol Sci* 2018;61:959-64.

29. Li B, Zhang J, Chen H, et al. Voltage-induced pinnacle response in the dynamics of dielectric elastomers. *Phys Rev E* 2016;93:052506.

30. Dai H, Wang L. Nonlinear oscillations of a dielectric elastomer membrane subjected to in-plane stretching. *Nonlinear Dyn* 2015;82:1709-19.

31. Shintake J, Rosset S, Schubert B, et al. A foldable antagonistic actuator. *IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron* 2015;20:1997-2008.

32. Liu L, Chen H, Sheng J, et al. Experimental study on the dynamic response of in-plane deformation of dielectric elastomer under alternating electric load. *Smart Mater Struct* 2014;23:025037.

33. Li T, Zou Z, Mao G, et al. Electromechanical bistable behavior of a novel dielectric elastomer actuator. *J Appl Mech* 2013;81:041019.

34. Hau S, Bruch D, Rizzello G, et al. Silicone based dielectric elastomer strip actuators coupled with nonlinear biasing elements for large actuation strains. *Smart Mater Struct* 2018;27:074003.

35. Lu T, Shi Z, Shi Q, et al. Bioinspired bicipital muscle with fiber-constrained dielectric elastomer actuator. *Extrem Mech Lett* 2016;6:75-81.

37. Li B, Zhang J, Liu L, et al. Modeling of dielectric elastomer as electromechanical resonator. *J Appl Phys* 2014;116:124509.

38. Liu L, Li B, Sun W, et al. Viscoelastic effect and creep elimination of dielectric elastomers in adversarial resonance. *J Appl Phys* 2016;120:164502.

39. Zhang J, Zhao J, Chen H, et al. Dynamic analyses of viscoelastic dielectric elastomers incorporating viscous damping effect. *Smart Mater Struct* 2017;26:015010.

40. Zhang J, Chen H, Li D. Pinnacle elimination and stability analyses in nonlinear oscillation of soft dielectric elastomer slide actuators. *Nonlinear Dyn* 2018;94:1907-20.

41. Cao C, Burgess S, Conn A. Toward a dielectric elastomer resonator driven flapping wing micro air vehicle. *Front Robot AI* 2019;5:1-11.

42. Cao C, Hill T, Conn A. On the nonlinear dynamics of a circular dielectric elastomer oscillator. *Smart Mater Struct* 2019;28:075020.

43. Sheng J, Chen H, Li B, et al. Nonlinear dynamic characteristics of a dielectric elastomer membrane undergoing in-plane deformation. *Smart Mater Struct* 2014;23:045010.

45. Cao C, Gao X, Conn A. A compliantly coupled dielectric elastomer actuator using magnetic repulsion. *Appl Phys Lett* 2019;114:011904.

46. Cao C, Hill T, Conn A, et al. Nonlinear dynamics of a magnetically coupled dielectric elastomer actuator. *Phys Rev Appl* 2019;12:044033.

47. Zhu J, Cai S, Suo Z. Resonant behavior of a membrane of a dielectric elastomer. *Int J Solids Struct* 2010;47:3254-62.

48. Hodgins M, Rizzello G, Naso D, et al. An electro-mechanically coupled model for the dynamic behavior of a dielectric electro-active polymer actuator. *Smart Mater Struct* 2014;23:104006.

49. Forster-Zügel F, Solano-Arana S, Klug F, et al. Dielectric breakdown strength measurements with silicone-based single-layer dielectric elastomer transducers. *Smart Mater Struct* 2019;28:075042.

50. Gatti G. Uncovering inner detached resonance curves in coupled oscillators with nonlinearity. *J Sound Vib* 2016;372:239-54.

51. Gatti G, Brennan M. Inner detached frequency response curves: an experimental study. *J Sound Vib* 2017;396:246-54.

52. Duan C, Singh R. Isolated sub-harmonic resonance branch in the frequency response of an oscillator with slight asymmetry in the clearance. *J Sound Vib* 2008;314:12-8.

53. Ehrhardt D, Hill T, Neild S. Experimentally measuring an isolated branch of Nonlinear normal modes. *J Sound Vib* 2019;457:213-26.

54. Hong D, Hill T, Neild S. Conditions for the existence of isolated backbone curves. *Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci* 2019;475:20190374.

55. Wagg D, Neild S. Nonlinear vibration with control. Springer-Verlag; 2009.

## Cite This Article

**OAE Style**

Cao C, Hill TL, Li B, Chen G, Wang L, Gao X. Uncovering isolated resonant responses in antagonistic pure-shear dielectric elastomer actuators. *Soft Sci* 2021;1:1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2021.01

**AMA Style**

Cao C, Hill TL, Li B, Chen G, Wang L, Gao X. Uncovering isolated resonant responses in antagonistic pure-shear dielectric elastomer actuators. *Soft Science*. 2021; 1(1): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2021.01

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Cao, Chongjing, Thomas L. Hill, Bo Li, Guimin Chen, Lei Wang, Xing Gao. 2021. "Uncovering isolated resonant responses in antagonistic pure-shear dielectric elastomer actuators" *Soft Science*. 1, no.1: 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2021.01

**ACS Style**

Cao, C.; Hill TL.; Li B.; Chen G.; Wang L.; Gao X. Uncovering isolated resonant responses in antagonistic pure-shear dielectric elastomer actuators. *Soft. Sci.* **2021**, *1*, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ss.2021.01

## Related

## Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

**30**clicks

**0**comments

**36**likes

*|*

^{0}