Glycaemic control strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective surgery
Department of Bariatric Surgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol Trust, Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom.
Correspondence to: Dr. Naomi M. Fearon, Department of Bariatric Surgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol Trust, Bristol, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom. E-mail:
People with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergo more elective surgery than those without DM; however, up to half of the patients are undiagnosed when referred for surgery. This is an opportunity to intervene and instigate a management plan. Preoperative strategies may vary based on coexisting medical diseases such as obesity and the availability of resources with the aim of achieving glycaemic control while also treating coexisting conditions. In the context of obesity, there is substantial overlap in some of the treatment strategies. Guidelines, such as those from the UK Centre for Perioperative Medicine, suggest target glycated haemoglobin levels, preoperative fasting blood glucose levels, and when to defer an elective operation or instigate treatment to proceed if deemed safe. Preoperatively glycaemic control is often achieved pharmacologically, and newer agents, including glucagon-like peptide one receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, are emphasised in the preoperative management of diabetes mellitus, particularly if obesity is also present. A very low-energy diet is an underutilised but well-evidenced method of achieving both glycaemic control and weight loss with a particularly dominant effect on liver fat which is helpful for people who are due to undergo abdominal surgery. Bariatric-metabolic procedures are of growing interest as bridging interventions to surgery and are more commonly used for obesity, but they also have a well-recognized impact on the improvement and remission of DM. This review gives an overview of the necessity of preoperative identification of DM and strategies for management. Intra-operative glycaemic control is also discussed, and the role of stress hyperglycaemia perioperatively.
People with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergo more elective surgery due to macrovascular complications such as coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease and kidney disease. Up to 50% of people with DM require surgery, and patients referred for elective surgery may have a 50% higher prevalence than the general population. Furthermore, as the prevalence of obesity increases, this also contributes to the predicted increase in the prevalence of both diseases. Therefore, perioperative obesity and DM care must continue to improve and be seen as an opportunity to diagnose and instigate treatment for both the perioperative and long term[2,3].
Stress hyperglycaemia encompasses hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. Physiological changes include increased glucagon, adrenaline, cortisol, and growth hormone release leading to increased glucose levels due to increased hepatic production and insulin resistance. This induces increased oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokine release. These changes occur in people with and without DM, can occur after acute illness, injury, or surgery, and can be worse in those without DM. Stress hyperglycaemia is associated with increased complications, increased mortality, and a longer hospital stay. More recent data suggests this is not a causal effect and is likely an adaptive response to trauma to maintain glucose transport to vital tissues. This is supported by studies demonstrating that efforts to intensively manage glycaemic control during acute stress hyperglycaemia have been associated with worse clinical outcomes. Acute stress hyperglycaemia may be beneficial; however, data also shows that chronic hyperglycaemia leads to fluid shifts, renal overload, and fluid depletion. A stress hyperglycaemia ratio (SHR) evaluating relative hyperglycaemia has been explored by Roberts et al., who report SHR as an independent marker of critical illness. The authors found that the SHR was not different in people with glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of more or less than 6.5 mmol[7,8].
This review aims to outline interventions for T2DM to prevent stress hyperglycaemia in people with DM, particularly the use of very-low-energy diets, pharmacotherapy, and metabolic surgery as bridging interventions [Table 1]. Elective surgery usually allows time to optimise clinical status for safer surgery. Some strategies may also apply to people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and obesity, reducing insulin resistance and/or improving glucose control.
Role of different preoperative strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus
Can be given in combination and individualised for patients’ other co-morbidities, e.g., Obesity, Cardiovascular disease
Long term management
May require titration
Variations in cost and accessibility
|Very-low-energy diet||Low/moderate||Low||Non-invasive, non-pharmacological||Requires a high level of patient commitment
Not well understood or widely supported
Can be expensive
Eg, IGB, SG
|Low||High||Potentially long-term remission/improvement (sleeve gastrectomy)||Cost
IGB - short term
Perioperative DM care is variable and often suboptimal. Furthermore, approximately 50% of people with DM are undiagnosed; therefore, improving efforts to identify and instigate early treatment is crucial to preventing long-term complications. There is global variation in criteria for diagnosis of DM and pre-DM and variations in measurements and standards used for diagnosis and remission; this has been highlighted as a particular safety issue in reporting for diabetic ketoacidosis. Previous studies have shown that people with preoperatively diagnosed DM have better perioperative outcomes than those with unidentified hyperglycaemia[11,12]. This reflects an improvement in glycaemic status and optimisation of other coexistent diseases, such as cardiovascular disease. This is likely due to better control of other modifiable risk factors and optimisation of coexistent conditions leading to a lower risk of acute myocardial infarction.
People with DM have a longer length of stay and higher postoperative complication rates than those without DM. A comprehensive care pathway from the UK Centre for Perioperative Care (CPOC) was published in March 2021 and provides guidelines on all aspects of care, from referral to discharge planning for people with DM.
Prehabilitation before elective surgery (both for benign disease and cancer) is continuing to develop and become a tool to improve postoperative outcomes. It may involve a single focus, such as a physical exercise program, or it may be a multimodal program implementing changes in exercise, nutrition, and provision of psychological support, with the intent to improve the persons’ functional capacity before surgery and prepare them for the emotional and physical stress of surgery.
Preoperative optimisation of people with DM (both Type 1 and Type 2) needs to be carefully considered in the context of other co-morbidities, such as obesity, cardiovascular disease and hypertension. Initiating treatment can lead to hypoglycemic episodes, and there is an ongoing debate about the optimal target range for capillary glucose levels, particularly perioperatively. The accepted preoperative HbA1c target above which complications are more likely is 43 mmol/mol, and the point at which surgery should be postponed is ≥ 69 mmol/mol (UK). The evidence is mixed for determining the impact of HbA1c on postoperative morbidity and mortality; a number of meta-analyses in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery have shown a trend toward increased complications; however, there was significant heterogeneity in the included studies making it challenging to determine any definitive conclusions[17,18]. An overview of studies of preoperative bridging interventions is provided in Table 2. A major limitation is that surgical outcomes following the intervention are not provided.
Studies of preoperative interventions for patients with diabetes mellitus
|Author, year||Type of study||Patients included||Intervention||Period of intervention||Outcomes|
|Houlden, 2017||Observational, retrospective||75 patients with T2DM and severe obesity listed for bariatric surgery
Mean age 51 ± 8.3 yrs
Mean weight 134.4 ± 29.2 kg
Mean BMI 48.2 ± 8.3 kg
Mean HbA1c 9.0% ± 1.2%
|Glycaemic optimization clinic
- Medication adjustment (anti-obesity medications preferentially selected)
- Nutritional support
- Exercise prescription
|5 months||75% reached HbA1c < 7.5%
Mean absolute decrease in HbA1c 18.2 +/- 11.6% (range 1%-41%)
Mean absolutely change in wt 1.9 +/- 8 kg (range
Post-operative outcomes not reported
|Holt, 2021||Open pilot feasibility study||17 patients with suboptimally managed T2DM (HbA1c
Listed for Cardiothoracic surgery
|Nurse-led preoperative clinic
- Glucose management
- Lipid management
- Hypertension management
- Exercise program
- Smoking cessation
|Approximately 3 months until 2 weeks postoperatively||- Median HbA1c was 10 mmol/mol (IQR -13, -3) lower prior to surgery than at baseline
2.5 kg reduction in body weight (IQR -5, -1 kg)
4.1 cm (-5.3, -2.0) reduction in waist circumference
- no change in blood pressure, lipid profile or renal function
|Garg, 2018||Observational, retrospective||All patients with T2DM included (3909 patients)
Patients with HbA1c > 8% referred to diabetes specialists
|Clinical program for preoperative diabetes management
- Increasing the frequency of bg testing
- Adjusting oral medications
- Adjusting insulin
|Variable, not specified||LOS reduced from 4.78 ± 5.23 days to 4.62 ± 4.28
HbA1c measurement at the time of preoperative visit increased from 31% to 69%
More patients were admitted to ICU after the implementation of the program (regardless of diabetic status)
Mean bg on the day of surgery was 146.4 ± 51.9 mg/dL before the program and 139.9 45.6 mg/dL after the program (P = 0.0028)
Fewer patients presented with bg > 200 mg/dL after the program
32.5% of patients received a diabetes consultation during their hospital stay, compared with 13.2% of patients before the program
Mean bg level during the hospital stay was 166.7 ± 42.9 mg/dL before and 158.3 ± 46.6 mg/dL after the program (P < 0.0001)
Number of patients with ≥ 1 hypoglycemic episode(< 50 mg/dL) was lower after the program (2.48%) than before the program (4.93%)
|Lee, 2019||Meta-analysis||13 studies including 550 patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 (mean baseline BMI of 61.26 kg/m2)
Underwent bridging intervention prior to definitive bariatric surgery
|Bridging interventions included
- First-step laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)
- Intragastric balloon (IGB)
- Liquid low-calorie diet program (LLCD)
|Variable, not specified
||In studies that reported comorbidity prevalence, there was 48 out of 62 (68%) remission or improvement in T2DM. Details not reported
LSG - significant change in BMI (pooled mean difference 15.2 kg/m2, 95% CI 12.9 to 17.5,
LLCD - significant change in BMI (pooled mean difference 9.8 kg/m2, 95%CI 9.82 to 15.4,
IGB – non-significant change in BMI (pooled mean difference 10.8 kg, 95%CI -1.5 to 23.1, P = 0.08)
|Colles, 2006||Observational, prospective||32 patients (19 men and 13 women) due to undergo bariatric surgery
Mean (SD) age of 47.58 years
BMI 47.35 kg/m2
13 patients with T2DM
Requirements outlined by a dietitian at the start of program for all subjects attended fortnightly dietetic counselling
The VLED ended just prior to surgery
|12 weeks||All baseline descriptive characteristics for the 32 subjects decreased significantly:
Bodyweight decreased by 14.87.2 kg
BMI by 5.02.4
Patients with T2DM
Glycated hemoglobin A1c(%) reduced from 7.21.8 (5.6-12.7) to 6.31.1 (5-9.6)
|Griffin, 2020||Observational, retrospective,||78 patients due to undergo bariatric surgery who underwent a VLED preoperatively
16 patients with T2DM
|Dependent on age and ability to adhere to dietary restrictions, patients were placed on a VLED of either 800 kcals, 900 kcals or 1200 kcals
- Fortnightly dietitian appointments
- Monitoring of weight, dietary intake and side effects
- Encouragement of structured physical activity based on physical limitations and lifestyle factors
- Education on progression to general healthy eating after treatment
|12 weeks||Median Hba1c (%) reduced - median (range) 7.0 (6.4-10) down to 6.4 (6.1-7.7)
Mean body mass index (kg/m2), mean (SD) 44.3 (6.2) down to 41 (6.1) P < 0.001*
|Lips, 2006||Observational, prospective||27 patients with severe obesity and T2DM
An age-matched group of lean women (n = 12) was studied as the control group
lean: 47 ± 7 years
obesity: 52 ± 6 years
|15 patients underwent bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass)
12 patients were prescribed a very-low-calorie diet (VLCD) with an average calorie intake of 600 kcal/day
Systemic inflammation was assessed one month before and three months after RYGB (n = 15) or VLCD (n = 12)
|3 months||At baseline, body weight, BMI, insulin, glucose, HOMA-IR and HbA1c were higher in the patients with obesity than in the lean controls
Three months after the intervention
- Body weight and BMI markedly reduced both by RYGB and VLCD
- BMI reduction was slightly larger in the RYGB group
- Insulin and glucose levels, as well as HOMA-IR and HbA1c, were reduced to the same extent by both interventions
|Pournaras, 2016||RCT||Fifteen patients aged 47.9 years were included
- 8 female (53%)
- Mean BMI 41.34 kg/m2
|Patients were randomized to either 2 weeks of VLED before surgery (n = 7) or normal diet before surgery(n = 8)
VLCD = 800 kcal, including 70 g of protein, 15 g of fat, and 100 g of carbohydrates, plus the recommended daily allowance of essential vitamins, minerals, and trace elements
|2 weeks preoperatively||2 weeks after VLED
-4.83 kg (range: 1.7-10.4) weight loss compared to 0.71 kg (range: +0.5 kg to -2.5 kg) in the normal diet (ND) group (P = ns)
Whole body insulin sensitivity values improved by 45%, while no difference was seen in ND
Antidiabetic treatment - no difference between the groups at any time point
Insulin sensitivity (M) improved by 45%, while no difference was seen in ND
2 weeks after RYGB
ND group reported an improvement matching the level of the VLED group, while no further increase in M was seen in the VLED group
1 year after RYGB
Equal increase in M values was seen in both groups
Signiﬁcant correlation between M and weight for both groups
Currently, The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines do not recommend screening surgical patients; however, the CPOC guidelines suggest that preoperative assessment should include an HbA1c check for all everyone, thus allowing identification of people with undiagnosed T2DM and a reflection of glycaemic control for those who already had a diagnosis of T2DM. A retrospective study from Garg et al. demonstrated the benefits of implementing a preoperative DM program. A simple HbA1c check at a preoperative appointment followed by referral for those with HbA1c > 8% and access to a postoperative diabetes service improved identification of T2DM, led to more frequent monitoring of blood glucose levels and fewer episodes of inpatient hypoglycaemia (4.93% down to 2.48%), and reduced length of stay.
A very-low-energy diet (VLED) can improve glycaemic control and has been utilised as an isolated intervention or as a preoperative bridging intervention before elective surgery. A number of randomised trials have demonstrated the efficacy of a medically supervised VLED with up to 60% remission of T2DM after 12 months and 30% after 24 months. Younger people with a shorter duration of T2DM are most likely to achieve remission, and the improvement in glycaemic control seems to happen very soon after the commencement of the VLED, indicating that the initial improvement is weight loss independent. Weight loss maintenance does not directly correlate with remission of T2DM, indicating a non-linear relationship.
A recent sub-analysis of the multicentre Almased Concept Against Overweight and Obesity and Related Health Risk (ACOORH) trial showed that longer-term insulin reduction correlated with weight reduction, and people with obesity who undertook a phased 24 weeks high glycaemic, low-energy diet involving three meals per day reduced their insulin levels significantly more than those who received nutritional advice and monitoring only. The profound impact of calorie restriction was further demonstrated by Pournaras et al. They randomised people with T2DM undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to either an 800 calorie/day preoperative diet or no preoperative diet (ND). After two weeks, the VLED group had significantly improved whole-body insulin sensitivity. Two weeks post RYGB, both groups showed similar improvements in whole-body insulin sensitivity. However, the VLED group did not demonstrate much further improvement than what had been achieved after the VLED.
A VLED can be used as a preoperative ‘liver shrink’ diet to enable liver retraction and safer exposure for upper gastrointestinal surgery. Colles et al. used serial imaging to demonstrate a significant reduction in liver volume (LV), visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 while a VLED was followed. The overall relative reduction in LV, VAT and SAT was 18.7%, 16.9% and 17.7%, respectively. This correlated with a significant decrease in fasting insulin, HbA1c and cholesterol. After two weeks, 80% of the reduction in LV occurred. The VLED was composed of shakes which amounted to 456-680 kcal/day. People who were due to undergo laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery were enrolled. A systematic review from 2016 included 15 studies that looked at VLED before surgery (> 80% bariatric surgery) and included people with and without T2DM. There was high variation in the included studies. Still, an overall high compliance rate was tolerated. A 5%-10% total weight loss and > 10% reduction in LV were shown, reflecting an overall improvement in metabolic status, including improved insulin resistance and blood glucose levels. The impact on perioperative hyperglycaemia was not measured/reported. The complex interaction between NAFLD and DM is highlighted by the frequent coexistence of the two diseases. The prevalence of NAFLD is doubled in those with T2DM, and they also have a much higher incidence of complications such as cirrhosis and the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Stefan and Cusi outline three mechanisms for developing NAFLD, including a strong genetic component whereby specific genetic variants are associated with both severe and complicated forms of NAFLD and DM and dyslipidaemia. A second mechanism is increased hepatic de-novo lipogenesis, which may occur in hyperglycaemia, leading to increased insulin resistance and an overall worse cardiometabolic status due to hepatic inflammation and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Both mechanisms are important in the interplay of NAFLD and DM and the differences in the management approaches. The third mechanism is adipose tissue dysfunction leading to increased free fatty acids and dysfunction in adipokine and cytokine release leading to increased hepatic inflammation. Both the metabolic and anthropometrical improvements associated with a VLED are beneficial for any subsequent intra-abdominal operation, particularly where liver retraction is undertaken.
Griffin et al. provide observational and qualitative data on their dietitian-led VLED model of care for non-bariatric elective surgery, most of which was gynaecological surgery. There was high acceptance and satisfaction from participants and surgeons. There was a mean of 7.3% weight loss (P < 0.001), and although HbA1c levels trended down, it was not significant. Interestingly nearly 20% of participants were excluded due to non-engagement in the program. The reasons were not specified; however, this is likely to be a typical finding in any VLED program and leads to consideration of inpatient programs that may be more attractive or more accessible for those who find it challenging to engage. Ruggenenti et al. randomised people with overweight/obesity and T2DM to either a 25% calorie restriction (CR) or standard diet. There was a significant improvement in the glomerular filtration rate at six months compared to a regular diet. The CR group also demonstrated improved HbA1c, blood glucose, and insulin sensitivity (measured by glucose disposal rate).
Despite several studies showing the feasibility and benefit of a VLED, it is not commonly used preoperatively. This is likely due to a lack of awareness from the surgical teams and under-resourcing of the dietetic and endocrinology teams, who promote and support the intervention. However, with education and clear instructions, most people can carry out a VLED for a very short period. A collaborative, interdisciplinary approach for those undergoing surgery may allow identification of T2DM and, if present, facilitate access to resources to manage the disease with a focus on preoperatively and longer-term integrated care.
Currently, pharmacotherapy is the mainstay in the management of T2DM. An overview of available pharmacotherapy is provided in Figure 1. Variation in preoperative management is still evident; however, several recent high-quality studies contribute to the evidence base for instigating certain oral hypoglycaemics preoperatively. A feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) from the OCTOPuS study group included people with DM and an HbA1c > 53 mml/mol (or ≥ 64 mmol/mol in those more than 75 years old) who were due to undergo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Several preoperative interventions were implemented, including pharmacotherapy. The emphasis was on initiating a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor or a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonist, which has cardiovascular benefits. The median HbA1c was 10 mmol lower than that before the intervention.
Figure 1. The ominous octet shows mechanism and site of action of medications that are used to achieve glycaemic control. GLP-1 RA: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; TZD: thiazolidinedione; SGLT2i: sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor; HGP: hepatic glucose production; MET: metformin; DPP-4i: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor.
Insulin remains the primary treatment for T1DM, and either as monotherapy or part of combination therapy for T2DM, oral or injectable non-insulin therapies have been unable to achieve glycemic control. The CPOC guidelines outline the dosage adjustments for each type and formulation of insulin in the preoperative period.
Obesity is a risk factor for T2DM, and there is an overlap in pharmacotherapy to optimise both diseases preoperatively. In particular, GLP1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors have good efficacy, proven cardiovascular benefits, and an acceptable safety profile. Houlden et al. showed that preoperative interdisciplinary management of DM reduced HbA1c from a mean level of 9.0% ± 1.2% to ≤ 7.5% in three-quarters of people five months before bariatric surgery. The individualised treatment emphasised oral hypoglycaemics that were weight neutral or associated with weight loss, and all participants received nutritional counselling. They had weekly phone calls and monthly reviews with the interdisciplinary team, highlighting the benefit of outpatient support. Newer treatments in this area include Tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, which has shown to be more efficacious in the treatment of T2DM compared to semaglutide, and in the treatment of obesity compared to placebo, in randomised studies[32,33]. Therefore, a short-term course of treatment such as a GLP1 receptor agonist, which reduces HbA1c and facilitates weight loss, will be a cost-effective intervention when balanced with the overall reduced perioperative costs.
A meta-analysis of fifteen RCTs showed a mean reduction in HbA1c of 2% after bariatric surgery compared to 0.5% after best medical treatment. Several studies are exploring the role of sleeve gastrectomy as a bridging intervention to another surgical procedure. A meta-analysis from Lee et al. evaluated people with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 who underwent either sleeve gastrectomy (SG), liquid low-calorie diet (LLCD), or intragastric balloon (IGB) before RYGB. Those who underwent SG dropped their BMI significantly more than LLCD; those with an IGB did not lose significant weight (although only two studies were included). Remission or improvement in T2DM was reported in 63% of people; however, there were only 62 people with T2DM, and the criteria for remission were not outlined.
The IGB is placed endoscopically, under sedation or general anaesthetic, and can be left in situ for up to 12 months (depending on the manufacturer). Most people experience gastrointestinal side effects, and some do not tolerate it. A recent meta-analysis including 13 RCTs and 1523 people showed a significant difference in weight (4.4%, 6.1 kg) and BMI (2.13 kg/m2) between the IGB and control groups (placement time three to eight months). A recent study from Abu Dayyeh et al. randomised participants to either an adjustable IGB and a lifestyle intervention program or a lifestyle intervention program alone. Participants had the adjustable IGB for eight months and were followed up for six months. They underwent endoscopic adjustments during the eight months, depending on their intolerance symptoms and weight loss. The average weight loss in the IGB group was 15% compared to 3.3% in the diet and exercise group alone. A small subgroup of participants with T2DM had an improvement of 0.73% in HbA1c. Importantly, volume adjustment at the 18-week point prevented the removal of 75% of IGB in those who reported intolerance symptoms. Unfortunately, it remains the case that these devices are only suitable for short-term use, and the likelihood of long-term weight regain is high; however, they remain a good option for short-term weight loss and improvement in glycaemic control and improvements in tolerability are to be welcomed. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty may be another option as a bridging intervention; Zorron et al. describe a case series whereby they include bridging to renal or liver transplant as an indication for ESG. Unfortunately, the details of subsequent procedures and outcomes are not reported. The Multicentre Randomised ESG Trial (MERIT) recently reported a mean percentage of total body weight loss of 13.6% (8.0) after ESG at 52 weeks and 0.8% (5.0) for the control group (P < 0.0001). Secondary outcomes included co-morbidities, and the authors report significant improvement in fasting glucose concentrations, HOMA-IR and HbA c levels in the ESG group compared to the control group. Furthermore, 25 (93%) of 27 participants in the ESG group, compared with only four (15%) of 27 participants in the control group, reported a clinical improvement in DM.
There has been recent discussion about proceeding with bariatric surgery in the context of poor glycaemic control and a high HbA1c as improvement or remission in T2DM is an intrinsic benefit of metabolic surgery, and a large observational study from Albaugh et al. showed no difference in outcomes for people undergoing bariatric surgery who had a higher HbA1c. The mean preoperative HbA1c was 8.2 +/- 2.7% (66 +/- 29.5 mmol/mol) for the entire cohort; the outcomes of interest were a composite of major complications, a composite of infectious complications, length of stay > 5 days, re-admission within 30 days and re-operation within 30 days.
The literature around the management of perioperative glycaemia is evolving. Several randomised control trials have been published evaluating perioperative glucose targets for cardiac surgery. This high-risk surgical group provides a setting where it is feasible to randomise fewer people due to the increased power to detect a difference. The GLUCO-CABG trial randomised people with and without T2DM to either a conservative or intensive glucose target. In participants with T2DM, there was no difference in the composite complication score; however, in those without T2DM (48% vs. 49%), there was a lower complication score in the intensive glucose target group (34% vs. 55%). A subsequent pilot RCT randomised 60 people without T2DM to preoperative (24 h beforehand) sitagliptin or placebo and found no impact on perioperative hyperglycaemia and the need for insulin therapy. These outcomes appear to apply to non-cardiac surgery, where observational studies show similar findings. A retrospective study from van den Boom et al. has shown that HbA1c is a good predictor of perioperative glucose levels in both cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. However, it has challenged the evidence on HbA1c as a predictive marker for 30-day mortality. Observational studies have shown that people with T2DM undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy are 17% more likely to have a more than three-day stay if preoperative glucose levels were ≥ 128 mg/dL (taken within 48 h before surgery). This has also been shown for elective laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cancer and elective orthopaedic, colorectal and breast surgery[45-49]. Liraglutide, a GLP1 receptor agonist, has been suggested as a possible perioperative agent as an alternative to insulin in cardiac and non-cardiac surgery and can reduce the amount of insulin required on the day of surgery[50-52]. In contrast, guidelines around the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are clear that these medications should be stopped three days before surgery and should not be used in critical illness, prolonged fasting status, ketonuria, or ketonemia.
In general, pre-operative hyperglycaemia does not require surgery cancellation except in diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar nonketotic states, which may be confirmed with further biochemistry testing and require specific management. However, the person should be started on an insulin infusion with additional monitoring of blood glucose levels and could proceed to surgery if levels were below 16.6 mmol/mol.
Insulin use perioperatively is clearly outlined in CPOC guidelines, and up-to-date information can be found in the perioperative handbook provided by the Clinical Pharmacy Association. In randomised studies, insulin delivery intraoperatively is of predominant interest, with options such as fully closed-loop insulin delivery showing promising outcomes for people with T2DM. Studies have shown that response to intra-operative delivery of insulin cannot be predicted based on diabetic status or previous use of insulin and does not appear to correlate with the presence of obesity or metabolic syndrome. Duggan and Chen provide a comprehensive review of intra-operative glycaemic control. Epidural anaesthesia is associated with reduced intra-operative blood glucose levels, and different types of general anaesthesia, particularly total intravenous anaesthesia, are associated with better glycaemic control intra-operatively.
Improving perioperative glycaemic control starts with identifying, screening, and standardising criteria for safe elective surgery. Strategies for improving preoperative glycaemia and insulin resistance include calorie restriction, newer oral and injectable medications, and bariatric-metabolic surgery interventions such as intragastric balloons. The best strategy for each person should be based on other medical complications, their circumstances and wishes, and the availability of local resources and treatments. Further research could focus on the impact of these interventions on important clinical outcomes such as re-operation rates and mortality.
Contribution to the writing and editing of the manuscript: Fearon NM, Pournaras DJAvailability of data and materials
Not applicable.Financial support and sponsorship
None.Conflicts of interest
Pournaras DJ has received consulting fees from Johnson and Johnson, in addition to payments for lecturing and education events from Johnson and Johnson, Medtronic and Novo Nordisk.Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.Consent for publication
© The Author(s) 2022.
1. Pournaras DJ, Photi ES, Barnett N, et al. Assessing the quality of primary care referrals to surgery of patients with diabetes in the East of England: a multi-centre cross-sectional cohort study. Int J Clin Pract 2017;71:e12971.
2. Meneghini LF. Perioperative management of diabetes: translating evidence into practice. Cleve Clin J Med 2009;76 Suppl 4:S53-9.
4. Stentz FB, Umpierrez GE, Cuervo R, Kitabchi AE. Proinflammatory cytokines, markers of cardiovascular risks, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation in patients with hyperglycemic crises. Diabetes 2004;53:2079-86.
5. Marik PE, Bellomo R. Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response! Crit Care 2013;17:305.
6. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1283-97.
7. Fabbri A, Marchesini G, Benazzi B, et al. Stress hyperglycemia and mortality in subjects with diabetes and sepsis. Crit Care Explor 2020;2:e0152.
8. Roberts GW, Quinn SJ, Valentine N, et al. Relative hyperglycemia, a marker of critical Illness: introducing the stress hyperglycemia ratio. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015;100:4490-7.
9. International Diabetes Federation. IDF atlas, 10th edition 2021. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/ [Last accessed on 1 Sep 2022].
10. Dhatariya KK. Why the definitions used to diagnose diabetic ketoacidosis should be standardised. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;135:227-8.
11. Kwon S, Thompson R, Dellinger P, Yanez D, Farrohki E, Flum D. Importance of perioperative glycemic control in general surgery: a report from the Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program. Ann Surg 2013;257:8-14.
12. Frisch A, Chandra P, Smiley D, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of hyperglycemia in the perioperative period in noncardiac surgery. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1783-8.
13. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018;379:633-44.
14. Centre for Perioperative Care. Guideline for perioperative care for people with diabetes mellitus undergoing elective and emergency surgery, 2021. Available from: https://diabetes-resources-production.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/resources-s3/public/2021-03/CPOC-Diabetes-Guideline2021.pdf [Last accessed on 1 Sep 2022].
15. Gillis C, Ljungqvist O, Carli F. Prehabilitation, enhanced recovery after surgery, or both? Br J Anaesth 2022;128:434-48.
16. Levy N, Dhatariya K. Pre-operative optimisation of the surgical patient with diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes: a practical review. Anaesthesia 2019;74 Suppl 1:58-66.
17. Rollins KE, Varadhan KK, Dhatariya K, Lobo DN. Systematic review of the impact of HbA1c on outcomes following surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. Clin Nutr 2016;35:308-16.
18. Wang J, Luo X, Jin X, et al. Effects of preoperative HbA1c levels on the postoperative outcomes of coronary artery disease surgical treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus and nondiabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res 2020;2020:3547491.
19. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery (NG45) 2016. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng45 [Last accessed on 1 Sep 2022].
20. Garg R, Schuman B, Bader A, et al. Effect of preoperative diabetes management on glycemic control and clinical outcomes after elective surgery. Ann Surg 2018;267:858-62.
21. Juray S, Axen KV, Trasino SE. Remission of type 2 diabetes with very low-calorie diets-a narrative review. Nutrients 2021;13:2086.
22. Kempf K, Röhling M, Banzer W, et al. High-Protein, Low-glycaemic meal replacement decreases fasting insulin and inflammation markers-a 12-month subanalysis of the ACOORH trial. Nutrients 2021;13:1433.
23. Pournaras DJ, Nygren J, Hagström-Toft E, Arner P, le Roux CW, Thorell A. Improved glucose metabolism after gastric bypass: evolution of the paradigm. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1457-65.
24. Colles SL, Dixon JB, Marks P, Strauss BJ, O'Brien PE. Preoperative weight loss with a very-low-energy diet: quantitation of changes in liver and abdominal fat by serial imaging. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:304-11.
25. Ross LJ, Wallin S, Osland EJ, Memon MA. Commercial very low energy meal replacements for preoperative weight loss in obese patients: a systematic review. Obes Surg 2016;26:1343-51.
26. Stefan N, Cusi K. A global view of the interplay between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2022;10:284-96.
27. Griffin SB, Ross LJ, Burstow MJ, Desbrow B, Palmer MA. Efficacy of a dietitian-led very low calorie diet (VLCD) based model of care to facilitate weight loss for obese patients prior to elective, non-bariatric surgery. J Hum Nutr Diet 2021;34:188-98.
28. Ruggenenti P, Abbate M, Ruggiero B, et al. C. RE.S.O. Study Group. Renal and systemic effects of calorie restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes with abdominal obesity: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes 2017;66:75-86.
29. Holt RIG, Barnard-Kelly K, Dritsakis G, et al. OCTOPuS study group. Developing an intervention to optimise the outcome of cardiac surgery in people with diabetes: the OCTOPuS pilot study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021;7:157.
30. Li S, Vandvik PO, Lytvyn L, et al. SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists for adults with type 2 diabetes: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ 2021;373:n1091.
31. Houlden RL, Yen JL, Moore S. Effectiveness of an interprofessional glycemic optimization clinic on preoperative glycated hemoglobin levels for adult patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing bariatric surgery. Can J Diabetes 2018;42:514-9.
32. Frías JP, Davies MJ, Rosenstock J, et al. SURPASS-2 Investigators. Tirzepatide versus semaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2021;385:503-15.
33. Jastreboff AM, Aronne LJ, Ahmad NN, et al. SURMOUNT-1 Investigators. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med 2022;387:205-16.
34. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for type 2 diabetes: a joint statement by international diabetes organizations. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2016;12:1144-62.
35. Lee Y, Dang JT, Switzer N, Malhan R, Birch DW, Karmali S. Bridging interventions before bariatric surgery in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2019;33:3578-88.
36. Kotinda APST, de Moura DTH, Ribeiro IB, et al. Efficacy of intragastric balloons for weight loss in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Surg 2020;30:2743-53.
37. Abu Dayyeh BK, Maselli DB, Rapaka B, et al. Adjustable intragastric balloon for treatment of obesity: a multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial. Lancet 2021;398:1965-73.
38. Zorron R, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Adler A, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty using Apollo Overstitch as a bridging procedure for superobese and high risk patients. Endoscopy 2018;50:81-3.
39. Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet 2022;400:441-51.
40. Albaugh VL, Sharma G, Tu C, Aminian A. Clinical significance of diabetes control before metabolic surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021;17:1271-8.
41. Umpierrez G, Cardona S, Pasquel F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intensive versus conservative glucose control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: GLUCO-CABG trial. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1665-72.
42. Cardona S, Tsegka K, Pasquel FJ, et al. Sitagliptin for the prevention of stress hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2019;7:e000703.
43. van den Boom W, Schroeder RA, Manning MW, Setji TL, Fiestan GO, Dunson DB. Effect of A1C and glucose on postoperative mortality in noncardiac and cardiac surgeries. Diabetes Care 2018;41:782-8.
44. Chiang HY, Lin KR, Hsiao YL, et al. Association between preoperative blood glucose level and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing appendectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Diabetes Care 2021;44:107-15.
45. He T, Zhu W, Wang C, et al. Relationship between pre-operative blood glucose level and length of hospital stay in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy. Front Surg 2021;8:659365.
46. Domek N, Dux K, Pinzur M, Weaver F, Rogers T. Association between hemoglobin a1c and surgical morbidity in elective foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg 2016;55:939-43.
47. Gustafsson UO, Thorell A, Soop M, Ljungqvist O, Nygren J. Haemoglobin A1c as a predictor of postoperative hyperglycaemia and complications after major colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2009;96:1358-64.
48. O'Sullivan CJ, Hynes N, Mahendran B, et al. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) in non-diabetic and diabetic vascular patients. Is HbA1C an independent risk factor and predictor of adverse outcome? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006;32:188-97.
49. Vilar-Compte D, Alvarez de Iturbe I, Martín-Onraet A, Pérez-Amador M, Sánchez-Hernández C, Volkow P. Hyperglycemia as a risk factor for surgical site infections in patients undergoing mastectomy. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:192-8.
50. Makino H, Tanaka A, Asakura K, et al. Addition of low-dose liraglutide to insulin therapy is useful for glycaemic control during the peri-operative period: effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy on glycaemic control in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (GLOLIA study). Diabet Med 2019;36:1621-8.
51. Hulst AH, Visscher MJ, Godfried MB, et al. GLOBE Study Group. Liraglutide for perioperative management of hyperglycaemia in cardiac surgery patients: a multicentre randomized superiority trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2020;22:557-65.
52. Kaneko S, Ueda Y, Tahara Y. GLP1 receptor agonist liraglutide is an effective therapeutic option for perioperative glycemic control in type 2 diabetes within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. Eur Surg Res 2018;59:349-60.
53. Draznin B, Aroda VR, Bakris G, et al. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. , American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee:. 16. Diabetes care in the hospital: standards of medical care in diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care 2022;45:S244-53.
54. Duggan E, Chen Y. Glycemic management in the operating room: screening, monitoring, oral hypoglycemics, and insulin therapy. Curr Diab Rep 2019;19:134.
55. Clinical Pharmacy Association. Perioperative Handbook 2022. Available from: https://www.ukcpa-periophandbook.co.uk/ [Last accessed on 1 Sep 2022].
Cite This Article
Fearon NM, Pournaras DJ. Glycaemic control strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective surgery. Metab Target Organ Damage 2022;2:13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mtod.2022.12
Fearon NM, Pournaras DJ. Glycaemic control strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective surgery. Metabolism and Target Organ Damage. 2022; 2(3): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mtod.2022.12
Fearon, Naomi M., Dimitri J. Pournaras. 2022. "Glycaemic control strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective surgery" Metabolism and Target Organ Damage. 2, no.3: 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mtod.2022.12
Fearon, NM.; Pournaras DJ. Glycaemic control strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing elective surgery. Metab Target Organ Damage. 2022, 2, 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mtod.2022.12
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at email@example.com.