fig3

Taxonomic and mechanistic insights into gut microbiota bioaccumulation of entacapone using bioorthogonal drug labelling

Figure 3. Faecal microbial taxa significantly affected by entacapone and its derivatives. (A) Heatmap depicting genera differentially abundant across treatment conditions (entacaponeS, EB-11-24, EB-11-38) for each donor, faceted by rows. The x-axis represents microbial genera that were significantly decreased under each treatment compared to no-drug (log2FC < -1, Padjusted < 0.05, DESeq2 analysis), while the y-axis represents the respective treatment; (B) Genera that were significantly increased in abundance under each treatment condition relative to the no-drug control (log2FC > 1, Padjusted < 0.05, DESeq2 analysis), across all donors. In A and B, point size indicates the average abundance (base mean), and colour represents log2FC with values capped at < -5 and > 5 to enhance visual clarity. “i.s.”: incertae sedis; (C) Bar plot depicting the number of ASVs either positively or negatively affected by each treatment across individual donors. The x-axis indicates the direction of impact, while the y-axis represents the number of significantly affected ASVs. Bars are coloured by drug treatment; (D) Venn diagrams illustrating the number of affected ASVs unique to entacaponeS (yellow), EB-11-24 (purple), EB-11-38 (blue), and shared between the conditions. Total ASV counts per donor are indicated. ASV: Amplicon sequence variant.

Microbiome Research Reports
ISSN 2771-5965 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/