REFERENCES

1. Pasta, M.; Armstrong, D.; Brown, Z. L.; et al. 2020 roadmap on solid-state batteries. J. Phys. Energy. 2020, 2, 032008.

2. Janek, J.; Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1, BFnenergy2016141.

3. Cheng, E. J.; Duan, H.; Wang, M. J.; et al. Li-stuffed garnet solid electrolytes: current status, challenges, and perspectives for practical Li-metal batteries. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2025, 75, 103970.

4. Ren, Y.; Danner, T.; Moy, A.; et al. Oxide-based solid-state batteries: a perspective on composite cathode architecture. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2023, 13, 2201939.

5. Minnmann, P.; Strauss, F.; Bielefeld, A.; et al. Designing cathodes and cathode active materials for solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2022, 12, 2201425.

6. Naik, K. G.; Vishnugopi, B. S.; Mukherjee, P. P. Kinetics or transport: whither goes the solid-state battery cathode? ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 29754-65.

7. Zhao, H.; Mo, H.; Mao, P.; Ran, R.; Zhou, W.; Liao, K. Tape-casting fabrication techniques for garnet-based membranes in solid-state lithium-metal batteries: a comprehensive review. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 68772-93.

8. Ye, R.; Ihrig, M.; Figgemeier, E.; Fattakhova-rohlfing, D.; Finsterbusch, M. Aqueous Processing of LiCoO₂-Li_6.6La₃Zr_1.6Ta_0.4O₁₂ composite cathode for high-capacity solid-state lithium batteries. ACS. Sustainable. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 5184-94.

9. Cha, J.; Kim, S.; Nakate, U. T.; Kim, D. Highly conductive composite cathode prepared by dry process using Nafion-Li ionomer for sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium batteries. J. Power. Sources. 2024, 613, 234914.

10. Shin, D.; Nam, J. S.; Linh Nguyen, C. T.; et al. Design of densified nickel-rich layered composite cathode via the dry-film process for sulfide-based solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 23222-31.

11. Mun, J.; Song, T.; Park, M. S.; Kim, J. H. Paving the way for next-generation all-solid-state batteries: dry electrode technology. Adv. Mater. 2025, 2506123.

12. Schumm, B.; Dupuy, A.; Lux, M.; et al. Dry battery electrode technology: from early concepts to industrial applications. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2025, 15, 2406011.

13. Hammons, J. A.; Espitia, J. A.; Ramos, E.; et al. Pore and grain chemistry during sintering of garnet-type Li_6.4La₃Zr_1.4Ta_0.6O₁₂ solid-state electrolytes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10-90.

14. Wood, M.; Gao, X.; Shi, R.; et al. Exploring the relationship between solvent-assisted ball milling, particle size, and sintering temperature in garnet-type solid electrolytes. J. Power. Sources. 2021, 484, 229252.

15. Zhang, W.; Weber, D. A.; Weigand, H.; et al. Interfacial processes and influence of composite cathode microstructure controlling the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 17835-45.

16. Strauss, F.; Bartsch, T.; de Biasi, L.; et al. Impact of cathode material particle size on the capacity of bulk-type all-solid-state batteries. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2018, 3, 992-6.

17. Zhou, K.; Lu, S.; Mish, C.; et al. Tailored cathode composite microstructure enables long cycle life at low pressure for all-solid-state batteries. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2025, 10, 966-74.

18. Bielefeld, A.; Weber, D. A.; Rueß, R.; Glavas, V.; Janek, J. Influence of lithium ion kinetics, particle morphology and voids on the electrochemical performance of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2022, 169, 020539.

19. Bielefeld, A.; Weber, D. A.; Janek, J. Microstructural modeling of composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019, 123, 1626-34.

20. Bielefeld, A.; Weber, D. A.; Janek, J. Modeling effective ionic conductivity and binder influence in composite cathodes for all-solid-state batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 12821-33.

21. Park, J.; Kim, D.; Appiah, W. A.; et al. Electrode design methodology for all-solid-state batteries: 3D structural analysis and performance prediction. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2019, 19, 124-9.

22. Park, J.; Kim, K. T.; Oh, D. Y.; et al. Digital Twin-driven all-solid-state battery: unraveling the physical and electrochemical behaviors. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 2001563.

23. Minnmann, P.; Schubert, J.; Kremer, S.; et al. Editors’ choice-visualizing the impact of the composite cathode microstructure and porosity on solid-state battery performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2024, 171, 060514.

24. Minnmann, P.; Quillman, L.; Burkhardt, S.; Richter, F. H.; Janek, J. Editors’ choice-quantifying the impact of charge transport bottlenecks in composite cathodes of all-solid-state batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2021, 168, 040537.

25. Schlautmann, E.; Weiß, A.; Maus, O.; et al. Impact of the solid electrolyte particle size distribution in sulfide-based solid-state battery composites. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2023, 13, 2302309.

26. Shi, T.; Tu, Q.; Tian, Y.; et al. High active material loading in all-solid-state battery electrode via particle size optimization. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 1902881.

27. Finsterbusch, M.; Danner, T.; Tsai, C. L.; Uhlenbruck, S.; Latz, A.; Guillon, O. High capacity garnet-based all-solid-state lithium batteries: fabrication and 3D-microstructure resolved modeling. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 22329-39.

28. Clausnitzer, M.; Mücke, R.; Al-jaljouli, F.; et al. Optimizing the composite cathode microstructure in all-solid-state batteries by structure-resolved simulations. Batteries. Supercaps. 2023, 6, e202300167.

29. Feng, L.; Wang, B.; Kim, K.; Wan, L. F.; Wood, B. C.; Heo, T. W. Machine-learning-assisted deciphering of microstructural effects on ionic transport in composite materials: a case study of Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂-LiCoO₂. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2024, 73, 103776.

30. Heo, T. W.; Grieder, A.; Wang, B.; et al. Microstructural impacts on ionic conductivity of oxide solid electrolytes from a combined atomistic-mesoscale approach. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 214.

31. Lagadec, M. F.; Zahn, R.; Müller, S.; Wood, V. Topological and network analysis of lithium ion battery components: the importance of pore space connectivity for cell operation. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 3194-200.

32. Ebner, M.; Chung, D.; García, R. E.; Wood, V. Tortuosity anisotropy in lithium-ion battery electrodes. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2014, 4, 1301278.

33. Hu, J. M.; Wang, B.; Ji, Y.; et al. Phase-field based multiscale modeling of heterogeneous solid electrolytes: applications to nanoporous Li₃PS₄. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 33341-50.

34. Ebner, M.; Wood, V. Tool for tortuosity estimation in lithium ion battery porous electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2015, 162, A3064-70.

35. Nakashima, Y.; Nakano, T. Steady-state local diffusive fluxes in porous geo-materials obtained by pore-scale simulations. Transp. Porous. Med. 2012, 93, 657-73.

36. Zahn, R.; Lagadec, M. F.; Wood, V. Transport in lithium ion batteries: reconciling impedance and structural analysis. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2017, 2, 2452-3.

37. Zhu, J.; Chen, L.; Shen, J.; Tikare, V. Computing the effective diffusivity using a spectral method. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2001, 311, 135-41.

38. Ashton, T. E.; Baker, P. J.; Sotelo-vazquez, C.; et al. Stoichiometrically driven disorder and local diffusion in NMC cathodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9, 10477-86.

39. Weiss, M.; Ruess, R.; Kasnatscheew, J.; et al. Fast charging of lithium-ion batteries: a review of materials aspects. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2021, 11, 2101126.

40. Yuan, M.; Liu, H.; Ran, F. Fast-charging cathode materials for lithium & sodium ion batteries. Mater. Today. 2023, 63, 360-79.

41. Bachman, J. C.; Muy, S.; Grimaud, A.; et al. Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: mechanisms and properties governing ion conduction. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 140-62.

42. Grieder, A. C.; Kim, K.; Wan, L. F.; Chapman, J.; Wood, B. C.; Adelstein, N. Effects of nonequilibrium atomic structure on ionic diffusivity in LLZO: a classical and machine learning molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024, 128, 8560-70.

43. Dive, A.; Kim, K.; Kang, S.; Wan, L. F.; Wood, B. C. First-principles evaluation of dopant impact on structural deformability and processability of Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 13762-72.

44. Kim, K.; Adelstein, N.; Dive, A.; et al. Probing degradation at solid-state battery interfaces using machine-learning interatomic potential. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2024, 73, 103842.

45. Kozinsky, B.; Akhade, S. A.; Hirel, P.; et al. Effects of sublattice symmetry and frustration on ionic transport in garnet solid electrolytes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2016, 116, 055901.

46. Abbas, I.; Tran, H. T.; Tran, T. T. N.; et al. GITT Limitations and EIS Insights into Kinetics of NMC622. Batteries 2025, 11, 234.

47. Jaberi, A.; Trudeau, M. L.; Song, J.; Gauvin, R. Study of lithium transport in NMC Layered oxide cathode material using multiscale computational approach. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2024, 7, 7724-36.

48. Wu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jung, Y.; Zhang, J. Three-dimensional phase field based finite element study on Li intercalation-induced stress in polycrystalline LiCoO₂. J. Power. Sources. 2015, 299, 57-65.

49. Kalnaus, S.; Sabau, A. S.; Tenhaeff, W. E.; Dudney, N. J.; Daniel, C. Design of composite polymer electrolytes for Li ion batteries based on mechanical stability criteria. J. Power. Sources. 2012, 201, 280-7.

50. Nan, C.; Smith, D. M. A.c. electrical properties of composite solid electrolytes. Mater. Sci. Eng. B. 1991, 10, 99-106.

51. Kim, K. J.; Rupp, J. L. M. All ceramic cathode composite design and manufacturing towards low interfacial resistance for garnet-based solid-state lithium batteries. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4930-45.

52. Chakrabarti, B. K.; Benguigui, L. G. Statistical physics of fracture and breakdown in disordered systems. Oxford University Press, 1997.

53. Balberg, I. I. Universal percolation-threshold limits in the continuum. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter. 1985, 31, 4053-5.

54. Nguyen, T.; Demortière, A.; Fleutot, B.; Delobel, B.; Delacourt, C.; Cooper, S. J. The electrode tortuosity factor: why the conventional tortuosity factor is not well suited for quantifying transport in porous Li-ion battery electrodes and what to use instead. npj. Comput. Mater. 2020, 6, 386.

55. Song, Y.; Heo, T. W. Mesoscale modeling and semi-analytical approach for the microstructure-aware effective thermal conductivity of porous polygranular materials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 235, 112808.

56. Demuth, T.; Fuchs, T.; Walther, F.; et al. Influence of the sintering temperature on LLZO-NCM cathode composites for solid-state batteries studied by transmission electron microscopy. Matter 2023, 6, 2324-39.

57. Wood, B. C.; Varley, J. B.; Kweon, K. E.; et al. Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2021, 379, 20190467.

58. Kiyek, V.; Schwab, C.; Scheld, W. S.; et al. Direct precursor route for the fabrication of LLZO composite cathodes for solid-state batteries. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2404682.

59. Yu, H.; Taha, D.; Thompson, T.; et al. Deformation and stresses in solid-state composite battery cathodes. J. Power. Sources. 2019, 440, 227116.

60. Heo, T. W.; Kang, S.; Wood, B. C. Mesoscale modeling approach for quantifying microstructure-aware micromechanical responses in metal hydrides. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2025, 8, 2103-18.

61. Tjaden, B.; Cooper, S. J.; Brett, D. J.; Kramer, D.; Shearing, P. R. On the origin and application of the Bruggeman correlation for analysing transport phenomena in electrochemical systems. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2016, 12, 44-51.

62. Brosa, Planella. F.; Ai, W.; Boyce, A. M.; et al. A continuum of physics-based lithium-ion battery models reviewed. Prog. Energy. 2022, 4, 042003.