REFERENCES
1. Zhao, Q.; Sun, Q.; Xin, S.; et al. High-strength titanium alloys for aerospace engineering applications: a review on melting-forging process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022, 845, 143260.
2. Cotton, J. D.; Briggs, R. D.; Boyer, R. R.; et al. State of the art in beta titanium alloys for airframe applications. JOM 2015, 67, 1281-303.
3. Yumak, N.; Aslantaş, K. A review on heat treatment efficiency in metastable β titanium alloys: the role of treatment process and parameters. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 15360-80.
4. Kang, L.; Yang, C. A review on high‐strength titanium alloys: microstructure, strengthening, and properties. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 21, 1801359.
5. Banerjee, D.; Williams, J. C. Perspectives on titanium science and technology, Acta Mater 2013;61:844-79.
6. Xu, X.; Dong, L.; Ba, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, R. Hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of beta C titanium alloy in β phase field. Trans. Nonferrous. Met. Soc. China. 2016, 26, 2874-82.
7. Nichul, U.; Khatirkar, R.; Dhole, A.; Hiwarkar, V. Cold compression behavior on the evolution of microstructure and texture in Beta C titanium alloy. J. Alloys. Compd. 2021, 887, 161400.
8. Zhao, T.; Ma, Y.; Li, X.; et al. Variation of dynamic recrystallization mechanism and development of an accurate constitutive model for β-C titanium alloy. J. Alloys. Compd. 2026, 1066, 188263.
9. Huang, L.; Li, C.; Li, C.; et al. Research progress on microstructure evolution and hot processing maps of high strength β titanium alloys during hot deformation. Trans. Nonferrous. Met. Soc. China. 2022, 32, 3835-59.
10. Lee, S. H.; Lee, C.; Ro, Y.; et al. Advancing constitutive analysis of the hot deformation behavior of Ti–3Al–8V–6Cr–4Mo–4Zr via physics-aided machine learning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 39, 5487-98.
11. Chen, X.; Nie, L.; Hu, H.; et al. Investigation on the fracture mechanism and constitutive relations of a typical Ni-based superalloy. Mater. Today. Commun. 2023, 35, 105612.
12. Jarugula, R.; Aravind, U.; Meena, B. S.; Ganesh Sundara Raman, S. High temperature deformation behavior and constitutive modeling for flow behavior of alloy 718. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2020, 29, 4692-707.
13. Chen, X.; Nie, L.; Hu, H.; et al. High-temperature deformation characteristics and constitutive models of Inconel 625 superalloy. Mater. Today. Commun. 2022, 32, 103855.
14. Xie, G.; Yu, X.; Gao, Z.; Xue, W.; Zheng, L. The modified Johnson-Cook strain-stress constitutive model according to the deformation behaviors of a Ni-W-Co-C alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 1020-7.
15. Yao, Z.; Qiao, J.; Pelletier, J.; Yao, Y. Effect of Zener-Hollomon parameter on the flow behavior of Zr-based metallic glass. J. Alloys. Compd. 2020, 819, 152987.
16. Zhang, L.; Zhao, K.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J. Hot deformation behavior investigation of heat-resistant aluminum matrix composite based on Arrhenius model and machine learning. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 33.
17. Lin, Y.; Chen, X. A critical review of experimental results and constitutive descriptions for metals and alloys in hot working. Mater. Design. 2011, 32, 1733-59.
18. Wang, L.; Fang, G.; Leeflang, M.; Duszczyk, J.; Zhou, J. Constitutive behavior and microstructure evolution of the as-extruded AE21 magnesium alloy during hot compression testing. J. Alloys. Compd. 2015, 622, 121-9.
19. An, Y.; Zhou, K.; Wei, S.; et al. High throughput construction for the deformation mechanism diagram and dynamic recrystallization of a bimodal‐sized particle‐reinforced Ti‐2.5Zr‐2Al‐1(Si,C) titanium alloy. MGE. Advances. 2023, 1, e3.
20. Li, S.; Hao, P.; Xu, S.; Yang, L.; Fan, Q. Optimization of Johnson-Cook constitutive parameters of titanium alloy based on a machine learning-accelerated genetic algorithm. Mater. Today. Commun. 2025, 49, 114061.
21. Xu, S.; Yuan, L.; Shan, D. An artificial neural network constitutive model to predict high temperature flow behaviour in 18Ni(250) maraging steel. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 37, 157-72.
22. Xiao, Y.; Deng, Y.; An, Y.; Yuan, L.; Zhan, X.; Wang, B. Strain rate affects the deformation mechanism of a Ti-55511 titanium alloy: modeling of constitutive model and 3D processing map using machine learning. Mater. Today. Commun. 2024, 40, 109881.
23. Tian, H.; Hu, Y.; Ding, Z.; He, J.; Xiong, J. Dynamic physics‐guided neural network for predicting hot deformation behavior of TiAl‐based intermetallic alloys. MGE. Advances. 2025, 3, e70033.
24. Shu, C.; Yao, Z.; Wang, S.; et al. Transferable hot‐deformation flow‐curve modeling across steels through transfer learning. MGE. Advances. 2026, 4, e70082.
25. Pei, Y.; Li, L.; Yu, M.; Wei, E.; Zhao, M.; Teng, B. Comparison and evaluation of different constitutive models for predicting the hot deformation behavior of Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy. J. Magnes. Alloys. 2025, 13, 2084-102.
26. Dewangan, S. K.; Jain, R.; Bhattacharjee, S.; et al. Enhancing flow stress predictions in CoCrFeNiV high entropy alloy with conventional and machine learning techniques. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 30, 2377-87.
27. Sani, S. A.; Ebrahimi, G.; Vafaeenezhad, H.; Kiani-Rashid, A. Modeling of hot deformation behavior and prediction of flow stress in a magnesium alloy using constitutive equation and artificial neural network (ANN) model. J. Magnes. Alloys. 2018, 6, 134-44.
28. Taç, V.; Linka, K.; Sahli-Costabal, F.; Kuhl, E.; Tepole, A. B. Benchmarking physics-informed frameworks for data-driven hyperelasticity. Comput. Mech. 2024, 73, 49-65.
29. Thosar, D.; Bhakte, A.; Li, Z.; Srinivasan, R.; Prasad, V. A novel hybrid neural network for modeling dynamic systems using physics-informed regularization. J. Process. Control. 2025, 152, 103473.
30. Pantalé, O.; Tize Mha, P.; Tongne, A. Efficient implementation of non-linear flow law using neural network into the Abaqus Explicit FEM code. Finite. Elem. Anal. Des. 2022, 198, 103647.
31. Rokni, M.; Zarei-Hanzaki, A.; Roostaei, A. A.; Abolhasani, A. Constitutive base analysis of a 7075 aluminum alloy during hot compression testing. Mater. Design. 2011, 32, 4955-60.
32. Warchomicka, F.; Stockinger, M.; Degischer, H. Quantitative analysis of the microstructure of near β titanium alloy during compression tests. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2006, 177, 473-7.
33. Wang, D.; Chen, X.; Li, Q.; Zhu, H.; He, H. Hot compression behavior, simulation verification and dynamic recrystallization mechanism of Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 31, 3712-25.
34. Ding, S.; Gao, S.; Jiang, X.; Shi, S.; Liang, Y. Comparative study on constitutive models of a near β titanium alloy TC18 during thermoplastic deformation based on machine learning. Mater. Today. Commun. 2025, 42, 111230.
35. Liu, L.; Lian, L.; Li, X.; Jiaqi, W.; Hu, W.; Liu, Y. Intelligent optimized design of novel high‐temperature titanium alloys. MGE. Advances. 2025, 3, e70006.
