fig3

Transfer learning-based prediction of high-temperature fatigue life in Fe-based structural alloys with limited data

Figure 3. Performance comparison of ML models using the complete dataset, with error bars representing the standard deviation. (A) Radar chart for the performance comparison; (B) The relationship between the experimental values and the predicted values for the GBDT model, along with the corresponding residual plot (including the mean results from 50 runs with different random seeds). Test set sample size (N) = 60. Error bars represent the standard deviation of 50 independent replicates. ML: Machine learning; GBDT: gradient boosting decision tree; XGBoost: extreme gradient boosting; CatBoost: categorical boosting; RF: random forest; R2: the coefficient of determination; RMSE: root mean square error; MAE: mean absolute error; PCC: Pearson correlation coefficient; logNf: target life.

Journal of Materials Informatics
ISSN 2770-372X (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/