REFERENCES
1. Song, L.; Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Wei, X. Predicting stacking fault energy in austenitic stainless steels via physical metallurgy-based machine learning approaches. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 2.
2. Su, G.; Xie, D.; Wu, F.; et al. Corrosion mechanisms of 316L stainless steel in polyphosphoric acid at elevated temperature: behavior and mechanistic insights. Corros. Sci. 2024, 236, 112277.
3. Ge, W.; Cao, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, C.; Wen, X. Multi-feature driven carbon emission time series coupling model for laser welding system. J. Manuf. Syst. 2022, 65, 767-84.
4. You, D.; Li, Y.; Li, F.; et al. Effect of laser shock peening on the fatigue performance of Q355D steel butt-welded joints. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2025, 9, 273.
5. Wei, H.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, L.; Zhong, Z. Energy efficiency evaluation of hot-wire laser welding based on process characteristic and power consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 255-62.
6. Le-Quang, T.; Faivre, N.; Vakili-Farahani, F.; Wasmer, K. Energy-efficient laser welding with beam oscillating technique - a parametric study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 313, 127796.
7. Yilbas, B. S.; Shaukat, M. M.; Afzal, A. A.; Ashraf, F. Life cycle analysis for laser welding of alloys. Opt. Laser. Technol. 2020, 126, 106064.
8. Jiang, P.; Wang, C.; Zhou, Q.; Shao, X.; Shu, L.; Li, X. Optimization of laser welding process parameters of stainless steel 316L using FEM, Kriging and NSGA-II. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2016, 99, 147-60.
9. Yang, Y.; Cao, L.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, C.; Wu, Q.; Jiang, P. Multi-objective process parameters optimization of laser-magnetic hybrid welding combining Kriging and NSGA-II. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2018, 49, 253-62.
10. IEA. CO2 Emissions in 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022. (accessed 23 Jan 2026).
11. Ghari, H.; Taherizadeh, A.; Sadeghian, B.; Sadeghi, B.; Cavaliere, P. Metallurgical characteristics of aluminum-steel joints manufactured by rotary friction welding: a review and statistical analysis. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2024, 30, 2520-50.
12. Winiczenko, R.; Skibicki, A.; Skoczylas, P. Multi-objective optimisation of welding parameters for AZ91D/AA6082 rotary friction welded joints. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1477.
13. Kahhal, P.; Ghasemi, M.; Kashfi, M.; Ghorbani-Menghari, H.; Kim, J. H. A multi-objective optimization using response surface model coupled with particle swarm algorithm on FSW process parameters. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2837.
14. Li, C.; Tang, Y.; Cui, L.; Li, P. A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. J. Intell. Manuf. 2015, 26, 911-22.
15. Peng, G.; Ma, L.; Hong, S.; Ji, G.; Chang, H. Optimization design and internal flow characteristics analysis based on latin hypercube sampling method. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2025, 50, 2715-54.
16. Mou, X.; Huang, X.; Ma, G.; et al. Prediction of Storage quality and multi-objective optimization of storage conditions for fresh Lycium barbarum L. based on optimized latin hypercube sampling. Foods 2025, 14, 2807.
17. Park, J.; Ryu, I.; Ryu, D.; Lee, Y. An efficient near-optimal Latin hypercube design for large datasets. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2025, 39, 315-28.
18. Ma, J.; Xia, D.; Guo, H.; et al. Metaheuristic-based support vector regression for landslide displacement prediction: a comparative study. Landslides 2022, 19, 2489-511.
19. Imani, M.; Beikmohammadi, A.; Arabnia, H. R. Comprehensive analysis of random forest and XGBoost performance with SMOTE, ADASYN, and GNUS under varying imbalance levels. Technologies 2025, 13, 88.
20. Niazkar, M.; Menapace, A.; Brentan, B.; et al. Applications of XGBoost in water resources engineering: a systematic literature review (Dec 2018 - May 2023). Environ. Model. Softw. 2024, 174, 105971.
21. Li, X.; Shi, L.; Shi, Y.; et al. Exploring interactive and nonlinear effects of key factors on intercity travel mode choice using XGBoost. Appl. Geogr. 2024, 166, 103264.
22. Erdogan Erten, G.; Yavuz, M.; Deutsch, C. V. Combination of machine learning and Kriging for spatial estimation of geological attributes. Nat. Resour. Res. 2022, 31, 191-213.
23. Takoutsing, B.; Heuvelink, G. B. Comparing the prediction performance, uncertainty quantification and extrapolation potential of regression Kriging and random forest while accounting for soil measurement errors. Geoderma 2022, 428, 116192.
24. Bahrami, B.; Khayyambashi, M. R.; Mirjalili, S. Multiobjective placement of edge servers in MEC environment using a hybrid algorithm based on NSGA-II and MOPSO. IEEE. Internet. Things. J. 2024, 11, 29819-37.
25. Nagayo, A. M.; Singh, R.; Dhawan, A.; et al. Integrating environmental sustainability in construction time-cost trade-off for decision-making using hybrid NSGA-III and MOPSO approach. Asian. J. Civ. Eng. 2025, 26, 1527-42.
26. Agarwal, A. K.; Chauhan, S. S.; Sharma, K.; Sethi, K. C. Development of time–cost trade-off optimization model for construction projects with MOPSO technique. Asian. J. Civ. Eng. 2024, 25, 4529-39.
27. Chowdhury, S.; Bohre, A. K.; Saha, A. K. Meta-Heuristic optimization for hybrid renewable energy system in Durgapur: performance comparison of GWO, TLBO, and MOPSO. Sustainability 2025, 17, 6954.
28. Kim, H. Y. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing means of more than two groups. Restor. Dent. Endod. 2014, 39, 74-7.
29. Chen, W.; Carrera Uribe, M.; Kwon, E. E.; et al. A comprehensive review of thermoelectric generation optimization by statistical approach: Taguchi method, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and response surface methodology (RSM). Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2022, 169, 112917.
30. Guo, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, B.; Yao, Q. A variable and mode sensitivity analysis method for structural system using a novel active learning Kriging model. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 206, 107285.
31. Xiao, N.; Yuan, K.; Zhou, C. Adaptive Kriging-based efficient reliability method for structural systems with multiple failure modes and mixed variables. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2020, 359, 112649.
32. Vimbi, V.; Shaffi, N.; Mahmud, M. Interpreting artificial intelligence models: a systematic review on the application of LIME and SHAP in Alzheimer’s disease detection. Brain. Inform. 2024, 11, 10.
