fig2

Impact of autologous blood transfusions on surface marker and microRNA profiles of urinary extracellular vesicles

Figure 2. Characterization of uEVs separated by immunoaffinity. (A) TEM images of two representative samples illustrate desiccated vesicles (wide field: scale bar 250 nm; close-up: scale bar 100 nm). The omnipresent black dots indicate magnetic beads carried over from immunoaffinity-based enrichment. Brightness was adjusted for each other for better visibility using IrfanView software; (B) Western blot analysis of uEV-enriched eluates originating from one representative individual with different urinary dilutions, as indicated by the corresponding creatinine levels (UCrea). Images were cropped to the corresponding protein marker size range for a better overview. Baseline summarizes -9 w, -8 w, -7 w; (C) Fluorescence NTA (n = 3 of Group 2 with eight to 11 technical replicates each; baseline includes -9 w, -8 w, -7 w; mean ± SD; *one-way ANOVA: adjust P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001 vs. baseline, adjusted ##P < 0.01, ####P < 0.0001 vs. t = 0) indicating particle concentration, normalized to input volumes and urinary creatinine levels (UCrea); and (D) hydrodynamic particle diameters; mean ± SD. ANOVA: Analysis of variance; uEV: urinary extracellular vesicle; TEM: transmission electron microscopy; UCrea: urinary creatinine; NTA: nanoparticle tracking analysis; SD: standard deviation; EPCAM: epithelial cell adhesion molecules; w: weeks.

Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids
ISSN 2767-6641 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/