fig1

Comparison of extracellular vesicle isolation methods reveals method-dependent protein and miRNA profiles in saliva

Figure 1. Schematic overview of the experimental workflow for salivary EV isolation and analysis. Unstimulated saliva (4 mL) was collected from healthy donors and sequentially centrifuged at 300 × g and 3,000 × g to remove cells, large debris, and residual contaminants. The resulting WS was divided into four aliquots: 0.5 mL was retained as the WS control, and 1 mL was allocated to each of the three EV isolation methods: UC, Q, and M. The isolated EVs were subsequently characterized and subjected to proteomic and small RNA sequencing analyses. EV: Extracellular vesicles; WS: whole saliva supernatant; UC: ultracentrifugation; Q: PEG-based co-precipitation; M: immunoaffinity capture; PBS: phosphate-buffered saline; RT: room temperature; NTA: nanoparticle tracking analysis; NGS: next-generation sequencing; EM: electron microscopy; Cryo-EM: cryogenic electron microscopy; μBCA: micro bicinchoninic acid assay.

Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids
ISSN 2767-6641 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/