Download PDF
Article  |  Open Access  |  24 Jun 2025

LixVSy nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Views: 63 |  Downloads: 4 |  Cited:  0
Energy Mater. 2025, 5, 500126.
10.20517/energymater.2025.44 |  © The Author(s) 2025.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Abstract

All-solid-state (ASS) lithium-sulfur batteries are promising power sources with the potential for high capacity and safety. Lithium metal polysulfide cathodes can address issues arising from the low electronic conductivity of Li2S and S. This study synthesized lithium vanadium polysulfides (LixVSy) by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S and V2S3. The LixVSy system contains nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in an amorphous matrix; lithiation and delithiation occur in both Li2S and LiVS2 during charging and discharging. LiVS2 enhances the electronic conductivity of LixVSy (~10-1-10-2 S cm-1) and the reversibility of charge-discharge reactions because of its high electronic conductivity and layered structure. Therefore, ASS batteries with LixVSy show high capacity (~650 mAh g-1), even without conductive additives. Here, ASS full cells with high loading assembled using a composite cathode comprising Li8VS5.5 and a solid electrolyte in a 80:20 (wt.%) ratio (33 mg cm-2) and a composite Si anode (10.4 mg cm-2) exhibited a high areal capacity of 15 mAh cm-2, resulting in calculation of high energy densities of 853 Wh L-1 and 515 Wh kg-1 when assuming the cells were enlarged and stacked. This study is expected to expedite research on the development of high-performance ASS batteries.

Keywords

Lithium-vanadium polysulfide cathodes, all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries, sulfide solid electrolytes, high energy density, nanocomposites

INTRODUCTION

Lithium-sulfur batteries have attracted considerable attention as promising next-generation batteries owing to their high capacity and low cost[1,2]. All-solid-state (ASS) lithium-sulfur batteries containing sulfide solid electrolytes (SEs) are particularly promising for practical use because of several reasons. First, there is no risk of polysulfide dissolution in such systems; in contrast, conventional lithium batteries with organic liquid electrolytes undergo capacity degradation due to the formation and dissolution of polysulfides in the electrolyte[3,4]. Second, compared with systems containing oxide-based cathodes, such as LiCoO2 and LiNixMnyCozO2, facile solid-solid interface formation is observed in lithium-sulfur batteries containing sulfide SEs, resulting in sufficient contact between the cathode and sulfide SE through pressing[5,6]. Third, sulfide SEs exhibiting high ionic conductivities of ~10-2-10-3 S cm-1 have been developed[7-10]. However, because of the low electronic conductivities of Li2S and S, sulfur-based cathodes typically require 10-20 wt.% of composite cathodes[11]. In addition, carbon additives degrade the cycle performance of sulfide ASS batteries (ASSBs) by promoting the electrochemical decomposition of sulfide SEs[12-15]. Therefore, cathodes with high electronic conductivities should be developed to fabricate ASSBs that exhibit a long cycle life, even without carbon additives.

Some metal polysulfides and composite electrodes do not require carbon because of their high electronic conductivity[16-18]. In addition, Li-containing metal polysulfide cathodes can employ various anodes, such as Si and Si-based alloys, besides lithium metal. Li3NbS4[18] and Li3CuS2[19] show electronic conductivities of 2 × 10-3 and 9.5 × 10-3 S cm-1, respectively, and ASSBs containing these electrodes show reversible capacities of 386 and 380 mAh g-1, respectively, without any conductive additives. Our group has focused on lithium vanadium polysulfides, LixVSy[20], because vanadium sulfides show higher electronic conductivity[21-25]. Our previous publication reports that LixVSy (x = 5-9, y = 4-6) shows a high electronic conductivity of ~10-1-10-2 S cm-1[20]. Moreover, an ASSB with a composite electrode containing Li5VS4 and the SE in an 80:20 ratio (wt.%) shows 94% of the theoretical capacity (626 mAh g-1) without any conductive additives[20]. Recently, some lithium-containing vanadium sulfides, such as 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24] and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2[25], have been reported as high-capacity cathodes. 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI systems comprise LiVS2 and Li2S-LiI nanoparticles dispersed in an Li2S-V2S3-LiI amorphous matrix, resulting in electrode-electrolyte bifunctional features[24]. In contrast, core-shell Li2S/LiVS2 systems comprise a Li2S core and a LiVS2 shell, and LixVS2 functions as an interfacial redox mediator in such systems[25]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements indicate that LixVSy is composed of Li2S and LiVS2[20]. However, the underlying reason for the high capacity of such systems, based on the detailed structure of LixVSy, has not been systematically investigated to date.

In this study, the detailed structural analysis of LixVSy, including its charged and discharged states, was conducted using synchrotron XRD measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements to understand the reaction mechanism of systems comprising LixVSy. High-loading full cells comprising Li8VS5.5 and Si without any conductive additives showed a high areal capacity of 15 mAh cm-2. According to the calculation, a high energy density exceeding 800 Wh L-1 and 500 Wh kg-1 will be achieved on enlargement and stacking of the full cells.

EXPERIMENTAL

Preparation of LixVSy cathodes

LixVSy (x = 5-9, y = 4-6) cathodes were prepared by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S (99%, Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co. Ltd.) and V2S3 (99%; Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co. Ltd.) according to a previously described method[20]. A high-crystallinity sample of Li8VS5.5 (denoted as Li8VS5.5-HC) was synthesized under modified processing conditions. Stoichiometric mixtures of Li2S and V2S3 were weighed - 6 g for Li8VS5.5-HC and 1 g for standard Li8VS5.5 - and placed into ZrO2 milling pots (250 mL for Li8VS5.5-HC and 45 mL for Li8VS5.5) each loaded with ZrO2 balls (30 balls of 15 mm diameter for Li8VS5.5-HC and 15 balls of 10 mm diameter for Li8VS5.5). All procedures were conducted under a dry Ar atmosphere. Mechanical milling was performed using planetary ball mills: a Pulverisette 5 classic line (Fritsch) for Li8VS5.5-HC and a Pulverisette 7 premium line (Fritsch) for Li8VS5.5. Both mixtures were milled for 160 h at rotational speeds of 300 rpm for Li8VS5.5-HC and 400 rpm for Li8VS5.5.

Construction of ASSBs

Composite cathodes were prepared by gently mixing LixVSy and argyrodite-type sulfide SEs (Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.) for 1 h using a planetary ball mill (Pulverisette 7 premium line, Fritsch). To assemble ASS half-cells with a diameter of 10 mm, the sulfide SE was pressed at 30 MPa to fabricate an SE layer, and the composite cathode (10 mg) was placed on the SE layer and pressed at 720 MPa; subsequently, the Li-In alloy was attached to the other side of the SE layer. The resultant cell was sandwiched between two stainless steel (SUS) rods used as current collectors and confined at 160 MPa. Each 1-centimeter square ASS full cell was constructed using a Li8VS5.5 composite cathode and a composite Si anode; the loading mass of the positive and anode layers was 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2, respectively. The fabricated cells were charged and discharged using a charge-discharge measuring device (TOSCAT-3100, Toyo System Co. Ltd.).

Electronic and ionic conductivity measurements

This study measured the electronic and ionic conductivity of composite cathodes by direct current (DC) polarization tests at 25, 45, and 60 °C. SUS/composite cathode/SUS and SUS/Li-In/SE/composite cathode/SE/Li-In/SUS systems were used for electronic and ionic conductivity measurements, respectively. The loading mass of the composite cathode layer in each system was > 30 mg cm-2.

Synchrotron XRD measurements

Synchrotron XRD was used to analyze pristine LixVSy and composite cathodes in charge and discharge states at the BL19B2 beamline of SPring-8 at room temperature. The samples were sealed in glass capillaries (~0.3 mm diameter) under dry Ar. The wavelength of the synchrotron X-ray was 0.5002 Å calibrated by CeO2. The RIETAN-FP program was used for Rietveld refinement[26], and multiphases were added one by one while peak identification was carefully performed to sufficiently reduce residual peaks.

Elemental analysis of LixVSy

To investigate the amounts of Li and V in LixVSy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) was conducted using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Agilent 5110 VDV, Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Before measurements, the samples were thermally decomposed using acids, and their final volume was adjusted using ultrapure water. The amount of S in the samples was measured using an automatic combustion halogen and sulfur analysis system (HSU-35/SQ-10, Anatec Yanaco Co. Ltd. and ICS-2100, Dionex Corp.).

XAFS measurements

The valence states and local structures of the S and V atoms in LixVSy and composite cathodes after charge and discharge tests were examined by S and V K-edge XAFS measurements at the Synchrotron Radiation Center, Ritsumeikan University. The S and V K-edge spectra of the samples were recorded at the BL-10 and BL-3 beamlines, respectively[27]. The incident X-ray beam was monochromatized with a Ge(111) crystal (2d = 6.532 Å) for S K-edge measurements by the total electron yield method. The photon energy was calibrated with the strong resonance of K2SO4 (S 1s → t2) at 2481.7 eV[28]. For V K-edge measurements in the conventional transmission mode, the incident X-ray beam was monochromatized with a Si(220) crystal (2d = 3.840 Å). All samples for S and Fe K-edge measurements were sealed in Ar-filled transfer vessels[27] and Al-laminated bags, respectively.

TEM observations

The LixVSy samples were analyzed by a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (Talos F200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Bright-field TEM micrographs were acquired by a slow-scan charge-coupled device camera (Ceta, FEI Company) at 200 kV of accelerated voltage with 0.5 s exposure time.

Additionally, the composite cathodes before charging and after the second discharging process were analyzed using cryo-scanning TEM (cryo-STEM) on an atomic-resolution analytical electron microscope (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL Ltd.). Before STEM analysis, the samples were thinned to the desired shape using a focused ion beam milling apparatus (NanoDUE’ T NB5000, Hitachi High-Tech Corp.). To investigate the elemental mappings in the samples, STEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) and STEM-electron energy loss spectroscopy (STEM-EELS) were conducted with EDX (JED-2300T, JEOL Ltd.) and EELS (GIF Quantum-ER, Gatan, Inc.) instruments.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Characterization of LixVSy cathodes

Cathode materials with compositions Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, Li8VS5.5, and Li9VS6 were synthesized via ball milling of Li2S and V2S3. As reported in our previous study[20], the theoretical capacity of LixVSy compounds increases with higher Li and S content (increasing x and y), whereas the electronic conductivity correspondingly decreases. The initial charge-discharge profiles of half-cells incorporating LixVSy (x = 5-9, y = 4-6) cathodes were also investigated in that study[20]. Among the compositions evaluated, Li8VS5.5 exhibited the highest initial discharge capacity, making it the most promising candidate. Therefore, Li8VS5.5 was selected for further investigation in the present study. Figure 1A and Supplementary Table 1 show the synchrotron XRD patterns and crystallographic data, respectively, of Li8VS5.5. The results of the other LixVSy samples are shown in Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1. The synchrotron XRD patterns of all samples contain diffraction peaks corresponding to Li2S (space group: Fm$$\overline{3}$$m) and LiVS2 (space group: P$$\overline{3}$$m1), indicating the formation of LiVS2 by the reaction of Li2S and V2S3. The molar ratio of all samples from Li2S to LiVS2 was calculated from their synchrotron XRD patterns [Supplementary Table 1]. Except for Li5VS4, the molar and nominal ratios of all samples are similar. The spectrum of Li5VS4 contains diffraction peaks corresponding to V2O3; notably, the starting material V2S3 contains V2O3 as an impurity. Li5VS4, which requires the highest amount of V2S3 among all the LixVSy samples, contained the highest amount of V2O3. For Li5VS4, the addition of vanadium atoms from V2O3 to the mol% of LiVS2 results in Li2S/LiVS2 (V2O3) = 69.1/30.5, which is approximately the same as the nominal ratio of the system. The amounts of Li, V, and S in LixVSy were determined using ICP-AES and an automatic combustion halogen and sulfur analysis system [Supplementary Table 2]. The measurement data for all samples were consistent with their nominal ratios, indicating that S volatilization did not occur during synthesis by ball milling.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 1. (A) Rietveld analysis of the synchrotron XRD pattern of Li8VS5.5 with Rwp = 3.13%, Re = 1.64%, and S = 1.91. (B) S K-edge and (C) V K-edge XANES spectra of Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, Li8VS5.5, and Li9VS6 with reference spectra of Li2S, LiVS2, and V2S3. The V K-edge XANES spectrum of Li9VS6 is not shown because of its low S/N ratio.

Figure 1B and C show the S and V K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of the LixVSy samples. The V K-edge spectrum of Li9VS6 is not shown in Figure 1C because of its low S/N ratio. In the S K-edge spectra, the peak intensities of Li2S and LiVS2 increase and decrease, respectively, with increasing x in LixVSy, consistent with the results of synchrotron XRD. Moreover, the V K-edge spectra indicate that the electronic states of V in all the samples are almost the same as those in LiVS2.

TEM was used to investigate the microstructures of Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, and Li8VS5.5 [Supplementary Figure 2]. The results indicate that most samples are in an amorphous state. In the TEM image of Li8VS5.5, LiVS2 and Li2S are mapped in red and green at each lattice spacing [Figure 2A]. The TEM image of Li8VS5.5 shows nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 distributed in Li8VS5.5. LixVSy cathodes show high electronic conductivity (~10-1-10-2 S cm-1) because they comprise highly composited LiVS2 with high electronic conductivity and insulating Li2S. To compare the mixed states of Li2S and LiVS2, a Li8VS5.5 sample with high crystallinity (labeled Li8VS5.5-HC) was synthesized under different ball-milling conditions with relatively low mechanical energy. The TEM image of Li8VS5.5-HC [Figure 2B] indicates a higher crystallinity of Li2S and LiVS2 than that in Li8VS5.5. A comparison of Figure 2A and B indicates that Li2S and LiVS2 with a large crystallite size exist in Li8VS5.5-HC; in contrast, Li2S and LiVS2 with a smaller crystallite size are highly mixed in Li8VS5.5. Moreover, Li8VS5.5-HC exhibits a higher electronic conductivity (0.19 S cm-1) than Li8VS5.5 (0.059 S cm-1), possibly because Li8VS5.5-HC contains high-crystallinity LiVS2 with high electronic conductivity. Figure 2C shows the initial charge-discharge curves of ASSBs containing Li8VS5.5 samples. Cells with Li8VS5.5-HC show large hysteresis and low capacity. Moreover, the mixture of Li2S and LiVS2 prepared by hand mixing did not operate in ASSBs. A comparison of Li8VS5.5 samples suggests that high electronic conductivity and a well-dispersed nanocomposite structure comprising Li2S, which contributes to high capacity, and LiVS2, which provides high electronic conductivity, is essential for optimal performance. As demonstrated in our previous study[20], Li8VS5.5 exhibited the highest initial charge capacity among the LixVSy series (x = 5-9, y = 4-6), indicating that its specific molar ratio of Li2S to LiVS2 is particularly favorable. Additionally, the presence of amorphous regions within the LixVSy matrix is believed to facilitate efficient pathways for both electronic and ionic transport[24].

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 2. High-resolution TEM images of (A) Li8VS5.5 and (B) Li8VS5.5-HC (high crystallinity) with LiVS2 and Li2S mapped in red and green, respectively. The color mapping is defined by a difference in lattice spacing. (C) Initial charge-discharge curves of ASSBs containing Li8VS5.5 and Li8VS5.5-HC under a current density of 0.13 mA cm-2 at 25 °C.

Electrochemical properties of Li8VS5.5 cathodes

To determine an optimal composition for electrode fabrication, composite cathodes were prepared by mixing Li8VS5.5 with a sulfide SE at various weight ratios (70/30, 75/25, 80/20, and 85/15). The electronic and ionic conductivities and electrochemical capacities of these composites were systematically analyzed and compared. In our previous study[20], the electronic and ionic conductivities of pure Li8VS5.5 were reported to be 5.9 × 10-2 and 5.6 × 10-6 S cm-2 at room temperature, respectively.

Figure 3A shows the electronic conductivities of the fabricated composite cathodes measured by DC polarization at 25 °C. The electronic conductivity is enhanced by increasing the weight ratio of Li8VS5.5. The electronic conductivity of electrodes containing 70 wt.% of Li8VS5.5 is higher than the ionic conductivity of the SE (ca. 2 × 10-3 S cm-1); therefore, the Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes exhibit sufficient electronic conductivity. The ionic conductivity values for each composite electrode measured by DC polarization at 25, 45, and 60 °C are shown in Figure 3B. The ionic conductivities of the composite electrodes decrease with increasing content of Li8VS5.5. Notably, the ionic conductivities of the composite electrodes are lower than their electronic conductivities, even at 60 °C, indicating that ionic conduction is a rate-limiting process in the composite electrodes.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 3. (A) Electronic and (B) ionic conductivities of composite cathodes comprising Li8VS5.5 and the SE in weight ratios of 70/30, 75/25, 80/20, and 85/15. The electronic conductivities are measured at 25 °C, and the ionic conductivities are measured at 25, 45, and 60 °C. (C) Discharge capacities per composite cathode for ASS cells with different weight ratios of Li8VS5.5 and the SE and the same amount of Li8VS5.5. (D) Charge-discharge curves of ASS full cells containing Li8VS5.5 and Si electrodes. The mass loadings of the positive and anodes are 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2, respectively. The cell is charged and discharged with a constant current and voltage at a rate of 0.01 C (until a rate of 0.001 C) over cut-off voltages of 1.22-3.62 V at 60 °C.

Figure 3C shows the discharge capacities of cells containing composite cathodes with various weight ratios of Li8VS5.5 and the SE at 60 °C. Each composite cathode was fabricated with the same amount of Li8VS5.5, and the discharge capacities of the fabricated cells were calculated using the amount of composite cathode. The ionic conductivity of the cells decreases with increasing weight ratio of Li8VS5.5. Moreover, the amount of composite cathode increases, and the electronic conductivity decreases with decreasing weight ratio of Li8VS5.5. The cell with a Li8VS5.5 to SE weight ratio of 80/20 shows the highest discharge capacity owing to an optimal balance of ionic and electronic conductivities.

Figure 3D shows the charge-discharge curves of ASS full cell with Li8VS5.5 and Si electrodes. The cathode contains 33 mg cm-2 of the composite cathode consisting of Li8VS5.5 and SE in a weight ratio of 80/20, whereas the anode contains 10.4 mg cm-2 of the Si composite electrode. The size of the full cell is a 1 × 1 centimeter square. Considering a discharge capacity of ca. 15 mAh cm-2 and an average operating voltage of 1.646 V, 20 stacked A4 size (210 mm × 297 mm) ASSBs are expected to show high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities of 853 Wh L-1 and 515 Wh kg-1, respectively, in a calculation. The cycling performance of the ASS full cell is shown in Supplementary Figure 3A. The capacity retention rate decreases to ~80% after the 10th cycle. Because Li8VS5.5 shows large volume changes during the charge-discharge process, the cell with a high mass loading shows capacity degradation owing to the disconnection of conduction paths between the solid and solid interfaces. Supplementary Figure 3B demonstrates that a half-cell containing Li8VS5.5 with a low mass loading of 6.4 mg cm-2 exhibits excellent cycling performance. Supplementary Figure 3C presents the charge-discharge profiles for the first five cycles of the same cell. With increasing cycle numbers, electrode polarization decreased while capacity improved, indicating progressive activation of the electrode. This activation behavior in the initial cycles is consistent with that observed in previously reported ASS lithium-sulfur batteries[29-31].

The volume-change rate of Li8VS5.5 during the charging process was calculated by estimating the molar volumes of Li8VS5.5 and VS5.5 listed in Supplementary Table 3. The molar volume of Li8VS5.5 was calculated from its molar mass and measured density value (2.06 g cm-3). The molar volume of VS5.5 was calculated from the molar ratio, molar mass, and density values of S and VS2. After charging, Li8VS5.5 shows a lower shrinking rate (36.5%) than Li2S (42.1%). Moreover, compared with Li2S, Li8VS5.5 shows a better electronic conductivity and volume change rate. To improve the cycle performance of ASSBs containing Li8VS5.5, the volume changes of Li8VS5.5 during charge-discharge tests should be investigated by operando measurements. Several approaches have been proposed for reducing crack formation in cells, such as selecting anodes with large volume changes to adjust the total volume change of cells. Details regarding the volume changes of Li8VS5.5 will be discussed in our next paper.

Reaction mechanism of Li8VS5.5 cathodes

Li8VS5.5 enables the construction of high-energy-density ASSBs. To investigate the structural changes during charging and discharging, synchrotron XRD measurements were conducted on composite Li8VS5.5 cathodes before and after charge and discharge [Figure 4]. For the XRD measurements, the ASSBs with a Li8VS5.5 to SE weight ratio of 85/15 were fabricated to detect structural changes of Li8VS5.5 clearly by increasing amount of Li8VS5.5 in composite cathodes. The XRD patterns of Li8VS5.5 and the SE are shown in Figure 4. The XRD pattern before charging [Figure 4A] contains diffraction peaks attributable to Li2S, LiVS2, and the SE, whereas that after charging [Figure 4B] mainly contains diffraction peaks attributable to the SE, possibly owing to the formation of amorphous S by the delithiation of Li2S. In addition, the diffraction peaks attributed to LiVS2 are shifted to higher angles because of delithiation from LiVS2. Moreover, the XRD pattern after charging indicates the partial decomposition of the SE to LiCl. The XRD pattern recorded after the discharging process [Figure 4C] contains diffraction peaks attributed to Li2S resulting from lithiation to S. Furthermore, the diffraction peaks corresponding to LiVS2 shift to lower angles after discharge, suggesting lithiation to form VS2. Notably, elemental S and LiCl remain in the composite cathodes post-discharge. Modifications such as O-doping have been proposed as effective strategies to mitigate the decomposition of the SE[32]. Table 1 shows the crystallographic data of LiVS2 in the Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes and reference data for LiVS2 and VS2[33]. The a and c axes shrink after charging, corresponding to structural changes from LiVS2 to VS2. After discharging, the a and c axes change to their pristine states, indicating the reversible formation of LiVS2.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 4. Rietveld analysis of the synchrotron XRD patterns of Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes (A) before charging, (B) after charging, and (C) after discharging.

Table 1

Crystallographic data of LiVS2 in Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes (a) before charging, (b) after charging, and (c) after discharging, and reference data of LiVS2 and VS2

(a) Before charge (b) After charge (c) After discharge LiVS2[33] VS2[33]
a 3.374(2) 3.233(5) 3.393(4) 3.381 3.218
c 6.064(3) 5.847(9) 6.055(7) 6.139 5.755

Figure 5 shows the S K-edge spectra of the composite cathodes after the first and third charge and discharge. The spectra of the samples after the first charge and discharge are similar to the patterns after the third charge and discharge, respectively, suggesting that the structure changes reversibly over a few cycles.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 5. S K-edge XANES spectra of Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes before and after the first and third charge and discharge tests.

The XRD patterns and XANES spectra before and after charge-discharge tests indicate reversible delithiation and lithiation. Cryo-STEM measurements were conducted on the Li8VS5.5 composite cathode to investigate nanoscale structural changes after the second discharge test. Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure 4 show the bright-field STEM (BF-STEM) and high-angle annular dark-field STEM (HAADF-STEM) images of the composite electrodes. A red square highlights the EDX measurement area. Figures 6B-G show the annular dark field STEM (ADF-STEM) images and count mappings of the P, Cl, V, S, and O K-edges of the measurement area. In the mapping results of P, Cl, and V, the bright contrast areas highlighted by yellow circles in the ADF-STEM image and the other areas indicate the SE and Li8VS5.5, respectively. Figure 7A-D shows the STEM-EELS mapping results of the measurement area; the yellow circles and other areas in the HAADF-STEM image indicate SE and Li8VS5.5, respectively. The intensity of Li and S in the Li8VS5.5 area decreases toward the interface between Li8VS5.5 and the SE, which is highlighted with orange dotted circles. The thickness of the low-intensity area is ~200 nm. No low-intensity area was observed before the charge-discharge test (not shown here); therefore, the interface was assumed to change during charge-discharge testing. Moreover, Li in the SE area showed low intensity, suggesting that the SE near Li8VS5.5 was delithiated.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 6. (A) BF-STEM images of composite cathodes consisting of Li8VS5.5 and the SE after the second discharge test. The EDX measurement area is highlighted by a red square. (B) ADF-STEM image and EDX mappings of (C) P, (D) Cl, (E) V, (F) S, and (G) O K-edges. Yellow circles indicate the SE areas.

Li<i><sub>x</sub></i>VS<i><sub>y</sub></i> nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

Figure 7. (A) HAADF-STEM images of composite cathodes consisting of Li8VS5.5 and the SE after the second discharge test. Yellow and orange dotted circles indicate the SE area and interface between Li8VS5.5 and the SE, respectively. STEM-EELS mappings of (B) Li, (C) S, and (D) V. (E) Sets of decomposed spectra of components 1-3 and (F-H) their distribution maps.

Figure 7E-H shows decomposed spectra and their distribution mappings, respectively. Component 1 is distributed in the bulk of Li8VS5.5, whereas component 2 is observed at the interface of Li8VS5.5 and the SE. The V L-edge peak of component 2 is shifted to a higher position than that of component 1, indicating an increase in the valence of V. Moreover, the peak intensity of the O K-edge in component 2 is higher than that in component 1. Component 3, which shows a low intensity for the V L-edge and a high intensity for the O K-edge, is distributed mainly in the SE areas. Figure 7 indicates a deficit of Li and S and an increase in the valence of V in the Li8VS5.5 region near the interface of Li8VS5.5 and the SE, suggesting the formation of an interphase between Li8VS5.5 and the SE after a few charge-discharge cycles. In addition, the SE undergoes delithiation and partial decomposition by oxygen. Maintaining a low oxygen content can improve the cycle performance of ASSBs with LixVSy. Moreover, investigating the behavior of the LixVSy-SE interphase is critical for an accurate battery performance analysis.

Comparison with other lithium-containing vanadium sulfide electrodes

A comparison of Li8VS5.5, 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24], and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2[25] is provided in Table 2. Li8VS5.5 contains the highest amount of Li2S, which is an insulator; however, because of the structure of the nanocomposite in the amorphous matrix, high electronic conductivity was obtained. Despite containing a high amount of Li2S, ASSBs with Li8VS5.5 (even those with high loading) show the highest capacity among all the ASSBs with lithium-containing vanadium sulfide materials because nanosized LiVS2 in the amorphous matrix forms sufficient electron conduction paths. Our previous study demonstrated that Li5VS4 and Li6VS4.5 exhibit superior rate performance than Li8VS5.5. In particular, the Li6VS4.5 half-cell delivered a higher areal capacity at a relatively high current density of 1.3 mA cm-2 compared with 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24] and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2[25] [Supplementary Table 4]. These results indicate that tuning the composition of LixVSy is an effective strategy for improving rate performance.

Table 2

Comparison of the properties of Li8VS5.5, 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI, and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2

Active material Li8VS5.5 (this work) 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24] Core shell of Li2S/LiVS2[25]
Structure Nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in amorphous matrix LiVS2 and Li2S-LiI nanoparticles dispersed in the Li2S-V2S3-LiI amorphous matrix Li2S core and LiVS2 shell
Feature Sufficient electron conduction paths formed by nano LiVS2, despite a high content of Li2S Electrode-electrolyte bifunctional material Interfacial redox mediator (LixVS2)
Synthesis Ball milling Ball milling Reacting Li2S with VCl4 in tetrahydrofuran
Electronic conductivity at RT 0.059 S cm-1 > 0.1 S cm-1 5.5 S cm-1
Ionic conductivity at RT 5.6 × 10-6 S cm-1 2.5 × 10-4 S cm-1 1.3 × 10-5 S cm-1
Li2S:LiVS2 77.8:22.2 (wt.%) 50:50 (wt.%) ~60:~40 (wt.%)
Composite cathodes including active material and SE
Active material:SE 80:20 (wt.%) 100:0 (wt.%) 50:50 (wt.%)
Li2S in composite cathodes 62.2 wt.% 45 wt.% ~30 wt.%
Electronic conductivity at RT 1.2 × 10-2 S cm-1 >0.1 S cm-1 5.1 × 10-1 S cm-1
Ionic conductivity at RT 2.0 × 10-5 S cm-1 2.5 × 10-4 S cm-1 1.5 × 10-4 S cm-1
High-loading performance[a] 33 mg cm-2,15 mAh cm-2
(full cell, 60 °C, 0.2 mA cm-2)
ca. 4.5 mg cm-2, ca. 1.7 mAh cm-2
(half-cell, 25 °C, 0.13 mA cm-2)
20 mg cm-2, 5.3 mAh cm-2
(half-cell, 60 °C, 0.25 mA cm-2)

CONCLUSIONS

LixVSy synthesized by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S and V2S3 contains nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in an amorphous matrix and shows high electronic conductivity (10-1-10-2 S cm-1) and capacity (~650 mAh g-1). Delithiation and lithiation proceed in both Li2S and LiVS2 during charge-discharge reactions. Moreover, LiVS2 enhances the electronic conductivity of LixVSy and the reversibility of charge-discharge reactions owing to its high electronic conductivity and layered structure. ASS full cells with a high mass loading of 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2 of a composite cathode comprising 80/20 (wt.%) of Li8VS5.5 and the SE and a composite Si anode, respectively, show a high areal capacity of 15 mAh cm-2. According to the calculation, enlarging such full cells to 210 mm × 297 mm and stacking 20 cells results in high energy densities of 853 Wh L-2 and 515 Wh kg-1. Notably, Li8VS5.5 includes the highest amount of Li2S among the reported lithium-containing vanadium sulfide electrodes. Further studies on the volume changes of LixVSy and the formation of an interphase between LixVSy and the SE during charge-discharge tests could facilitate modifications that improve the cycle performance of ASSBs with LixVSy. The results of this study contribute significantly toward research on ASSBs and are expected to guide future research on the design and development of high-performance ASSBs with high potential applicability in various fields.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and interpretation: Otoyama, M.; Wanibuchi, M.

Performed data acquisition for structural characterization: Takeuchi, T.; Ishida, N.; Taguchi, N.; Kitta, M.

Supervised: Sano, H.; Kawamoto, K.; Kuratani, K.; Sakaebe, H.

All authors revised the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting this work is provided in the Supplementary Materials.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was partially supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) under the SOLiD-EV Project (JPNP18003).

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2025.

Supplementary Materials

REFERENCES

1. Ji, X.; Nazar, L. F. Advances in Li-S batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 9821.

2. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Chung, S. H.; Zu, C.; Su, Y. S. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751-87.

3. Yamin, H.; Gorenshtein, A.; Penciner, J.; Sternberg, Y.; Peled, E. Lithium sulfur battery - oxidation reduction-mechanisms of polysulfides in Thf solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1988, 135, 1045-8.

4. Shim, J.; Striebel, K. A.; Cairns, E. J. The lithium/sulfur rechargeable cell: effects of electrode composition and solvent on cell performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, A1321.

5. Sakuda, A.; Hayashi, A.; Tatsumisago, M. Sulfide solid electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2261.

6. Fujita, Y.; Münch, K.; Asakura, T.; et al. Dynamic volume change of Li2S-based active material and the influence of stacking pressure on capacity in all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 7533-40.

7. Kamaya, N.; Homma, K.; Yamakawa, Y.; et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 682-6.

8. Kato, Y.; Hori, S.; Saito, T.; et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1, 201630.

9. Li, Y.; Song, S.; Kim, H.; et al. A lithium superionic conductor for millimeter-thick battery electrode. Science 2023, 381, 50-3.

10. Boulineau, S.; Courty, M.; Tarascon, J.; Viallet, V. Mechanochemical synthesis of Li-argyrodite Li6PS5X (X = Cl, Br, I) as sulfur-based solid electrolytes for all solid state batteries application. Solid. State. Ion. 2012, 221, 1-5.

11. Yang, X.; Luo, J.; Sun, X. Towards high-performance solid-state Li-S batteries: from fundamental understanding to engineering design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2140-95.

12. Zhang, W.; Leichtweiß, T.; Culver, S. P.; et al. The detrimental effects of carbon additives in Li10GeP2S12-based solid-state batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 35888-96.

13. Strauss, F.; Stepien, D.; Maibach, J.; et al. Influence of electronically conductive additives on the cycling performance of argyrodite-based all-solid-state batteries. RSC. Adv. 2020, 10, 1114-9.

14. Walther, F.; Randau, S.; Schneider, Y.; et al. Influence of carbon additives on the decomposition pathways in cathodes of lithium thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 6123-36.

15. Fang, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. Achieving stable all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries by tuning the cathode-electrolyte interface and ionic/electronic transport within the cathode. Mater. Today. 2023, 64, 52-60.

16. Balach, J.; Linnemann, J.; Jaumann, T.; Giebeler, L. Metal-based nanostructured materials for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 6, 23127-68.

17. Li, X.; Sun, X.; Xiao, B.; Wang, D.; Liang, J. Inorganic polysulfide chemistries for better energy storage systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 3547-57.

18. Sakuda, A. Metal polysulfides as high capacity electrode active materials - toward superior secondary batteries based on sulfur chemistry. Electrochemistry 2023, 91, 102003.

19. Kawasaki, Y.; Tsukasaki, H.; Ayama, T.; et al. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of Li3CuS2 as a positive electrode material for all-solid-state batteries. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2021, 4, 20-4.

20. Otoyama, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Taguchi, N.; Kuratani, K.; Sakaebe, H. Mechanochemical synthesis and electrochemical properties of LixVSy positive electrodes for all-solid-state batteries. ECS. Adv. 2023, 2, 010501.

21. Ji, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Metallic vanadium disulfide nanosheets as a platform material for multifunctional electrode applications. Nano. Lett. 2017, 17, 4908-16.

22. Cai, L.; Zhang, Q.; Mwizerwa, J. P.; et al. Highly crystalline layered VS2 nanosheets for all-solid-state lithium batteries with enhanced electrochemical performances. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 10053-63.

23. Xu, S.; Kwok, C. Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Kochetkov, I.; Nazar, L. F. A high capacity all solid-state Li-sulfur battery enabled by conversion-intercalation hybrid cathode architecture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2004239.

24. Shigedomi, T.; Fujita, Y.; Kishi, T.; et al. Li2S-V2S3 -LiI bifunctional material as the positive electrode in the all-solid-state Li/S battery. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 9745-52.

25. Kwok, C. Y.; Xu, S.; Kochetkov, I.; Zhou, L.; Nazar, L. F. High-performance all-solid-state Li2S batteries using an interfacial redox mediator. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 610-8.

26. Izumi, F.; Momma, K. Three-dimensional visualization in powder diffraction. Solid. State. Phenomen. 2007, 130, 15-20.

27. Nakanishi, K.; Yagi, S.; Ohta, T. XAFS measurements under atmospheric pressure in the soft X-ray region. Aip. Conf. Proc. 2010, 1234, 931-4.

28. Kiguchi, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Matsumura, D.; Kondoh, H.; Ohta, T.; Kitajima, Y. Interface structure of alkali-halide heteroepitaxial films studied by X-ray-absorption fine structure. Phys. Rev. B. 1999, 60, 16205-10.

29. Han, F.; Yue, J.; Fan, X.; et al. High-performance all-solid-state lithium-sulfur battery enabled by a mixed-conductive Li2S nanocomposite. Nano. Lett. 2016, 16, 4521-7.

30. Gamo, H.; Hikima, K.; Matsuda, A. Understanding decomposition of electrolytes in all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 10952-63.

31. Kim, J. T.; Rao, A.; Nie, H. Y.; et al. Manipulating Li2S2/Li2S mixed discharge products of all-solid-state lithium sulfur batteries for improved cycle life. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6404.

32. Sun, Z.; Lai, Y.; Lv, N.; et al. Insights on the properties of the O-doped argyrodite sulfide solid electrolytes (Li6PS5-xClOx, x=0-1). ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 54924-35.

33. Murphy, D. W.; Cros, C.; Di Salvo, F. J.; Waszczak, J. V. Preparation and properties of LixVS2 (0 .ltoreq. x .ltoreq. 1). Inorg. Chem. 1977, 16, 3027-31.

Cite This Article

Article
Open Access
LixVSy nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries

How to Cite

Download Citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click on download.

Export Citation File:

Type of Import

Tips on Downloading Citation

This feature enables you to download the bibliographic information (also called citation data, header data, or metadata) for the articles on our site.

Citation Manager File Format

Use the radio buttons to choose how to format the bibliographic data you're harvesting. Several citation manager formats are available, including EndNote and BibTex.

Type of Import

If you have citation management software installed on your computer your Web browser should be able to import metadata directly into your reference database.

Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.

Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.

About This Article

Special Issue

© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
63
Downloads
4
Citations
0
Comments
0
0

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at [email protected].

0
Download PDF
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Energy Materials
ISSN 2770-5900 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/