LixVSy nanocomposite electrodes for high-energy carbon-additive-free all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries
Abstract
All-solid-state (ASS) lithium-sulfur batteries are promising power sources with the potential for high capacity and safety. Lithium metal polysulfide cathodes can address issues arising from the low electronic conductivity of Li2S and S. This study synthesized lithium vanadium polysulfides (LixVSy) by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S and V2S3. The LixVSy system contains nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in an amorphous matrix; lithiation and delithiation occur in both Li2S and LiVS2 during charging and discharging. LiVS2 enhances the electronic conductivity of LixVSy (~10-1-10-2 S cm-1) and the reversibility of charge-discharge reactions because of its high electronic conductivity and layered structure. Therefore, ASS batteries with LixVSy show high capacity (~650 mAh g-1), even without conductive additives. Here, ASS full cells with high loading assembled using a composite cathode comprising Li8VS5.5 and a solid electrolyte in a 80:20 (wt.%) ratio (33 mg cm-2) and a composite Si anode
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Lithium-sulfur batteries have attracted considerable attention as promising next-generation batteries owing to their high capacity and low cost[1,2]. All-solid-state (ASS) lithium-sulfur batteries containing sulfide solid electrolytes (SEs) are particularly promising for practical use because of several reasons. First, there is no risk of polysulfide dissolution in such systems; in contrast, conventional lithium batteries with organic liquid electrolytes undergo capacity degradation due to the formation and dissolution of polysulfides in the electrolyte[3,4]. Second, compared with systems containing oxide-based cathodes, such as LiCoO2 and
Some metal polysulfides and composite electrodes do not require carbon because of their high electronic conductivity[16-18]. In addition, Li-containing metal polysulfide cathodes can employ various anodes, such as Si and Si-based alloys, besides lithium metal. Li3NbS4[18] and Li3CuS2[19] show electronic conductivities of
In this study, the detailed structural analysis of LixVSy, including its charged and discharged states, was conducted using synchrotron XRD measurements, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) measurements to understand the reaction mechanism of systems comprising LixVSy. High-loading full cells comprising Li8VS5.5 and Si without any conductive additives showed a high areal capacity of 15 mAh cm-2. According to the calculation, a high energy density exceeding 800 Wh L-1 and 500 Wh kg-1 will be achieved on enlargement and stacking of the full cells.
EXPERIMENTAL
Preparation of LixVSy cathodes
LixVSy (x = 5-9, y = 4-6) cathodes were prepared by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S (99%, Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co. Ltd.) and V2S3 (99%; Kojundo Chemical Lab. Co. Ltd.) according to a previously described method[20]. A high-crystallinity sample of Li8VS5.5 (denoted as Li8VS5.5-HC) was synthesized under modified processing conditions. Stoichiometric mixtures of Li2S and V2S3 were weighed - 6 g for Li8VS5.5-HC and 1 g for standard Li8VS5.5 - and placed into ZrO2 milling pots (250 mL for Li8VS5.5-HC and 45 mL for
Construction of ASSBs
Composite cathodes were prepared by gently mixing LixVSy and argyrodite-type sulfide SEs (Mitsui Mining & Smelting Co., Ltd.) for 1 h using a planetary ball mill (Pulverisette 7 premium line, Fritsch). To assemble ASS half-cells with a diameter of 10 mm, the sulfide SE was pressed at 30 MPa to fabricate an SE layer, and the composite cathode (10 mg) was placed on the SE layer and pressed at 720 MPa; subsequently, the Li-In alloy was attached to the other side of the SE layer. The resultant cell was sandwiched between two stainless steel (SUS) rods used as current collectors and confined at 160 MPa. Each 1-centimeter square ASS full cell was constructed using a Li8VS5.5 composite cathode and a composite Si anode; the loading mass of the positive and anode layers was 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2, respectively. The fabricated cells were charged and discharged using a charge-discharge measuring device (TOSCAT-3100, Toyo System Co. Ltd.).
Electronic and ionic conductivity measurements
This study measured the electronic and ionic conductivity of composite cathodes by direct current (DC) polarization tests at 25, 45, and 60 °C. SUS/composite cathode/SUS and SUS/Li-In/SE/composite cathode/SE/Li-In/SUS systems were used for electronic and ionic conductivity measurements, respectively. The loading mass of the composite cathode layer in each system was > 30 mg cm-2.
Synchrotron XRD measurements
Synchrotron XRD was used to analyze pristine LixVSy and composite cathodes in charge and discharge states at the BL19B2 beamline of SPring-8 at room temperature. The samples were sealed in glass capillaries (~0.3 mm diameter) under dry Ar. The wavelength of the synchrotron X-ray was 0.5002 Å calibrated by CeO2. The RIETAN-FP program was used for Rietveld refinement[26], and multiphases were added one by one while peak identification was carefully performed to sufficiently reduce residual peaks.
Elemental analysis of LixVSy
To investigate the amounts of Li and V in LixVSy, inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) was conducted using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (Agilent 5110 VDV, Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Before measurements, the samples were thermally decomposed using acids, and their final volume was adjusted using ultrapure water. The amount of S in the samples was measured using an automatic combustion halogen and sulfur analysis system (HSU-35/SQ-10, Anatec Yanaco Co. Ltd. and ICS-2100, Dionex Corp.).
XAFS measurements
The valence states and local structures of the S and V atoms in LixVSy and composite cathodes after charge and discharge tests were examined by S and V K-edge XAFS measurements at the Synchrotron Radiation Center, Ritsumeikan University. The S and V K-edge spectra of the samples were recorded at the BL-10 and BL-3 beamlines, respectively[27]. The incident X-ray beam was monochromatized with a Ge(111) crystal
TEM observations
The LixVSy samples were analyzed by a high-resolution transmission electron microscope (Talos F200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Bright-field TEM micrographs were acquired by a slow-scan charge-coupled device camera (Ceta, FEI Company) at 200 kV of accelerated voltage with 0.5 s exposure time.
Additionally, the composite cathodes before charging and after the second discharging process were analyzed using cryo-scanning TEM (cryo-STEM) on an atomic-resolution analytical electron microscope (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL Ltd.). Before STEM analysis, the samples were thinned to the desired shape using a focused ion beam milling apparatus (NanoDUE’ T NB5000, Hitachi High-Tech Corp.). To investigate the elemental mappings in the samples, STEM-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (STEM-EDX) and STEM-electron energy loss spectroscopy (STEM-EELS) were conducted with EDX (JED-2300T, JEOL Ltd.) and EELS (GIF Quantum-ER, Gatan, Inc.) instruments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization of LixVSy cathodes
Cathode materials with compositions Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, Li8VS5.5, and Li9VS6 were synthesized via ball milling of Li2S and V2S3. As reported in our previous study[20], the theoretical capacity of LixVSy compounds increases with higher Li and S content (increasing x and y), whereas the electronic conductivity correspondingly decreases. The initial charge-discharge profiles of half-cells incorporating LixVSy (x = 5-9,
Figure 1. (A) Rietveld analysis of the synchrotron XRD pattern of Li8VS5.5 with Rwp = 3.13%, Re = 1.64%, and S = 1.91. (B) S K-edge and (C) V K-edge XANES spectra of Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, Li8VS5.5, and Li9VS6 with reference spectra of Li2S, LiVS2, and V2S3. The V K-edge XANES spectrum of Li9VS6 is not shown because of its low S/N ratio.
Figure 1B and C show the S and V K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of the
TEM was used to investigate the microstructures of Li5VS4, Li6VS4.5, Li7VS5, and Li8VS5.5
Figure 2. High-resolution TEM images of (A) Li8VS5.5 and (B) Li8VS5.5-HC (high crystallinity) with LiVS2 and Li2S mapped in red and green, respectively. The color mapping is defined by a difference in lattice spacing. (C) Initial charge-discharge curves of ASSBs containing Li8VS5.5 and Li8VS5.5-HC under a current density of 0.13 mA cm-2 at 25 °C.
Electrochemical properties of Li8VS5.5 cathodes
To determine an optimal composition for electrode fabrication, composite cathodes were prepared by mixing Li8VS5.5 with a sulfide SE at various weight ratios (70/30, 75/25, 80/20, and 85/15). The electronic and ionic conductivities and electrochemical capacities of these composites were systematically analyzed and compared. In our previous study[20], the electronic and ionic conductivities of pure Li8VS5.5 were reported to be 5.9 × 10-2 and 5.6 × 10-6 S cm-2 at room temperature, respectively.
Figure 3A shows the electronic conductivities of the fabricated composite cathodes measured by DC polarization at 25 °C. The electronic conductivity is enhanced by increasing the weight ratio of Li8VS5.5. The electronic conductivity of electrodes containing 70 wt.% of Li8VS5.5 is higher than the ionic conductivity of the SE (ca. 2 × 10-3 S cm-1); therefore, the Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes exhibit sufficient electronic conductivity. The ionic conductivity values for each composite electrode measured by DC polarization at 25, 45, and 60 °C are shown in Figure 3B. The ionic conductivities of the composite electrodes decrease with increasing content of Li8VS5.5. Notably, the ionic conductivities of the composite electrodes are lower than their electronic conductivities, even at 60 °C, indicating that ionic conduction is a rate-limiting process in the composite electrodes.
Figure 3. (A) Electronic and (B) ionic conductivities of composite cathodes comprising Li8VS5.5 and the SE in weight ratios of 70/30, 75/25, 80/20, and 85/15. The electronic conductivities are measured at 25 °C, and the ionic conductivities are measured at 25, 45, and 60 °C. (C) Discharge capacities per composite cathode for ASS cells with different weight ratios of Li8VS5.5 and the SE and the same amount of Li8VS5.5. (D) Charge-discharge curves of ASS full cells containing Li8VS5.5 and Si electrodes. The mass loadings of the positive and anodes are 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2, respectively. The cell is charged and discharged with a constant current and voltage at a rate of 0.01 C (until a rate of 0.001 C) over cut-off voltages of 1.22-3.62 V at 60 °C.
Figure 3C shows the discharge capacities of cells containing composite cathodes with various weight ratios of Li8VS5.5 and the SE at 60 °C. Each composite cathode was fabricated with the same amount of Li8VS5.5, and the discharge capacities of the fabricated cells were calculated using the amount of composite cathode. The ionic conductivity of the cells decreases with increasing weight ratio of Li8VS5.5. Moreover, the amount of composite cathode increases, and the electronic conductivity decreases with decreasing weight ratio of
Figure 3D shows the charge-discharge curves of ASS full cell with Li8VS5.5 and Si electrodes. The cathode contains 33 mg cm-2 of the composite cathode consisting of Li8VS5.5 and SE in a weight ratio of 80/20, whereas the anode contains 10.4 mg cm-2 of the Si composite electrode. The size of the full cell is a 1 × 1 centimeter square. Considering a discharge capacity of ca. 15 mAh cm-2 and an average operating voltage of 1.646 V, 20 stacked A4 size (210 mm × 297 mm) ASSBs are expected to show high volumetric and gravimetric energy densities of 853 Wh L-1 and 515 Wh kg-1, respectively, in a calculation. The cycling performance of the ASS full cell is shown in Supplementary Figure 3A. The capacity retention rate decreases to ~80% after the 10th cycle. Because Li8VS5.5 shows large volume changes during the charge-discharge process, the cell with a high mass loading shows capacity degradation owing to the disconnection of conduction paths between the solid and solid interfaces. Supplementary Figure 3B demonstrates that a half-cell containing Li8VS5.5 with a low mass loading of 6.4 mg cm-2 exhibits excellent cycling performance. Supplementary Figure 3C presents the charge-discharge profiles for the first five cycles of the same cell. With increasing cycle numbers, electrode polarization decreased while capacity improved, indicating progressive activation of the electrode. This activation behavior in the initial cycles is consistent with that observed in previously reported ASS lithium-sulfur batteries[29-31].
The volume-change rate of Li8VS5.5 during the charging process was calculated by estimating the molar volumes of Li8VS5.5 and VS5.5 listed in Supplementary Table 3. The molar volume of Li8VS5.5 was calculated from its molar mass and measured density value (2.06 g cm-3). The molar volume of VS5.5 was calculated from the molar ratio, molar mass, and density values of S and VS2. After charging, Li8VS5.5 shows a lower shrinking rate (36.5%) than Li2S (42.1%). Moreover, compared with Li2S, Li8VS5.5 shows a better electronic conductivity and volume change rate. To improve the cycle performance of ASSBs containing Li8VS5.5, the volume changes of Li8VS5.5 during charge-discharge tests should be investigated by operando measurements. Several approaches have been proposed for reducing crack formation in cells, such as selecting anodes with large volume changes to adjust the total volume change of cells. Details regarding the volume changes of
Reaction mechanism of Li8VS5.5 cathodes
Li8VS5.5 enables the construction of high-energy-density ASSBs. To investigate the structural changes during charging and discharging, synchrotron XRD measurements were conducted on composite Li8VS5.5 cathodes before and after charge and discharge [Figure 4]. For the XRD measurements, the ASSBs with a Li8VS5.5 to SE weight ratio of 85/15 were fabricated to detect structural changes of Li8VS5.5 clearly by increasing amount of Li8VS5.5 in composite cathodes. The XRD patterns of Li8VS5.5 and the SE are shown in Figure 4. The XRD pattern before charging [Figure 4A] contains diffraction peaks attributable to Li2S, LiVS2, and the SE, whereas that after charging [Figure 4B] mainly contains diffraction peaks attributable to the SE, possibly owing to the formation of amorphous S by the delithiation of Li2S. In addition, the diffraction peaks attributed to LiVS2 are shifted to higher angles because of delithiation from LiVS2. Moreover, the XRD pattern after charging indicates the partial decomposition of the SE to LiCl. The XRD pattern recorded after the discharging process [Figure 4C] contains diffraction peaks attributed to Li2S resulting from lithiation
Figure 4. Rietveld analysis of the synchrotron XRD patterns of Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes (A) before charging, (B) after charging, and (C) after discharging.
Crystallographic data of LiVS2 in Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes (a) before charging, (b) after charging, and (c) after discharging, and reference data of LiVS2 and VS2
Figure 5 shows the S K-edge spectra of the composite cathodes after the first and third charge and discharge. The spectra of the samples after the first charge and discharge are similar to the patterns after the third charge and discharge, respectively, suggesting that the structure changes reversibly over a few cycles.
Figure 5. S K-edge XANES spectra of Li8VS5.5 composite cathodes before and after the first and third charge and discharge tests.
The XRD patterns and XANES spectra before and after charge-discharge tests indicate reversible delithiation and lithiation. Cryo-STEM measurements were conducted on the Li8VS5.5 composite cathode to investigate nanoscale structural changes after the second discharge test. Figure 6A and
Figure 6. (A) BF-STEM images of composite cathodes consisting of Li8VS5.5 and the SE after the second discharge test. The EDX measurement area is highlighted by a red square. (B) ADF-STEM image and EDX mappings of (C) P, (D) Cl, (E) V, (F) S, and (G) O K-edges. Yellow circles indicate the SE areas.
Figure 7. (A) HAADF-STEM images of composite cathodes consisting of Li8VS5.5 and the SE after the second discharge test. Yellow and orange dotted circles indicate the SE area and interface between Li8VS5.5 and the SE, respectively. STEM-EELS mappings of (B) Li, (C) S, and (D) V. (E) Sets of decomposed spectra of components 1-3 and (F-H) their distribution maps.
Figure 7E-H shows decomposed spectra and their distribution mappings, respectively. Component 1 is distributed in the bulk of Li8VS5.5, whereas component 2 is observed at the interface of Li8VS5.5 and the SE. The V L-edge peak of component 2 is shifted to a higher position than that of component 1, indicating an increase in the valence of V. Moreover, the peak intensity of the O K-edge in component 2 is higher than that in component 1. Component 3, which shows a low intensity for the V L-edge and a high intensity for the O K-edge, is distributed mainly in the SE areas. Figure 7 indicates a deficit of Li and S and an increase in the valence of V in the Li8VS5.5 region near the interface of Li8VS5.5 and the SE, suggesting the formation of an interphase between Li8VS5.5 and the SE after a few charge-discharge cycles. In addition, the SE undergoes delithiation and partial decomposition by oxygen. Maintaining a low oxygen content can improve the cycle performance of ASSBs with LixVSy. Moreover, investigating the behavior of the LixVSy-SE interphase is critical for an accurate battery performance analysis.
Comparison with other lithium-containing vanadium sulfide electrodes
A comparison of Li8VS5.5, 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24], and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2[25] is provided in Table 2. Li8VS5.5 contains the highest amount of Li2S, which is an insulator; however, because of the structure of the nanocomposite in the amorphous matrix, high electronic conductivity was obtained. Despite containing a high amount of Li2S, ASSBs with Li8VS5.5 (even those with high loading) show the highest capacity among all the ASSBs with lithium-containing vanadium sulfide materials because nanosized LiVS2 in the amorphous matrix forms sufficient electron conduction paths. Our previous study demonstrated that Li5VS4 and Li6VS4.5 exhibit superior rate performance than Li8VS5.5. In particular, the Li6VS4.5 half-cell delivered a higher areal capacity at a relatively high current density of 1.3 mA cm-2 compared with 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24] and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2[25] [Supplementary Table 4]. These results indicate that tuning the composition of LixVSy is an effective strategy for improving rate performance.
Comparison of the properties of Li8VS5.5, 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI, and core-shell Li2S/LiVS2
Active material | Li8VS5.5 (this work) | 90(0.75Li2S·0.25V2S3)·10LiI[24] | Core shell of Li2S/LiVS2[25] |
Structure | Nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in amorphous matrix | LiVS2 and Li2S-LiI nanoparticles dispersed in the Li2S-V2S3-LiI amorphous matrix | Li2S core and LiVS2 shell |
Feature | Sufficient electron conduction paths formed by nano LiVS2, despite a high content of Li2S | Electrode-electrolyte bifunctional material | Interfacial redox mediator (LixVS2) |
Synthesis | Ball milling | Ball milling | Reacting Li2S with VCl4 in tetrahydrofuran |
Electronic conductivity at RT | 0.059 S cm-1 | > 0.1 S cm-1 | 5.5 S cm-1 |
Ionic conductivity at RT | 5.6 × 10-6 S cm-1 | 2.5 × 10-4 S cm-1 | 1.3 × 10-5 S cm-1 |
Li2S:LiVS2 | 77.8:22.2 (wt.%) | 50:50 (wt.%) | ~60:~40 (wt.%) |
Composite cathodes including active material and SE | |||
Active material:SE | 80:20 (wt.%) | 100:0 (wt.%) | 50:50 (wt.%) |
Li2S in composite cathodes | 62.2 wt.% | 45 wt.% | ~30 wt.% |
Electronic conductivity at RT | 1.2 × 10-2 S cm-1 | >0.1 S cm-1 | 5.1 × 10-1 S cm-1 |
Ionic conductivity at RT | 2.0 × 10-5 S cm-1 | 2.5 × 10-4 S cm-1 | 1.5 × 10-4 S cm-1 |
High-loading performance[a] | 33 mg cm-2,15 mAh cm-2 (full cell, 60 °C, 0.2 mA cm-2) | ca. 4.5 mg cm-2, ca. 1.7 mAh cm-2 (half-cell, 25 °C, 0.13 mA cm-2) | 20 mg cm-2, 5.3 mAh cm-2 (half-cell, 60 °C, 0.25 mA cm-2) |
CONCLUSIONS
LixVSy synthesized by the mechanochemical treatment of Li2S and V2S3 contains nanocomposites of Li2S and LiVS2 in an amorphous matrix and shows high electronic conductivity (10-1-10-2 S cm-1) and capacity (~650 mAh g-1). Delithiation and lithiation proceed in both Li2S and LiVS2 during charge-discharge reactions. Moreover, LiVS2 enhances the electronic conductivity of LixVSy and the reversibility of charge-discharge reactions owing to its high electronic conductivity and layered structure. ASS full cells with a high mass loading of 33 and 10.4 mg cm-2 of a composite cathode comprising 80/20 (wt.%) of Li8VS5.5 and the SE and a composite Si anode, respectively, show a high areal capacity of 15 mAh cm-2. According to the calculation, enlarging such full cells to
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and interpretation: Otoyama, M.; Wanibuchi, M.
Performed data acquisition for structural characterization: Takeuchi, T.; Ishida, N.; Taguchi, N.; Kitta, M.
Supervised: Sano, H.; Kawamoto, K.; Kuratani, K.; Sakaebe, H.
All authors revised the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The data supporting this work is provided in the Supplementary Materials.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was partially supported by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) under the SOLiD-EV Project (JPNP18003).
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.
Supplementary Materials
REFERENCES
2. Manthiram, A.; Fu, Y.; Chung, S. H.; Zu, C.; Su, Y. S. Rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11751-87.
3. Yamin, H.; Gorenshtein, A.; Penciner, J.; Sternberg, Y.; Peled, E. Lithium sulfur battery - oxidation reduction-mechanisms of polysulfides in Thf solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1988, 135, 1045-8.
4. Shim, J.; Striebel, K. A.; Cairns, E. J. The lithium/sulfur rechargeable cell: effects of electrode composition and solvent on cell performance. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2002, 149, A1321.
5. Sakuda, A.; Hayashi, A.; Tatsumisago, M. Sulfide solid electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2261.
6. Fujita, Y.; Münch, K.; Asakura, T.; et al. Dynamic volume change of Li2S-based active material and the influence of stacking pressure on capacity in all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36, 7533-40.
7. Kamaya, N.; Homma, K.; Yamakawa, Y.; et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 682-6.
8. Kato, Y.; Hori, S.; Saito, T.; et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1, 201630.
9. Li, Y.; Song, S.; Kim, H.; et al. A lithium superionic conductor for millimeter-thick battery electrode. Science 2023, 381, 50-3.
10. Boulineau, S.; Courty, M.; Tarascon, J.; Viallet, V. Mechanochemical synthesis of Li-argyrodite Li6PS5X (X = Cl, Br, I) as sulfur-based solid electrolytes for all solid state batteries application. Solid. State. Ion. 2012, 221, 1-5.
11. Yang, X.; Luo, J.; Sun, X. Towards high-performance solid-state Li-S batteries: from fundamental understanding to engineering design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2140-95.
12. Zhang, W.; Leichtweiß, T.; Culver, S. P.; et al. The detrimental effects of carbon additives in Li10GeP2S12-based solid-state batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017, 9, 35888-96.
13. Strauss, F.; Stepien, D.; Maibach, J.; et al. Influence of electronically conductive additives on the cycling performance of argyrodite-based all-solid-state batteries. RSC. Adv. 2020, 10, 1114-9.
14. Walther, F.; Randau, S.; Schneider, Y.; et al. Influence of carbon additives on the decomposition pathways in cathodes of lithium thiophosphate-based all-solid-state batteries. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 6123-36.
15. Fang, R.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Manthiram, A.; Goodenough, J. B. Achieving stable all-solid-state lithium-metal batteries by tuning the cathode-electrolyte interface and ionic/electronic transport within the cathode. Mater. Today. 2023, 64, 52-60.
16. Balach, J.; Linnemann, J.; Jaumann, T.; Giebeler, L. Metal-based nanostructured materials for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 6, 23127-68.
17. Li, X.; Sun, X.; Xiao, B.; Wang, D.; Liang, J. Inorganic polysulfide chemistries for better energy storage systems. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56, 3547-57.
18. Sakuda, A. Metal polysulfides as high capacity electrode active materials - toward superior secondary batteries based on sulfur chemistry. Electrochemistry 2023, 91, 102003.
19. Kawasaki, Y.; Tsukasaki, H.; Ayama, T.; et al. Synthesis and electrochemical properties of Li3CuS2 as a positive electrode material for all-solid-state batteries. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2021, 4, 20-4.
20. Otoyama, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Taguchi, N.; Kuratani, K.; Sakaebe, H. Mechanochemical synthesis and electrochemical properties of
21. Ji, Q.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; et al. Metallic vanadium disulfide nanosheets as a platform material for multifunctional electrode applications. Nano. Lett. 2017, 17, 4908-16.
22. Cai, L.; Zhang, Q.; Mwizerwa, J. P.; et al. Highly crystalline layered VS2 nanosheets for all-solid-state lithium batteries with enhanced electrochemical performances. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 10053-63.
23. Xu, S.; Kwok, C. Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; Kochetkov, I.; Nazar, L. F. A high capacity all solid-state Li-sulfur battery enabled by conversion-intercalation hybrid cathode architecture. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2004239.
24. Shigedomi, T.; Fujita, Y.; Kishi, T.; et al. Li2S-V2S3 -LiI bifunctional material as the positive electrode in the all-solid-state Li/S battery. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 9745-52.
25. Kwok, C. Y.; Xu, S.; Kochetkov, I.; Zhou, L.; Nazar, L. F. High-performance all-solid-state Li2S batteries using an interfacial redox mediator. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2023, 16, 610-8.
26. Izumi, F.; Momma, K. Three-dimensional visualization in powder diffraction. Solid. State. Phenomen. 2007, 130, 15-20.
27. Nakanishi, K.; Yagi, S.; Ohta, T. XAFS measurements under atmospheric pressure in the soft X-ray region. Aip. Conf. Proc. 2010, 1234, 931-4.
28. Kiguchi, M.; Yokoyama, T.; Matsumura, D.; Kondoh, H.; Ohta, T.; Kitajima, Y. Interface structure of alkali-halide heteroepitaxial films studied by X-ray-absorption fine structure. Phys. Rev. B. 1999, 60, 16205-10.
29. Han, F.; Yue, J.; Fan, X.; et al. High-performance all-solid-state lithium-sulfur battery enabled by a mixed-conductive Li2S nanocomposite. Nano. Lett. 2016, 16, 4521-7.
30. Gamo, H.; Hikima, K.; Matsuda, A. Understanding decomposition of electrolytes in all-solid-state lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 10952-63.
31. Kim, J. T.; Rao, A.; Nie, H. Y.; et al. Manipulating Li2S2/Li2S mixed discharge products of all-solid-state lithium sulfur batteries for improved cycle life. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6404.
32. Sun, Z.; Lai, Y.; Lv, N.; et al. Insights on the properties of the O-doped argyrodite sulfide solid electrolytes (Li6PS5-xClOx, x=0-1). ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 54924-35.
Cite This Article

How to Cite
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
About This Article
Special Issue
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data

Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at [email protected].