REFERENCES
1. Davis, P. E. D.; Nicholls, K. W.; Holland, D. M.; et al. Suppressed basal melting in the eastern Thwaites Glacier grounding zone. Nature 2023, 614, 479-85.
2. Song, F.; Zhang, G. J.; Ramanathan, V.; Leung, L. R. Trends in surface equivalent potential temperature: a more comprehensive metric for global warming and weather extremes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022, 119, e2117832119.
3. Jang, Y.; Yang, J. Environmental policy and the evolution of nuclear trade network: insights from the European Union. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2024, 68, 425-32.
4. Ahlvik, L.; Van Den Bijgaart, I. Screening green innovation through carbon pricing. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2024, 124, 102932.
5. Chen, Y.; Zhang, D.; Guo, K.; Ji, Q. Emission trading schemes and cross-border mergers and acquisitions. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2024, 124, 102949.
6. Zhu, X.; Li, D. How to promote the construction of low‐carbon cities in China? An urban complex ecosystem perspective. Sustain. Dev. 2024, 32, 4354-73.
7. Zhang, S.; Ma, X.; Cui, Q.; Liu, J. Does the low carbon transition impact urban resilience? Evidence from China’s pilot cities for carbon emission trading. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31, 11128-49.
8. Xu, S.; Deng, Y.; Nepal, R.; Jamasb, T. Geopolitical conflict and risk and the EU energy trading: a dynamic evolutionary networks analysis. Energy. Econ. 2026, 158, 109332.
9. Xia, X.; Zeng, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, C.; Li, X. Carbon constraints and carbon emission reduction: an evolutionary game model within the energy-intensive sector. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2024, 244, 122916.
10. Wang, B.; Huang, C.; Wang, H.; Liao, F. Impact factors in Chinese construction enterprises’ carbon emission-reduction intentions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health. 2022, 19, 16929.
11. Pei, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Cao, J. Environmental regulation and carbon emission: the mediation effect of technical efficiency. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117599.
12. Deng, Y.; Dong, K.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F.; Xue, J. How does environmental regulation affect the double dividend for energy firms? Evidence from China’s EPT policy. Econ. Anal. Policy. 2023, 79, 807-20.
13. Meng, L.; Liu, K.; He, J.; Han, C.; Liu, P. Carbon emission reduction behavior strategies in the shipping industry under government regulation: a tripartite evolutionary game analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 378, 134556.
14. Xu, S.; Zhao, X.; Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. Towards the environmental sustainability path: the role of fintech, renewable energy consumption, and climate policy uncertainty. Energy. Policy. 2025, 207, 114841.
15. Jiao, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Yang, S. Carbon reduction behavior of waste power battery recycling enterprises considering learning effects. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 341, 118084.
16. Gui, H.; Xue, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, L. Research on carbon emissions reduction strategy considering government subsidy and free riding behavior. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2022, 39, 329-41.
17. Wang, J.; Sun, F.; Lv, K.; Wang, L. Industrial agglomeration and firm energy intensity: how important is spatial proximity? Energy. Econ. 2022, 112, 106155.
18. Barrows, G.; Ollivier, H. Foreign demand, developing country exports, and CO2 emissions: firm-level evidence from India. J. Dev. Econ. 2021, 149, 102587.
19. Chen, H.; Guo, W.; Feng, X.; et al. The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on the total factor productivity of listed enterprises in China. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2021, 169, 105457.
20. Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Qian, X. Revisiting firm innovation and environmental performance: new evidence from Japanese firm-level data. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 281, 124446.
21. Bian, H.; Jin, F.; Tong, X. Carbon reduction consciousness, determinants and value of low-carbon transition: evidence from textual and empirical analysis of Chinese listed manufacturing enterprises. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2023, 88, 1301-23.
22. Jiang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Asante, D.; Mintah Ampaw, E.; Asante, B. The effects of executives' low-carbon cognition on corporate low-carbon performance: a study of managerial discretion in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 357, 132015.
23. Hossain, A.; Saadi, S.; Amin, A. S. Does CEO risk-aversion affect carbon emission? J. Bus. Ethics. 2022, 182, 1171-98.
24. Albitar, K.; Al-Shaer, H.; Liu, Y. S. Corporate commitment to climate change: th e effect of eco-innovation and climate governance. Res. Policy. 2023, 52, 104697.
25. Valls Martínez, M. D. C.; Santos-Jaén, M.; Soriano Román, R.; Martín-Cervantes, P. A. Are gender and cultural diversities on board related to corporate CO2 emissions? J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 363, 132638.
26. Caby, J.; Coron, C.; Ziane, Y. How does gender diversity in top management teams affect carbon disclosure and its quality: evidence from the technological industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2024, 199, 123077.
27. Al-Shaer, H.; Zaman, M. Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality. J. Contemp. Account. Econ. 2016, 12, 210-22.
28. Abd Majid, N.; Jaaffar, A. H. The effect of women’s leadership on carbon disclosure by the top 100 global energy leaders. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8491.
29. Birindelli, G.; Iannuzzi, A. P.; Savioli, M. The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2019, 26, 1485-99.
30. Fan, P.; Qian, X.; Wang, J. Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan. Pac. Basin. Finance. J. 2023, 77, 101931.
31. Nuber, C.; Velte, P. Board gender diversity and carbon emissions: European evidence on curvilinear relationships and critical mass. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 1958-92.
32. Konadu, R.; Ahinful, G. S.; Boakye, D. J.; Elbardan, H. Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2022, 174, 121279.
33. Walls, J. L.; Berrone, P.; Phan, P. H. Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link? Strateg. Manag. J. 2012, 33, 885-913.
34. Eagly, A. H. Sex differences in social behavior: a social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1987.
35. Bandiera, O.; Parekh, N.; Petrongolo, B.; Rao, M. Men are from mars, and women too: a bayesian meta‐analysis of overconfidence experiments. Economica 2022, 89, S38-70.
36. Campopiano, G.; Gabaldón, P.; Gimenez-Jimenez, D. Women directors and corporate social performance: an integrative review of the literature and a future research agenda. J. Bus. Ethics. 2022, 182, 717-46.
37. Williams, M.; Polman, E. Is it me or her? How gender composition evokes interpersonally sensitive behavior on collaborative cross-boundary projects. Organ. Sci. 2015, 26, 334-55.
38. Ward, S. J.; King, L. A. Gender differences in emotion explain women’s lower immoral intentions and harsher moral condemnation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2018, 44, 653-69.
39. Lu, J.; Herremans, I. M. Board gender diversity and environmental performance: an industries perspective. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2019, 28, 1449-64.
40. Casprini, E.; Pucci, T.; Zanni, L. From growth goals to proactive organizational resilience: first evidence in women-led and non-women-led Italian wineries. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 17, 1017-36.
41. He, X.; Jiang, S. Does gender diversity matter for green innovation? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2019, 28, 1341-56.
42. Atif, M.; Hossain, M.; Alam, M. S.; Goergen, M. Does board gender diversity affect renewable energy consumption? J. Corp. Financ. 2021, 66, 101665.
43. Méndez-Picazo, M.; Galindo-Martín, M.; Castaño-Martínez, M. Effects of sociocultural and economic factors on social entrepreneurship and sustainable development. J. Innov. Knowl. 2021, 6, 69-77.
44. Foss, N.; Lee, P. M.; Murtinu, S.; Scalera, V. G. The XX factor: female managers and innovation in a cross-country setting. Lead. Q. 2022, 33, 101537.
45. Jiang, Y. G.; Asante, D.; Zhang, J.; Cao, M. J. The effects of environmental factors on low-carbon innovation strategy: a study of the executive environmental leadership in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121998.
46. Lakhal, F.; Hamrouni, A.; Jilani, I.; Mahjoub, I.; Benkraiem, R. The power of inclusion: does leadership gender diversity promote corporate and green innovation? Res. Int. Bus. Financ. 2024, 67, 102128.
47. Tang, S.; Nadkarni, S.; Wei, L.; Zhang, S. X. Balancing the Yin and Yang: TMT gender diversity, psychological safety, and firm ambidextrous strategic orientation in Chinese high-tech SMEs. Acad. Manag. J. 2021, 64, 1578-604.
48. Horbach, J. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources. Res. Policy. 2008, 37, 163-73.
49. Lee, C.; Wang, C. Financial development, technological innovation and energy security: evidence from Chinese provincial experience. Energy. Econ. 2022, 112, 106161.
50. Glass, C.; Cook, A. Do women leaders promote positive change? Analyzing the effect of gender on business practices and diversity initiatives. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 57, 823-37.
51. Atif, M.; Alam, M. S.; Hossain, M. Firm sustainable investment: are female directors greener? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2020, 29, 3449-69.
52. Post, C.; Rahman, N.; Rubow, E. Green governance: boards of directors’ composition and environmental corporate social responsibility. Bus. Soc. 2011, 50, 189-223.
53. Glass, C.; Cook, A.; Ingersoll, A. R. Do women leaders promote sustainability? Analyzing the effect of corporate governance composition on environmental performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2015, 25, 495-511.
54. Wu, L.; Wang, C.; Ren, H.; Zhang, W. How does executive green cognition affect enterprise green technology innovation? The mediating effect of ESG performance. Heliyon 2024, 10, e34287.
55. Pan, L.; Mcnamara, G.; Devers, C. E.; Yonish, L. M. Taking a broader view: female directors, CEO strategic attention breadth, and firm performance. Organ. Sci. 2025, 36, 737-61.
56. Li, X.; Guo, F.; Wang, J. A path towards enterprise environmental performance improvement: how does CEO green experience matter? Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2023, 33, 820-38.
57. Yasir, M.; Majid, A.; Yasir, M.; Qudratullah, H. Promoting environmental performance in manufacturing industry of developing countries through environmental orientation and green business strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 275, 123003.
58. Nawaz Khan, A. Is green leadership associated with employees’ green behavior? Role of green human resource management. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2022, 66, 1962-82.
59. Li, G.; Wang, X.; Su, S.; Su, Y. How green technological innovation ability influences enterprise competitiveness. Technol. Soc. 2019, 59, 101136.
60. Wu, Q. Power play in carbon trading market: how status of executives with R&D background incentives companies’ low-carbon innovation. Energy. Policy. 2024, 188, 114049.
61. Sarwar, H.; Aftab, J.; Ishaq, M. I.; Atif, M. Achieving business competitiveness through corporate social responsibility and dynamic capabilities: an empirical evidence from emerging economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 386, 135820.
62. Chen, C.; Yan, Y.; Jia, X.; Wang, T.; Chai, M. The impact of executives' green experience on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: evidence from China. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 366, 121819.
63. Ambec, S.; De Donder, P. Environmental policy with green consumerism. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2022, 111, 102584.
64. Chevrollier, N.; Van Lieshout, J. W. F. C.; Argyrou, A.; Amelink, J. Carbon emission reduction: understanding the micro‐foundations of dynamic capabilities in companies with a strategic orientation for sustainability performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2023, 33, 968-84.
65. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Ouyang, X.; Xie, Y. Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 359, 132061.
66. Chu, S. Are women greener? Board gender diversity and corporate green technology innovation in China. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 93, 1001-20.
67. Wang, S.; Li, J. How carbon emission trading mechanism and supply chain digitization affect manufacturing enterprises’ competitiveness? Evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 452, 142164.
68. Bolton, P.; Kacperczyk, M. Do investors care about carbon risk? J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 142, 517-49.
69. Kong, G.; Huang, J.; Kong, D.; Zhu, L. Female executives, industrial robots, and stock price crash risk. Financ. Res. Lett. 2023, 57, 104253.
70. Baixauli-Soler, J. S.; Belda-Ruiz, M.; Sanchez-Marin, G. Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 451-63.
71. Huang, H.; Long, R.; Chen, H.; Sun, K.; Li, Q. Exploring public attention about green consumption on Sina Weibo: using text mining and deep learning. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 30, 674-85.
72. Duriau, V. J.; Reger, R. K.; Pfarrer, M. D. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Org. Res. Methods. 2007, 10, 5-34.
73. Barney, J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Adv. Strateg. Manag. 1991, 17, 3-10.
74. Teece, D. J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strat. Mgmt. J. 1997, 18, 509-33.
75. Hu, R. F.; Xu, W. Q.; Yang, Y. L. The evolution of electric technology in the context of China's low-carbon transformation: a patent analysis. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2023, 15, 176-94.
76. Long, F.; Lin, F.; Ge, C. Impact of China's environmental protection tax on corporate performance: empirical data from heavily polluting industries. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 2022, 97, 106892.
77. Chen, Y.; Fan, Z.; Gu, X.; Zhou, L. Arrival of young talent: the send-down movement and rural education in China. Am. Econ. Rev. 2020, 110, 3393-430.
