REFERENCES
2. World Health Organization. Fact sheet. Climate change and health; 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Paris agreement; In: Adopted at the twenty-first session of the Conference of the Parties, Paris, 30 November-13 December 2015. Available from: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
4. United Nations Environment Programme. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction 2024/2025; Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-20242025 [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
5. United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities; 2026. Available from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/cities/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
6. United Nations. World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision; 2019. Available from: https://population.un.org/wup/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
7. Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. 8 - Urban systems and other settlements. Cambridge University Press; 2023. pp. 861-952.
8. International Energy Agency. Buildings; 2025. Available from: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
9. Röck, M.; Saade, M. R. M.; Balouktsi, M.; et al. Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation. Appl. Energy 2020, 258, 114107.
10. Lützkendorf, T.; Balouktsi, M. Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations. Build. Cities 2022, 3, 964-73.
11. United Nations Environment Programme. Global status report for buildings and construction 2025-2026; 2026. Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-2025-2026 [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
12. Winterich, K. P.; Reczek, R. W.; Makov, T. How lack of knowledge on emissions and psychological biases deter consumers from taking effective action to mitigate climate change. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2024, 52, 1475-94.
13. Spence, A.; Poortinga, W.; Pidgeon, N. The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Anal. 2012, 32, 957-72.
14. United Nations Environment Programme. 2021 global status report for buildings and construction: towards a zero-emission, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector. Nairobi; 2021. Available from: https://globalabc.org/resources/publications/2021-global-status-report-buildings-and-construction [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
15. Friedlingstein, P.; O'sullivan, M.; Jones, M. W.; et al. Global carbon budget 2024. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 965-1039.
16. Quesada, B.; Arneth, A.; Robertson, E.; De Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Potential strong contribution of future anthropogenic land-use and land-cover change to the terrestrial carbon cycle. Environ. Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 064023.
17. Waleed, M.; Sajjad, M.; Shazil, M. S. Urbanization-led land cover change impacts terrestrial carbon storage capacity: a high-resolution remote sensing-based nation-wide assessment in Pakistan (1990-2020). Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2024, 105, 107396.
19. Timmons, D.; Zirogiannis, N.; Lutz, M. Location matters: population density and carbon emissions from residential building energy use in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2016, 22, 137-46.
20. Güneralp, B.; Zhou, Y.; Ürge Vorsatz, D.; et al. Global scenarios of urban density and its impacts on building energy use through 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 8945-50.
21. Gill, B.; Moeller, S.; GHG Emissions and the rural-urban divide. A Carbon footprint analysis based on the German official income and expenditure survey. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 145, 160-9.
22. Glaeser, E. L.; Kahn, M. E. The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. J. Urban Econ. 2010, 67, 404-18.
23. Cervero, R.; Kockelman, K. Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 1997, 2, 199-219.
24. Chen, C.; Liu, G.; Meng, F.; Hao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Casazza, M. Energy consumption and carbon footprint accounting of urban and rural residents in Beijing through consumer lifestyle approach. Ecol. Ind. 2019, 98, 575-86.
25. Ribeiro, H. V.; Rybski, D.; Kropp, J. P. Effects of changing population or density on urban carbon dioxide emissions. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3204.
26. Acheampong, R. A.; Silva, E. A. Land use-transport interaction modeling: a review of the literature and future research directions. J. Trans. Land Use 2015, 8, 11-38.
27. Kakaraparthi, S. K.; Kockelman, K. M. Application of urbansim to the Austin, Texas, region: integrated-model forecasts for the year 2030. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 2011, 137, 238-47.
28. Texas Demographic Center. Vintage 2024 population projections for Texas counties, 2020-2060; 2025. Available from: https://demographics.texas.gov/Projections/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
29. U S Bureau of Economic Analysis. Regional economic accounts; 2026. Available from: https://www.bea.gov/data/economic-accounts/regional [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
30. Allen, D. T.; Tullos, E.; Chen, Q.; et al. Greenhouse gas inventory for Texas. Austin, Texas: Texas Commission on Environmental Quality; 2025. Available from: https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/agency/climate-pollution-reduction-grants/2022-texas-greenhouse-gas-inventory.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
31. U S Environmental Protection Agency. State GHG emissions and removals; 2025. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/state-ghg-emissions-and-removals [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
32. Zhang, M.; Chen, E.; Zhang, C.; Liu, C.; Li, J. Multi-scenario simulation of land use change and ecosystem service value based on the Markov-FLUS model in Ezhou City, China. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6237.
34. Texas Water Development Board. 2025 buildings with population datasets; 2025. Available from: https://twdb-flood-planning-resources-twdb.hub.arcgis.com/pages/buildings-feb2025 [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
35. Goldstein, B.; Gounaridis, D.; Newell, J. P. The carbon footprint of household energy use in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 19122-30.
36. Arehart, J. H.; Pomponi, F.; D'amico, B.; Srubar, W. V. A New estimate of building floor space in North America. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 5161-70.
37. Esri. U.S. Counties (Generalized). Esri; 2014. Available from: https://services1.arcgis.com/Hi6kEmQzn9cl2oYk/arcgis/rest/services/counties_polygon__2_Dunn/FeatureServer/0/metadata?f=html&format=default [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
38. TTerando, A. J.; Costanza, J.; Belyea, C.; Dunn, R. R.; Mckerrow, A.; Collazo, J. A. The Southern megalopolis: using the past to predict the future of urban sprawl in the southeast U.S. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, e102261.
39. Vargo, J.; Habeeb, D.; Stone, B. The importance of land cover change across urban–rural typologies for climate modeling. J. Environ. Manag. 2013, 114, 243-52.
40. Fleckenstein, R.; Wellington, D.; Jin, S.; et al. A framework for integrating spatiotemporal deep learning methods with landsat for annual land cover and impervious surface mapping. Remote Sens. Environ. 2026, 338, 115347.
41. Jin, S.; Robinson, T.; Dewitz, J.; Smith, K.; Danielson, P.; Postma, K. An automated compositing method for producing annual clear images from Landsat Collection 2 for annual NLCD production. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2025, 144, 104920.
42. Texas Water Development Board. About the TWDB flood planning building dataset; 2021. Available from: https://www.twdb.texas.gov/flood/planning/doc/BuildingsDocumentation_June2021.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
43. Texas Demographic Center. Projections of the total population of Texas and its counties, 2020-2060: methodology for the vintage 2024 population projections; 2025. Available from: https://demographics.texas.gov/Resources/TPEPP/Projections/2024/2024_Methodology.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
44. U S Geological Survey (USGS) Gap Analysis Project. Protected areas database of the United States (PAD-US) 4.1; 2024.
45. Waddell, P. UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation, and environmental planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 2002, 68, 297-314.
46. Clarke, K. C.; Hoppen, S.; Gaydos, L. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ. Plann. B Plann. Des. 1997, 24, 247-61.
47. Guan, Q. Getting started with pSLEUTH. Papers in Natural Resources. 2008. Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1220&context=natrespapers [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
48. PPontius, R. G.; Boersma, W.; Castella, J.; et al. Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change. Ann. Reg. Sci. 2008, 42, 11-37.
49. Hu, M. Embodied carbon emissions of the residential building stock in the United States and the effectiveness of mitigation strategies. Climate 2022, 10, 135.
50. Ding, Q.; Shao, H.; Chen, X.; Zhang, C. Urban land conversion reduces soil organic carbon density under impervious surfaces. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 2022, 36, e2021GB007293.
51. Wei, Z.; Wu, S.; Yan, X.; Zhou, S. Density and stability of soil organic carbon beneath impervious surfaces in urban areas. PLOS ONE 2014, 9, e109380.
52. Yan, Y.; Kuang, W.; Zhang, C.; Chen, C. Impacts of impervious surface expansion on soil organic carbon - a spatially explicit study. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17905.
53. U S Energy Information Administration. Highlights for structural characteristics of U.S. homes by state, 2020; 2023. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2020/state/pdf/State%20Structural%20Characteristics.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
54. U S Energy Information Administration. Table CO2.6: electric power sector CO2 emissions estimates from energy consumption, 2024.; 2026. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_sum/html/pdf/sum_co2_eu.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
55. U S Energy Information Administration. Table CO2.5: transportation sector CO2 emissions estimates from energy consumption, 2024; 2026. Available from: https://www.eia.gov/state/seds/sep_sum/html/pdf/sum_co2_eu.pdf [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
56. Ramage, M. H.; Burridge, H.; Busse-wicher, M.; et al. The wood from the trees: the use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 333-59.
58. Dixon, R. K.; Solomon, A. M.; Brown, S.; Houghton, R. A.; Trexier, M. C.; Wisniewski, J. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 1994, 263, 185-90.
59. Davidson, E. A.; Ackerman, I. L. Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils. Biogeochemistry 1993, 20, 161-93.
60. Zhang, W.; Ma, J.; Liu, M.; Li, C. Impact of urban expansion on forest carbonsequestration: a study in Northeastern China. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 29, 451-61.
61. Guo, J.; Zhang, M. Exploring the patterns and drivers of urban expansion in the Texas triangle megaregion. Land 2021, 10, 1244.
62. City of Houston Planning & Development Department. Livable Places chapter 42 & 26 development incentives; 2023. Available from: https://www.houstontx.gov/planning/livable_42_26.html [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
63. Fechter, J. Austin enacts sweeping reforms to cut down housing costs. Available from: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/05/17/austin-lot-size-housing-affordability/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
64. Decker, N.; Galante, C.; Chapple, K.; Martin, A.; Elkind, E. N.; Hanson, M. Right type, right place: assessing the environmental and economic impacts of infill residential development through 2030. Available from: https://ternercenter.berkeley.edu/research-and-policy/right-type-right-place/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
65. International Code Council. Embodied carbon; 2021. Available from: https://www.iccsafe.org/advocacy/embodied-carbon/ [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
66. City of Austin. Austin climate equity plan; 2021. Available from: https://www.austintexas.gov/climate/austin-climate-equity-plan [Last accessed on 22 Oct 2026].
