REFERENCES

1. Tagomori, I. S.; Diuana, F. A.; Baptista, L. B.; et al. Promising climate progress from net-zero ambitions to the Paris Agreement goal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2026, 16, 550-7.

2. Barthelmie, R. J.; Pryor, S. C. Climate change mitigation potential of wind energy. Climate 2021, 9, 136.

3. GWEC. Global Wind Report 2026. 2026. https://www.gwec.net/reports/globalwindreport (accessed 2026-8-28).

4. Wang, J.; Chen, L.; Tan, Z.; et al. Inherent spatiotemporal uncertainty of renewable power in China. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5379.

5. Ruan, Z.; Lu, X.; Yin, Z.; et al. Spatiotemporal carbon footprint and associated costs of wind power toward China's carbon neutrality. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2024, 205, 107593.

6. Chen, S.; Lu, X.; Nielsen, C. P.; et al. Deploying solar photovoltaic energy first in carbon-intensive regions brings gigatons more carbon mitigations to 2060. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2023, 4, 1006.

7. Schleisner, L. Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities. Renew. Energy. 2000, 20, 279-88.

8. Tremeac, B.; Meunier, F. Life cycle analysis of 4.5MW and 250W wind turbines. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2009, 13, 2104-10.

9. Crawford, R. Life cycle energy and greenhouse emissions analysis of wind turbines and the effect of size on energy yield. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2009, 13, 2653-60.

10. Raadal, H. L.; Vold, B. I.; Myhr, A.; Nygaard, T. A. GHG emissions and energy performance of offshore wind power. Renew. Energy. 2014, 66, 314-24.

11. Vargas, A.; Zenón, E.; Oswald, U.; Islas, J.; Güereca, L.; Manzini, F. Life cycle assessment: a case study of two wind turbines used in Mexico. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2015, 75, 1210-6.

12. Schreiber, A.; Marx, J.; Zapp, P. Comparative life cycle assessment of electricity generation by different wind turbine types. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 233, 561-72.

13. Chen, G.; Yang, Q.; Zhao, Y. Renewability of wind power in China: a case study of nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emission by a plant in Guangxi. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2011, 15, 2322-9.

14. Yang, J.; Chen, B. Integrated evaluation of embodied energy, greenhouse gas emission and economic performance of a typical wind farm in China. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2013, 27, 559-68.

15. Turconi, R.; Boldrin, A.; Astrup, T. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: overview, comparability and limitations. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2013, 28, 555-65.

16. Xu, K.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, S.; et al. Land use impacts the environmental benefits of wind energy farms in China. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2025, 6, 2833.

17. Xu, K.; Chang, J.; Zhou, W.; et al. A comprehensive estimate of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from onshore wind energy in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 338, 130683.

18. Faizan, M.; Afgan, I. Life cycle assessment of wind turbine systems: A statistical synthesis approach to address greenhouse gas emissions. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2026, 226, 116429.

19. Arvesen, A.; Hertwich, E. G. Assessing the life cycle environmental impacts of wind power: A review of present knowledge and research needs. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2012, 16, 5994-6006.

20. Mendecka, B.; Lombardi, L. Life cycle environmental impacts of wind energy technologies: A review of simplified models and harmonization of the results. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2019, 111, 462-80.

21. Wang, Y.; Sun, T. Life cycle assessment of CO₂ emissions from wind power plants: Methodology and case studies. Renew. Energy. 2012, 43, 30-6.

22. Long, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H. Wind energy expansion in China produces substantial CO₂ reductions and climate benefits. GeoSus 2026, 7, 100489.

23. Sahu, B. K. Wind energy developments and policies in China: a short review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018, 81, 1393-405.

24. Global Wind Energy Council BCG. Mission Critical: Building the Global Wind Energy Supply Chain for a 1.5 °C World. 2023. 05 December 2023. https://www.windtech-international.com/industry-news/mission-critical-building-the-global-wind-energy-supply-chain-for-a-1-5-c-world (accessed 2026-8-28).

25. Ramseur, J. L. Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA): Provisions Related to Climate Change. 2023. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/R/PDF/R47262/R47262.3.pdf (accessed 2026-8-28).

26. Union EPaCotE. Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a carbon border adjustment mechanism. 2023. PE/7/2023/REV/1. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/956/oj (accessed 2026-8-28).

27. Arvesen, A.; Hertwich, E. G. Environmental implications of large-scale adoption of wind power: a scenario-based life cycle assessment. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 045102.

28. Way, R.; Ives, M. C.; Mealy, P.; Farmer, J. D. Empirically grounded technology forecasts and the energy transition. Joule 2022, 6, 2057-82.

29. Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Tanaka, K.; et al. Global spatiotemporal optimization of photovoltaic and wind power to achieve the Paris Agreement targets. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2127.

30. Helveston, J. P.; He, G.; Davidson, M. R. Quantifying the cost savings of global solar photovoltaic supply chains. Nature 2022, 612, 83-7.

31. Sherman, P.; Chen, X.; McElroy, M. B. Wind-generated electricity in China: decreasing potential, inter-annual variability and association with changing climate. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16294.

32. Hertwich, E. G.; Gibon, T.; Bouman, E. A.; et al. Integrated life-cycle assessment of electricity-supply scenarios confirms global environmental benefit of low-carbon technologies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015, 112, 6277-82.

33. Standardization IOf. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Framework. ISO 14040:2006. International Organization for Standardization. 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html (accessed 2026-8-28).

34. Standardization IOf. International Organization for Standardization. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment: Requirements and Guidelines. ISO 14044:2006. 2006. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html (accessed 2026-8-28).

35. Zimmermann, T.; Rehberger, M.; Gößling-Reisemann, S. Material flows resulting from large scale deployment of wind energy in Germany. Resources 2013, 2, 303-34.

36. Yang, D.; Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Ding, N. Carbon footprint of wind turbine by life cycle assessment. Huanjing. Kexue. Xuebao/Acta. Scientiae. Circumstantiae. 2015, 35, 927-34.

37. Razdan, P.; Garrett, P. Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V117-4.2 MW Wind Plant. 2019. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28).

38. Razdan, P.; Garrett, P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V100-2.0 MW Wind Plant. 2018. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28).

39. Razdan, P.; Garrett, P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V90-3.0 MW Wind Plant. 2013. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28).

40. Razdan, P.; Garrett, P. Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production from an Onshore V150-6.0 MW Wind Plant. 2023. https://www.vestas.com/en/sustainability/environment/lifecycle-assessments (accessed 2026-8-28).

41. Institute, J. G. C. R. GCAM regional definitions. Joint Global Change Research Institute. https://jgcri.github.io/gcambreakout/articles/regional.html (accessed 2026-8-28).

42. AG t. Data from: GaBi Professional Database. 2023. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany. https://www.gabi-software.com/software/gabi-professional/ (accessed 2026-8-28).

43. Wernet, G.; Bauer, C.; Steubing, B.; Reinhard, J.; Moreno-Ruiz, E.; Weidema, B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2016, 21, 1218-30.

44. Ember. Data from: Lifecycle carbon intensity of electricity generation. 2025. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/carbon-intensity-electricity (accessed 2026-8-28).

45. Enerdata. CO2 intensity of electricity generation trend over 2000-2050: EnerBlue scenario. 2024. https://eneroutlook.enerdata.net/forecast-world-co2-intensity-of-electricity-generation.html (accessed 2026-8-28).

46. Li, J.; Peng, K.; Wang, P.; et al. Critical rare-earth elements mismatch global wind-power ambitions. One. Earth. 2020, 3, 116-25.

47. Woo, S. Modern definitions in reliability engineering. In: Reliability design of mechanical systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017, pp 35-59.

48. GAC. China Customs Statistics Database. 2026. General Administration of Customs of the People's Republic of China. http://stats.customs.gov.cn (accessed 2026-8-28).

49. Eurostat. Data from: International trade in goods database. 2026. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed 2026-8-28).

50. Bureau, U. C. Data from: USA Trade Online Data Tool. 2026. https://usatrade.census.gov/ (accessed 2026-8-28).

51. Canada Go. Data from: Canada Trade Data Online. 2026. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/app/ixb/tdo/crtr.html (accessed 2026-8-28).

52. IEA. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. 2021.

53. IRENA. Global Renewables Outlook: Energy transformation 2050. 2020. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020 (accessed 2026-8-28).

54. Zhang, Z.; Zhu, Z.; Lu, X.; Zhang, D.; Davidson, M. R. Ratcheting up wind and solar targets for decarbonizing the power sector in China and beyond. Cell. Rep. Sustain. 2025, 2, 100389.

55. Jacobson, M. Z.; von, Krauland. A.; Coughlin, S. J.; et al. Low-cost solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy insecurity for 145 countries. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 3343-59.

56. SEA-DISTANCES.ORG. Distances between sea ports. SEA-DISTANCES.ORG. 2026. https://sea-distances.org/ (accessed 2026-8-28).

57. Luderer, G.; Madeddu, S.; Merfort, L.; et al. Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios. Nat. Energy. 2022, 7, 32-42.

58. Ahmed, S. D.; Al-Ismail, F. S. M.; Shafiullah, M.; Al-Sulaiman, F. A.; El-Amin, I. M. Grid integration challenges of wind energy: a review. IEEE. Access. 2020, 8, 10857-78.

59. Lu, K.; Hong, C.; Lian, J.; Cheng, F. A review of synergies between advanced grid integration strategies and carbon market for wind energy development. Energies 2025, 18, 590.

60. Meier, J.; Lehmann, P.; Süssmuth, B.; Wedekind, S. Wind power deployment and the impact of spatial planning policies. Environ. Resource. Econ. 2024, 87, 491-550.

61. IRENA. World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5 °C Pathway. 2023. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jun/World-Energy-Transitions-Outlook-2023 (accessed 2026-8-28).

62. Borgonovo, E.; Plischke, E. Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances. Eur. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2016, 248, 869-87.

63. Lu, X.; McElroy, M. B.; Kiviluoma, J. Global potential for wind-generated electricity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 10933-8.

64. Pryor, S. C.; Barthelmie, R. J.; Bukovsky, M. S.; Leung, L. R.; Sakaguchi, K. Climate change impacts on wind power generation. Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ. 2020, 1, 627-43.

65. IPCC. Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2022. https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/ (accessed 2026-8-28).

66. York, R. Do alternative energy sources displace fossil fuels? Nature. Clim. Change. 2012, 2, 441-3.

67. Oh, S. Y.; Joung, C.; Lee, S.; et al. Condition-based maintenance of wind turbine structures: a state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2024, 204, 114799.

68. Zhao, Y.; Wu, L.; Shi, B.; Zhang, H.; Miao, C. The influencing factors and scenario simulation of embodied carbon emissions in manufacturing trade in the Yellow River Basin: an analysis from the perspective of technological effects. Energy 2026, 342, 139619.

69. Hoehnke, H.; Wussow, M.; Zanocco, C.; Carley, S.; Konisky, D.; Neumann, D. Structural barriers and policy pathways for a just clean energy transition. Nat. Rev. Clean. Technol. 2026, 2, 327-47.

70. Frilingou, N.; Van, de. Ven. D. J.; Sampedro, J.; et al. Regional impacts on decarbonisation under evolving financing conditions for energy technologies. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17.

71. Hernández C, Serrano González J, Fernández-Blanco R. New method to assess the long-term role of wind energy generation in reduction of CO₂ emissions - case study of the European Union. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 1099-111.

72. Tang, R.; Yu, D.; Li, Y.; et al. Accelerating the global energy transition through carbon pricing: an ex-post analysis of emissions reduction effects and mechanisms based on international data. ENG. Manag. 2026, 13, 404-22.

73. Child, M.; Kemfert, C.; Bogdanov, D.; Breyer, C. Flexible electricity generation, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. Renew. Energy. 2019, 139, 80-101.

74. Brown, T.; Schlachtberger, D.; Kies, A.; Schramm, S.; Greiner, M. Synergies of sector coupling and transmission reinforcement in a cost-optimised, highly renewable European energy system. Energy 2018, 160, 720-39.

75. Zhao, Y.; Wang, M.; Sun, B.; Zhang, H.; Li, X. Assessing the dynamic interplay of policy, economic, and technological factors for sustainable recycling of decommissioned wind turbine blades in China: a system dynamics approach. Waste. Manag. 2026, 209, 115199.

76. Pehl, M.; Arvesen, A.; Humpenöder, F.; Popp, A.; Hertwich, E. G.; Luderer, G. Understanding future emissions from low-carbon power systems by integration of life-cycle assessment and integrated energy modelling. Nat. Energy. 2017, 2, 939-45.

77. IEA. The state of clean technology manufacturing: energy technology perspectives special briefing. 2023. https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/0a421001-6157-436d-893c-c37eeab54967/TheStateofCleanTechnologyManufacturing.pdf (accessed 2026-8-28).

78. Mckenna, R.; Lilliestam, J.; Heinrichs, H. U.; et al. System impacts of wind energy developments: key research challenges and opportunities. Joule 2025, 9, 101799.

79. Yan, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Han, S.; Shang, W.; Liu, Y. Wind power forecasting based on large time series model. Engineering 2025.

80. Li, J.; Li, S.; Wu, F. Research on carbon emission reduction benefit of wind power project based on life cycle assessment theory. Renew. Energy. 2020, 155, 456-68.