REFERENCES

1. Friede, G.; Busch, T.; Bassen, A. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Finance. Invest. 2015, 5, 210-33.

2. Luo, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhou, J. Is green contagious? -Local peer effects of corporate green investment. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance. 2025, 104, 104650.

3. Ali-rind, A.; Boubaker, S.; Jarjir, S. L. Peer effects in financial economics: a literature survey. Res. Int. Bus. Finance. 2023, 64, 101873.

4. Tao, F.; Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, P. Digital transformation, resilience of industrial chain and supply chain, and enterprise productivity. China. Ind. Econ. 2023, 5, 118-36.

5. Dong, Y.; Li, D.; Ma, P.; Choi, Y. Investee peer effect on firm Innovation: an uncertainty-reduction perspective. Technovation 2025, 146, 103291.

6. Sun, P.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, D. Peer effect of OFDI decision-making on corporate trade networks. J. World. Econ. 2022, 45, 58-83.

7. Lian, Y.; Ye, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L. How does corporate ESG performance affect bond credit spreads: empirical evidence from China. Int. Rev. Econ. Finance. 2023, 85, 352-71.

8. Yan, R.; Jiang, X. Customer enterprises’ ESG rating and supplier enterprises’ green innovation. Syst. Eng. Theory. Pract. 2025, 45, 1168-88.

9. Li, Q.; Wang, R.; Shi, Z. Spillover effect of “chain master” firms’ ESG performance. J. Zhongnan. Univ. Econ. Law. 2024, 5, 138-49.

10. Li, J.; Lian, G.; Xu, A. How do ESG affect the spillover of green innovation among peer firms? Mechanism discussion and performance study. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 158, 113648.

11. Li, Z.; Li, Z. Research on peer effect of enterprise ESG information disclosure. Nankai. Bus. Rev. 2023, 26, 126-38. https://nbr.nankai.edu.cn/nkglpl/article/abstract/220922006?utm_source (accessed 2025-11-17).

12. Tian, J.; Li, T.; Yang, X. Environmental regulation intensity and ESG rating quality. Rev. Econ. Manag. 2024, 40, 58-69.

13. Chen, Y.; Liu, D.; He, H.; Li, L. Peer effects of ESG greenwashing within board networks. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2025, 106, 104540.

14. Yuan, P.; Ren, Y.; Dong, X. Mentors and benefactors: regional peer effects on corporate ESG performance. J. Chongqing. Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed). 2025, 31, 76-95.

15. Xie, X.; Luo, D.; Gao, Y. Collaborative mechanism of supply chain enterprises based on green innovation: an empirical study. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 2019, 33, 116-24.

16. Yu, Y.; Choi, Y. Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption: the mediating role of organizational culture for Chinese companies. Soc. Sci. J. 2016, 53, 226-34.

17. Yan, B.; Cheng, M.; Wang, N. ESG green spillover, supply chain transmission and corporate green innovation. Econ. Res. J. 2024, 7, 74-93. https://kns.cnki.net/nzkhtml/xmlRead/trialRead.html?dbCode=CJFD&tableName=CJFDTOTAL&fileName=JJYJ202407005&fileSourceType=1&appId=KNS_BASIC_PSMC&invoice=MyFGS/b/Zhq0j4pDj9Y9DT4PLD/2hXgfHKv0g6976igQtOoayr6iS4nCb3C/ixW3BpnpveQjMrJ3tsATvBC51YoZQzlkUO5YDViPGP62gGR8YuABmMu+L0PW8YuIOdyzcn23pLEA9vy/jqpnG8FQyhqbOMERZagwOgeuzl2Fze8= (accessed 2025-11-18).

18. Yuan, Q.; Peng, T.; Liang, J. Collaborative equity networks in the supply chain and peer effects on corporate green transition. Fin. Res. Lett. 2025, 73, 106548.

19. Schiller, C. Global supply-chain networks and corporate social responsibility. In 13th Annual Mid-Atlantic Research Conference in Finance (MARC) Paper, SSRN.

20. Dai, R.; Liang, H.; Ng, L. Socially responsible corporate customers. J. Financ. Econ. 2021, 142, 598-626.

21. Tang, J.; Wang, X.; Liu, Q. The spillover effect of customers’ ESG to suppliers. Pac. Basin. Financ. J. 2023, 78, 101947.

22. Zhang, H.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ni, J. Peer effects in corporate financialization: the role of Fintech in financial decision making. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 94, 103267.

23. Leary, M. T.; Roberts, M. R. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? J. Finance. 2014, 69, 139-78.

24. Wang, P.; Xue, W.; Li, Z. How does peer firms’ ESG performance affect carbon emission reductions? Fin. Res. Lett. 2025, 83, 107711.

25. Liang, Z.; Yang, X. The impact of green finance on the peer effect of corporate ESG information disclosure. Fin. Res. Lett. 2024, 62, 105080.

26. Lu, R.; Wang, C.; Deng, M. “Peer effect” in capital structure of China’s listed firms. Bus. Manag. J. 2017, 39, 181-94.

27. Hu, J.; Yu, X.; Han, Y. Can ESG rating promote green transformation of enterprises? J. Quant. Technol. Econ. 2023, 40, 90-111.

28. Li, J. Research on ESG risk premium and excess returns in China’s a-share market. Secur. Mark. Herald. 2021, 6, 26-35. https://kns.cnki.net/nzkhtml/xmlRead/trialRead.html?dbCode=CJFD&tableName=CJFDTOTAL&fileName=ZQDB202106003&fileSourceType=1&appId=KNS_BASIC_PSMC&invoice=KQbrtWOsV/iTbLPOFSMe2xFlEgZpXQoitNhBVq/taJtCfmXkWrBY4tnPSGyHsspttxj6I9AA2gQQ87hYv+MLq6IYwdoioi8I5jtdc71C+jJwYEyy0Z6Ao5Qww/VwlSp8WjyNVoA35nGxDsEP6mPweRumszBkrZsPFDsyYBJyrNo= (accessed 2025-11-18).

29. Gao, Y.; Liu, S.; Yang, L. The dynamics of peer influence in corporate ESG practices. Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2025, 103, 104186.

30. Khoo, J.; Cheung, A. K. Firms’ organisation capital: do peers matter? Int. Rev. Financ. Anal. 2024, 96, 103619.

31. Ding, Q.; Huang, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, D. ESG peer effects and corporate financial distress: an executive social network perspective. Int. J. Fin. Econ. 2025, 30, 2284-310.

32. Zheng, H.; Shi, X.; Deng, X. A study on the industry peer effects in enterprise digital transformation. Contemp. Financ. Econ. 2025, 3, 98-111.

33. Lin, Z.; Wei, W. Does ESG performance contribute to reducing customer concentration? J. Anhui. Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci. Ed). 2023, 47, 121-32.

34. Li, Y.; Wu, Y.; Tian, X. Enterprise ESG performance and supply chain discourse power. J. Financ. Econ. 2023, 49, 153-68.

35. Ding, Q.; Huang, J.; Chen, J. Does digital finance matter for corporate green investment? Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China. Energy. Econ. , 2023,117,106476.

36. Ma, D.; Wang, M.; Zeng, B.; Jiang, H. Peer effects of firm environmental protection expenditures. Fin. Res. Lett. 2024, 65, 105493.

37. Li, Y.; Niu, H.; Xu, H. Those who are close to vermilion are red: can customers included in the carbon emissions trading pilot affect corporate ESG performance? R&D. Manag. 2024, 36, 40-52.

38. Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, M.; Li, X.; Cui, G.; Li, H. Research on green governance and its evaluation of Chinese listed companies. J. Manag. World. 2019, 35, 126-133+160.

39. Xiao, R.; Ma, B.; Qian, L.; Shen, J. Impact of the low-carbon city pilot policy on corporate green innovation and its mechanisms. China. Popul. Resour. Environ. 2023, 5, 127-39. https://kns.cnki.net/nzkhtml/xmlRead/trialRead.html?dbCode=CJFD&tableName=CJFDTOTAL&fileName=ZGRZ202305011&fileSourceType=1&appId=KNS_BASIC_PSMC&invoice=vxDM5WtST1wuhqHIlKOPnqCCslNSTYHTrOx7XActBURWG8B/I3Bz0/HOaOfJTuB3BzBR74/7oPyo9MRTMIshfpb4TSL0D3QCqsO8HD/jwwSI8tHdT5+vSJ9SmvdOHfWCc0Z9BJm1RPtHBCBSQpT5bCc49h7WSVLnzl3TV2eaWvY= (accessed 2025-11-18).

40. Ren, X.; Zeng, G.; Sun, X. The peer effect of digital transformation and corporate environmental performance: empirical evidence from listed companies in China. Econ. Model. 2023, 128, 106515.

41. Adhikari, B. K.; Agrawal, A. Peer influence on payout policies. J. Corp. Finance. 2018, 48, 615-37.

42. Jiang, T. Mediating Effects and Moderating Effects in Causal Inference. China. Ind. Econ. 2022, 5, 100-20.

43. Lu, X.; Hu, Y. Digital peer effects and the resilience of industrial and supply chains. Ind. Econ. Res. 2024, 5, 44-6.