REFERENCES
1. Li GQ, Zhang T, Yang WG, et al. Gut microbiota patterns associated with somatostatin in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective study. Cell Death Discov 2020;6:94.
2. Cao Y, Gu HY, Huang ZD, et al. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative recovery for pancreaticoduodenectomy: pooled analysis of observational study. Front Oncol 2019;9:687.
3. Li X, Lu Y, Chen C, et al. Development and validation of a patient-specific model to predict postoperative SIRS in older patients: a two-center study. Front Public Health 2023;11:1145013.
4. Caban M, Małecka-Wojciesko E. Gaps and opportunities in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Cancers 2023;15:5577.
5. Cutolo C, Izzo F, Valeriani M, Belli A. Is robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) a valid alternative to open pancreaticoduodenectomy? Mini-invasive Surg 2025;9:40.
6. Shannon A, Bath NM, Ejaz A. A narrative review of the history and recent advances in minimally invasive pancreatic resection. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:32.
7. Liu Y, Yun H, Zhang W, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Int J Surg 2025;111:6397-411.
8. Zhang L, Shi F, Hu C, et al. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer: a retrospective study at two institutions. Surg Endosc 2023;37:4403-13.
9. Abdelmaseeh M, Mhmndar A, Siddiqa A, et al. Minimally invasive approaches for high-risk and elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic review of techniques and outcomes. Cureus 2025;17:e78271.
10. Ballarin R, Esposito G, Guerrini GP, et al. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly versus younger patients: a meta-analysis. Cancers 2024;16:323.
11. Wang J, Xu L, Huang S, Hui Q, Shi X, Zhang Q. Low muscle mass and Charlson comorbidity index are risk factors for short-term postoperative prognosis of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2021;21:730.
12. Bhattacharjee HK, Kaviyarasan MP, Singh KJ, et al. Age adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (a-CCI) AS a tool to predict 30-day post-operative outcome in general surgery patients. ANZ J Surg 2023;93:132-8.
13. Yamashita Y, Baudo M, Sicouri S, et al. Effect of elevated body mass index on outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Anatol J Cardiol 2024;28:565-74.
14. Sun Y, Xu Z, Tang Y, et al. Unveiling the impact of body mass index on surgical difficulty and oncological prognosis in low rectal cancer: post-hoc analysis of the LASRE trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2025;40:185.
15. Kowshik V, Velkumary S, Sethi P, Feula JM, Subhashri S, Abirami M. Association of handgrip strength and endurance with body composition in head and neck cancer patients. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:910-6.
16. Wang HB, Xiong GB, Zhu F, et al. [Clavien-Dindo classification and influencing factors analysis of complications after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2018;56:828-32.
17. Pulvirenti A, Ramera M, Bassi C. Modifications in the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2:107.
18. Hendrix JM, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
19. Lee B, Yoon YS, Kang CM, et al. Fistula risk score-adjusted comparison of postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2021;28:1089-97.
20. Salam B, Nowak S, Theis M, et al. Associations between cardiac adipose tissue and abdominal visceral fat and muscle based on computed tomography area and density. Sci Rep 2025;15:20192.
21. Sok C, Sandhu S, Shah H, et al. Simple preoperative imaging measurements predict postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2024;31:1898-905.
22. Omichi K, Hasegawa K, Kumamaru H, et al. Association between age and short-term outcomes of gastroenterological surgeries in older patients: an analysis using the National Clinical Database in Japan. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021;406:2827-36.
23. Ikenaga N, Nakata K, Abe T, et al. Risks and benefits of pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients aged 80 years and over. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023;408:108.
24. Cheng H, Clymer JW, Chen BPH, et al. Prolonged operative duration is associated with complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2018;229:134-44.
25. Cullinane C, Fullard A, Croghan SM, Elliott JA, Fleming CA. Effect of obesity on perioperative outcomes following gastrointestinal surgery: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2023;7:zrad026.
26. Qi F, Wang B, Fei F, et al. Impact of pneumoperitoneum pressure on cardiac output in laparoscopic surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 2025;25:317.
27. Li G, Zhang C, Lu T, et al. Spatial multi-omics analyses reveal diabetes promotes pancreatic cancer progression by stimulating cholesterol-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Cancer Res 2026.
28. Liu X, Xue K, Zhang Y, Tian B. Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts postoperative outcomes in elderly patients with pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. Gland Surg 2025;14:807-17.
29. Caleyachetty R, Barber TM, Mohammed NI, et al. Ethnicity-specific BMI cutoffs for obesity based on type 2 diabetes risk in England: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2021;9:419-26.
