fig2

Comparison of k-mer-based <i>de novo</i> comparative metagenomic tools and approaches

Figure 2. Impact of Sequencing technology, sequencing depth and k-mer length on the correlation between expected taxonomic and k-mer-based beta-diversity metric. (A) Spearman correlations between the expected taxonomic and k-mer-based Bray-Curtis distance using the HiSeq sequencing error model; (B) Expected taxonomic against the k-mer-based Bray-Curtis distances (k = 30bp) obtained for a simulated dataset of 100 metagenomes simulated at a sequencing depth of 5 million paired reads using the HiSeq sequencing error model; (C) Spearman correlations between the expected taxonomic and k-mer-based presence/absence Jaccard distance using the HiSeq sequencing error model; (D) Expected taxonomic against the k-mer-based presence/absence Jaccard distances (k = 30bp) obtained for a simulated dataset of 100 metagenomes simulated at a sequencing depth of 5 million paired-reads using the HiSeq sequencing error model.

Microbiome Research Reports
ISSN 2771-5965 (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/