REFERENCES
1. He, Y.; Guan, B.; Zhuang, Z.; et al. Advances in ammonia (NH3) adsorption and storage: materials, mechanisms, and applications. Adsorption 2025, 31, 48.
2. Hassan, Q.; Algburi, S.; Sameen, A. Z.; Jaszczur, M.; Salman, H. M. Hydrogen as an energy carrier: properties, storage methods, challenges, and future implications. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2023, 44, 327-50.
3. Marakatti, V. S.; Gaigneaux, E. M. Recent advances in heterogeneous catalysis for ammonia synthesis. ChemCatChem 2020, 12, 5838-57.
4. Lim, J.; Fernández, C. A.; Lee, S. W.; Hatzell, M. C. Ammonia and nitric acid demands for fertilizer use in 2050. ACS. Energy. Lett. 2021, 6, 3676-85.
5. Macfarlane, D. R.; Cherepanov, P. V.; Choi, J.; et al. A roadmap to the ammonia economy. Joule 2020, 4, 1186-205.
6. Ma, Y.; Lan, G.; Fu, W.; et al. Role of surface defects of carbon nanotubes on catalytic performance of barium promoted ruthenium catalyst for ammonia synthesis. J. Energy. Chem. 2020, 41, 79-86.
7. Singh, S.; Mohammed, A. K.; Alhammadi, A. A.; Shetty, D.; Polychronopoulou, K. Hypes and hopes on the materials development strategies to produce ammonia at mild conditions. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2023, 48, 34700-39.
8. Othman, A.; Gowda, A.; Andreescu, D.; et al. Two decades of ceria nanoparticle research: structure, properties and emerging applications. Mater. Horiz. 2024, 11, 3213-66.
9. Liu, H.; Zhang, R.; Liu, S.; Liu, G. CeO2/Ni inverse catalyst as a highly active and stable Ru-free catalyst for ammonia decomposition. ACS. Catal. 2024, 14, 9927-39.
10. Teng, B.; Ma, C.; Chen, J.; et al. Ru dispersed on oxygen-defect-rich CeO2 nanorods for ammonia decomposition. ACS. Appl. Nano. Mater. 2024, 7, 15012-24.
11. Zhu, X.; Liu, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Redox CeO2 substituted Na2WO4-Mn catalyst for high-throughput chemical looping oxidative coupling of methane. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. Energy. 2025, 367, 125108.
12. Liu, B.; Pan, Y.; Han, Z.; et al. Interplay of structural properties and redox behavior in CeO2 nanoparticles: impact on reactivity and bioavailability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 4641-51.
13. Parastaev, A.; Muravev, V.; Huertas, Osta. E.; et al. Boosting CO2 hydrogenation via size-dependent metal-support interactions in cobalt/ceria-based catalysts. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 526-33.
14. Buhori, A.; Choi, J.; Lee, H.; et al. Effect of CeO2 morphology and Ru impregnation method on CH4 selectivity reduction in polyethylene waste conversion to liquid fuels and lubricants. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 499, 156097.
15. Wei, J.; Sun, Y.; Ma, Y.; et al. Tailored metal-oxygen defect engineering to modulate catalytic interaction of ultra-low Ru supported morphology-oriented CeO2 for hydrogenolysis of lignin-derived phenols. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 509, 161199.
16. Yamazaki, K.; Goto, Y.; Kikugawa, M.; et al. Effect of support morphology on the ammonia synthesis activity of Ru/CeO2-based catalysts. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 94, 406-19.
17. Xie, B.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, X.; et al. Morphology effect of cerium dioxide on the catalytic performance of Ru/CeO2 catalyst for the oxidation of different CVOCs. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 345, 127428.
18. Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Shi, L.; et al. Morphological effects of cerium oxide on photothermal synergistic catalytic degradation of toluene. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2026, 380, 135271.
19. Ma, Z.; Zhao, S.; Pei, X.; Xiong, X.; Hu, B. New insights into the support morphology-dependent ammonia synthesis activity of Ru/CeO2 catalysts. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 191-9.
20. Li, W. Q.; Xu, M.; Chen, J. S.; Ye, T. N. Enabling sustainable ammonia synthesis: from nitrogen activation strategies to emerging materials. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2408434.
21. Zhang, L.; Zhou, M.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T. Selective Hydrogenation over supported metal catalysts: from nanoparticles to single atoms. Chem. Rev. 2019, 120, 683-733.
22. Sarma, B. B.; Kim, J.; Amsler, J.; et al. One‐pot cooperation of single‐atom Rh and Ru Solid catalysts for a selective tandem olefin isomerization‐hydrosilylation process. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 5806-15.
23. Ansari, M. Z.; Habib, F.; Gupta, J.; et al. Frontiers in metal-organic frameworks: innovative nanomaterials for next-generation supercapacitors. Adv. Compos. Hybrid. Mater. 2024, 7, 215.
24. Zulfiqar, A.; Miao, B.; Khan, F.; et al. Metal-organic framework (MOF)-based catalysts for sustainable energy technologies: a review. Langmuir 2025, 41, 24049-77.
25. Sousa, A.; Rendon, Patino. A.; Garzon, Tovar. L.; Mateo, D.; Gascon, J.; Bavykina, A. Ammonia decomposition via MOF‐derived photothermal catalysts. ChemSusChem 2024, 18, e202401896.
26. Wu, W.; Yao, W.; Liu, Y.; Xi, S.; Zhang, T. Efficient hydrogen production from ammonia using Ru nanoparticles on Ce-based metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived CeO2 with oxygen vacancies. Molecules 2025, 30, 2301.
27. Song, Q.; Yin, X.; Zhang, H. Ni‐MOF‐74 derived carbon‐based Ni catalysts for efficient catalytic ammonia synthesis via pulsed DBD plasma. Plasma. Processes. Polym. 2024, 22, 2400173.
28. Li, S.; Wang, N.; Yue, Y.; Wang, G.; Zu, Z.; Zhang, Y. Copper doped ceria porous nanostructures towards a highly efficient bifunctional catalyst for carbon monoxide and nitric oxide elimination. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6, 2495-500.
30. Porta, A.; Falbo, L.; Visconti, C. G.; Lietti, L.; Bassano, C.; Deiana, P. Synthesis of Ru-based catalysts for CO2 methanation and experimental assessment of intraporous transport limitations. Catal. Today. 2020, 343, 38-47.
31. Hussain, J.; Lin, K.; Chowdhury, S.; Hussain, A. Synthesis and characterization of hexagonal ceria-BTC microrods for methanol decomposition. J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng. 2024, 159, 105486.
32. Borges, Serra. A. R.; Castro, De. Sousa. G.; De, Carvalho. Gomes. V.; et al. Enhancing photocatalytic tetracycline degradation through the fabrication of high surface area CeO2 from a cerium-organic framework. RSC. Adv. 2024, 14, 17507-18.
33. Zhao, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, Q.; et al. Effect of rutile content on the catalytic performance of Ru/TiO2 catalyst for low-temperature CO2 methanation. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 14288-96.
34. Li, Y.; Zhang, L. A.; Qin, Y.; et al. Crystallinity dependence of ruthenium nanocatalyst toward hydrogen evolution reaction. ACS. Catal. 2018, 8, 5714-20.
35. Sivan, S. E.; Kang, K. H.; Han, S. J.; et al. Facile MOF-derived one-pot synthetic approach toward Ru single atoms, nanoclusters, and nanoparticles dispersed on CeO2 supports for enhanced ammonia synthesis. J. Catal. 2022, 408, 316-28.
36. Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta. Cryst. A. 1976, 32, 751-67.
37. Sharma, S.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, P.; Mcfarland, E. W.; Metiu, H. CO2 methanation on Ru-doped ceria. J. Catal. 2011, 278, 297-309.
38. Singh, P.; Hegde, M. S. CexRuxO2-δ (x = 0.05, 0.10): a new high oxygen storage material and Pt, Pd-free three-way catalyst. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 3337-45.
39. Carrillo, A. J.; Navarrete, L.; Laqdiem, M.; Balaguer, M.; Serra, J. M. Boosting methane partial oxidation on ceria through exsolution of robust Ru nanoparticles. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 2924-34.
40. Pandit, N. A.; Alshehri, S. M.; Ahmad, T. CeO2/ZrO2 p-n heterojunction nanostructures for efficient NO2 gas sensing. J. Alloys. Compd. 2024, 1004, 175782.
41. Iqbal, M. W.; Yu, Y.; Simakov, D. S. Enhancing the surface area stability of the cerium oxide reverse water gas shift nanocatalyst via reverse microemulsion synthesis. Catal. Today. 2023, 407, 230-43.
42. Kang, W.; Ozgur, D. O.; Varma, A. Solution combustion synthesis of high surface area CeO2 nanopowders for catalytic applications: reaction mechanism and properties. ACS. Appl. Nano. Mater. 2018, 1, 675-85.
43. Zaidi, R.; Khan, S. U.; Farooqi, I. H.; et al. Performance, isotherm, kinetics and mechanism of simultaneous removal of Cr(VI), Cu(II) and F ions by CeO2-MgO binary oxide nanomaterials. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 1431.
44. López-Rodríguez, S.; Davó-Quiñonero, A.; Bailón-García, E.; Lozano-Castelló, D.; Bueno-López, A. Effect of Ru loading on Ru/CeO2 catalysts for CO2 methanation. Mol. Catal. 2021, 515, 111911.
45. Feng, Q.; Zou, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. Influence of surface oxygen vacancies and ruthenium valence state on the catalysis of pyrochlore oxides. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 4520-30.
46. Zhou, S.; Ban, T.; Li, T.; et al. Defect engineering in Ce-based metal-organic frameworks toward enhanced catalytic performance for hydrogenation of dicyclopentadiene. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 38177-87.
47. Giri, G.; Verploegen, E.; Mannsfeld, S. C. B.; et al. Tuning charge transport in solution-sheared organic semiconductors using lattice strain. Nature 2011, 480, 504-8.
48. Dave, M.; Dalela, S.; Kumar, S.; Alvi, P. A. Defect induced structural and Raman study of Nd-doped CeO2 nanomaterials. AIP. Conf. Proc. 2020, 2265, 030108.
49. Bezkrovnyi, O. S.; Kraszkiewicz, P.; Ptak, M.; Kepinski, L. Thermally induced reconstruction of ceria nanocubes into zigzag {111}-nanofacetted structures and its influence on catalytic activity in CO oxidation. Catal. Commun. 2018, 117, 94-8.
50. Angermann, M.; Jakopic, G.; Prietl, C.; Griesser, T.; Reichmann, K.; Deluca, M. Highly conductive RuO2 thin films from novel facile aqueous chemical solution deposition. J. Sol-Gel. Sci. Technol. 2023, 108, 575-87.
51. Yao, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, L.; et al. Investigation of the structure, acidity, and catalytic performance of CuO/Ti0.95Ce0.05O2 catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3 at low temperature. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2014, 150-151, 315-29.
52. Wu, Z.; Li, M.; Howe, J.; Meyer, H. M.; Overbury, S. H. Probing defect sites on CeO2 nanocrystals with well-defined surface planes by Raman spectroscopy and O2 adsorption. Langmuir 2010, 26, 16595-606.
53. Dai, Q.; Huang, H.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Catalysis oxidation of 1,2-dichloroethane and ethyl acetate over ceria nanocrystals with well-defined crystal planes. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2012, 117-8, 360-8.
54. Chen, H. First-principles study of CO adsorption and oxidation on Ru-doped CeO2(111) surface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012, 116, 6239-46.
55. Huang, H.; Dai, Q.; Wang, X. Morphology effect of Ru/CeO2 catalysts for the catalytic combustion of chlorobenzene. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2014, 158-9, 96-105.
56. Zhang, X.; Zheng, J.; Boch, F. J.; Nickl, S.; Köhler, K. Decomposition of N2O by ruthenium catalysts - RuO2 as active phase on non‐reducible supports. ChemCatChem 2024, 16, e202400347.
57. Mi, R.; Li, D.; Hu, Z.; Yang, R. T. Morphology effects of CeO2 nanomaterials on the catalytic combustion of toluene: a combined kinetics and diffuse reflectance infrared fourier transform spectroscopy study. ACS. Catal. 2021, 11, 7876-89.
58. Costa Zonetti P, Landers R, Cobo AJG. Thermal treatment effects on the Ru/CeO2 catalysts performance for partial hydrogenation of benzene. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 6849-53.
59. Kim, H.; Yang, S.; Lim, Y. H.; Lee, J.; Ha, J.; Kim, D. H. Enhancement in the metal efficiency of Ru/TiO2 catalyst for guaiacol hydrogenation via hydrogen spillover in the liquid phase. J. Catal. 2022, 410, 93-102.
60. Li, W.; Liu, P.; Niu, R.; Li, J.; Wang, S. Influence of CeO2 supports prepared with different precipitants over Ru/CeO2 catalysts for ammonia synthesis. Solid. State. Sci. 2020, 99, 105983.
61. Sun, Y.; Xue, Z.; Liu, Q.; et al. Modulating electronic structure of metal-organic frameworks by introducing atomically dispersed Ru for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1369.
62. Villarroel-rocha, J.; Gil, A. Modeling the temperature-programmed reduction of metal oxide catalysts by considering the particle-size distribution effect. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 487, 150722.
63. Unutulmazsoy, Y.; Cancellieri, C.; Lin, L.; Jeurgens, L. P. Reduction of thermally grown single-phase CuO and Cu2O thin films by in-situ time-resolved XRD. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 588, 152896.
64. Chen, J.; Ni, J.; Xu, H.; He, G.; Chen, H. Mechanism and research progress of hydrogen spillover in hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Alloys. Compd. 2024, 1004, 175883.
65. Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Ryoo, R.; Park, J. Y.; Choi, M. Hydrogen spillover in nonreducible oxides: mechanism and catalytic utilization. Nano. Res. 2022, 15, 10357-65.
66. Li, Y.; Li, L.; Xu, S.; et al. Hydrogen spillover mechanism at the metal-metal interface in electrocatalytic hydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202407810.
67. Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, K.; et al. Plasma-assisted ammonia synthesis over La2O3 modified by RF discharge: effect of oxygen vacancies on N2 adsorption and associative mechanism. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 11728-38.
68. Luo, S.; Liu, Y.; Guo, L.; et al. Plasma-derived hydrogen radical-mediated N2 activation for mild ammonia synthesis: insights into the importance of oxygen vacancies in the reaction mechanism. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025, 13, 30546-53.
69. Zhu, H.; Wang, C.; He, Y.; et al. Oxygen vacancies engineering in electrocatalysts nitrogen reduction reaction. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 1039738.
70. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Ruan, Q.; Tang, J. Ru and RuOx decorated carbon nitride for efficient ammonia photosynthesis. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 12329-35.
71. Polychronopoulou, K.; Alkhoori, S.; Albedwawi, S.; et al. Decoupling the chemical and mechanical strain effect on steering the CO2 activation over CeO2-based oxides: an experimental and DFT approach. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2022, 14, 33094-119.
72. Jiang, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; et al. Tuning oxidant and antioxidant activities of ceria by anchoring copper single-site for antibacterial application. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1010.
73. Siakavelas, G.; Charisiou, N.; Alkhoori, S.; et al. Highly selective and stable nickel catalysts supported on ceria promoted with Sm2O3, Pr2O3 and MgO for the CO2 methanation reaction. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2021, 282, 119562.
74. Isaacs, M. A.; Drivas, C.; Lee, R.; Palgrave, R.; Parlett, C. M.; Morgan, D. J. XPS surface analysis of ceria-based materials: experimental methods and considerations. Appl. Surface. Sci. Adv. 2023, 18, 100469.
75. Elmutasim, O.; Hussien, A. G.; Sharan, A.; et al. Evolution of oxygen vacancy sites in ceria-based high-entropy oxides and their role in N2 activation. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, acsami.3c16521.
76. Xie, C.; Yan, D.; Li, H.; et al. Defect chemistry in heterogeneous catalysis: recognition, understanding, and utilization. ACS. Catal. 2020, 10, 11082-98.
77. Peera, S. G.; Kim, S. W. Rare earth Ce/CeO2 Electrocatalysts: role of high electronic spin state of Ce and Ce3+/Ce4+ redox couple on oxygen reduction reaction. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 600.
78. Kumar, A.; Lee, J.; Kim, M. G.; et al. Efficient nitrate conversion to ammonia on f-block single-atom/metal oxide heterostructure via local electron-deficiency modulation. ACS. Nano. 2022, 16, 15297-309.
79. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Feng, J.; et al. Unraveling the physical chemistry and materials science of CeO2-based nanostructures. Chem 2021, 7, 2022-59.
80. Kang, L.; Wang, B.; Bing, Q.; et al. Adsorption and activation of molecular oxygen over atomic copper(I/II) site on ceria. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4008.
81. Yang, X.; Han, R.; Shi, L.; et al. Dual-site engineering of La/Ti co-doped BiFeO3 for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic degradation: synergistic effects and high stability. J. Alloys. Compd. 2025, 1039, 183239.
82. Yu, W.; Wang, W.; Li, S.; et al. Construction of active site in a sintered copper-ceria nanorod catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 17548-57.
83. Yan, H.; Yang, C.; Shao, W.; et al. Construction of stabilized bulk-nano interfaces for highly promoted inverse CeO2/Cu catalyst. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3470.
84. Li, H.; Wang, H.; Gong, X.; et al. Multiple configurations of the two excess 4f electrons on defective CeO2(111): origin and implications. Phys. Rev. B. 2009, 79, 193401.
85. Holgado, J.; Munuera, G.; Espinós, J.; González-Elipe, A. XPS study of oxidation processes of CeOx defective layers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2000, 158, 164-71.
86. Han, Z.; Liu, W.; Gao, Y. Advancing the understanding of oxygen vacancies in ceria: insights into their formation, behavior, and catalytic roles. JACS. Au. 2025, 5, 1549-69.
87. Feng, Z.; Guo, F.; Zhang, Y.; Ichikawa, T.; Zheng, J. Oxygen vacancies rich CeO2 supported Ru catalyst for efficient hydrogenation of N-ethylcarbazole at mild temperature. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. Energy. 2025, 366, 125059.
88. Lu, X.; Zhang, R.; Liu, Y.; et al. Oxygen vacancies and lattice distortion synergistically enhanced piezocatalysis of CaZn2(BO3)2 for nonantibiotic pharmaceutical degradation. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 63692-702.
89. Chou, M. Y.; Chelikowsky, J. R. Structural properties of the Ru(0001) surface. Phys. Rev. B. 1987, 35, 2124-7.
90. Lin, B.; Liu, Y.; Heng, L.; et al. Morphology effect of ceria on the catalytic performances of Ru/CeO2 catalysts for ammonia synthesis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 9127-35.
91. Xu, B.; Xia, L.; Zhou, F.; et al. Enhancing electrocatalytic N2 reduction to NH3 by CeO2 nanorod with oxygen vacancies. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 2889-93.
92. Yang, X.; Tian, Y.; Mukherjee, S.; et al. Constructing oxygen vacancies via engineering heterostructured Fe3C/Fe3O4 catalysts for electrochemical ammonia synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202304797.
93. Zhang, L.; Li, R.; Cui, L.; et al. Boosting photocatalytic ammonia synthesis performance over OVs-rich Ru/W18O49: insights into the roles of oxygen vacancies in enhanced hydrogen spillover effect. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 461, 141892.
94. Jiang, F.; Wang, S.; Liu, B.; et al. Insights into the influence of CeO2 crystal facet on CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/CeO2 catalysts. ACS. Catal. 2020, 10, 11493-509.
95. Aika, K.; Kumasaka, M.; Oma, T.; et al. Support and promoter effect of ruthenium catalyst. III. Kinetics of ammonia synthesis over various Ru catalysts. Appl. Catal. 1986, 28, 57-68.
96. Fuller, J.; An, Q.; Fortunelli, A.; Goddard, W. A. Reaction mechanisms, kinetics, and improved catalysts for ammonia synthesis from hierarchical high throughput catalyst design. Acc. Chem. Res. 2022, 55, 1124-34.
97. Li, H.; Shang, J.; Ai, Z.; Zhang, L. Efficient visible light nitrogen fixation with BiOBr nanosheets of oxygen vacancies on the exposed {001} facets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6393-9.
98. Hirakawa, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Shiraishi, Y.; Hirai, T. Photocatalytic conversion of nitrogen to ammonia with water on surface oxygen vacancies of Titanium dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10929-36.
99. Lee, Y.; He, G.; Akey, A. J.; Si, R.; Flytzani-stephanopoulos, M.; Herman, I. P. Raman analysis of mode softening in nanoparticle CeO2-δ and Au-CeO2-δ during CO oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12952-5.
100. Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Liang, L.; et al. Unraveling the size-dependent effect of Ru-based catalysts on Ammonia synthesis at mild conditions. J. Catal. 2021, 404, 501-11.
101. Peng, X.; Chen, X.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Size-dependent activity of supported Ru catalysts for ammonia synthesis at mild conditions. J. Catal. 2022, 408, 98-108.
102. Hinrichsen, O.; Rosowski, F.; Hornung, A.; Muhler, M.; Ertl, G. The kinetics of ammonia synthesis over Ru-based catalysts. J. Catal. 1997, 165, 33-44.
103. Yao, Y.; Zhu, S.; Wang, H.; Li, H.; Shao, M. A spectroscopic study on the nitrogen electrochemical reduction reaction on gold and platinum surfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 1496-501.
104. Rossetti, I.; Forni, L. Effect of Ru loading and of Ru precursor in Ru/C catalysts for ammonia synthesis. Appl. Catal. A. Gen. 2005, 282, 315-20.
105. Li, Z. Ammonia synthesis on graphitic-nanofilament supported Ru catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A. Chem. 2004, 211, 103-9.
106. Wang, H.; Wu, Q.; Xiao, F. Design of zeolite-based catalysts by Le Chatelier's principle. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. Energy. 2025, 379, 125671.
107. Shin, J.; Jung, U.; Kim, J.; et al. Elucidating the effect of Ce with abundant surface oxygen vacancies on MgAl2O4-supported Ru-based catalysts for ammonia decomposition. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2024, 340, 123234.
108. Huang, C.; Yu, Y.; Tang, X.; et al. Hydrogen generation by ammonia decomposition over Co/CeO2 catalyst: influence of support morphologies. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 532, 147335.
109. Su, Q.; Gu, L.; Yao, Y.; et al. Layered double hydroxides derived Nix(MgyAlzOn) catalysts: enhanced ammonia decomposition by hydrogen spillover effect. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. 2017, 201, 451-60.
110. Zhang, B.; Yang, J.; Mu, Y.; et al. Fabrication of highly dispersed Ru catalysts on CeO2 for efficient C3H6 oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2024, 58, 19533-44.
111. Rocha, L. S. R.; Aparecido, Ciola. Amoresi. R.; Duarte, T. M.; et al. Experimental and theoretical interpretation of the order/disorder clusters in CeO2:La. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 510, 145216.
112. Ranasinghe, K. S.; Singh, R.; Leshchev, D.; Vasquez, A.; Stavitski, E.; Foster, I. Synthesis of nanoceria with varied ratios of Ce3+/Ce4+ utilizing soluble borate glass. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2363.
113. Zheng, C.; Mao, D.; Xu, Z.; Zheng, S. Strong Ru-CeO2 interaction boosts catalytic activity and stability of Ru supported on CeO2 nanocube for soot oxidation. J. Catal. 2022, 411, 122-34.
114. Castleton, C. W. M.; Kullgren, J.; Hermansson, K. Tuning LDA+U for electron localization and structure at oxygen vacancies in ceria. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 244704.
115. Tomar, S.; Bhadoria, B. S.; Jeong, H.; Choi, J. H.; Lee, S.; Bhattacharjee, S. Single-atom Pd catalyst on a CeO2 (111) surface for methane oxidation: activation barriers and reaction pathways. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2024, 128, 8580-9.
116. Guo, Y.; Mei, S.; Yuan, K.; et al. Low-temperature CO2 methanation over CeO2-supported Ru single atoms, nanoclusters, and nanoparticles competitively tuned by strong metal-support interactions and H-spillover effect. ACS. Catal. 2018, 8, 6203-15.
