Download PDF
Review  |  Open Access  |  8 Oct 2023

Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review

Views: 475 |  Downloads: 112 |  Cited:   2
Microstructures 2023;3:2023037.
10.20517/microstructures.2023.29 |  © The Author(s) 2023.
Author Information
Article Notes
Cite This Article

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid development of machine learning (ML) based on data-driven or environment interaction has injected new vitality into the field of meta-structure design. As a supplement to the traditional analysis methods based on physical formulas and rules, the involvement of ML has greatly accelerated the pace of performance exploration and optimization for meta-structures. In this review, we focus on the latest progress of ML in acoustic, elastic, and mechanical meta-structures from the aspects of band structures, wave propagation characteristics, and static characteristics. We finally summarize and envisage some potential research directions of ML in the field of meta-structures.

Keywords

Meta-structure, inverse design, machine learning, continuous fiber reinforced composite meta-structure, additive manufacture

INTRODUCTION

Meta-structures[1] are artificially designed functional structures that meet specific performance requirements and possess physical properties beyond the capabilities of natural materials. Based on different disciplines, acoustic meta-structures[2], mechanical meta-structures[3], electromagnetic meta-structures[4], and other types can be distinguished. Acoustic meta-structures[5], including phononic crystals, acoustic metamaterials, and acoustic metasurfaces, have emerged as an elegant means of manipulating acoustic and elastic waves. Through special structural designs, researchers can achieve dynamic characteristics that are not found in natural materials, enabling novel operations such as mechanical wave blocking[6], absorption[7,8], focusing[9,10], robust energy harvesting[11,12], negative refraction[13], invisibility[14,15], topological transmission[16], and more. The significant advancement in the field of acoustic meta-structures can be attributed primarily to the extensive research conducted on electronic crystals and photonic crystals. Matter waves and electromagnetic waves exhibit band structures separated by bandgaps under the action of Bloch periodic potential fields formed by the above structures. Bandgap formation is attributed to the Bragg scattering mechanism, which results from destructive interference between scattered waves caused by periodic structures. Phononic crystals[17,18], which are formed by the periodic distribution of materials or structures in space, can exhibit bandgaps that effectively block or attenuate the propagation of mechanical waves as an extension of the aforementioned concept. The subsequent development of localized resonant phononic crystals enables the formation of low-frequency hybridization bandgaps through scatterer resonance, independent of the periodicity of the structure itself[19]. The local resonance mechanism has triggered a revolutionary innovation in the realm of acoustic metamaterials[20]. On the one hand, the bandgap frequency is determined by the resonant unit frequency, providing theoretical support for developing compact structures with vibration and noise reduction functions in limited space requirements. On the other hand, it has been proven to possess new physical properties with locally resonant parameters, resulting in equivalent excotic properties. This has stimulated extensive research on negative mass density[21], negative bulk modulus[22,23], and double-negative parameters[24,25].

In the past decade, guided by the goal of achieving efficient regulation of low-frequency acoustic/elastic waves through thin and lightweight structures, researchers have developed acoustic metasurfaces by designing subwavelength functional unit arrays to form phase gradients based on the generalized Snell's law[26]. Acoustic metasurfaces[27] include reflective, absorptive, and transmissive types, which can achieve functions such as acoustic/elastic wave focusing[28], cloaking[29,30], low-frequency perfect absorption[31,32], asymmetric transmission[33], self-bending[34], and so forth. Compared with phononic crystals and acoustic metamaterials, acoustic metasurfaces have the characteristics of ultra-thin, planar, low loss, and strong designability, which make it possible to develop extremely miniaturized acoustic functional devices.

Recently, the concept of topological insulators in condensed matter physics has been added to the design of acoustic meta-structures for regulating mechanical waves[35-39]. Due to the existence of bandgaps, mechanical waves within specific frequency ranges are not allowed to propagate. In these bandgaps, acoustic meta-structures can be considered as insulators of mechanical waves. The topological properties of bandgaps can be characterized by calculating topological invariants and can generally be classified as topological trivial and topological non-trivial bandgaps[40,41]. On the structural boundaries with the above two bandgaps, certain frequencies of waves within the bandgap are allowed to propagate, which are the so-called topological edge states. Supported by topological mechanisms, topological edge states have robust transmission characteristics, such as defect immunity, unidirectional waveguides, and backscatter suppression effects[42,43]. The in-depth studies of topological states have broadened the application prospects of acoustic meta-structures to a certain extent.

The research on mechanical meta-structures primarily centers around the three material parameters of elastic modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson's ratio in order to attain exceptional static performance[3]. Natural solid materials typically exhibit positive elastic and shear moduli, which are related by Poisson's ratio, typically falling between 0 and 0.5. The mechanical meta-structures designed through origami and kirigami structures[44], chiral structures[45], lattice structures[46], honeycomb structures[47], and other methods can constrain and adjust the overall elastic deformation, thus exhibiting unconventional equivalent characteristics, such as negative stiffness, negative compression, negative Poisson's ratio, multi-stability, and so forth. Mechanical meta-structures greatly enrich the way of regulating statics performance and provide support for the design and application of engineering vibration suppression, impact resistance, energy absorption, and structural protection devices.

The process of analyzing the wave or mechanical properties of a certain meta-structure is a forward problem, which can be easily realized through theoretical, experimental, or commercial software analysis. However, designing structures with specific properties considering practical application backgrounds can essentially be attributed to inverse problems[48]. The traditional strategy for solving inverse problems usually relies on trial and error supported by experimental and computational modeling techniques, which require a significant amount of time and resource costs. Subsequently, some heuristic optimization methods that relied on global search were developed, such as genetic algorithms (GA)[49], simulated annealing algorithms[50], particle swarm optimization algorithms[51], and so forth. These methods can effectively identify the meta-structure parameters corresponding to the target property and can be modified to adapt to different goals. However, their performance generally depends on the specific problem, usually lacking stability and being prone to falling into local optima.

With the deepening of artificial intelligence (AI) research, the improvement of computer hardware performance, and the emergence of open-source deep learning frameworks, machine learning (ML) algorithms have been rapidly developed and widely applied, and advanced methods, such as deep neural networks (DNNs) and reinforcement learning (RL), have emerged. The development of ML has shown a strong ability to circumvent the shortcomings of traditional methods, leading to an interdisciplinary revolution, including biology[52], finance[53], materials science[54], computational chemistry[55], computational mechanics[56], etc. Certainly, the meta-structure design scheme based on intelligent algorithms has become an important core to break through the bottleneck of inverse problems and promote the development of the field. In the past several years, some review articles have introduced the latest progress of ML-enabled meta-structure design from different aspects, for instance, the progress of ML-enabled nanophotonics and photonic devices in an all-round way[57-66]. Furthermore, Khatib et al. introduced the progress in the field of designing electromagnetic meta-structures by ML[67]. Jiao et al. discussed the advent and prospects of ML in the field of mechanical meta-structures[68]. Jin et al. introduced some basic ML algorithm principles and reviewed intelligent on-demand design of phononic metamaterials[69]. Subsequently, Muhammad et al. and Liu et al. successively updated the progress of ML in phononic crystals and metamaterial[70,71]. From the works in recent years, the field of integrating ML in the design of acoustic, elastic, and mechanical meta-structures has developed rapidly, but there is still a lack of comprehensive review that directly takes design objectives as the classification standard, which is helpful to understand the latest progress of various inverse design problems in this field.

In this review, we draw attention to a series of recent results on ML inverse design of acoustic, elastic, and mechanical meta-structures from the perspective of design objectives. We first introduce the background of the development of ML and how basic algorithms can be combined with meta-structures for inverse design. Then, we summarize the latest progress from three aspects: design of band structure in infinite meta-structures, design of wave propagation characteristics in finite meta-structures, and design of static characteristics in mechanical meta-structures. Finally, we summarize the current status of this cutting-edge cross-disciplinary field and discuss potential future development prospects.

BACKGROUND OF ML

AI is committed to enabling machines to acquire and expand human intelligence. The development of AI can be traced back to the proposal of this concept at the Dartmouth Conference in 1956, but related research has already begun earlier. It has gone through periods of symbolism, connectionism, and behaviorism[72]. Early researchers constructed expert systems by feeding human experience into machines through programming, which is a symbolic approach. Although expert systems perform well in environments with strong logic, such as mathematical deduction, this approach cannot obtain new knowledge beyond input, and human intelligence is acquired through autonomous learning rather than direct input. Therefore, researchers turned to exploring ways to enable machines to autonomously acquire knowledge starting in the 1980s, a concept known as ML[73]. At this time, connectionism represented by an artificial neural network (ANN) algorithm ushered in the peak of development. Artificial neurons were proposed in 1943[74], followed by the development of a variable strength criterion for inter-unit connections, which led to the formation of a perceptron model[75]. In 1986, the success of the back-propagation training algorithm enabled the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model to have nonlinear processing capability[76]. On this basis, researchers began to explore the deepening of neural network models. Recurrent neural networks (RNN)[77] with time series prediction function and convolutional neural networks (CNN)[78] with image processing function were successively proposed. The deepening of the model has brought about an explosive increase in training difficulty, but this dilemma has been effectively overcome with the improvement of computer computing power. Since 2006, research on ANNs has entered the era of deep learning[79], and the emergence of many open-source deep learning frameworks has greatly reduced the learning cost of algorithms. Over the past decade, a large number of DNN models have emerged, such as generative adversarial networks (GAN)[80], condition GANs (CGAN)[81], tandem neural networks (TNN)[82], and so forth. RL, originating from behaviorism[83], has gradually emerged in the context of the flourishing development of deep learning. The basic principle is that the agent takes different actions to change its own state and corrects its behavior based on environmental feedback, thereby selecting the optimal strategy to achieve the goal. RL is seen as the future development direction of AI and has achieved great success in fields such as Go programs[84] and autonomous driving[85].

The advantage of DNNs lies in their ability to learn potential laws implicitly from data, especially for nonlinear mapping problems with unclear or complex physical mechanisms, and the design of meta-structures belongs to such problems. Unlike the process of calculating property from structural parameters in a forward problem, inverse design, which involves extrapolating the property back to the structure, often finds it difficult to obtain analytical solutions based on clear functional relationships. However, with the nonlinear processing ability of data-driven neural networks, the design parameters of the structure can be quickly obtained by taking the target property as input.

For situations where high-dimensional data or image data are used as property inputs, CNNs are often used to reduce the number of connections between neurons, thereby reducing the computational complexity of the computer. Autoencoders (AE) can be used to extract features from high-dimensional property data for further wave or mechanical analysis. In the inverse design meta-structure paradigm, there may be a problem that one property corresponds to multiple sets of structural parameters, which leads to the convergence failure of neural network training.

The proposal of TNN effectively solves this problem by freezing the training parameters of the pre-trained forward network and cascading it after the inverse network[82]. The subsequently developed probabilistic TNN can obtain multiple reasonable structures as alternative solutions based on inputs. Additionally, in order to deal with the situation of only small-scale data, researchers introduced transfer learning into meta-structure design[86,87]. Transfer the model trained from similar data sources to the target data for retraining, thereby reducing the demand for target data without affecting the training results.

Another solution is to rely on GAN[80] and CGAN[81]. In this solution, the generator of GAN takes random vectors as input, initiates the generation of a structure, and then sends the generated structure and real structure to the discriminator for authenticity discrimination to guide model updates. After adversarial training of the generator and discriminator, a generator model that can generate the target structure can be obtained. While inputting random vectors, the expected property can be input together to enable the generator to generate structures under this condition. The combination mode of RL and meta-structure inverse design is to regard structural parameters as agents. These agents execute the action of parameter changes, determine feedback based on the proximity of the altered property to the design goal, and finally explore a parameter path to achieve the goal.

As a summary, the overview diagram of ML in the field of meta-structure for forward performance prediction and inverse structure design is shown in Figure 1. In addition, there are various types of ML algorithms, some of which may be simple and perform well when dealing with specific problems. For example, linear regression obtains sample distribution patterns by fitting data points as closely as possible. Logistic regression can compress samples to a specific range through nonlinear functions, thus realizing the classification of samples. A decision tree is a tree-structured classifier that classifies samples by representing branches of different attributes. Multiple groups of decision trees can form a random forest, which yields higher performance and prediction stability. However, the increase in the complexity of the model requires more computing time. Readers can refer to relevant literature for more information[73,88,89].

Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review

Figure 1. ML in solving the problem of properties prediction and inverse design for meta-structures.

The emergence of some deep learning open-source frameworks, such as TensorFlow[90] and PyTorch[91], helps beginners easily grasp the basic usage of ML. These frameworks are integrated through Python packages and can be easily called, eliminating the hassle of writing low-level computational code for neural networks. Researchers can use some shared ready-made datasets for training and learning, such as Handwritten Digit Dataset, CIFAR10, Fashion-MNIST, and so forth. In addition, the commercial software MATLAB also has a built-in toolbox for neural networks, which can be easily modeled through the user interface.

APPLICATION OF ML IN META-STRUCTURES

Design of band structure in infinite meta-structures

A band structure is the most basic way to describe the acoustic/elastic wave characteristics in meta-structure, so it is the most direct research idea to carry out the application of ML in meta-structure design around a band structure and the wave information it carries. With the maturity of deep learning algorithms and open-source frameworks, a large amount of design work has emerged around band structures, which can be mainly divided into two categories: design based on complete band structures and design based on bandgaps. Table 1 provides a brief overview of ML for the design of band structures in infinite meta-structures.

Table 1

A brief overview of design based on band structures in infinite meta-structures

Design typeAlgorithmMeta-structure and performanceDescriptionYear
Complete
band
structures
MLP
RBF-NN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewRBF is suitable for single parameter prediction,
while MLP can meet multi-parameter
prediction[92]
2019
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewConstruct digital structure genomes through
forward prediction. Thus, the target property
structures can be quickly extracted from
the genomes[93]
2021
GAN
CNN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewGenerate optimal structure based on customized
dispersion and accelerate design processes[94]
2022
GAN
CNN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewGenerate and screen structures with excellent
attenuation performance. The dataset is generated
through secondary mirroring, which lacks flexibility[95]
2022
Tailoring
bandgaps
MLP
TNN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewCompared to MLP, TNN can solve the problem of
data inconsistency and is suitable for multi-parameter
inverse design[96]
2019
GA
MLP
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThe model is insufficient to provide accurate
predictions beyond the training data range and only
performs well within local data points[97]
2020
GA
MLP
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThe model can obtain the target modular metamaterial
but cannot find the configuration beyond the dataset[98]
2020
AE
MLP
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewCan accurately process data beyond the dataset. Only
a relatively small region of the design space
in RVE is explored using a nine-parameter
analytical function[99]
2020
GA
MLP
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewFast forward search to obtain the maximum bandgap
structure. Performed well in both single-objective
and multi-objective optimization
designs[100]
2021
MLPMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewFlexible design of meta-structures based on target
bandgap for vibration isolation. The designed structure
has been experimentally
verified[101]
2022
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewArch-shaped vibration isolation structure inspired
by the Roman Bridge. The TNN model can design structure
accurately based on target
bandgaps and verified through experiments[102]
2022
RLMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewEfficient interactive inverse design for layered
phononic crystals. For the same model, simply changing the
objective function can easily
achieve different designs[103]
2020
RL
GA
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewDesigning one-dimensional diatomic and hexatomic
lattice chains based on RL. The rate of convergence
is much faster than the baseline GA[104]
2021
RLMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewDesigning a one-dimensional phononic beam based
on RL. The model still maintains an efficient and
stable exploration ability in
the huge parameter space[105]
2022

Complete band structures

For the design of complete band structures, one type of work is to predict the corresponding band structure of a meta-structure from a forward perspective to replace the analytical process. Liu and Yu[92] used MLP and radial basis function neural networks (RBF-NN) to predict the band structures of one-dimensional layered phononic crystals and compared their efficiency and accuracy. The input parameters of the neural networks are one to three selected from the filling fraction, mass density ratio, and shear-designed structure. The accuracy in predicting band structures is achieved using a single parameter (fill fraction), while in the case of multiple parameters, MLP outperforms RBF-NN.

Another type of work is to use trained forward models to assist in the selection of alternative structures after inverse design. Zhang et al. constructed a digital structural genome using CNN to achieve structural screening with specified elastic wave properties[93]. For representative volume elements (RVEs) of size 5 × 5, each unit has two coding forms, with a total of 225 possible configurations, which makes it difficult to find configurations with target elastic wave properties. Their approach is to calculate the band structures of a small portion of RVEs using a finite element method and extract wave properties to construct a dataset. Then, by using data-driven CNN to predict the elastic wave properties of all possible configurations, a digitally structured genome is constructed. For a set of target elastic wave properties, the corresponding structure can be found in the genome. Jiang et al. proposed a novel way to inverse design similar digitally coded metamaterials, as shown in Figure 2A[94]. This work can be divided into three steps: first, train CNN to predict the band structures; second, train GAN to generate digitally coded metamaterials from band structures; and finally, take out the generator of GAN and connect it with CNN. The overall workflow is as follows: the generator takes random noise and target band structures as inputs, generating a series of alternative structures. Predict the corresponding band structures of all candidate structures through CNN and then compare them with the target band structure to screen the best structure. Almost at the same time, Han et al. employed the same design process to realize inverse design of digitally coded metamaterials with optimal wave attenuation[95]. It is worth noting that this work characterizes the wave attenuation ability of the structure through complex band structures. Although the design process focuses on the real part of the band structures, the final screening process from alternative structures is achieved by comparing the imaginary part of band structures.

Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review

Figure 2. ML for the design of band structure in infinite meta-structures. (A) Combining GAN and CNN to realize inverse design of digitally coded metamaterials with anticipated band structures[94]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[94] Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (B) Design phononic crystals with anticipated bandgaps by combining AE and MLP[99]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[99] Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (C) Design phononic crystals with anticipated bandgaps by combining GA and MLP[100]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[100] Copyright 2023, Taylor & Francis. (D) Employ MLP to design lightweight meta-structures with low-frequency broadband vibration isolation functions[101].

Tailoring bandgaps

From an application perspective, it is usually not necessary to determine the complete band structures but only focuses on the wave information provided by the bandgaps in the band structures. In contrast, the design based on bandgaps simplifies the difficulty of model training and has a stronger design purpose, so a lot of work has been carried out in this area.

Liu et al. employed MLP and TNN to achieve inverse design from bandgaps to structures for the layered phononic crystals[96]. The basic conclusion is that for inverse design with single (filling fraction) or dual (shear modulus ratio and mass density ratio) parameters, MLP and TNN perform equally. However, for inverse design with three parameters, TNN has obvious advantages, while MLP has difficulty in convergence. This is due to the increase in the number of design parameters deepens the nonlinearity of the mapping, leading to the gradual exposure of data inconsistency issues. As mentioned in the introduction, TNN can effectively solve this training bottleneck. Dong et al. proposed using GA to optimize MLP architecture for fast prediction of bandgap width[97]. The starting point of this study is to serve as an efficient means to avoid the significant computational costs required for repeated finite element analysis of elastic meta-structures. Wu et al. explored a design and optimization scheme of modular metamaterial using ML[98]. In their work, modular metamaterials are composed of a certain number of four candidate materials through different configurations to form phononic crystals. By using GA and MLP, they realize the optimal configuration design of one-dimensional and two-dimensional (2D) modular metamaterial according to the bandgap target. Li et al. combined an AE with MLP to achieve 2D phononic crystal design with anticipated bandgaps, as shown in Figure 2B[99]. The RVE of phononic crystals is generated through random functions, and the band structure data are obtained through a finite element method. The implementation of this design consists of three steps. Firstly, the AE is trained to extract the topological features of the RVE configuration. Secondly, an MLP model is trained to describe the relationship between the anticipated bandgap and topological features. Finally, the encoder in the AE is replaced with MLP. Miao et al. conducted another study on the design of 2D phononic crystals described by random functions, as shown in Figure 2C[100]. In this work, they first employed MLP to predict the bandgap and then used MLP combined with GA to achieve the inverse design of the structure. In the inverse design scheme, GA is taken as the main body, and the fitness function is constructed with the predicted bandgap of MLP and the target bandgap in the iterative process, and the optimal individual that can adapt to the target bandgap is obtained through iteration.

In terms of meta-structure design with high-quality vibration reduction function, Jin et al. employed MLP to inverse design the Archimedes spiral meta-structure with deep subwavelength vibration isolation function, as shown in Figure 2D[101]. The double-layer corrugated core sandwiched structure between two spiral plates can provide low-frequency bandgaps through a local resonance mechanism. However, it is difficult to analyze the relationship between the bandgap and the parameters of the spiral plate. The trained MLP model avoided the analytical process of inverse design and obtained a structure with low-frequency broadband vibration isolation performance, which showed good consistency with the experiment. On et al. modified the TNN architecture and realized the design of arch meta-structure with anticipated bandgap vibration reduction function[102]. Specifically, they inverted the pre-trained forward network and inverse design network in traditional TNN, where the input is a structural parameter, while the intermediate layer outputs the bandgap frequency. After training, preserving the inverse network of the backend can achieve the design of bandgap frequencies to structures.

The application of RL in band structures is mainly to maximize the bandgap width or optimize the specific range and focuses on one-dimensional structures with analytical dispersion relation. According to the analytical dispersion relation of layered phononic crystals, Luo et al. used RL to optimize the component widths and realized two functions: maximizing the bandgap width and customizing the bandgap range[103]. Wu et al. employed RL to optimize the masses of one-dimensional atomic chains to achieve custom bandgaps[104]. He et al. analyzed the longitudinal wave dispersion of periodically variable cross-section beams and optimized three length parameters using RL to achieve maximum bandgap width[105].

Design of wave propagation characteristics in finite meta-structures

Different from the ideal infinite period meta-structures, the meta-structures in practical engineering can only be composed of periodic or aperiodic finite distributions. Analyzing the propagation characteristics of acoustic/elastic waves in finite meta-structures is an important step toward achieving practical engineering applications for meta-structures. In this section, we review the finite meta-structure design works around propagation characteristics. Table 2 provides a brief overview of ML for the design of wave propagation characteristics in finite meta-structures.

Table 2

A brief overview of design based on wave propagation characteristics in infinite meta-structures

Design typeAlgorithmMeta-structure and performanceDescriptionYear
Enhancing
noise
reduction
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewPredicted the absorption spectra of
metasurfaces based on CNN and conducted
experimental verification[106]
2021
CNN
CGAN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewPrediction of sound absorption spectra
of absorbers based on CNN and inverse
design based on CGAN[107]
2022
GANMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThe generated structures can have
completely new configurations and rich local
features. They can be in good agreement with
experimental results[108]
2021
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewOvercoming the data inconsistency
caused by the complex coupling effect between
Fabry Perot channels, the experimental
results are in good agreement[109]
2022
RLMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewExploring deep subwavelength broadband
sound absorption meta-structures based on
RL, replacing the artificial selection of
structural parameters. The accuracy of
the design was verified through sound
absorption experiments[110]
2022
RLMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewEmploying RL to optimize the huge
parameter space with nine aperture parameters
to design broadband sound absorption
meta-structures, and further validated through
experimentation[111]
2023
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewInverse design of the absorber based
on the target absorption spectrum by employing
a one-dimensional CNN model. The difficulty
lies in the selection of neural network
structure and hyperparameters[112]
2021
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewInverse design of the absorber based on
the target absorption spectrum by employing
TNN. The model uses fewer hyperparameters
and has higher accuracy and efficiency than
traditional CNN[113]
2023
MLP
gaussian
sampling
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThe inverse design incorporating probability
sampling can obtain all possible structures.
The transmission spectrum measured in the
experiment is highly consistent with the predicted
results, and the accuracy of the report is
better than models such as ANN and GAN[114]
2020
CGANMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewApplying CGAN to generate sound insulation
structure. The generated structure may not fully
conform to physical laws, and the dataset may
have a few duplicate samples[115]
2021
Advanced
control
of
wave
propagation
characteristics
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewTNN effectively handles the increase in
non-inconsistency of the dataset caused
by non-local coupling effects[116]
2021
TNN
gaussian
sampling
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewIntroducing probability sampling in the
middle layer of TNN, the design parameters
have high flexibility, diversity, and robustness[117]
2022
TNN
gaussian
sampling
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewA probabilistic model is a powerful tool
to solve data inconsistency and has strong
robustness to sensitive parameter design[118]
2021
CNN
GA
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewEmploying CNN to achieve inverse design of
metasurfaces based on multi-point sound
pressure and the accuracy report is better
than GA[119]
2021
MLPMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewReplace the physical unit with MLP and
transfer the input response, material properties,
and output response of the whole system
through the connection between MLPs[104].
2021
MLPMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewMLP captures the relationship between
the input and output wave responses of physical
units to construct the overall structure and
replace the time-consuming numerical
simulation process[120]
2022
Optimizing
topological
states
ClusteringMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThrough clustering algorithms, topological
classification is carried out according
to the real characteristics of the system,
without prior knowledge and calculation
of topological invariant[121]
2020
MLPMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewInverse design of phononic plate with
anticipated bandgap width and topological
property Using MLP. The quality of the edge
state can be freely controlled through the
preset bandgap width[122]
2021
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewTNN overcomes data inconsistency and supports
inverse design structures based on
topological properties to achieve custom
interface states[105]
2022
TNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review
Experimental verification of the accuracy of
using TNN to inverse design interface
states[123]
2022
MLP
GA
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewEfficient implementation of edge state design
for specific or maximum bandwidth
corresponding structures[124]
2022

Enhancing noise reduction

Arranging sound absorption structures is one of the main methods for controlling environmental noise, which can be divided into porous sound absorption structures, resonant sound absorption structures, and special sound absorption structures, and has been widely used. The ability of a structure to absorb sound energy is usually characterized by calculating its sound absorption coefficient. Due to the complexity and diversity of the structure, design is an important step to meet practical needs. Researchers have conducted extensive explorations in this area using ML. For example, Donda et al. employed CNN to characterize the acoustic absorption performance of acoustic absorbing metasurfaces[106]. Subsequently, they implemented the inverse design of the metasurface using CGAN[107]. Zhang et al. realized the accelerated topological design of metaporous materials with broadband sound absorption performance by GAN[108]. Liu et al. used cascaded inverse and forwarded CNN to achieve the inverse design of acoustic absorbing devices with coiled Fabry-Perot channels, which is based on the same principle as a fully connected TNN architecture[109]. Jin et al. used RL to optimize a lightweight sound absorption multi-function integrated meta-structure with perforated fish-belly panels[110]. Subsequently, they used this method to optimize a spiral plate sandwich structure that integrates lightweight, vibration reduction, and sound absorption functions[111]. Mahesh et al. proposed a one-dimensional CNN inverse design scheme for low-frequency Helmholtz resonate sound absorber[112]. Afterward, they further constructed a TNN architecture using inverse and forward one-dimensional CNNs for inverse design of a similar sound-absorbing structure[113].

Sound insulation is another method of controlling noise, with the objective of blocking or attenuating the transmission of acoustic waves. It typically relies on the transmission coefficient to characterize the performance of the sound insulation structure in blocking sound energy. For the design enabled by ML in sound insulation meta-structures, Luo et al. provided a paradigm of fuzzy design to overcome the problem of data inconsistency, as shown in Figure 3A[114]. Specifically, they combine MLP with mixed Gaussian sampling, mapping a target transmission spectrum to multiple sets of Gaussian sampling parameters through MLP and then linearly overlaying these Gaussian distributions to obtain a mixed Gaussian distribution. All acoustic meta-structures corresponding to the local maximum values are alternative structures that meet the target transmission frequency spectrum. Gurbuz et al. used a random algorithm to generate binary images of units composed of fluid elements and solid elements and obtained the transmission loss spectra through the finite element method[115]. Then, by training CGAN to capture the potential relationship between transmission loss spectrum and unit geometry, they carried out inverse design of the structural units to achieve the required sound insulation purpose.

Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review

Figure 3. ML for the design of wave propagation characteristics in finite meta-structures. (A) Fuzzy design of acoustic meta-structures by combining MLP with Gaussian mixture sampling[114]. (B) Employ MLP to realize global transfer matrix prediction of active metabeams[120]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[120] Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (C) Employ MLP to realize the design of metaplates with robust edge states[122]. (D) Design of Valley Hall acoustic topological insulator by combining MLP and GA[124].

Advanced control of wave propagation characteristics

Subwavelength scale metasurfaces may experience significant losses due to the presence of viscous friction and narrow acoustic channels. The diffraction acoustic meta-grating designed based on diffraction theory can improve the control efficiency of the acoustic metasurface. Ding et al. employed the TNN model to achieve inverse design of non-local metasurfaces for acoustic wave diffraction characteristics[116]. They explored the coupling effect between all subunits rather than nearest-neighbor coupling, demonstrating the ability of non-local metasurfaces to reshape the acoustic field. Meanwhile, the implementation of this work effectively demonstrates the ability of TNN to support the design of non-local coupled metasurfaces, especially in the face of complex coupling effects that greatly increase the degree of nonlinearity. In another work, Du et al. designed acoustic meta-grating wavelength division multiplexing by using an improved TNN architecture[117]. Specifically, they introduced probability sampling in the TNN architecture, which divides the design space into two layers instead of the traditional one layer for design parameters. Among them, the latter layer is the design parameters of the structure, obtained by sampling from the Gaussian distribution parameters of the previous layer. The probabilistic TNN model has a strong generalization ability, greatly reducing the design cost of acoustic meta-grating wavelength division multiplexing. It demonstrates the flexibility, diversity, and robustness of design parameters.

The acoustic cloak technology aims to reduce the sound signals generated by objects in order to reduce the detectability of the sound detection system and achieve the effect of stealth. Ahmed et al. implemented a design of a multilayer core-shell acoustic cloak using probabilistic TNN architecture, demonstrating its effectiveness in solving the problem of high sensitivity of stealth cloaks to design parameters[118]. Stealth requirements weaken or even eliminate the disturbance of objects to the sound field, while in some practical needs, it is desired to freely weaken or enhance the sound field in certain specific areas. In this aspect, Zhao et al. proposed a CNN-based inverse design of metasurface phase gradient to achieve the regional control of sound field enhancement or attenuation[119].

In addition, research has attempted to enable MLP to learn the physical mechanisms of a single unit and then use it to construct a functional analysis of wave propagation in the overall structure. For example, Wu et al. used MLP to learn the input-output relationship of longitudinal waves in non-uniform thin rod elements and then assembled multiple MLP elements to construct a non-uniform overall structure[104]. A series of cascaded MLP units describe the input-output relationship of the overall structure and then use optimization algorithms to determine the design parameters of each individual unit. Similarly, Chen et al. used MLP for transfer matrix prediction of active metabeam elements, as shown in Figure 3B[120]. In their work, the metabeam unit is constructed by affixing a piezoelectric material on the main beam and connecting a negative capacitance circuit. By using COMSOL software to obtain transfer matrices for different capacitance values and frequencies, a dataset is constructed and used for MLP training. The global transfer matrix of the array elements can be obtained by connecting multiple groups of MLP in sequence, then the output and input signals of the whole metabeam can be connected.

Optimizing topological states

A topological state is also an important form of wave characteristics in finite structures. We now turn to focus on some recent design works on topological states. Generally speaking, topological invariants can characterize topological properties of structures, but their definition and calculation are often difficult. In essence, topological properties certainly exist in structural features, so exploring topological properties from actual structures instead of relying on topological invariants is another idea for topological classification. Long et al. demonstrated an unsupervised clustering algorithm for extracting topological features of phononic crystals, thereby classifying topological properties[121]. He et al. achieved the inverse design of phononic crystal thin plates with anticipated bandgap width and topological property based on MLP, as shown in Figure 3C[122]. By designing two units with a broadband common bandgap, they constructed a highly robust localized edge state for bending wave transmission. This group subsequently proposed using TNN to achieve the inverse design of phononic beams from topological properties to structure[105]. The topological properties of the bandgap were characterized by the reflection phase, and the interface states of one-dimensional phononic beams were predicted and constructed using TNN. Afterward, Muhammad et al. also completed a similar work[123]. Du et al. realized the inverse design of Valley Hall acoustic topological insulator by combining MLP and GA, as shown in Figure 3D[124]. Specifically, they first trained regression neural networks and classification neural networks for predicting bandgap and topological properties, respectively. Then, two neural networks are put into the optimization process of GA to obtain two structures with opposite topological properties under a common bandgap for constructing edge states.

The application of ML in Hermitian systems mentioned above is still in the initial stage, and more achievements need to be further expanded. At the same time, we have also found that ML has recently made some attempts in non-Hermitian systems. Yu et al. used diffusion maps to unsupervised manifold learning of topological phases in non-Hermitian systems[125]. Different from the unsupervised method, there are also some works that demonstrate training ANNs for supervised prediction of non-Hermite topological invariants[126-128]. The essential difference between unsupervised and supervised is that the former does not need labels and directly extracts topological invariant from the on-site elements of the model, while the latter relies on the calculated topological invariant as labels to construct data sets. In non-Hermitian systems, an exception point (EP) is an important feature that represents the critical point at which the system transitions from a real eigen-spectrum to a complex eigen-spectrum[129]. In the latest work, Reja et al. introduced neural networks for the characterization of EP[130]. They proposed a method called summed phase rigidity (SPR) to characterize the order of EPs in different models. Then, they trained MLP models to realize the prediction of EPs for two-site and four-site gain and loss models.

Design of static characteristics in mechanical meta-structures

Mechanical meta-structures have become an emerging growth point in the field of ML-enabling design due to their extreme statics performance. Combined with ML, meta-structures with excellent mechanical properties can be obtained through design optimization by adding, deleting, or changing. Table 3 provides a brief overview of ML for the design of static characteristics in mechanical meta-structures.

Table 3

A brief overview of design based on static characteristics in mechanical meta-structures

Design typeAlgorithmMeta-structure and performanceDescriptionYear
2D
structure
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewThe inverse design of high toughness
hierarchical structures based on CNN greatly
saves computational time compared to
traditional finite element methods[131]
2018
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewEffectively searching for the optimal cutting
mode for stretchable graphene kirigami
structures under given yield strain and
stress conditions based on CNN models[132]
2018
Supervised AEMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewGenerate the structure by passing potential
variables to the decoder. It is expected
to find new structures, but the
prediction of mechanics performance beyond the
dataset may be biased[133]
2020
CNNMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewCNN for predicting 2D metamaterials with the
best mechanical properties. The model exhibits
robustness in terms of accuracy and
inference time[134]
2020
DCGAN
CNN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewCombine DCGAN and CNN for designing
microstructures. The model has high efficiency
and can flexibly control geometric constraints[135]
2019
CNN
GA
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewCombining CNN and GA can find Pareto's
optimal structural design using a relatively
small dataset, even with complex nonlinear
constraints[136]
2021
CNN
GAN
Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewInverse design of 2D metamaterial based
on predefined Poisson's ratio. The model
can generate structures beyond the dataset and
exhibit responses similar to real structures[137]
2022
1D/3D
structure
MLPMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewRealize accurate prediction of variable
thickness curved beams and their properties.
Efficient and accurate optimization design
results were obtained with different optimization
objectives[138]
2020
GANMachine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a reviewGenerate lightweight and high load-bearing
performance lattice structures using GAN and
conduct experimental verification[139]
2021

A lot of work has been carried out around the 2D mechanical meta-structures. These structures are usually designed and optimized on a plane to obtain specific shapes or material compositions with specific mechanical properties. CNN, as a high-quality model for image feature extraction, is widely used in the design of 2D mechanical meta-structures. Gu et al. proposed a self-learning CNN model to search for high-performance hierarchical mechanical structures[131]. This model can continuously learn patterns from high-performance structures, ultimately achieving design results superior to the training set. Hanakata et al. reported a design study on stretchable graphene kirigami, as shown in Figure 4A[132]. The cutting density and cutting position control the elastic stretchability of graphene kirigami. They first trained CNN through supervision to predict the stretchability of graphene kirigami expressed by yield strain. Then, in the inverse design, the CNN is trained using the dataset obtained from molecular dynamics calculations, and the model is gradually trained using the best performance predicted by the CNN. In subsequent research[133], they proposed a supervised AE to design graphene kirigami. Kollmann et al. reported the 2D metamaterial design with either maximum bulk modulus, maximum shear modulus, or minimum Poisson's ratio using CNN[134]. The dataset of their work is generated by the topology optimization framework based on the energy homogenization method and periodic boundary conditions.

Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review

Figure 4. ML for the design of static characteristics in mechanical meta-structures. (A) Searching for the graphene kirigami with the best stretching performance through gradual training of CNN[132]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[132] Copyright 2018, the American Physical Society. (B) Combining CNN and GA to realize lattice metamaterial design satisfying additive manufacturing constraints[136]. (C) Design of curved beams with best mechanical properties based on MLP and optimization methods[138]. Reproduced with the permission of Ref.[138]Copyright 2020, Elsevier. (D) Design of lightweight lattice structures by GAN-based inverse design framework[139].

To optimize the structure to obtain a 2D structure with the best mechanical properties, CNN is often combined with GAN or GA. Tan et al. reported a model in which deep convolutional GANs (DCGAN) are used to generate candidates adhering to geometric constraints, while CNN associates microstructures with properties[135]. After training, combine the two models for inverse design microstructural materials with specific mechanical properties. Garland et al. demonstrated the design of structural lattice metamaterial combining CNN and GA to meet the constraints of additive manufacturing, as shown in Figure 4B[136]. In addition, Wang et al. and Chang et al. also used this design paradigm to realize the inverse design of shell-based mechanical metamaterial and auxetic metamaterial with zero Poisson’s ratio, respectively[140,141]. Tian et al. proposed the combination of CNN and GAN to achieve customized Poisson's ratio meta-structure design[137]. CNN is trained to predict the global Poisson's ratio response of a given meta-structure, while GAN realizes the structural inverse design of the anticipated Poisson's ratio response through adversarial training.

In addition, some works have been done to design and optimize specific mechanical properties of one-dimensional or three-dimensional (3D) meta-structures. Liu et al. demonstrated a design work of curved beams based on MLP and optimization methods, as shown in Figure 4C[138]. The mechanical properties of curved beams are characterized by stiffness, forward snapping force, and backward snapping force and are controlled by thickness distributions. They first trained MLP to predict the mechanical properties of curved beams with variable thickness and then put the trained MLP model into the optimization cycle proposed by Gu et al., as mentioned above, to optimize the thickness distribution with the best mechanical properties[131]. Challapalli et al. demonstrated the GAN-based inverse design framework for optimizing lightweight lattice structures, as shown in Figure 4D[139]. The basic idea of this framework is to add initial conditions, boundary conditions, and forward regression to the real data distinguished by discriminators to obtain structural units with excellent performance. The new dataset is then used for GAN training, and the process is iterated repeatedly to obtain the structure with the best mechanical performance.

CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK

In this review, we have discussed the combination and synchronous development of ML and meta-structure and reviewed the recent flexible applications of ML algorithms in the fields of acoustics, elastic, and mechanical meta-structures from the aspects of band structures, wave propagation characteristics, and static characteristics. Through analysis, we have come to the following main conclusions:

(1) The forward performance prediction of meta-structures can usually rely on analytical formulas or simulation software. The purpose of introducing ML is to save time and computing resources or to provide a forward computing part for some combined inverse design schemes. The inverse design of meta-structures is difficult to deal with analytically. DNNs with strong nonlinear modeling capabilities effectively solve this problem and can directly serve as alternative models for inverse problems. In addition, RL can also serve as an inverse design algorithm in meta-structures to explore structures that meet customized performance goals in the parameter space.

(2) A crucial issue in the inverse design process is how to alleviate data inconsistency. There are two main ideas. One approach is based on deterministic strategies, with representative approaches being: 1. TNN architecture with inverse and forward network concatenation. 2. Combining MLP (or CNN) with an AE. The former achieves mapping from performance to features, while the latter achieves structure reconstruction from features. 3. Combining MLP (or CNN) with GA. The former achieves performance prediction through pre-training and then adds it to the iterative process of the latter. Another approach is based on probabilistic strategies; the main approach is to use Gaussian sampling after the data passes through the neural network rather than directly mapping to the structure or introducing Gaussian sampling in the middle design layer of the TNN architecture. Compared to deterministic strategies, probabilistic strategies have more diverse design choices.

(3) As the functional requirements of meta-structures become more critical, the design of meta-structures based on specific goals becomes more and more complex, which makes many advanced algorithms constantly develop and combine to meet the requirements. The support of an open-source framework makes the development of relevant algorithms for meta-structure design easier, even for the researchers without professional backgrounds in ML, which is an important reason for this field in a period of vigorous development and growth.

Although the research on the combination of ML and meta-structures has aroused great interest and attention in recent years, and many research achievements have been made, there are still many problems that restrict further development. The main problems and future directions can be summarized as follows:

(1) Obtaining data is often difficult, especially for problems without analytical solutions or high numerical calculation costs. Therefore, it is necessary to develop algorithms that only need small dataset training, such as reducing the demand for source data by transfer learning. Additionally, there is currently a lack of commonly used datasets in the field of meta-structure design. If researchers can share some datasets of conventional meta-structures, it will be easy to achieve data migration and fusion in the future.

(2) ANNs are often seen as black boxes, wherein the input of a set of structural parameters naturally results in the output of a corresponding set of performance parameters. Exploring what changes the data has undergone in the process of layer-by-layer transmission, in other words, how the structural parameters change step by step toward the performance parameters after each layer of operation, is important research to uncover the interpretability application of neural networks in the field of meta-structures.

(3) The research on some new physical concepts, such as non-Hermite smart phononic crystals, is in full swing in the field of meta-structures. What role ML can play in these new physical mechanisms is a question that can be deeply explored at present.

(4) The research of meta-structure mainly involves design and manufacturing. ML can theoretically provide excellent design results for various acoustic or mechanical requirements of targets, but most current research lacks manufacturing and experimental verification after design. Therefore, more consideration of manufacturing and verification is an important prerequisite for the application of this field.

(5) Multifunctional integration is an important direction of the development of meta-structures at present, which may involve the coupling of multiple physical fields, such as acoustics, mechanics, electromagnetism, and heat. Developing ML algorithms for multifunctional meta-structure design with multi-physical field characteristics is not only a challenge but also a promising direction. The path planning problem of multifunctional integrated composite meta-structure configuration in 3D printing containing continuous fibers is one of the important reasons currently restricting the manufacturing of complex composite structures. By introducing ML algorithms to optimize the fiber distribution direction field of continuous fiber path planning, a collaborative optimization scheme between continuous fiber path and functional structure configuration can be achieved, which is expected to become an important means for the manufacturing of complex composite meta-structures in the future.

DECLARATIONS

Authors’ contributions

Supervision, conceptualization, validation, project administration, funding acquisition: Jin Y, Li Y, Zhuang X

Original draft preparation, reviewing, and editing: He L, Li Y, Torrent D, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Jin Y

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFB4602000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.12272267 and No. 52278411), the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2021QNRC001), the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (No. 22JC1404100 and No. 21JC1405600), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. This publication is part of Project No. PID2021-124814NB-C22, funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033, “FEDER, A way of making Europe”.

Conflicts of interest

All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

REFERENCES

1. Kumar R, Kumar M, Chohan JS, Kumar S. Overview on metamaterial: history, types and applications. Mater Today Proc 2022;56:3016-24.

2. Ma G, Sheng P. Acoustic metamaterials: from local resonances to broad horizons. Sci Adv 2016;2:e1501595.

3. Yu X, Zhou J, Liang H, Jiang Z, Wu L. Mechanical metamaterials associated with stiffness, rigidity and compressibility: a brief review. Prog Mater Sci 2018;94:114-73.

4. Cui T. Electromagnetic metamaterials - from effective media to field programmable systems. Sci Sin Inf 2020;50:1427.

5. Jin Y, Pennec Y, Bonello B, et al. Physics of surface vibrational resonances: pillared phononic crystals, metamaterials, and metasurfaces. Rep Prog Phys 2021;84:086502.

6. Wu X, Wen Z, Jin Y, Rabczuk T, Zhuang X, Djafari-rouhani B. Broadband rayleigh wave attenuation by gradient metamaterials. Int J Mech Sci 2021;205:106592.

7. Cao L, Yang Z, Xu Y, et al. Flexural wave absorption by lossy gradient elastic metasurface. J Mech Phy Solids 2020;143:104052.

8. Huang S, Zhou Z, Li D, et al. Compact broadband acoustic sink with coherently coupled weak resonances. Sci Bull 2020;65:373-9.

9. Jin Y, Wang W, Khelif A, Djafari-rouhani B. Elastic metasurfaces for deep and robust subwavelength focusing and imaging. Phys Rev Appl 2021;15:024005.

10. Wang W, Iglesias J, Jin Y, Djafari-rouhani B, Khelif A. Experimental realization of a pillared metasurface for flexural wave focusing. APL Mater 2021;9:051125.

11. Wen Z, Jin Y, Gao P, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Djafari-rouhani B. Topological cavities in phononic plates for robust energy harvesting. Mech Syst Signal Process 2022;162:108047.

12. Wen Z, Wang W, Khelif A, Djafari-rouhani B, Jin Y. A perspective on elastic metastructures for energy harvesting. Appl Phys Lett 2022;120:020501.

13. He H, Qiu C, Ye L, et al. Topological negative refraction of surface acoustic waves in a Weyl phononic crystal. Nature 2018;560:61-4.

14. Jin Y, Fang X, Li Y, Torrent D. Engineered diffraction gratings for acoustic cloaking. Phys Rev Appl 2019;11:011004.

15. Zhou H, Fu W, Wang Y, Wang Y, Laude V, Zhang C. Ultra-broadband passive acoustic metasurface for wide-angle carpet cloaking. Mater Des 2021;199:109414.

16. Zhang X, Xiao M, Cheng Y, Lu M, Christensen J. Topological sound. Commun Phys 2018;1:97.

17. Kushwaha MS, Halevi P, Dobrzynski L, Djafari-Rouhani B. Acoustic band structure of periodic elastic composites. Phys Rev Lett 1993;71:2022-5.

18. Martínez-sala R, Sancho J, Sánchez JV, Gómez V, Llinares J, Meseguer F. Sound attenuation by sculpture. Nature 1995;378:241.

19. Liu Z, Zhang X, Mao Y, et al. Locally resonant sonic materials. Science 2000;289:1734-6.

20. Liao G, Luan C, Wang Z, Liu J, Yao X, Fu J. Acoustic metamaterials: a review of theories, structures, fabrication approaches, and applications. Adv Mater Technol 2021;6:2000787.

21. Yang Z, Mei J, Yang M, Chan NH, Sheng P. Membrane-type acoustic metamaterial with negative dynamic mass. Phys Rev Lett 2008;101:204301.

22. Fang N, Xi D, Xu J, et al. Ultrasonic metamaterials with negative modulus. Nat Mater 2006;5:452-6.

23. Ding C, Hao L, Zhao X. Two-dimensional acoustic metamaterial with negative modulus. J Appl Phys 2010;108:074911.

24. Lee SH, Park CM, Seo YM, Wang ZG, Kim CK. Composite acoustic medium with simultaneously negative density and modulus. Phys Rev Lett 2010;104:054301.

25. Li J, Chan CT. Double-negative acoustic metamaterial. Phys Rev E 2004;70:055602.

26. Yu N, Genevet P, Kats MA, et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 2011;334:333-7.

27. Assouar B, Liang B, Wu Y, Li Y, Cheng J, Jing Y. Acoustic metasurfaces. Nat Rev Mater 2018;3:460-72.

28. Qi S, Li Y, Assouar B. Acoustic focusing and energy confinement based on multilateral metasurfaces. Phys Rev Appl 2017;7:054006.

29. Faure C, Richoux O, Félix S, Pagneux V. Experiments on metasurface carpet cloaking for audible acoustics. Appl Phys Lett 2016;108:064103.

30. Sounas DL, Fleury R, Alù A. Unidirectional cloaking based on metasurfaces with balanced loss and gain. Phys Rev Appl 2015;4:014005.

31. Huang S, Fang X, Wang X, Assouar B, Cheng Q, Li Y. Acoustic perfect absorbers via spiral metasurfaces with embedded apertures. Appl Phys Lett 2018;113:233501.

32. Ji J, Li D, Li Y, Jing Y. Low-frequency broadband acoustic metasurface absorbing panels. Front Mech Eng 2020;6:586249.

33. Li Y, Shen C, Xie Y, et al. Tunable asymmetric transmission via lossy acoustic metasurfaces. Phys Rev Lett 2017;119:035501.

34. Fang X, Wang X, Li Y. Acoustic splitting and bending with compact coding metasurfaces. Phys Rev Appl 2019;11:064033.

35. Wang P, Lu L, Bertoldi K. Topological phononic crystals with one-way elastic edge waves. Phys Rev Lett 2015;115:104302.

36. Torrent D, Mayou D, Sánchez-dehesa J. Elastic analog of graphene: dirac cones and edge states for flexural waves in thin plates. Phys Rev B 2013;87:115143.

37. Lera N, Torrent D, San-jose P, Christensen J, Alvarez JV. Valley hall phases in kagome lattices. Phys Rev B 2019;99:134102.

38. Chaunsali R, Chen C, Yang J. Subwavelength and directional control of flexural waves in zone-folding induced topological plates. Phys Rev B 2018;97:054307.

39. Lu J, Qiu C, Ye L, et al. Observation of topological valley transport of sound in sonic crystals. Nat Phys 2017;13:369-74.

40. Wang H, Guo G, Jiang J. Band topology in classical waves: wilson-loop approach to topological numbers and fragile topology. New J Phys 2019;21:093029.

41. Fukui T, Hatsugai Y, Suzuki H. Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances. J Phys Soc Jpn 2005;74:1674-7.

42. Huo SY, Chen JJ, Huang HB. Topologically protected edge states for out-of-plane and in-plane bulk elastic waves. J Phys Condens Matter 2018;30:145403.

43. He C, Ni X, Ge H, et al. Acoustic topological insulator and robust one-way sound transport. Nat Phys 2016;12:1124-9.

44. Zhai Z, Wu L, Jiang H. Mechanical metamaterials based on origami and kirigami. Appl Phys Rev 2021;8:041319.

45. Wu W, Hu W, Qian G, Liao H, Xu X, Berto F. Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: a review. Mater Des 2019;180:107950.

46. Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 2014;344:1373-7.

47. Ingrole A, Hao A, Liang R. Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement. Mater Des 2017;117:72-83.

48. Molesky S, Lin Z, Piggott AY, Jin W, Vucković J, Rodriguez AW. Inverse design in nanophotonics. Nat Photon 2018;12:659-70.

49. Goldberg DE, Holland JH. Genetic algorithms and machine learning. Mach Learn 1988;3:95-9.

50. Zhao Y, Cao X, Gao J, et al. Broadband diffusion metasurface based on a single anisotropic element and optimized by the simulated annealing algorithm. Sci Rep 2016;6:23896.

51. Robinson J, Rahmat-Samii Y. Particle swarm optimization in electromagnetics. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag 2004;52:397-407.

52. Greener JG, Kandathil SM, Moffat L, Jones DT. A guide to machine learning for biologists. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2022;23:40-55.

53. Fischer T, Krauss C. Deep learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions. Eur J Oper Res 2018;270:654-69.

54. Li W, Chen P, Xiong B, et al. Deep learning modeling strategy for material science: from natural materials to metamaterials. J Phys Mater 2022;5:014003.

55. Goh GB, Hodas NO, Vishnu A. deep learning for computational chemistry. J Comput Chem 2017;38:1291-307.

56. Oishi A, Yagawa G. Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2017;327:327-51.

57. Yao K, Unni R, Zheng Y. Intelligent nanophotonics: merging photonics and artificial intelligence at the nanoscale. Nanophotonics 2019;8:339-66.

58. Ma W, Liu Z, Kudyshev ZA, Boltasseva A, Cai W, Liu Y. Deep learning for the design of photonic structures. Nat Photonics 2021;15:77-90.

59. Jiang J, Chen M, Fan JA. Deep neural networks for the evaluation and design of photonic devices. Nat Rev Mater 2021;6:679-700.

60. Wang N, Yan W, Qu Y, Ma S, Li SZ, Qiu M. Intelligent designs in nanophotonics: from optimization towards inverse creation. PhotoniX 2021;2:22.

61. Piccinotti D, MacDonald KF, A Gregory S, Youngs I, Zheludev NI. Artificial intelligence for photonics and photonic materials. Rep Prog Phys 2021;84:012401.

62. Chen J, Hu S, Zhu S, Li T. Metamaterials: from fundamental physics to intelligent design. Interdiscip Mater 2023;2:5-29.

63. Zhang Q, Yu H, Barbiero M, Wang B, Gu M. Artificial neural networks enabled by nanophotonics. Light Sci Appl 2019;8:42.

64. Xu Y, Zhang X, Fu Y, Liu Y. Interfacing photonics with artificial intelligence: an innovative design strategy for photonic structures and devices based on artificial neural networks. Photon Res 2021;9:B135.

65. Wiecha PR, Arbouet A, Girard C, Muskens OL. Deep learning in nano-photonics: inverse design and beyond. Photon Res 2021;9:B182.

66. So S, Badloe T, Noh J, Bravo-abad J, Rho J. Deep learning enabled inverse design in nanophotonics. Nanophotonics 2020;9:1041-57.

67. Khatib O, Ren S, Malof J, Padilla WJ. Deep learning the electromagnetic properties of metamaterials - a comprehensive review. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2101748.

68. Jiao P, Alavi AH. Artificial intelligence-enabled smart mechanical metamaterials: advent and future trends. Int Mater Rev 2021;66:365-93.

69. Jin Y, He L, Wen Z, et al. Intelligent on-demand design of phononic metamaterials. Nanophotonics 2022;11:439-60.

70. Kennedy J, Lim C. Machine learning and deep learning in phononic crystals and metamaterials - a review. Mater Today Commun 2022;33:104606.

71. Liu C, Yu G. Deep learning for the design of phononic crystals and elastic metamaterials. J Computat Des Eng 2023;10:602-14.

72. Russell S, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, 4th US ed. Prentice Hall 2009. Available from: http://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/index.html [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

73. Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 2015;349:255-60.

74. Mcculloch WS, Pitts W. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 1943;5:115-33.

75. ROSENBLATT F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 1958;65:386-408.

76. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986;323:533-6.

77. Elman J. Finding structure in time. Cogn Sci 1990;14:179-211.

78. LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proc IEEE 1998;86:2278-324.

79. Hinton GE, Osindero S, Teh YW. A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets. Neural Comput 2006;18:1527-54.

80. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. In: Ghahramani Z, Welling M, Cortes C, Lawrence ND, Weinberger KQ editors. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems; 2014 Dec 8-13; Montreal, Canada. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2014. pp. 2672-80. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2969033.2969125 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

81. Mirza M, Osindero S. Conditional generative adversarial nets. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1784 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

82. Liu D, Tan Y, Khoram E, Yu Z. Training deep neural networks for the inverse design of nanophotonic structures. ACS Photonics 2018;5:1365-9.

83. Kaelbling LP, Littman ML, Moore AW. Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artif Intell Res 1996;4:237-85. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9605103 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

84. Silver D, Schrittwieser J, Simonyan K, et al. Mastering the game of go without human knowledge. Nature 2017;550:354-9.

85. Kiran BR, Sobh I, Talpaert V, et al. Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: a survey. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst 2022;23:4909-26.

86. Zhu R, Qiu T, Wang J, et al. Phase-to-pattern inverse design paradigm for fast realization of functional metasurfaces via transfer learning. Nat Commun 2021;12:2974.

87. Kim Y, Kim Y, Yang C, Park K, Gu GX, Ryu S. Deep learning framework for material design space exploration using active transfer learning and data augmentation. NPJ Comput Mater 2021;140:7.

88. Alzubi J, Nayyar A, Kumar A. Machine learning from theory to algorithms: an overview. J Phys Conf Ser 2018;1142:012012.

89. Mahesh B. Machine learning algorithms - a review. Int J Sci Res 2020;9:381-6. Available from: https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=ART20203995 [Last accessed on 9 Oct 2023].

90. Abadi Mı, Agarwal A, Barham P, et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.04467 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

91. Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.01703 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

92. Liu CX, Yu GL. Predicting the dispersion relations of one-dimensional phononic crystals by neural networks. Sci Rep 2019;9:15322.

93. Zhang J, Li Y, Zhao T, Zhang Q, Zuo L, Zhang K. Machine-learning based design of digital materials for elastic wave control. Extreme Mech Lett 2021;48:101372.

94. Jiang W, Zhu Y, Yin G, Lu H, Xie L, Yin M. Dispersion relation prediction and structure inverse design of elastic metamaterials via deep learning. Mater Today Phys 2022;22:100616.

95. Han S, Han Q, Li C. Deep-learning-based inverse design of phononic crystals for anticipated wave attenuation. J Appl Phys 2022;132:154901.

96. Liu C, Yu G, Zhao G. Neural networks for inverse design of phononic crystals. AIP Adv 2019;9:085223.

97. Dong J, Qin Q, Xiao Y. Nelder-mead optimization of elastic metamaterials via machine-learning-aided surrogate modeling. Int J Appl Mech 2020;12:2050011.

98. Wu L, Liu L, Wang Y, et al. A machine learning-based method to design modular metamaterials. Extreme Mech Lett 2020;36:100657.

99. Li X, Ning S, Liu Z, Yan Z, Luo C, Zhuang Z. Designing phononic crystal with anticipated band gap through a deep learning based data-driven method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2020;361:112737.

100. Miao X, Dong HW, Wang Y. Deep learning of dispersion engineering in two-dimensional phononic crystals. Eng Optim 2023;55:125-39.

101. Jin Y, Zeng S, Wen Z, He L, Li Y, Li Y. Deep-subwavelength lightweight metastructures for low-frequency vibration isolation. Mater Des 2022;215:110499.

102. On S, Moon H, Yeon Park S, et al. Design of periodic arched structures integrating the structural nonlinearity and band gap effect for vibration isolation. Mater Des 2022;224:111397.

103. Luo C, Ning S, Liu Z, Zhuang Z. Interactive inverse design of layered phononic crystals based on reinforcement learning. Extreme Mech Lett 2020;36:100651.

104. Wu R, Liu T, Jahanshahi MR, Semperlotti F. Design of one-dimensional acoustic metamaterials using machine learning and cell concatenation. Struct Multidisc Optim 2021;63:2399-423.

105. He L, Guo H, Jin Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Li Y. Machine-learning-driven on-demand design of phononic beams. Sci China Phys Mech Astron 2022;65:214612.

106. Donda K, Zhu Y, Merkel A, et al. Ultrathin acoustic absorbing metasurface based on deep learning approach. Smart Mater Struct 2021;30:085003.

107. Donda K, Zhu Y, Merkel A, Wan S, Assouar B. Deep learning approach for designing acoustic absorbing metasurfaces with high degrees of freedom. Extreme Mech Lett 2022;56:101879.

108. Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhao H, Lu K, Yu D, Wen J. Accelerated topological design of metaporous materials of broadband sound absorption performance by generative adversarial networks. Mater Des 2021;207:109855.

109. Liu L, Xie L, Huang W, Zhang XJ, Lu M, Chen Y. Broadband acoustic absorbing metamaterial via deep learning approach. Appl Phys Lett 2022;120:251701.

110. Jin Y, Yang Y, Wen Z, et al. Lightweight sound-absorbing metastructures with perforated fish-belly panels. Int J Mech Sci 2022;226:107396.

111. Gu T, Wen Z, He L, et al. A lightweight metastructure for simultaneous low-frequency broadband sound absorption and vibration isolation. J Acoust Soc Am 2023;153:96.

112. Mahesh K, Kumar Ranjith S, Mini RS. Inverse design of a Helmholtz resonator based low-frequency acoustic absorber using deep neural network. J Appl Phys 2021;129:174901.

113. Mahesh K, Ranjith SK, Mini RS. A deep autoencoder based approach for the inverse design of an acoustic-absorber. Eng Comput 2023; doi: 10.1007/s00366-023-01789-9.

114. Luo YT, Li PQ, Li DT, et al. Probability-density-based deep learning paradigm for the fuzzy design of functional metastructures. Research 2020;2020:8757403.

115. Gurbuz C, Kronowetter F, Dietz C, Eser M, Schmid J, Marburg S. Generative adversarial networks for the design of acoustic metamaterials. J Acoust Soc Am 2021;149:1162.

116. Ding H, Fang X, Jia B, Wang N, Cheng Q, Li Y. Deep learning enables accurate sound redistribution via nonlocal metasurfaces. Phys Rev Appl 2021;16:064035.

117. Du Z, Mei J. Metagrating-based acoustic wavelength division multiplexing enabled by deterministic and probabilistic deep learning models. Phys Rev Res 2022;4:033165.

118. Ahmed WW, Farhat M, Zhang X, Wu Y. Deterministic and probabilistic deep learning models for inverse design of broadband acoustic cloak. Phys Rev Res 2021;3:013142.

119. Zhao T, Li Y, Zuo L, Zhang K. Machine-learning optimized method for regional control of sound fields. Extreme Mech Lett 2021;45:101297.

120. Chen J, Chen Y, Xu X, Zhou W, Huang G. A physics-guided machine learning for multifunctional wave control in active metabeams. Extreme Mech Lett 2022;55:101827.

121. Long Y, Ren J, Chen H. Unsupervised manifold clustering of topological phononics. Phys Rev Lett 2020;124:185501.

122. He L, Wen Z, Jin Y, Torrent D, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Inverse design of topological metaplates for flexural waves with machine learning. Mater Des 2021;199:109390.

123. Ogun O, Kennedy J. Inverse design of a topological phononic beam with interface modes. J Phys D Appl Phys 2022;56:015106.

124. Du Z, Ding X, Chen H, et al. Optimal design of topological waveguides by machine learning. Front Mater 2022;9:1075073.

125. Yu LW, Deng DL. Unsupervised learning of non-Hermitian topological phases. Phys Rev Lett 2021;126:240402.

126. Cheng Z, Yu Z. Supervised machine learning topological states of one-dimensional non-Hermitian systems. Chin Phys Lett 2021;38:070302.

127. Narayan B, Narayan A. Machine learning non-Hermitian topological phases. Phys Rev B 2021:103.

128. Zhang L, Tang L, Huang Z, Zhang G, Huang W, Zhang D. Machine learning topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems. Phys Rev A 2021:103.

129. Miri MA, Alù A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science 2019;363:eaar7709.

130. Reja MA, Narayan A. Characterizing exceptional points using neural networks. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00776 [Last accessed on 14 Aug 2023].

131. Gu GX, Chen C, Richmond DJ, Buehler MJ. Bioinspired hierarchical composite design using machine learning: simulation, additive manufacturing, and experiment. Mater Horiz 2018;5:939-45.

132. Hanakata PZ, Cubuk ED, Campbell DK, Park HS. Accelerated search and design of stretchable graphene kirigami using machine learning. Phys Rev Lett 2018;121:255304.

133. Hanakata PZ, Cubuk ED, Campbell DK, Park HS. Forward and inverse design of kirigami via supervised autoencoder. Phys Rev Res 2020;2:042006.

134. Kollmann HT, Abueidda DW, Koric S, Guleryuz E, Sobh NA. Deep learning for topology optimization of 2D metamaterials. Mater Des 2020;196:109098.

135. Tan RK, Zhang NL, Ye W. A deep learning - based method for the design of microstructural materials. Struct Multidisc Optim 2020;61:1417-38.

136. Garland AP, White BC, Jensen SC, Boyce BL. Pragmatic generative optimization of novel structural lattice metamaterials with machine learning. Mater Des 2021;203:109632.

137. Tian J, Tang K, Chen X, Wang X. Machine learning-based prediction and inverse design of 2D metamaterial structures with tunable deformation-dependent Poisson's ratio. Nanoscale 2022;14:12677-91.

138. Liu F, Jiang X, Wang X, Wang L. Machine learning-based design and optimization of curved beams for multistable structures and metamaterials. Extreme Mech Lett 2020;41:101002.

139. Challapalli A, Patel D, Li G. Inverse machine learning framework for optimizing lightweight metamaterials. Mater Des 2021;208:109937.

140. Wang Y, Zeng Q, Wang J, Li Y, Fang D. Inverse design of shell-based mechanical metamaterial with customized loading curves based on machine learning and genetic algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2022;401:115571.

141. Chang Y, Wang H, Dong Q. Machine learning-based inverse design of auxetic metamaterial with zero Poisson's ratio. Mater Today Commun 2022;30:103186.

Cite This Article

Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS

OAE Style

He L, Li Y, Torrent D, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Jin Y. Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review. Microstructures 2023;3:2023037. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.29

AMA Style

He L, Li Y, Torrent D, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T, Jin Y. Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review. Microstructures. 2023; 3(4): 2023037. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.29

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Liangshu, Yan Li, Daniel Torrent, Xiaoying Zhuang, Timon Rabczuk, Yabin Jin. 2023. "Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review" Microstructures. 3, no.4: 2023037. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.29

ACS Style

He, L.; Li Y.; Torrent D.; Zhuang X.; Rabczuk T.; Jin Y. Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review. Microstructures. 2023, 3, 2023037. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/microstructures.2023.29

About This Article

Special Issue

This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning for Microstructures and Materials
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Data & Comments

Data

Views
475
Downloads
112
Citations
2
Comments
0
0

Comments

Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.

0
Download PDF
Cite This Article 8 clicks
Like This Article 0 likes
Share This Article
Scan the QR code for reading!
See Updates
Contents
Figures
Related
Microstructures
ISSN 2770-2995 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/