REFERENCES
1. Anisimov, V. I.; Zaanen, J.; Andersen, O. K. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I. Phys. Rev. B. 1991, 44, 943.
2. Cococcioni, M.; de Gironcoli, S. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA + U method. Phys. Rev. B. 2005, 71, 035105.
3. Jain, A.; Hautier, G.; Ong, S. P.; et al. Formation enthalpies by mixing GGA and GGA + U calculations. Phys. Rev. B. 2011, 84, 045115.
4. Spagnoli, D.; Refson, K.; Wright, K.; Gale, J. D. Density functional theory study of the relative stability of the iron disulfide polymorphs pyrite and marcasite. Phys. Rev. B. 2010, 81, 094106.
5. Long, O. Y.; Sai Gautam, G.; Carter, E. A. Evaluating optimal U for 3d transition-metal oxides within the SCAN+U framework. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2020, 4, 045401.
6. Kam, R. L.; Binci, L.; Kaplan, A. D.; Persson, K. A.; Marzari, N.; Ceder, G. Interplay between electron localization, magnetic order, and Jahn-Teller distortion dictates LiMnO2 phase stability. Phys. Rev. B. 2025, 111, 245132.
7. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL. Mater. 2013, 1, 011002.
8. Horton, M. K.; Huck, P.; Yang, R. X.; et al. Accelerated data-driven materials science with the Materials Project. Nat. Mater. 2025, 24, 1522-32.
9. Schmidt, J.; Wang, H. C.; Cerqueira, T. F. T.; Botti, S.; Marques, M. A. L. A dataset of 175k stable and metastable materials calculated with the PBEsol and SCAN functionals. Sci. Data. 2022, 9, 64.
10. Schmidt, J.; Hoffmann, N.; Wang, H. C.; et al. Machine-learning-assisted determination of the global zero-temperature phase diagram of materials. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2210788.
11. Barros-Luque, L.; Shuaibi, M.; Fu, X.; et al. The Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) inorganic materials dataset and models. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2026, 6, 642-52.
12. Zhou, F.; Cococcioni, M.; Marianetti, C. A.; Morgan, D.; Ceder, G. First-principles prediction of redox potentials in transition-metal compounds with LDA + U. Phys. Rev. B. 2004, 70, 235121.
13. Warford, T.; Thiemann, F. L.; Csányi, G. Better without U: impact of selective Hubbard U correction on foundational MLIPs. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 2026, 7, 035033.
14. Wang, R.; Gao, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhong, Z. Pre-training, fine-tuning, and distillation (PFD): automatically generating machine learning force fields from universal models. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2025, 9, 113802.
15. Zhang, D.; Peng, A.; Cai, C.; et al. A graph neural network for the era of large atomistic models. npj. Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 276.
16. Li, T.; Li, W.; Peng, A.; et al. DPA4: pushing the accuracy-cost frontier of interatomic potentials with EMFA SO(2) convolution. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2606.02419. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.02419. (accessed 2026-10-21).
17. Kresse, G.; Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B. 1993, 47, 558.
18. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 1996, 6, 15-50.
19. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996, 54, 11169.
20. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999, 59, 1758.
21. Ong, S. P.; Richards, W. D.; Jain, A.; et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 68, 314-9.
22. Dudarev, S. L.; Botton, G. A.; Savrasov, S. Y.; Humphreys, C. J.; Sutton, A. P. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: an LSDA+U study. Phys. Rev. B. 1998, 57, 1505.
23. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.
24. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple [Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)]. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 1396.
25. Furness, J. W.; Kaplan, A. D.; Ning, J.; Perdew, J. P.; Sun, J. Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8208-15.
26. Krukau, A. V.; Vydrov, O. A.; Izmaylov, A. F.; Scuseria, G. E. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 224106.
27. QUESTS 2024.06.21 documentation. github.io. https://dskoda.github.io/quests/. (accessed 2026-10-21).
28. Schwalbe-Koda, D.; Hamel, S.; Sadigh, B.; Zhou, F.; Lordi, V. Model-free estimation of completeness, uncertainties, and outliers in atomistic machine learning using information theory. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4014.
29. Zhang, D.; Peng, A.; Cai, C. DPA-3.1-3M model. AIS Square model repository. https://www.aissquare.com/models/detail?pageType=models&name=DPA-3.1-3M&id=343. (accessed 2026-10-21).
30. Zeng, J.; Zhang, D.; Peng, A.; et al. DeePMD-kit v3: a multiple-backend framework for machine learning potentials. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2025, 21, 4375-85.
31. Kaplan, A. D.; Liu, R.; Qi, J.; et al. A foundational potential energy surface dataset for materials. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.04070. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.04070. (accessed 2026-10-21).
32. Kuner, M. C.; Kaplan, A. D.; Persson, K. A.; Asta, M.; Chrzan, D. C. MP-ALOE: an r2SCAN dataset for universal machine learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 352.
33. Shinagawa, C.; Takamoto, S.; Shintani, D.; et al. Matlantis-PFP v8: universal machine learning interatomic potential with better experimental agreements via r2SCAN functional. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.11063. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.11063. (accessed 2026-10-21).
