REFERENCES

1. Becke, A. D.; Edgecombe, K. E. A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397-403.

2. Silvi, B.; Savin, A. Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 1994, 371, 683-6.

3. Savin, A.; Nesper, R.; Wengert, S.; Fässler, T. F. ELF: the electron localization function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1808-32.

4. Hilleke, K. P.; Bi, T.; Zurek, E. Materials under high pressure: a chemical perspective. Appl. Phys. A. 2022, 128, 441.

5. Ashcroft, N. W. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: high temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 187002.

6. Drozdov, A. P.; Eremets, M. I.; Troyan, I. A.; Ksenofontov, V.; Shylin, S. I. Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system. Nature 2015, 525, 73-6.

7. Duan, D.; Liu, Y.; Tian, F.; et al. Pressure-induced metallization of dense (H₂S)₂H₂ with high-T_c superconductivity. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6968.

8. Li, Y.; Hao, J.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Ma, Y. The metallization and superconductivity of dense hydrogen sulfide. J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 140, 174712.

9. Drozdov, A. P.; Kong, P. P.; Minkov, V. S.; et al. Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures. Nature 2019, 569, 528-31.

10. Somayazulu, M.; Ahart, M.; Mishra, A. K.; et al. Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2019, 122, 027001.

11. Errea, I.; Belli, F.; Monacelli, L.; et al. Quantum crystal structure in the 250-kelvin superconducting lanthanum hydride. Nature 2020, 578, 66-9.

12. Wang, H.; Tse, J. S.; Tanaka, K.; Iitaka, T.; Ma, Y. Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 6463-6.

13. Peng, F.; Sun, Y.; Pickard, C. J.; Needs, R. J.; Wu, Q.; Ma, Y. Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: possible route to room-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 107001.

14. Ma, L.; Wang, K.; Xie, Y.; et al. High-temperature superconducting phase in clathrate calcium hydride CaH₆ up to 215 K at a Pressure of 172 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 167001.

15. Li, Z.; He, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. Superconductivity above 200 K discovered in superhydrides of calcium. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2863.

16. Bi, J.; Nakamoto, Y.; Zhang, P.; et al. Giant enhancement of superconducting critical temperature in substitutional alloy (La,Ce)H₉. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5952.

17. Chen, W.; Huang, X.; Semenok, D. V.; et al. Enhancement of superconducting properties in the La-Ce-H system at moderate pressures. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2660.

18. Chen, L. C.; Luo, T.; Cao, Z. Y.; et al. Synthesis and superconductivity in yttrium-cerium hydrides at high pressures. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1809.

19. Shan, P.; Ma, L.; Yang, X.; et al. Molecular hydride superconductor BiH₄ with T_c up to 91 K at 170 GPa. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 4375-81.

20. Liu, P.; Zhuang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Cui, T.; Liu, Z. Mechanism of high-temperature superconductivity in compressed H₂-molecular-type hydride. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadt9411.

21. Zhao, W.; Ellis, A.; Duan, D.; et al. Unlocking the origin of high‐temperature superconductivity in molecular hydrides at moderate pressures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2415910.

22. Sun, Y.; Miao, M. Chemical templates that assemble the metal superhydrides. Chem 2023, 9, 443-59.

23. Belli, F.; Novoa, T.; Contreras-García, J.; Errea, I. Strong correlation between electronic bonding network and critical temperature in hydrogen-based superconductors. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5381.

24. Sun, Y.; Ellis, A.; Chen, X.; Miao, M. Batch discovery of complex metal superhydrides via an effective machine learning method structured by chemical template concept. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 40407-19.

25. Glass, C. W.; Oganov, A. R.; Hansen, N. USPEX - evolutionary crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2006, 175, 713-20.

26. Wang, Y.; Lv, J.; Zhu, L.; Ma, Y. Crystal structure prediction via particle-swarm optimization. Phys. Rev. B. 2010, 82, 094116.

27. Merchant, A.; Batzner, S.; Schoenholz, S. S.; Aykol, M.; Cheon, G.; Cubuk, E. D. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature 2023, 624, 80-5.

28. Zeni, C.; Pinsler, R.; Zügner, D.; et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 2025, 639, 624-32.

29. Hessmann, S. S. P.; Schütt, K. T.; Gebauer, N. W. A.; Gastegger, M.; Oguchi, T.; Yamashita, T. Accelerating crystal structure search through active learning with neural networks for rapid relaxations. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 44.

30. Kulichenko, M.; Barros, K.; Lubbers, N.; et al. Uncertainty-driven dynamics for active learning of interatomic potentials. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2023, 3, 230-9.

31. Conway, L. J.; Pickard, C. J. Accelerating crystal structure prediction using data‐derived potentials: high‐pressure binary hydrides. Ann. Phys. 2026, 538, e00608.

32. Jørgensen, P. B.; Bhowmik, A. Equivariant graph neural networks for fast electron density estimation of molecules, liquids, and solids. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 183.

33. Lv, T.; Zhong, Z.; Liang, Y.; Li, F.; Huang, J.; Zheng, R. Deep charge: deep learning model of electron density from a one-shot density functional theory calculation. Phys. Rev. B. 2023, 108, 235159.

34. Koker, T.; Quigley, K.; Taw, E.; Tibbetts, K.; Li, L. Higher-order equivariant neural networks for charge density prediction in materials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 161.

35. Qin, X.; Lv, T.; Zhong, Z. EAC-Net: predicting real-space charge density via equivariant atomic contributions. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2026, 22, 4813-21.

36. Li, C.; Sharir, O.; Yuan, S.; Chan, G. K. Image super-resolution inspired electron density prediction. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4811.

37. Wang, Z.; Gong, Y.; Evans, M. L.; et al. Machine learning-accelerated discovery of A₂BC₂ ternary electrides with diverse anionic electron densities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 26412-24.

38. Dewaele, A.; Worth, N.; Pickard, C. J.; et al. Synthesis and stability of xenon oxides Xe₂O₅ and Xe₃O₂ under pressure. Nat. Chem. 2016, 8, 784-90.

39. Dong, X.; Oganov, A. R.; Goncharov, A. F.; et al. A stable compound of helium and sodium at high pressure. Nat. Chem. 2017, 9, 440-5.

40. Kaplan, A. D.; Liu, R.; Qi, J.; et al. A foundational potential energy surface dataset for materials. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.04070. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.04070. (accessed 2026-08-20).

41. Kuner, M. C.; Kaplan, A. D.; Persson, K. A.; Asta, M.; Chrzan, D. C. MP-ALOE: an r²SCAN dataset for universal machine learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 352.

42. Deng, B.; Zhong, P.; Jun, K.; et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023, 5, 1031-41.

43. Barros-Luque, L.; Shuaibi, M.; Fu, X.; et al. The Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) inorganic materials dataset and models. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2026, 6, 642-52.

44. Chen, C.; Ong, S. P. A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2022, 2, 718-28.

45. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. DPA-2: a large atomic model as a multi-task learner. NPJ. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 293.

46. Batzner, S.; Musaelian, A.; Sun, L.; et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2453.

47. Musaelian, A.; Batzner, S.; Johansson, A.; et al. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 579.

48. Batatia, I.; Kovács, D. P.; Simm, G. N. C.; Ortner, C.; Csányi, G. MACE: higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2206.07697. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.07697. (accessed 2026-08-20).

49. Batatia, I.; Benner, P.; Chiang, Y.; et al. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 163, 184110.

50. Lysogorskiy, Y.; Bochkarev, A.; Drautz, R. Graph atomic cluster expansion for foundational machine learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 114.

51. Barlow, R. E.; Bartholomew, D. J.; Bremner, J. M.; Brunk, H. D. Statistical inference under order restrictions. The theory and application of isotonic regression. John Wiley & Sons: London and New York, 1972. https://books.google.com/books/about/Statistical_Inference_Under_Order_Restri.html?id=DEamySUDBWcC&utm_source. (accessed 2026-08-20).

52. Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, A1133.

53. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865.

54. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 1996, 54, 11169.

55. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1994, 50, 17953.

56. Kresse, G.; Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 1999, 59, 1758.

57. Furness, J. W.; Kaplan, A. D.; Ning, J.; Perdew, J. P.; Sun, J. Accurate and numerically efficient r²SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020, 11, 8208-15.

58. Hirshfeld, F. L. Bonded-atom fragments for describing molecular charge densities. Theoret. Chim. Acta. 1977, 44, 129-38.

59. He, K.; Zhang, X.; Ren, S.; Sun, J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, USA. Jun 27-30, 2016. IEEE; 2016. pp 770-8.

60. Wu, Y.; He, K. Group normalization. In Ferrari, V.; Hebert, M.; Sminchisescu, C.; Weiss, Y.; editors. Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 3-19.

61. Hendrycks, D.; Gimpel, K. Gaussian error linear units (GELUs). arXiv 2016, arXiv:1606.08415. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1606.08415. (accessed 2026-08-20).

62. Hu, J.; Shen, L.; Sun, G. Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA. Jun 18-23, 2018. IEEE; 2018. pp 7132-41.

63. Woo, S.; Park, J.; Lee, J. Y.; Kweon, I. S. CBAM: convolutional block attention Module. In: Ferrari, V.; Hebert, M.; Sminchisescu, C.; Weiss, Y.; editors. Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 3-19.

64. Cipolla, R.; Gal, Y.; Kendall, A. Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA. Jun 18-23, 2018. IEEE; 2018. pp. 7482-91.

65. Reents, T.; Cantarella, A.; Bercx, M.; Bonfà, P.; Pizzi, G. Score-based diffusion models for accurate crystal-structure inpainting and reconstruction of hydrogen positions. npj. Comput. Mater. 2026, 12, 203.