REFERENCES
1. Liu, Z. Thermodynamics and its prediction and CALPHAD modeling: review, state of the art, and perspectives. Calphad 2023, 82, 102580.
2. Arróyave, R. Phase stability through machine learning. J. Phase. Equilib. Diffus. 2022, 43, 606-28.
3. Chew, P. Y.; Reinhardt, A. Phase diagrams-Why they matter and how to predict them. J. Chem. Phys. 2023, 158, 030902.
4. Shen, C. The synergy of machine learning and CALPHAD: revitalizing traditional approaches. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2025, 258, 113970.
5. Kruglov, I. A.; Yanilkin, A.; Oganov, A. R.; Korotaev, P. Phase diagram of uranium from ab initio calculations and machine learning. Phys. Rev. B. 2019, 100, 174104.
6. Rosenbrock, C. W.; Gubaev, K.; Shapeev, A. V.; et al. Machine-learned interatomic potentials for alloys and alloy phase diagrams. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 477.
7. Zhu, S.; Sarıtürk, D.; Arróyave, R. Accelerating CALPHAD-based phase diagram predictions in complex alloys using universal machine learning potentials: opportunities and challenges. Acta. Mater. 2025, 286, 120747.
8. Xie, J. Z.; Zhou, X. Y.; Jin, B.; Jiang, H. Machine learning force field-aided cluster expansion approach to phase diagram of alloyed materials. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2024, 20, 6207-17.
9. Bocklund, B.; Otis, R.; Egorov, A.; Obaied, A.; Roslyakova, I.; Liu, Z. ESPEI for efficient thermodynamic database development, modification, and uncertainty quantification: application to Cu–Mg. MRS. Commun. 2019, 9, 618-27.
10. Zhang, H.; Wu, B.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Efficient thermodynamic modelling with uncertainty quantification of the Ag–Cu–Co system from its sub-binary systems. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 308, 128276.
11. Deffrennes, G.; Hallstedt, B.; Abe, T.; et al. Data-driven study of the enthalpy of mixing in the liquid phase. Calphad 2024, 87, 102745.
12. Wu, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Estimating the temperature dependent zero-phase-fraction features in ternary phase diagram via Bayesian approach. Scripta. Mater. 2023, 235, 115615.
13. Lund, J.; Wang, H.; Braatz, R. D.; García, R. E. Machine learning of phase diagrams. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 8485-97.
14. Deffrennes, G.; Terayama, K.; Abe, T.; Tamura, R. A machine learning–based classification approach for phase diagram prediction. Mater. Design. 2022, 215, 110497.
15. He, J.; Su, X.; Wang, C.; et al. Machine learning assisted predictions of multi-component phase diagrams and fine boundary information. Acta. Mater. 2022, 240, 118341.
16. Terayama, K.; Han, K.; Katsube, R.; et al. Acceleration of phase diagram construction by machine learning incorporating Gibbs’ phase rule. Scripta. Mater. 2022, 208, 114335.
17. Li, H.; Xu, G.; Chen, F.; et al. Estimating phase boundaries using sampling and machine learning of derivatives of thermochemistry properties. Calphad 2026, 92, 102920.
18. Hao, L.; Ruban, A.; Xiong, W. CALPHAD modeling based on Gibbs energy functions from zero kevin and improved magnetic model: a case study on the Cr–Ni system. Calphad 2021, 73, 102268.
19. Liu, Z. K.; Wang, Y. Computational thermodynamics of materials. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2016.
20. Koizumi, A.; Deffrennes, G.; Terayama, K.; Tamura, R. Performance of uncertainty-based active learning for efficient approximation of black-box functions in materials science. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 27019.
21. Terayama, K.; Tamura, R.; Nose, Y.; et al. Efficient construction method for phase diagrams using uncertainty sampling. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2019, 3, 033802.
22. Wu, B.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, H. Uncertainty quantification of phase boundary in a composition-phase map via Bayesian strategies. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2023, 7, 025201.
23. Liu, P.; Yu, H.; Qin, H.; et al. Construction of material phase diagram using different uncertainty estimation strategies. Mater. Lett. 2025, 384, 138036.
24. Varivoda, D.; Dong, R.; Omee, S. S.; Hu, J. Materials property prediction with uncertainty quantification: a benchmark study. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2023, 10, 021409.
25. Tian, Y.; Yuan, R.; Xue, D.; et al. Role of uncertainty estimation in accelerating materials development via active learning. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 128, 014103.
26. Tian, Y.; Yuan, R.; Xue, D.; et al. Determining multi-component phase diagrams with desired characteristics using active learning. Adv. Sci. 2020, 8, 2003165.
27. Dai, C.; Glotzer, S. C. Efficient phase diagram sampling by active learning. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2020, 124, 1275-84.
28. Lookman, T.; Balachandran, P. V.; Xue, D.; Yuan, R. Active learning in materials science with emphasis on adaptive sampling using uncertainties for targeted design. npj. Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 153.
29. Kanopoulos, N.; Vasanthavada, N.; Baker, R. Design of an image edge detection filter using the Sobel operator. IEEE. J. Solid. State. Circuits. , 23, 358-67.
30. Turchi, P. E. A.; Drchal, V.; Kudrnovský, J. Stability and ordering properties of fcc alloys based on Rh, Ir, Pd, and Pt. Phys. Rev. B. 2006, 74, 064202.
31. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Tang, C.; Liu, L.; Zhou, H.; Jin, Z. Thermodynamic description of the Au–Ag–Ge ternary system. Thermochim. Acta. 2011, 512, 240-6.
32. Deringer, V. L.; Bartók, A. P.; Bernstein, N.; Wilkins, D. M.; Ceriotti, M.; Csányi, G. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10073-141.
33. Rumelhart, D. E.; Hinton, G. E.; Williams, R. J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 1986, 323, 533-6.
34. Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Yan, C. A multi-candidate batch mode active learning approach. In Proceedings of the 2023 15th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing. Association for Computing Machinery; 2023. pp 528-33.
35. Yacouby, R.; Axman, D. Probabilistic extension of Precision, Recall, and F1 score for more thorough evaluation of classification models. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2020. pp 79-91.
36. Heese, R.; Schmid, J.; Walczak, M.; Bortz, M. Calibrated simplex-mapping classification. PLoS. One. 2023, 18, e0279876.
37. Krajewski, A. M.; Beese, A. M.; Reinhart, W. F.; Liu, Z. Efficient generation of grids and traversal graphs in compositional spaces towards exploration and path planning. npj. Unconv. Comput. 2024, 1, 12.
38. Greenacre, M.; Grunsky, E.; Bacon-Shone, J.; Erb, I.; Quinn, T. Aitchison’s compositional data analysis 40 years on: a reappraisal. Statist. Sci. 2023, 38, 386-410.
