REFERENCES

1. Gao, X.; Tan, R.; Li, G. Research on text mining of material science based on natural language processing. IOP. Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 768, 072094.

2. Li, Y.; Gupta, V.; Kilic, M. N. T.; et al. Hybrid-LLM-GNN: integrating large language models and graph neural networks for enhanced materials property prediction. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 376-83.

3. Olivetti, E. A.; Cole, J. M.; Kim, E.; et al. Data-driven materials research enabled by natural language processing and information extraction. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2020, 7, 041317.

4. Reiser, P.; Neubert, M.; Eberhard, A.; et al. Graph neural networks for materials science and chemistry. Commun. Mater. 2022, 3, 93.

5. Venugopal, V.; Sahoo, S.; Zaki, M.; Agarwal, M.; Gosvami, N. N.; Krishnan, N. M. A. Looking through glass: knowledge discovery from materials science literature using natural language processing. Patterns 2021, 2, 100290.

6. Yoshitake, M.; Sato, F.; Kawano, H.; Teraoka, H. MaterialBERT for natural language processing of materials science texts. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. Methods. 2022, 2, 372-80.

7. Kim, K.; Kang, S.; Yoo, J.; et al. Deep-learning-based inverse design model for intelligent discovery of organic molecules. npj. Comput. Mater. 2018, 4, 67.

8. Liu, Z.; Zhu, D.; Rodrigues, S. P.; Lee, K.; Cai, W. Generative model for the inverse design of metasurfaces. Nano. Lett. 2018, 18, 6570-6.

9. Curtarolo, S.; Hart, G. L. W.; Nardelli, M. B.; Mingo, N.; Sanvito, S.; Levy, O. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 2013, 12, 191-201.

10. Hachmann, J.; Olivares-Amaya, R.; Atahan-Evrenk, S.; et al. The Harvard Clean Energy Project: large-scale computational screening and design of organic photovoltaics on the world community grid. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2241-51.

11. Kanal, I. Y.; Owens, S. G.; Bechtel, J. S.; Hutchison, G. R. Efficient computational screening of organic polymer photovoltaics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 1613-23.

12. Ansari, M.; Moosavi, S. M. Agent-based learning of materials datasets from the scientific literature. Digit. Discov. 2024, 3, 2607-17.

13. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. Rapid and automated alloy design with graph neural network-powered large language model-driven multi-agent AI. MRS. Bull. 2025, 50, 1309-24.

14. Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Hou, Z.; Miret, S.; Liu, B. HoneyComb: a flexible LLM-based agent system for materials science. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, 2024 Oct; Miami, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2024. pp. 3369-82.

15. Bazgir, A.; Praneeth Madugula, R.; Zhang, Y. Multicrossmodal automated agent for integrating diverse materials science data. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.15132. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.15132. (accessed 2026-05-19).

16. Zhou, L.; Ling, H.; Yan, K.; et al. Toward greater autonomy in materials discovery agents: unifying planning, physics, and scientists. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.05616. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.05616. (accessed 2026-05-19).

17. Boiko, D. A.; Macknight, R.; Kline, B.; Gomes, G. Autonomous chemical research with large language models. Nature 2023, 624, 570-8.

18. Szymanski, N. J.; Rendy, B.; Fei, Y.; et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of inorganic materials. Nature 2023, 624, 86-91.

19. Zhang, Y.; Khan, S. A.; Mahmud, A.; et al. Exploring the role of large language models in the scientific method: from hypothesis to discovery. npj. Artif. Intell. 2025, 1, 14.

20. SAE Standard. J3016_202104 - Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. 2021.

21. Schilling-Wilhelmi, M.; Ríos-García, M.; Shabih, S.; et al. From text to insight: large language models for chemical data extraction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2025, 54, 1125-50.

22. Ramos, M. C.; Collison, C. J.; White, A. D. A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 2514-72.

23. Wei, J.; Wang, X.; Schuurmans, D.; et al. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2201.11903. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903. (accessed 2026-05-19).

24. Zhang, Z.; Dai, Q.; Bo, X.; et al. A survey on the memory mechanism of large language model-based agents. ACM. Trans. Inf. Syst. 2025, 43, 1-47.

25. Sim, M.; Vakili, M. G.; Strieth-Kalthoff, F.; et al. ChemOS 2.0: an orchestration architecture for chemical self-driving laboratories. Matter 2024, 7, 2959-77.

26. Schmidgall, S.; Su, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Agent laboratory: using LLM agents as research assistants. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2501.04227. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.04227. (accessed 2026-05-19).

27. Kapoor, S.; Stroebl, B.; Siegel, Z. S.; Nadgir, N.; Narayanan, A. AI agents that matter. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.01502. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.01502. (accessed 2026-05-19).

28. Lu, C.; Lu, C.; Lange, R. T.; Foerster, J. N.; Clune, J.; Ha, D. The AI scientist: towards fully automated open-ended scientific discovery. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.06292. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.06292. (accessed 2026-05-19).

29. Szymanski, N. J.; Bartel, C. J.; Zeng, Y.; Diallo, M.; Kim, H.; Ceder, G. Adaptively driven X-ray diffraction guided by machine learning for autonomous phase identification. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 31.

30. Kumbhar, S.; Mishra, V.; Coutinho, K.; Handa, D.; Iquebal, A.; Baral, C. Hypothesis generation for materials discovery and design using goal-driven and constraint-guided LLM agents. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, 2025 Mar; Albuquerque, New Mexico. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2025. pp. 7524-55.

31. Shi, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Knowledge-driven autonomous materials research via collaborative multi-agent and robotic system. Matter 2026, 9, 102577.

32. Pyzer-Knapp, E. O.; Manica, M.; Staar, P.; et al. Foundation models for materials discovery - current state and future directions. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 61.

33. Mishra, V.; Singh, S.; Ahlawat, D.; et al. Foundational large language models for materials research. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.09560. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.09560. (accessed 2026-05-19).

34. Choi, J.; Nam, G.; Choi, J.; Jung, Y. A perspective on foundation models in chemistry. JACS. Au. 2025, 5, 1499-518.

35. Van, M. H.; Verma, P.; Zhao, C.; Wu, X. A survey of AI for materials science: foundation models, LLM agents, datasets, and tools. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.20743. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.20743. (accessed 2026-05-19).

36. Li, C.; Ran, N.; Liu, J. Agentic material science. J. Mater. Inf. 2026, 6, 10.

37. Tom, G.; Schmid, S. P.; Baird, S. G.; et al. Self-driving laboratories for chemistry and materials science. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 9633-732.

38. Anstine, D. M.; Isayev, O. Generative models as an emerging paradigm in the chemical sciences. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 8736-50.

39. Bran, A. M.; Cox, S.; Schilter, O.; Baldassari, C.; White, A. D.; Schwaller, P. Augmenting large language models with chemistry tools. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2024, 6, 525-35.

40. Gupta, T.; Zaki, M.; Krishnan, N. M. A.; Mausam. MatSciBERT: a materials domain language model for text mining and information extraction. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 102.

41. Trewartha, A.; Walker, N.; Huo, H.; et al. Quantifying the advantage of domain-specific pre-training on named entity recognition tasks in materials science. Patterns 2022, 3, 100488.

42. Liu, Y.; Ott, M.; Goyal, N.; et al. RoBERTa: a robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1907.11692. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.11692. (accessed 2026-05-19).

43. Niyongabo Rubungo, A.; Arnold, C.; Rand, B. P.; Dieng, A. B. LLM-Prop: predicting the properties of crystalline materials using large language models. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 186.

44. Yu, B.; Baker, F. N.; Chen, Z.; Ning, X.; Sun, H. LlaSMol: advancing large language models for chemistry with a large-scale, comprehensive, high-quality instruction tuning dataset. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.09391. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.09391. (accessed 2026-05-19).

45. Qiu, H.; Zhao, J.; Jing, E.; et al. Introducing PolySea: an LLM-based polymer smart evolution agent. ChemRxiv 2025.

46. Tian, S.; Jiang, X.; Wang, W.; et al. Steel design based on a large language model. Acta. Mater. 2025, 285, 120663.

47. Yang, Z.; Lv, K.; Shu, J.; Li, Z.; Xiao, P. Incorporating molecular knowledge in large language models via multimodal modeling. IEEE. Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 2025, 12, 3660-70.

48. Zholus, A.; Kuznetsov, M.; Schutski, R.; et al. BindGPT: a scalable framework for 3D molecular design via language modeling and reinforcement learning. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.03686. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.03686. (accessed 2026-05-19).

49. Tan, Q.; Zhou, D.; Xia, P.; et al. ChemMLLM: chemical multimodal large language model. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.16326. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.16326. (accessed 2026-05-19).

50. Kuenneth, C.; Ramprasad, R. polyBERT: a chemical language model to enable fully machine-driven ultrafast polymer informatics. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4099.

51. Xu, C.; Wang, Y.; Barati Farimani, A. TransPolymer: a Transformer-based language model for polymer property predictions. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 64.

52. Chaudhari, A.; Guntuboina, C.; Huang, H.; Farimani, A. B. AlloyBERT: alloy property prediction with large language models. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2024, 244, 113256.

53. Liu, X.; Sun, P.; Chen, S.; et al. Perovskite-LLM: knowledge-enhanced large language models for perovskite solar cell research. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.12669. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.12669. (accessed 2026-05-19).

54. Huang, S.; Cole, J. M. BatteryBERT: a pretrained language model for battery database enhancement. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2022, 62, 6365-77.

55. Zhao, J.; Huang, S.; Cole, J. M. OpticalBERT and OpticalTable-SQA: text- and table-based language models for the optical-materials domain. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2023, 63, 1961-81.

56. Mok, D. H.; Back, S. Generative pretrained transformer for heterogeneous catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 33712-22.

57. Tang, Y.; Xu, W.; Cao, J.; et al. MatterChat: a multi-modal LLM for material science. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.13107. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.13107. (accessed 2026-05-19).

58. Antunes, L. M.; Butler, K. T.; Grau-Crespo, R. Crystal structure generation with autoregressive large language modeling. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10570.

59. Yang, Y.; Shi, R.; Li, Z.; et al. BatGPT-Chem: a foundation large model for chemical engineering. Research 2025, 8, 0827.

60. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL. Mater. 2013, 1, 011002.

61. Talirz, L.; Kumbhar, S.; Passaro, E.; et al. Materials Cloud, a platform for open computational science. Sci. Data. 2020, 7, 299.

62. Scheidgen, M.; Himanen, L.; Ladines, A. N.; et al. NOMAD: a distributed web-based platform for managing materials science research data. J. Open. Source. Softw. 2023, 8, 5388.

63. Esters, M.; Oses, C.; Divilov, S.; et al. aflow.org: a web ecosystem of databases, software and tools. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2023, 216, 111808.

64. Venugopal, V.; Olivetti, E. MatKG: an autonomously generated knowledge graph in Material Science. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 217.

65. Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.; Liu, Z.; et al. A materials terminology knowledge graph automatically constructed from text corpus. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 600.

66. Statt, M. J.; Rohr, B. A.; Guevarra, D.; Breeden, J.; Suram, S. K.; Gregoire, J. M. The materials experiment knowledge graph. Digit. Discov. 2023, 2, 909-14.

67. MongoDB Inc. MongoDB: the world’s leading modern data platform. https://www.mongodb.com/. (accessed 2026-05-18).

68. PostgreSQL: the world’s most advanced open source relational database. https://www.postgresql.org/. (accessed 2026-05-18).

69. Elementary Multiperspective Material Ontology (EMMO). 2025. https://github.com/emmo-repo/EMMO. (accessed 2026-05-18).

70. de Sainte Marie, C.; Iglesias Escudero, M.; Rosina, P. The ONTORULE Project: where ontology meets business rules. In Web Reasoning and Rule Systems. RR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6902; Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: 2011. pp. 24-9.

71. Premkumar, V.; Krishnamurty, S.; Wileden, J. C.; Grosse, I. R. A semantic knowledge management system for laminated composites. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2014, 28, 91-101.

72. Douze, M.; Guzhva, A.; Deng, C.; et al. The Faiss library. IEEE. Trans. Big. Data. 2026, 12, 346-61.

73. Wang, J.; Yi, X.; Guo, R.; et al. Milvus: a purpose-built vector data management system. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data. Association for Computing Machinery; 2021. pp. 2614-27.

74. Qdrant. 2025. https://github.com/qdrant/qdrant. (accessed 2026-05-19).

75. Weaviate. 2025. https://github.com/weaviate/weaviate. (accessed 2026-05-19).

76. Neo4j. Graph Intelligence Platform. 2026. https://neo4j.com/. (accessed 2026-05-19).

77. Krech, D.; Grimnes, G. A.; Higgins, G.; et al. RDFLib. 2023.

78. Packer, C.; Wooders, S.; Lin, K.; et al. MemGPT: towards LLMs as operating systems. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.08560. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08560. (accessed 2026-05-19).

79. LlamaIndex. 2026. https://www.llamaindex.ai/. (accessed 2026-05-19).

80. Haystack. 2019. https://github.com/deepset-ai/haystack. (accessed 2026-05-19).

81. SerpApi: Google Search API. https://serpapi.com/. (accessed 2026-05-19).

82. LangChain. 2022. https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain. (accessed 2026-05-19).

83. Langgraph. 2025. https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph. (accessed 2026-05-19).

84. Wu, Q.; Bansal, G.; Zhang, J.; et al. AutoGen: enabling next-gen LLM applications via multi-agent conversation. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.08155. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.08155. (accessed 2026-05-19).

85. crewAI. 2025. https://github.com/crewAIInc/crewAI. (accessed 2026-05-19).

86. Yao, S.; Zhao, J.; Yu, D.; et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2210.03629. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.03629. (accessed 2026-05-19).

87. Shinn, N.; Cassano, F.; Berman, E.; Gopinath, A.; Narasimhan, K.; Yao, S. Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learning. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.11366. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.11366. (accessed 2026-05-19).

88. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Chen, W.; et al. FireWorks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high‐throughput applications. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 2015, 27, 5037-59.

89. Huber, S. P.; Zoupanos, S.; Uhrin, M.; et al. AiiDA 1.0, a scalable computational infrastructure for automated reproducible workflows and data provenance. Sci. Data. 2020, 7, 300.

90. Sundberg, J. D.; Benjamin, S. S.; Mcrae, L. M.; Warren, S. C. Simmate: a framework for materials science. J. Open. Source. Softw. 2022, 7, 4364.

91. Ward, L.; Pauloski, J. G.; Hayot-Sasson, V.; et al. Employing artificial intelligence to steer exascale workflows with colmena. Int. J. High. Perform. Comput. Appl. 2024, 39, 52-64.

92. Ong, S. P.; Richards, W. D.; Jain, A.; et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 68, 314-9.

93. Hafner, J.; Kresse, G. The Vienna AB-Initio Simulation Program VASP: an efficient and versatile tool for studying the structural, dynamic, and electronic properties of materials. In: Gonis, A.; Meike, A.; Turchi, P. E. A.; Editors. Properties of Complex Inorganic Solids. Springer US; 1997. pp. 69-82.

94. Giannozzi, P.; Baroni, S.; Bonini, N.; et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2009, 21, 395502.

95. Gonze, X.; Amadon, B.; Anglade, P.; et al. ABINIT: first-principles approach to material and nanosystem properties. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2009, 180, 2582-615.

96. Mortensen, J. J.; Larsen, A. H.; Kuisma, M.; et al. GPAW: an open Python package for electronic structure calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 160, 092503.

97. Thompson, A. P.; Aktulga, H. M.; Berger, R.; et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2022, 271, 108171.

98. Abraham, M. J.; Murtola, T.; Schulz, R.; et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 2015, 1-2, 19-25.

99. Eastman, P.; Galvelis, R.; Peláez, R. P.; et al. OpenMM 8: molecular dynamics simulation with machine learning potentials. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2023, 128, 109-16.

100. Grecco, H. E.; Dartiailh, M. C.; Thalhammer-Thurner, G.; Bronger, T.; Bauer, F. PyVISA: the Python instrumentation package. J. Open. Source. Softw. 2023, 8, 5304.

101. Pyzer-Knapp, E. O.; Pitera, J. W.; Staar, P. W. J.; et al. Accelerating materials discovery using artificial intelligence, high performance computing and robotics. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 84.

102. Wierenga, R. P.; Golas, S. M.; Ho, W.; Coley, C. W.; Esvelt, K. M. PyLabRobot: an open-source, hardware agnostic interface for liquid-handling robots and accessories. Device 2023, 1, 100111.

103. Pydantic-Ai. 2025. https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-ai. (accessed 2026-05-19).

104. Zhang, J.; Gan, J.; Wang, X.; et al. MatSciBench: benchmarking the reasoning ability of large language models in materials science. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2510.12171. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.12171. (accessed 2026-05-19).

105. Cheung, J. J.; Shen, S.; Zhuang, Y.; Li, Y.; Ramprasad, R.; Zhang, C. MSQA: benchmarking LLMs on graduate-level materials science reasoning and knowledge. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.23982. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23982. (accessed 2026-05-19).

106. Liu, S.; Hu, B.; Ye, B.; Xu, J.; Srolovitz, D. J.; Wen, T. MatTools: benchmarking large language models for materials science tools. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.10852. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10852. (accessed 2026-05-19).

107. Yanguas-Gil, A.; Dearing, M. T.; Elam, J. W.; et al. Benchmarking large language models for materials synthesis: the case of atomic layer deposition. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2412.10477. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.10477. (accessed 2026-05-19).

108. Riebesell, J.; Goodall, R. E. A.; Benner, P.; et al. A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2025, 7, 836-47.

109. Li, H.; Fang, X.; Li, Y.; et al. RxnBench: a multimodal benchmark for evaluating large language models on chemical reaction understanding from scientific literature. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.23565. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.23565. (accessed 2026-05-19).

110. Song, Z.; Lu, J.; Du, Y.; et al. Evaluating large language models in scientific discovery. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.15567. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.15567. (accessed 2026-05-19).

111. Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; He, X.; et al. Scientists’ first exam: probing cognitive abilities of MLLM via perception, understanding, and reasoning. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2506.10521. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.10521. (accessed 2026-05-19).

112. LangSmith docs. https://docs.langchain.com/langsmith/home. (accessed 2026-05-19).

113. Evals. https://github.com/openai/evals. (accessed 2026-05-19).

114. Es, S.; James, J.; Espinosa-Anke, L.; Schockaert, S. Ragas: automated evaluation of retrieval augmented generation. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2309.15217. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.15217. (accessed 2026-05-19).

115. Kononova, O.; He, T.; Huo, H.; Trewartha, A.; Olivetti, E. A.; Ceder, G. Opportunities and challenges of text mining in materials research. iScience 2021, 24, 102155.

116. Dai, H.; Li, C.; Coley, C. W.; Dai, B.; Song, L. Retrosynthesis prediction with conditional graph logic network. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2001.01408. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.01408. (accessed 2026-05-19).

117. Volk, A. A.; Epps, R. W.; Yonemoto, D. T.; et al. AlphaFlow: autonomous discovery and optimization of multi-step chemistry using a self-driven fluidic lab guided by reinforcement learning. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1403.

118. Huang, S.; Cole, J. M. A database of battery materials auto-generated using ChemDataExtractor. Sci. Data. 2020, 7, 260.

119. Yan, R.; Jiang, X.; Wang, W.; Dang, D.; Su, Y. Materials information extraction via automatically generated corpus. Sci. Data. 2022, 9, 401.

120. Liu, Q.; Polak, M. P.; Kim, S. Y.; et al. Beyond designer’s knowledge: generating materials design hypotheses via large language models. Acta. Mater. 2025, 297, 121307.

121. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. SciAgents: automating scientific discovery through multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.05556. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.05556. (accessed 2026-05-19).

122. Hawizy, L.; Jessop, D. M.; Adams, N.; Murray-Rust, P. ChemicalTagger: a tool for semantic text-mining in chemistry. J. Cheminform. 2011, 3, 17.

123. Swain, M. C.; Cole, J. M. ChemDataExtractor: a toolkit for automated extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 1894-904.

124. Kumar, P.; Kabra, S.; Cole, J. M. A database of stress-strain properties auto-generated from the scientific literature using ChemDataExtractor. Sci. Data. 2024, 11, 1273.

125. Tshitoyan, V.; Dagdelen, J.; Weston, L.; et al. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature 2019, 571, 95-8.

126. Weston, L.; Tshitoyan, V.; Dagdelen, J.; et al. Named entity recognition and normalization applied to large-scale information extraction from the materials science literature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 3692-702.

127. Wang, W.; Jiang, X.; Tian, S.; et al. Alloy synthesis and processing by semi-supervised text mining. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 183.

128. Zhang, R.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Q.; et al. A literature-mining method of integrating text and table extraction for materials science publications. Computa. Mater. Sci. 2023, 230, 112441.

129. An, Y.; Greenberg, J.; Kalinowski, A.; et al. Knowledge graph question answering for materials science (KGQA4MAT): developing natural language interface for metal-organic frameworks knowledge graph (MOF-KG) using LLM. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2309.11361. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.11361. (accessed 2026-05-19).

130. Dagdelen, J.; Dunn, A.; Lee, S.; et al. Structured information extraction from complex scientific text with fine-tuned large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1418.

131. Yi, G. H.; Choi, J.; Song, H.; et al. MaTableGPT: GPT‐based table data extractor from materials science literature. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, 2408221.

132. da Silva, V. T.; Rademaker, A.; Lionti, K.; et al. Automated, LLM enabled extraction of synthesis details for reticular materials from scientific literature. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.03484. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.03484. (accessed 2026-05-19).

133. Song, Y.; Miret, S.; Zhang, H.; Liu, B. HoneyBee: progressive instruction finetuning of large language models for materials science. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2310.08511. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.08511. (accessed 2026-05-19).

134. Wang, Q.; Downey, D.; Ji, H.; Hope, T. SciMON: scientific inspiration machines optimized for novelty. In Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers); 2024 Jul; Bangkok, Thailand. Association for Computational Linguistics; 2024. pp. 279-99.

135. Lai, Z.; Pu, Y. PriM: principle-inspired material discovery through multi-agent collaboration. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.08810. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08810. (accessed 2026-05-19).

136. Macleod, B. P.; Parlane, F. G. L.; Morrissey, T. D.; et al. Self-driving laboratory for accelerated discovery of thin-film materials. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz8867.

137. Boyar, O.; Priyadarsini, I.; Takeda, S.; Hamada, L. LLM-fusion: a novel multimodal fusion model for accelerated material discovery. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.01022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.01022. (accessed 2026-05-19).

138. Choudhary, K. ChatGPT Material Explorer: design and implementation of a custom GPT assistant for materials science applications. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2025, 14, 276-83.

139. Wang, A. Y.; Kauwe, S. K.; Murdock, R. J.; Sparks, T. D. Compositionally restricted attention-based network for materials property predictions. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 77.

140. Jha, D.; Ward, L.; Paul, A.; et al. ElemNet: deep learning the chemistry of materials from only elemental composition. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 17593.

141. Goodall, R. E. A.; Lee, A. A. Predicting materials properties without crystal structure: deep representation learning from stoichiometry. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 6280.

142. Wang, B.; Ouyang, Y.; Li, Y.; et al. MoMa: a modular deep learning framework for material property prediction. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.15483. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.15483. (accessed 2026-05-19).

143. Taniai, T.; Igarashi, R.; Suzuki, Y.; et al. Crystalformer: infinitely connected attention for periodic structure encoding. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2403.11686. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.11686. (accessed 2026-05-19).

144. Choudhary, K.; Decost, B. Atomistic line graph neural network for improved materials property predictions. npj. Comput. Mater. 2021, 7, 185.

145. Xie, T.; Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 145301.

146. Yan, K.; Liu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Ji, S. Periodic graph transformers for crystal material property prediction. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2209.11807. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.11807. (accessed 2026-05-19).

147. Nouira, A.; Sokolovska, N.; Crivello, J. C. CrystalGAN: learning to discover crystallographic structures with generative adversarial networks. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1810.11203. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.11203. (accessed 2026-05-19).

148. Bagal, V.; Aggarwal, R.; Vinod, P. K.; Priyakumar, U. D. MolGPT: molecular generation using a transformer-decoder model. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 62, 2064-76.

149. Li, Z.; Cao, B.; Jiao, R.; et al. Materials generation in the era of artificial intelligence: a comprehensive survey. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.16379. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.16379. (accessed 2026-05-19).

150. Xu, A.; Desai, R.; Wang, L.; Hope, G.; Ritz, E. PLaID++: a preference aligned language model for targeted inorganic materials design. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.07150. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.07150. (accessed 2026-05-19).

151. Zeni, C.; Pinsler, R.; Zügner, D.; et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 2025, 639, 624-32.

152. Karpovich, C.; Pan, E.; Olivetti, E. A. Deep reinforcement learning for inverse inorganic materials design. Npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 287.

153. Cleeton, C.; Sarkisov, L. Inverse design of metal-organic frameworks using deep dreaming approaches. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 4806.

154. Zuo, Y.; Qin, M.; Chen, C.; et al. Accelerating materials discovery with Bayesian optimization and graph deep learning. Mater. Today. 2021, 51, 126-35.

155. Huang, J.; Xing, Q.; Ji, J.; Yang, B. Code-generated graph representations using multiple LLM agents for material properties prediction. In Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR; 2025. pp. 25972-86. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v267/huang25an.html. (accessed 2026-05-19).

156. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. Autonomous inorganic materials discovery via multi-agent physics-aware scientific reasoning. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.02956. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.02956. (accessed 2026-05-19).

157. Hjorth Larsen, A.; Jørgen Mortensen, J.; Blomqvist, J.; et al. The atomic simulation environment - a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 2017, 29, 273002.

158. Chandrasekhar, A.; Farimani, A. B. Automating MD simulations for proteins using large language models: NAMD-agent. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.07887. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.07887. (accessed 2026-05-19).

159. Wang, Z.; Huang, H.; Zhao, H.; et al. DREAMS: density functional theory based research engine for agentic materials simulation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.14267. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.14267. (accessed 2026-05-19).

160. Deng, B.; Zhong, P.; Jun, K.; et al. CHGNet as a pretrained universal neural network potential for charge-informed atomistic modelling. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2023, 5, 1031-41.

161. Batzner, S.; Musaelian, A.; Sun, L.; et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 2453.

162. Musaelian, A.; Batzner, S.; Johansson, A.; et al. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 579.

163. Zhang, D.; Liu, X.; Zhang, X.; et al. DPA-2: a large atomic model as a multi-task learner. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 293.

164. Batatia, I.; Benner, P.; Chiang, Y.; et al. A foundation model for atomistic materials chemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 2025, 163, 184110.

165. Yang, H.; Hu, C.; Zhou, Y.; et al. MatterSim: a deep learning atomistic model across elements, temperatures and pressures. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2405.04967. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.04967. (accessed 2026-05-19).

166. Chen, C.; Ong, S. P. A universal graph deep learning interatomic potential for the periodic table. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2022, 2, 718-28.

167. Li, W.; Bazant, M. Z.; Zhu, J. Phase-Field DeepONet: Physics-informed deep operator neural network for fast simulations of pattern formation governed by gradient flows of free-energy functionals. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023, 416, 116299.

168. Haghighat, E.; Raissi, M.; Moure, A.; Gomez, H.; Juanes, R. A physics-informed deep learning framework for inversion and surrogate modeling in solid mechanics. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2021, 379, 113741.

169. Campbell, Q.; Cox, S.; Medina, J.; Watterson, B.; White, A. D. MDCrow: automating molecular dynamics workflows with large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.09565. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09565. (accessed 2026-05-19).

170. Shi, Z.; Xin, C.; Huo, T.; et al. A fine-tuned large language model based molecular dynamics agent for code generation to obtain material thermodynamic parameters. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 10295.

171. Zou, Y.; Cheng, A. H.; Aldossary, A.; et al. El Agente: an autonomous agent for quantum chemistry. Matter 2025, 8, 102263.

172. Zhang, T.; Liu, Z.; Xin, Y.; Jiao, Y. MooseAgent: a LLM based multi-agent framework for automating moose simulation. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2504.08621. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.08621. (accessed 2026-05-19).

173. Ghafarollahi, A.; Buehler, M. J. AtomAgents: alloy design and discovery through physics-aware multi-modal multi-agent artificial intelligence. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.10022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.10022. (accessed 2026-05-19).

174. Chaudhari, A.; Ock, J.; Barati Farimani, A. Modular large language model agents for multi-task computational materials science. Commun. Mater. 2026, 7, 131.

175. Gottweis, J.; Weng, W. H.; Daryin, A.; et al. Towards an AI co-scientist. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.18864. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.18864. (accessed 2026-05-19).

176. Abolhasani, M.; Kumacheva, E. The rise of self-driving labs in chemical and materials sciences. Nat. Synth. 2023, 2, 483-92.

177. Guha, S.; Mullick, A.; Agrawal, J.; et al. MatScIE: an automated tool for the generation of databases of methods and parameters used in the computational materials science literature. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 192, 110325.

178. Zhang, L.; Stricker, M. MatNexus: a comprehensive text mining and analysis suite for materials discovery. SoftwareX 2024, 26, 101654.

179. Jalali, M.; Luo, Y.; Caulfield, L.; Sauter, E.; Nefedov, A.; Wöll, C. Large language models in electronic laboratory notebooks: transforming materials science research workflows. Mater. Today. Commun. 2024, 40, 109801.

180. He, T.; Huo, H.; Bartel, C. J.; Wang, Z.; Cruse, K.; Ceder, G. Precursor recommendation for inorganic synthesis by machine learning materials similarity from scientific literature. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadg8180.

181. Zheng, Z.; Zhang, O.; Nguyen, H. L.; et al. ChatGPT Research Group for Optimizing the Crystallinity of MOFs and COFs. ACS. Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 2161-70.

182. Cissé, A.; Evangelopoulos, X.; Gusev, V. V.; Cooper, A. I. Language-based Bayesian optimization research assistant (BORA). In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligen, Aug 16-22, 2025; Montreal, Canada. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization; 2025. pp. 4967-75.

183. Liu, T.; Astorga, N.; Seedat, N.; van der Schaar, M. Large language models to enhance bayesian optimization. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.03921. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.03921. (accessed 2026-05-19).

184. Chang, C. Y.; Azvar, M.; Okwudire, C.; Kontar, R. A. LLINBO: trustworthy LLM-in-the-loop bayesian optimization. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.14756. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14756. (accessed 2026-05-19).

185. Yang, Z.; Wang, D.; Ge, L.; Wang, B.; Fu, T.; Li, Y. Reasoning BO: enhancing Bayesian optimization with long-context reasoning power of LLMs. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.12833. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.12833. (accessed 2026-05-19).

186. Guo, T.; Guo, K.; Nan, B.; et al. What can large language models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight tasks. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2305.18365. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.18365. (accessed 2026-05-19).

187. Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wu, W.; et al. MaterialBrain: high-performance material synthesis extraction via human–AI-curated few-shot large language models. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 66, 228-45.

188. Mcdermott, M. J.; Dwaraknath, S. S.; Persson, K. A. A graph-based network for predicting chemical reaction pathways in solid-state materials synthesis. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 3097.

189. Qu, Y.; Huang, K.; Yin, M.; et al. CRISPR-GPT for agentic automation of gene-editing experiments. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2025, 10, 245-58.

190. Acharya, A.; Sharma, A. K.; Parker, D.; et al. LABMATE: language model based multi-agent system to accelerate catalysis experiments. In Proceedings of the SC '25 Workshops of the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, Association for Computing Machinery; 2025. pp. 607-15.

191. Li, H.; Sarkar, S.; Lu, W.; et al. Collective intelligence for AI-assisted chemical synthesis. Nature 2026, 651, 107-15.

192. Fan, H.; Huang, J.; Xu, J.; et al. AutoMEX: streamlining material extrusion with AI agents powered by large language models and knowledge graphs. Mater. Design. 2025, 251, 113644.

193. Tao, H.; Wu, T.; Kheiri, S.; Aldeghi, M.; Aspuru‐Guzik, A.; Kumacheva, E. Self‐driving platform for metal nanoparticle synthesis: combining microfluidics and machine learning. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2106725.

194. Sadeghi, S.; Bateni, F.; Kim, T.; et al. Autonomous nanomanufacturing of lead-free metal halide perovskite nanocrystals using a self-driving fluidic lab. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 580-91.

195. Burger, B.; Maffettone, P. M.; Gusev, V. V.; et al. A mobile robotic chemist. Nature 2020, 583, 237-41.

196. Hysmith, H.; Foadian, E.; Padhy, S. P.; et al. The future of self-driving laboratories: from human in the loop interactive AI to gamification. Digital. Discov. 2024, 3, 621-36.

197. Weng, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhu, L.; Huang, J. MatQnA: a benchmark dataset for multi-modal large language models in materials characterization and analysis. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2509.11335. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.11335. (accessed 2026-05-19).

198. Wang, H.; Guo, L.; Huo, P.; et al. S1-MMAlign: a large-scale, multi-disciplinary dataset for scientific figure-text understanding. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.00264. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.00264. (accessed 2026-05-19).

199. Botifoll, M.; Pinto‐Huguet, I.; Rotunno, E.; et al. Artificial intelligence‐assisted workflow for transmission electron microscopy: from data analysis automation to materials knowledge unveiling. Adv. Mater. 2025, e06785.

200. Davel, C.; Bassiri-Gharb, N.; Correa-Baena, J. Machine learning in X-ray diffraction for materials discovery and characterization. Matter 2025, 8, 102272.

201. Cao, B.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, Y.; et al. XQueryer: an intelligent crystal structure identifier for powder X-ray diffraction. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2025, 12, nwaf421.

202. Li, C.; Han, X.; Yao, C.; Ban, X. MatSAM: efficient extraction of microstructures of materials via visual large model. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.05638. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.05638. (accessed 2026-05-19).

203. Anker, A. S.; Butler, K. T.; Selvan, R.; Jensen, KMØ. Machine learning for analysis of experimental scattering and spectroscopy data in materials chemistry. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 14003-19.

204. Choudhary, K. MicroscopyGPT: generating atomic-structure captions from microscopy images of 2D materials with vision-language transformers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2025, 16, 7028-35.

205. Chen, Y.; Yang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Ahmed, M.; Wang, Y. A large-language-model assisted automated scale bar detection and extraction framework for scanning electron microscopic images. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2510.11260. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.11260. (accessed 2026-05-19).

206. Fei, Y.; McDermott, M. J.; Rom, C. L.; Wang, S.; Ceder, G. Dara: automated multiple-hypothesis phase identification and refinement from powder X-ray diffraction. Chem. Mater. 2026, 38, 1364-76.

207. Bazgir, A.; Zhang, Y. Drug discovery agent: an automated vision detection system for drug-cell interactions. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPR Workshops 2025, 2025; pp. 4308-16. https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2025W/CVDD/html/Bazgir_Drug_Discovery_Agent_An_Automated_Vision_Detection_System_for_Drug-Cell_CVPRW_2025_paper.html. (accessed 2026-05-19).

208. Bazgir, A.; Zhang, Y. Matagent: a human-in-the-loop multi-agent LLM framework for accelerating the material science discovery cycle. In AI for Accelerated Materials Design-ICLR 2025, 2025. https://openreview.net/pdf/7c4f3b61beb01e7f4740671b78cd1f777bd0e60a.pdf. (accessed 2026-05-19).

209. Yao, L.; Samantray, S.; Ghosh, A.; et al. Operationalizing serendipity: multi-agent AI workflows for enhanced materials characterization with theory-in-the-loop. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.06569. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.06569. (accessed 2026-05-19).

210. Yang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. AutoMat: enabling automated crystal structure reconstruction from microscopy via agentic tool use. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.12650. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.12650. (accessed 2026-05-19).

211. Noh, H.; Lee, N.; Na, G. S.; Kim, K.; Park, C. IR-agent: expert-inspired LLM agents for structure elucidation from infrared spectra. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2508.16112. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.16112. (accessed 2026-05-19).

212. Mandal, I.; Soni, J.; Zaki, M.; et al. Evaluating large language model agents for automation of atomic force microscopy. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9104.

213. Darvish, K.; Skreta, M.; Zhao, Y.; et al. ORGANA: a robotic assistant for automated chemistry experimentation and characterization. Matter 2025, 8, 101897.

214. Jia, S.; Zhang, C.; Fung, V. LLMatDesign: autonomous materials discovery with large language models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.13163. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.13163. (accessed 2026-05-19).

215. Nikolaev, P.; Hooper, D.; Webber, F.; et al. Autonomy in materials research: a case study in carbon nanotube growth. npj. Comput. Mater. 2016, 2, 16031.

216. Ye, X.; Yuan, W.; Fu, P.; et al. A full-process artificial intelligence framework for perovskite solar cells. Sci. China. Mater. 2025, 68, 2526-35.

217. Ruan, Y.; Lu, C.; Xu, N.; et al. An automatic end-to-end chemical synthesis development platform powered by large language models. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 10160.

218. Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Xu, H.; Jin, Z.; Wu, Q.; Li, C. TopoMAS: large language model driven topological materials multiagent system. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.04053. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.04053. (accessed 2026-05-19).

219. Lee, J.; Ely, J.; Zhang, K.; Ajith, A.; Campbell, C. R.; Choudhary, K. AGAPI-agents: an open-access agentic AI Platform For Accelerated Materials Design on AtomGPT.org. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.11935. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.11935. (accessed 2026-05-19).

220. Shen, Y.; Wang, L.; Huang, Y.; et al. Unlocking azobenzene isomerization mechanisms via an LLM agent-driven workflow integrating simulation, experiment, and machine learning. Chem. Sci. 2026.

221. Juchli, D. SiLA 2: the next generation lab automation standard. In Smart Biolabs of the Future, Beutel, S., Lenk, F. Eds.; Springer International Publishing, 2022; pp. 147–74.

222. Roch, L. M.; Häse, F.; Aspuru-Guzik, A. Chapter 16: ChemOS: an orchestration software to democratize autonomous discovery. In: Brown, N.; Editors. Artificial Intelligence In Drug Discovery. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2020. pp. 349-88.

223. Quigley, M.; Conley, K.; Gerkey, B.; et al. ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System. In ICRA workshop on open source software, 2009. http://lars.mec.ua.pt/public/LAR%20Projects/BinPicking/2016_RodrigoSalgueiro/LIB/ROS/icraoss09-ROS.pdf. (accessed 2026-05-19).

224. Fawzy, S. M.; M. Ali MK, Allam NK. Artificial intelligence-driven materials design for next-generation sustainable energy technologies. ACS. Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2026, 14, 4745-61.

225. Bouchard, D.; Chauhan, M. S.; Skarbrevik, D.; Ra, H. K.; Bajaj, V.; Ahmad, Z. UQLM: a Python package for uncertainty quantification in large language models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2507.06196. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.06196. (accessed 2026-05-19).

226. Krasecki, V. K.; Sharma, A.; Cavell, A. C.; et al. The role of experimental noise in a hybrid classical-molecular computer to solve combinatorial optimization problems. ACS. Cent. Sci. 2023, 9, 1453-65.

227. Zhang, J.; Choubey, P. K.; Huang, K. H.; Xiong, C.; Wu, C. S. Agentic uncertainty quantification. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.15703. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.15703. (accessed 2026-05-19).

228. Bougzime, O.; Jabbar, S.; Cruz, C.; Demoly, F. Unlocking the potential of generative AI through neuro-symbolic architectures: benefits and limitations. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2502.11269. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.11269. (accessed 2026-05-19).

229. Shen, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xi, Z.; et al. SciAgentGym: benchmarking multi-step scientific tool-use in LLM agents. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2602.12984. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.12984. (accessed 2026-05-19).

230. Xu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Probing scientific general intelligence of LLMs with scientist-aligned workflows. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2512.16969. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.16969. (accessed 2026-05-19).

231. Chaturvedi, S. S.; Bergerson, J.; Mallick, T. Toward reliable, safe, and secure LLMs for scientific applications. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2603.18235. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.18235. (accessed 2026-05-19).

232. Zhao, H.; Tang, X.; Yang, Z.; et al. ChemSafetyBench: benchmarking LLM safety on chemistry domain. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.16736. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.16736. (accessed 2026-05-19).