REFERENCES
1. Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Huang, W.; Zhang, S. Microstructure related analysis of tensile and fatigue properties for sand casting aluminum alloy cylinder head. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2022, 136, 106210.
3. Peng, W.; Xue, H.; Ge, R.; Peng, Z. The influential factors on very high cycle fatigue testing results. MATEC. Web. Conf. 2018, 165, 20002.
4. Yang, G.; Wang, M.; Li, Q.; Ding, R. Methodology to evaluate fatigue damage of high-speed train welded bogie frames based on on-track dynamic stress test data. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 32, 365.
5. Jimenez-Martinez, M. Manufacturing effects on fatigue strength. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 108, 104339.
6. Dixon, W. J.; Mood, A. M. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1948, 43, 109-26.
7. Veile, G.; Rudolph, J.; Grözinger, N.; Herzig, M.; Grimm, M.; Weihe, S. Improving fatigue testing of AISI 304L stainless steel in high temperature water regarding their complex hardening and softening material behaviour. Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 2025, 218, 105612.
8. Hirose, T.; Sakasegawa, H.; Nakajima, M.; Kato, T.; Miyazawa, T.; Tanigawa, H. Effects of test environment on high temperature fatigue properties of reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steel, F82H. Fusion. Eng. Des. 2018, 136, 1073-6.
9. Kamal, M.; Rahman, M. Advances in fatigue life modeling: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2018, 82, 940-9.
10. Zhu, S.; Yu, Z.; Correia, J.; De Jesus, A.; Berto, F. Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials. Int. J. Fatigue. 2018, 112, 279-88.
11. Fatemi, A.; Socie, D. F. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out‐of‐phase loading. Fatigue. Fract. Eng. Mat. Struct. 1988, 11, 149-65.
12. Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Chen, T.; Xu, S. Prediction and evaluation of fatigue life via modified energy method considering surface processing. Int. J. Damage. Mech. 2022, 31, 426-43.
13. Cui, W. A state-of-the-art review on fatigue life prediction methods for metal structures. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2002, 7, 43-56.
14. Shang, C.; Jiang, T.; Wu, H.; et al. Efficient design of hydrogen-resistant ultra-high-strength steels via active learning and multiscale characterization. Corros. Commun. 2026, 21, 60-72.
15. Zhang, M.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X.; et al. High cycle fatigue life prediction of laser additive manufactured stainless steel: a machine learning approach. Int. J. Fatigue. 2019, 128, 105194.
16. Yang, J.; Kang, G.; Liu, Y.; Kan, Q. A novel method of multiaxial fatigue life prediction based on deep learning. Int. J. Fatigue. 2021, 151, 106356.
17. Arvanitis, K.; Nikolakopoulos, P.; Pavlou, D.; Farmanbar, M. Machine learning-based fatigue lifetime prediction of structural steels. Alexandria. Eng. J. 2025, 125, 55-66.
18. Freed, Y. Machine learning-based predictions of crack growth rates in an aeronautical aluminum alloy. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2024, 130, 104278.
19. Rathore, S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, A.; Mishra, K.; Singh, A. Prediction of sub-critical fatigue crack growth rate in a high-carbon tempered martensitic steel at varying R ratio: experimental investigation and machine learning based modelling. Int. J. Fatigue. 2025, 193, 108804.
20. Shiraiwa, T.; Miyazawa, Y.; Enoki, M. Prediction of fatigue strength in steels by linear regression and neural network. Mater. Trans. 2018, 60, 189-98.
21. Choi, D. Data-driven materials modeling with XGBoost algorithm and statistical inference analysis for prediction of fatigue strength of steels. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2019, 20, 129-38.
22. Yan, F.; Song, K.; Liu, Y.; Chen, S.; Chen, J. Predictions and mechanism analyses of the fatigue strength of steel based on machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 15334-49.
23. Pan, S. J.; Yang, Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE. Trans. Knowl. Data. Eng. 2010, 22, 1345-59.
24. Tang, S.; Ma, J.; Yan, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Khoo, B. C. Deep transfer learning strategy in intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 134, 108678.
25. Hu, J.; Chen, M.; Tang, H.; Zhang, J. An adversarial transfer learning method based on domain distribution prediction for aero-engine fault diagnosis. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 133, 108287.
26. Li, Y.; Wei, P.; Xiang, G.; Jia, C.; Liu, H. Gear contact fatigue life prediction based on transfer learning. Int. J. Fatigue. 2023, 173, 107686.
27. Wei, X.; Zhang, C.; Han, S.; Jia, Z.; Wang, C.; Xu, W. High cycle fatigue S-N curve prediction of steels based on transfer learning guided long short term memory network. Int. J. Fatigue. 2022, 163, 107050.
28. Zhai, Q.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, P. A transfer learning enhanced physics-informed neural network for predicting fatigue life of megacasting alloy with limited data sizes. Int. J. Fatigue. 2025, 200, 109129.
29. Furuya, Y.; Nishikawa, H.; Hirukawa, H.; Nagashima, N.; Takeuchi, E. Catalogue of NIMS fatigue data sheets. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2019, 20, 1055-72.
30. Patro, S. G. K.; Sahu, K. K. Normalization: a preprocessing stage. arXiv 2015, arXiv:1503.06462. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1503.06462. (accessed 2026-06-03).
31. Miao, B.; Lin, G.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, H. Machine learning applications in metallic materials: recent advances and future perspectives. J. Alloys. Compd. 2026, 1062, 187486.
32. Shmuel, A.; Glickman, O.; Lazebnik, T. A comprehensive benchmark of machine and deep learning models on structured data for regression and classification. Neurocomputing 2025, 655, 131337.
33. Colin Cameron, A.; Windmeijer, F. A. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J. Econom. 1997, 77, 329-42.
34. Herlocker, J. L.; Konstan, J. A.; Terveen, L. G.; Riedl, J. T. Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM. Trans. Inf. Syst. 2004, 22, 5-53.
35. Cleger-Tamayo, S.; Fernández-Luna, J. M.; Huete, J. On the use of weighted mean absolute error in recommender systems. 2012. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:16692759. (accessed 2026-06-03).
36. Sheugh, L.; Alizadeh, S. H. A note on Pearson correlation coefficient as a metric of similarity in recommender system. In 2015 Ai & Robotics (IRANOPEN), Qazvin, Iran. Apr 12, 2015. IEEE; 2015. p. 1-6.
37. Chai, T.; Draxler, R. R. Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)? - Arguments against avoiding RMSE in the literature. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2014, 7, 1247-50.
38. Shang, C.; Zhu, D.; Wu, H.; et al. A quantitative relation for the ductile-brittle transition temperature in pipeline steel. Scr. Mater. 2024, 244, 116023.
39. Efron, B. Estimating the error rate of a prediction rule: improvement on cross-validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1983, 78, 316-31.
40. Lundberg, S.; Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1705.07874. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874. (accessed 2026-06-03).
41. Kohavi, R.; John, G. H. Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artif. Intell. 1997, 97, 273-324.
42. Park, J. S.; Kim, S. J.; Lee, C. S. Effect of W addition on the low cycle fatigue behavior of high Cr ferritic steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2001, 298, 127-36.
