REFERENCES
1. Clouet, E.; Caillard, D.; Chaari, N.; Onimus, F.; Rodney, D. Dislocation locking versus easy glide in titanium and zirconium. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 931-6.
3. Yu, Q.; Shan, Z. W.; Li, J.; et al. Strong crystal size effect on deformation twinning. Nature 2010, 463, 335-8.
4. Banerjee, D.; Williams, J. Perspectives on titanium science and technology. Acta. Mater. 2013, 61, 844-79.
5. Chen, R.; Tan, C.; You, Z.; et al. Effect of α phase on high-strain rate deformation behavior of laser melting deposited Ti-6.5Al-1Mo-1V-2Zr titanium alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2019, 750, 81-90.
6. Zong, X.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; et al. High strain rate response of Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si titanium alloy fabricated by laser additive manufacturing. J. Alloys. Compd. 2019, 781, 47-55.
7. Huang, B.; Miao, X.; Luo, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Microstructure and texture evolution near the adiabatic shear band (ASB) in TC17 titanium alloy with starting equiaxed microstructure studied by EBSD. Mater. Charact. 2019, 151, 151-65.
8. Hao, F.; Liu, X.; Du, Y.; et al. Excellent dynamic mechanical properties of a newly developed titanium alloy with bimodal structure. J. Alloys. Compd. 2023, 961, 170980.
9. Tiamiyu, A.; Odeshi, A.; Szpunar, J. Multiple strengthening sources and adiabatic shear banding during high strain-rate deformation of AISI 321 austenitic stainless steel: effects of grain size and strain rate. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2018, 711, 233-49.
10. Li, Z.; Wang, B.; Zhao, S.; Valiev, R. Z.; Vecchio, K. S.; Meyers, M. A. Dynamic deformation and failure of ultrafine-grained titanium. Acta. Mater. 2017, 125, 210-8.
11. Arab, A.; Chen, P.; Guo, Y. Effects of microstructure on the dynamic properties of TA15 titanium alloy. Mech. Mater. 2019, 137, 103121.
12. Chen, B.; Sun, W. Transitional structure of {332}<113>β twin boundary in a deformed metastable β-type Ti-Nb-based alloy, revealed by atomic resolution electron microscopy. Scr. Mater. 2018, 150, 115-9.
13. Qi, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, X.; Chu, Z.; Ding, X.; Sun, J. Strengthening mechanisms of a near-α titanium alloy with high strength and impact resistance. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 38, 1664-74.
14. Wang, H.; Tu, X.; Guo, P.; et al. Impact toughness and its deformation behavior of a novel low-cost titanium alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2025, 35, 4412-26.
15. Tang, S.; Su, J.; Li, L.; Han, Y.; Sing, S. L.; Fan, J. Achieving superior high-temperature strength and ductility in near-α titanium alloys by in-situ silicide modulation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 237, 38-53.
16. Dai, J.; Tang, B.; Wang, C.; et al. Deciphering the impact toughening mechanism of α+β titanium alloy with lamellar microstructure: from crack initiation and propagation perspectives. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2026, 249, 214-29.
17. Shi, W.; Li, J.; Wang, C. Study on action mechanisms of alloy element for adiabatic shearing sensitivity. AIP. Adv. 2019, 9, 095043.
18. Li, D.; Hui, S.; Ye, W.; Li, C. Microstructure and mechanical properties of a new high‐strength and high‐toughness titanium alloy. Rare. Met. 2023, 42, 281-7.
19. Lu, H.; Ji, P.; Li, B.; et al. Mechanical properties and deformation mechanism of a novel metastable β-type Ti–4V–2Mo–2Fe alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022, 848, 143376.
20. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Liu, K.; et al. Hierarchical structure and deformation behavior of a novel multicomponent β titanium alloy with ultrahigh strength. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 107, 227-42.
21. Zhu, X.; Fan, Q.; Wang, D.; et al. Influence of twins found in adiabatic shear bands on dynamic recrystallization of a near β Ti-5.5Mo-7.2Al-4.5Zr-2.6Sn-2.1Cr alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022, 842, 143084.
22. Xu, G.; Zhao, X.; Xia, W.; et al. A review on microstructure design, processing, and strengthening mechanism of high-strength titanium alloys. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 2025, 35, 258-77.
23. Wang, W. Y.; Li, G.; Liu, Z.; et al. Materials genome engineering and intelligent science: the endless frontier in AI+ era. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2025, 43, 93-109.
24. Xie, J. Prospects of materials genome engineering frontiers. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e17.
26. Xie, M.; Gan, Y.; Wang, H. Research on new material power strategy by 2035. Chin. J. Eng. Sci. 2020, 22, 1.
27. Xie, J.; Su, Y.; Zhang, D.; Feng, Q. A vision of materials genome engineering in China. Engineering 2022, 10, 10-2.
28. Liu, Z. Building materials genome from ground‐state configuration to engineering advance. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e15.
29. Geng, X.; Wang, F.; Wu, H.; et al. Data‐driven and artificial intelligence accelerated steel material research and intelligent manufacturing technology. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e10.
30. Lv, S.; Peng, L.; Wu, W.; Yao, Y.; Jiao, S.; Hu, W. Bridging language models and computational materials science: a prompt‐driven framework for material property prediction. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2025, 3, e70013.
31. Shang, Y.; Xiong, Z.; An, K.; Hauch, J. A.; Brabec, C. J.; Li, N. Materials genome engineering accelerates the research and development of organic and perovskite photovoltaics. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e28.
32. Xu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Huo, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, M. Advances in data‐assisted high‐throughput computations for material design. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e11.
34. Wang, W. Y.; Li, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, Z. Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 158, 42-8.
35. Li, W.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, M.; et al. Symbolic regression accelerates the discovery of quantitative relationships in rubber material aging. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 29.
36. Pan, J.; Shi, R.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Composition-deformation mechanism-property machine learning model for strength-ductility improvement of β-type titanium alloys. Int. J. Plast. 2025, 194, 104461.
37. Zou, C.; Li, J.; Wang, W. Y.; et al. Integrating data mining and machine learning to discover high-strength ductile titanium alloys. Acta. Mater. 2021, 202, 211-21.
38. Tan, Y.; Dong, R.; Duan, Z.; Li, H.; Hou, H.; Zhao, Y. Machine learning coupled with an improved exhaustive method-assisted design of a low cost Ti-Al-Cr-Fe-Si series titanium alloy. Mater. Design. 2025, 257, 114526.
39. Liu, X.; Niu, H.; Zhao, S.; et al. Microstructural evolution and prediction of TC18 titanium alloys by high-throughput technology and machine learning. J. Alloys. Compd. 2025, 1017, 179202.
40. Zhan, Z.; Hu, W.; Meng, Q. Data-driven fatigue life prediction in additive manufactured titanium alloy: a damage mechanics based machine learning framework. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2021, 252, 107850.
41. Paturi, U. M. R.; Palakurthy, S. T.; Cheruku, S.; Vidhya Darshini, B.; Reddy, N. Role of machine learning in additive manufacturing of titanium alloys - a review. Arch. Computat. Methods. Eng. 2023, 30, 5053-69.
42. Lu, T.; Li, M.; Lu, W.; Zhang, T. Recent progress in the data-driven discovery of novel photovoltaic materials. J. Mater. Inf. 2022, 2, 7.
43. Shi, B.; Lookman, T.; Xue, D. Multi‐objective optimization and its application in materials science. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e14.
44. Zhou, C.; Yin, G.; Hu, X. Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Mater. Design. 2009, 30, 1209-15.
45. Ashby, M. Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Acta. Mater. 2000, 48, 359-69.
46. Ashjari, M.; Khoshravan, M. R. Multi-objective optimization of a functionally graded sandwich panel under mechanical loading in the presence of stress constraint. J. Mech. Behav. Mater. 2017, 26, 79-93.
47. Hwang, Y.; Lim, D. Y. Dual cone gradient descent for training physics-informed neural networks. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.18426. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.18426. (accessed 24 Mar 2026).
48. Malashin, I.; Tynchenko, V.; Gantimurov, A.; Nelyub, V.; Borodulin, A. A multi-objective optimization of neural networks for predicting the physical properties of textile polymer composite materials. Polymers 2024, 16, 1752.
49. Liu, Q.; Chu, M.; Thuerey, N. ConFIG: towards conflict-free training of physics informed neural networks. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.11104. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.11104. (accessed 24 Mar 2026).
50. Sidhu, S. S.; Singh, H.; Gepreel, M. A. A review on alloy design, biological response, and strengthening of β-titanium alloys as biomaterials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 2021, 121, 111661.
51. Zou, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, L.; et al. Integrating machine learning and CALPHAD method for exploring low‐modulus near‐β‐Ti alloys. Rare. Met. 2024, 43, 309-23.
52. Chen, C.; Zuo, Y.; Ye, W.; Li, X.; Deng, Z.; Ong, S. P. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2020, 10, 1903242.
53. Deringer, V. L.; Caro, M. A.; Csányi, G. Machine learning interatomic potentials as emerging tools for materials science. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, e1902765.
54. Schmidt, J.; Marques, M. R. G.; Botti, S.; Marques, M. A. L. Recent advances and applications of machine learning in solid-state materials science. npj. Comput. Mater. 2019, 5, 221.
55. Zhang, Y.; Ren, K.; Wang, W. Y.; et al. Discovering the ultralow thermal conductive A2B2O7-type high-entropy oxides through the hybrid knowledge-assisted data-driven machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 168, 131-42.
56. Yang, Y.; Yang, S.; Wang, H. Effects of microstructure on the evolution of dynamic damage of Fe50Mn30Co10Cr10 high entropy alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2021, 802, 140440.
57. Maresca, F.; Curtin, W. A. Theory of screw dislocation strengthening in random BCC alloys from dilute to “High-Entropy” alloys. Acta. Mater. 2020, 182, 144-62.
58. Qi, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ren, X.; Meng, X.; Pang, B.; Li, Y. Microstructures and dynamic compression properties of a WTaTiCrV refractory high-entropy alloys as an energetic structural materials. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard. Mater. 2025, 130, 107178.
59. Zhu, C.; Li, C.; Wu, D.; et al. A titanium alloys design method based on high-throughput experiments and machine learning. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 2336-53.
60. Luo, Y.; Tang, Y.; Chung, T. F.; et al. Electron work function: an indicative parameter towards a novel material design methodology. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11565.
61. Pant, D.; Aidhy, D. S. Electronic density of states as the descriptor of elastic bond strength, ductility, and local lattice distortion in BCC refractory alloys. Mater. Design. 2025, 253, 113885.
62. Yang, F.; Zhao, W.; Ru, Y.; et al. Transfer learning enables the rapid design of single crystal superalloys with superior creep resistances at ultrahigh temperature. npj. Comput. Mater. 2024, 10, 1349.
63. Khatamsaz, D.; Vela, B.; Singh, P.; Johnson, D. D.; Allaire, D.; Arróyave, R. Multi-objective materials bayesian optimization with active learning of design constraints: design of ductile refractory multi-principal-element alloys. Acta. Mater. 2022, 236, 118133.
64. Greaves, G. N.; Greer, A. L.; Lakes, R. S.; Rouxel, T. Poisson’s ratio and modern materials. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 823-37.
65. Meredig, B.; Agrawal, A.; Kirklin, S.; et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B. 2014, 89, 094104.
66. Hastie, T.; Tibshirani, R.; Friedman, J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd ed.; Springer New York, 2009.
67. Zhang, R.; Wang, W. Y.; Fan, Y.; et al. Knowledge-enabled data-driven smart design advanced high-entropy alloys with attractive dynamic mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. 2025, 60, 567-87.
68. Morales-Hernández, A.; Van Nieuwenhuyse, I.; Rojas Gonzalez, S. A survey on multi-objective hyperparameter optimization algorithms for machine learning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2023, 56, 8043-93.
69. Bobbili, R.; Madhu, V. Constitutive modeling of dynamic flow behavior of Ti-5553 alloy. J. Alloys. Compd. 2019, 787, 260-6.
70. Li, Q. Mechanical properties and microscopic deformation mechanism of polycrystalline magnesium under high-strain-rate compressive loadings. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2012, 540, 130-4.
71. Zhan, H.; Wang, G.; Kent, D.; Dargusch, M. Constitutive modelling of the flow behaviour of a β titanium alloy at high strain rates and elevated temperatures using the Johnson–Cook and modified Zerilli–Armstrong models. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2014, 612, 71-9.
72. Johnson, G. R.; Cook, W. H. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1983, 21, 541-8. https://ia800406.us.archive.org/4/items/AConstitutiveModelAndDataForMetals/A%20constitutive%20model%20and%20data%20for%20metals_text.pdf. (accessed 24 Mar 2026).
73. Johnson, G. R.; Cook, W. H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng. Fract. Mech. 1985, 21, 31-48.
74. Zerilli, F. J.; Armstrong, R. W. Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 61, 1816-25.
