REFERENCES
1. Batra, R.; Song, L.; Ramprasad, R. Emerging materials intelligence ecosystems propelled by machine learning. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 6, 655-78.
2. Rao, Z.; Tung, P. Y.; Xie, R.; et al. Machine learning-enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 2022, 378, 78-85.
3. Sohail, Y.; Zhang, C.; Xue, D.; et al. Machine-learning design of ductile FeNiCoAlTa alloys with high strength. Nature 2025, 643, 119-24.
4. Wang, T.; Pan, R.; Martins, M. L.; et al. Machine-learning-assisted material discovery of oxygen-rich highly porous carbon active materials for aqueous supercapacitors. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 4607.
5. Wu, J.; Torresi, L.; Hu, M.; et al. Inverse design workflow discovers hole-transport materials tailored for perovskite solar cells. Science. 2024, 386, 1256-64.
6. Tian, Y.; Hu, B.; Dang, P.; Pang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Xue, D. Noise-aware active learning to develop high-temperature shape memory alloys with large latent heat. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2406216.
7. Xian, Y.; Dang, P.; Tian, Y.; et al. Compositional design of multicomponent alloys using reinforcement learning. Acta. Mater. 2024, 274, 120017.
8. Wei, Q.; Cao, B.; Yuan, H.; et al. Divide and conquer: machine learning accelerated design of lead-free solder alloys with high strength and high ductility. npj. Comput. Mater. 2023, 9, 201.
9. Gong, X.; Louie, S. G.; Duan, W.; Xu, Y. Generalizing deep learning electronic structure calculation to the plane-wave basis. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2024, 4, 752-60.
10. Dang, L.; He, X.; Tang, D.; Xin, H.; Wu, B. A fatigue life prediction framework of laser-directed energy deposition Ti-6Al-4V based on physics-informed neural network. IJSI 2025, 16, 327-54.
11. Rasul, A.; Karuppanan, S.; Perumal, V.; Ovinis, M.; Iqbal, M. An artificial neural network model for determining stress concentration factors for fatigue design of tubular T-joint under compressive loads. IJSI 2024, 15, 633-52.
12. Yuan, R.; Wang, B.; Li, J.; et al. Machine learning-enabled design of ferroelectrics with multiple properties via a Landau model. Acta. Mater. 2025, 286, 120760.
13. Wang, W.; Jiang, X.; Tian, S.; et al. Automated pipeline for superalloy data by text mining. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 9.
14. Butler, K. T.; Davies, D. W.; Cartwright, H.; Isayev, O.; Walsh, A. Machine learning for molecular and materials science. Nature 2018, 559, 547-55.
15. Raccuglia, P.; Elbert, K. C.; Adler, P. D.; et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature 2016, 533, 73-6.
16. Dinic, F.; Singh, K.; Dong, T.; et al. Applied machine learning for developing next‐generation functional materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104195.
17. Rickman, J.; Lookman, T.; Kalinin, S. Materials informatics: from the atomic-level to the continuum. Acta. Mater. 2019, 168, 473-510.
18. Hong, T.; Chen, T.; Jin, D.; et al. Discovery of new topological insulators and semimetals using deep generative models. npj. Quantum. Mater. 2025, 10, 12.
19. Xie, J. Prospects of materials genome engineering frontiers. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e17.
20. Jiang, X.; Fu, H.; Bai, Y.; et al. Interpretable machine learning applications: a promising prospect of AI for materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2507734.
21. Hart, G. L. W.; Mueller, T.; Toher, C.; Curtarolo, S. Machine learning for alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2021, 6, 730-55.
22. Hippalgaonkar, K.; Li, Q.; Wang, X.; Fisher, J. W.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Buonassisi, T. Knowledge-integrated machine learning for materials: lessons from gameplaying and robotics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2023, 8, 241-60.
23. Tabor, D. P.; Roch, L. M.; Saikin, S. K.; et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 5-20.
24. Gong, X.; Li, H.; Zou, N.; Xu, R.; Duan, W.; Xu, Y. General framework for E(3)-equivariant neural network representation of density functional theory Hamiltonian. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2848.
25. Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Zou, N.; et al. Deep-learning density functional theory Hamiltonian for efficient ab initio electronic-structure calculation. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2022, 2, 367-77.
26. Cohen, A. J.; Mori-Sánchez, P.; Yang, W. Challenges for density functional theory. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 289-320.
27. Janesko, B. G. Replacing hybrid density functional theory: motivation and recent advances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 8470-95.
28. Takeno, S.; Tsukada, Y.; Fukuoka, H.; Koyama, T.; Shiga, M.; Karasuyama, M. Cost-effective search for lower-error region in material parameter space using multifidelity Gaussian process modeling. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2020, 4, 083802.
29. Chen, C.; Zuo, Y.; Ye, W.; Li, X.; Ong, S. P. Learning properties of ordered and disordered materials from multi-fidelity data. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2021, 1, 46-53.
30. Lu, L.; Dao, M.; Kumar, P.; Ramamurty, U.; Karniadakis, G. E.; Suresh, S. Extraction of mechanical properties of materials through deep learning from instrumented indentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020, 117, 7052-62.
31. Jain, A.; Hautier, G.; Moore, C. J.; et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, 50, 2295-310.
32. Pilania, G.; Gubernatis, J.; Lookman, T. Multi-fidelity machine learning models for accurate bandgap predictions of solids. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2017, 129, 156-63.
33. Egorova, O.; Hafizi, R.; Woods, D. C.; Day, G. M. Multifidelity statistical machine learning for molecular crystal structure prediction. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2020, 124, 8065-78.
34. Batra, R.; Pilania, G.; Uberuaga, B. P.; Ramprasad, R. Multifidelity information fusion with machine learning: a case study of dopant formation energies in hafnia. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2019, 11, 24906-18.
35. Jha, D.; Choudhary, K.; Tavazza, F.; et al. Enhancing materials property prediction by leveraging computational and experimental data using deep transfer learning. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5316.
36. Peng, B.; Zhang, M.; Ye, D. DIC/DSI based studies on the local mechanical behaviors of HR3C/T92 dissimilar welded joint during plastic deformation. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 2022, 857, 144073.
37. Valladares, H.; Li, T.; Zhu, L.; et al. Gaussian process-based prognostics of lithium-ion batteries and design optimization of cathode active materials. J. Power. Sources. 2022, 528, 231026.
38. Lindsey, R. K.; Bastea, S.; Hamel, S.; Lyu, Y.; Goldman, N.; Lordi, V. ChIMES carbon 2.0: a transferable machine-learned interatomic model harnessing multifidelity training data. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 26.
39. Ko, T. W.; Ong, S. P. Data-efficient construction of high-fidelity graph deep learning interatomic potentials. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 65.
40. Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; et al. Data-efficient multifidelity training for high-fidelity machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 1042-54.
41. Perdikaris, P.; Raissi, M.; Damianou, A.; Lawrence, N. D.; Karniadakis, G. E. Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017, 473, 20160751.
42. Liu, M.; Gopakumar, A.; Hegde, V. I.; He, J.; Wolverton, C. High-throughput hybrid-functional DFT calculations of bandgaps and formation energies and multifidelity learning with uncertainty quantification. Phys. Rev. Materials. 2024, 8, 043803.
43. Yang, Z.; Zou, J.; Huang, L.; et al. Machine learning-based extraction of mechanical properties from multi-fidelity small punch test data. Adv. Manuf. 2025, 13, 511-24.
44. Yi, J.; Ferreira, B. P.; Bessa, M. A. Single-to-multi-fidelity history-dependent learning with uncertainty quantification and disentanglement: application to data-driven constitutive modeling. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2026, 448, 118479.
45. Yi, J.; Cheng, J.; Bessa, M. A. Practical multi-fidelity machine learning: fusion of deterministic and Bayesian models. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2407.15110. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15110 (accessed 26 March 2026).
46. Cheng, M.; Jiang, P.; Hu, J.; Shu, L.; Zhou, Q. A multi-fidelity surrogate modeling method based on variance-weighted sum for the fusion of multiple non-hierarchical low-fidelity data. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2021, 64, 3797-818.
47. Palizhati, A.; Torrisi, S. B.; Aykol, M.; Suram, S. K.; Hummelshøj, J. S.; Montoya, J. H. Agents for sequential learning using multiple-fidelity data. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4694.
48. Le Gratiet, L. Multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression for computer experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Paris-Diderot - Paris VII, Paris, France, 2013. https://theses.hal.science/tel-00866770/file/manuscrit.pdf (accessed 2026-3-26).
49. Meng, X.; Karniadakis, G. E. A composite neural network that learns from multi-fidelity data: Application to function approximation and inverse PDE problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2020, 401, 109020.
50. Moss, H. B.; Leslie, D. S.; Rayson, P. MUMBO: MUlti-task max-value Bayesian optimization. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases; Hutter, F., Kersting, K., Lijffijt, J., Valera, I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, 2021; pp 447-62.
51. Xu, X.; Zhao, W.; Hu, Y.; et al. Discovery of thermosetting polymers with low hygroscopicity, low thermal expansivity, and high modulus by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 12918-27.
52. Patra, A.; Batra, R.; Chandrasekaran, A.; Kim, C.; Huan, T. D.; Ramprasad, R. A multi-fidelity information-fusion approach to machine learn and predict polymer bandgap. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2020, 172, 109286.
53. Molkeri, A.; Khatamsaz, D.; Couperthwaite, R.; et al. On the importance of microstructure information in materials design: PSP vs PP. Acta. Mater. 2022, 223, 117471.
54. Fare, C.; Fenner, P.; Benatan, M.; Varsi, A.; Pyzer-knapp, E. O. A multi-fidelity machine learning approach to high throughput materials screening. npj. Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 257.
55. He, Y.; Cubuk, E. D.; Allendorf, M. D.; Reed, E. J. Metallic metal-organic frameworks predicted by the combination of machine learning methods and Ab initio calculations. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 4562-9.
56. Yang, J.; Manganaris, P.; Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. Discovering novel halide perovskite alloys using multi-fidelity machine learning and genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Phys. 2024, 160, 064114.
57. Xu, B.; Hu, X.; Lan, H.; et al. Phthalonitrile melting point prediction enabled by multi-fidelity learning. J. Mater. Inf. 2024, 4, 21.
58. He, G.; Zhang, P.; Yin, Z. Active learning inspired multi-fidelity probabilistic modelling of geomaterial property. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2024, 432, 117373.
59. Wang, L.; Zhu, S.; Wu, B.; Xu, Z.; Luo, C.; Wang, Q. Multi-fidelity physics-informed machine learning framework for fatigue life prediction of additive manufactured materials. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2025, 439, 117924.
60. Sabanza-Gil, V.; Barbano, R.; Pacheco Gutiérrez, D.; et al. Best practices for multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization in materials and molecular research. Nat. Comput. Sci. 2025, 5, 572-81.
62. Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Information Science and Statistics. Springer; 2006. https://books.google.com/books/about/Pattern_Recognition_and_Machine_Learning.html?id=kTNoQgAACAAJ (accessed 2026-03-26).
63. Yang, B.; Chen, B.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J. Gaussian process fusion method for multi-fidelity data with heterogeneity distribution in aerospace vehicle flight dynamics. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2024, 138, 109228.
64. Sella, V.; Pham, J.; Chaudhuri, A.; Willcox, K. E. Projection-based multifidelity linear regression for data-poor applications. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum; National Harbor, MD & Online; Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2023.
65. Ozbayram, O.; Olivier, A.; Graham-brady, L. Heteroscedastic Gaussian process regression for material structure-property relationship modeling. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2024, 431, 117326.
66. Ibrahim, A.; Ataca, C. Prediction of frequency-dependent optical spectrum for solid materials: a multioutput and multifidelity machine learning approach. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2024, 16, 41145-56.
67. Mora, C.; Eweis-labolle, J. T.; Johnson, T.; Gadde, L.; Bostanabad, R. Probabilistic neural data fusion for learning from an arbitrary number of multi-fidelity data sets. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023, 415, 116207.
68. Zanjani Foumani Z, Shishehbor M, Yousefpour A, Bostanabad R. Multi-fidelity cost-aware Bayesian optimization. Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2023, 407, 115937.
69. Toal, D. J. J. Some considerations regarding the use of multi-fidelity Kriging in the construction of surrogate models. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2014, 51, 1223-45.
70. Gratiet, L. L.; Garnier, J. Recursive Co-Kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity. Int. J. Uncertain. Quant. 2014, 4, 365-86.
71. Forrester, A. I.; Sóbester, A.; Keane, A. J. Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2007, 463, 3251-69.
72. Xiao, M.; Zhang, G.; Breitkopf, P.; Villon, P.; Zhang, W. Extended Co-Kriging interpolation method based on multi-fidelity data. Appl. Math. Comput. 2018, 323, 120-31.
73. Lu, C. K.; Shafto, P. Conditional deep gaussian processes: multi-fidelity kernel learning. Entropy 2021, 23, 1545.
74. Cutajar, K.; Pullin, M.; Damianou, A.; Lawrence, N.; González, J. Deep Gaussian processes for multi-fidelity modeling. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.07320. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.07320 (accessed 26 March 2026).
75. Raissi, M.; Karniadakis, G. Deep multi-fidelity Gaussian processes. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1604.07484. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.07484 (accessed 26 March 2026).
76. Song, X.; Lv, L.; Sun, W.; Zhang, J. A radial basis function-based multi-fidelity surrogate model: exploring correlation between high-fidelity and low-fidelity models. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2019, 60, 965-81.
77. Acar, P. Crystal plasticity model calibration for Ti-7Al alloy with a multi-fidelity computational scheme. Integr. Mater. Manuf. Innov. 2018, 7, 186-94.
78. Shah, A. A.; Leung, P. K.; Xing, W. W. Rapid high-fidelity quantum simulations using multi-step nonlinear autoregression and graph embeddings. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 57.
79. Pan, W.; Sun, L.; Guo, C.; et al. An efficient/accurate multi-scale fatigue prediction method for Metal-Polymer hybrid (MPH) interface. Int. J. Fatigue. 2024, 184, 108304.
80. Saunders, R. N.; Teferra, K.; Elwany, A.; Michopoulos, J. G.; Lagoudas, D. Metal AM process-structure-property relational linkages using Gaussian process surrogates. Additive. Manuf. 2023, 62, 103398.
81. Morse, L.; Khodaei, Z. S.; Aliabadi, M. A multi-fidelity modelling approach to the statistical inference of the equivalent initial flaw size distribution for multiple-site damage. Int. J. Fatigue. 2019, 120, 329-41.
82. Tran, A.; Tranchida, J.; Wildey, T.; Thompson, A. P. Multi-fidelity machine-learning with uncertainty quantification and Bayesian optimization for materials design: application to ternary random alloys. J. Chem. Phys. 2020, 153, 074705.
83. Menon, N.; Mondal, S.; Basak, A. Multi-fidelity surrogate-based process mapping with uncertainty quantification in laser directed energy deposition. Materials 2022, 15, 2902.
84. Wiangkham, A.; Aengchuan, P.; Kasemsri, R.; Pichitkul, A.; Tantrairatn, S.; Ariyarit, A. Improvement of mixed-mode I/II fracture toughness modeling prediction performance by using a multi-fidelity surrogate model based on fracture criteria. Materials 2022, 15, 8580.
85. Howard, A. A.; Perego, M.; Karniadakis, G. E.; Stinis, P. Multifidelity deep operator networks for data-driven and physics-informed problems. J. Comput. Phys. 2023, 493, 112462.
86. Motamed, M. A multi-fidelity neural network surrogate sampling method for uncertainty quantification. arXiv 2020, arXiv:1909.01859. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.01859 (accessed 26 March 2026).
87. Song, D. H.; Tartakovsky, D. M. Transfer Learning on Multi-Fidelity Data. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.00856. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00856 (accessed 26 March 2026).
88. Chakraborty, S. Transfer learning based multi-fidelity physics informed deep neural network. J. Comput. Phys. 2021, 426, 109942.
89. Snapp, K. L.; Silverman, S.; Pang, R.; et al. A physics-informed impact model refined by multi-fidelity transfer learning. Extreme. Mechanics. Letters. 2024, 72, 102223.
90. Chen, D.; Li, Y.; Liu, K.; Li, Y. A physics-informed neural network approach to fatigue life prediction using small quantity of samples. Int. J. Fatigue. 2023, 166, 107270.
91. Islam, M.; Thakur, M. S. H.; Mojumder, S.; Hasan, M. N. Extraction of material properties through multi-fidelity deep learning from molecular dynamics simulation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2021, 188, 110187.
92. Liu, B.; Yang, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, Y. A method for calculating residual strength of crack arrest hole on tungsten-copper functionally graded materials by phase-field gradient element combined with multi-fidelity neural network. Materials 2025, 18, 1973.
93. De Breuck P, Heymans G, Rignanese G. Accurate experimental band gap predictions with multifidelity correction learning. J. Mater. Inf. 2022, 2, 10.
94. Cleeman, J.; Agrawala, K.; Nastarowicz, E.; Malhotra, R. Partial-physics-informed multi-fidelity modeling of manufacturing processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2023, 320, 118125.
95. Khatamsaz, D.; Molkeri, A.; Couperthwaite, R.; et al. Adaptive active subspace-based efficient multifidelity materials design. Mater. Des. 2021, 209, 110001.
96. Hernández-García, A.; Saxena, N.; Jain, M.; Liu, C. H.; Bengio, Y. Multi-Fidelity Active Learning with GFlowNets. 2024. https://openreview.net/forum?id=dLaazW9zuF (accessed 2026-03-26).
97. Koutsourelakis, P. Accurate uncertainty quantification using inaccurate computational models. SIAM. J. Sci. Comput. 2009, 31, 3274-300.
98. Wang, Z.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, T.; He, Y. Exploring multi-fidelity data in materials science: challenges, applications, and optimized learning strategies. Applied. Sciences. 2023, 13, 13176.
99. Greenman, K. P.; Green, W. H.; Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Multi-fidelity prediction of molecular optical peaks with deep learning. Chem. Sci. 2022, 13, 1152-62.
100. Burdick, R. K.; Borror, C. M.; Montgomery, D. C. A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis. J. Qual. Technol. 2018, 35, 342-54.
101. Giannoukou, K.; Marelli, S.; Sudret, B. Uncertainty-aware multi-fidelity surrogate modeling with noisy data. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2401.06447. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06447 (accessed 26 March 2026).
102. Konomi, B. A.; Karagiannis, G. Bayesian analysis of multifidelity computer models with local features and non-nested experimental designs: application to the WRF model. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1910.08063. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.08063 (accessed 26 March 2026).
103. Zhou, Q.; Wu, Y.; Guo, Z.; Hu, J.; Jin, P. A generalized hierarchical co-Kriging model for multi-fidelity data fusion. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 2020, 62, 1885-904.
