REFERENCES
1. Celina, M. C. Review of polymer oxidation and its relationship with materials performance and lifetime prediction. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2013, 98, 2419-29.
2. Li, D.; Xu, S.; Li, J. Effect of thermal oxygen aging on the crystallization and insulation properties of polyether ether ketone. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2023, 140, e53745.
3. Ghaderi, A.; Ayoub, G.; Dargazany, R. Constitutive behavior and failure prediction of crosslinked polymers exposed to concurrent fatigue and thermal aging: a reduced-order knowledge-driven machine-learned model. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 59, 5066-84.
4. Tsotsis, T. K.; Keller, S.; Bardis, J.; Bish, J. Preliminary evaluation of the use of elevated pressure to accelerate thermo-oxidative aging in composites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 64, 207-12.
5. Ye, Y.; Tang, G.; Meng, X.; Yang, R.; Guo, B.; Xie, X. Efficient and precise outdoor lifetime prediction method for biodegradable poly (butylene adipate/ terephthalate) under various climate conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 500, 145276.
6. Wang, X.; Petrů, M. Degradation of bending properties of flax fiber reinforced polymer after natural aging and accelerated aging. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 240, 117909.
7. Yu, H.; Zhang, D.; Cui, L.; Kong, Y.; Jiao, X. A Mach. Learn. approach for efficiently predicting polymer aging from UV-vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2024, 128, 9255-61.
8. Sharma, H.; Arora, G.; Singh, M. K.; et al. Review of Mach. Learn. approaches for predicting mechanical behavior of composite materials. Discov. Appl. Sci. 2025, 7, 1238.
9. Bernstein, R.; Derzon, D. K.; Gillen, K. T. Nylon 6.6 accelerated aging studies: thermal-oxidative degradation and its interaction with hydrolysis. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 88, 480-8.
10. Yarahmadi, N.; Vega, A.; Jakubowicz, I. Accelerated ageing and degradation characteristics of rigid polyurethane foam. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 138, 192-200.
11. Richaud, E.; Farcas, F.; Fayolle, B.; Audouin, L.; Verdu, J. Accelerated ageing of polypropylene stabilized by phenolic antioxidants under high oxygen pressure. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 110, 3313-21.
12. Courvoisier, E.; Bicaba, Y.; Colin, X. Multi-scale and multi-technical analysis of the thermal degradation of poly(ether imide). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 147, 177-86.
13. Courvoisier, E.; Bicaba, Y.; Colin, X. Multi-scale and multi-technique analysis of the thermal degradation of poly(ether ether ketone). Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2018, 151, 65-79.
14. Faulkner, D. L. Aging of polypropylene using high oxygen pressure: Influence of sample thickness and stabilization. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1986, 31, 2129-38.
15. Zha, S.; Lan, H.; Lin, N.; Meng, T. Degradation and characterization methods for polyethylene gas pipes after natural and accelerated aging. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2023, 208, 110247.
16. Colin, X.; Essatbi, F.; Delozanne, J.; Moreau, G. A new analytical model for predicting the thermal oxidation kinetics of composite organic m atrices. Application to diamine cross-linked epoxy. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2021, 186, 109513.
17. Colin, X.; Marais, C.; Verdu, J. Thermal oxidation kinetics for a poly(bismaleimide). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 82, 3418-30.
18. Omairey, E. L.; Zhang, Y.; Soenen, H.; Carbonneau, X. Parametric analysis and field validations of oxidative ageing in asphalt pavements using multiphysics modelling approaches. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2022, 24, 2020267.
19. Cassola, S.; Duhovic, M.; Schmidt, T.; May, D. Mach. Learn. for polymer composites process simulation - a review. Compos. Part B Eng. 2022, 246, 110208.
20. Linde, E.; Nilsson, F.; Barrett, M.; Hedenqvist, M. S.; Celina, M. C. Time- and feedback-dependent DLO phenomena in oxidative polymer aging. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2021, 189, 109598.
21. Li, X.; Dong, C.; Li, J.; Bin, G.; Zhou, C. Molecular dynamics simulation of aging properties in polymer materials: a review. Polym. Bull. 2024, 82, 1723-53.
22. Fang, C.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Shen, T.; Du, J. Multi-scale model for the aging performance of particle-filled polymer composites. Polymers. 2023, 15.
23. Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Zhang, C. Applications of artificial intelligence/machine learning to high-performance composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2024, 285, 111740.
24. Wang, Y.; Lan, H.; Meng, T.; Chen, S.; Zuo, J.; Lin, N. A lifetime prediction method of pressured gas polyethylene pipes by thermal-oxidative aging test and tensile test. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2018, 140, 011404.
25. Wang, Y.; Lan, H.; Meng, T. Lifetime prediction of natural gas polyethylene pipes with internal pressures. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2019, 95, 154-63.
26. Ran, W.; Niu, L.; Wang, Y.; Lin, N.; Feng, G.; Lan, H. A lifetime prediction method of pressured gas polyethylene pipes by strain-hardening modulus and tensile test. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 7965.
27. Feng, Y.; Hu, J.; Peng, C.; Wu, Q.; Xu, Z. High dual-aging-resistant property obtained in silica fume filled epoxy based composite and its lifetime prediction by aging model. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 6, 016303.
28. Hao, Z.; Feng, P.; Zhang, S.; Zhai, Y. Machine learning for predicting fiber-reinforced polymer durability: a critical review and future directions. Compos. Part B Eng. 2025, 303, 112587.
29. Bernstein, R.; Gillen, K. Nylon 6.6 accelerating aging studies: II. Long-term thermal-oxidative and hydrolysis results. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2010, 95, 1471-9.
30. Xu, H.; Tian, T.; Zhang, J.; et al. Hot deformation behavior of the 25CrMo4 steel using a modified arrhenius model. Materials. 2022, 15, 2820.
31. Celina, M.; Gillen, K.; Assink, R. Accelerated aging and lifetime prediction: review of non-arrhenius behaviour due to two competing processes. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2005, 90, 395-404.
32. Ciutacu, S.; Budrugeac, P.; Niculae, I. Accelerated thermal aging of glass-reinforced epoxy resin under oxygen pressure. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1991, 31, 365-72.
33. Starkova, O.; Gagani, A. I.; Karl, C. W.; Rocha, I. B. C. M.; Burlakovs, J.; Krauklis, A. E. Modelling of Environmental Ageing of Polymers and Polymer Composites-Durability Prediction Methods. Polymers. 2022, 14, 907.
34. Xu, P.; Ma, Y.; Lu, W.; Li, M.; Zhao, W.; Dai, Z. Multi-objective optimization in Mach. Learn. assisted materials design and discovery. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 26.
35. Nasrin, T.; Pourkamali‐anaraki, F.; Peterson, A. M. Application of Mach. Learn. in polymer additive manufacturing: a review. J. Polym. Sci. 2023, 62, 2639-69.
36. Das, P. P.; Rabby, M. M.; Vadlamudi, V.; Raihan, R. Moisture content prediction in polymer composites using Mach. Learn. techniques. Polymers. 2022, 14, 4403.
37. Cui, C.; Wang, H.; Gao, X.; Cao, G.; Liu, Z. Mach. Learn. model for thickness evolution of oxide scale during hot strip rolling of steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2021, 52, 4112-24.
38. Gubernatis, J. E.; Lookman, T. Mach. Learn. in materials design and discovery: examples from the present and suggestions for the future. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2018, 2, 120301.
39. Taffese, W. Z.; Wally, G. B.; Magalhães, F. C.; Espinosa-leal, L. Concrete aging factor prediction using Mach. Learn. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 40, 109527.
40. Peng, L.; Miao, X.; Zhu, J.; et al. Hybrid Mach. Learn. and multi-objective optimization for intelligent design of green and low-carbon concrete. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2025, 45, e01605.
41. Zhu, K.; Wu, D.; Yang, S.; et al. Identification of aged polypropylene with Mach. Learn. and near-infrared spectroscopy for improved recycling. Polymers. 2025, 17, 700.
42. Wang, J.; Karimi, S.; Zeinalzad, P.; Zhang, J.; Gong, Z. Using Mach. Learn. and experimental study to correlate and predict accelerated aging with natural aging of GFRP composites in hygrothermal conditions. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024, 438, 137264.
43. Nematov, D.; Hojamberdiev, M. Mach. Learn.-driven materials discovery: unlocking next-generation functional materials - a review. Comput. Condens. Matter 2025, 45, e01139.
44. Luo, D.; Wang, K.; Wang, D.; Sharma, A.; Li, W.; Choi, I. H. Artificial intelligence in the design, optimization, and performance prediction of concrete materials: a comprehensive review. npj Mater. Sustain. 2025, 3, 14.
45. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W. Mach. Learn. in gel-based additive manufacturing: from material design to process optimization. Gels 2025, 11, 582.
46. Lundberg, S. M.; Lee, S. I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html. (accessed 2026-04-13).
47. Lundberg, S. M.; Erion, G. G.; Lee, S. I. Consistent individualized feature attribution for tree ensembles. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1802.03888.
48. Zhong, X.; Gallagher, B.; Liu, S.; Kailkhura, B.; Hiszpanski, A.; Han, T. Y. Explainable Mach. Learn. in materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 2022, 8, 204.
49. Hu, W.; Jing, E.; Qiu, H.; Sun, Z. Discovering polyimides and their composites with targeted mechanical properties through explainable Mach. Learn. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 1.
50. Zhu, P.; Li, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Qu, W. Prediction of the long-term tensile strength of GFRP bars in concrete. Buildings 2023, 13, 1035.
51. Jia, N.; Kagan, V. A. Effects of time and temperature on the tension‐tension fatigue behavior of short fiber reinforced polyamides. Polym. Compos. 1998, 19, 408-14.
52. Asteris, P. G.; Apostolopoulou, M.; Armaghani, D. J.; et al. On the metaheuristic models for the prediction of cement-metakaolin mortars compressive strength. Metaheuristic Comput. Appl. 2020, 1, 063-99. https://www.techno-press.org/content/?page=article&journal=mca&volume=1&num=1&ordernum=4 (accessed 2026-04-13).
53. Mouawad, F.; Homsi, F.; Geara, F.; Mina, R. Predicting compressive strength of sustainable concrete using Mach. Learn. and artificial neural networks. Constr. Mater. 2025, 5, 56.
54. Joo, C.; Park, H.; Kwon, H.; et al. Mach. Learn. approach to predict physical properties of polypropylene composites: application of MLR, DNN, and random forest to industrial data. Polymers. 2022, 14.
55. Malashin I, Tynchenko V, Gantimurov A, et al. Boosting-based machine learning applications in polymer science: a review. Polymers 2025, 17, 499.
58. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. 2001, 29, 1189-232. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2699986 (accessed 2026-04-13).
59. Chen, T.; Guestrin, C. Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In KDD’16: Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining; 2016, 785-94.
60. Ke, G.; Meng, Q.; Finley, T.; et al. Lightgbm: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in neural information processing systems; 2017, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Abstract.html. (accessed 2026-04-13).
61. Dorogush, A. V.; Ershov, V.; Gulin, A. CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1810.11363.
62. Schölkopf, B.; Smola, A. J. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond; MIT press Cambridge, MA, USA.: 2002. https://books.google.com/books?id=y8ORL3DWt4sC&printsec=frontcover&hl=zh-CN#v=onepage&q&f=false (accessed 2026-04-13).
63. Wu, S.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; et al. Concentration prediction of polymer insulation aging indicator-alcohols in oil based on genetic algorithm-optimized support vector machines. Polymers. 2022, 14, 1449.
64. Drucker, H.; Burges, C. J. C.; Kaufman, L.; Smola, A. J.; Vapnik, V. Support vector regression machines. In Advances in neural information processing systems, 1996, 9, 155-61.
65. Cover, T.; Hart, P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1967, 13, 21-7.
