REFERENCES

1. Aust, J.; Pons, D. Taxonomy of gas turbine blade defects. Aerospace 2019, 6, 58.

2. Han, K.; Tan, L.; Yao, C.; Zhang, D. Evolution and anti-fatigue mechanism of surface characteristics of Ti60 alloy induced by ball burnishing and shot peening during tensile-compression fatigue. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2024, 159, 108136.

3. Zhang, T.; Wang, W.; Dong, R.; et al. Physics-guided neural network for grinding temperature prediction. J. Eng. Design. 2024, 36, 707-30.

4. Sun, Y.; Yao, C.; Tan, L.; et al. Surface integrity and fatigue failure behavior of nickel based alloy blades: after cutting, vibration finishing and shot peening. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2025, 167, 109034.

5. Ma, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. SPDP-Net: a semantic prior guided defect perception network for automated aero-engine blades surface visual inspection. IEEE. Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 2025, 22, 2724-33.

6. Shang, H.; Sun, C.; Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Yan, R. Defect-aware transformer network for intelligent visual surface defect detection. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2023, 55, 101882.

7. Wang, W. Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, G.; et al. Artificial intelligence enabled smart design and manufacturing of advanced materials: the endless Frontier in AI⁺ era. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2024, 2, e56.

8. Wang, W. Y.; Li, G.; Liu, Z.; et al. Materials genome engineering and intelligent science: the endless frontier in AI+ era. Sci. Technol. Rev. 2025, 43, 93-109.

9. Huang, K.; Zeng, Y.; Zhao, J.; et al. Weakly supervised complex texture defect detection based on nested U-Net architecture. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 2025, 44, 24.

10. Abdulrahman, Y.; Eltoum, M. A. M.; Ayyad, A.; Moyo, B.; Zweiri, Y. Aero-engine blade defect detection: a systematic review of deep learning models. IEEE. Access. 2023, 11, 53048-61.

11. Hu, S.; Ma, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, W. Application of self-supervised learning in steel surface defect detection. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 44.

12. Wu, Z.; Wu, S.; Kruzic, J. J.; et al. Critical damage events of 3D printed AlSi10Mg alloy via in situ synchrotron X-ray tomography. Acta. Mater. 2025, 282, 120464.

13. Li, D.; Li, Y.; Xie, Q.; Wu, Y.; Yu, Z.; Wang, J. Tiny defect detection in high-resolution aero-engine blade images via a coarse-to-fine framework. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2021, 70, 1-12.

14. Li, X.; Wang, C.; Ju, H.; Li, Z. Surface defect detection model for aero-engine components based on improved YOLOv5. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7235.

15. Song, K.; Sun, X.; Ma, S.; Yan, Y. Surface defect detection of aeroengine blades based on cross-layer semantic guidance. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 72, 1-11.

16. Shang, H.; Yang, Q.; Sun, C.; Chen, X.; Yan, R. Superpixel perception graph neural network for intelligent defect detection of aero-engine blade. J. Manuf. Syst. 2024, 77, 112-26.

17. Sun, X.; Song, K.; Wen, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, Y. SDD-DETR: surface defect detection for no-service aero-engine blades with detection transformer. IEEE. Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 2025, 22, 6984-97.

18. Zong, Y.; Liang, J.; Wang, H.; et al. An intelligent and automated 3D surface defect detection system for quantitative 3D estimation and feature classification of material surface defects. Opt. Lasers. Eng. 2021, 144, 106633.

19. Aggour, K. S.; Gupta, V. K.; Ruscitto, D.; et al. Artificial intelligence/machine learning in manufacturing and inspection: a GE perspective. MRS. Bull. 2019, 44, 545-58.

20. Zhang, S.; Wang, W. Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Large language models enabled intelligent microstructure optimization and defects classification of welded titanium alloys. J. Mater. Inf. 2024, 4, 34.

21. Wang, Y.; Peng, T.; Wang, W.; Luo, M. High-efficient view planning for surface inspection based on parallel deep reinforcement learning. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2023, 55, 101849.

22. Du, Z.; Gao, L.; Li, X. A new contrastive GAN with data augmentation for surface defect recognition under limited data. IEEE. Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2023, 72, 1-13.

23. Liu, L.; Cao, D.; Wu, Y.; Wei, T. Defective samples simulation through adversarial training for automatic surface inspection. Neurocomputing 2019, 360, 230-45.

24. Ren, W.; Song, K.; Chen, C.; et al. DD-Aug: a knowledge-to-image synthetic data augmentation pipeline for industrial defect detection. IEEE. Trans. Ind. Inf. 2025, 21, 2284-93.

25. He, R.; Sun, S.; Yu, X.; et al. Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? arXiv 2023, arXiv:2210.07574. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.07574. (accessed 4 Mar 2026).

26. Singh, A. R.; Bashford-Rogers, T.; Hazra, S.; Debattista, K. Generating synthetic training images to detect split defects in stamped components. IEEE. Trans. Ind. Inf. 2024, 20, 4816-27.

27. Bosnar, L.; Hagen, H.; Gospodnetic, P. Procedural defect modeling for virtual surface inspection environments. IEEE. Comput. Graph. Appl. 2023, 43, 13-22.

28. Manyar, O. M.; Cheng, J.; Levine, R.; Krishnan, V.; Barbič, J.; Gupta, S. K. Physics informed synthetic image generation for deep learning-based detection of wrinkles and folds. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng. 2023, 23, 030903.

29. Abou Akar, C.; Tekli, J.; Khalil, J.; et al. SORDI.ai: large-scale synthetic object recognition dataset generation for industries. Multimed. Tools. Appl. 2024, 84, 18263-304.

30. Gutierrez, P.; Luschkova, M.; Cordier, A.; Shukor, M.; Schappert, M.; Dahmen, T. Synthetic training data generation for deep learning based quality inspection. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2104.02980. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.02980. (accessed 4 Mar 2026).

31. Fulir, J.; Bosnar, L.; Hagen, H.; Gospodnetić, P. Synthetic data for defect segmentation on complex metal surfaces. In 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), Vancouver, Canada, June 17-24, 2023. IEEE; 2023. pp. 4424-34.

32. Schraml, D.; Notni, G. Synthetic training data in AI-driven quality inspection: the significance of camera, lighting, and noise parameters. Sensors 2024, 24, 649.

33. Bosch, C.; Pueyo, X.; Mérillou, S.; Ghazanfarpour, D. A physically-based model for rendering realistic scratches. Comput. Graph. Forum. 2004, 23, 361-70.

34. He, L.; Gao, F.; Hou, W.; Hao, L. Objective image quality assessment: a survey. Int. J. Comput. Math. 2013, 91, 2374-88.

35. Xie, E.; Wang, W.; Yu, Z.; Anandkumar, A.; Alvarez, J. M.; Luo, P. SegFormer: simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2105.15203. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.15203. (accessed 4 Mar 2026).

36. Weng, W.; Zhu, X. INet: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. IEEE. Access. 2021, 9, 16591-603.

37. Chen, L. C.; Zhu, Y.; Papandreou, G.; Schroff, F.; Adam, H. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In: Ferrari V, Hebert M, Sminchisescu C, Weiss Y, Editors. Computer Vision - ECCV 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 833-51.

38. Badrinarayanan, V.; Kendall, A.; Cipolla, R. SegNet: a deep convolutional encoder-decoder architecture for image segmentation. IEEE. Trans. Pattern. Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017, 39, 2481-95.

39. Mirza, M.; Osindero, S. Conditional generative adversarial nets. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1411.1784. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.1784. (accessed 4 Mar 2026).

40. Niu, T.; Li, B.; Li, W.; Qiu, Y.; Niu, S. Positive-sample-based surface defect detection using memory-augmented adversarial autoencoders. IEEE/ASME. Trans. Mechatron. 2022, 27, 46-57.