REFERENCES
1. Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Cao, X.; et al. Artificial intelligence: a powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation 2021, 2, 100179.
2. Maqsood, A.; Chen, C.; Jacobsson, T. J. The future of material scientists in an age of artificial intelligence. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2401401.
3. Wang W, Li J, Liu W, Liu Z. Integrated computational materials engineering for advanced materials: a brief review. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 158, 42-8.
4. Panchal, J. H.; Kalidindi, S. R.; Mcdowell, D. L. Key computational modeling issues in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering. Comput. Aided. Des. 2013, 45, 4-25.
5. Ong, S. P. Accelerating materials science with high-throughput computations and machine learning. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2019, 161, 143-50.
6. Ren, F.; Ward, L.; Williams, T.; et al. Accelerated discovery of metallic glasses through iteration of machine learning and high-throughput experiments. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaaq1566.
7. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Machine learning assisted identification of homobilayer sliding ferroelectrics with large out-of-plane polarization and low sliding energy barriers. Phys. Rev. B. 2025, 111.
8. van der Giessen, E.; Schultz, P. A.; Bertin, N.; et al. Roadmap on multiscale materials modeling. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 28, 043001.
9. Botifoll, M.; Pinto-Huguet, I.; Arbiol, J. Machine learning in electron microscopy for advanced nanocharacterization: current developments, available tools and future outlook. Nanoscale. Horiz. 2022, 7, 1427-77.
10. Paier, J.; Marsman, M.; Hummer, K.; Kresse, G.; Gerber, I. C.; Angyán, J. G. Screened hybrid density functionals applied to solids. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 154709.
11. Aykol, M.; Kim, S.; Hegde, V. I.; et al. High-throughput computational design of cathode coatings for Li-ion batteries. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13779.
12. Jang, S. H.; Tateyama, Y.; Jalem, R. High‐throughput data‐driven prediction of stable high‐performance Na‐ion sulfide solid electrolytes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2206036.
13. Benayad, A.; Diddens, D.; Heuer, A.; et al. High‐throughput experimentation and computational freeway lanes for accelerated battery electrolyte and interface development research. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2022, 12, 2102678.
14. Boyd, P. G.; Lee, Y.; Smit, B. Computational development of the nanoporous materials genome. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, BFnatrevmats201737.
15. Lafferentz, L.; Eberhardt, V.; Dri, C.; et al. Controlling on-surface polymerization by hierarchical and substrate-directed growth. Nat. Chem. 2012, 4, 215-20.
16. Xu, D.; Zhang, Q.; Huo, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, M. Advances in data‐assisted high‐throughput computations for material design. Mater. Genome. Eng. Adv. 2023, 1, e11.
17. Shu, Y.; Miao, N.; Li, R.; et al. Machine learning-enabled optoelectronic material discovery: a comprehensive review. J. Mater. Inf. 2025, 5, 36.
18. Wang, X.; Wang, P.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Shen, L. Data-driven discovery of high-performance heterobilayer transition metal dichalcogenide-based sliding ferroelectrics. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 7164-73.
19. Garrity, K. F.; Bennett, J. W.; Rabe, K. M.; Vanderbilt, D. Pseudopotentials for high-throughput DFT calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2014, 81, 446-52.
20. Jain, A.; Hautier, G.; Moore, C. J.; et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2011, 50, 2295-310.
21. Calderon, C. E.; Plata, J. J.; Toher, C.; et al. The AFLOW standard for high-throughput materials science calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2015, 108, 233-8.
22. Xu, Y.; Elcoro, L.; Song, Z. D.; et al. High-throughput calculations of magnetic topological materials. Nature 2020, 586, 702-7.
23. Naveed, H.; Khan, A. U.; Qiu, S.; et al. A comprehensive overview of large language models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2307.06435. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06435 (accessed 23 January 2026).
24. Chang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; et al. A survey on evaluation of large language models. ACM. Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2024, 15, 1-45.
25. Tian, S.; Jiang, X.; Wang, W.; et al. Steel design based on a large language model. Acta. Mater. 2025, 285, 120663.
26. Jiang, X.; Wang, W.; Tian, S.; Wang, H.; Lookman, T.; Su, Y. Applications of natural language processing and large language models in materials discovery. npj. Comput. Mater. 2025, 11, 1554.
27. Hewitt, C.; Bishop, P.; Steiger, R. A universal modular ACTOR formalism for artificial intelligence. In Proceedings of the 3rd international joint conference on Artificial intelligence, Stanford, CA, USA, August 20-23, 1973; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1973; Vol. 3, pp 235-45. https://www.eighty-twenty.org/files/Hewitt,%20Bishop,%20Steiger%20-%201973%20-%20A%20universal%20modular%20ACTOR%20formalism%20for%20artificial%20intelligence.pdf (accessed 2026-01-23).
28. Zhao, W. X.; Zhou, K.; Li, J.; et al. A survey of large language models. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2303.18223. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.18223 (accessed 23 January 2026).
29. Sapkota, R.; Roumeliotis, K. I.; Karkee, M. AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: a conceptual taxonomy, applications and challenges. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.10468. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.10468 (accessed 23 January 2026).
30. Barua, S. Exploring autonomous agents through the lens of large language models: a review. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2404.04442. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.04442 (accessed 23 January 2026).
31. Wu, J.; Or, C. K. Position paper: towards open complex Human-AI Agents Collaboration System for problem-solving and knowledge management. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.00018. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.00018 (accessed 23 January 2026).
32. Fu, J.; Liu, X.; Cai, W.; Fu, H.; Shao, X. SpeLL: an agent for natural language-driven intelligent spectral modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 7844-50.
33. Huang, H.; Shi, X.; Lei, H.; Hu, F.; Cai, Y. ProtChat: an AI multi-agent for automated protein analysis leveraging GPT-4 and protein language model. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 62-70.
34. Ansari, M.; Watchorn, J.; Brown, C. E.; Brown, J. S. dziner: rational inverse design of materials with AI Agents. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.03963. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.03963 (accessed 23 January 2026).
35. Hu, B.; Liu, S.; Ye, B.; Hao, Y.; Wen, T. A multi-agent framework for materials laws discovery. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2411.16416. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.16416 (accessed 23 January 2026).
36. Ansari, M.; Moosavi, S. M. Agent-based learning of materials datasets from the scientific literature. Digit. Discov. 2024, 3, 2607-17.
37. Bai, X.; Wang, H.; Xie, L.; et al. An integrated AI system for multi-objective screening of MOF materials. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 376, 133939.
38. Ramos, M. C.; Collison, C. J.; White, A. D. A review of large language models and autonomous agents in chemistry. Chem. Sci. 2025, 16, 2514-72.
39. Yao, S.; Zhao, J.; Yu, D.; et al. ReAct: synergizing reasoning and acting in language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023; OpenReview.net: Alameda, CA, USA, 2023. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10451467 (accessed 2026-01-23).
40. Hou, X.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, H. Model context protocol (MCP): landscape, security threats, and future research directions. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2503.23278. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.23278 (accessed 23 January 2026).
41. Yang, A.; Li, A.; Yang, B.; Zhang, B.; Hui, B.; Zheng, B.; et al. Qwen3 technical report. arXiv 2025, arXiv:2505.09388. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09388 (accessed 23 January 2026).
42. Bento, A. P.; Hersey, A.; Félix, E.; et al. An open source chemical structure curation pipeline using RDKit. J. Cheminform. 2020, 12, 51.
43. Ong, S. P.; Richards, W. D.; Jain, A.; et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2013, 68, 314-9.
44. Jain, A.; Ong, S. P.; Hautier, G.; et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL. Mater. 2013, 1, 011002.
45. Kim, S.; Thiessen, P. A.; Bolton, E. E.; et al. PubChem Substance and Compound databases. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 2016, 44, D1202-13.
46. Ramakrishnan, R.; Dral, P. O.; Rupp, M.; von, Lilienfeld. O. A. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Sci. Data. 2014, 1, 140022.
47. Gjerding, M. N.; Taghizadeh, A.; Rasmussen, A.; et al. Recent progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB). 2D. Mater. 2021, 8, 044002.
48. Greenspan, J.; Bulger, B. MySQL/PHP database applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. ISBN: 9780130893874. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/558011 (accessed 2026-01-23).
49. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; et al. Gaussian 16, Revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016. https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/ (accessed 2026-01-23).
50. Furche, F.; Ahlrichs, R.; Hättig, C.; Klopper, W.; Sierka, M.; Weigend, F. Turbomole. WIREs. Comput. Mol. Sci. 2014, 4, 91-100.
51. Bannwarth, C.; Ehlert, S.; Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB - an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2019, 15, 1652-71.
52. Kresse, G.; Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter. 1996, 54, 11169-86.
53. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 1995, 117, 1-19.
54. Lu, T.; Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580-92.
56. Pedregosa, F.; Varoquaux, G.; Gramfort, A.; et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011, 12, 2825-30. https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume12/pedregosa11a/pedregosa11a.pdf?source=post_page (accessed 2026-01-23).
57. Balandat, M.; Karrer, B.; Jiang, D. R.; et al. BoTorch: a framework for efficient Monte Carlo Bayesian optimization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), Virtual Format, December 6-12, 2020; Curran Associates, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2020; Vol. 33, pp 21524-38. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/f5b1b89d98b7286673128a5fb112cb9a-Abstract.html (accessed 2026-01-23).
58. Sohn, K.; Lee, H.; Yan, X. Learning structured output representation using deep conditional generative models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28 (NIPS 2015), Montreal, Canada, December 7-12, 2015; Curran Associates, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2015. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2015/hash/8d55a249e6baa5c06772297520da2051-Abstract.html (accessed 2026-01-23).
59. Kipf, T. N.; Welling, M. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv 2016, arXiv:1609.02907. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.02907 (accessed 23 January 2026).
60. Velickovic, P.; Cucurull, G.; Casanova, A.; Romero, A.; Lio, P.; Bengio, Y. Graph attention networks. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1710.10903. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1710.10903 (accessed 23 January 2026).
61. Gasteiger, J.; Groß, J.; Günnemann, S. Directional message passing for molecular graphs. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2003.03123. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.03123 (accessed 23 January 2026).
62. Xie, T.; Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 120, 145301.
63. Paszke, A.; Gross, S.; Massa, F.; et al. PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019), Vancouver, Canada, December 8-14, 2019; Curran Associates, Inc.: New York, NY, USA. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/bdbca288fee7f92f2bfa9f7012727740-Abstract.html (accessed 2026-01-23).
64. Fey, M.; Lenssen, J. E. Fast graph representation learning with PyTorch Geometric. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1903.02428. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.02428 (accessed 23 January 2026).
65. Topsakal, O.; Akinci, T. C. Creating large language model applications utilizing LangChain: a primer on developing LLM Apps fast. ICAENS 2023, 1, 1050-6.
66. Abadi, M.; Agarwal, A.; Barham, P.; et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems. 2015. https://www.tensorflow.org/ (accessed 2026-01-23).
67. Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G. H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y. H. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater. Today. 2017, 20, 116-30.
68. Zhang, S. S. A review on electrolyte additives for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power. Sources. 2006, 162, 1379-94.
69. Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865-8.
70. Heyd, J.; Scuseria, G. E.; Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 8207-15.
71. Ermolaev, G. A.; Stebunov, Y. V.; Vyshnevyy, A. A.; et al. Broadband optical properties of monolayer and bulk MoS2. npj. 2D. Mater. Appl. 2020, 4, 155.
72. Winther, K. T.; Thygesen, K. S. Band structure engineering in van der Waals heterostructures via dielectric screening: the GΔW method. 2D. Mater. 2017, 4, 025059.
73. Haregewoin, A. M.; Wotango, A. S.; Hwang, B. Electrolyte additives for lithium ion battery electrodes: progress and perspectives. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1955-88.
74. Gu, Y.; Wu, X.; Gopalakrishna, T. Y.; Phan, H.; Wu, J. Graphene-like molecules with four zigzag edges. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018, 57, 6541-5.
75. Fried, L. E.; Manaa, M. R.; Pagoria, P. F.; Simpson, R. L. Design and synthesis of energetic materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2001, 31, 291-321.
76. Göbel, M.; Klapötke, T. M. Development and testing of energetic materials: the concept of high densities based on the trinitroethyl functionality. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 347-65.
77. Hong, G.; Gan, X.; Leonhardt, C.; et al. A brief history of OLEDs-Emitter development and industry milestones. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2005630.
78. Santos PL, Stachelek P, Takeda Y, Pander P. Recent advances in highly-efficient near infrared OLED emitters. Mater. Chem. Front. 2024, 8, 1731-66.
79. Smith, E. L.; Abbott, A. P.; Ryder, K. S. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) and their applications. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11060-82.
80. Hansen, B. B.; Spittle, S.; Chen, B.; et al. Deep eutectic solvents: a review of fundamentals and applications. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1232-85.
81. Flamme, B.; Rodriguez, Garcia. G.; Weil, M.; et al. Guidelines to design organic electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries: environmental impact, physicochemical and electrochemical properties. Green. Chem. 2017, 19, 1828-49.
82. Hu, Y.; Yang, X.; Lv, Y.; et al. Identification of potential electrolyte additives via density functional theory analysis. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202300098.
83. Fan, X.; Wang, C. High-voltage liquid electrolytes for Li batteries: progress and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 10486-566.
84. Gao, P.; Andersen, A.; Sepulveda, J.; et al. SOMAS: a platform for data-driven material discovery in redox flow battery development. Sci. Data. 2022, 9, 740.
85. Spotte-Smith, E. W. C.; Blau, S. M.; Xie, X.; et al. Quantum chemical calculations of lithium-ion battery electrolyte and interphase species. Sci. Data. 2021, 8, 203.
86. Cheng, L.; Assary, R. S.; Qu, X.; et al. Accelerating electrolyte discovery for energy storage with high-throughput screening. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 283-91.
87. Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-52.
88. Krishnan, R.; Binkley, J. S.; Seeger, R.; Pople, J. A. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 650-4.
89. Perdew, J. P. Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. B. Condens. Matter. 1986, 33, 8822-4.
90. Grimme, S.; Ehrlich, S.; Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011, 32, 1456-65.
