REFERENCES
1. Davies MJ, Thomas A. Thrombosis and acute coronary-artery lesions in sudden cardiac ischemic death. N Engl J Med 1984;310:1137-40.
2. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, et al. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the committee on vascular lesions of the council on arteriosclerosis. Circulation 1995;92:1355-74.
3. Mahmoud AN, Shah NH, Elgendy IY, et al. Safety and efficacy of second-generation drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents: an updated meta-analysis and regression of 9 randomized clinical trials. Clin Cardiol 2018;4:151-58.
4. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 2018;39:213-60.
5. Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, et al. Stent-related adverse events > 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:590-604.
6. Otsuka F, Byrne RA, Yahagi K, et al. Neoatherosclerosis: overview of histopathologic findings and implications for intravascular imaging assessment. Eur Heart J 2015;36:2147-59.
7. Shlofmitz E, Iantorno, M, Waksman R. Restenosis of drug-eluting stents: a new classification system based on disease mechanism to guide treatment and state-of-the-art review. Cir Cardiovasc Interv 2019;12:e007023.
8. Onuma Y, Serruys PW. Bioresorbable scaffold: the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary and peripheral revascularization? Circulation 2011;123:779-97.
9. OnumaY, Serruys PW, Perkins LE, et al. Intracoronary optical coherence tomography and histology at 1 month and 2, 3, and 4 years after implantation of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in a porcine coronary artery model: an attempt to decipher the human optical coherence tomography images in the ABSORB trial. Circulation 2010;122:2288-300.
10. Vahl TP, Gasior P, Gongora CA, et al. Four-year polymer biocompatibility and vascular healing profile of a novel ultrahigh molecular weight amorphous PLLA bioresorbable vascular scaffold: an OCT study in healthy porcine coronary arteries. EuroIntervention 2016;12:1510-18.
11. Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, et al. Three-year outcomes with the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: individual-patient-data meta-analysis from the ABSORB randomized trials. Circulation 2018;137:464-79.
12. Cassese S, Byrne RA, Jüni P, et al. Midterm clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. EuroIntervention 2018;13:1565-73.
13. Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger C, et al. ABSORB III Investigators. 3-Year clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffolds: the ABSORB III trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2852-62.
14. Fujii K, Carlier SG, Mintz GS, et al. Stent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:995-98.
15. Okabe T, Mintz GS, Buch AN, et al. Intravascular ultrasound parameters associated with stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent deployment. Am J Cardiol 2007;100:615-20.
16. Cuculi F, Puricel S, Jamshidi P, et al. Optical Coherence tomography findings in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds thrombosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2015;8:1-9.
17. Capodanno D, Gori T, Nef H, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European Multicentre GHOST-EU registry. EuroIntervention 2014;10:1144-53.
18. Finn AV, Joner M, Nakazawa GK. Pathological correlates of late drug-eluting stent throm- bosis: strut coverage as a marker of endothelialization. Circulation 2007;115:2435-41.
19. Awata M, Kotani J, Uematsu M. Serial angioscopic evidence of incomplete neointimal coverage after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: comparison with bare-metal stents. Circulation 2007;116:910-16.
20. Nebeker JR, Virmani R, Bennett CL, et al. Hypersensitivity cases associated with drug-eluting coronary stents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:175-81.
21. Otsuka F, Pacheco E, Perkins LE. Long-term safety of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold and the cobalt-chromium XIENCE V stent in a porcine coronary artery model. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:330-42.
22. Tellez A, Afari ME, Buszman PP, et al. Peri-strut low-intensity areas in optical coherence tomography correlate with peri-strut inflammation and neointimal proliferation: an in-vivo cor- relation study in the familial hypercholesterolemic coronary swine model of in-stent restenosis. Coron Artery Dis 2014;25:595-601.
23. Otsuka F, Nakano M, Ladich E, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Pathologic etiologies of late and very late stent thrombosis following first-generation drug-eluting stent placement. Thrombosis ;2012:608-16.
24. Kerkmeijer LSM, Renkens MPL, Tijssen RYG, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents: final 5-year results of the AIDA randomized clinical trial. EuroIntervention 2022;17:1340-7.
25. Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet 2016;388:2479-91.
26. Puricel S, Arroyo D, Gendre G, et al. Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: 2-year out- comes of the EVERBIO II trial. Int J Cardiol 2017;243:121-25.
27. Gao R, Yang Y, Han Y, et al. ABSORB China Investigators. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus metallic stents in patients with coronary artery disease: ABSORB China trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:21:2298-309.
28. Onuma Y, Sotomi Y, Shiomi H, et al. Two-year clinical, angiographic, and serial optical coherence tomographic follow-up after implantation of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and an everolimus-eluting metallic stent: insights from the randomised ABSORB Japan trial. EuroIntervention 2016;12:1090-101.
29. Mahmoud AN, Barakat AF, Elgendy AY, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:e005286.
30. Stone GW, Abizaid A, Onuma Y, et al. Effect of technique on outcomes following bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation: analysis from the ABSORB trials. J Am Coll Cardiol ;2017 70:2863-74.
31. Räber L, Brugaletta S, Yamaji K, et al. Very late scaffold thrombosis: intracoronary imaging and histopathological and spectroscopic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1901-14.
32. Witzenbichler B, Maehara A, Weisz G, et al. Relationship between intravascular ultrasound guidance and clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stents: the ADAPT-DES study. Circulation 2014;129:463-70.
33. Wang L, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B, et al. Differences in underlying culprit lesion morphology between men and women: an IVUS analysis from the ADAPT-DES study. Cardiovasc Imaging 2015;S:1936-44.
34. Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM, et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2020;13:13:62-71.
35. Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ, et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv ;2021 8:14:247-57.
36. Takarada S, Imanishi T, Liu Y, et al. Advantage of next-generation frequency-domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time- domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;75:202-6.
37. Prati F, Regar E, Mintz GS. Expert’s OCT Review Document. Expert review document on methodology, terminology, and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography: physical principles, methodology of image acquisition, and clinical application for assessment of coronary arteries and atherosclerosis. Eur Heart J 2010;31:401-15.
38. Prati F, Di Vito L, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide decision-making during percutaneous coro- nary intervention: the Centro per la Lotta contro l’Infarto-Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CLI-OPCI) study. EuroIntervention 2012;8:823-9.
39. Brown A, McCormick LM, Braganza DM, et al. Expansion and malapposition characteristics after bioresorbable vascular stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014;84:37-45.
40. Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, Mintz GS. Intravascular ultrasound-guidance is associated with lower cardiovascular mortality and myocardial infarction for drug-eluting stent implantation- insights from an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials. Circ J 2019;83:1410-13.
41. Leesar MA, Saif I, Hagood KL, et al. A new method to optimize stent deployment by high-definition intravascular ultrasound. J Invasive Cardiol 2021;33:E532-E539.
42. Ali ZA, Maehara A, Generous P, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III). Lancet 2016;388:2618-28.
43. Costantini CR, Denk MA, De Macedo RM. Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold outcomes following implantation with routine intravascular imaging guidance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;97:48-55.
44. Sakamoto A, Jinnouchi H, Torii S, Virmani R, Finn AV. Understanding the impact of stent and scaffold material and strut design on coronary artery throm- bosis from the basic and clinical points of view. Bio-engineering 2019;10:175-89.
45. Gijsen F, Katagiri Y, Barlis P, et al. Expert recom- mendations on the assessment of wall shear stress in human coronary arteries: existing methodologies, technical considerations, and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2019;40:3421-33.
46. Bangalore S, Toklu B, Patel N, Feit F, Stone GW. Newer-generation ultrathin strut drug-eluting stents versus older second-generation thicker strut drug- eluting stents for coronary artery disease. Circulation 2018;138:2216-26.
47. Verheye S, Wlodarczak A, Montorsi P, et al. BIOSOLVE-IV-registry: safety and performance of the Magmaris scaffold: 12-month outcomes of the first cohort of 1,075 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2021;98:E1-E8.
48. Guti ́errez-Chico JL, Serruys PW, Girasis C, et al. Quantitative multi-modality imaging analysis of a fully bioresorbable stent: a head-to-head comparison between QCA, IVUS and OCT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;28:469-78.
49. Bangalore S, Bezerra HG, Rizik DG, et al. The state of the absorb bioresorbable scaffold: consensus from an expert panel. J Am Coll Cardiolo Interv 2017;10:2349-59.
