REFERENCES
1. Casas-Cabanas, M.; Palacín, M. R. Challenges ahead in the development of solid-state batteries. J. Power. Sources. 2025, 659, 238355.
2. Koech, A. K.; Mwandila, G.; Mulolani, F.; Mwaanga, P. Lithium-ion battery fundamentals and exploration of cathode materials: a review. S. Afr. J. Chem. Eng. 2024, 50, 321-39.
3. Zhang, Z.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; et al. Review on composite solid electrolytes for solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Mater. Today. Sustainability. 2023, 21, 100316.
4. Balaish, M.; Gonzalez-Rosillo, J. C.; Kim, K. J.; Zhu, Y.; Hood, Z. D.; Rupp, J. L. M. Processing thin but robust electrolytes for solid-state batteries. Nat. Energy. 2021, 6, 227-39.
5. Hayashi, A.; Sakuda, A.; Tatsumisago, M. Development of sulfide solid electrolytes and interface formation processes for bulk-type all-solid-state Li and Na batteries. Front. Energy. Res. 2016, 4.
6. Furukawa, H.; Cordova, K. E.; O’keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O. M. The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 2013, 341, 1230444.
7. Horike, S.; Umeyama, D.; Kitagawa, S. Ion conductivity and transport by porous coordination polymers and metal-organic frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 2376-84.
8. Kharod, R. A.; Andrews, J. L.; Dincă, M. Teaching metal-organic frameworks to conduct: ion and electron transport in metal-organic frameworks. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2022, 52, 103-28.
9. Phang, W. J.; Jo, H.; Lee, W. R.; et al. Superprotonic conductivity of a UiO-66 framework functionalized with sulfonic acid groups by facile postsynthetic oxidation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2015, 54, 5142-6.
10. Dong, P.; Zhang, X.; Hiscox, W.; et al. Toward high-performance metal-organic-framework-based quasi-solid-state electrolytes: tunable structures and electrochemical properties. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2211841.
11. Shen, L.; Wu, H. B.; Liu, F.; et al. Creating lithium-ion electrolytes with biomimetic ionic channels in metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, e1707476.
12. Pallach, R.; Keupp, J.; Terlinden, K.; et al. Frustrated flexibility in metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4097.
13. Deriche, Z.; Biswal, S. L.; Kampouri, S. Navigating ionic conductivity in MOF electrolytes: addressing measurement pitfalls and performance limits. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2025, 13, 33012-33.
14. Zhang, J. P.; Zhou, H. L.; Zhou, D. D.; Liao, P. Q.; Chen, X. M. Controlling flexibility of metal-organic frameworks. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2018, 5, 907-19.
15. Ji, Z.; Wang, H.; Canossa, S.; Wuttke, S.; Yaghi, O. M. Pore chemistry of metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 2000238.
16. Taylor, J. M.; Dekura, S.; Ikeda, R.; Kitagawa, H. Defect control to enhance proton conductivity in a metal-organic framework. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2286-9.
17. Basu, O.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Laha, S.; Das, S. K. Defect engineering in a metal-organic framework system to achieve super-protonic conductivity. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 6734-43.
18. Chen, Z.; Du, T.; Krishnan, N. M. A.; Yue, Y.; Smedskjaer, M. M. Disorder-induced enhancement of lithium-ion transport in solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 1057.
19. Li, X.; Jiang, G.; Jian, M.; et al. Construction of angstrom-scale ion channels with versatile pore configurations and sizes by metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 286.
20. Truong, E.; Patel, S. V.; Liu, H.; et al. Accelerating ion transport in polycrystalline conductors: on pores and grain boundaries. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadt7795.
21. Shi, Y.; Kimura, S.; Iwai, Y.; et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of anisotropic proton conduction in two-dimensional metal-organic frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2024, 63, 22194-202.
22. Ding, J.; Du, T.; Jensen, L. R.; et al. High-performance dendrite-free lithium metal anode based on metal-organic framework glass. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2400652.
23. Luo, Y.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Ke, X.; Xu, Y.; Shi, Z. Modification of separator by glassy metal-organic framework with isotropic and grain-boundary-free characteristics enables reversible lithium plating/stripping in lithium metal batteries. J. Alloys. Compd. 2026, 1056, 186540.
24. Sørensen, S. S.; Østergaard, M. B.; Stepniewska, M.; Johra, H.; Yue, Y.; Smedskjaer, M. M. Metal-organic framework glasses possess higher thermal conductivity than their crystalline counterparts. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020, 12, 18893-903.
25. Wang, X. X.; Guan, D. H.; Miao, C. L.; et al. Boundary-free metal-organic framework glasses enable highly stable all-solid-state lithium-oxygen battery. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2023, 14, 2303829.
26. Chai, M.; Chen, R.; Xu, K.; et al. Ion transport and conduction in metal-organic framework glasses. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 11, 20302-14.
27. Jiang, G.; Qu, C.; Xu, F.; et al. Glassy metal-organic-framework-based quasi-solid-state electrolyte for high-performance lithium-metal batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104300.
28. Chen, T.; Reddy, N. P.; Li, M. Enhancing solid-state Li-ion batteries with MOF-polymer composite electrolytes - effect mechanisms and interface engineering. Gels 2025, 11, 946.
29. Zhao, Y.; Wang, L.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Solid polymer electrolytes with high conductivity and transference number of Li ions for Li-based rechargeable batteries. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003675.
30. Jiang, P.; Du, G.; Cao, J.; et al. Solid-state Li ion batteries with oxide solid electrolytes: progress and perspective. Energy. Tech. 2023, 11, 2201288.
31. Bennett, T. D.; Yue, Y.; Li, P.; et al. Melt-quenched glasses of metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 3484-92.
32. Umeyama, D.; Horike, S.; Inukai, M.; Itakura, T.; Kitagawa, S. Reversible solid-to-liquid phase transition of coordination polymer crystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 864-70.
33. Méndez, E.; Semino, R. Microscopic mechanism of thermal amorphization of ZIF-4 and melting of ZIF-zni revealed via molecular dynamics and machine learning techniques. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2024, 12, 4572-82.
35. Bennett, T. D.; Tan, J. C.; Yue, Y.; et al. Hybrid glasses from strong and fragile metal-organic framework liquids. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8079.
36. Gaillac, R.; Pullumbi, P.; Coudert, F. X. Melting of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks with different topologies: insight from first-principles molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018, 122, 6730-6.
37. Qiao, A.; Bennett, T. D.; Tao, H.; et al. A metal-organic framework with ultrahigh glass-forming ability. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaao6827.
38. Zhou, H. G.; Xia, R. Q.; Zheng, J.; Yuan, D.; Ning, G. H.; Li, D. Acid-triggered interlayer sliding of two-dimensional copper(i)-organic frameworks: more metal sites for catalysis. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 6280-6.
39. Ogawa, T.; Takahashi, K.; Nagarkar, S. S.; et al. Coordination polymer glass from a protic ionic liquid: proton conductivity and mechanical properties as an electrolyte. Chem. Sci. 2020, 11, 5175-81.
40. Jin, X.; Wu, X.; Ng, D.; et al. Liquid metal interface enables glassy MOF membranes with defect-mediated CO2 transport. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 9510.
41. Smirnova, O.; Duval, A.; Komal, A.; et al. Unlocking large-area free-standing MOF-glasses for molecular sieving gas separation membranes. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 2575.
42. Du, T.; Li, S.; Ganisetti, S.; Bauchy, M.; Yue, Y.; Smedskjaer, M. M. Deciphering the controlling factors for phase transitions in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2024, 11, nwae023.
43. Kelly, T.; Ghadi, B. M.; Berg, S.; Ardebili, H. In situ study of strain-dependent ion conductivity of stretchable polyethylene oxide electrolyte. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20128.
44. Ogawa, T.; Takahashi, K.; Kurihara, T.; et al. Network size control in coordination polymer glasses and its impact on viscosity and H+ conductivity. Chem. Mater. 2022, 34, 5832-41.
45. Frentzel-Beyme, L.; Kolodzeiski, P.; Weiß, J. B.; Schneemann, A.; Henke, S. Quantification of gas-accessible microporosity in metal-organic framework glasses. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7750.
46. Thornton, A. W.; Jelfs, K. E.; Konstas, K.; et al. Porosity in metal-organic framework glasses. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 3750-3.
47. Wang, Y.; Jin, H.; Ma, Q.; et al. A MOF glass membrane for gas separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2020, 59, 4365-9.
48. Bennett, T. D.; Cao, S.; Tan, J. C.; et al. Facile mechanosynthesis of amorphous zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14546-9.
49. Zhou, C.; Longley, L.; Krajnc, A.; et al. Metal-organic framework glasses with permanent accessible porosity. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5042.
50. Xue, W. L.; Kolodzeiski, P.; Aucharova, H.; et al. Highly porous metal-organic framework liquids and glasses via a solvent-assisted linker exchange strategy of ZIF-8. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4420.
51. Lin, Y. Y.; Yong, A. X. B.; Gustafson, W. J.; et al. Toward design of cation transport in solid-state battery electrolytes: Structure-dynamics relationships. Curr. Opin. Solid. State. Mater. Sci. 2020, 24, 100875.
52. Wang, Y.; Jiang, G.; Li, J.; et al. Glassy metal-organic framework-based solid-state electrolytes: advance, challenge, and emerging opportunities. Small. Methods. 2025, 9, e01131.
53. Kong, O.; Jiang, G.; Wang, K.; et al. Elucidation of Li+ conduction behavior in MOF glass electrolyte toward long-cycling and high C-rate lithium metal batteries. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2025, 15, 2405593.
54. Kolodzeiski, P.; Gallant, B. M.; Richter, L.; et al. Alkali-ion-modified zeolitic imidazolate framework glasses. Nature. Chem. 2026, 18, 1383-92.
55. Ridley, P.; Nguyen, L. H. B.; Sebti, E.; et al. Amorphous and nanocrystalline halide solid electrolytes with enhanced sodium-ion conductivity. Matter 2024, 7, 485-99.
56. Binci, L.; Jun, K.; Deng, B.; Ceder, G. Mechanisms of alkali ionic transport in amorphous oxyhalides solid state conductors. arXiv 2026, arXiv:2601.06384. Available online: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.06384 (accessed 10 September 2026).
57. Nozari, V.; Calahoo, C.; Tuffnell, J. M.; et al. Sodium ion conductivity in superionic IL-impregnated metal-organic frameworks: enhancing stability through structural disorder. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3532.
58. Zhang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, H.; Gao, Y. Copper-doped metal-organic framework-74 solid-state electrolytes for high performance all-solid-state sodium metal batteries. J. Colloid. Interface. Sci. 2025, 689, 137241.
59. Mirandona-Olaeta, A.; Goikolea, E.; Lanceros-Mendez, S.; Fidalgo-Marijuan, A.; Ruiz de Larramendi, I. Ionic liquid-laden Zn-MOF-74-based solid-state electrolyte for sodium batteries. Batteries 2023, 9, 588.
60. Li, Z.; Gao, Y.; Wang, W.; et al. In situ bridging soft polymer and robust metal-organic frameworks as electrolyte for long-cycling solid-state potassium-organic batteries. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2024, 72, 103732.
61. Gu, Y. J.; Lo, Y. A.; Li, A. C.; et al. A single potassium-ion conducting metal-organic framework. ACS. Appl. Energy. Mater. 2022, 5, 8573-80.
62. Shannon, R. D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta. Cryst. 1976, 32, 751-67.
63. Dhir, S.; Jagger, B.; Maguire, A.; Pasta, M. Fundamental investigations on the ionic transport and thermodynamic properties of non-aqueous potassium-ion electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3833.
64. Bennett, T. D.; Horike, S. Liquid, glass and amorphous solid states of coordination polymers and metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3, 431-40.
65. Xia, X.; Zhang, Z. Q.; Wen, Q.; et al. Metal-organic-framework-based solid-state electrolytes for high-performance lithium metal batteries: recent advances and prospects. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2026, 37, 111653.
66. Kim, M.; Lee, H. S.; Seo, D. H.; Jeon, E. C.; Moon, H. R. Melt-quenched carboxylate metal-organic framework glasses. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1174.
67. Díez, N.; Fuertes, A. B.; Sevilla, M. Molten salt strategies towards carbon materials for energy storage and conversion. Energy. Storage. Mater. 2021, 38, 50-69.
68. Cao, F.; Sørensen, S. S.; Christensen, A. K. R.; et al. Continuous structure modification of metal-organic framework glasses via halide salts. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 7001.
69. Cao, F.; Sørensen, S. S.; Christensen, A. K. R.; et al. Tailoring the melting and glass transition behavior of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks via ammonium halide salts. Small 2026, 22, e73675.
70. Jiang, S.; Lv, T.; Peng, Y.; Pang, H. MOFs containing solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Adv. Sci. 2023, 10, e2206887.
71. Lim, D. W.; Kitagawa, H. Proton transport in metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8416-67.
72. Chen, J.; Mei, Q.; Chen, Y.; et al. Highly efficient proton conduction in the metal-organic framework material MFM-300(Cr)·SO4(H3O)2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 11969-74.
73. Ye, Y.; Guo, W.; Wang, L.; et al. Straightforward loading of imidazole molecules into metal-organic framework for high proton conduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15604-7.
74. Ramaswamy, P.; Wong, N. E.; Shimizu, G. K. H. MOFs as proton conductors - challenges and opportunities. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5913-32.
75. Lim, D. W.; Kitagawa, H. Rational strategies for proton-conductive metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 6349-68.
76. Meng, X.; Wang, H. N.; Song, S. Y.; Zhang, H. J. Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 464-80.
77. Urgoiti-Rodriguez, M.; Vaquero-Vílchez, S.; Mirandona-Olaeta, A.; et al. Exploring ionic liquid-laden metal-organic framework composite materials as hybrid electrolytes in metal (ion) batteries. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 995063.
78. Yoshida, Y.; Kitagawa, H. Ionic conduction in metal-organic frameworks with incorporated ionic liquids. ACS. Sustainable. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 70-81.
79. Xiang, Y.; Yu, N.; Li, J.; et al. Carving metal-organic-framework glass based solid-state electrolyte via a top-down strategy for lithium-metal battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2025, 64, e202424288.
80. Yoshida, Y.; Fujie, K.; Lim, D. W.; Ikeda, R.; Kitagawa, H. Superionic conduction over a wide temperature range in a metal-organic framework impregnated with ionic liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2019, 58, 10909-13.
81. Ding, J.; Du, T.; Thomsen, E. H.; et al. Metal-organic framework glass as a functional filler enables enhanced performance of solid-state polymer electrolytes for lithium metal batteries. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2306698.
82. Liu, S.; Jiang, G.; Wang, Y.; et al. Vitrified metal-organic framework composite electrolyte enabling dendrite-free and long-lifespan solid-state lithium metal batteries. ACS. Nano. 2024, 18, 14907-16.
83. Wang, C.; Zhang, J.; Shi, P.; Zhou, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, Y. Metal organic framework MOF-808-based solid-state electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries. New. J. Chem. 2023, 47, 14114-7.
84. Wang, K.; Yang, L.; Wang, Z.; et al. Enhanced lithium dendrite suppressing capability enabled by a solid-like electrolyte with different-sized nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13060-3.
85. Wang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Yang, L.; et al. Boosting interfacial Li+ transport with a MOF-based ionic conductor for solid-state batteries. Nano. Energy. 2018, 49, 580-7.
86. Wang, Z.; Tan, R.; Wang, H.; et al. A metal-organic-framework-based electrolyte with nanowetted interfaces for high-energy-density solid-state lithium battery. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704436.
87. Wu, J. F.; Guo, X. Nanostructured metal-organic framework (MOF)-derived solid electrolytes realizing fast lithium ion transportation kinetics in solid-state batteries. Small 2019, 15, e1804413.
88. Abdelmaoula, A. E.; Shu, J.; Cheng, Y.; et al. Core-shell MOF-in-MOF nanopore bifunctional host of electrolyte for high-performance solid-state lithium batteries. Small. Methods. 2021, 5, e2100508.
89. Zettl, R.; Hanzu, I. The origins of ion conductivity in MOF-ionic liquids hybrid solid electrolytes. Front. Energy. Res. 2021, 9, 714698.
90. Yu, X.; Grundish, N. S.; Goodenough, J. B.; Manthiram, A. Ionic liquid (IL) laden metal-organic framework (IL-MOF) electrolyte for quasi-solid-state sodium batteries. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 24662-9.
91. Ferbezar, A.; Zettl, R.; Fitzek, H.; Gadermaier, B.; Hanzu, I. Ion conduction in Na+ containing ionogels based on the UiO-66 metal organic framework. Electrochim. Acta. 2022, 434, 141212.
92. Xue, W. L.; Li, G. Q.; Chen, H.; et al. Melt-quenched glass formation of a family of metal-carboxylate frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2040.
93. Tian, X.; Yi, Y.; Wu, Z.; et al. Ionic liquid confined in MOF/polymerized ionic network core-shell host as a solid electrolyte for lithium batteries. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 266, 118271.
94. He, C.; Sun, J.; Hou, C.; et al. Sandwich-structural ionogel electrolyte with core-shell ionic-conducting nanocomposites for stable Li metal battery. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 451, 138993.
95. Ma, N.; Kosasang, S.; Yoshida, A.; Horike, S. Proton-conductive coordination polymer glass for solid-state anhydrous proton batteries. Chem. Sci. 2021, 12, 5818-24.
96. Majid, M. F.; Mohd Zaid, H. F.; Kait, C. F.; Ahmad, A.; Jumbri, K. Ionic liquid@metal-organic framework as a solid electrolyte in a lithium-ion battery: current performance and perspective at molecular level. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1076.
97. Nozari, V.; Calahoo, C.; Tuffnell, J. M.; Keen, D. A.; Bennett, T. D.; Wondraczek, L. Ionic liquid facilitated melting of the metal-organic framework ZIF-8. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5703.
98. Longley, L.; Collins, S. M.; Li, S.; et al. Flux melting of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 3592-601.
99. Thorne, M. F.; Gómez, M. L. R.; Bumstead, A. M.; Li, S.; Bennett, T. D. Mechanochemical synthesis of mixed metal, mixed linker, glass-forming metal-organic frameworks. Green. Chem. 2020, 22, 2505-12.
100. Madsen, R. S. K.; Stepniewska, M.; Yang, Y.; et al. Mixed metal node effect in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. RSC. Adv. 2022, 12, 10815-24.
101. León-Alcaide, L.; Christensen, R. S.; Keen, D. A.; et al. Meltable, glass-forming, iron zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145, 11258-64.
102. Azbell, T. J.; Pitt, T. A.; Bollmeyer, M. M.; Cong, C.; Lancaster, K. M.; Milner, P. J. Ionothermal synthesis of metal-organic frameworks using low-melting metal salt precursors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023, 62, e202218252.
103. Bode, T.; Xue, W. L.; Garcia Alvarez, K. M.; et al. Defect identification in zeolitic imidazolate framework glasses by solid-state NMR spectroscopy using 13CO2 as probe. Chem. Mater. 2025, 37, 1578-87.
104. Shalini, S.; Vaid, T. P.; Matzger, A. J. Salt nanoconfinement in zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks leads to pore-size and loading-dependent ionic conductivity enhancement. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 7245-8.
105. Farina, M.; Duff, B. B.; Tealdi, C.; Pugliese, A.; Blanc, F.; Quartarone, E. Li+ dynamics of liquid electrolytes nanoconfined in metal-organic frameworks. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 13, 53986-95.
106. Butreddy, P.; Wijesingha, M.; Laws, S.; Pathiraja, G.; Mo, Y.; Rathnayake, H. Insight into the isoreticularity of Li-MOFs for the design of low-density solid and quasi-solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 2023, 35, 9857-78.
107. Longley, L.; Calahoo, C.; Limbach, R.; et al. Metal-organic framework and inorganic glass composites. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5800.
108. Chen, W.; Horike, S.; Umeyama, D.; et al. Glass formation of a coordination polymer crystal for enhanced proton conductivity and material flexibility. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 5195-200.
109. Bischoff, C.; Schuller, K.; Beckman, S. P.; Martin, S. W. Non-arrhenius ionic conductivities in glasses due to a distribution of activation energies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 075901.
110. Murugavel, S.; Vaid, C.; Bhadram, V. S.; Narayana, C. Ion transport mechanism in glasses: non-arrhenius conductivity and nonuniversal features. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010, 114, 13381-5.
111. Riess, I. Four point Hebb-Wagner polarization method for determining the electronic conductivity in mixed ionic-electronic conductors. Solid. State. Ionics. 1992, 51, 219-29.
112. Lee, K. R.; Lee, J. H.; Yoo, H. I. Reassessment of conventional polarization technique to measure partial electronic conductivity of electrolytes. Solid. State. Ionics. 2010, 181, 724-9.
113. Shao, B.; Huang, Y.; Han, F. Electronic conductivity of lithium solid electrolytes. Adv. Energy. Mater. 2023, 13, 2204098.
114. Hou, T.; Xu, W.; Pei, X.; Jiang, L.; Yaghi, O. M.; Persson, K. A. Ionic conduction mechanism and design of metal-organic framework based quasi-solid-state electrolytes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 13446-50.
115. Rehr, J. J.; Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to x-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2000, 72, 621-54.
116. Chantler, C. T.; Bunker, G.; D’Angelo, P.; Diaz-Moreno, S. X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Nat. Rev. Methods. Primers. 2024, 4, 89.
117. Laulainen, J. E. M.; Johnstone, D. N.; Bogachev, I.; et al. Mapping short-range order at the nanoscale in metal-organic framework and inorganic glass composites. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 16524-35.
118. Keen, D. A. Total scattering and the pair distribution function in crystallography. Crystallogr. Rev. 2020, 26, 143-201.
119. Billinge, S. J. L. The rise of the X-ray atomic pair distribution function method: a series of fortunate events. Philos. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2019, 377, 20180413.
120. Peterson, P. F.; Olds, D.; Mcdonnell, M. T.; Page, K. Illustrated formalisms for total scattering data: a guide for new practitioners. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2021, 54, 317-32.
121. Molina, M. A.; Manjón-Sanz, A.; Sánchez-Sánchez, M. On the contribution of Pair Distribution Function (PDF) to the characterization of nanocrystalline MOFs: the case of M-MOF-74. Microporous. Mesoporous. Mater. 2021, 319, 110973.
122. Hou, J.; Chen, P.; Shukla, A.; et al. Liquid-phase sintering of lead halide perovskites and metal-organic framework glasses. Science 2021, 374, 621-5.
123. Lin, R.; Li, X.; Krajnc, A.; et al. Mechanochemically synthesised flexible electrodes based on bimetallic metal-organic framework glasses for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202112880.
124. Zhao, Z.; Ding, L.; Mundstock, A.; et al. Preparation of ZIF-62 polycrystalline and glass membranes for helium separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2024, 700, 122677.
125. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Li, Z.; et al. Scalable glass composite membranes for highly selective lithium enrichment. Nat. Water. 2026, 4, 643-55.
126. Wang, J.; Panchal, A. A.; Sai Gautam, G.; Canepa, P. The resistive nature of decomposing interfaces of solid electrolytes with alkali metal electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2022, 10, 19732-42.
127. Zhu, Y.; He, X.; Mo, Y. Origin of outstanding stability in the lithium solid electrolyte materials: insights from thermodynamic analyses based on first-principles calculations. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015, 7, 23685-93.
