Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B is enriched in CD9-positive extracellular vesicles released by osteoclasts
0Abstract
Aim: Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK)-containing extracellular vesicles (EVs) bind RANK-Ligand (RANKL) on osteoblasts, and thereby simultaneously inhibit bone resorption and promote bone formation. Because of this, they are attractive candidates for therapeutic bone anabolic agents. Previously, RANK was detected in 1 in every 36 EVs from osteoclasts by immunogold electron microscopy. Here, we have sought to characterize the subpopulation of EVs from osteoclasts that contains RANK in more detail.
Methods: The tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 were localized in osteoclasts by immunofluorescence. EVs were visualized by transmission electron microscopy. A Single Particle Interferometric Reflectance Imaging Sensor (SP-IRIS) and immunoaffinity isolations examined whether RANK is enriched in specific types of EVs.
Results: Immunofluorescence showed CD9 was mostly on or near the plasma membrane of osteoclasts. In contrast, CD81 was localized deeper in the osteoclast’s cytosolic vesicular network. By interferometry, both CD9 and CD81 positive EVs from osteoclasts were small (56-83 nm in diameter), consistent with electron microscopy. The CD9 and CD81 EV populations were mostly distinct, and only 22% of the EVs contained both markers. RANK was detected by SP-IRIS in 2%-4% of the CD9-containing EVs, but not in CD81-positive EVs, from mature osteoclasts. Immunomagnetic isolation of CD9-containing EVs from conditioned media of osteoclasts removed most of the RANK. A trace amount of RANK was isolated with CD81.
Conclusion: RANK was enriched in a subset of the CD9-positive EVs. The current study provides the first report of selective localization of RANK in subsets of EVs.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B-ligand (RANKL), on osteoblasts or osteocytes, binds its receptor RANK on osteoclast precursors and osteoclasts, and this is required for osteoclast formation, osteoclast survival, and bone resorption[1,2]. Bone diseases, in particular osteoporosis and metastatic bone cancer, are major clinical problems that are associated with excess and/or improperly localized bone resorption by osteoclasts. Amgen developed a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against RANKL (denosumab), which blocks its interaction with RANK, which has become a major therapeutic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis (Prolia) and bone cancer (Xgeva)[3-5].
Recently, in vitro evidence suggested that EVs-containing RANKL and EVs-containing RANK (RANK-EVs) are involved in bone remodeling[6-10]. Osteoblasts produce EVs containing RANKL that can stimulate osteoclast formation[6,11]. Osteoclasts produce RANK-EVs that can block RANKL binding to RANK to inhibit bone resorption[8]. In addition, when RANK-EVs bind RANKL on cells of the osteoblastic lineage, they stimulate them to differentiate towards bone formation through a RANKL-reverse signaling pathway[12]. Consistent with in vitro studies, it was demonstrated that RANKL-EVs stimulate osteoclasts
Only a small percentage of EVs released by osteoclasts contain RANK[8]. However, because of the high binding affinity between RANKL and RANK[15], a small number of RANK-containing EVs could have important regulatory effects. It was recently directly confirmed that RANK in EVs binds RANKL with an affinity of from 1-10 × 10-9 M[16]. In principle, agents that could stimulate osteoclasts to release higher numbers of RANK-EVs during their normal life cycle should reduce bone resorption and stimulate bone formation in the same way as the addition of exogenous RANK-EVs or RANK-EV mimetics. Indeed, such a mechanism might avoid possible off-target effects by localizing the increased RANK-EV levels to the bone microenvironment being remodeled. Because the RANKL/RANK signaling network also plays an important role in communication between immune cells[17,18], off-target effects are a real concern if RANK-EV levels are increased systemically. Unfortunately, nothing is known about the subset of EVs from osteoclasts that contain RANK, so there is no basis for rational strategies to stimulate RANK-EV production. In this study, we have made use of a Single Particle Interferometric Reflectance Imaging Sensor (SP-IRIS)[19,20] and immunoaffinity isolations to analyze RANK-EVs in greater detail. We hypothesized that RANK would be localized to a specific subset of EVs that also contains particular marker proteins, and that this would reflect the protein trafficking pathway through which RANK is incorporated into EVs. By SP-IRIS and immunoaffinity isolation, we have tested this idea.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Reagents and antibodies
Minimum essential media, α modification (αMEM) and Dulbecco’s minimum essential media (dMEM) were procured from Sigma/Aldrich Chemical CO (St. Louis, MO). The Anti-RANK antibody
Cell culture
Primary osteoclasts were from the marrow of the long bone of the hind legs obtained as described[8]. Mice (C57BL/6, Charles River) were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The femora and tibia were removed, and marrow was flushed with α-MEM complete media (Sigma-Aldrich) plus 10% exosome-free fetal bovine serum (Systems Biosciences, EXO-FBSHI-250A-1) supplemented with 1% L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin/am using a syringe with a 25-gauge needle. Cells were cultured in 100-cm dishes. They were seeded at a concentration of 1.5 × 106 cells/mL. Media was supplemented with 5 ng/mL recombinant murine Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor [CSF-1] (Peprotech, ThermoFisher Cat # AF-315-02-10UG). Cells were allowed to grow for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% carbon dioxide. Nonadherent cells were removed, and 5.9 × 105 cells/mL of adherent cells were placed in 24-well plates or at 2.1 × 106 on
4T1 murine breast cancer cells (kind gift of Gary Sahagian, Tufts University, Boston, MA) were grown in
Microscopy
Primary osteoclasts, osteoclast precursors, or 4T1 cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 20 min and permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Cells were grown in 24-well plates with Osteoclasts and pre-osteoclasts were then stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity using Leukocyte acid phosphatase kit (Sigma-Aldrich catalog #386A). 4T1 cells were stained with Phalloidin-Tetramethylrhodamine B isothiocyanate (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat # P1951, 10 ng/mL) to detect microfilaments. Images were taken using a Nikon Diaphot phase contrast microscope (ELWD 0.3).
Primary osteoclasts were stained for CD9 and CD81. They were fixed in 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 20 min, washed with PBS two times for 10 min each, and blocked in blocking buffer [PBS with a pH of 7.4 plus 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA)] for 60 min. The cells were then probed with 200 μL of the mouse anti-CD9 (MM2/57, diluted 1:500), or anti-CD81 (SN206-01, diluted 1:500) at 4 °C overnight. Dilutions were done in blocking buffer. Then, the cells were washed two times in PBS for 10 min each, and secondary antibodies rhodamine-conjugated to mouse IgG (T7782, diluted 1:500) or fluorescein-conjugated anti-rabbit (F4890, 1:500) were incubated for 60 min at room temperature in the dark. The cells were rinsed two times in PBS for 10 min each, and fluorescence was detected by Nikon epifluorescence microscopy. ImageJ and/or Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator were used to prepare Figures.
EV isolation
EVs were isolated under sterile conditions as described previously[23] using ExoQuick TC material from conditioned media following the manufacturer’s instructions. The final pellet, containing EVs and ExoQuick, was diluted fivefold with PBS to solubilize the ExoQuick material. The samples were then spun at 200,000 × g for 2 h in an Airfuge (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and the pellets were collected.
Transmission electron microscopy
EVs were prepared for electron microscopy as described previously[8]. EVs were isolated and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde. The fixed EVs were placed on Parafilm, and Formvar-carbon-coated electron microscope (EM) grids were floated on the EVs for 20 min. Grids were washed in PBS, transferred to 1% glutaraldehyde for 5 min, and then washed 8 times in deionized water. EVs were then placed atop a drop of uranyl-oxalate solution, which was transferred to methyl cellulose-uranyl acetate on ice for 12 min. The grids were blotted dry with filter paper, and observed under a Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan) 7600 transmission electron microscope operated at 80 kV.
Immunoblots
Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 4%-20% gels using the Mini-Protean system (BioRad). Gels were transferred to Immobilon membranes
SP-IRIS
We used the ExoView R-100 (Nanoview Technologies) as our SP-IRIS to analyze EVs released by osteoclasts. ExoView analysis was performed utilizing a specific chip (Cat # EV-TETRA-C, Nanoview Technologies). This method combines single particle interferometric reflectance imaging sensing with antibody-based microchip capture and fluorescence detection to measure EV size and concentration, the presence of EV tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 and RANK, and their colocalization profile. Preliminary experiments established the appropriate dilutions for detection of EVs from conditioned media of osteoclast pre-osteoclasts and 4T1 cells. 35 μL of diluted cell supernatants were placed on microchip with separate wells pre-coated with the capture antibodies CD81 (clone Eat-2, mouse, Biolegend), CD9 (clone MZ3, mouse, Biolegend), and negative controls HIgG (clone HTK888, mouse, Biolegend) and RIgG (clone RTK2758, Biolegend). The microchips were incubated overnight, followed by three washing steps, blocking and incubation with a cocktail of fluorescent antibodies against RANK, CD81 and CD9, allowing for colocalization analysis of the three membrane proteins on single EVs. Probe antibodies were Alexa Fluor@488-conjugated CD9 (MM2/57), Alexa Fluor@555-conjugated CD81 (SN206-01), Alexa Fluor@647-conjugated RANK (R12-31). This was followed by two additional washes. The ExoView R100 reader and nScan 2.8.19 acquisition software (NanoView) were used for imaging microchips and data acquisition. The ExoView Analyzer 3.2 with thresholds set to 50-200 nm was used to perform data analysis. All measurements were done in triplicate.
Immunomagnetic isolation
Anti-CD9 antibody MM2/57 or an anti-CD81 antibody SN206-01 were dialyzed into PBS and then coupled to Dynabeads M-270 Epoxy Beads (Cat # 65305, Thermo Fisher Scientific). All necessary reagents were provided in the Dynabeads Antibody Coupling Kit for magnetic bead isolation (Cat # 65305). The procedure was performed as described in the manual provided with the kit. Conditioned media dialyzed into 20 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors (F-buffer) were incubated for 2 h with 50-µL beads; the supernatants were collected; and the beads were washed thoroughly with F-buffer. Bead-bound material was eluted with 100 mM glycine sulfate (pH 2.3).
Statistics
Groups were first analyzed by ANOVA, then if significant, by Student’s t-test. Statistics were performed using SPSS version 17.0 (IBM).
RESULTS
Location of CD9 and CD81 in osteoclasts
To make use of the ExoView SP-IRIS, it is necessary to select antibodies that bind to abundant surface receptors on the EVs to be studied. From our previous quantitative proteomic analysis of EVs from osteoclasts, we identified the tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 to be abundant EV markers in osteoclasts EVs[24]. The most abundant of the “standard” EV markers in osteoclast EVs was syntenin-1[24,25]; however, an appropriate capture antibody for SP-IRIS is not available. CD9 and CD81 were attractive because they have roles in osteoclast differentiation and function[26-28].
We performed an immunofluorescent analysis of these proteins in osteoclasts and found that CD9 and CD81 were mostly localized in different cellular regions [Figure 1]. The difference was most dramatic in early unfused osteoclasts, where CD9 was distinctly associated with the plasma membrane while CD81 was mostly in the cytosol. In osteoclasts, the labeling patterns of both CD9 and CD81 were less distinct, but they mostly were not co-localized. Higher magnification shows that the two are very well separated in unfused osteoclasts. These data suggested that CD9 and CD81 occupy different subcellular locations in cells of the osteoclast lineage and are candidates to emerge from different pathways of EV production.
Figure 1. CD9 and CD81 have different localization patterns in osteoclasts and their precursors. Upper panels. CD9 (red, left panels) is concentrated in the plasma membrane area of unfused osteoclasts (small arrows) and of mature osteoclasts (arrowhead). CD81 (green, right panel) stains internally in unfused osteoclasts (small arrows) and in osteoclasts and many areas of cytosolic staining do not overlap. Merged image shows some overlap (yellow), but subsets of CD9 and CD81 do not co-localize. Bottom panels show a blowup of a region containing unfused osteoclasts, showing the differential distribution of CD9 and CD81 in more detail. Arrow indicates CD9 stained plasma membrane. Arrowhead indicates CD81 stained cytosol. Scale bar = 20 µm in top panels and 2.5 µm in bottom panels.
Validation of EV producing cells
Osteoclasts or osteoclast precursors were grown in cell culture as described previously[23]. To ensure the quality of the cells from which the EVs were obtained, we fixed the cells and stained osteoclasts and osteoclast-precursors for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity, a marker for osteoclasts. Phalloidin was used to label the microfilament cytoskeleton of 4T1 cells [Figure 2, top panels]. Osteoclast cultures contained many giant TRAP-positive multinuclear cells, as well as smaller TRAP-positive multinuclear and mononuclear cells [Figure 2A]. Osteoclast precursors displayed no TRAP activity and were mononuclear [Figure 2B]. 4T1 murine breast cancer cells, in which RANK is not detected, were used as a negative control in these studies [Figure 2C].
Figure 2. Extracellular vesicles isolated from osteoclasts, osteoclast precursors and 4T1 cancer cells have similar sizes and morphology. Top panels, (A) low magnification view of osteoclasts stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity shows mostly multinuclear giant cells that stain pink indicating they are positive for TRAP; (B) Higher magnification view of osteoclast precursors, also stained for TRAP activity, shows no pink stain, only gold background staining; (C) Phalloidin-tagged with Texas Red demonstrates the 4T1 cancer cells; 4T1 cells do not contain TRAP. Scale bar in top panels is 200 µm for osteoclasts, and 10 µm for osteoclast precursors and 4T1 cells; Bottom panels show EVs isolated from (D) osteoclasts; (E) pre-osteoclasts and (F) 4T1 cells. Note that the EVs from the different cell types share similar size and morphology. Scale bars for bottom panels = 60 nm.
EVs were isolated from conditioned media from each type of culture [Figure 2D-F]. The EVs displayed a typical cup-like appearance. The sizes of EVs determined were osteoclasts (53 ± 12 nm n = 137), preosteoclasts (47 ± 13 nm, n = 64), and 4T1 cells (60 ± 16, n = 111). The sizes of the EVs from the different cells were not significantly different.
Data from SP-IRIS
To study RANK-EVs, EVs containing CD9 or CD81 were captured from conditioned media of osteoclasts, osteoclast precursors, or 4T1 cells on SP-IRIS chips carrying anti-CD9, and CD81, or control antibodies. The EVs were then detected, measured by interferometry, and labeled with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies that bind CD9, CD81, or RANK. The measured size of the captured EVs is shown in Figure 3A.
Figure 3. Characterization of CD9 and CD81 EVs by SP-IRIS. (A) Sizes measured by interferometry are in the range ascribed to small exosomes; (B) Heat map shows that RANK was only detected in CD9-captured EVs from osteoclast-precursors and osteoclasts. Samples were diluted 10X or 2X. Numbers are particle count × 103; (C) EVs captured by anti-CD9 antibody from 2X diluted sample and detected by interferometry (Total), anti-RANK antibody, anti-CD81 antibody, or anti-CD9 antibody. Note that not every EV captured by anti-CD9 antibody is expected to be detected by a second anti-CD9 antibody as antigen may be patched on the capture side of EVs; (D) Very few EVs were captured by CD9 control antibody; (E) EVs captured by Anti-CD81 from 2X diluted samples. CD81 EVs are more common in 4T1 cells than osteoclasts or their precursors, and regardless of cell source, RANK was not detected on EVs captured with an anti-CD81 antibody; (F) Very few EVs were captured by CD81 control antibody. The asterisks in panels C and E indicate significant differences from controls; the n = 3. The results indicate statistics performed first by ANOVA, then by t-tests, P < 0.05; *: P < 0.05.
RANK was only detected in EVs from osteoclasts attached to chips through CD9 [Figure 3B]. RANK was detected in 2%-4% of the EVs from osteoclasts captured by the CD9 antibody [Figure 3C]. It was not detected in EVs from pre-osteoclasts. Experimental controls for CD9 using an isotype-matched antibody displayed a very low background [Figure 3D]. RANK was not detected in EVs pulled down by the CD81 antibody [Figure 3E]. The isotype control for CD81 also displayed a very low background [Figure 3F]. As expected, RANK was not detected in EVs from 4T1 cells [Figure 3B, C, and E]. These data suggest RANK is enriched in EVs from osteoclasts that contain CD9.
CD9/CD81 immunomagnetic isolations
SP-IRIS detected RANK in CD9-positive EVs from pre-osteoclasts and osteoclasts, and not in CD81-positive EVs from osteoclasts. To confirm this result, we performed immunomagnetic bead pull downs from conditioned media of osteoclasts using either immunomagnetic beads linked to a CD9 antibody, a CD81 antibody, or control antibodies. RANK was detected in the CD9 pull down and the conditioned media was mostly cleared of RANK [Figure 4A].
Figure 4. Immunomagnetic bead isolation confirms that RANK is mostly in EVs containing CD9. Conditioned media from osteoclasts from two wells of a 6-well plate for each trial were centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 15 min to remove cells and large debris. The conditioned media was subjected to magnetic immunoaffinity isolation. The total conditioned media, the unbound material and bound material eluted with low pH were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted to Immobilon P, and probed with antibodies against RANK, CD9 or CD81 as indicated. (A) Affinity isolation with anti-CD9 shows most of RANK was isolated with CD9-containing EVs; (B) Control shows neither RANK nor CD9 was isolated with control antibody; (C) Little RANK was isolated in CD81 EVs; (D) Little binding of RANK or CD81 was detected using a control antibody for anti-CD81; (E) Blots (n = 3) of CD9 immunomagnetic isolations were quantitated by densitometry. Most RANK and CD9 were isolated with anti-CD9 immunomagnetic isolation; (F) Blots (n = 3) of CD81 immunomagnetic isolations were quantitated by densitometry. A small but significant amount of RANK was detected associated with CD81. Note that the anti-CD81 antibody worked much better for the detection of its target protein in Westerns than the anti-CD9 antibody. Asterisks indicate a difference from control value; P < 0.05 by t-test; *: P < 0.05.
In the anti-CD81 pull down, the majority of RANK was unbound, but some RANK eluted, with CD81. This is consistent with a small fraction of CD81 EVs also containing RANK, even though we could not detect this binding in the SP-IRIS assay [Figure 4B]. Little RANK or CD9 were eluted when a species-specific control antibody was used in place of the anti-CD9 antibody [Figure 4C]. As with the CD9 pull down, little RANK or CD81 were detected in the elution when the control antibody was used in place of the anti-CD81 antibody [Figure 4D]. Results are quantitated by densitometry of blots in Figure 4E (anti-CD9) and Figure 4F (anti-CD81).
DISCUSSION
For the first time, we show that RANK is selectively enriched in CD9-positive EVs released by osteoclasts. RANK was found by SP-IRIS in 2%-4% of the EVs from osteoclasts that contain CD9. RANK was not detected by SP-IRIS on CD81 carrying EVs. Immunomagnetic isolation using an anti-CD9 antibody pulled down most of both the CD9 and RANK from conditioned media of osteoclasts. A small amount of RANK was isolated with a CD81 antibody by immunomagnetic isolation. These results suggest that osteoclasts have a mechanism for enriching specific subsets of EVs with RANK. The results of this study are consistent with quantitative immunogold labeling in our previous study, which found that 1 in 36 total EVs contained RANK[8]. We showed the RANK-EVs could block forward RANKL to RANK signaling like osteoprotegerin[8]. Ikebuchi et al. later showed that RANK-EVs stimulated RANKL reverse signaling on osteoblasts[12].
RANK is a trimer in cells and RANK molecules would presumably incorporate into EVs as trimers. This idea was recently directly tested in a study that showed RANK in EVs from macrophages binds RANKL on membranes with an affinity (KD = 1-10 nanomolar) that is close to that displayed in cell-cell interactions mediated by RANK and RANKL[16]. Since RANK monomers will not bind RANKL[15], this shows that functional RANK trimers are incorporated into EVs, from macrophages. The results are consistent with previous functional assays by our group[8] and by others[12], which showed RANK binding to RANKL triggered changes in cellular differentiation and activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts. The data from immunogold labeling indicates that the EVs that carry RANK may contain several RANK molecules, most likely trimers, dispersed over the EV. Together with the high binding affinity of the RANK trimer with RANKL trimers, this would make RANK-EVs potent binders of RANKL. If the EVs contain multiple RANK trimers, it may account for the clustering of RANKL on osteoblasts proposed to be crucial for stimulating RANKL reverse signaling and bone formation[29]. Further studies will be required to confirm these ideas.
Previous studies have shown CD9 is incorporated into EVs either at the plasma membrane in microvesicles, or in exosomes formed near the plasma membrane in other cell types[30]. Localization of CD9 in osteoclasts, and in particular unfused osteoclasts, supports a similar situation. As has been reported previously[26], we found that CD9 is localized near the plasma membrane in unfused osteoclasts and osteoclasts. In contrast, CD81 was detected mostly in cytosolic vesicular compartments. Our results are consistent with RANK-EVs being associated with an EV packaging pathway associated with the plasma membrane, with one possibility being that these are microvesicles.
As osteoclasts form, the percentage of EVs that contain CD9 increases, as does the amount of CD9 in osteoclasts. This is consistent with the overall increase in the expression of CD9 during osteoclastogenesis reported previously[26]. Prior studies have also shown that increasing amounts of CD9 are associated with lipid raft domains when osteoclasts are stimulated with RANKL[26]. CD9 also plays an important role in the fusion of osteoclast precursors to form multinucleated, mature osteoclasts, and is abundant in active osteoclasts in vivo[26,27,31]. The increased packaging of RANK into CD9-EVs may reflect increased expression of both RANK[8] and CD9 as osteoclasts mature.
Is it possible that RANK is released in microvesicles shed from the plasma membrane surface? This would be consistent with a previous study examining the location of CD9-EV formation, which concluded that the EVs were formed at the plasma membrane or near the cell’s surface[30]. Inconsistent with this idea is the small size of the RANK-containing EVs. Microvesicles are often described as 100 nm in diameter or greater[32], while the RANK-containing EVs measured by electron microscopy were about 50 nm in diameter[8]. In addition, both CD9 and CD81 EVs were measured by SP-IRIS to be in the 50-80 nm range, also consistent with exosomes. Finally, images that appeared to capture CD9 and RANK being packaged into the same exosomes in osteoclasts were presented[12]. However, better data, perhaps by direct live visualization of RANK-EV release, will be required to resolve this question.
Both CD9 and CD81 have been functionally implicated in osteoclast differentiation and function[26-28,33]. They have been suggested to play a role in the fusion of osteoclast precursors to form the mature multinuclear osteoclasts, but there are significant differences in the reports. One study suggested CD9 and CD81 inhibited cell fusion[28], while another argues that CD9 was required for cell fusion[26]. Finally, it was pointed out that osteoclasts express a variety of tetraspanins, including CD9 and CD81, and several other proteins, and these may work together in complex ways to support cell fusion[33]. Of the twelve tetraspanins identified, only CD82 was detected in osteoclast EVs by mass spectrometry[24]. Lipid raft formation triggered by increased CD9 is described as an important consequence of stimulation of osteoclasts through the RANKL/RANK interaction[26]. Such rafts may serve as platforms for new signaling pathways[34]. They may also serve in the formation of EVs[34,35]. This provides a potential mechanistic basis that is testable for links between CD9 and RANK in EVs.
This study is limited by the small number of proteins examined and by the use of only two techniques, SP-IRIS and immunomagnetic isolation. The use of more markers and other techniques, such as ZetaView (Particle Matrix), which combines nanoparticle tracking with fluorescent labeling, will likely lead to a more detailed understanding of the subpopulations of EVs released by osteoclasts, including the subpopulation containing RANK. This study does not address the mechanism of the association between RANK and CD9 but does generate testable questions regarding whether RANK-EV are microvesicles or exosomes, and whether RANK-EV generation is linked to lipid rafts. Finally, this study is in mice. Although mice have proven a useful model for bone remodeling, future studies using human cells would be useful.
In conclusion, for the first time, we show that RANK is enriched in a subpopulation of CD9-containing EVs. This suggests that the packaging of RANK into EVs occurs along a distinct EV production pathway. Currently, the underlying mechanisms for selectively packaging of RANK or CD9 into EVs are not known. However, as this pathway is elucidated, means to stimulate the pathway and enhance the packaging of RANK into osteoclast EVs may be identified. Therapeutic stimulation of the number of RANK-containing EVs released by osteoclasts provides an attractive approach to treating osteoporosis. Because RANK-containing EVs simultaneously inhibit bone resorption and stimulate bone formation, increasing their production locally would be expected to be a potent means to therapeutically increase bone density.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Acquisition of data: Ruan S, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP, Holliday LS
Analysis and Interpretation of Data: Ruan S, Rody Jr WJ, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP Daaboul G, Anderson LS, He M, Holliday LS
Draft of the manuscript: Ruan S, He M, Holliday LS
Review of the manuscript: Ruan S, Rody Jr WJ, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP, Daaboul G, Anderson LS, He M, Holliday LS
Approval of the submitted manuscript: He M, Holliday LS
Read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript: Ruan S, Rody Jr WJ, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP, Daaboul G, Anderson LS, He M
Availability of Data and Materials
Data and materials supporting the published data will be shared on reasonable requests.
Financial support and sponsorship
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health under Awards Number R21DE019862 (LSH); and R03DE027504 (WJR, Jr); and a University of Florida College of Dentistry Seed Grant (WJR, Jr, LSH). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Conflicts of interest
Daaboul G and Anderson LS were employed by NanoView Bioscience, Brighton MA at the time of the study.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The University of Florida Institutional Animal Care and Usage Committee approved all mouse protocols (University of Florida IACUC protocol number: 20180303097; most recent approval 6/4/2021-6/4/2024). The study adhered to the ARRIVE guidelines. All procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health of the United States.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
REFERENCES
1. Lacey DL, Timms E, Tan HL, et al. Osteoprotegerin ligand is a cytokine that regulates osteoclast differentiation and activation. Cell 1998;93:165-76.
2. Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:3597-602.
4. Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, et al. 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:513-23.
5. Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Effect of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases by baseline characteristics. Eur J Cancer 2016;53:75-83.
6. Deng L, Wang Y, Peng Y, et al. Osteoblast-derived microvesicles: a novel mechanism for communication between osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Bone 2015;79:37-42.
7. Cappariello A, Loftus A, Muraca M, Maurizi A, Rucci N, Teti A. Osteoblast-derived extracellular vesicles are biological tools for the delivery of active molecules to bone. J Bone Miner Res 2018;33:517-33.
8. Huynh N, VonMoss L, Smith D, et al. Characterization of regulatory extracellular vesicles from osteoclasts. J Dent Res 2016;95:673-9.
9. Holliday LS, Patel SS, Rody WJ Jr. RANKL and RANK in extracellular vesicles: surprising new players in bone remodeling. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids 2021;2:18-28.
10. Liu H, Geng Z, Su JC. Engineered mammalian and bacterial extracellular vesicles as promising nanocarriers for targeted therapy. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids 2022;3:63-86.
11. Marton N, Kovács OT, Baricza E, et al. Extracellular vesicles regulate the human osteoclastogenesis: divergent roles in discrete inflammatory arthropathies. Cell Mol Life Sci 2017;74:3599-611.
12. Ikebuchi Y, Aoki S, Honma M, et al. Coupling of bone resorption and formation by RANKL reverse signalling. Nature 2018;561:195-200.
13. Kobayashi-Sun J, Yamamori S, Kondo M, et al. Uptake of osteoblast-derived extracellular vesicles promotes the differentiation of osteoclasts in the zebrafish scale. Commun Biol 2020;3:190.
14. Sims NA, Martin TJ. Osteoclasts provide coupling signals to osteoblast lineage cells through multiple mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol 2020;82:507-29.
15. Zhang S, Liu C, Huang P, et al. The affinity of human RANK binding to its ligand RANKL. Arch Biochem Biophys 2009;487:49-53.
16. Yang Z, Yang Z, Ding L, et al. Nanoengineering multifunctional extracellular vesicles availably mitigate bone loss in osteoporosis through binding to RANKL and rebalancing the Treg/Th17 cells. Chem Eng J 2023;467:143391.
17. Kong YY, Yoshida H, Sarosi I, et al. OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis. Nature 1999;397:315-23.
18. Kong YY, Boyle WJ, Penninger JM. Osteoprotegerin ligand: a common link between osteoclastogenesis, lymph node formation and lymphocyte development. Immunol Cell Biol 1999;77:188-93.
19. Daaboul GG, Gagni P, Benussi L, et al. Digital detection of exosomes by interferometric imaging. Sci Rep 2016;6:37246.
20. Silva AM, Lázaro-Ibáñez E, Gunnarsson A, et al. Quantification of protein cargo loading into engineered extracellular vesicles at single-vesicle and single-molecule resolution. J Extracell Vesicles 2021;10:e12130.
21. Hurst IR, Zuo J, Jiang J, Holliday LS. Actin-related protein 2/3 complex is required for actin ring formation. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:499-506.
22. Vracar TC, Zuo J, Park J, et al. Enoxacin and bis-enoxacin stimulate 4T1 murine breast cancer cells to release extracellular vesicles that inhibit osteoclastogenesis. Sci Rep 2018;8:16182.
23. Murray JB, Mikhael C, Han G, de Faria LP, Rody WJ Jr, Holliday LS. Activation of (pro)renin by (pro)renin receptor in extracellular vesicles from osteoclasts. Sci Rep 2021;11:9214.
24. Rody WJ Jr, Chamberlain CA, Emory-Carter AK, et al. The proteome of extracellular vesicles released by clastic cells differs based on their substrate. PLoS One 2019;14:e0219602.
25. Rody WJ Jr, Krokhin O, Spicer V, et al. The use of cell culture platforms to identify novel markers of bone and dentin resorption. Orthod Craniofac Res 2017;20 Suppl 1:89-94.
26. Ishii M, Iwai K, Koike M, et al. RANKL-induced expression of tetraspanin CD9 in lipid raft membrane microdomain is essential for cell fusion during osteoclastogenesis. J Bone Miner Res 2006;21:965-76.
27. Yi T, Kim HJ, Cho JY, et al. Tetraspanin CD9 regulates osteoclastogenesis via regulation of p44/42 MAPK activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;347:178-84.
28. Takeda Y, Tachibana I, Miyado K, et al. Tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 function to prevent the fusion of mononuclear phagocytes. J Cell Biol 2003;161:945-56.
29. Sone E, Noshiro D, Ikebuchi Y, et al. The induction of RANKL molecule clustering could stimulate early osteoblast differentiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2019;509:435-40.
30. Mathieu M, Névo N, Jouve M, et al. Specificities of exosome versus small ectosome secretion revealed by live intracellular tracking of CD63 and CD9. Nat Commun 2021;12:4389.
31. Iwai K, Ishii M, Ohshima S, Miyatake K, Saeki Y. Abundant expression of tetraspanin CD9 in activated osteoclasts in ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis and in bone erosions of collagen-induced arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2008;28:225-31.
32. Mathieu M, Martin-Jaular L, Lavieu G, Théry C. Specificities of secretion and uptake of exosomes and other extracellular vesicles for cell-to-cell communication. Nat Cell Biol 2019;21:9-17.
33. Iwai K, Ishii M, Ohshima S, Miyatake K, Saeki Y. Expression and function of transmembrane-4 superfamily (tetraspanin) proteins in osteoclasts: reciprocal roles of Tspan-5 and NET-6 during osteoclastogenesis. Allergol Int 2007;56:457-63.
34. Ouweneel AB, Thomas MJ, Sorci-Thomas MG. The ins and outs of lipid rafts: functions in intracellular cholesterol homeostasis, microparticles, and cell membranes: thematic review series: biology of lipid rafts. J Lipid Res 2020;61:676-86.
Cite This Article
Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS
OAE Style
Ruan S, Rody Jr WJ, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP, Daaboul G, Anderson LS, He M, Holliday LS. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B is enriched in CD9-positive extracellular vesicles released by osteoclasts. Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucleic Acids 2023;4:518-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2023.38
AMA Style
Ruan S, Rody Jr WJ, Patel SS, Hammadi LI, Martin ML, de Faria LP, Daaboul G, Anderson LS, He M, Holliday LS. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B is enriched in CD9-positive extracellular vesicles released by osteoclasts. Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids. 2023; 4(3): 518-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2023.38
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ruan, Shaobo, Wellington J. Rody Jr, Shivani S. Patel, Lina I. Hammadi, Macey L. Martin, Lorraine P. de Faria, George Daaboul, Leif S. Anderson, Mei He, Lexie Shannon Holliday. 2023. "Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B is enriched in CD9-positive extracellular vesicles released by osteoclasts" Extracellular Vesicles and Circulating Nucleic Acids. 4, no.3: 518-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2023.38
ACS Style
Ruan, S.; Rody Jr WJ.; Patel SS.; Hammadi LI.; Martin ML.; de Faria LP.; Daaboul G.; Anderson LS.; He M.; Holliday LS. Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B is enriched in CD9-positive extracellular vesicles released by osteoclasts. Extracell. Vesicles. Circ. Nucleic. Acids. 2023, 4, 518-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/evcna.2023.38
About This Article
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data
0
Cite This Article 23 clicks
Like This Article 4
likes
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.