REFERENCES

1. Xiao, L.; Yin, B.; Geng, Z.; Li, J.; Jia, R.; Zhang, K. Flexible wearable devices based on self-powered energy supply. Nano. Energy. 2025, 142, 111157.

2. Jin, S.; Yu, J.; Kan, C. W.; Zhang, C.; Tsoi, J. K. Self-powered and biocompatible electrospun PVDF/ZrO2 based piezoelectric energy harvesting device for oral health monitoring and dental care. Dent. Mater. 2026, 42, 1476-87.

3. Wang, Z. L.; Song, J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 2006, 312, 242-6.

4. Pawar, O. Y.; Lu, B.; Lim, S. Enhanced flexible piezoelectric nanogenerators using ethanol-exfoliated g-C3N4/PVDF composites via 3D printing for self-powered applications. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1578.

5. Gołąbek, J.; Strankowski, M. A review of recent advances in human-motion energy harvesting nanogenerators, self-powering smart sensors and self-charging electronics. Sensors 2024, 24, 1069.

6. Li, Z.; Zhu, G.; Yang, R.; Wang, A. C.; Wang, Z. L. Muscle-driven in vivo nanogenerator. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 2534-7.

7. Marino, A.; Arai, S.; Hou, Y.; et al. Piezoelectric nanoparticle-assisted wireless neuronal stimulation. ACS. Nano. 2015, 9, 7678-89.

8. Qian, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Song, J.; et al. Mechano-informed biomimetic polymer scaffolds by incorporating self-powered zinc oxide nanogenerators enhance motor recovery and neural function. Small 2020, 16, e2000796.

9. Chen, P.; Wu, P.; Wan, X.; et al. Ultrasound-driven electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves based on implantable piezoelectric thin film nanogenerators. Nano. Energy. 2021, 86, 106123.

10. Wu, P.; Chen, P.; Xu, C.; et al. Ultrasound-driven in vivo electrical stimulation based on biodegradable piezoelectric nanogenerators for enhancing and monitoring the nerve tissue repair. Nano. Energy. 2022, 102, 107707.

11. Chen, P.; Cheng, C.; Yang, X.; et al. Wireless deep brain stimulation by ultrasound-responsive molecular piezoelectric nanogenerators. ACS. Nano. 2023, 17, 25625-37.

12. Li, T.; Wei, Z.; Jin, F.; et al. Soft ferroelectret ultrasound receiver for targeted peripheral neuromodulation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8386.

13. Zeng, Y.; Gong, C.; Lu, G.; et al. A programmable and self-adaptive ultrasonic wireless implant for personalized chronic pain management. Nat. Electron. 2025, 8, 437-49.

14. Dai, F.; Cheng, H.; Qi, H.; et al. Rochelle salt-based biodegradable piezoelectric devices for nerve regeneration and intestinal motility monitoring. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 2169.

15. Zhao, D.; Zhong, G.; Cao, Z.; et al. Piezoelectric neuromodulation of the subthalamic nucleus ameliorates motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Adv. 2026, 12, eaec6955.

16. Yang, X.; Huo, N.; Zhou, H.; Li, S.; Fang, M.; Zhou, N. Application strategies of autologous and decellularized nerve grafts: structural and functional recovery. Neural. Regen. Res. 2026, 21, 2843-62.

17. Li, K.; Wu, X.; Xiong, P.; et al. Electroactive dual-drug hydrogel-PLA conduit for nerve regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 2026, 114, e70066.

18. Ghanem, W.; Ezzeddine, H.; Najjar, J.; et al. Vascularized nerve grafts: current concepts, indications, and future perspectives. Orthop. Rev. 2026, 18, 156463.

19. Gungordu Er, S.; Edirisinghe, M. Graphene for self-powered biosensors: a perspective. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2025, 22, 20250479.

20. Almas, T.; Haider, R.; Malik, J.; et al. Nanotechnology in interventional cardiology: a state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Cardiol. Heart. Vasc. 2022, 43, 101149.

21. Kim, T.; Kim, H. J.; Choi, W.; et al. Deep brain stimulation by blood-brain-barrier-crossing piezoelectric nanoparticles generating current and nitric oxide under focused ultrasound. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 7, 149-63.

22. Lans, J.; Eberlin, K. R.; Evans, P. J.; Mercer, D.; Greenberg, J. A.; Styron, J. F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nerve gap repair: comparative effectiveness of allografts, autografts, and conduits. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2023, 151, 814e-27e.

23. Xu, D.; Fu, S.; Zhang, H.; et al. Ultrasound-responsive aligned piezoelectric nanofibers derived hydrogel conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2307896.

24. Wang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, H.; et al. Lead-free dual-frequency ultrasound implants for wireless, biphasic deep brain stimulation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4017.

25. Wang, L.; Li, X.; Jin, Q.; et al. Ultrasound-driven piezoelectret-based nanogenerator stimulates vagus nerve for myocardial infarction treatment. Nano. Energy. 2024, 128, 109864.

26. Chen, Y. X.; Feng, P. J.; Zhong, G.; et al. Piezoelectric nanogenerators enabled neuromodulation rescued dopaminergic neuron loss in Parkinson’s disease. Nano. Energy. 2024, 121, 109187.

27. Li, T.; Yuan, Y.; Gu, L.; et al. Ultrastable piezoelectric biomaterial nanofibers and fabrics as an implantable and conformal electromechanical sensor patch. Sci. Adv. 2024, 10, eadn8706.

28. Shan, Y.; Wang, E.; Cui, X.; et al. A biodegradable piezoelectric sensor for real-time evaluation of the motor function recovery after nerve injury. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2400295.

29. Wu, R. T.; Lu, J. C. Y. Nerve autograft: preservation of a lost art. Hand. Clin. 2024, 40, 347-56.

30. Dishon Ben Ami, S.; Pinsk, N.; Hartstein, M.; et al. Piezoelectricity from dopant-induced structural distortions in molecular crystals revealed by Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, 148, 30029-36.

31. Pan, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, G.; Cai, H. Mechanical energy harvesting based on the piezoelectric materials: recent advances and future perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 497, 154249.

32. Deng, W.; Zhou, Y.; Libanori, A.; Chen, G.; Yang, W.; Chen, J. Piezoelectric nanogenerators for personalized healthcare. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2022, 51, 3380-435.

33. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Zheng, Y.; Yang, Z. Design and manufacturing of piezoelectric biomaterials for bioelectronics and biomedical applications. Chem. Rev. 2025, 125, 9875-929.

34. Jeong, C. K.; Park, K. I.; Ryu, J.; Hwang, G. T.; Lee, K. J. Large-area and flexible lead-free nanocomposite generator using alkaline niobate particles and metal nanorod filler. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 2620-9.

35. Liu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Qu, X.; et al. A self-powered optogenetic system for implantable blood glucose control. Research 2022, 2022, 9864734.

36. Mahapatra, S. D.; Mohapatra, P. C.; Aria, A. I.; et al. Piezoelectric materials for energy harvesting and sensing applications: roadmap for future smart materials. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, e2100864.

37. Zhang, Y.; Kim, H.; Wang, Q.; et al. Progress in lead-free piezoelectric nanofiller materials and related composite nanogenerator devices. Nanoscale. Adv. 2020, 2, 3131-49.

38. Jeon, S.; Kim, D.; Jo, M. Y.; et al. Wireless acousto-piezoelectric conduit with aligned nanofibers for neural regeneration. Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, e03343.

39. Pathak, P. K.; Dasgupta Ghosh, B. Cellulose-based biodegradable and flexible piezoelectric materials toward energy-harvesting systems: a review. ACS. Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2026, 12, 2825-50.

40. KarbalaeiMahdi, A.; Moridi, K.; Esmaeili, Z.; Seifalian, N.; Chauhan, N. P. S.; Seifalian, A. M. Piezoelectric materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: from fundamental principles to clinical applications. Acta. Biomater. 2026, 217, 44-70.

41. Nain, A.; Chakraborty, S.; Barman, S. R.; et al. Progress in the development of piezoelectric biomaterials for tissue remodeling. Biomaterials 2024, 307, 122528.

42. Krutko, M.; Poling, H. M.; Sheth, M.; et al. Thermal annealing enhances piezoelectricity and regenerative potential of PVDF-TrFE nanofiber scaffolds. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2025, 10, e01513.

43. Westphal, J. A.; Bryan, A. E.; Krutko, M.; Esfandiari, L.; Schutte, S. C.; Harris, G. M. Innervation of an ultrasound-mediated PVDF-TrFE scaffold for skin-tissue engineering. Biomimetics 2023, 9, 2.

44. Gryshkov, O.; Al Halabi, F.; Kuhn, A. I.; et al. PVDF and P(VDF-TrFE) electrospun scaffolds for nerve graft engineering: a comparative study on piezoelectric and structural properties, and in vitro biocompatibility. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11373.

45. Gaur, A.; Abebe, A.; Porwal, C.; et al. Interfacial Schottky junction induced enhanced piezocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 22065.

46. Aphayvong, S.; Verma, A.; Nakamura, K.; et al. Polarity-dependent charge transport and resistance degradation enabled by oxygen-vacancy gradients in BiFeO3 films. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026, 18, 36891-901.

47. Fan, L.; Dai, Z.; Bai, X.; et al. (K,Na)NbO3-based lead-free ceramic/polyvinylidene fluoride piezoelectric composite for biomimetic wound healing via endogenous electric field simulation. Biomater. Adv. 2026, 186, 214909.

48. Bian, T.; Jiang, Y.; Cao, J.; Wu, W.; Zhang, L.; Yang, Y. Fabrication of piezoelectric/conductive composite nerve conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Colloids. Surf. B. Biointerfaces. 2025, 250, 114544.

49. Kim, H.; Narayanan, K. B.; Kumar, V.; Han, S. S.; Bhaskar, R. Piezoelectric nanocomposite patch for self-powered bioelectrical stimulation for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomater. Adv. 2026, 182, 214717.

50. Mistewicz, K.; Jesionek, M.; Kim, H. J.; et al. Nanogenerator for determination of acoustic power in ultrasonic reactors. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 78, 105718.

51. Wu, S.; Chen, M. S.; Maurel, P.; Lee, Y. S.; Bunge, M. B.; Arinzeh, T. L. Aligned fibrous PVDF-TrFE scaffolds with Schwann cells support neurite extension and myelination in vitro. J. Neural. Eng. 2018, 15, 056010.

52. Curry, E. J.; Le, T. T.; Das, R.; et al. Biodegradable nanofiber-based piezoelectric transducer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020, 117, 214-20.

53. Demirbilek, M.; Sakar, M.; Karahaliloğlu, Z.; et al. Aligned bacterial PHBV nanofibrous conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration. Artif. Cells. Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2015, 43, 243-51.

54. Karbowniczek, J. E.; İlhan, P.; Szewczyk, P. K.; et al. A sustainable alternative to PVDF for neural tissue engineering via piezoelectric PHBV and cellulose acetate fibers. ACS. Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2026, 12, 2684-99.

55. Ceballos, D.; Navarro, X.; Dubey, N.; Wendelschafer-Crabb, G.; Kennedy, W. R.; Tranquillo, R. T. Magnetically aligned collagen gel filling a collagen nerve guide improves peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp. Neurol. 1999, 158, 290-300.

56. Bera, S.; Guerin, S.; Yuan, H.; et al. Molecular engineering of piezoelectricity in collagen-mimicking peptide assemblies. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 2634.

57. Jin, L.; Tai, Y.; Nam, J. Piezoelectric silk fibroin nanofibers: structural optimization to enhance piezoelectricity and biostability for neural tissue engineering. Nano. Energy. 2024, 132, 110367.

58. Zhen, W.; Chen, J.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y. Piezoelectric fibers based on silk fibroin with excellent output performance. Chin. Phys. B. 2024, 33, 088701.

59. Zhu, G.; Wang, A. C.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Z. L. Functional electrical stimulation by nanogenerator with 58 V output voltage. Nano. Lett. 2012, 12, 3086-90.

60. Ciofani, G.; Danti, S.; D’Alessandro, D.; et al. Enhancement of neurite outgrowth in neuronal-like cells following boron nitride nanotube-mediated stimulation. ACS. Nano. 2010, 4, 6267-77.

61. Eslami, R.; Malekkhouyan, A.; Santhirakumaran, P.; Mehrvar, M.; Zarrin, H. High-performance flexible nanogenerators based on piezoelectric hBN-induced polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers. Mater. Today. Chem. 2023, 30, 101609.

62. Luo, C.; Omelchenko, I.; Manson, R.; et al. Direct intracochlear acoustic stimulation using a PZT microactuator. Trends. Hear. 2015, 19, 2331216515616942.

63. Wen, J.; Liu, M. Piezoelectric ceramic (PZT) modulates axonal guidance growth of rat cortical neurons via RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 pathways. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2014, 52, 323-30.

64. Jang, J.; Jang, J. H.; Choi, H. MEMS flexible artificial basilar membrane fabricated from piezoelectric aluminum nitride on an SU-8 substrate. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2017, 27, 075006.

65. Zhao, C.; Knisely, K. E.; Colesa, D. J.; Pfingst, B. E.; Raphael, Y.; Grosh, K. Voltage readout from a piezoelectric intracochlear acoustic transducer implanted in a living guinea pig. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 3711.

66. Cheng, Y.; Xu, Y.; Qian, Y.; Chen, X.; Ouyang, Y. M.; Yuan, W. E. 3D structured self-powered PVDF/PCL scaffolds for peripheral nerve regeneratione. Nano. Energy. 2020, 69, 104411.

67. You, Y. M.; Liao, W. Q.; Zhao, D.; et al. An organic-inorganic perovskite ferroelectric with large piezoelectric response. Science 2017, 357, 306-9.

68. Ramburrun, P.; Kumar, P.; Choonara, Y. E.; du Toit, L. C.; Pillay, V. Design and characterisation of PHBV-magnesium oleate directional nanofibers for neurosupport. Biomed. Mater. 2019, 14, 065015.

69. Ensarioğlu, K.; Şen, M.; Yüzer, E.; et al. Bifunctional peptide-conjugated vertically aligned tubular nanofibrous conduits for enhanced vascularization and nerve regeneration. Biomater. Adv. 2026, 185, 214879.

70. Azimi, S.; Golabchi, A.; Nekookar, A.; et al. Self-powered cardiac pacemaker by piezoelectric polymer nanogenerator implant. Nano. Energy. 2021, 83, 105781.

71. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Gao, X.; et al. Performance-enhanced flexible piezoelectric nanogenerator via layer-by-layer assembly for self-powered vagal neuromodulation. Nano. Energy. 2021, 89, 106319.

72. Ma, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, Q.; Cao, X.; Gao, H. Piezoelectric conduit combined with multi-channel conductive scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139424.

73. Tai, Y.; Tonmoy, T. I.; Win, S.; Brinkley, N. T.; Park, B. H.; Nam, J. Enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration by mechano-electrical stimulation. NPJ. Regen. Med. 2023, 8, 57.

74. Qi, T.; Wang, X.; Han, Y.; He, C. Suture-free piezoelectric band-aid membrane for complex peripheral nerve defects. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026, 18, 38678-94.

75. Singh, A. N.; Nam, K. W. Gel-based self-powered nanogenerators: materials, mechanisms, and emerging opportunities. Gels 2025, 11, 451.

76. Kumar, V.; Alam, M. N.; Azam, S.; Park, S. S. Robust composites based on silicone rubber for self-powered piezoelectric nanogenerators. Polymers 2025, 17, 977.

77. Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, R.; et al. Progress in wearable acoustical sensors for diagnostic applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 237, 115509.

78. Wang, D.; Liu, W.; Gu, L.; et al. Instantaneous piezoelectric nanogenerator for pacemaker applications. Nano. Energy. 2025, 138, 110828.

79. Lu, B.; Chen, Y.; Ou, D.; et al. Ultra-flexible piezoelectric devices integrated with heart to harvest the biomechanical energy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16065.

80. Cheng, X.; Xue, X.; Ma, Y.; et al. Implantable and self-powered blood pressure monitoring based on a piezoelectric thinfilm: simulated, in vitro and in vivo studies. Nano. Energy. 2016, 22, 453-60.

81. Yu, Y.; Sun, H.; Orbay, H.; et al. Biocompatibility and in vivo operation of implantable mesoporous PVDF-based nanogenerators. Nano. Energy. 2016, 27, 275-81.

82. Zhang, Z.; Yao, C.; Yu, Y.; Hong, Z.; Zhi, M.; Wang, X. Mesoporous piezoelectric polymer composite films with tunable mechanical modulus for harvesting energy from liquid pressure fluctuation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 6760-5.

83. Yang, T.; Pan, H.; Tian, G.; et al. Hierarchically structured PVDF/ZnO core-shell nanofibers for self-powered physiological monitoring electronics. Nano. Energy. 2020, 72, 104706.

84. Mao, R.; Yu, B.; Cui, J.; et al. Piezoelectric stimulation from electrospun composite nanofibers for rapid peripheral nerve regeneration. Nano. Energy. 2022, 98, 107322.

85. Razbin, M.; Ruan, K.; Tahir, D.; et al. Sustainable P3HB:ZnO composite piezoelectric nanofibers for AI-driven gait monitoring. Small. Sci. 2026, 6, e70355.

86. Ter Haar, H. Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations. Interface. Focus. 2011, 1, 686-97.

87. Nelson, T. R.; Fowlkes, J. B.; Abramowicz, J. S.; Church, C. C. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sonologist. J. Ultrasound. Med. 2009, 28, 139-50.

88. Fry, F. J.; Barger, J. E. Acoustical properties of the human skull. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 63, 1576-90.

89. Zhang, T.; Liang, H.; Wang, Z.; et al. Piezoelectric ultrasound energy-harvesting device for deep brain stimulation and analgesia applications. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabk0159.

90. Lozano, A. M.; Lipsman, N.; Bergman, H.; et al. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2019, 15, 148-60.

91. Montgomery, K. L.; Yeh, A. J.; Ho, J. S.; et al. Wirelessly powered, fully internal optogenetics for brain, spinal and peripheral circuits in mice. Nat. Methods. 2015, 12, 969-74.

92. Cafarelli, A.; Marino, A.; Vannozzi, L.; et al. Piezoelectric nanomaterials activated by ultrasound: the pathway from discovery to future clinical adoption. ACS. Nano. 2021, 15, 11066-86.

93. Xu, S.; Manshaii, F.; Xiao, X.; Yin, J.; Chen, J. Triboelectric nanogenerators for self-powered neurostimulation. Nano. Res. 2024, 17, 8926-41.

94. Kozielski, K. L.; Jahanshahi, A.; Gilbert, H. B.; et al. Nonresonant powering of injectable nanoelectrodes enables wireless deep brain stimulation in freely moving mice. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabc4189.

95. Cosnier, S.; Le Goff, A.; Holzinger, M. Towards glucose biofuel cells implanted in human body for powering artificial organs: review. Electrochem. Commun. 2014, 38, 19-23.

96. He, Y.; Yang, X.; Yuan, M.; et al. Wireless discharge of piezoelectric nanogenerator opens voltage-gated ion channels for calcium overload-mediated tumor treatment. Biomaterials 2025, 321, 123311.

97. Han, M.; Yildiz, E.; Bozuyuk, U.; et al. Janus microparticles-based targeted and spatially-controlled piezoelectric neural stimulation via low-intensity focused ultrasound. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2013.

98. Genchi, G. G.; Ceseracciu, L.; Marino, A.; et al. P(VDF-TrFE)/BaTiO3 nanoparticle composite films mediate piezoelectric stimulation and promote differentiation of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016, 5, 1808-20.

99. Hoop, M.; Chen, X. Z.; Ferrari, A.; et al. Ultrasound-mediated piezoelectric differentiation of neuron-like PC12 cells on PVDF membranes. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4028.

100. Liu, L.; Chen, B.; Liu, K.; et al. Wireless manipulation of magnetic/piezoelectric micromotors for precise neural stem-like cell stimulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910108.

101. Fan, C. H.; Tsai, H. C.; Tsai, Y. S.; et al. Selective activation of cells by piezoelectric molybdenum disulfide nanosheets with focused ultrasound. ACS. Nano. 2023, 17, 9140-54.

102. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, J.; Xie, X.; et al. Cell-anchored lead-free piezoelectric KNN NPs resisting washout for low-intensity ultrasound driven neuromodulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024, 34, 2406919.

103. Kong, Y.; Liu, F.; Ma, B.; et al. Wireless localized electrical stimulation generated by an ultrasound-driven piezoelectric discharge regulates proinflammatory macrophage polarization. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2100962.

104. Gao, H.; Wu, W.; Chen, X.; et al. A sono-piezoelectric scaffold prompts disc regeneration by activating Ca2+/CaMKII/Parkin-mediated mitophagy. Biomaterials 2026, 334, 124316.

105. Liu, J.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z.; et al. Dynamic stimulation of piezoelectric scaffolds enhances osteogenesis-related biological responses via electro-mechanical sensitive channels and cytoskeletal remodeling. Biomaterials 2026, 329, 123938.

106. Jiang, F.; Shan, Y.; Tian, J.; et al. Poly(l-lactic acid) nanofiber-based multilayer film for the electrical stimulation of nerve cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2023, 10, 2202474.

107. Wayman, G. A.; Impey, S.; Marks, D.; et al. Activity-dependent dendritic arborization mediated by CaM-kinase I activation and enhanced CREB-dependent transcription of Wnt-2. Neuron 2006, 50, 897-909.

108. Yan, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, Z.; et al. CaMKII-mediated CREB phosphorylation is involved in Ca2+-induced BDNF mRNA transcription and neurite outgrowth promoted by electrical stimulation. PLoS. One. 2016, 11, e0162784.

109. Wang, W.; Liu, W.; Zhu, H.; et al. Electrical stimulation promotes BDNF expression in spinal cord neurons through Ca2+- and ERK-dependent signaling pathways. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011, 31, 459-67.

110. Spencer, T. K.; Mellado, W.; Filbin, M. T. BDNF activates CaMKIV and PKA in parallel to block MAG-mediated inhibition of neurite outgrowth. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2008, 38, 110-6.

111. Cohen, S. M.; Suutari, B.; He, X.; et al. Calmodulin shuttling mediates cytonuclear signaling to trigger experience-dependent transcription and memory. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2451.

112. Huang, J.; Ye, Z.; Hu, X.; Lu, L.; Luo, Z. Electrical stimulation induces calcium-dependent release of NGF from cultured Schwann cells. Glia 2010, 58, 622-31.

113. Jiang, L.; Lu, G.; Zeng, Y.; et al. Flexible ultrasound-induced retinal stimulating piezo-arrays for biomimetic visual prostheses. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3853.

114. Cogan, S. F. Neural stimulation and recording electrodes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 10, 275-309.

115. Li, X.; Yan, S.; Li, M.; et al. Piezoelectric nanoparticle-driven rhythmic ultrasound neuromodulation for treatment of early-stage Alzheimer’s disease. Biomaterials 2026, 328, 123905.

116. Shannon, R. V. A model of safe levels for electrical stimulation. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1992, 39, 424-6.

117. McCreery, D. B.; Agnew, W. F.; Yuen, T. G. H.; Bullara, L. A. Charge density and charge per phase as cofactors in neural injury induced by electrical stimulation. IEEE. Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1990, 37, 996-1001.

118. Zhang, J.; Li, F.; Gao, X.; et al. Bamboo-inspired composite conduit accelerates peripheral nerve regeneration through synergistic oriented structure and piezoelectricity. Adv. Mater. 2026, 38, e09425.

119. Pi, W.; Rao, F.; Cao, J.; et al. Sono-electro-mechanical therapy for peripheral nerve regeneration through piezoelectric nanotracts. Nano. Today. 2023, 50, 101860.

120. Huang, L.; Zhu, L.; Shi, X.; et al. A compound scaffold with uniform longitudinally oriented guidance cues and a porous sheath promotes peripheral nerve regeneration in vivo. Acta. Biomater. 2018, 68, 223-36.

121. Chen, G.; Hu, Q.; Tang, C.; et al. Biodegradable piezoelectric amino acid nerve guidance conduit repairs long-gap nerve defect under low frequency vibration from massage gun. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026, 36, e10947.

122. Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Huang, X.; Zhang, S.; Chang, S.; Wang, P. Liquid metal-ZnO enhanced piezoelectric PVDF nanofibrous nerve guidance conduit: self-powered electrical stimulation for accelerated peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomater. Adv. 2026, 180, 214566.

123. Zhou, D.; Bian, M.; Wei, L.; et al. Stepwise regulation of cellular oxidative stress via conductive-piezoelectric integrated microstructured conduits for enhanced nerve regeneration. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e16124.

124. Qi, T.; Wang, X.; Wu, L.; et al. Multidimensional oriented piezoelectric conduits for peripheral nerve defect regeneration. Small 2026, 22, e14376.

125. Yin, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhan, G.; et al. A self-powered biodegradable electroactive conduit with sustained NGF release for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration via mitochondrial bioenergetic activation. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2026, 18, 29676-94.

126. Jin, F.; Li, T.; Wei, Z.; et al. Biofeedback electrostimulation for bionic and long-lasting neural modulation. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5302.

127. Hu, C.; Liu, B.; Huang, X.; et al. Sea cucumber-inspired microneedle nerve guidance conduit for synergistically inhibiting muscle atrophy and promoting nerve regeneration. ACS. Nano. 2024, 18, 14427-40.

128. Wang, Y.; Tian, J.; Xu, Z.; et al. A millimeter-scale implantable magneto-mechano-electric transducer based on BTO piezoelectric ceramics for remote wireless electrical stimulation of injured sciatic nerves. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e75833.

129. Lv, Y.; Zhan, L.; Yao, X.; et al. Piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene/reduced graphene oxide/polycaprolactone fiber material: modulating neutrophil extracellular traps and reshaping the immune microenvironment in peripheral nerves. Adv. Fiber. Mater. 2025, 7, 645-63.

130. Tan, R.; Zhang, S.; Jia, W.; et al. Exercise-induced stimulation of self-powered nanofibers for aspirin/lysine delivery in the prevention of denervated muscle atrophy. ACS. Nano. 2025, 19, 31481-95.

131. Gu, H.; Zhao, S.; Gou, Y.; et al. Piezoelectric-hydrogen synergy in electrospun oriented fibrous scaffold enables multimodal repair of long-distance peripheral nerve defect. Regen. Biomater. 2026, 13, rbag156.

132. Nan, L.; Cao, W.; Fang, J.; et al. An implantable mechano-electro cascade platform synchronizes neuro-muscle repair. Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 7033.

133. Lee, Y. S.; Wu, S.; Arinzeh, T. L.; Bunge, M. B. Enhanced noradrenergic axon regeneration into Schwann cell-filled PVDF-TrFE conduits after complete spinal cord transection. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017, 114, 444-56.

134. Li, Z.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z. Piezoelectric composite hydrogel with wireless electrical stimulation enhances motor functional recovery of spinal cord injury. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 172, 228-39.

135. Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Y. A conductive piezoelectric hydrogel combined with perampanel and wireless electrical stimulation for spinal cord injury repair. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 493, 152238.

136. Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Tang, X.; et al. A biodegradable piezoelectric scaffold promotes spinal cord injury nerve regeneration. Nano. Energy. 2024, 132, 110382.

137. Shi, G.; Su, T.; Li, J.; et al. Biomimetic piezoelectric hydrogel system for energy metabolism reprogramming in spinal cord injury repair. Theranostics 2025, 15, 4955-69.

138. Zhong, H.; Zhou, M.; Guo, J.; et al. Ultrasound-driven wireless piezoelectric hydrogel synergizes with cotransplantation of NSCs-hUCMSCs for structural and functional recovery in spinal cord injury. Mater. Today. Bio. 2025, 32, 101805.

139. Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Ren, Y.; et al. Ultrasound-driven piezoelectric hydrogel enhances Schwann/neural stem cells co-transplantation for spinal cord injury repair. Mater. Des. 2025, 253, 113842.

140. Zhang, F.; He, X.; Dong, K.; et al. Combination therapy with ultrasound and 2D nanomaterials promotes recovery after spinal cord injury via Piezo1 downregulation. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2023, 21, 91.

141. Xiao, Z.; Li, T.; Zhang, L.; et al. Magnetically responsive piezoelectric nanocapacitors enhance neural recovery following spinal cord injury via targeted spinal magnetic stimulation. Adv. Sci. 2026, 13, e14954.

142. Cui, X.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Li, Z. Implantable self-powered systems for electrical stimulation medical devices. Adv. Sci. 2025, 12, e2412044.

143. Zhao, T.; Han, Y.; Qin, L.; et al. Bidirectional modulation of neural plasticity by self-powered neural stimulation. Nano. Energy. 2021, 85, 106006.

144. Yang, G.; Tang, Y.; Lin, T.; et al. A self-powered closed-loop brain-machine-interface system for real-time detecting and rapidly adjusting blood glucose concentration. Nano. Energy. 2022, 93, 106817.

145. Liang, S.; Han, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. A self-powered wearable body-detecting/brain-stimulating system for improving sports endurance performance. Nano. Energy. 2022, 93, 106851.

146. Xu, C.; Xie, Y.; Zhong, T.; et al. A self-powered wearable brain-machine-interface system for real-time monitoring and regulating body temperature. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 12483-90.

147. Xiang, W.; Xie, Y.; Han, Y.; et al. A self-powered wearable brain-machine-interface system for ceasing action. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 4671-8.

148. Lin, R.; Fan, Y.; Xie, Y.; et al. A self-powered wearable seizure-monitoring/brain-stimulating system for potential epilepsy treatment. Nano. Energy. 2023, 107, 108121.

149. Guan, H.; Tang, Y.; Long, Z.; et al. Cellphone remote intelligent neuroregulation with self-powered piezoelectric wireless brain probe. Nano. Energy. 2023, 106, 108105.

150. Tang, Q.; Li, D.; Chen, J.; et al. Ultrasound active piezoelectric nanostimulators for long-acting wireless deep brain electric stimulation to inhibit epileptic seizures. Adv. Mater. 2026, 38, e20447.

151. Hwang, G. T.; Park, H.; Lee, J. H.; et al. Self-powered cardiac pacemaker enabled by flexible single crystalline PMN-PT piezoelectric energy harvester. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4880-7.

152. Li, J.; Hacker, T. A.; Wei, H.; et al. Long-term in vivo operation of implanted cardiac nanogenerators in swine. Nano. Energy. 2021, 90, 106507.

153. Sun, Y.; Chao, S.; Ouyang, H.; et al. Hybrid nanogenerator based closed-loop self-powered low-level vagus nerve stimulation system for atrial fibrillation treatment. Sci. Bull. 2022, 67, 1284-94.

154. Mathews, R. P.; Habibagahi, I.; Jafari Sharemi, H.; Challita, R.; Cha, S.; Babakhani, A. A closed loop fully automated wireless vagus nerve stimulation system. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 27856.

155. Jing, T.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; et al. Magneto-responsive piezoelectric CoFe2O4-PVDF system for on-demand electrical modulation of infarcted myocardium. Mater. Today. Bio. 2026, 40, 103500.

156. Zhang, T.; Hu, H.; Jiang, H.; et al. KNN-based frequency-adjustable ferroelectric heterojunction and biomedical applications. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 7120.

157. Han, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; et al. Ultrasound-mediated piezoelectric nanoparticle modulation of intrinsic cardiac autonomic nervous system for rate control in atrial fibrillation. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 655-65.

158. Xu, X.; Qiao, J.; Wang, Y.; et al. PENG-based self-powered transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation attenuated myocardial infarction-induced heart-brain remodeling via ameliorating the neuroinflammatory response in central amygdala. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 162, 115085.

159. Spencer, N. J.; Hu, H. Enteric nervous system: sensory transduction, neural circuits and gastrointestinal motility. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 338-51.

160. Eberhardson, M.; Levine, Y. A.; Tarnawski, L.; Olofsson, P. S. The brain-gut axis, inflammatory bowel disease and bioelectronic medicine. Int. Immunol. 2021, 33, 349-56.

161. Jiang, Y.; Soffer, E. Electroceuticals for neurogastroenterology and motility disorders. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2023, 25, 91-7.

162. Dagdeviren, C.; Javid, F.; Joe, P.; et al. Flexible piezoelectric devices for gastrointestinal motility sensing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 1, 807-17.

163. Barth, B. B.; Travis, L.; Spencer, N. J.; Grill, W. M. Control of colonic motility using electrical stimulation to modulate enteric neural activity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver. Physiol. 2021, 320, G675-87.

164. Poling, H. M.; Singh, A.; Kongsomros, S.; et al. Promoting human intestinal organoid formation and stimulation using piezoelectric nanofiber matrices. Tissue. Eng. Part. A. 2026, 32, 604-15.

165. Mac, C. H.; Tai, H. M.; Huang, S. M.; et al. Orally ingested self-powered stimulators for targeted gut-brain axis electrostimulation to treat obesity and metabolic disorders. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, e2310351.

166. Mac, C. H.; Nguyen, G. L. T.; Nguyen, D. T. M.; et al. Noninvasive vagus nerve electrical stimulation for immune modulation in sepsis therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 8406-21.

167. Srinivasan, S.; Antonini, M. J.; Alshareef, A.; et al. Gastrointestinal neuroprosthesis for motility and metabolic neuromodulation. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 7374.

168. Bloem, B. R.; Okun, M. S.; Klein, C. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2021, 397, 2284-303.

169. Zhao, D.; Feng, P. J.; Liu, J. H.; et al. Electromagnetized-nanoparticle-modulated neural plasticity and recovery of degenerative dopaminergic neurons in the mid-brain. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e2003800.

170. Hou, J. F.; Nayeem, M. O. G.; Caplan, K. A.; et al. An implantable piezoelectric ultrasound stimulator (ImPULS) for deep brain activation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4601.

171. Cui, C.; Gao, X.; Li, J.; et al. Aggregation-enhanced piezoelectric nanotransducers facilitate transgene-free wireless neurostimulation under low-intensity focused ultrasound. ACS. Nano. 2026, 20, 835-48.

172. Song, M.; Xu, Q.; Li, D.; et al. Ultrasound-driven piezoelectric nanomaterial platform enables wireless neuromodulation for Parkinson’s disease. Acta. Biomater. 2026, 220, 225-44.

173. 2024 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers. Dement. 2024, 20, 3708-821.

174. Jack, C. R. Jr.; Andrews, J. S.; Beach, T. G.; et al. Revised criteria for diagnosis and staging of Alzheimer’s disease: Alzheimer’s association workgroup. Alzheimers. Dement. 2024, 20, 5143-69.

175. Jang, J.; Kim, K.; Yoon, J.; Park, C. B. Piezoelectric materials for ultrasound-driven dissociation of Alzheimer’s β-amyloid aggregate structure. Biomaterials 2020, 255, 120165.

176. Ning, S.; Sanchis-Gual, R.; Franco, C.; et al. Magnetic PiezoBOTs: a microrobotic approach for targeted amyloid protein dissociation. Nanoscale 2023, 15, 14800-8.

177. Sharma, M.; Choudhury, S.; Babu, A.; et al. Futuristic Alzheimer’s therapy: acoustic-stimulated piezoelectric nanospheres for amyloid reduction. Biomater. Sci. 2024, 12, 1801-21.

178. Yi, S.; Zou, J.; He, X.; et al. Transcranial ultrasound stimulation pulsed at 40 Hz improves cognition and neuroinflammation in female mice with Alzheimer's disease. Research 2026, 9, 1244.

179. Jang, J.; Joo, S.; Yeom, J.; et al. Lateral piezoelectricity of Alzheimer’s Aβ aggregates. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2406678.

180. Das, S.; Dolai, J.; Mukherjee, B.; Maity, A.; Jana, N. R. Ultrasound-based mechanochemical generation of reactive oxygen species from nanoparticle-conjugated amyloid fibrils. RSC. Mechanochem. 2025, 2, 556-62.

181. Das, S.; Dolai, J.; Roy, D.; Maity, A.; Jana, N. R. BaTiO3 nanorod-mediated sono-piezocatalytic disintegration of amyloid fibrils. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 37539-47.

182. Luo, K.; Zhang, B.; Mei, Y.; et al. A piezoelectric enhanced and self-calibrating SERS platform based on Ag nanocubes-modified polyvinylidene fluoride for ultrasensitive and simultaneous detection of Aβ40 and Aβ42. Sens. Actuators. B. Chem. 2026, 446, 138685.

183. Luo, K.; Zhang, B.; Mei, Y.; et al. Actively-modulated SERS detection of multiple biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in various body fluids by piezoelectric-charge-plasmonic nanocomposite film. Sens. Actuators. B. Chem. 2026, 451, 139430.

184. Qian, X.; Lu, G.; Thomas, B. B.; et al. Noninvasive ultrasound retinal stimulation for vision restoration at high spatiotemporal resolution. BME. Front. 2022, 2022, 9829316.

185. Lu, G.; Gong, C.; Sun, Y.; et al. Noninvasive imaging-guided ultrasonic neurostimulation with arbitrary 2D patterns and its application for high-quality vision restoration. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 4481.

186. Yüksel, M. B.; Koyuncuoğlu, A.; Külah, H. Thin-film PZT-based multi-channel acoustic MEMS transducer for cochlear implant applications. IEEE. Sens. J. 2022, 22, 3052-60.

187. Uluşan, H.; Yüksel, M. B.; Topçu, Ö.; et al. A full-custom fully implantable cochlear implant system validated in vivo with an animal model. Commun. Eng. 2024, 3, 132.

188. Chang, J.; Maltby, T.; Moineddini, A.; et al. Piezoelectric nanofiber-based intelligent hearing system. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadl2741.

189. Lu, G.; Qian, X.; Gong, C.; et al. Ultrasound retinal stimulation: a mini-review of recent developments. IEEE. Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2022, 69, 3224-31.

190. Yüksel, M. B.; Atik, A. C.; Külah, H. Piezoelectric multi-channel bilayer transducer for sensing and filtering ossicular vibration. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2308277.

191. Ji, J.; Gong, C.; Lu, G.; et al. Potential of ultrasound stimulation and sonogenetics in vision restoration: a narrative review. Neural. Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 3501-16.

192. Kitsopoulos, P.; Grosh, K. Design of multi-bandwidth piezoelectric microelectromechanical systems accelerometers for totally implantable auditory prostheses: how many bandwidths are enough? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2025, 157, 4385-96.

193. Kumar, M.; Singh, R.; Kang, H.; Kim, S.; Seo, H. An artificial piezotronic synapse for tactile perception. Nano. Energy. 2020, 73, 104756.

194. Zhang, X.; Zhuo, Y.; Luo, Q.; et al. An artificial spiking afferent nerve based on Mott memristors for neurorobotics. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 51.

195. Birkoben, T.; Winterfeld, H.; Fichtner, S.; Petraru, A.; Kohlstedt, H. A spiking and adapting tactile sensor for neuromorphic applications. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17260.

196. Waseem, A.; Abdullah, A.; Bagal, I. V.; Ha, J. S.; Lee, J. K.; Ryu, S. W. Self-powered and flexible piezo-sensors based on conductivity-controlled GaN nanowire-arrays for mimicking rapid- and slow-adapting mechanoreceptors. NPJ. Flex. Electron. 2022, 6, 58.

197. Wang, X.; Ling, X.; Hu, Y.; et al. Electronic skin based on PLLA/TFT/PVDF-TrFE array for multi-functional tactile sensing and visualized restoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 434, 134735.

198. Li, H.; Lin, J.; Lin, S.; et al. A bioinspired tactile scanner for computer haptics. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7632.

199. Jiang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Kwon, S. H.; Dong, L. Self-powered, soft and breathable human-machine interface based on piezoelectric sensors. Adv. Sens. Res. 2024, 3, 2400086.

200. Wang, F.; Yang, P.; Liu, W.; et al. Simultaneous visualization of dynamical and static tactile perception using piezoelectric-ultrasonic bimodal electronic skin based on in situ polarized PVDF-TrFE/2DBP composites and the TFT array. ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2025, 17, 16057-71.

201. Valle, G.; Katic Secerovic, N.; Eggemann, D.; et al. Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 1151.

202. Soghoyan, G.; Biktimirov, A.; Matvienko, Y.; Chekh, I.; Sintsov, M.; Lebedev, M. A. Peripheral nerve stimulation enables somatosensory feedback while suppressing phantom limb pain in transradial amputees. Brain. Stimul. 2023, 16, 756-8.

203. Ulery, B. D.; Nair, L. S.; Laurencin, C. T. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polymers. J. Polym. Sci. B. Polym. Phys. 2011, 49, 832-64.

204. Li, X.; Wang, Z. L.; Wei, D. Iontronic logic control driven by dynamic electrical double layer regulation. Iontronics 2025, 1, 2.

205. Nisar, S.; Dastgeer, G.; Shazad, Z. M.; et al. 2D materials in advanced electronic biosensors for point-of-care devices. Adv. Sci. 2024, 11, e2401386.

Energy Materials
ISSN 2770-5900 (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/