REFERENCES

1. Friedlingstein, P.; O’sullivan, M.; Jones, M. W.; et al. Global carbon budget 2024. Earth. Syst. Sci. Data. 2025, 17, 965-1039.

2. Grim, R. G.; Badgett, A.; Braunecker, W. A.; et al. The chemistry of CO₂ conversion: a review. Chem. Rev. 2026, 126, 5028-82.

3. Garg, S.; Xie, Z.; Chen, J. G. Tandem reactors and reactions for CO₂ conversion. Nat. Chem. Eng. 2024, 1, 139-48.

4. Yu, S.; Yamauchi, H.; Wang, S.; et al. CO₂-to-methanol electroconversion on a molecular cobalt catalyst facilitated by acidic cations. Nat. Catal. 2024, 7, 1000-9.

5. Chen, H.; Xiong, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Epitaxially grown silicon-based single-atom catalyst for visible-light-driven syngas production. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 1719.

6. Zhou, W.; Wang, X.; Zhao, W.; et al. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction to syngas using metallosalen covalent organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 6971.

7. Xie, Z.; Xu, S.; Li, L.; et al. Well-defined diatomic catalysis for photosynthesis of C₂H₄ from CO₂. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 2422.

8. Weber, J. L.; Mejía, C. H.; de Jong, K. P.; de Jongh, P. E. Recent advances in bifunctional synthesis gas conversion to chemicals and fuels with a comparison to monofunctional processes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2024, 14, 4799-842.

9. Hou, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wei, K.; et al. Syngas production from CO₂ and H₂O via solid-oxide electrolyzer cells: fundamentals, materials, degradation, operating conditions, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2024, 124, 5119-66.

10. Dossow, M.; Klüh, D.; Umeki, K.; Gaderer, M.; Spliethoff, H.; Fendt, S. Electrification of gasification-based biomass-to-X processes - a critical review and in-depth assessment. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 925-73.

11. Zhang, Y.; He, T.; Chen, J.; et al. Recent progress in and future perspectives on high-density single-atom electrocatalysts. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2025, 8, 257.

12. Xu, C.; Wu, N.; Ran, Y.; Hong, P.; Lei, Y. Two-in-one integrated CO₂/N₂ conversion and related systems: potential, status, and future. Electrochem. Energy. Rev. 2025, 8, 264.

13. Fang, S.; Rahaman, M.; Bharti, J.; et al. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Nat. Rev. Methods. Primers. 2023, 3, 243.

14. He, H.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, L.; et al. Synergistic modulation of charge dynamics and mass transfer optimization via heterogeneous interface engineering in photothermal catalytic CO₂ reduction within continuous flow systems. Nano. Energy. 2025, 142, 111290.

15. Choi, S. H.; Song, I.; Dong, W. J. Recent progress of photothermal catalysts for carbon dioxide conversion. Energy. Mater. 2025, 5, 500062.

16. Ray, D.; Nepak, D.; Vinodkumar, T.; Subrahmanyam, C. g-C₃N₄ promoted DBD plasma assisted dry reforming of methane. Energy 2019, 183, 630-8.

17. Gonzalez-Casamachin, D. A.; Hu, Y.; Rangarajan, S.; Baltrusaitis, J. Mechanistic insights for plasma-catalytic CO₂ reduction over TiO₂ in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor. ACS. Eng. Au. 2026, 6, 334-44.

18. Yang, Y.; Murphy, A. B. CO₂ conversion using non-thermal plasmas: the path towards industrialisation. Curr. Opin. Green. Sustain. Chem. 2025, 51, 100994.

19. Huang, Q.; Fu, C.; Shen, Y.; et al. Boosting CO₂ conversion by synergy of lead-free perovskite Cs₂SnCl₆ and plasma with H₂O. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2023, 14, 8922-9.

20. Feng, X.; Cao, L.; Fu, C.; et al. Enhanced CO₂ conversion in dielectric barrier discharge plasma coupled with a heterojunction photocatalyst. Chem. Commun. 2024, 60, 8900-3.

21. Bi, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; et al. Plasma-coupled photocatalytic CO₂/H₂O conversion to tunable syngas over Cu_xPd_y/TiO₂ with electronic modulation. Appl. Catal. B. Environ. Energy. 2027, 402, 127470.

22. Wanten, B.; Vertongen, R.; De Meyer, R.; Bogaerts, A. Plasma-based CO₂ conversion: how to correctly analyze the performance? J. Energy. Chem. 2023, 86, 180-96.

23. Shen, Y.; Fu, C.; Luo, W.; Liang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Q. Machine learning for CO₂ conversion driven by dielectric barrier discharge plasma and Cs₂TeCl₆ photocatalysts. Green. Chem. 2023, 25, 7605-11.

24. Cai, Y.; Bai, Z.; Chen, C.; et al. Machine learning prediction of small molecule passivators and their impacts on the passivation and photocatalytic performance of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite interfaces. Energy. Mater. 2025, 5, 500043.

25. Han, N.; Su, B. L. AI-driven material discovery for energy, catalysis and sustainability. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2025, 12, nwaf110.

26. Luo, W.; Shen, Y.; Fu, C.; Feng, X.; Huang, Q. Exploring the CO₂ conversion activated by the dielectric barrier discharge plasma assisted with photocatalyst via machine learning. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 114428.

27. Taniike, T.; Fujiwara, A.; Nakanowatari, S.; García-Escobar, F.; Takahashi, K. Automatic feature engineering for catalyst design using small data without prior knowledge of target catalysis. Commun. Chem. 2024, 7, 11.

28. Li, J.; Xu, J.; Rebrov, E.; Bogaerts, A. Machine learning-based prediction and optimization of plasma-catalytic dry reforming of methane in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 507, 159897.

29. Hu, Y.; Sandt, R.; Spatschek, R. Practical feature filter strategy to machine learning for small datasets in chemistry. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20449.

30. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Statist. 2001, 29, 1189-232.

31. Rupp, M.; Tkatchenko, A.; Müller, K. R.; von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 108, 058301.

32. van der Laan, M. J.; Polley, E. C.; Hubbard, A. E. Super learner. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2007, 6, 25.

33. Chicco, D.; Warrens, M. J.; Jurman, G. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ. Comput. Sci. 2021, 7, e623.

34. Williamson, B. D.; Gilbert, P. B.; Simon, N. R.; Carone, M. A general framework for inference on algorithm-agnostic variable importance. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2023, 118, 1645-58.

35. Fumagalli, F.; Muschalik, M.; Hüllermeier, E.; Hammer, B. Incremental permutation feature importance (iPFI): towards online explanations on data streams. Mach. Learn. 2023, 112, 4863-903.

36. Altmann, A.; Toloşi, L.; Sander, O.; Lengauer, T. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1340-7.

37. Bilodeau, B.; Jaques, N.; Koh, P. W.; Kim, B. Impossibility theorems for feature attribution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2024, 121, e2304406120.

38. Štrumbelj, E.; Kononenko, I. Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2014, 41, 647-65.

39. Lundberg, S. M.; Erion, G.; Chen, H.; et al. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2020, 2, 56-67.

40. Gao, B.; Feng, Y.; Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Fang, Y.; Cao, G. Defect-engineered Ru-Co/TiO_2-x catalysts for highly efficient plasma-catalytic ammonia synthesis under ambient conditions. Green. Chem. 2026, 28, 8235-48.

41. Huang, Z.; Sun, S.; Ma, M.; et al. Facile synthesis of TiO₂ supported Pd nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic CO₂ reduction to CH₄ with H₂O. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2025, 43, e01247.

42. Liu, S.; Meng, Y.; Luo, C.; et al. Green hydrogen and acetaldehyde production via photo-induced thermal dehydrogenation of bioethanol over a highly dispersed CuS/TiO₂ catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen. Energy. 2024, 86, 1414-23.

43. Liang, J.; Tian, F.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhang, H. Single-atom Cu anchored phosphorus-doped graphitic carbon nitride for selective photocatalytic CO₂ reduction. Environ. Res. 2025, 285, 122324.

44. Huang, Q.; Fu, C.; Liang, Z.; et al. CO₂ conversion synergistically driven by radiofrequency inductively-coupled plasma and lead-free halide perovskite photocatalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2023, 127, 11550-8.

45. Han, Y.; Fan, G.; Guo, Y.; et al. Plasma-Driven Efficient conversion of CO₂ and H₂O into pure syngas with controllable wide H₂/CO ratios over metal-organic frameworks featuring in situ evolved ligand defects. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202406007.

46. Haghshenas, Y.; Wong, W. P.; Gunawan, D.; et al. Predicting the rates of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over cocatalyst-deposited TiO₂ using machine learning with active photon flux as a unifying feature. EES. Catal. 2024, 2, 612-23.

47. Wu, X.; Shen, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C. Dielectric surface engineering via TiO₂ coating for enhanced plasma-driven efficient CO₂ decomposition. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 505, 159743.

48. Trampel, C. P.; Stieler, D. S. Control of electromagnetic edge effects in electrically-small rectangular plasma reactors. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A. 2012, 30, 051305.

49. Vertongen, R.; Bogaerts, A. How important is reactor design for CO₂ conversion in warm plasmas? J. CO2. Util. 2023, 72, 102510.

50. Deo, J. V.; Madhukar, A. Study of electric field distribution on plasma and plasma catalysis reactor for different electrode configurations and pellet sizes. PPT 2024, 11, 54-60.

51. Lisi, N.; Pasqual Laverdura, U.; Chierchia, R.; Luisetto, I.; Stendardo, S. A water cooled, high power, dielectric barrier discharge reactor for CO₂ plasma dissociation and valorization studies. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 7394.

52. Liang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, L.; Lam, Y. M. Thermodynamic and microkinetic insights into potential-dependent competition between CO₂ reduction and HER on Mo₂CT_x MXene. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 520, 165927.

53. Chawdhury, P.; Chansai, S.; Conway, M.; et al. Enhancing the reaction of CO₂ and H₂O using catalysts within a nonthermal plasma. ACS. Catal. 2025, 15, 7053-65.

54. Klein, M.; Jack, J. Non-thermal plasma upgrading of humidified CO₂ into syngas in a dielectric barrier discharge reactor: tuning H₂/CO ratios via specific energy input and gas flow rate. Energy. Adv. 2026, 5, 354-64.

55. Snoeckx, R.; Ozkan, A.; Reniers, F.; Bogaerts, A. The quest for value-added products from carbon dioxide and water in a dielectric barrier discharge: a chemical kinetics study. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 409-24.

56. Behroozi, A. H.; Xu, R. Photocatalytic CO₂ reduction: photocatalysts, membrane reactors, and hybrid processes. Chem. Catal. 2023, 3, 100550.

57. Alamdari, A.; Azarhoosh, M. J.; Aghaeinejad-Meybodi, A. Thermodynamic assessment of tri-reforming of methane with optimization of operating conditions to achieve suitable syngas for methanol production. Sci. Rep. 2026, 16, 14257.

58. Bonde, A.; Jakobsen, J. B.; Ahrens, A.; et al. Integrating hydroformylations with methanol-to-syngas reforming. Chem 2025, 11, 102396.

59. Yoshizawa, T.; Ishida, S.; Sato, T.; Ohta, M.; Honma, T.; Terayama, K. A data-driven generative strategy to avoid reward hacking in multi-objective molecular design. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2409.

60. Janet, J. P.; Duan, C.; Yang, T.; Nandy, A.; Kulik, H. J. A quantitative uncertainty metric controls error in neural network-driven chemical discovery. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 7913-22.

61. Haddadnia, M.; Grashoff, L.; Strieth-Kalthoff, F. BoTier: multi-objective Bayesian optimization with tiered objective structures. Digit. Discov. 2025, 4, 1417-22.

62. Frömbgen, T.; Surzhikova, E.; Dölz, J.; Proppe, J.; Kirchner, B.; Jacob, C. R. Uncertainty quantification for in silico chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2026, 126, 4189-236.