Recent advances in Sb-based anodes for Li/Na/K-ion batteries and all-solid-state Li-ion batteries
Abstract
In recent decades, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have emerged as a primary focus in the energy-storage field owing to their superior energy and power densities. However, concerns regarding the depletion of non-abundant lithium resources have prompted the exploration and development of emerging energy-storage technologies, such as sodium- (SIBs) and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). In addition, all-solid-state LIBs (ASSLIBs) have been developed to address the issues of flammability and explosiveness associated with liquid electrolytes. Among the various alloy-based anodes, antimony (Sb) anodes exhibit high energy densities owing to their high theoretical volumetric capacities that are attributable to their high densities. However, Sb anodes exhibit poor cyclabilities owing to excessive volume changes during cycling. To mitigate this issue, researchers have investigated the use of diverse solutions, including solid electrolyte interface control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation. Herein, we review and summarize Sb-based anode materials for LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs developed over the past five years (2018-present), focusing on their reaction mechanisms and multiple approaches used to achieve optimal electrochemical performance. We anticipate that this review will provide a comprehensive database of Sb-based anodes for LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs, thereby advancing relevant studies in the energy-storage-systems field.
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
The increasing demand for sustainable energy storage has driven research into high-performance battery technologies[1-5]. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) currently dominate the secondary battery market but are anticipated to face limitations in the near future owing to unevenly distributed Li reserves and the depletion of Li resources. To address these concerns, new energy storage system (ESS) technologies, such as sodium- (SIBs)[6-10] and potassium-ion batteries (PIBs)[10-16], have emerged as secondary battery systems that utilize Na and K as charge carriers. Because Na and K belong to the same elemental group as Li, they undergo electrochemical reactions similar to Li (-3.04 vs. Li+/Li). Consequently, they offer advantages in terms of adoption in LIB systems, including electrode material selection and analytical methods. Additionally, Na and K are abundantly available, inexpensive, and have standard electrode potentials similar to Li
Enhancing high-performance anode materials remains a critical challenge. Carbonaceous anode materials (mainly graphite) have long been used in LIBs owing to their cycling stabilities and low costs[17]. However, high-performance anodes need to overcome the inherent limitations of the low theoretical capacities and sluggish rate capabilities of carbonaceous anode materials. Similarly, high-performance anode materials for SIBs and PIBs are also urgently needed[22-24]. Hard carbon is the preferred SIB anode material because the interlayer spacing of graphite is too narrow to accommodate Na ions. However, hard carbon has a limited reversible capacity with a poor initial Coulombic efficiency (ICE). Although various carbonaceous anode materials can be used in PIBs, they exhibit low reversible capacities (279 mAh g-1, KC8). Similarly, during the initial stages of ASSLIB research, a solid electrolyte with a high mechanical strength physically inhibited the growth of Li dendrites, thereby facilitating the direct utilization of lithium metal. However, recent studies have found that the direct use of lithium metal results in self-destructive properties[19,20] that also promote the decomposition of the solid electrolyte at the interface, leading to the growth of Li dendrites. Furthermore, graphite anodes also accelerate solid-electrolyte deterioration due to their low reaction potentials (0-0.2 V vs. Li+/Li) and high electrical conductivities (~103 S/m)[25,26]. Therefore, research into high-performance anode materials applicable to LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs with high capacities, long-term cycling stabilities, fast rate capabilities, and that do not form dendrites is required.
Antimony (Sb) is a promising alternative high-performance next-generation anode material candidate that simultaneously meets the aforementioned requirements for LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs. Figure 1 shows that an Sb anode exhibits the same high theoretical capacity of 660 mAh g-1 [Table 1 and Figure 1A] in alkali metal-ion batteries (AIBs)[9-16,27-39]. In particular, the Sb anode offers a high theoretical volumetric capacity (Table 1 and Figure 1B, 4,420 mA h cm-3)[27-31], which is attributable to the high density of Sb (6.70 g cm-3 at ambient temperature). Although the theoretical capacity of Sb is high, Sb anodes are poorly cyclable owing to excessive volume change experienced during cycling (Table 1 and Figure 1C; Li3Sb: 134%, Na3Sb: 291%, and K3Sb: 406%). To address the issue of Sb anodes, researchers have explored various strategies based on a comprehensive understanding of their electrochemical reaction mechanisms in AIBs and ASSLIBs. Among numerous studies and strategies, this review focuses on three main strategies for improving the performance of Sb-based anodes. First, solid electrolyte interface (SEI) layer control is a strategy for optimizing the construction and composition of the SEI layer that develops on the electrode surface during cell operation. An ideal SEI layer is chemically stable, ion-conductive, and inhibits excessive electrolyte decomposition, thereby enhancing cycling stability[40,41]. Second, structural control strategy involves tailoring the morphology and nanostructure of the Sb material. Techniques such as creating porous structures, nanoparticles, or nanowires can improve the electrolyte accessibility to the active material and accommodate volume change during the electrochemical reaction, thereby improving the rate capability and reducing capacity degradation[42-44]. Third, composite/alloy formation strategy provides high battery performance by incorporating other elements that can improve the electrical conductivity of Sb anodes and enhance their mechanical stability by suppressing volume change[45-54]. Other improvement strategies, including using protective layers[55,56] and highly conductive additives[57,58], are also available. Unfortunately, the abovementioned improvements only provide temporary performance enhancements, and their abuse can result in undesirable side reactions that degrade performance. On the other hand, binder optimization undeniably improves performance by enhancing the mechanical strength of the active material and its adhesion to the current collector[59]. However, the binder does not directly participate in electrochemical reactions; therefore, the three key-point strategies discussed above are directly related to the electrochemical reaction and significantly affect performance improvement. This review presents recent breakthroughs in Sb-based anodes for AIBs and ASSLIBs reported over the past five years (2018-2023).
Figure 1. Comparing various anode materials (graphite (C), Si, Sn, and Sb) for LIBs, SIBs, and PIBs. (A) Theoretical gravimetric capacities. (B) Theoretical volumetric capacities. (C) Volume changes during electrochemical reactions. Parameter values were calculated for theoretically fully discharged phases (C: LiC6, NaC64, KC8; Si: Li4.4Si, NaSi, KSi; Sn: Li4.4Sn, Na3.75Sn, KSn; Sb: Li3Sb, Na3Sb, K3Sb).
Electrochemical properties of graphite, Si, Sn, and Sb anodes for LIBs, SIBs, and PIBs
Anode material | Theoretically fully discharged phase | Density (g cm-3) | Molar mass (g mol-1) | Molar volume (cm3 mol-1) | Theoretical capacity | Volume change (%) | |
gravimetric (mAh g-1) | volumetric (mAh cm-3) | ||||||
Graphite (C) | LiC6 | 2.20 | 79.0 | 36 | 372 | 841 | 12.1 |
NaC64 | 1.85 | 791.6 | 428 | 35 | 79 | 25.8 | |
KC8 | 1.95 | 135.2 | 69 | 279 | 631 | 63.1 | |
Silicon (Si) | Li4.4Si | 1.18 | 58.6 | 50 | 4,199 | 9,786 | 312.1 |
NaSi | 1.76 | 51.1 | 29 | 954 | 2,223 | 140.8 | |
KSi | 1.76 | 67.2 | 38 | 954 | 2,223 | 216.7 | |
Tin (Sn) | Li4.4Sn | 1.92 | 149.2 | 78 | 993 | 7,259 | 378.7 |
Na3.75Sn | 2.38 | 204.9 | 86 | 847 | 6,192 | 430.2 | |
KSn | 3.46 | 157.8 | 46 | 226 | 1,652 | 180.8 | |
Antimony (Sb) | Li3Sb | 3.35 | 142.6 | 43 | 660 | 4,420 | 134.1 |
Na3Sb | 2.69 | 190.7 | 71 | 660 | 4,420 | 290.7 | |
K3Sb | 2.60 | 239.1 | 92 | 660 | 4,420 | 405.7 |
REACTION MECHANISM
Sb anodes undergo alloying/dealloying with alkali metal ions, especially Li+, Na+, and K+, to form Li3Sb, Na3Sb, and K3Sb during charging and discharging. In addition, Sb has a unique puckered structure, and its interlayer space effectively accommodates the insertion of alkali metal ions. The reported electrochemical reaction mechanism of the Sb anode during discharging and charging in each system (LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs) is summarized below.
Sb-anode reaction mechanism in LIBs
Various studies have examined the electrochemical reaction mechanisms associated with Sb anodes in LIBs[60-62]. Park et al. demonstrated the reaction mechanism of an Sb anode using ex-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD)[60]. During discharging (lithiation), rhombohedral Sb alloys with Li form an intermediate crystalline hexagonal Li2Sb phase and then transform into a fully discharged cubic Li3Sb phase. In contrast, during charging (delithiation), cubic Li3Sb is directly converted into rhombohedral Sb without involving an intermediate phase. Shin et al. demonstrated the same electrochemical reaction mechanism using in-situ time-domain thermoreflectance analysis[61]. The asymmetric behavior of the Sb anode during discharging and charging was also elucidated by Chang et al. using first-principles calculations and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy[62]. These researchers insisted that the higher nucleation driving force associated with Sb results in a single-step reaction pathway in which Li3Sb is directly recovered to Sb without forming a thermodynamically stable Li2Sb intermediate phase during the charging process. Therefore, the suggested reaction mechanism for the Sb anode in LIBs during discharging/charging is summarized by equations (1) and (2), along with the crystallographic schematic shown in Figure 2.
During discharging:
During charging
Sb-anode reaction mechanism in SIBs
The Sb anode in SIBs exhibits a symmetric reaction mechanism during discharging (sodiation) and charging (desodiation), unlike the behavior observed in LIBs[63-67]. Darwiche et al. reported that rhombohedral Sb alloyed with Na forms an amorphous intermediate NaxSb (x < 3) phase during the discharge reaction[63] owing to the sluggish kinetics associated with the crystallization of NaSb into the monoclinic structure. Subsequently, amorphous NaxSb is transformed into hexagonal Na3Sb. Conversely, during charging, Na3Sb is transformed back into amorphous NaxSb, which is recovered as rhombohedral Sb. Although XRD clearly identified Na3Sb, the NaxSb phase was not detected owing to its amorphous nature. Recent first-principles calculations performed by Caputo and Yu et al. demonstrated that the NaxSb phase corresponds to monoclinic NaSb, which is the most thermodynamically stable phase[64,65]. This theoretical prediction was further supported by the experimental results, which are demonstrated using extended X-ray absorption fine structure analysis by Yu et al., and in-situ XRD by Tian et al.[66,67]. Therefore, the suggested reaction mechanism for the Sb anode in SIBs during discharging/charging is summarized by equations (3) and (4), along with the crystallographic schematic shown in Figure 3.
During discharging:
During charging:
Sb-anode reaction mechanism in PIBs
Several studies have reported the K-ion reaction pathway for an Sb anode in PIBs during discharging (potassiation) and charging (depotassiation)[68-70]. The Sb reaction mechanism was investigated by
During discharging:
During charging:
RECENT ADVANCES IN ANTIMONY-BASED ANODES
Owing to its high theoretical gravimetric and volumetric capacities, Sb exhibits significant potential as an anode material for LIBs, SIBs, and PIBs [Figure 1A and B]. However, the alloying reaction with Li induces substantial volume changes and internal stresses in the Sb particles [Figure 1C], which leads to pulverization. Consequently, pulverized Sb particles inevitably form an additional SEI layer through further reactions with the electrolyte during repeated cycling, resulting in irreversible side reactions[55,71]. Therefore, researchers have proposed various strategies to address the challenges associated with excessive volume changes, including SEI layer control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation, to achieve highly stable cycling and rate capabilities [Figure 5]. This section systematically presents recent research progress focused on overcoming such drawbacks from the perspectives of SEI layer control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation.
Figure 5. Schematic showing various strategies employed to engineer Sb anodes for LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs.
Sb-based anodes for LIBs
Sb is considered a competitive anode owing to its abundance, metallic properties, high theoretical capacity (Li3Sb: 660 mAh g-1), and moderate potential (0.5-0.8 V vs. Li+/Li). However, Sb-based anodes undergo excessive volume changes (~134%), and the continuous formation and destruction of the SEI layer result in capacity degradation and electrolyte starvation. To address these issues, recent advances in SEI layer control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation of Sb-based anode for LIB applications have been reported.
Researchers have explored the use of various solvents and salts to improve the SEI layer properties of Sb-based anodes[72-74]. Bian et al. reported incorporating fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC) into a propylene carbonate (PC) electrolyte in the LIB system[72]. This approach facilitates the construction of a stable SEI layer on a microsized Sb anode during Li cycling [Figure 6A]. Analysis using first-principles calculations,
Figure 6. (A) Schematic illustration and rate capabilities of microsized Sb using FEC additives[72]. (B) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of bulk Sb using LiFSI-based electrolytes[73]. (C) Schematic illustration, rate capabilities, and cyclabilities of a pristine Sb anode using LiNO3 additives[74]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Bian et al.[72], Sun et al.[73], and Cai et al.[74].
Porous and multidimensional structural materials with high surface areas have been proposed as high-performance Sb-based anodes for LIBs[75-77]. These structured Sb anodes effectively accommodate volume changes during cycling. Liu et al. synthesized spherical Sb/C composites to address volume change during the charge/discharge process [Figure 7A][75]. The mesoporous Sb/C structure provided more Li-active sites and faster kinetics, which were attributed to the higher surface area that effectively accommodated volume changes due to the buffer effect. Consequently, the spherical Sb/C composite anode exhibited an impressive ICE of 86.7% and maintained a reversible capacity of 590 mAh g-1 after 80 cycles at a current rate of
Figure 7. (A) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of spherical Sb/C composite anodes[75]. (B) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of Sb/CNT composite film anodes[76]. (C) Schematic illustration and rate capabilities of a nanorod-in-nanotube-structured Sb/N-C anode[77]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Liu et al.[75], Schulze et al.[76], and Luo et al.[77].
To achieve high-performance Sb-based anodes for LIBs, various strategies involving Sb-based alloys and carbon composites have been proposed for use as high-performance Sb-based anodes in LIBs[78-88].
Figure 8. (A) Schematic illustration and cyclability of an Sb/C nanosheet anode[78]. (B) Schematic illustration and cyclability of a NiSb/N-C nanosheet anode[79]. (C) Schematic illustration and rate capability of an Sb/CTHN anode[80]. (D) Schematic illustration and rate capability of a CS/NPC anode[81]. (E) Schematic illustration and rate capability of a ZnSnSb2 anode[82]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Zhang et al.[78], Pan et al.[79], Yu et al.[80], Yang et al.[81], and Coquil et al.[82].
Li-storage properties of Sb-based LIB anodes
Material | Electrolyte | Binder | ICE (%) | Cyclability after the Xth cycle (mAh g-1) | Rate capability | Ref. | ||
Salt | Solvent | Current rate (A g-1) | Reversible capacity (mAh g-1) | |||||
Micro-sized Sb | 1.0 M LiPF6 | PC with 10 vol% FEC | CMC | 81.0 | 540 (X = 150) | 5.0 | 575 | [72] |
Bulk Sb | 1.2 M LiFSI | TEP:HFE = 1:3 mol% | PAA/CMC | 87.5 | 648 (X = 50) | 0.5 | 604 | [73] |
Pristine Sb | 3.0 M LiFSI + 0.4 M LiNO3 | DOL:DME = 1:1 vol% | PAA/CMC | 82.5 | 624 (X = 100) | 3.3 | 487 | [74] |
Spherical Sb/C | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | Alginate | 86.7 | 590 (X = 80) | 1.2 | 535 | [75] |
Sb/CNT composite film | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DEC = 3:7 vol% | Binder-free | 78.7 | 340 (X = 100) | 3.2 | 300 | [76] |
Nanorod-in-nanotube Sb/N-C | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC:EMC = 1:1:1 vol% with 10 wt% FEC | CMC | 78.3 | 346 (X = 3,000) | 20.0 | 343 | [77] |
Sb/carbon nanosheets | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% | PVDF | 62.5 | 598 (X = 100) | 2.0 | 449 | [78] |
NiSb/N-C nanosheets | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% | PTFE | 71.8 | 401 (X = 1,000) | 5.0 | 252 | [79] |
Sb/CTHNs | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | PVDF | 52.4 | 607 (X = 100) | 5.0 | 435 | [80] |
CS/NPC | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DEC:DMC = 1:1:1 vol% | CMC | 52 | 833 (X = 3,000) | 10.0 | 343 | [81] |
ZnSnSb2 | 1.0 M LiPF6 | PC:EC:DMC = 1:1:3 vol% with 5 vol% FEC + 1 vol% VC | CMC | 83.0 | 615 (X = 200) | 0.63 | 650 | [82] |
NiSb/C | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | Alginate | 68.5 | 500 (X = 200) | 2.0 | 426 | [83] |
NiSb/C nanosheets | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | PVDF | 64.1 | 405 (X = 1,000) | 2.0 | 305 | [84] |
Sb/rGO | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% | PVDF | 52.3 | 798 (X = 200) | 0.43 | 563 | [85] |
silica-reinforce Sb/CNF | 1.0 M LiPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% | PAA | 66.4 | 700 (X = 400) | 1.0 | 468 | [86] |
Sb-based SIB anodes
Sb has been extensively researched as a high energy density SIB anode material due to its high Na-storage capacity (Na3Sb: 660 mAh g-1) and appropriate operating voltage (0.3-0.7 V vs. Na+/Na). However, Sb anodes exhibit drawbacks similar to those of LIBs, including the formation of unstable SEI layers, significant volume changes (~291%), and sluggish charge transfer during discharging and charging, resulting in poor cycling stability. To address these issues, recent advances in SEI layer control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation have been proposed for Sb-based anodes for SIBs.
Electrolyte additives significantly affect the formation of a stable SEI layer, which is closely related to the electrochemical performance of the Sb anode[72,89,90]. Lu et al. investigated the surface structure, composition, and electrochemical performance of Sb-based anodes (SiC-Sb-C) in FEC-free and FEC-containing electrolytes using XPS, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), EIS, and electrochemical characterization techniques [Figure 9A][89]. Carbonate solvents (EC and DEC) gradually decompose on the SiC-Sb-C particle surface in the FEC-free electrolyte to form an SEI layer composed of Na2CO3, ROCO2Na, and RONa units. The precipitate layers formed from these salts are generally loose, forming thick SEI layers. FEC-containing electrolyte is more reactive than EC or DEC-containing electrolyte; it decomposes first on the particle surface to form a dense and thin SEI layer composed of fluorine (F)-containing salts, such as NaF, F-ROCO2Na, and F-RONa. Although a F-containing SEI film can inhibit the decomposition of EC and DEC to a certain extent, EC and DEC still decompose along with FEC at low potentials
Figure 9. (A) Schematic illustration of the SEI layer formation mechanism and the cyclabilities of Sb-based anodes in FEC-free and FEC-containing electrolytes[89]. (B) Schematic illustration, cyclabilities, and rate capabilities associated with morphological changes experienced by micro-sized Sb anodes in FEC-free and 10 vol% FEC-containing electrolytes[72]. (C) XPS results and cyclabilities of
Nanostructural design and low-dimensional engineering aimed at accelerating reaction kinetics are considered the most efficient strategies for addressing the abovementioned drawbacks, including the sluggish rate capability and rapid capacity decay associated with the excessive volume change experienced by Sb[67,91-96]. Liu et al. fabricated highly uniform Sb nanotubes (NTs) using a galvanic replacement approach using a Cu2Sb-mediated formation mechanism[91]. The Sb NT anode delivered a reversible capacity of 546 mAh g-1 after 100 cycles with a capacity retention of 98.7% at 0.1 A g-1 and excellent long-term cycling stability at 1.0 A g-1 (342 mAh g-1 after 6,000 cycles with a capacity retention of 74%) [Figure 10A]. The excellent Na-storage performance of the Sb NTs was attributed to the one-dimensional hollow structure, which effectively relieves structural deformation and shortens the ion-diffusion path, thereby improving the Na-ion diffusion kinetics. Tian et al. synthesized two-dimensional few-layer antimonene (2D FLA) nanosheets via liquid-phase exfoliation of β-antimony in a 1:1 mixture of N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) and ethanol[67]. The 2D FLA anode maintained a stable capacity of 620 mAh g-1 after 150 cycles at 0.5 C
Figure 10. (A) TEM images of Cu nanowires as sacrificial templates and the performance of Sb NTs synthesized by galvanic replacement[91]. (B) Schematic illustration and atomic structure of 2D few-layer antimonene, and the cyclability of a 2D few-layer antimonene anode[67]. (C) Schematic illustration, cyclabilities, and rate capabilities of a full cell with a yolk-shell Sb/graphdiyne nanobox anode[92]. (D) Schematic illustration of the fabrication of a 3D porous Sb/C anode and its rate capabilities[93]. (E) Schematic illustration and cyclability of a yolk-shell Sb/NS-3DPCMSs anode[94]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Tian et al.[67],
Sb-based alloys and carbon composites have also been proposed in the SIB system to achieve high performance by effectively mitigating the significant volume changes experienced by Sb during sodiation/desodiation[97-104]. Ma et al. synthesized an ultrafine mesoporous Sb2O3@Sb nanocomposite using a one-step dealloying reaction and a two-phase Mg-Sb precursor[97]. The mesoporous Sb2O3@Sb anode exhibited a high specific capacity of 659 mAh g-1 in the second cycle, long-term cycling stability (a capacity retention of 99.8% after 200 cycles at 0.2 A g-1), and an excellent rate capability (200 mAh g-1 at 29.7 A g-1) [Figure 11A]. Xie et al. developed an Sb@NGA-CMP composite comprising ultrafine Sb nanoparticles uniformly anchored in the pores of a covalent organic framework (COF) using an in-situ synthetic strategy[98]. To facilitate COF formation, Sb3+ was introduced as a catalyst and subsequently immobilized in the COF channels through reduction. This unique architecture provided electronic interactions between Sb nanoparticles and π-conjugated microporous polymers (CMPs) through nitrogen groups, thereby accelerating charge transfer along the COF. The Sb@NGA-CMP composite anode exhibited a high rate capability of 223 mAh g-1 at 2 A g-1, and 188 mAh g-1 at 5 A g-1, and excellent Na storage performance of
Figure 11. (A) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process, cyclability, and rate capability of a mesoporous Sb2O3@Sb nanocomposite anode[97]. (B) Schematic illustration of the fabrication process and rate capability of an Sb@NGA-CMP composite anode[98]. (C) Schematic illustration, XRD patterns, cyclability, and rate capability of an electrodeposited Sb/NiSb composite anode[99]. (D) Schematic illustration of the one-step dealloying process used to prepare the NP-SnSb alloy anode, along with its cyclability and rate capability[100]. (E) Structure and cyclability of a ligament-channel np-Bi-Sb alloys anode[101]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Ma et al.[97], Xie et al.[98], Zheng et al.[99], Ma et al.[100], and Gao et al.[101].
Na-storage properties of Sb-based anodes for SIBs
Material | Electrolyte | Binder | ICE (%) | Cyclability after the Xth cycle (mAh g-1) | Rate capability | Ref. | ||
Salt | Solvent | Current rate (A g-1) | Reversible capacity (mAh g-1) | |||||
Sb nanotubes | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | CMC | 71.0 | 342 (X = 6,000) | 0.1 | 546 | [91] |
Few-layer antimonene | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | CMC | 64.7 | 620 (X = 150) | 0.33 | 400 | [67] |
Spherical Sb/C | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:PC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | Alginate | 66.9 | 502 (X = 150) | 1.2 | 340 | [75] |
Sb/graphdiyne nanobox | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | CMC | 45.6 | 325 (X = 8,000) | 10.0 | 294 | [92] |
3D porous Sb/C | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 5 wt% FEC | PVDF | 38.0 | 461 (X = 200) | 5.0 | 349 | [93] |
Yolk-shell Sb/NS-3DPCMSs | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 5 wt% FEC | CMC | 48.1 | 540 (X = 150) | 20 | 331 | [94] |
Sb nanosheets | 1.0 M NaPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | PAA/CMC | 62.4 | 559 (X = 100) | 5.0 | 359 | [95] |
2D antimonene nanosheet | 1.0 M NaPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | CMC | 77.0 | 642 (X = 200) | 5.0 | 554 | [96] |
Sb2O3/Sb | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 5 vol% FEC | CMC | 67.9 | 659 (X = 200) | 0.3 | 200 | [97] |
Sb/COF | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | Alginate | 58.5 | 320 (X = 160) | 1.0 | 344 | [98] |
Sb/NiSb | 1.0 M NaClO4 | EC:PC = 1:1 vol% with 5 vol% FEC | Binder-free | 86.0 | 521 (X = 100) | 2.0 | 400 | [99] |
Nanoporous SnSb | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 5 wt% FEC | PVDF | 58.0 | 507 (X = 100) | 1.0 | 458 | [100] |
Bi2Sb6 | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 5 wt% FEC | CMC | 69.8 | 258 (X = 2,000) | 1.0 | 150 | [101] |
Sb/TiPOx | 1.0 M NaClO4 | PC with 3 wt% FEC | Alginate | 42.3 | 286 (X = 100) | 1.0 | 147 | [102] |
Sb-based PIB anodes
Sb is accomplished prospective candidate as high-capacity PIB anodes owing to its high theoretical gravimetric and volumetric capacities (660 mAh g-1 and 4,420 mAh cm-3) compared to those of graphite (279 mAh g-1 and 631 mAh cm-3), Si (954 mAh g-1 and 2,223 mAh cm-3), and Sn (226 mAh g-1 and
To confirm the effects of forming an artificial SEI layer, we introduce several relevant studies based on their high electrochemical performance[105-107].
Figure 12. (A) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of an Sb/C anode using KPF6- and KFSI-salt-based electrolytes[105]. (B) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of a pristine Sb anode using carbonate and ether-based electrolytes[106]. (C) Schematic illustration and cyclability of a commercial Sb anode using an EGDE-based electrolyte[107]. This figure is reproduced with permission from
Various approaches involving multidimensional structures have been reported for structural control of Sb-based anodes in PIBs[108-112]. Shi et al. developed a flower-like Sb4O5Cl2 cluster, which was prepared by a hydrothermal method, for PIB use [Figure 13A][108]. The flower-like structure provides diffusion paths for K ions inserted in parallel along its plane. Furthermore, a flower-like Sb4O5Cl2 anode exhibited high reversible capacities of 530, 316, and 150 mAh g-1 at rates of 50, 100, and 150 mA g-1, respectively. Liu et al. suggested the use of honeycomb-like porous microsized layered Sb (porous-Sb) [Figure 13B][109]; the porous Sb was prepared using a template-free hydrothermal method with deionized water. The honeycomb-like porous structure not only provided efficient K-ion transport but also extra space for accommodating volume changes. Based on its structural benefits, porous-Sb exhibited good electrochemical cycling stability with an initial reversible capacity of 655.5 mAh g-1 and a capacity retention of 84% after 80 cycles at a current rate of 50 mA g-1. Imtiaz et al. reported Sb deposited on a Cu15Si4 (Sb/Cu15Si4) nanowire array as an anode, which was synthesized by high-boiling-solvent-mediated vapor-solid-solid growth, with the aim of enhancing the electrochemical performance of Sb [Figure 13C][110]. The Sb/Cu15Si4 nanowire contributed to the outstanding electrochemical performance owing to its mechanically robust, highly stable, and distinctive structure. Furthermore, the Sb/Cu15Si4 nanowire anode exhibited a high initial reversible capacity of 647.9 mAh g-1 at a current rate of 50 mA g-1 and good cycling performance, with a capacity retention of 65% over 1,250 cycles at a high 200 mA g-1 rate. Guo et al. proposed an MXene-based aerogel containing single Sb atoms, quantum dots, and graphene oxide (Sb-SQ@MA) [Figure 13D][111], which was chemically synthesized using few-layered MXene (Ti3C2Tx), graphene oxide (GO), and SbCl3 as precursors. The high electrochemical performance of Sb-SQ@MA was achieved through improved charge-transfer kinetics, enhanced K-storage capability, structural stability, and highly efficient electron transfer. The Sb-SQ@MA anode exhibited a stable capacity retention of 94% with a high reversible capacity of 314 mAh g-1 after 1,000 cycles at a fast current density of 1 A g-1. Consequently, various structural controls have contributed to the stable high rate capability and cycling performance of Sb-based PIB anodes owing to their distinctive structural characteristics that accommodate volume expansion or facilitate K-ion diffusion. He et al. fabricated a 3D macroporous Sb@C composite (Sb@C-3DP) using a simple KCl template [Figure 13E][112]; Sb@C-3DP showed a reversible capacity of 516 mAh g-1 at 50 mA g-1, an ICE of 76.2%, and delivered a capacity retention of 97% after 260 cycles at 500 mAh g-1. A full cell with a Prussian blue cathode delivered a reversible capacity of 508 mAh g-1 (based on anode mass) at a current rate of 0.2 A g-1.
Figure 13. (A) Schematic illustration and cyclability of a flower-like Sb4O5Cl2 PIB anode[108]. (B) Schematic illustration and cyclability of a honeycomb-like porous Sb anode for PIBs[109]. (C) Schematic illustration and cyclability of an Sb/Cu15Si4 nanowire anode for PIBs[110]. (D) Schematic illustration and cyclability of an Sb quantum dot/MXene-based aerogel PIB anode[111]. (E) Schematic illustration, cyclability, and rate capability of a full cell with a 3D macroporous Sb/C composite anode[102]. This figure is reproduced with permission from
Various strategies, such as alloy or composite formation, have been extensively studied for improving the electrochemical properties of Sb anodes for PIBs[12,69,70,105,110-119]. Zheng et al. designed Sb nanoparticles encapsulated in an interconnected carbon-sphere network (Sb/CSN) via an electrospray-assisted strategy
Figure 14. (A) Schematic illustration, SEM image, and cycling performance of an Sb/CSN PIB anode[69]. (B) Schematic illustration, SEM image, and cycling performance of an Sb/NSF-C PIB anode[113]. (C) Schematic illustration and rate performance of an Sb/CNS PIB anode[114]. (D) Schematic illustration, SEM images, and cycling performance of an Sb/C PNF PIB anode[115]. (E) Schematic illustration, SEM image, and cycling performance of a BiSb/C PIB anode[116]. This figure is reproduced with permission from Zheng et al.[69],
K storage properties of Sb-based PIB anodes
Material | Electrolyte | Binder | ICE (%) | Cyclability after the | Rate capability | Ref. | ||
Salt | Solvent | Current rate (A g-1) | Reversible capacity (mAh g-1) | |||||
Sb/C | 1.0 M KFSI | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 64.6 | 470 (X = 50) | - | - | [105] |
Pristine Sb | 4.0 M KFSI | DME | PAA/CMC | 74.2 | 628 (X = 100) | 3.0 | 305 | [106] |
Commercial Sb | 1.0 M KFSI | ethylene glycol diethyl ether | CMC | 69.4 | 573 (X = 180) | 0.5 | 443 | [107] |
Flower-like Sb4O5Cl2 | 3.0 M KFSI | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | PVDF | 27.8 | 190 (X = 40) | 0.5 | 105 | [108] |
Honeycomb-like porous Sb | 4.0 M KFSI | DME | PAA | 74.4 | 551 (X = 80) | 2.0 | 442 | [109] |
Sb/Cu15Si4 nanowire | 4.0 M KFSI | DME | Binder-free | 76.0 | 250 (X = 1,250) | 4.0 | 105 | [110] |
Sb QD/ MXene aerogel | 1.0 M KPF6 | EC:PC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 47.7 | 521 (X = 106) | 3.2 | 246 | [111] |
3D macroporous Sb/C | 5.0 M KFSI | DME | CMC | 76.2 | 342 (X = 260) | 6.4 | 176 | [112] |
Nanoporous Sb | 0.8 M KPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 71.0 | 318 (X = 50) | 0.5 | 265 | [12] |
Sb/CSN | 4.0 M KTFSI | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | Alginate | 61.0 | 551 (X = 100) | 0.2 | 504 | [69] |
Sb/C/rGO | 0.8 M KFSI | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 46.3 | 310 (X = 100) | 1.5 | 110 | [70] |
Sb/NSF-C | 5.0 M KFSI | DME | CMC | 55.1 | 363 (X = 200) | 1.0 | 287 | [113] |
Sb/CNS | 1.0 M KPF6 | EC:DMC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 48.0 | 247 (X = 600) | 2.0 | 101 | [114] |
Sb/C PNFs | 1.0 M KPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | PMMA | 71.3 | 264 (X = 500) | 5.0 | 208 | [115] |
BiSb/C | 5.0 M KFSI | DME | Alginate | 70.2 | 320 (X = 600) | 2.0 | 152 | [116] |
Sb0.25Bi0.75/C | 3.0 M KFSI | DME | PVDF | 45.0 | 302 (X = 500) | 0.5 | 276 | [117] |
Layered Sn-Sb | 4.0 M KFSI | EMC | CMC | 68.0 | 296 (X = 150) | 5.0 | 118 | [118] |
Sb/rGO | 0.8 M KPF6 | EC:DEC = 1:1 vol% | CMC | 49.3 | 300 (X = 40) | 0.5 | 210 | [119] |
Sb-based ASSLIB anodes
Although solid electrolytes provide significant advantages in terms of rigidity, thermal stability, and nonflammability, the direct utilization of Li-metal anodes can induce dendrite formation resulting in short circuits, which remains a critical challenge for ASSLIB development[122]. To address this issue, alloy-based anodes that do not form dendrites have been considered. Lewis et al. investigated the critical differences in the SEI layer formation dynamics of LIBs and ASSLIBs, emphasizing the potential benefits of alloy anodes[123]. Due to its immobility, the solid electrolyte in an ASSLIB inhibits excessive SEI layer formation and subsequent electrolyte depletion during continuous cycling. Therefore, alloy-based anodes form mechanically and chemically denser and more stable SEI layers compared to those of LIBs.
Several studies have reported Sb-based anodes for ASSLIBs using oxide- and boride-based solid electrolytes[124-129]. Afyon et al. fabricated an Sb composite anode by dropping a slurry of Sb,
Figure 15. (A) Schematic illustration of an Sb/LLZO/C composite ASSLIB anode[124]. (B) Schematic illustration, TEM images, and cyclability of a GaSb/LiBH4/C composite ASSLIB anode[125]. (C) Schematic illustration and cyclabilities of Sb/LiBH4/C and
Electrochemical performance of Sb-based ASSLIB anodes
Material | Solid electrolyte | ICE (%) | Cyclability after the Xth cycle (mAh g-1) | Rate capability | Ref. | |
Current rate (A g-1) | Reversible capacity (mAh g-1) | |||||
Sb/LLZO/C | Li6.25Al0.25La3Zr2O12 | 98.0 | 230 (X = 240) | 0.5 | 240 | [124] |
GaSb/LiBH4/C | LiBH4 | 97.2 | 400 (X = 400) | 6.0 | 349 | [125] |
GaSb/LiBH4/C | LiBH4 | 93.2 | 691 (X = 800) | 3.3 | 380 | [126] |
Sb/LiBH4/AB | LiBH4 | 95.0 | 621 (X = 50) | - | - | [127] |
Sb2S3/LiBH4/AB | LiBH4 | 65.0 | 448 (X = 100) | - | - | [128] |
Sb2Se3/LiBH4/AB | LiBH4 | 68.0 | 267 (X = 100) | - | - | [128] |
Sb2Te3/LiBH4/AB | LiBH4 | 52.0 | 236 (X = 100) | - | - | [128] |
Sb2S3/LPS/AB | LiBH4 | 59.0 | 774 (X = 100) | - | - | [129] |
CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK
Sb is a promising alternative high-performance anode material for use in LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs owing to its high theoretical gravimetric and volumetric capacities. However, the significant volume changes experienced by the Sb anode during cycling result in poor cyclability. To address the significant volume-change issue, various strategies based on a complete understanding of the electrochemical reaction mechanisms of Sb anodes have been explored. These strategies include SEI layer control, structural control, and composite/alloy formation.
SEI layer control: Sb-based anodes form unstable SEI layers, which are repeatedly formed and destroyed due to excessive volume changes during cycling. Controlling the composition and structure of the SEI layer is crucial for achieving high cycling stability and reversible capacities. Various electrolyte additives provide robust and chemically stable SEI layers. These SEI layer control strategies prevent continuous electrolyte consumption, achieve superior cycling stability, and inhibit side reactions that result in high ICEs and reversible capacities.
Structural control: Structural control is important for addressing the volume-change issues associated with Sb-based anodes because bulk Sb particles suffer from pulverization owing to large volumetric expansions/contractions. Various multidimensional nanostructures (0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D) provide large surface areas and improve mechanical stability, thereby effectively suppressing and accommodating large volume changes in Sb anodes during cycling. Therefore, structural control of Sb improves cyclability and rate capabilities compared to bulk Sb.
Composite/alloy formation: Sb-based composites and alloys show significant advantages over pristine Sb as anodes for AIBs and ASSLIBs. Incorporating carbon sources into Sb-based composites effectively suppresses the volume change that occurs during repeated cycling, thereby enhancing structural stability. Additionally, the conductive nature of carbon facilitates electron/ion diffusion and contributes to superior cycling stability and high rate capability. In contrast, pristine Sb has low electronic conductivity, leading to rapid capacity degradation and sluggish rate capability. Furthermore, Sb-based alloy materials have been reported to exhibit smaller volume changes during charging and discharging owing to unique reaction mechanisms that involve insertion or conversion reactions.
The abovementioned strategies have led to significant advances in the electrochemical performance of Sb-based anodes for use in LIBs, SIBs, PIBs, and ASSLIBs. The ongoing exploration of innovative strategies is expected to improve the electrochemical performance of Sb-based anodes in terms of cycling stability, rate capability, and reversible capacity. We trust that this review provides a comprehensive insight and guides future research into Sb-based anodes for next-generation battery systems.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Writing original draft, content curation, investigation: Yoon JM, Kim DG
Content curation, investigation, writing of review: Kim DH, Lee YH
Conceptualization, validation, visualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, and writing of review and editing: Park CM
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Financial support and sponsorship
This research was supported by Kumoh National Institute of Technology (2022~2024).
Conflicts of interest
Park CM is an Editorial Board member of the journal Energy Materials, while the other authors have declared that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
REFERENCES
1. Whittingham MS. History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proc IEEE 2012;100:1518-34.
2. Goodenough JB, Park KS. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:1167-76.
3. Tarascon JM, Armand M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001;414:359-67.
4. Ding Y, Cano ZP, Yu A, Lu J, Chen Z. Automotive Li-ion batteries: current status and future perspectives. Electrochem Energy Rev 2019;2:1-28.
5. Dahn JR, Zheng T, Liu Y, Xue JS. Mechanisms for lithium insertion in carbonaceous materials. Science 1995;270:590-3.
6. Palomares V, Casas-cabanas M, Castillo-martínez E, Han MH, Rojo T. Update on Na-based battery materials. A growing research path. Energy Environ Sci 2013;6:2312-37.
7. Palomares V, Serras P, Villaluenga I, Hueso KB, Carretero-González J, Rojo T. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ Sci 2012;5:5884-901.
8. Komaba S, Murata W, Ishikawa T, et al. Electrochemical Na insertion and solid electrolyte interphase for hard-carbon electrodes and application to Na-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2011;21:3859-67.
9. Imtiaz S, Amiinu IS, Xu Y, Kennedy T, Blackman C, Ryan KM. Progress and perspectives on alloying-type anode materials for advanced potassium-ion batteries. Mater Today 2021;48:241-69.
10. Song K, Liu C, Mi L, Chou S, Chen W, Shen C. Recent progress on the alloy-based anode for sodium-ion batteries and potassium-ion batteries. Small 2021;17:e1903194.
11. Sultana I, Rahman MM, Chen Y, Glushenkov AM. Potassium-ion battery anode materials operating through the alloying-dealloying reaction mechanism. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1703857.
12. An Y, Tian Y, Ci L, Xiong S, Feng J, Qian Y. Micron-sized nanoporous antimony with tunable porosity for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2018;12:12932-40.
13. Liu Q, Fan L, Ma R, et al. Super long-life potassium-ion batteries based on an antimony@carbon composite anode. Chem Commun 2018;54:11773-6.
14. Hwang IS, Lee YH, Yoon JM, Hwa Y, Park CM. GaSb nanocomposite: new high-performance anode material for Na- and K-ion batteries. Compos Part B Eng 2022;243:110142.
15. Chen Y, Sun H, Guo J, et al. Research on carbon-based and metal-based negative electrode materials via DFT calculation for high potassium storage performance: a review. Energy Mater 2023;3:300044.
16. Fu T, Li PC, He HC, Ding SS, Cai Y, Zhang M. Electrospinning with sulfur powder to prepare CNF@G-Fe9S10 nanofibers with controllable particles distribution for stable potassium-ion storage. Rare Met 2023;42:111-21.
17. Finegan DP, Scheel M, Robinson JB, et al. In-operando high-speed tomography of lithium-ion batteries during thermal runaway. Nat Commun 2015;6:6924.
18. Takada K, Inada T, Kajiyama A, et al. Solid state batteries with sulfide-based solid electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 2004;172:25-30.
19. Yu S, Siegel DJ. Grain boundary softening: a potential mechanism for lithium metal penetration through stiff solid electrolytes. ACS Appl Mater Inter 2018;10:38151-8.
20. Lu Y, Zhao CZ, Yuan H, Cheng XB, Huang JQ, Zhang Q. Critical Current density in solid-state lithium metal batteries: mechanism, influences, and strategies. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2009925.
21. Ohta N, Takada K, Zhang L, Ma R, Osada M, Sasaki T. Enhancement of the high-rate capability of solid-state lithium batteries by nanoscale interfacial modification. Adv Mater 2006;18:2226-9.
22. Xia X, Dahn JR. Study of the reactivity of Na/hard carbon with different solvents and electrolytes. J Electrochem Soc 2012;159:A515-9.
23. Stevens DA, Dahn JR. The mechanisms of lithium and sodium insertion in carbon materials. J Electrochem Soc 2001;148:A803.
24. Irisarri E, Ponrouch A, Palacin MR. Review - hard carbon negative electrode materials for sodium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2015;162:A2476-82.
25. Takada K, Inada T, Kajiyama A, et al. Solid-state lithium battery with graphite anode. Solid State Ionics 2003;158:269-74.
26. Höltschi L, Borca CN, Huthwelker T, et al. Performance-limiting factors of graphite in sulfide-based all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2021;389:138735.
27. Park CM, Kim JH, Kim H, Sohn HJ. Li-alloy based anode materials for Li secondary batteries. Chem Soc Rev 2010;39:3115-41.
28. Liu N, Li W, Pasta M, Cui Y. Nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage. Front Phys 2014;9:323-50.
29. Obrovac MN, Chevrier VL. Alloy negative electrodes for Li-ion batteries. Chem Rev 2014;114:11444-502.
30. Nam KH, Park CM. Layered Sb2Te3 and its nanocomposite: a new and outstanding electrode material for superior rechargeable Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2016;4:8562-5.
31. Hwang IS, Lee YH, Ganesan V, Hwa Y, Park CM. High-energy-density gallium antimonide compound anode and optimized nanocomposite fabrication route for Li-ion batteries. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2022;5:8940-51.
32. Tian H, Tian H, Wang S, et al. High-power lithium-selenium batteries enabled by atomic cobalt electrocatalyst in hollow carbon cathode. Nat Commun 2020;11:5025.
33. Park CM, Sohn HJ. Quasi-intercalation and facile amorphization in layered ZnSb for Li-ion batteries. Adv Mater 2010;22:47-52.
34. Park CM, Sohn HJ. Novel antimony/aluminum/carbon nanocomposite for high-performance rechargeable lithium batteries. Chem Mater 2008;20:3169-73.
35. Zhao Q, Meng Y, Su L, Cen W, Wang Q, Xiao D. Nitrogen/oxygen codoped hierarchical porous Carbons/Selenium cathode with excellent lithium and sodium storage behavior. J Colloid Interface Sci 2022;608:265-74.
36. He B, Feng L, Hong G, et al. A generic F-doped strategy for biomass hard carbon to achieve fast and stable kinetics in sodium/potassium-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 2024;490:151636.
37. Sung JH, Park CM. Amorphized Sb-based composite for high-performance Li-ion battery anodes. J Electroanal Chem 2013;700:12-6.
38. Sung JH, Park CM. Sb-based nanostructured composite with embedded TiO2 for Li-ion battery anodes. Mater Lett 2013;98:15-8.
39. Chen X, Mu Y, Liao Z, et al. Advancing high-performance one-dimensional Si/carbon anodes: current status and challenges. Carbon Neutral 2024;3:199-221.
40. Ying H, Han WQ. Metallic Sn-based anode materials: application in high-performance lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries. Adv Sci 2017;4:1700298.
41. Wang A, Kadam S, Li H, Shi S, Qi Y. Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries. NPJ Comput Mater 2018;4:15.
42. He M, Kravchyk K, Walter M, Kovalenko MV. Monodisperse antimony nanocrystals for high-rate Li-ion and Na-ion battery anodes: nano versus bulk. Nano Lett 2014;14:1255-62.
43. Park CM, Jeon KJ. Porous structured SnSb/C nanocomposites for Li-ion battery anodes. Chem Commun 2011;47:2122-4.
44. Nam KH, Park CM. 2D layered Sb2Se3-based amorphous composite for high-performance Li- and Na-ion battery anodes. J Power Sources 2019;433:126639.
45. Choi JH, Ha CW, Choi HY, Seong JW, Park CM, Lee SM. Porous carbon-free SnSb anodes for high-performance Na-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2018;386:34-9.
46. Park CM, Sohn HJ. A mechano- and electrochemically controlled SnSb/C nanocomposite for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2009;54:6367-73.
47. Park MG, Song JH, Sohn JS, Lee CK, Park CM. Co-Sb intermetallic compounds and their disproportionated nanocomposites as high-performance anodes for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2014;2:11391-9.
48. Park CM, Sohn HJ. Electrochemical Characteristics of TiSb2 and Sb/TiC/C nanocomposites as anodes for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2010;157:A46.
49. Liu D, Liu ZJ, Li X, et al. Group IVA element (Si, Ge, Sn)-based alloying/dealloying anodes as negative electrodes for full-cell lithium-ion batteries. Small 2017;13:1702000.
50. Park CM, Sohn HJ. Antimonides (FeSb2, CrSb2) with orthorhombic structure and their nanocomposites for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2010;55:4987-94.
51. Seo JU, Park CM. Nanostructured SnSb/MOx (M = Al or Mg)/C composites: hybrid mechanochemical synthesis and excellent Li storage performances. J Mater Chem A 2013;1:15316-22.
52. Li H, Yamaguchi T, Matsumoto S, et al. Circumventing huge volume strain in alloy anodes of lithium batteries. Nat Commun 2020;11:1584.
53. Park CM, Hwa Y, Sung NE, Sohn HJ. Stibnite (Sb2S3) and its amorphous composite as dual electrodes for rechargeable lithium batteries. J Mater Chem 2010;20:1097-102.
54. Jang YH, Park CM. High-performance CoSbS-based Na-ion battery anodes. Mater Today Energy 2020;17:100470.
55. Wang F, Chen G, Zhang N, Liu X, Ma R. Engineering of carbon and other protective coating layers for stabilizing silicon anode materials. Carbon Energy 2019;1:219-45.
56. Meng W, Guo M, Cheng L, Bai Z, Yang F. Effect of polypyrrole coating on lithium storage for hollow Sb microspheres. J Electron Mater 2019;48:2233-41.
57. Gabaudan V, Touja J, Cot D, Flahaut E, Stievano L, Monconduit L. Double-walled carbon nanotubes, a performing additive to enhance capacity retention of antimony anode in potassium-ion batteries. Electrochem Commun 2019;105:106493.
58. Pfeifer K, Arnold S, Budak Ö, et al. Choosing the right carbon additive is of vital importance for high-performance Sb-based Na-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2020;8:6092-104.
59. Wang S, Lee PK, Yang X, Rogach AL, Armstrong AR, Yu DYW. Polyimide-cellulose interaction in Sb anode enables fast charging lithium-ion battery application. Mater Today Energy 2018;9:295-302.
60. Park CM, Yoon S, Lee SI, Kim JH, Jung J, Sohn HJ. High-rate capability and enhanced cyclability of antimony-based composites for lithium rechargeable batteries. J Electrochem Soc 2007;154:A917.
61. Shin J, Kim S, Park H, Won Jang H, Cahill DG, Braun PV. Thermal conductivity of intercalation, conversion, and alloying lithium-ion battery electrode materials as function of their state of charge. Curr Opin Solid St Mater Sci 2022;26:100980.
62. Chang D, Huo H, Johnston KE, et al. Elucidating the origins of phase transformation hysteresis during electrochemical cycling of
63. Darwiche A, Marino C, Sougrati MT, Fraisse B, Stievano L, Monconduit L. Better cycling performances of bulk Sb in Na-ion batteries compared to Li-ion systems: an unexpected electrochemical mechanism. J Am Chem Soc 2012;134:20805-11.
64. Caputo R. An insight into sodiation of antimony from first-principles crystal structure prediction. J Electron Mater 2016;45:999-1010.
65. Yu S, Zhang X, Zhang P. Prediction of new structures of the Na-Sb alloy anode for Na-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 2022;126:11468-74.
66. Yu DK, Park CM. Sb-based intermetallics and nanocomposites as stable and fast Na-ion battery anodes. Chem Eng J 2021;409:127380.
67. Tian W, Zhang S, Huo C, et al. Few-layer antimonene: anisotropic expansion and reversible crystalline-phase evolution enable large-capacity and long-life Na-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2018;12:1887-93.
68. Gabaudan V, Berthelot R, Stievano L, Monconduit L. Inside the alloy mechanism of Sb and Bi electrodes for K-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 2018;122:18266-73.
69. Zheng J, Yang Y, Fan X, et al. Extremely stable antimony-carbon composite anodes for potassium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2019;12:615-23.
70. Ko YN, Choi SH, Kim H, Kim HJ. One-pot formation of Sb-carbon microspheres with graphene sheets: potassium-ion storage properties and discharge mechanisms. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:27973-81.
72. Bian X, Dong Y, Zhao D, et al. Microsized antimony as a stable anode in fluoroethylene carbonate containing electrolytes for rechargeable lithium-/sodium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020;12:3554-62.
73. Sun Q, Cao Z, Ma Z, et al. Dipole-dipole interaction induced electrolyte interfacial model to stabilize antimony anode for high-safety lithium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2022;7:3545-56.
74. Cai T, Sun Q, Cao Z, et al. Electrolyte additive-controlled interfacial models enabling stable antimony anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J Phys Chem C 2022;126:20302-13.
75. Liu X, Tian Y, Cao X, et al. Aerosol-assisted synthesis of spherical Sb/C composites as advanced anodes for lithium ion and sodium ion batteries. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2018;1:6381-7.
76. Schulze MC, Belson RM, Kraynak LA, Prieto AL. Electrodeposition of Sb/CNT composite films as anodes for Li- and Na-ion batteries. Energy Stor Mater 2020;25:572-84.
77. Luo W, Li F, Gaumet J, et al. Bottom-up confined synthesis of nanorod-in-nanotube structured Sb@N-C for durable lithium and sodium storage. Adv Energy Mater 2018;8:1703237.
78. Zhang X, Lai F, Chen Z, He X, Li Q, Wang H. Metallic Sb nanoparticles embedded in carbon nanosheets as anode material for lithium ion batteries with superior rate capability and long cycling stability. Electrochim Acta 2018;283:1689-94.
79. Pan Q, Wu Y, Zheng F, et al. Facile synthesis of M-Sb (M = Ni, Sn) alloy nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon nanosheets as high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Chem Eng J 2018;348:653-60.
80. Yu L, Zhang L, Fu J, Yun J, Kim KH. Hierarchical tiny-Sb encapsulated in MOFs derived-carbon and TiO2 hollow nanotubes for enhanced Li/Na-Ion half-and full-cell batteries. Chem Eng J 2021;417:129106.
81. Yang T, Zhong J, Liu J, et al. A general strategy for antimony-based alloy nanocomposite embedded in swiss-cheese-like nitrogen-doped porous carbon for energy storage. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2009433.
82. Coquil G, Fraisse B, Biscaglia S, Aymé-perrot D, Sougrati MT, Monconduit L. ZnSnSb2 anode: a solid solution behavior enabling high rate capability in Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2019;441:227165.
83. Su M, Li J, He K, et al. NiSb/nitrogen-doped carbon derived from Ni-based framework as advanced anode for lithium-ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci 2023;629:83-91.
84. Pan Q, Wu Y, Zhong W, et al. Carbon nanosheets encapsulated NiSb nanoparticles as advanced anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ Mater 2020;3:186-91.
85. Yin W, Chai W, Wang K, Ye W, Rui Y, Tang B. Facile synthesis of Sb nanoparticles anchored on reduced graphene oxides as excellent anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J Alloy Compd 2019;797:1249-57.
86. Wang H, Yang X, Wu Q, et al. Encapsulating silica/antimony into porous electrospun carbon nanofibers with robust structure stability for high-efficiency lithium storage. ACS Nano 2018;12:3406-16.
87. Lee JO, Seo JU, Song JH, Park CM, Lee CK. Electrochemical characteristics of ternary compound CoSbS for application in Li secondary batteries. Electrochem Commun 2013;28:71-4.
88. Park MG, Lee CK, Park CM. Amorphized ZnSb-based composite anodes for high-performance Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 2014;4:5830-3.
89. Lu H, Wu L, Xiao L, Ai X, Yang H, Cao Y. Investigation of the effect of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on electrochemical performance of Sb-based anode for sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2016;190:402-8.
90. Bodenes L, Darwiche A, Monconduit L, Martinez H. The solid electrolyte interphase a key parameter of the high performance of Sb in sodium-ion batteries: comparative X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of Sb/Na-ion and Sb/Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources 2015;273:14-24.
91. Liu Y, Zhou B, Liu S, Ma Q, Zhang WH. Galvanic replacement synthesis of highly uniform Sb nanotubes: reaction mechanism and enhanced sodium storage performance. ACS Nano 2019;13:5885-92.
92. Liu Y, Qing Y, Zhou B, et al. Yolk-shell Sb@Void@Graphdiyne nanoboxes for high-rate and long cycle life sodium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2023;17:2431-9.
93. Li P, Yu L, Ji S, et al. Facile synthesis of three-dimensional porous interconnected carbon matrix embedded with Sb nanoparticles as superior anode for Na-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 2019;374:502-10.
94. Chen B, Qin H, Li K, et al. Yolk-shelled Sb@C nanoconfined nitrogen/sulfur co-doped 3D porous carbon microspheres for sodium-ion battery anode with ultralong high-rate cycling. Nano Energy 2019;66:104133.
95. Li H, Wang K, Zhou M, et al. Facile tailoring of multidimensional nanostructured Sb for sodium storage applications. ACS Nano 2019;13:9533-40.
96. Yang Y, Shi W, Leng S, Cheng H. Multidimensional antimony nanomaterials tailored by electrochemical engineering for advanced sodium-ion and potassium-ion batteries. J Colloid Interface Sci 2022;628:41-52.
97. Ma W, Wang J, Gao H, et al. A mesoporous antimony-based nanocomposite for advanced sodium ion batteries. Energy Stor Mater 2018;13:247-56.
98. Xie M, Li C, Ren S, et al. Ultrafine Sb nanoparticles in situ confined in covalent organic frameworks for high-performance sodium-ion battery anodes. J Mater Chem A 2022;10:15089-100.
99. Zheng X, You J, Fan J, et al. Electrodeposited binder-free Sb/NiSb anode of sodium-ion batteries with excellent cycle stability and rate capability and new insights into its reaction mechanism by operando XRD analysis. Nano Energy 2020;77:105123.
100. Ma W, Yin K, Gao H, Niu J, Peng Z, Zhang Z. Alloying boosting superior sodium storage performance in nanoporous tin-antimony alloy anode for sodium ion batteries. Nano Energy 2018;54:349-59.
101. Gao H, Niu J, Zhang C, et al. A dealloying synthetic strategy for nanoporous bismuth-antimony anodes for sodium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2018;12:3568-77.
102. Pan J, Yu K, Mao H, et al. Crystalline Sb or Bi in amorphous Ti-based oxides as anode materials for sodium storage. Chem Eng J 2020;380:122624.
103. Choi JH, Ha CW, Choi HY, et al. Sb2S3 embedded in amorphous P/C composite matrix as high-performance anode material for sodium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2016;210:588-95.
104. Nam KH, Choi JH, Park CM. Highly reversible Na-ion reaction in nanostructured Sb2Te3-C composites as Na-ion battery anodes. J Electrochem Soc 2017;164:A2056-64.
105. Zhang Q, Mao J, Pang WK, et al. Boosting the potassium storage performance of alloy-based anode materials via electrolyte salt chemistry. Adv Energy Mater 2018;8:1703288.
106. Zhou L, Cao Z, Zhang J, et al. Electrolyte-mediated stabilization of high-capacity micro-sized antimony anodes for potassium-ion batteries. Adv Mater 2021;33:2005993.
107. Du X, Gao Y, Zhang B. Building elastic solid electrolyte interphases for stabilizing microsized antimony anodes in potassium ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2021;31:2102562.
108. Shi Y, Wang L, Zhou D, Wu T, Xiao Z. A flower-like Sb4O5Cl2 cluster-based material as anode for potassium ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 2022;583:152509.
109. Liu X, Zhu J, Yue L, et al. Green and scalable template-free strategy to fabricate honeycomb-like interconnected porous micro-sized layered Sb for high-performance potassium storage. Small 2022;18:2204552.
110. Imtiaz S, Kapuria N, Amiinu IS, et al. Directly deposited antimony on a copper silicide nanowire array as a high-performance potassium-ion battery anode with a long cycle life. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2209566.
111. Guo X, Gao H, Wang S, et al. MXene-based aerogel anchored with antimony single atoms and quantum dots for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. Nano Lett 2022;22:1225-32.
112. He X, Liu Z, Liao J, et al. A three-dimensional macroporous antimony@carbon composite as a high-performance anode material for potassium-ion batteries. J Mater Chem A 2019;7:9629-37.
113. Shi X, Liu W, Zhao S, et al. Integrated anodes from heteroatoms (N, S, and F) co-doping antimony/carbon composite for efficient alkaline ion (Li+/K+) storage. ACS Appl Energy Mater 2022;5:12925-36.
114. Han Y, Li T, Li Y, et al. Stabilizing antimony nanocrystals within ultrathin carbon nanosheets for high-performance K-ion storage. Energy Stor Mater 2019;20:46-54.
115. Cao K, Liu H, Jia Y, et al. Flexible antimony@carbon integrated anode for high-performance potassium-ion battery. Adv Mater Technol 2020;5:2000199.
116. Xiong P, Wu J, Zhou M, Xu Y. Bismuth-antimony alloy nanoparticle@porous carbon nanosheet composite anode for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. ACS Nano 2020;14:1018-26.
117. Liu J, Zhang D, Cui J, et al. Construction of the fast potassiation path in SbxBi1-x@NC anode with ultrahigh cycling stability for potassium-ion batteries. Small 2023;19:2301444.
118. Ding H, Wang J, Fan L, et al. Sn-Sb compounds with novel structure for stable potassium storage. Chem Eng J 2020;395:125147.
119. Yi Z, Lin N, Zhang W, Wang W, Zhu Y, Qian Y. Preparation of Sb nanoparticles in molten salt and their potassium storage performance and mechanism. Nanoscale 2018;10:13236-41.
120. Baek S, Jie S, Lee B. Effects of fluoroethylene carbonate additive on potassium metal anode. J Mech Sci Technol 2023;37:3657-65.
121. Yoon SU, Kim H, Jin HJ, Yun YS. Effects of fluoroethylene carbonate-induced solid-electrolyte-interface layers on carbon-based anode materials for potassium ion batteries. Appl Surf Sci 2021;547:149193.
122. Wang S, Wu Y, Ma T, Chen L, Li H, Wu F. Thermal stability between sulfide solid electrolytes and oxide cathode. ACS Nano 2022;16:16158-76.
123. Lewis JA, Cavallaro KA, Liu Y, Mcdowell MT. The promise of alloy anodes for solid-state batteries. Joule 2022;6:1418-30.
124. Afyon S, Kravchyk KV, Wang S, et al. Building better all-solid-state batteries with Li-garnet solid electrolytes and metalloid anodes. J Mater Chem A 2019;7:21299-308.
125. Mo F, Ruan J, Fu W, et al. Revealing the role of liquid metals at the anode-electrolyte interface for all solid-state lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2020;12:38232-40.
126. Long Z, Ruan J, Li S, et al. Could capacitive behavior be triggered in inorganic electrolyte-based all-solid-state batteries? Adv Funct Mater 2022;32:2205667.
127. Kumari P, Sharma K, Pal P, Kumar M, Ichikawa T, Jain A. Highly efficient & stable Bi & Sb anodes using lithium borohydride as solid electrolyte in Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv 2019;9:13077-81.
128. Sharma K, Singh R, Ichikawa T, Kumar M, Jain A. Lithiation mechanism of antimony chalcogenides (Sb2X3; X = S, Se, Te) electrodes for high-capacity all-solid-state Li-ion battery. Int J Energy Res 2021;45:11135-45.
Cite This Article
How to Cite
Yoon, J. M.; Kim, D. G.; Kim, D. H.; Lee, Y. H.; Park, C. M. Recent advances in Sb-based anodes for Li/Na/K-ion batteries and all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. Energy Mater. 2024, 4, 400063. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.146
Download Citation
Export Citation File:
Type of Import
Tips on Downloading Citation
Citation Manager File Format
Type of Import
Direct Import: When the Direct Import option is selected (the default state), a dialogue box will give you the option to Save or Open the downloaded citation data. Choosing Open will either launch your citation manager or give you a choice of applications with which to use the metadata. The Save option saves the file locally for later use.
Indirect Import: When the Indirect Import option is selected, the metadata is displayed and may be copied and pasted as needed.
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.