REFERENCES
1. Bonan, G. B.; Doney, S. C. Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: the challenge to predict life in earth system models. Science 2018, 359, eaam8328.
3. Anderies, J. M.; Carpenter, S. R.; Steffen, W.; Rockström, J. The topology of non-linear global carbon dynamics: from tipping points to planetary boundaries. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 044048.
4. Lenton, T. M.; Held, H.; Kriegler, E.; et al. Tipping elements in the earth's climate system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008, 105, 1786-93.
5. Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 2009, 14, art32.
6. Armstrong McKay, D. I.; Staal, A.; Abrams, J. F.; et al. Exceeding 1.5℃ global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 2022, 377, eabn7950.
7. Mills, B. J. W.; Tennenbaum, S.; Schwartzman, D. Exploring multiple steady states in earth's long-term carbon cycle. Am. J. Sci. 2021, 321, 1033-44.
8. Zhu, F.; Rose, B. E. J. Multiple equilibria in a coupled climate–carbon model. J. Clim. 2023, 36, 547-64.
9. Chiquier, S.; Gurgel, A.; Morris, J.; Chen, Y. H.; Paltsev, S. Integrated assessment of carbon dioxide removal portfolios: land, energy, and economic trade-offs for climate policy. Environ. Res. Lett. 2025, 20, 024002.
10. Keller, D. P.; Lenton, A.; Littleton, E. W.; Oschlies, A.; Scott, V.; Vaughan, N. E. The effects of carbon dioxide removal on the carbon cycle. Curr. Clim. Change. Rep. 2018, 4, 250-65.
11. Morrow, D. R.; Thompson, M. S.; Anderson, A.; et al. Principles for thinking about carbon dioxide removal in just climate policy. One. Earth. 2020, 3, 150-53.
12. Shukla, P. R.; Skea, J.; Reisinger, A.; et al. Climate change 2022 - mitigation of climate change. In Proceedings of the Contribution of Working Group Ⅲ Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2023.
13. Bindl, M.; Edwards, M. R.; Cui, R. Y. Risks of relying on uncertain carbon dioxide removal in climate policy. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5958.
14. Buylova, A.; Fridahl, M.; Nasiritousi, N.; Reischl, G. Cancel (out) emissions? The envisaged role of carbon dioxide removal technologies in long-term national climate strategies. Front. Clim. 2021, 3, 675499.
15. Keller, D. P.; Lenton, A.; Scott, V.; et al. The carbon dioxide removal model intercomparison project (CDRMIP): rationale and experimental protocol for CMIP6. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2018, 11, 1133-60.
16. Asaadi, A.; Schwinger, J.; Lee, H.; et al. Carbon cycle feedbacks in an idealized simulation and a scenario simulation of negative emissions in CMIP6 earth system models. Biogeosciences 2024, 21, 411-35.
17. Mendez, Q. R.; Creutzig, F.; Fuss, S. Deep uncertainty in carbon dioxide removal portfolios. Environ. Res. Lett. 2025, 20, 054013.
18. Yao, Y.; Zhang, B. Life cycle assessment in the monitoring, reporting, and verification of land-based carbon dioxide removal: gaps and opportunities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2025, 59, 11950-63.
19. Streck, C.; Minoli, S.; Roe, S.; et al. Considering durability in carbon dioxide removal strategies for climate change mitigation. Clim. Policy. 2026, 26, 493-501.
20. Ampah, J. D.; Jin, C.; Liu, H.; et al. Deployment expectations of multi-gigatonne scale carbon removal could have adverse impacts on Asia's energy-water-land nexus. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6342.
21. Smith, S. M.; Geden, O.; Gidden, M. J.; et al. The. state. of. carbon. dioxide. removal,. 2nd. ed. 2024.
22. Reed, K. A.; Medeiros, B.; Jablonowski, C.; Simpson, I. R.; Voigt, A.; Wing, A. A. Why idealized models are more important than ever in earth system science. AGU. Adv. 2025, 6, e2025AV001716.
23. Conradi, C.; Flockerzi, D.; Raisch, J.; Stelling, J. Subnetwork analysis reveals dynamic features of complex (bio)chemical networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007, 104, 19175-80.
24. Hernandez, B. S.; De La Cruz, R. J. L. Independent decompositions of chemical reaction networks. Bull. Math. Biol. 2021, 83, 76.
25. Delmas, E.; Besson, M.; Brice, M. H.; et al. Analysing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol. Rev. 2018, 94, 16-36.
26. Veloz, T.; Flores, D. Reaction network modeling of complex ecological interactions: endosymbiosis and multilevel regulation. Complexity 2021, 2021, 8760937.
27. Avram, F.; Adenane, R.; Neagu, M. Advancing mathematical epidemiology and chemical reaction network theory via synergies between them. Entropy 2024, 26, 936.
28. Alamin, A. J. L. J.; Cruz, M. J. T.; Hernandez, B. S.; Mendoza, E. R. The long-term impact of direct capture approaches to carbon dioxide removal. Match. Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2026, 1, 161.
29. Fortun, N.; Gaspar, P.; Jose, E.; Lao, A.; Mendoza, E.; Razon, L. A reaction network approach to modeling carbon dioxide removal systems. Process. Integr. Optim. Sustain. 2025, 10, 1433-57.
30. Fortun, N. T.; Lao, A. R.; Mendoza, E. R.; Razon, L. F. Parameter-minimal analysis of carbon dioxide removal through direct air capture. Match. Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 2026, 95, 695-729.
31. Fortun, N. T.; Mendoza, E. R. Comparative analysis of carbon cycle models via kinetic representations. J. Math. Chem. 2023, 61, 896-932.
32. Fortun, N. T.; Mendoza, E. R.; Razon, L. F.; Lao, A. R. A deficiency-one algorithm for power-law kinetic systems with reactant-determined interactions. J. Math. Chem. 2018, 56, 2929-62.
33. Steffen, W.; Richardson, K.; Rockstrom, J.; et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 2015, 347, 1259855.
34. Savageau, M. Biochemical Systems analysis: Ⅰ. Some mathematical properties of the rate law for the component enzymatic reactions. Am. J. Sci. 1969, 25, 365-69.
35. Savageau, M. Development of fractal kinetic theory for enzyme-catalysed reactions and implications for the design of biochemical pathways. BioSystems 1998, 47, 9-36.
37. García, J. H.; Torvanger, A. Carbon leakage from geological storage sites: implications for carbon trading. Energy. Policy. 2019, 127, 320-29.
38. Stone, E. J.; Lowe, J. A.; Shine, K. P. The impact of carbon capture and storage on climate. Energy. Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 81-91.
39. Beerling, D. J.; Reinhard, C. T.; James, R. H.; Khan, A.; Pidgeon, N.; Planavsky, N. J. Challenges and opportunities in scaling enhanced weathering for carbon dioxide removal. Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ. 2025, 6, 672-86.
40. Bergero, C.; Wise, M.; Lamers, P.; Wang, Y.; Weber, M. Biochar as a carbon dioxide removal strategy in integrated long-run mitigation scenarios. Environ. Res. Lett. 2024, 19, 074076.
41. Buesseler, K. O.; Bianchi, D.; Chai, F.; et al. Next steps for assessing ocean iron fertilization for marine carbon dioxide removal. Front. Clim. 2024, 6, 1430957.
42. Paustian, K.; Larson, E.; Kent, J.; Marx, E.; Swan, A. Soil C sequestration as a biological negative emission strategy. Front. Clim. 2019, 1, 8.
43. Taillardat, P.; Thompson, B. S.; Garneau, M.; Trottier, K.; Friess, D. A. Climate change mitigation potential of wetlands and the cost-effectiveness of their restoration. Interface. Focus. 2020, 10, 20190129.
44. Ganti, G.; Gasser, T.; Bui, M.; et al. Evaluating the near- and long-term role of carbon dioxide removal in meeting global climate objectives. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2024, 5, 377.
45. Oschlies, A.; Bach, L. T.; Rickaby, R. E. M.; Satterfield, T.; Webb, R.; Gattuso, J. Climate targets, carbon dioxide removal, and the potential role of ocean alkalinity enhancement. In: Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Research; State Planet 2023, 2-oae2023, 1-9.
46. Ashwin, P.; Wieczorek, S.; Vitolo, R.; Cox, P. Tipping points in open systems: bifurcation, noise-induced and rate-dependent examples in the climate system. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A. 2012, 370, 1166-84.
47. Farahbakhsh, I.; Bauch, C. T.; Anand, M. Tipping points in coupled human-environment system models: a review. Earth. Syst. Dynam. 2024, 15, 947-67.
48. Wieczorek, S.; Ashwin, P.; Luke, C. M.; Cox, P. M. Excitability in ramped systems: the compost-bomb instability. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2011, 467, 1243-69.
49. Schmidt, H. P.; Abiven, S.; Cowie, A.; et al. Biochar permanence: a policy commentary. GCB. Bioenergy. 2025, 17, e70092.
50. Breure, T. S.; De Rosa, D.; Panagos, P.; Cotrufo, M. F.; Jones, A.; Lugato, E. Revisiting the soil carbon saturation concept to inform a risk index in European agricultural soils. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 2570.
51. Emerson, D.; Sofen, L. E.; Michaud, A. B.; Archer, S. D.; Twining, B. S. A cost model for ocean iron fertilization as a means of carbon dioxide removal that compares ship- and aerial-based delivery, and estimates verification costs. Earth's. Future. 2024, 12, e2023EF003732.
52. Shinar, G.; Feinberg, M. Design principles for robust biochemical reaction networks: what works, what cannot work, and what might almost work. Math. Biosci. 2011, 231, 39-48.
53. Wiuf, C.; Feliu, E. Power-law kinetics and determinant criteria for the preclusion of multistationarity in networks of interacting species. SIAM. J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 2013, 12, 1685-721.
54. Wiuf, C.; Feliu, E. A computational method to preclude multistationarity in networks of interacting species. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2327-34.
55. Hernandez, B. S.; Mendoza, E. R.; Reyes, V. A. A. D. L. A computational approach to multistationarity of power-law kinetic systems. J. Math. Chem. 2020, 58, 367-96.
