REFERENCES
1. Xian, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Zhong, Y. Driving factors and reduction paths dynamic simulation optimization of carbon dioxide emissions in China's construction industry under the perspective of dual carbon targets. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 2025, 112, 107789.
2. Zheng, Z.; Shuang, Q. Dynamic scenario analysis and prediction of embodied carbon emissions in China's building sector: a hybrid interpretable machine learning model. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 2026, 116, 108119.
3. World Bank. Total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions excluding land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) (million tonnes of CO2 equivalent) - world. 2025. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/EN.GHG.CO2.MT.CE.AR5 [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
4. Cheng, B.; Lu, K.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Luo, X.; Shafique, M. Comprehensive assessment of embodied environmental impacts of buildings using normalized environmental impact factors. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 334, 130083.
5. Gao, H.; Sun, M.; Zuo, L.; Liang, Y. An LCA-BIM-GIS integrated model for net carbon emission quantification of buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2026, 120, 115392.
6. United Nations Environment Programme. Global status report for buildings and construction 2024/2025. 2025. Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-status-report-buildings-and-construction-20242025 [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
7. World Bank. Urban population. 2025. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
8. National Bureau of Statistics. National data. 2025. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2025/indexch.htm [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
9. National Bureau of Statistics. China population census yearbook 2020 (Chinese). 2025. Available from: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/7rp/zk/indexch.htm [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
10. World Bank. Rural population (% of total population) - India. 2025. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org.cn/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=IN [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
11. Li, Y.; Xu, W.; Chen, H.; Jiang, J.; Li, X. A novel framework based on mask R-CNN and histogram thresholding for scalable segmentation of new and old rural buildings. Remote. Sens. 2021, 13, 1070.
12. Jiang, Y.; Hu, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, T.; Wei, Q. China’s building energy use and GHG emissions. In: Decarbonize public and commercial buildings. Singapore: Springer; 2022, pp. 3-43.
13. Ottelin, J.; Heinonen, J.; Nässén, J.; Junnila, S. Household carbon footprint patterns by the degree of urbanisation in Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 114016.
14. Pang, M.; Meirelles, J.; Moreau, V.; Binder, C. Urban carbon footprints: a consumption-based approach for Swiss households. Environ. Res. Commun. 2019, 2, 011003.
15. Li, H.; Luo, Z.; Xu, X.; Cang, Y.; Yang, L. Assessing the embodied carbon reduction potential of straw bale rural houses by hybrid life cycle assessment: a four-case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 303, 127002.
16. Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y. Life cycle carbon emission reduction potential of a new steel-bamboo composite frame structure for residential houses. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 39, 102295.
17. Gong, X.; Nie, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cui, S.; Gao, F.; Zuo, T. Life cycle energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of residential building designs in Beijing: a comparative study. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, 576-87.
18. Yang, X.; Zhang, S.; Wang, K. Quantitative study of life cycle carbon emissions from 7 timber buildings in China. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2021, 26, 1721-34.
19. Yu, D.; Tan, H.; Ruan, Y. A future bamboo-structure residential building prototype in China: life cycle assessment of energy use and carbon emission. Energy. Build. 2011, 43, 2638-46.
20. Li, L.; Chen, K. Quantitative assessment of carbon dioxide emissions in construction projects: a case study in Shenzhen. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 141, 394-408.
21. Zhang, X.; Du, J.; Sharples, S. A parametric analysis of future climate change effects on the energy performance and carbon emissions of a Chinese prefabricated timber house. Build. Serv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2022, 44, 167-85.
22. Cai, K.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; et al. Mitigating lifecycle GHG emissions of building sector through prefabricated light-steel buildings in comparison with traditional cast-in-place buildings. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2023, 194, 107007.
23. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, S. Carbon emission-based life cycle assessment of rural residential buildings constructed with engineering bamboo: a case study in China. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 76, 107182.
24. Yan, S.; Shi, F.; Zheng, C.; Ma, Y.; Huang, J. Whole biomass material envelope system for nearly-zero energy houses: carbon footprint and construction cost assessment. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 86, 108757.
25. Zhao, Z.; Chen, H.; Liu, H.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, T.; Zhou, T. Embodied carbon emission reduction potential of new steel-timber composite frame structure for rural houses. Structures 2024, 61, 106121.
26. Huang, Z.; Tang, H.; Wen, Y.; Sun, W.; Zhou, H.; Lin, B. Life-cycle carbon emission calculation and reduction for rural dwellings of “hollow village”: a case study in South China. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 2024, 106, 107514.
27. Song, X.; Xu, W.; Miao, J.; Zheng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X. Low-carbon renewal strategies of bungalow courtyards in Beijing. Energy. Build. 2025, 332, 115374.
28. Suzuki, M.; Oka, T.; Okada, K. The estimation of energy consumption and CO2 emission due to housing construction in Japan. Energy. Build. 1995, 22, 165-9.
29. Gerilla, G.; Teknomo, K.; Hokao, K. An environmental assessment of wood and steel reinforced concrete housing construction. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 2778-84.
30. Jeong, Y.; Lee, S.; Huh, J. Estimation of CO2 emission of apartment buildings due to major construction materials in the Republic of Korea. Energy. Build. 2012, 49, 437-42.
31. Mehravar, M.; Veshkini, A.; Veiseh, S.; Fayaz, R. Physical properties of straw bale and its effect on building energy conservation and carbon emissions in different climatic regions of Iran. Energy. Build. 2022, 254, 111559.
32. Hosseinian, S. M.; Faghani, M. Assessing the effect of structural parameters and building site in achieving low carbon building materialization using a life-cycle assessment approach. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 44, 103318.
33. Piroozfar, P.; Pomponi, F.; El-Alem, F. Life cycle environmental impact assessment of contemporary and traditional housing in Palestine. Energy. Build. 2019, 202, 109333.
34. Balasbaneh, A. T.; Bin Marsono, A. K. Strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from residential sector by proposing new building structures in hot and humid climatic conditions. Build. Environ. 2017, 124, 357-68.
35. Wan Omar, W. M. S. A hybrid life cycle assessment of embodied energy and carbon emissions from conventional and industrialised building systems in Malaysia. Energy. Build. 2018, 167, 253-68.
36. Balasbaneh, A. T.; Ramli, M. Z. A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete and steel-prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction structures in Malaysia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 43186-201.
37. Omar, W. M. S. W.; Doh, J.; Panuwatwanich, K.; Miller, D. Assessment of the embodied carbon in precast concrete wall panels using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach in Malaysia. Sustain. Cities. Soc. 2014, 10, 101-11.
38. Bin Marsono, A. K.; Balasbaneh, A. T. Combinations of building construction material for residential building for the global warming mitigation for Malaysia. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 85, 100-8.
39. Atmaca, A.; Atmaca, N. Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey. Energy. Build. 2015, 102, 417-31.
40. Kayaçetin, N. C.; Hozatlı, B. Whole life carbon assessment of representative building typologies for nearly zero energy building definitions. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 95, 110214.
41. Myint, N. N.; Shafique, M. Embodied carbon emissions of buildings: taking a step towards net zero buildings. Case. Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 20, e03024.
42. Ajay, K.; Mainali, B.; Ghimire, A.; Adhikari, B.; Lohani, S. P.; Baral, B. Role of vernacular architecture in enhancing the environmental sustainability of the building sector. Energy. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 86, 101695.
43. Francis, A.; Padmanabhan, V.; Thomas, A. A life cycle assessment - based case study analysis of the sustainability of “vernacular” versus contemporary construction techniques. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2024, 32, 6187-212.
44. Passer, A.; Kreiner, H.; Maydl, P. Assessment of the environmental performance of buildings: A critical evaluation of the influence of technical building equipment on residential buildings. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2012, 17, 1116-30.
45. Krasny, E.; Klarić, S.; Korjenić, A. Analysis and comparison of environmental impacts and cost of bio-based house versus concrete house. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 968-76.
46. Pal, S. K.; Takano, A.; Alanne, K.; Siren, K. A life cycle approach to optimizing carbon footprint and costs of a residential building. Build. Environ. 2017, 123, 146-62.
47. Thiers, S.; Peuportier, B. Energy and environmental assessment of two high energy performance residential buildings. Build. Environ. 2012, 51, 276-84.
48. Thiers, S.; Peuportier, B. Thermal and environmental assessment of a passive building equipped with an earth-to-air heat exchanger in France. Solar. Energy. 2008, 82, 820-31.
49. Houlihan Wiberg, A.; Georges, L.; Dokka, T. H.; et al. A net zero emission concept analysis of a single-family house. Energy. Build. 2014, 74, 101-10.
50. Kristjansdottir, T. F.; Heeren, N.; Andresen, I.; Brattebø, H. Comparative emission analysis of low-energy and zero-emission buildings. Build. Res. Inf. 2017, 46, 367-82.
51. Famuyibo, A.; Duffy, A.; Strachan, P. Achieving a holistic view of the life cycle performance of existing dwellings. Build. Environ. 2013, 70, 90-101.
52. Moran, P.; Goggins, J.; Hajdukiewicz, M. Super-insulate or use renewable technology? Life cycle cost, energy and global warming potential analysis of nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) in a temperate oceanic climate. Energy. Build. 2017, 139, 590-607.
53. Asdrubali, F.; Baldassarri, C.; Fthenakis, V. Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: Guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy. Build. 2013, 64, 73-89.
54. Blengini, G. A.; Di Carlo, T. The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy. Build. 2010, 42, 869-80.
55. Blengini, G. A.; Di Carlo, T. Energy-saving policies and low-energy residential buildings: an LCA case study to support decision makers in Piedmont (Italy). Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2010, 15, 652-65.
56. Vitale, P.; Spagnuolo, A.; Lubritto, C.; Arena, U. Environmental performances of residential buildings with a structure in cold formed steel or reinforced concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 189, 839-52.
57. Proietti, S.; Sdringola, P.; Desideri, U.; Zepparelli, F.; Masciarelli, F.; Castellani, F. Life cycle assessment of a passive house in a seismic temperate zone. Energy. Build. 2013, 64, 463-72.
58. Souaid, C.; Ten, Caat. P. N.; Meijer, A.; Visscher, H. Downsizing and the use of timber as embodied carbon reduction strategies for new-build housing: a partial life cycle assessment. Build. Environ. 2024, 253, 111285.
59. Parece, S.; Resende, R.; Rato, V. A BIM-based tool for embodied carbon assessment using a construction classification system. Dev. Built. Environ. 2024, 19, 100467.
60. Bastos, J.; Batterman, S. A.; Freire, F. Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of three building types in a residential area in Lisbon. Energy. Build. 2014, 69, 344-53.
61. Monteiro, H.; Freire, F. Life-cycle assessment of a house with alternative exterior walls: comparison of three impact assessment methods. Energy. Build. 2012, 47, 572-83.
62. Zabalza Bribián, I.; Aranda Usón, A.; Scarpellini, S. Life cycle assessment in buildings: State-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 2510-20.
63. Ortiz, O.; Bonnet, C.; Bruno, J. C.; Castells, F. Sustainability based on LCM of residential dwellings: a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 584-94.
64. Pacheco-Torres, R.; Jadraque, E.; Roldán-Fontana, J.; Ordóñez, J. Analysis of CO2 emissions in the construction phase of single-family detached houses. Sustain. Cities. Soc. 2014, 12, 63-8.
65. Davis, A.; Quintana-Gallardo, A.; Martí Audí, N.; Guillén Guillamón, I. The impact of lifespan assumptions in LCA: comparing the replacement of building parts versus building layers—A housing case study. Energy. Build. 2025, 326, 115050.
66. Izaola, B.; Akizu-Gardoki, O. Biodiversity burdens in Spanish conventional and low-impact single-family homes. Sci. Total. Environ. 2024, 909, 168371.
67. Petrović, B.; Eriksson, O.; Zhang, X. Carbon assessment of a wooden single-family building - A novel deep green design and elaborating on assessment parameters. Build. Environ. 2023, 233, 110093.
68. Gustavsson, L.; Joelsson, A.; Sathre, R. Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building. Energy. Build. 2010, 42, 230-42.
69. Gustavsson, L.; Joelsson, A. Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings. Energy. Build. 2010, 42, 210-20.
70. Nässén, J.; Holmberg, J.; Wadeskog, A.; Nyman, M. Direct and indirect energy use and carbon emissions in the production phase of buildings: an input-output analysis. Energy 2007, 32, 1593-602.
71. Karami, P.; Al-Ayish, N.; Gudmundsson, K. A comparative study of the environmental impact of Swedish residential buildings with vacuum insulation panels. Energy. Build. 2015, 109, 183-94.
72. Petrovic, B.; Myhren, J. A.; Zhang, X.; Wallhagen, M.; Eriksson, O. Life cycle assessment of a wooden single-family house in Sweden. Appl. Energy. 2019, 251, 113253.
73. Peñaloza, D.; Erlandsson, M.; Falk, A. Exploring the climate impact effects of increased use of bio-based materials in buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 219-26.
74. Jonsson, A.; Bjorklund, T.; Tillman, A. LCA of concrete and steel building frames. Int. J. LCA. 1998, 3, 216-24.
75. Citherlet, S.; Defaux, T. Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 591-8.
76. Bertini, A.; Al-Obaidy, M.; Dasse, M.; Amaripadath, D.; Gobbo, E.; Attia, S. Parametrization of variables affecting the whole life carbon performance of nearly zero energy residential building renovation. Build. Environ. 2025, 278, 113013.
77. Norouzi, M.; Haddad, A. N.; Jiménez, L.; Mohajerani, M.; Boer, D. Long-term decarbonization prediction of buildings accounting for temporal variations in grid and material emission factors: a case study of timber-framed passive houses in the United Kingdom. Renew. Energy. 2025, 242, 122476.
78. Keyhani, M.; Bahadori‐Jahromi, A.; Fu, C.; Godfrey, P.; Zhang, H. Whole‐life embodied carbon reduction strategies in UK buildings: a comprehensive analysis. Energy. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 5370-84.
79. Mohammadpourkarbasi, H.; Riddle, B.; Liu, C.; Sharples, S. Life cycle carbon assessment of decarbonising UK’s hard-to-treat homes: a comparative study of conventional retrofit vs EnerPHit, heat pump first vs fabric first and ecological vs petrochemical retrofit approaches. Energy. Build. 2023, 296, 113353.
80. Norouzi, M.; Haddad, A. N.; Jiménez, L.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Boer, D. Carbon footprint of low-energy buildings in the United Kingdom: effects of mitigating technological pathways and decarbonization strategies. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 882, 163490.
81. Newberry, P.; Harper, P.; Norman, J. Carbon assessment of building shell options for eco self-build community housing through the integration of building energy modelling and life cycle analysis tools. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 70, 106356.
82. Cuéllar-Franca, R. M.; Azapagic, A. Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses. Build. Environ. 2012, 54, 86-99.
83. Moncaster, A.; Symons, K. A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards. Energy. Build. 2013, 66, 514-23.
84. Monahan, J.; Powell, J. An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: a case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy. Build. 2011, 43, 179-88.
85. Asif, M.; Muneer, T.; Kelley, R. Life cycle assessment: a case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Build. Environ. 2007, 42, 1391-4.
86. Iddon, C. R.; Firth, S. K. Embodied and operational energy for new-build housing: a case study of construction methods in the UK. Energy. Build. 2013, 67, 479-88.
87. Hacker, J. N.; De Saulles, T. P.; Minson, A. J.; Holmes, M. J. Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: a case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change. Energy. Build. 2008, 40, 375-84.
88. Essaghouri, L.; Mao, R.; Li, X. Environmental benefits of using hempcrete walls in residential construction: an LCA-based comparative case study in Morocco. Environ. Impact. Assess. Rev. 2023, 100, 107085.
89. Hansen, R. N.; Eliassen, J. L.; Schmidt, J.; et al. Environmental consequences of shifting to timber construction: the case of Denmark. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 46, 54-67.
90. Rossi, B.; Marique, A.; Reiter, S. Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, case study. Build. Environ. 2012, 51, 402-7.
91. Rossi, B.; Marique, A.; Glaumann, M.; Reiter, S. Life-cycle assessment of residential buildings in three different European locations, basic tool. Build. Environ. 2012, 51, 395-401.
92. Hafner, A.; Schäfer, S. Comparative LCA study of different timber and mineral buildings and calculation method for substitution factors on building level. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 167, 630-42.
93. Quintana-Gallardo, A.; Schau, E. M.; Niemelä, E. P.; Burnard, M. D. Comparing the environmental impacts of wooden buildings in Spain, Slovenia, and Germany. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 329, 129587.
94. Moghayedi, A.; Awuzie, B. O. A framework for facilitating low-income net-zero energy housing delivery in developing countries: insights from a practical case in South Africa. Build. Environ. 2025, 276, 112847.
95. Moghayedi, A.; Mahachi, J.; Lediga, R.; Mosiea, T.; Phalafala, E. Revolutionizing affordable housing in Africa: a comprehensive technical and sustainability study of 3D-printing technology. Sustain. Cities. Soc. 2024, 105, 105329.
96. Salazar, J.; Meil, J. Prospects for carbon-neutral housing: the influence of greater wood use on the carbon footprint of a single-family residence. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 1563-71.
97. Zhang, W.; Tan, S.; Lei, Y.; Wang, S. Life cycle assessment of a single-family residential building in Canada: a case study. Build. Simul. 2013, 7, 429-38.
98. Keoleian, G. A.; Blanchard, S.; Reppe, P. Life‐cycle energy, costs, and strategies for improving a single‐family house. J. Ind. Ecol. 2008, 4, 135-56.
99. Arvizu-Piña, V. A.; Armendáriz López, J. F.; García González, A. A.; Barrera Alarcón, I. G. An open access online tool for LCA in building’s early design stage in the Latin American context. A screening LCA case study for a bioclimatic building. Energy. Build. 2023, 295, 113269.
100. Ortiz, O.; Castells, F.; Sonnemann, G. Operational energy in the life cycle of residential dwellings: the experience of Spain and Colombia. Appl. Energy. 2010, 87, 673-80.
101. Ortiz-Rodríguez, O.; Castells, F.; Sonnemann, G. Life cycle assessment of two dwellings: one in Spain, a developed country, and one in Colombia, a country under development. Sci. Total. Environ. 2010, 408, 2435-43.
102. Sandanayake, M.; Zhang, G.; Setunge, S. Environmental emissions at foundation construction stage of buildings - Two case studies. Build. Environ. 2016, 95, 189-98.
103. Mosteiro-Romero, M.; Krogmann, U.; Wallbaum, H.; Ostermeyer, Y.; Senick, J. S.; Andrews, C. J. Relative importance of electricity sources and construction practices in residential buildings: a Swiss-US comparison of energy related life-cycle impacts. Energy. Build. 2014, 68, 620-31.
104. Shi, L.; Qi, X.; Yang, Z.; et al. Comparative study of greenhouse gas emission calculations and the environmental impact in the life cycle assessment of buildings in China, Finland, and the United States. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 70, 106396.
105. Huang, Z.; Zhou, H.; Miao, Z.; Tang, H.; Lin, B.; Zhuang, W. Life-cycle carbon emissions (LCCE) of buildings: implications, calculations, and reductions. Engineering 2024, 35, 115-39.
106. World Steel Association. Life cycle assessment methodology report. 2011. Available from: https://worldsteel.org/wp-content/uploads/Life-cycle-inventory-methodology-report.pdf [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
107. Hasanbeigi, A.; Arens, M.; Cardenas, J. C. R.; Price, L.; Triolo, R. Comparison of carbon dioxide emissions intensity of steel production in China, Germany, Mexico, and the United States. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 113, 127-39.
108. Park, J.; Tae, S.; Kim, T. Life cycle CO2 assessment of concrete by compressive strength on construction site in Korea. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2012, 16, 2940-6.
109. World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Greenhouse gas protocol product life cycle accounting and reporting standard. 2011. Available from: https://www.wri.org/research/greenhouse-gas-protocol-product-life-cycle-accounting-and-reporting-standard [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].
110. Teng, Y.; Pan, W. Systematic embodied carbon assessment and reduction of prefabricated high-rise public residential buildings in Hong Kong. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 238, 117791.
111. Izaola, B.; Akizu-gardoki, O.; Oregi, X. Setting baselines of the embodied, operational and whole life carbon emissions of the average Spanish residential building. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023, 40, 252-64.
112. Peng, P.; Wang, H. Solar chimney design in rural areas of Anhui, China: CFD simulation, energy and carbon footprint assessment. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110590.
113. Kamazani, M. A.; Dixit, M. K. Multi-objective optimization of embodied and operational energy and carbon emission of a building envelope. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 428, 139510.
114. Pacca, S.; Sivaraman, D.; Keoleian, G. A. Parameters affecting the life cycle performance of PV technologies and systems. Energy. Policy. 2007, 35, 3316-26.
115. Lei, B.; Yang, W.; Yan, Y.; Zaland, S.; Tang, Z.; Dong, W. Carbon-saving benefits of various end-of-life strategies for different types of building structures. Dev. Built. Environ. 2023, 16, 100264.
116. Chang, Y.; Ries, R. J.; Lei, S. The embodied energy and emissions of a high-rise education building: A quantification using process-based hybrid life cycle inventory model. Energy. Build. 2012, 55, 790-8.
