REFERENCES

1. Wiedmann, T.; Lenzen, M.; Keyßer, L. T.; Steinberger, J. K. Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3107.

2. Miller, R. E.; Blair, P. D. Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University Press; 2022. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/ee/universitypress/subjects/economics/econometrics-statistics-and-mathematical-economics/input-output-analysis-foundations-and-extensions-3rd-edition?format=HB&isbn=9781108723534 [Last accessed on 15 Jul 2026].

3. Harris, S.; Weinzettel, J.; Bigano, A.; Källmén, A. Low carbon cities in 2050? GHG emissions of European cities using production-based and consumption-based emission accounting methods. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119206.

4. Muñoz, P.; Steininger, K. W. Austria's CO₂ responsibility and the carbon content of its international trade. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2003-19.

5. Kanemoto, K.; Moran, D.; Lenzen, M.; Geschke, A. International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: new evidence from air pollution. Global. Environ. Chang. 2014, 24, 52-9.

6. Wood, R.; Stadler, K.; Simas, M.; et al. Growth in environmental footprints and environmental impacts embodied in trade: resource efficiency indicators from EXIOBASE3. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 553-64.

7. Chancel, L. Global carbon inequality over 1990-2019. Nat. Sustain. 2022, 5, 931-8.

8. Ottelin, J.; Ala-Mantila, S.; Heinonen, J.; Wiedmann, T.; Clarke, J.; Junnila, S. What can we learn from consumption-based carbon footprints at different spatial scales? Review of policy implications. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 093001.

9. Lylykangas, K.; Cachia, R.; Cerrone, D.; et al. Territorial and consumption-based greenhouse gas emissions assessments: implications for spatial planning policies. Land 2023, 12, 1144.

10. Dawkins, E.; Rahmati-Abkenar, M.; Axelsson, K.; Grah, R.; Broekhoff, D. The carbon footprints of consumption of goods and services in Sweden at municipal and postcode level and policy interventions. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2024, 52, 63-79.

11. Owen, A.; Büchs, M. Examining changes in household carbon footprints across generations in the UK using decomposition analysis. J. Ind. Ecol. 2024, 28, 1786-800.

12. Luqman, M.; Rayner, P. J.; Gurney, K. R. On the impact of urbanisation on CO₂ emissions. NPJ. Urban. Sustain. 2023, 3, 6.

13. Jones, C.; Kammen, D. M. Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 895-902.

14. Guo, X.; Shahbaz, M. The existence of environmental Kuznets curve: critical look and future implications for environmental management. J. Environ. Manag. 2024, 351, 119648.

15. Sanyé-mengual, E.; Secchi, M.; Corrado, S.; Beylot, A.; Sala, S. Assessing the decoupling of economic growth from environmental impacts in the European Union: a consumption-based approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117535.

16. Haberl, H.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Virág, D.; et al. A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environ. Res. Lett. 2020, 15, 065003.

17. Parrique, T.; Barth, J.; Briens, F.; et al. Decoupling debunked - evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. Eur. Environ. Bur. 2019, 80. Available from: https://eeb.org/en/library/decoupling-debunked/ [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].

18. Makarov, I.; Alataş, S. Production- and consumption-based emissions in carbon exporters and importers: a large panel data analysis for the EKC hypothesis. Appl. Energy. 2024, 363, 123063.

19. Fan, J.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Wang, C.; Wei, Y. Exploring the characteristics of production-based and consumption-based carbon emissions of major economies: a multiple-dimension comparison. Appl. Energy. 2016, 184, 790-9.

20. Ivanova, D.; Wood, R. The unequal distribution of household carbon footprints in Europe and its link to sustainability. Glob. Sustain. 2020, 3, e18.

21. Ivanova, D.; Vita, G.; Steen-Olsen, K.; et al. Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions. Environ. Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 054013.

22. Ottelin, J.; Heinonen, J.; Nässén, J.; Junnila, S. Household carbon footprint patterns by the degree of urbanisation in Europe. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 114016.

23. Yi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Qi, J. Impact of urban density on carbon emissions in China. Appl. Econ. 2021, 53, 6153-65.

24. Minx, J.; Baiocchi, G.; Wiedmann, T.; et al. Carbon footprints of cities and other human settlements in the UK. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, 035039.

25. Underwood, A.; Fremstad, A. Does sharing backfire? A decomposition of household and urban economies in CO₂ emissions. Energy. Policy. 2018, 123, 404-13.

26. Wang, Z.; Cui, C.; Peng, S. How do urbanization and consumption patterns affect carbon emissions in China? A decomposition analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 1201-8.

27. Zhou, J.; Ma, H.; Wang, S. Household consumption carbon emissions under different urbanization levels—A study based on micro-survey data. Cities 2025, 158, 105630.

28. Yuan, R.; Rodrigues, J. F.; Tukker, A.; Behrens, P. The statistical projection of global GHG emissions from a consumption perspective. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 34, 318-29.

29. Stadler, K.; Wood, R.; Bulavskaya, T.; et al. EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input-output tables. J. Ind. Ecol. 2018, 22, 502-15.

30. Ivanova, D.; Stadler, K.; Steen-Olsen, K.; et al. Environmental impact assessment of household consumption. J. Ind. Ecol. 2016, 20, 526-36.

31. Eurostat. Applying the degree of urbanisation: a methodological manual to define cities, towns and rural areas for international comparison; 2021. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/04/applying-the-degree-of-urbanisation_3b2d3c8c/4bc1c502-en.pdf [Last accessed on 8 Jul 2026].

32. Lee, D.; Fahey, D.; Skowron, A.; et al. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018. Atmos. Environ. 2021, 244, 117834.

33. IPCC. SPM - Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021 - the physical science basis working group I contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change; pp. 3-32.

34. IPCC. Summary for policymakers. Global warming of 1.5 °C IPCC special report on impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels in context of strengthening response to climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty; pp. 1-24.

35. Friedlingstein, P.; O’Sullivan, M.; Jones, M. W.; et al. Global carbon budget 2024. Earth. Syst. Sci. 2025, 17, 965-1039.

36. De Boer, P.; Rodrigues, J. F. D. Decomposition analysis: when to use which method? Econ. Syst. Res. 2019, 32, 1-28.

37. De Boer, P. Generalized fisher index or siegel-shapley decomposition? Energy. Econ. 2009, 31, 810-4.

38. Gurley, T.; Bruce, D. The effects of car access on employment outcomes for welfare recipients. J. Urban. Econ. 2005, 58, 250-72.

39. Zhao, P.; Bai, Y. The gap between and determinants of growth in car ownership in urban and rural areas of China: a longitudinal data case study. J. Transp. Geogr. 2019, 79, 102487.

40. Yu, Z.; Zhao, P. The factors in residents' mobility in rural towns of China: car ownership, road infrastructure and public transport services. J. Transp. Geogr. 2021, 91, 102950.

41. Guerra, E. The geography of car ownership in Mexico City: a joint model of households’ residential location and car ownership decisions. J. Transp. Geogr. 2015, 43, 171-80.

42. Clark, B.; Lyons, G.; Chatterjee, K. Understanding the process that gives rise to household car ownership level changes. J. Transp. Geogr. 2016, 55, 110-20.

43. Yuan, R.; Rodrigues, J. F.; Wang, J.; Tukker, A.; Behrens, P. A global overview of developments of urban and rural household GHG footprints from 2005 to 2015. Sci. Total. Environ. 2022, 806, 150695.

44. Wiedenhofer, D.; Guan, D.; Liu, Z.; Meng, J.; Zhang, N.; Wei, Y. Unequal household carbon footprints in China. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2016, 7, 75-80.

45. Heinonen, J.; Junnila, S. Residential energy consumption patterns and the overall housing energy requirements of urban and rural households in Finland. Energy. Build. 2014, 76, 295-303.

46. Badr, M.; Stadler, K. Satellite account dependent sensitivity differences to source data uncertainty in environmentally extended multi-regional input-output footprint results. Econ. Syst. Res. 2026, 1-33.

47. Gössling, S.; Humpe, A. The global scale, distribution and growth of aviation: Implications for climate change. Global. Environ. Chang. 2020, 65, 102194.