REFERENCES

1. Li, B.; Wang, L.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; Yuan, Z. Navigating copper demand-supply dynamics for China's energy transition: pathways to sustainable supply. Energy 2025, 330, 136913.

2. Gu, Y.; Yang, H.; Wu, Y.; et al. Regulation mechanism for designing decarbonization pathways in the copper industry toward carbon neutrality. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 58, 1518-30.

3. Hao, J.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, T.; Wang, K. A review of comprehensive utilization of copper slag of China. In: Lazou A, Daehn K, Fleuriault C, Gökelma M, Olivetti E, Meskers C, editors. REWAS 2022: developing tomorrow’s technical cycles. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. pp. 355-65.

4. Kulczycka, J.; Lelek, Ł.; Lewandowska, A.; Wirth, H.; Bergesen, J. D. Environmental impacts of energy‐efficient pyrometallurgical copper smelting technologies: the consequences of technological changes from 2010 to 2050. J. Ind. Ecol. 2015, 20, 304-16.

5. Maghsoudizadeh, M.; Ameri, M.; Jahanshahi Javaran, E. Performance enhancement of the flash furnaces in copper industries via 4E analysis using hydrogen–natural gas blended fuel and oxygen-enriched air. J. Clean. Prod. 2025, 525, 146556.

6. Wang, C.; Ma, M.; Li, Y.; Deng, J.; Fang, H. Optimization and feasibility analysis of waste heat recovery procedures in copper plant based on the collaborative analysis of T-Q-C diagram. Energy 2025, 326, 136330.

7. Hao, J.; Dou, Z.; Zhang, T.; Wan, X.; Wang, K. Energy conservation and emission reduction through utilization of latent heat of copper slag for iron and copper recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 436, 140602.

8. Klaffenbach, E.; Montenegro, V.; Guo, M.; Blanpain, B. Sustainable and comprehensive utilization of copper slag: a review and critical analysis. J. Sustain. Metall. 2023, 9, 468-96.

9. Zhou, H.; Basarir, H.; Poulet, T.; Li, W.; Kleiv, R. A.; Karrech, A. Life cycle assessment of recycling copper slags as cement replacement material in mine backfill. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 205, 107591.

10. Wu, Y.; Zeng, S.; Cai, J.; Zhong, Z. A study on the potential and cost of carbon reduction from low carbon technologies in the Chinese copper industry. Adv. Manag. Appl. Econ. 2024, 15, 109-29.

11. Gao, R.; Shi, Y.; Cao, C.; et al. Assessment of carbon emissions and reduction potential in China's copper smelting industry. J. Ind. Ecol. 2024, 28, 1626-40.

12. Lu, T.; Tikana, L.; Herrmann, C.; Ma, Y.; Jia, J. Environmental hotspot analysis of primary copper production in China and its future improvement potentials. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 370, 133458.

13. Shahraki, H.; Einollahipeer, F.; Abyar, H.; Erfani, M. Assessing the environmental impacts of copper cathode production based on life cycle assessment. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2024, 20, 1180-90.

14. Giurco, D.; Petrie, J. Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of copper: new technologies, more recycling or demand management? Miner. Eng. 2007, 20, 842-53.

15. Zhang, X.; Wang, H.; Ma, H. Paths and methods for achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in the copper industry. Min. Metall. 2024, 33, 456-65. Available from: http://ky.bgrimm.cn/ysjsky/ch/reader/view_abstract.aspx?file_no=20240207001&flag=1 [Last accessed on 20 May 2026].

16. Nemet, G.; Greene, J.; Müller-Hansen, F.; Minx, J. C. Dataset on the adoption of historical technologies informs the scale-up of emerging carbon dioxide removal measures. Commun. Earth. Environ. 2023, 4, 397.

17. Dung, H. T.; Do, D. T.; Nguyen, V. T. Comparison of multi-criteria decision making methods using the same data standardization method. J. Mechan. Eng. 2022, 72, 57-72.

18. Dong, D.; Tukker, A.; Steubing, B.; et al. Assessing China’s potential for reducing primary copper demand and associated environmental impacts in the context of energy transition and “Zero waste” policies. Waste. Manag. 2022, 144, 454-67.

19. Bremer, L.; Den Nijs, S.; De Groot, H. L. The energy efficiency gap and barriers to investments: Evidence from a firm survey in The Netherlands. Energy. Econ. 2024, 133, 107498.

20. Jin, X.; Qi, H.; Huang, X. Green financial regulation and corporate strategic ESG behavior: evidence from China. Financ. Res. Lett. 2024, 65, 105581.

21. Cebekhulu, B. M.; Mathaba, T. N.; Mbohwa, C. Identifying trends and research gaps in ESCO research: a systematic literature review. Energy. Strategy. Rev. 2024, 55, 101516.

22. Mittler, C.; Bucksteeg, M.; Staudt, P. Review and morphological analysis of renewable power purchasing agreement types. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2025, 211, 115293.

23. Storrs, K.; Lyhne, I.; Drustrup, R. A comprehensive framework for feasibility of CCUS deployment: a meta-review of literature on factors impacting CCUS deployment. Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Control. 2023, 125, 103878.

Carbon Footprints
ISSN 2831-932X (Online)

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/