REFERENCES
1. Zhang, N. Analysis of supply and demand status and trend of copper resources in China under development background of new energy industry. China. Min. Mag. 2023, 32, 2-9. (in Chinese).
2. Zhu, Y. G.; Zhang, W. F.; Wang, D.; Dou, S. Q.; Xu, D. Y. Resilience evaluation of China’s copper resources industrial chain and supply chain. Resour. Sci. 2023, 45, 1761-77. (in Chinese).
3. Implementation plan for the high-quality development of the copper industry (2025-2027) (MIIT Joint Raw Materials [2025] No. 18); Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China, 2025. (in Chinese) https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/202502/content_7003485.htm (accessed 2026-11-06).
4. Lu, Y.; Li, H. J. Review of research on the copper industrial chain. Resour. Ind. 2020, 22, 60-8. (in Chinese).
5. Mi, X.; Lou, H.; Xie, H.; Mo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xiang, C. Development strategy for advanced copper-based materials in China. Chin. J. Eng. Sci. 2023, 25, 96-103. (in Chinese).
6. Li, Y.; Lin, W.; Wang, Z.; Miao, B.; Lin, G. Research status and trends of high-performance copper processing materials for new energy vehicles. Copper. Eng. 2025, 6, 85-109. (in Chinese).
7. Liang, S. S.; Lv, X. Q. Research on the evolution of supply and consumption patterns of copper resources around the world and the influencing factors of copper consumption in China. China. Min. Mag. 2025, 34, 324-32. (in Chinese).
8. Hao, M.; Wang, P.; Chen, W. Q. Copper resource demand prediction for low-carbon transition of China’s power system. Resour. Sci. 2025, 47, 1449-61. (in Chinese).
9. Lin, B. L.; Yan, W. D.; Guo, J.; Su, Y.; Yu, J. W. Prospects of global copper supply and demand during the 14th Five Year Plan Period. China. Min. Mag. 2021, 30, 16-22. (in Chinese).
10. Kuipers, K. J.; van Oers, L. F.; Verboon, M.; van der Voet, E. Assessing environmental implications associated with global copper demand and supply scenarios from 2010 to 2050. Glob. Environ. Change. 2018, 49, 106-15.
11. Elshkaki, A.; Graedel, T.; Ciacci, L.; Reck, B. K. Copper demand, supply, and associated energy use to 2050. Glob. Environ. Change. 2016, 39, 305-15.
12. Van der Voet, E.; Van Oers, L.; Verboon, M.; Kuipers, K. Environmental implications of future demand scenarios for metals: methodology and application to the case of seven major metals. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 141-55.
13. Watari, T.; Nansai, K.; Nakajima, K. Major metals demand, supply, and environmental impacts to 2100: a critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 164, 105107.
14. Liu, H. X.; Wu, L. M.; Lin, Q. Y.; et al. Carbon-footprint assessment technologies and their application in key industrial sectors. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2023, 42, 2201-18. (in Chinese).
15. Wang, M. C.; Chen, R. Y. Impacts of China’s carbon-peaking and carbon-neutrality goals on the domestic copper industry. China. Nonferrous. Metall. 2021, 50, 1-4. (in Chinese).
16. Zhu, X. H.; Li, S. M.; Zeng, A. Q. A review and prospect of research on carbon emissions from the critical metal industry chain under clean energy transition. Resour. Sci. 2023, 45, 1-17. (in Chinese).
17. Zhang, X. Y.; Wang, H. B.; Ma, H. Paths and methods for achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality in the copper industry. Min. Metall. 2024, 33, 456-65. (in Chinese).
18. Chen, J. J.; Li, L. Q.; Li, B.; Wu, Y. F.; Zuo, T. Y. Current applications and development trends of LCA in the copper industry. Mater. Rep. 2017, 31, 357-62. (in Chinese). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-CLDB2017S2080.htm (accessed 2026-11-11).
19. Huang, J.; Deng, S. Y.; Ma, X. T.; Yang, J. Y. Current development and recommendations for the global copper industry. Mod. Min. 2021, 37, 1-5. (in Chinese).
20. Zhang, N.; Liu, R. X. New trends in China’s nonferrous metal mining industry under the dual-carbon and dual-circulation strategies. China. Nonferrous. Met. 2022, 21, 38-41. (in Chinese).
21. China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association. China nonferrous metals industry yearbook 2023; Metallurgical Industry Press, 2024. (in Chinese) https://data.cnki.net/yearBook/single?id=8GryeNWB8SrlALlV8Xoj2w==&pinyinCode=YZGYA (accessed 2026-11-11).
22. Finnveden, G.; Hauschild, M. Z.; Ekvall, T.; et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 91, 1-21.
23. Nuss, P.; Eckelman, M. J. Life cycle assessment of metals: a scientific synthesis. PLoS. One. 2014, 9, e101298.
24. Herrmann, I. T.; Moltesen, A. Does it matter which life cycle assessment (LCA) tool you choose? - a comparative assessment of SimaPro and GaBi. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 86, 163-9.
25. Speck, R.; Selke, S.; Auras, R.; Fitzsimmons, J. Choice of life cycle assessment software can impact packaging system decisions. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2015, 28, 579-88.
26. Takano, A.; Winter, S.; Hughes, M.; Linkosalmi, L. Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build. Environ. 2014, 79, 20-30.
27. Martínez-Rocamora, A.; Solís-Guzmán, J.; Marrero, M. LCA databases focused on construction materials: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2016, 58, 565-73.
28. Silva, D. A. L.; Nunes, A. O.; Moris, V. A. S.; Piekarski, C. M.; Rodrigues, T. O. How important is the LCA software tool you choose? Comparative results from GaBi, openLCA, SimaPro and Umberto. In Proceedings of the VII Conferencia Internacional de Análisis de Ciclo de Vida en Latinoamérica, 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318217178 (accessed 2026-11-11).
29. Sanjuan-Delmás, D.; Alvarenga, R. A. F.; Lindblom, M.; et al. Environmental assessment of copper production in Europe: an LCA case study from Sweden conducted using two conventional software-database setups. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2022, 27, 255-66.
30. Alexander, C.; Johto, H.; Lindgren, M.; Pesonen, L.; Roine, A. Comparison of environmental performance of modern copper smelting technologies. Clean. Environ. Syst. 2021, 3, 100052.
31. Liu, L.; Xiang, D.; Cao, H.; Li, P. Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of the copper production in China and the influence of main factors on the above performance. Processes 2022, 10, 2715.
32. Lu, T.; Tikana, L.; Herrmann, C.; Ma, Y.; Jia, J. Environmental hotspot analysis of primary copper production in China and its future improvement potentials. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 370, 133458.
33. Chen, J.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; et al. Environmental benefits of secondary copper from primary copper based on life cycle assessment in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 146, 35-44.
34. Ding, X. Research and application of product life cycle assessment and intelligent analysis in the copper smelting industry. Dissertation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China, 2020. (in Chinese).
35. Song, X.; Yang, J.; Lu, B.; Li, B.; Zeng, G. Identification and assessment of environmental burdens of Chinese copper production from a life cycle perspective. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2014, 8, 580-8.
36. Kandalam, A.; Reuter, M. A.; Stelter, M.; et al. A review of top submerged lance (TSL) processing-part II: thermodynamics, slag chemistry and plant flowsheets. Metals 2023, 13, 1742.
37. Wood, J.; Hoang, J.; Hughes, S. Energy efficiency of the Outotec® Ausmelt process for primary copper smelting. JOM 2017, 69, 1013-20.
38. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14044:2006, Environmental management - life cycle assessment - requirements and guidelines; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; pp 14-15. https://www.iso.org/standard/38498.html (accessed 2026-11-11).
39. Santero, N.; Hendry, J. Harmonization of LCA methodologies for the metal and mining industry. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2016, 21, 1543-53.
40. Ekvall, T.; Finnveden, G. Allocation in ISO 14041-a critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2001, 9, 197-208.
41. Weidema, B. Avoiding co‐product allocation in life‐cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 2000, 4, 11-33.
42. China Price Information Network. China market price monitoring reports, January–December 2025. (in Chinese). https://www.chinaprice.cn/jsdzqkgd/index.jhtml (accessed 2026-11-06).
43. Liao, K. C.; Yang, M. Operation situation and development prospect of sulfuric acid industry in China in 2025. Eco-Ind. Sci. Phosph. Fluor. Eng. 2026, 41, 1-7. (in Chinese). https://lfyf.cbpt.cnki.net/portal/journal/portal/client/paper/531c77a5e641d45c9bd62709f0ccac96 (accessed 2026-11-11).
44. Tu, J.; Luo, T. Development of “Double Flash” copper smelting technology. Nonferrous. Met. Extr. Metall. 2022, 3, 1-9.
45. Kojo, I. V.; Jokilaakso, A.; Hanniala, P. Flash smelting and converting furnaces: a 50 year retrospect. JOM 2000, 52, 57-61.
46. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14067:2018, Greenhouse gases-Carbon footprint of products-requirements and guidelines for quantification; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html (accessed 2026-11-11).
47. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press, 2023.
48. Database implementation & Support teams at PRé Sustainability. SimaPro Craft 10.1: what’s new? 2025. https://simapro.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/SimaPro101WhatIsNew.pdf (accessed 2026-11-06).
49. Wernet, G.; Bauer, C.; Steubing, B.; Reinhard, J.; Moreno-Ruiz, E.; Weidema, B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2016, 21, 1218-30.
50. ecoinvent Association. ecoinvent version 3.10. 2023. https://support.ecoinvent.org/ecoinvent-version-3.10 (accessed 2026-11-06).
51. ecoinvent Association. ecoinvent Version 3.11. 2024. https://support.ecoinvent.org/ecoinvent-version-3.11 (accessed 2026-11-06).
52. Ciroth, A. ICT for environment in life cycle applications openLCA - a new open source software for life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2007, 12, 209-10.
53. Cilleruelo, J. openLCA 2.1-new software release. 2024. https://www.openlca.org/openlca-2-1-new-software-release/ (accessed 2026-11-06).
54. Sphera Solutions GmbH. Life cycle assessment (LCA) software solutions. https://sphera.com/solutions/product-stewardship/life-cycle-assessment-software-and-data/ (accessed 2026-11-06).
55. Jiang, Z. L.; Xiang, S. J.; Wang, H. T.; et al. Product life cycle assessment based on online survey along supply chain. Acta. Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 7185-91. (in Chinese).
56. World Resources Institute. Chinese Life Cycle Database (CLCD). GHG Protocol. https://ghgprotocol.org/Third-Party-Databases/CLCD (accessed 2026-11-06).
57. Norgate, T.; Haque, N. Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2010, 18, 266-74.
58. Northey, S.; Haque, N.; Mudd, G. Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 40, 118-28.
59. Northey, S.; Mohr, S.; Mudd, G.; Weng, Z.; Giurco, D. Modelling future copper ore grade decline based on a detailed assessment of copper resources and mining. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2014, 83, 190-201.
60. Calvo, G.; Mudd, G.; Valero, A.; Valero, A. Decreasing ore grades in global metallic mining: a theoretical issue or a global reality? Resources 2016, 5, 36.
61. Azadi, M.; Northey, S. A.; Ali, S. H.; Edraki, M. Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nat. Geosci. 2020, 13, 100-4.
62. Huijbregts, M. A. J. Application of uncertainty and variability in LCA. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 1998, 3, 273-80.
63. Lloyd, S. M.; Ries, R. Characterizing, propagating, and analyzing uncertainty in life‐cycle assessment: a survey of quantitative approaches. J. Ind. Ecol. 2007, 11, 161-79.
64. Bamber, N.; Turner, I.; Arulnathan, V.; et al. Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2020, 25, 168-80.
65. Weidema, B. P.; Wesnæs, M. S. Data quality management for life cycle inventories-an example of using data quality indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 1996, 4, 167-74.
66. Ciroth, A.; Muller, S.; Weidema, B.; Lesage, P. Empirically based uncertainty factors for the pedigree matrix in ecoinvent. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2016, 21, 1338-48.
67. Muller, S.; Lesage, P.; Ciroth, A.; Mutel, C.; Weidema, B. P.; Samson, R. The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2016, 21, 1327-37.
68. Mo, H.; Zhang, T. Z. Data quality assessment of life cycle inventory analysis. Res. Environ. Sci. 2003, 16, 55-8. (in Chinese).
69. Heijungs, R. On the number of Monte Carlo runs in comparative probabilistic LCA. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2020, 25, 394-402.
70. Henriksson, P. J.; Heijungs, R.; Dao, H. M.; Phan, L. T.; de Snoo, G. R.; Guinée, J. B. Product carbon footprints and their uncertainties in comparative decision contexts. PLoS. One. 2015, 10, e0121221.
71. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China; National Bureau of Statistics; National Energy Administration. Announcement on the release of 2024 electricity carbon footprint factor data, announcement No. 19 of 2025; 2025. https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202510/t20251024_1130734.html (accessed 2026-11-06).
72. Zhuo, Z.; Du, E.; Zhang, N.; et al. Cost increase in the electricity supply to achieve carbon neutrality in China. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3172.
73. Wu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, S.; et al. Decarbonizing China’s grid: provincial grid carbon footprint factors and export-embedded electricity emissions from 2020 to 2060. Carbon. Footprints. 2025, 4, 31.
