REFERENCES

1. ISO. ISO 14067:2018. Greenhouse gases-carbon footprint of products-requirements and guidelines for quantification. International Organization for Standardization, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/71206.html (accessed 2026-04-08).

2. Finkbeiner, M. Carbon footprinting - opportunities and threats. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2009, 14, 91-4.

3. Yang, Y.; Bae, J.; Kim, J.; Suh, S. Replacing gasoline with corn ethanol results in significant environmental problem-shifting. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3671-8.

4. Röös, E.; Sundberg, C.; Tidåker, P.; Strid, I.; Hansson, P. Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production? Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24, 573-81.

5. Kalbar, P. P.; Birkved, M.; Karmakar, S.; Nygaard, S. E.; Hauschild, M. Can carbon footprint serve as proxy of the environmental burden from urban consumption patterns? Ecol. Indic. 2017, 74, 109-18.

6. Laurent, A.; Olsen, S. I.; Hauschild, M. Z. Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 4100-8.

7. Huijbregts, M. A.; Rombouts, L. J.; Hellweg, S.; et al. Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 641-8.

8. Bösch, M. E.; Hellweg, S.; Huijbregts, M. A. J.; Frischknecht, R. Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2006, 12, 181-90.

9. Pak, J.; O, N.; Ro, J.; Ri, P.; Ri, T. Correlation analysis of life cycle impact assessment methods and their impact categories in the food sector: representativeness and predictability of impact indicators. Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2023, 28, 1302-15.

10. Laurenti, R.; Demirer Demir, D.; Finnveden, G. Analyzing the relationship between product waste footprints and environmental damage - a life cycle analysis of 1,400+ products. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023, 859, 160405.

11. Pak, S.; O, N.; Ri, R.; Ro, J.; Ri, P. Applicability of carbon footprint as indicator for environmental performance of food products. Int. J. Environ. Res. 2023, 18, 5.

12. Amer, E. A. A. A.; Meyad, E. M. A.; Meyad, A. M.; Mohsin, A. K. M. The impact of natural resources on environmental degradation: a review of ecological footprint and CO₂ emissions as indicators. Front. Environ. Sci. 2024, 12, 1368125.

13. Erhart, S.; Erhart, K. Environmental ranking of European industrial facilities by toxicity and global warming potentials. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1772.

14. Steinmann, Z. J. N.; Schipper, A. M.; Hauck, M.; Giljum, S.; Wernet, G.; Huijbregts, M. A. J. Resource footprints are good proxies of environmental damage. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 6360-6.

15. Heijungs, R.; Dekker, E. Meta-comparisons: how to compare methods for LCA? Int. J. Life. Cycle. Assess. 2022, 27, 993-1015.

16. Fisher, N. I. Statistical analysis of circular data. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

17. Lee, A. Circular data. WIREs. Comput. Stat. 2010, 2, 477-86.

18. Cohen, J.; Cohen, P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 4th ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.

19. Neter, J.; Wasserman, W.; Kutner, M. H. Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs, 2th ed.; IRWIN, Chicago, 1985. https://archive.org/details/appliedlinearsta00nete/page/n3/mode/2up (accessed 2026-04-14).

20. Heijungs, R. Probability, statistics and life cycle assessment: guidance for dealing with uncertainty and sensitivity. Springer, Cham, 2024.

21. Damiani, M.; Ferrara, N.; Ardente, F. Understanding product environmental footprint and organisation environmental footprint methods. European Union, Luxembourg, 2022. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC129907 (accessed 2026-04-14).